DOCSLIB.ORG

The Distribution of Phylogenetic Diversity of Mammals in Mexico and Its Implications for Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Distribution of Phylogenetic Diversity of Mammals in Mexico and Its Implications for Conservation University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2007 THE DISTRIBUTION OF PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY OF MAMMALS IN MEXICO AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION ZAYAS, ENA EDITH MATA http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/2342 University of Plymouth All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. THE DISTRIBUTION OF PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY OF MAMMALS IN MEXICO AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR CONSERVATION by ENA EDITH MATA ZAYAS A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biological Sciences Fa culty of Science 2007 University of Plymouth Library Abstract The current rate of biodiversity loss has stimulated studies aimed at identifying areas of concentration of biodiversity where conservation efforts can be targeted. Phylogeny has become an important element in conservation either to preserve areas of high phylogenetic diversity (and therefore evolutionary history) or to identify species attributes that make them prone to become endangered or at risk of extinction. This dissertation dealt with the quantification of phylogenetic diversity of Mexican mammals, its geographic distribution, and its correlation with both the life history attributes of the species and selected characteristics of the environment. In order to do this, I had to construct a complete and reasonably well-resolved phylogeny of the 416 species of terrestrial mammals. This has allowed assessing the benefits and limitations, as well as the similarities and differences, of the two indices of phylogenetic information currently in use: Faith's index of phylogenetic diversity (PO) and Clarke & Warwick's index of taxonomic distinctiveness (TO). This has also allowing to evaluate the degree of correspondence between the distribution of these indices and the distribution of the natural protected areas of Mexico and to identify the minimum number of reserves (and their location) that would be required to protect all 416 species. Although these indices show a high degree of correlation, by emphasising slightly different aspects of the topology of the classification, they sometimes differ in their identification of priority areas. The results show that the value of either PO or TO is determined primarily by species­ richness ( S) and secondarily by the topology of the phylogeny. In general, areas of high phylogenetic complexity (HPA, those made up of distantly-related taxa, independent of their number) are found mainly in regions traditionally recognised as worthy of conservation, such as the Transvolcanic Belt and the tropical South-East region. Comparative analysis employing the method of independent contrasts showed the correlation between different life history attributes of the species, as well as the correlation between these life history attributes and some characteristics of the environment (such as latitudinal range, average temperature and average precipitation in the distribution of each species). This permitted exploration of the benefits and limitations of life histories as subjects for conservation. iii List of Contents Copyright Statement ............................................................................................................ i Abstract. ............................................................................................................................... iii List of Contents .................................................................................................................. iv List of Tables ....................................................................................................................... ix List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... xi List of Equations ................................................................................................................ xvi List of Abbreviations/Acronyms ...................................................................................... xvi Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... xvii Author's declaration ........................................................................................................xviii CHAPTER 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION ............................................................ ! 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 2 1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE THESIS ............................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 2. CURRENT PRIORITIES IN THE CONSERVATION OF BIODIVERSITY ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 2.1.1 Definition of Biodiversity .................. ........................ .. .................................................... 6 2.1.2 Biodiversity Measures for Conservation ... ..... ......................... ..... .. ........................ ........ 7 2.2 PHYLOGENY AND CONSERVATION ................................................................................ 