Curriculum Vita Kenneth T
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mexican Free-Tailed Bat Tadarida Brasiliensis
General Info MEXICAN FREE-TAILED BAT Also known as the Brazilian free- TADARIDA BRASILIENSIS tailed bat, it’s native to America especially Southern California. They move and migrate in huge numbers, only to a few locations. They are vulnerable to destroying habitats in spite of their species being low in abundance. They are in declining population in California which makes it a species of concern in the state. Fun Fact Area Where The They have the fastest This Bats Live: horizontal bats live year round speed of any in the areas of animal south west Unites reaching top States. ground speed of 160 km/h. Physical Features Nutrition On average they grow to 9 cm in They are insectivores and length and weight about 12.3 g. The they hunt their prey using average wingspan is 23 cm, their tail echolocation. Their diet accounts for most of their length. consists of moths, beetles, Their ears are close to their muzzle dragonflies, true bugs, and and eyes which are wide and set apart ants. Their pollination of which helps them find prey using sugarcane and their echolocation. Their wings are consumption of insects elongated with pointed tips, which that damage that sugar make them quick for straight flight canes are the reason some patterns. Their fur can be from dark alcohol companies have brown to gray. the bats as their icon in http://www.batcon.org/resources/media-education/bats- magazine/bat_article/656 Nicholas Roman Biology 12 Dr. Joanna their labels. . -
Genetic Variation Within a Broadly Distributed Chewing Louse Genus (Thomomydoecus)
University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Honors Program Theses Honors Program 2020 Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©2020 Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Genetics Commons Recommended Citation Bruns, Clarissa Elizabeth, "Genetic variation within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus)" (2020). Honors Program Theses. 433. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/hpt/433 This Open Access Honors Program Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Program Theses by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GENETIC VARIATION WITHIN A BROADLY DISTRIBUTED CHEWING LOUSE GENUS (THOMOMYDOECUS) A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Designation University Honors with Distinction Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns University of Northern Iowa May 2020 This Study by: Clarissa Elizabeth Bruns Entitled: Genetic distribution within a broadly distributed chewing louse genus (Thomomydoecus) has been approved as meeting the thesis or project requirement for the Designation University Honors with Distinction ________ ______________________________________________________ Date James Demastes, Honors Thesis Advisor, Biology ________ ______________________________________________________ Date Dr. Jessica Moon, Director, University Honors Program Abstract No broad study has been conducted to examine the genetics of Thomomydoecus species and their patterns of geographic variation. Chewing lice and their parasite-host relationships with pocket gophers have been studied as a key example of cophylogeny (Demastes et al., 2012). -
Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014
Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 José Ramírez-Pulido, Noé González-Ruiz, Alfred L. Gardner, and Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales.0 Front cover: Image of the cover of Nova Plantarvm, Animalivm et Mineralivm Mexicanorvm Historia, by Francisci Hernández et al. (1651), which included the first list of the mammals found in Mexico. Cover image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University. SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 JOSÉ RAMÍREZ-PULIDO, NOÉ GONZÁLEZ-RUIZ, ALFRED L. GARDNER, AND JOAQUÍN ARROYO-CABRALES Layout and Design: Lisa Bradley Cover Design: Image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University Production Editor: Lisa Bradley Copyright 2014, Museum of Texas Tech University This publication is available free of charge in PDF format from the website of the Natural Sciences Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University (nsrl.ttu.edu). The authors and the Museum of Texas Tech University hereby grant permission to interested parties to download or print this publication for personal or educational (not for profit) use. Re-publication of any part of this paper in other works is not permitted without prior written permission of the Museum of Texas Tech University. This book was set in Times New Roman and printed on acid-free paper that meets the guidelines for per- manence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Printed: 18 September 2014 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 63 Series Editor: Robert J. -