10 2.2.1 Phylogenetic Diversity ..................................................................... ..................... ........ 13 2.2 .2 Ta xonomic Di stinctiveness ..................... ... ................ .... ........... .. ................... ............... 13 2.2.3 Conservation .. .... .... .. ........................... ... ... ....... ... .... ..................................................... 15 2.3 THE DISTRIBUTION OF BIODIVERSITY ............................................................................ 17 iv 2.3.1 Megadiverse Countries and Mexico .. .................. .. ... ... ........ ... ............................................. 19 2.3 PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO PROTECTED AREA DESIGNATION ...................................... 21 2.4 SUMMARY ................................................... ........................................................ .. ...... 24 CHAPTER 3 . CONABIO'S BIODIVERSITY DATABASES .............. 000000 00 00 ......... 27 3.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 27 3.2. METHODS .................................................................................................................... 29 CONABIO's Database: a ca se study ............ ............................................... .... ............. .. ..... ........... 29 3.3. RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 34 3.3.1 Gymnosperms ....... ..................... ................................................................................. 34 3.3.2 Angiosperms ...................................................................... .... ................... ................... 36 3.3.3 Mammals .......................... .......................... .................................. ............................... 37 3.4. DISCUSSION ........................................................................... .. .................................... 38 CHAPTER 4. TAXONOMY AND PHYLOGENY OF MEXICAN MAMMALS 000000 48 4.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 48 4.2 METHODS .. .................................................................................................................. 51 4.2.1 Taxonomic Classi fica tion .................................................................... .......................... 51 4.2.2 Phylogenet ic Tree ..... ................... .. .......... ............. .. ...................................................... 51 4.3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ............................................................................................ 53 4.3.1 The Taxonomy of M exica n Mammals (t) .................. ........ ....................... ........ .. .......... 53 4.3.2 A Phylogenetic Supertree of M exican Mammals (p) .. ...... .. .... ................. ................ .... 72 CHAPTER 5. PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY OF MEXICAN MAMMALS 00 . ........ 92 5.1. INTRODUCTION ............................. .......... ..................................................................... 92 5.1.1 Measures of Diversity Ba sed on Relatedness of Species ............................................. 93 5.1.2 Diversity Skewness (05) .. .. .................................................................... ....................... 98 V 5.2. METHODS ............................... .. ..................................... ............................................ 100 5.2.1 Data Set ............................... ......................... ............................ ..... .............. ............... 100 5.2.2 Diversity Analyses .................................................. ................................ ...
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genetic Variation Within a Broadly Distributed Chewing Louse Genus (Thomomydoecus)
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Honors Program Theses Honors Program 2020 Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2020 Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Bruns, Clarissa Elizabeth, "Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus)" (2020). Honors Program Theses. 433. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt/433 This Open Access Honors Program Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENETIC VARIATION WITHIN A BROADLY DISTRIBUTED CHEWING LOUSE GENUS (THOMOMYDOECUS) A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Designation University Honors with Distinction Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa May 2020 This Study by: Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Entitled: Genetic distribution within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) has been approved as meeting the thesis or project requirement for the Designation University Honors with Distinction ________ ______________________________________________________ Date James Demastes, Honors Thesis Advisor, Biology ________ ______________________________________________________ Date Dr. Jessica Moon, Director, University Honors Program Abstract No broad study has been conducted to examine the genetics of Thomomydoecus species and their patterns of geographic variation. Chewing lice and their parasite-host relationships with pocket gophers have been studied as a key example of cophylogeny (Demastes et al., 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014
    Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 José Ramírez-Pulido, Noé González-Ruiz, Alfred L. Gardner, and Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales.0 Front cover: Image of the cover of Nova Plantarvm, Animalivm et Mineralivm Mexicanorvm Historia, by Francisci Hernández et al. (1651), which included the first list of the mammals found in Mexico. Cover image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University. SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 JOSÉ RAMÍREZ-PULIDO, NOÉ GONZÁLEZ-RUIZ, ALFRED L. GARDNER, AND JOAQUÍN ARROYO-CABRALES Layout and Design: Lisa Bradley Cover Design: Image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University Production Editor: Lisa Bradley Copyright 2014, Museum of Texas Tech University This publication is available free of charge in PDF format from the website of the Natural Sciences Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University (nsrl.ttu.edu). The authors and the Museum of Texas Tech University hereby grant permission to interested parties to download or print this publication for personal or educational (not for profit) use. Re-publication of any part of this paper in other works is not permitted without prior written permission of the Museum of Texas Tech University. This book was set in Times New Roman and printed on acid-free paper that meets the guidelines for per- manence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Printed: 18 September 2014 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 63 Series Editor: Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Taxonomy to Wildlife Research and Management Module Overview
    TheThe SpeciesSpecies QuestionQuestion ApplyingApplying TaxonomyTaxonomy ToTo WildlifeWildlife ResearchResearch AndAnd ManagementManagement September 1, 2006 Dear Educator, Colorado has long been committed to the conservation of all wildlife species, whether hunted, or fished, or viewed. One of the nation’s great wildlife restoration success stories—the American Peregrine Falcon—had its beginnings here in the early 1970’s. A Colorado biologist rappelled over cliffs more than 500 feet high, dangled from a thin rope and dodged swooping Peregrines to retrieve their DDT-thinned eggs. He tucked them into his vest and made all-night drives across the state for artificial incubation and hatching. Other successes, such as the restoration and recovery of prairie grouse, lynx, river otter and a number of native fishes, also have their roots in the efforts of Colorado Division of Wildlife professionals. Science-based management decisions are essential to securing species at risk, as well as conserving all the state’s wildlife species. The numbers of scientific disciplines that influence and inform wildlife management are staggering. Advances in taxonomy and molecular biology, in particular, have affected how biologists think about and identify species and subspecies. We invite you and your students to explore new developments in the frontiers of science with us as we harness innovative technologies and ideas and use them to maintain healthy, diverse and abundant wildlife. Sincerely, Bruce L. McCloskey Director Acknowledgments Funding for this project was provided by US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program Grant No. R-11-1, Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund (GOCO), and the sportsmen of Colorado. The Colorado Division of Wildlife gratefully acknowledges the following individuals: For content advice and critical review: Field-test Educators (cont.): Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Zp Rodent Bait Ag
    1 RESTRICTED USE PESTICIDE Due to Hazards to Non-target Species For retail sale to and use only by Certified Applicators or persons under their direct supervision and only for those uses covered by the Certified Applicator’s certification. ZP RODENT BAIT AG For use in rangeland, pastures, non-crop rights-of-way, alfalfa, timothy, barley, potatoes, wheat, sugar beets, sugarcane, grape vineyards, fruit and nut tree orchards, macadamia nut orchards, in and around buildings, and other sites to SPECIMENcontrol the species listed in the use directions . Active Ingredient Zinc Phosphide………………… 2.0% Other Ingredients…………………….. 98.0% Total…………………………… 100.0% KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION FIRST AID HAVE LABEL WITH YOU WHEN SEEKING TREATMENT ADVICE (1-877-854-2494) If you experience signs and symptoms such as nausea, abdominal pain, tightness in chest, or weakness, see a physician immediately.LABEL For information on health concerns, medical emergencies, or pesticide incidents, call the National Pesticide Information Center at 1-800-858-7378. IF SWALLOWED: Call a Poison Control Center, doctor, or 1-877-854-2494 immediately for treatment advice or transport the person to the nearest hospital. Do not give any liquid to the patient. Do not administer anything by mouth. Do not induce vomiting unless told to do so by the poison control center or doctor. IF ON SKIN OR CLOTHING: Take off contaminated clothing. Rinse skin immediately with plenty of water for 15-20 minutes. Call a poison control center, doctor, or 1-877-854-2494 immediately for treatment advice. IF INHALED: Move person to fresh air.