Applying Taxonomy to Wildlife Research and Management Module Overview
TheThe SpeciesSpecies QuestionQuestion ApplyingApplying TaxonomyTaxonomy ToTo WildlifeWildlife ResearchResearch AndAnd ManagementManagement September 1, 2006 Dear Educator, Colorado has long been committed to the conservation of all wildlife species, whether hunted, or fished, or viewed. One of the nation’s great wildlife restoration success stories—the American Peregrine Falcon—had its beginnings here in the early 1970’s. A Colorado biologist rappelled over cliffs more than 500 feet high, dangled from a thin rope and dodged swooping Peregrines to retrieve their DDT-thinned eggs. He tucked them into his vest and made all-night drives across the state for artificial incubation and hatching. Other successes, such as the restoration and recovery of prairie grouse, lynx, river otter and a number of native fishes, also have their roots in the efforts of Colorado Division of Wildlife professionals. Science-based management decisions are essential to securing species at risk, as well as conserving all the state’s wildlife species. The numbers of scientific disciplines that influence and inform wildlife management are staggering. Advances in taxonomy and molecular biology, in particular, have affected how biologists think about and identify species and subspecies. We invite you and your students to explore new developments in the frontiers of science with us as we harness innovative technologies and ideas and use them to maintain healthy, diverse and abundant wildlife. Sincerely, Bruce L. McCloskey Director Acknowledgments Funding for this project was provided by US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Conservation and Restoration Program Grant No. R-11-1, Great Outdoors Colorado Trust Fund (GOCO), and the sportsmen of Colorado. The Colorado Division of Wildlife gratefully acknowledges the following individuals: For content advice and critical review: Field-test Educators (cont.): Dr. -
Zp Rodent Bait Ag
1 RESTRICTED USE PESTICIDE Due to Hazards to Non-target Species For retail sale to and use only by Certified Applicators or persons under their direct supervision and only for those uses covered by the Certified Applicator’s certification. ZP RODENT BAIT AG For use in rangeland, pastures, non-crop rights-of-way, alfalfa, timothy, barley, potatoes, wheat, sugar beets, sugarcane, grape vineyards, fruit and nut tree orchards, macadamia nut orchards, in and around buildings, and other sites to SPECIMENcontrol the species listed in the use directions . Active Ingredient Zinc Phosphide………………… 2.0% Other Ingredients…………………….. 98.0% Total…………………………… 100.0% KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION FIRST AID HAVE LABEL WITH YOU WHEN SEEKING TREATMENT ADVICE (1-877-854-2494) If you experience signs and symptoms such as nausea, abdominal pain, tightness in chest, or weakness, see a physician immediately.LABEL For information on health concerns, medical emergencies, or pesticide incidents, call the National Pesticide Information Center at 1-800-858-7378. IF SWALLOWED: Call a Poison Control Center, doctor, or 1-877-854-2494 immediately for treatment advice or transport the person to the nearest hospital. Do not give any liquid to the patient. Do not administer anything by mouth. Do not induce vomiting unless told to do so by the poison control center or doctor. IF ON SKIN OR CLOTHING: Take off contaminated clothing. Rinse skin immediately with plenty of water for 15-20 minutes. Call a poison control center, doctor, or 1-877-854-2494 immediately for treatment advice. IF INHALED: Move person to fresh air. -
Quantifying Exposure of Wyoming's Wildlife To
QUANTIFYING EXPOSURE OF WYOMING’S WILDLIFE TO ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN THE F ACE OF EXPANDING PRODUCTION Prepared by Douglas Keinath1 and Matthew Kauffman2 1 Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Dept. 3381, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 USA; E-mail: [email protected] 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, 1000 E. University Ave., Dept. 3166, Laramie, Wyoming 82071, USA; E-mail: [email protected] December 30, 2014 Suggested citation for this report: Keinath, D. and M. Kauffman. 2014. Quantifying exposure of Wyoming’s wildlife to energy development in the face of expanding production. Report prepared by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database, Laramie Wyoming and Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit for the Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Cheyenne, Wyoming and the U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, Colorado. December 30, 2014. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures ..................................................................................................................... 3 Summary ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Methods ...................................................................................................................................................... -