    [Show full text]
  • B.Sc. II YEAR CHORDATA
    B.Sc. II YEAR CHORDATA CHORDATA 16SCCZO3 Dr. R. JENNI & Dr. R. DHANAPAL DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY M. R. GOVT. ARTS COLLEGE MANNARGUDI CONTENTS CHORDATA COURSE CODE: 16SCCZO3 Block and Unit title Block I (Primitive chordates) 1 Origin of chordates: Introduction and charterers of chordates. Classification of chordates up to order level. 2 Hemichordates: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Balanoglossus and its affinities. 3 Urochordata: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Herdmania and its affinities. 4 Cephalochordates: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Branchiostoma (Amphioxus) and its affinities. 5 Cyclostomata (Agnatha) General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Petromyzon and its affinities. Block II (Lower chordates) 6 Fishes: General characters and classification up to order level. Types of scales and fins of fishes, Scoliodon as type study, migration and parental care in fishes. 7 Amphibians: General characters and classification up to order level, Rana tigrina as type study, parental care, neoteny and paedogenesis. 8 Reptilia: General characters and classification up to order level, extinct reptiles. Uromastix as type study. Identification of poisonous and non-poisonous snakes and biting mechanism of snakes. 9 Aves: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Columba (Pigeon) and Characters of Archaeopteryx. Flight adaptations & bird migration. 10 Mammalia: General characters and classification up
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA Evolution: a Comparison of the Cytochrome B and Cytochrome C Oxidase II Genes
    J Mol Evol (1995) 40:260-272 jouRA,oMOLECULAR VOLUTION © Springer-VerlagNew York Inc. 1995 Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA Evolution: A Comparison of the Cytochrome b and Cytochrome c Oxidase II Genes Rodney L. Honeycutt,1 Michael A. Nedbal, 1 Ronald M. Adkins, 1'* Laura L. Janecek 1'2 i Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 210 Nagle Hall, College Station, TX 77843, USA 2 Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC 29801, USA Received: 10 June 1994 / Accepted: 10 October 1994 Abstract. The evolution of two mitochondrial genes, Introduction cytochrome b and cytochrome c oxidase subunit II, was examined in several eutherian mammal orders, with spe- The mitochondrial cytochrome b (COB) and cytochrome cial emphasis on the orders Artiodactyla and Rodentia. c oxidase subunit II (COII) genes have been used in When analyzed using both maximum parsimony, with several recent molecular systematic studies of rodents either equal or unequal character weighting, and neigh- (DeWalt et al. 1993; Ma et al. 1993; Thomas and Martin bor joining, neither gene performed with a high degree of 1993), ungulates (Irwin et al. 1991; Irwin and Wilson consistency in terms of the phylogenetic hypotheses sup- 1992; Miyamoto et al. 1994), marine mammals (Irwin ported. The phylogenetic inconsistencies observed for and Arnason 1994), primates (Ruvolo et al. 1991; Diso- both these genes may be the result of several factors tell et al. 1992; Adkins and Honeycutt 1994), and euthe- including differences in the rate of nucleotide substitu- rian mammal orders (Adkins and Honeycutt 1991, 1993; tion among particular lineages (especially between or- Honeycutt and Adldns 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Gophers Habitat Modification
    Summary of Damage Prevention and Control Methods POCKET GOPHERS HABITAT MODIFICATION Rotate to annual crops Apply herbicides to control tap‐rooted plants for 2 consecutive years Flood land Rotate or cover crop with grasses, grains, or other fibrous‐rooted plants EXCLUSION Figure 1. Plains pocket gopher. Photo by Ron Case. Small wire‐mesh fences may provide protection for ornamental trees and shrubs or flower beds Plastic netting to protect seedlings Protect pipes and underground cables with pipes at least 3 inches in diameter or surround them with 6 to 8 inches of coarse gravel. FRIGHTENING Nothing effective REPELLENTS None practical Figure 2. Pocket gophers get their name from the pouches TOXICANTS on the sides of their head. Image by PCWD. Zinc phosphide Chlorophacinone OBJECTIVES 1. Describe basic pocket gopher biology and FUMIGANTS behavior 2. Identify pocket gopher signs Aluminum phosphide and gas cartridges 3. Explain different methods to control pocket gophers SHOOTING white, but generally align with soil coloration. The great variability in size and color of pocket gophers is Not practical attributed to their low dispersal rate and limited gene flow, resulting in adaptations to local TRAPPING conditions. Thirty‐five species of pocket gophers, represented by Various specialized body‐grip traps 5 genera occupy the western hemisphere. Fourteen Baited box traps species and 3 genera exist in the US. The major features differentiating these genera are the size of SPECIES PROFILE their forefeet, claws, and front surfaces of their chisel‐like incisors. Southeastern pocket gopher (Geomys pinetis) is the only species occurring in IDENTIFICATION Alabama. Pocket gophers are so named because they have fur‐ Geomys (Figure 3) have 2 grooves on each upper lined pouches outside of the mouth, one on each incisor and large forefeet and claws.
    [Show full text]
  • Rodentia, Hystricognathi): Integrando Datos Fósiles Y Actuales a Través De Un Enfoque Panbiogeográfico
    AMEGHINIANA (Rev. Asoc. Paleontol. Argent.) - 40 (3): 361-378. Buenos Aires, 30-09-2003 ISSN0002-7014 Biogeografía de puercoespines neotropicales (Rodentia, Hystricognathi): Integrando datos fósiles y actuales a través de un enfoque panbiogeográfico Adriana M. CANDELA1y Juan J. MORRONE2 Abstract.BIOGEOGRAPHYOFNEOTROPICALPORCUPINES(RODENTIA, HYSTRICOGNATHI): INTEGRATINGRECENTAND FOSSILDATATHROUGHAPANBIOGEOGRAPHICAPPROACH. This paper analyzes the geographic and temporal dis- tribution of the family Erethizontidae (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) and other fossil and living groups of neotropical mammals, with the aim of identifying distributional patterns. These patterns were recognized using the panbiogeographic method, on the basis of three requirements: (1) current representation of the groups in the Brazilian Subregion, (2) arboreal habits, and (3) recognized monophyly from the Deseadense. Two ancestral biotas were identified: one comprising the current Patagonia and areas of in- tertropical latitude mainly in western South America, the other, essentially intertropical, includes the fos- sil localities of the caves of Lagoa Santa and Bahia. Both biotas would have differentiated very early, at least from late Oligocene. The fossil locality of La Venta (middle Miocene) would correspond to a complex area or node. Current Patagonia would have acted as an area of marginal differentiation with regard to the radiations of the living taxa. The central region of Patagonia experienced marine transgressions and vol- canic activity during the middle Tertiary and could represent a baseline. Both the phylogenetic relation- ships and the temporal and geographic distribution of late Miocene erethizontids indicate a geographic differentiation between the Northwest and the Northeast Argentina, at least from late Miocene. Resumen. En este trabajo se analiza la distribución geográfica y temporal de los Erethizontidae (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) y de otros grupos de mamíferos neotropicales fósiles y vivientes a fin de identificar pa- trones comunes de distribución.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita Kenneth T
    CURRICULUM VITA KENNETH T. WILKINS Personal Faculty office: Department of Biology, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798-7388 (254) 710-2911, FAX: (254) 710-2969 Administrative office: Graduate School, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798-7264 (254) 710-3588, FAX: (254) 710-3870 e-mail: [email protected] Education B.S., Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, 1974 M.S., Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 1977 Ph.D., Zoology, University of Florida, 1982 Professional Experience Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Baylor Graduate School; Professor (tenured), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, June 2006-present. Courses taught: Mammalogy, Comparative Chordate Anatomy, Vertebrate Biology, Vertebrate Paleontology, Graduate Seminars in Biology, Graduate Proseminars in Interdisciplinary Scholarship. Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Baylor Graduate School; Professor (tenured) and Interim Graduate Program Director (Biology), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, September 2003-May 2006. Courses taught: Mammalogy, Comparative Chordate Anatomy, Vertebrate Natural History, Vertebrate Paleontology, Graduate Seminars in Biology, Graduate Proseminars in Interdisciplinary Teaching and Interdisciplinary Scholarship. Associate Dean of Graduate Studies and Research, Baylor Graduate School; Professor (tenured), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, September 2000-2003. Courses taught: Mammalogy (taught in Waco and at Chapala Ecology Station in Mexico), Comparative Chordate Anatomy, Vertebrate Natural History, Vertebrate Paleontology, Graduate Seminars in Biology, Graduate Proseminars in Interdisciplinary Teaching and Interdisciplinary Scholarship. Associate Dean of the Graduate School; Professor (tenured), Depts. of Biology and Geology, and in Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, June 1998-2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Science Journal 2013;10(2) 2118
    Life Science Journal 2013;10(2) http://www.lifesciencesite.com DNA-typing for Cytochrome Oxidase-1 of Hystrix indica (Rodentia; Hystricidae) from Kingdom Saudi Arabia Metwally M. Montaser1,2* and Samy F. Mahmoud1,3 1 Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 888, Taif 21974, KSA. 2 Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, 11884 Nasr City, Cairo, Egypt. 3 Department of Dairy Res., Food Techn. Res. Institute, Agric. Res., Center, Giza, Egypt. * [email protected], [email protected], Abstract: Approximately 600 bp from cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 gene (CO1) have been sequenced for samples of Hystrix indica from different localities in Saudi Arabia. The data were manipulated and aligned by DNA star program and were compared in order to show the base differences among the individuals and there was no base difference among the Saudi samples. By using Blast program inside the package of the NCBI, the sequenced fragment was compared with its counterparts from the same species. The alignment of our data to the Indian haplotypes showed variations at the positions 66, 180, 210, 216, 276, 279, 339, 504 and 510. The variations were synonymous transitions of G66, 210, 504 in Indian samples to A66, 210, 504 in Saudi samples. Other transition of A276, 279, 510 in Indian samples to G276, 279, 510 in Saudi samples have also been found. Thymine339 in Saudi samples and Indian samples were shown against C339 in one Indian haplotype. Among these transitions, only one non- synonymous change was revealed in which isoleucine70 in the Saudi samples was substituted with methionine70 in Indian haplotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Phylogeny of the Gundis (Ctenodactylinae, Ctenodactylidae, Rodentia) Raquel López-Antoñanzas, Fabien Knoll
    A comprehensive phylogeny of the gundis (Ctenodactylinae, Ctenodactylidae, Rodentia) Raquel López-Antoñanzas, Fabien Knoll To cite this version: Raquel López-Antoñanzas, Fabien Knoll. A comprehensive phylogeny of the gundis (Ctenodactylinae, Ctenodactylidae, Rodentia). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, Taylor & Francis, 2011, 9 (3), pp.379 - 398. 10.1080/14772019.2010.529175. hal-01920843 HAL Id: hal-01920843 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01920843 Submitted on 28 Dec 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. A comprehensive phylogeny of the gundis (Ctenodactylinae, Ctenodactylidae, Rodentia) Raquel López-Antoñanzas & Fabien Knoll Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales-CSIC, c/ José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, Madrid 28006, Spain. E-mails (RLA): [email protected]; (FK): [email protected] Abstract The subfamily Ctenodactylinae is known from the Early Miocene up to the present. Today, this group comprises five species, which are restricted to north and east equatorial areas in Africa. However, by Miocene times, the ctenodactylines experienced their greatest diversification and widest distribution from Asia, their land of origin, to Africa where they entered during the Middle Miocene at the latest. So far 24 species can be referred to this group: Ctenodactylus gundi, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Times in Rodents Based on Both Genes and Fossils Ryan Norris University of Vermont
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2009 Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Times in Rodents Based on Both Genes and Fossils Ryan Norris University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Recommended Citation Norris, Ryan, "Phylogenetic Relationships and Divergence Times in Rodents Based on Both Genes and Fossils" (2009). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 164. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/164 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS AND DIVERGENCE TIMES IN RODENTS BASED ON BOTH GENES AND FOSSILS A Dissertation Presented by Ryan W. Norris to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Specializing in Biology February, 2009 Accepted by the Faculty of the Graduate College, The University of Vermont, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, specializing in Biology. Dissertation ~xaminationCommittee: w %amB( Advisor 6.William ~il~atrickph.~. Duane A. Schlitter, Ph.D. Chairperson Vice President for Research and Dean of Graduate Studies Date: October 24, 2008 Abstract Molecular and paleontological approaches have produced extremely different estimates for divergence times among orders of placental mammals and within rodents with molecular studies suggesting a much older date than fossils. We evaluated the conflict between the fossil record and molecular data and find a significant correlation between dates estimated by fossils and relative branch lengths, suggesting that molecular data agree with the fossil record regarding divergence times in rodents.
    [Show full text]