Tadarida Fulminans – Malagasy Free-Tailed Bat
Tadarida fulminans – Malagasy Free-tailed Bat T. fulminans are recognised (Skinner & Chimimba 2005). The three large Tadarida species are easily distinguished from other large Molossid species by their unwrinkled upper lips (Monadjem et al. 2010). Assessment Rationale Although the species has a very restricted range within the assessment region, being recorded only from the Pafuri region of Kruger National Park, it is widespread (although patchily distributed) elsewhere in Zimbabwe and East Africa. Because it occurs exclusively in a protected area, and there are no plausible threats within the assessment region or throughout its range, it does not qualify for Vulnerable D2. Its population size is unknown but is Ara Monadjem assumed to be stable inside Kruger National Park. Thus we list this species as Least Concern. Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Regional population effects: It has a high wing loading National Red List status (2004) Not Evaluated (Monadjem et al. 2010), and thus we assume dispersal and rescue effects are possible. Reasons for change Non-genuine change: New information Distribution Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern This species ranges through East Africa, southern Africa TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None and a few localities on the island of Madagascar CITES listing None (Monadjem et al. 2016). It has been recorded from a number of regions in eastern and southeastern Africa, Endemic Edge of range along the border of Kenya and Uganda, as far south as Zimbabwe, central and northern Mozambique, southern The high-flying molossid Malagasy Free-tailed Malawi, the very northern reaches of South Africa, with an Bat (Tadarida fulminans) is unique amongst isolated record in northeast Zambia (Monadjem et al. -
Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management
Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment for the Use of Wildlife Damage Management Methods by USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services Chapter I Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management MAY 2017 Introduction to Risk Assessments for Methods Used in Wildlife Damage Management EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The USDA-APHIS-Wildlife Services (WS) Program completed Risk Assessments for methods used in wildlife damage management in 1992 (USDA 1997). While those Risk Assessments are still valid, for the most part, the WS Program has expanded programs into different areas of wildlife management and wildlife damage management (WDM) such as work on airports, with feral swine and management of other invasive species, disease surveillance and control. Inherently, these programs have expanded the methods being used. Additionally, research has improved the effectiveness and selectiveness of methods being used and made new tools available. Thus, new methods and strategies will be analyzed in these risk assessments to cover the latest methods being used. The risk assements are being completed in Chapters and will be made available on a website, which can be regularly updated. Similar methods are combined into single risk assessments for efficiency; for example Chapter IV contains all foothold traps being used including standard foothold traps, pole traps, and foot cuffs. The Introduction to Risk Assessments is Chapter I and was completed to give an overall summary of the national WS Program. The methods being used and risks to target and nontarget species, people, pets, and the environment, and the issue of humanenss are discussed in this Chapter. From FY11 to FY15, WS had work tasks associated with 53 different methods being used. -
Florida's Bats: Brazilian Free-Tailed Bat1
WEC379 Florida’s Bats: Brazilian Free-tailed Bat1 Holly K. Ober, Terry J. Doonan, and Emily H. Evans2 The Brazilian free-tailed bat (Figure 1) is found throughout Florida and is the state’s most common bat. With a wingspan of 12 inches (31 cm), it is a medium-sized bat. Fur color varies from dark brown to gray-brown. Brazilian free-tailed bats have long tails and wrinkled cheeks. Figure 2. Brazilian free-tailed bats can be found in every county throughout Florida. Figure 1. Brazilian free-tailed bat (Tadarida brasiliensis). Credits: Emily Evans Credits: Merlin Tuttle, Merlin Tuttle’s Bat Conservation http://www. merlintuttle.com/ In Florida, these bats roost (sleep during the day) primarily in man-made structures. They have been found roosting in Found throughout the southern United States, the species attics and sheds, under bridges (e.g., highway overpasses), has been seen throughout the entire state of Florida with under barrel roof tiles, and in bat houses. Less commonly the exception of the Florida Keys (Figure 2). They are they can be found roosting in palm trees. highly gregarious, living in large congregations. 1. This document is WEC379, one of a series of the Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date October 2016. Reviewed October 2019. Visit the EDIS website at https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu for the currently supported version of this publication. 2. Holly K. Ober, associate professor and wildlife Extension specialist, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation; Terry Doonan, mammal conservation coordinator, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; and Emily Evans, mammal conservation biologist, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611. -
Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA Evolution: a Comparison of the Cytochrome B and Cytochrome C Oxidase II Genes
J Mol Evol (1995) 40:260-272 jouRA,oMOLECULAR VOLUTION © Springer-VerlagNew York Inc. 1995 Mammalian Mitochondrial DNA Evolution: A Comparison of the Cytochrome b and Cytochrome c Oxidase II Genes Rodney L. Honeycutt,1 Michael A. Nedbal, 1 Ronald M. Adkins, 1'* Laura L. Janecek 1'2 i Department of Wildlife & Fisheries Sciences, Texas A&M University, 210 Nagle Hall, College Station, TX 77843, USA 2 Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia, Aiken, SC 29801, USA Received: 10 June 1994 / Accepted: 10 October 1994 Abstract. The evolution of two mitochondrial genes, Introduction cytochrome b and cytochrome c oxidase subunit II, was examined in several eutherian mammal orders, with spe- The mitochondrial cytochrome b (COB) and cytochrome cial emphasis on the orders Artiodactyla and Rodentia. c oxidase subunit II (COII) genes have been used in When analyzed using both maximum parsimony, with several recent molecular systematic studies of rodents either equal or unequal character weighting, and neigh- (DeWalt et al. 1993; Ma et al. 1993; Thomas and Martin bor joining, neither gene performed with a high degree of 1993), ungulates (Irwin et al. 1991; Irwin and Wilson consistency in terms of the phylogenetic hypotheses sup- 1992; Miyamoto et al. 1994), marine mammals (Irwin ported. The phylogenetic inconsistencies observed for and Arnason 1994), primates (Ruvolo et al. 1991; Diso- both these genes may be the result of several factors tell et al. 1992; Adkins and Honeycutt 1994), and euthe- including differences in the rate of nucleotide substitu- rian mammal orders (Adkins and Honeycutt 1991, 1993; tion among particular lineages (especially between or- Honeycutt and Adldns 1993). -
Pocket Gophers Habitat Modification
Summary of Damage Prevention and Control Methods POCKET GOPHERS HABITAT MODIFICATION Rotate to annual crops Apply herbicides to control tap‐rooted plants for 2 consecutive years Flood land Rotate or cover crop with grasses, grains, or other fibrous‐rooted plants EXCLUSION Figure 1. Plains pocket gopher. Photo by Ron Case. Small wire‐mesh fences may provide protection for ornamental trees and shrubs or flower beds Plastic netting to protect seedlings Protect pipes and underground cables with pipes at least 3 inches in diameter or surround them with 6 to 8 inches of coarse gravel. FRIGHTENING Nothing effective REPELLENTS None practical Figure 2. Pocket gophers get their name from the pouches TOXICANTS on the sides of their head. Image by PCWD. Zinc phosphide Chlorophacinone OBJECTIVES 1. Describe basic pocket gopher biology and FUMIGANTS behavior 2. Identify pocket gopher signs Aluminum phosphide and gas cartridges 3. Explain different methods to control pocket gophers SHOOTING white, but generally align with soil coloration. The great variability in size and color of pocket gophers is Not practical attributed to their low dispersal rate and limited gene flow, resulting in adaptations to local TRAPPING conditions. Thirty‐five species of pocket gophers, represented by Various specialized body‐grip traps 5 genera occupy the western hemisphere. Fourteen Baited box traps species and 3 genera exist in the US. The major features differentiating these genera are the size of SPECIES PROFILE their forefeet, claws, and front surfaces of their chisel‐like incisors. Southeastern pocket gopher (Geomys pinetis) is the only species occurring in IDENTIFICATION Alabama. Pocket gophers are so named because they have fur‐ Geomys (Figure 3) have 2 grooves on each upper lined pouches outside of the mouth, one on each incisor and large forefeet and claws. -
Biology and Ecology of Bat Cave, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona
R.B. Pape – Biology and ecology of Bat Cave, Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, v. XX, no. X, p. 000–000. DOI: 10.4311/2012LSC0266 BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF BAT CAVE, GRAND CANYON NATIONAL PARK, ARIZONA ROBERT B. PAPE Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, [email protected] Abstract: A study of the biology and ecology of Bat Cave, Grand Canyon National Park, was conducted during a series of four expeditions to the cave between 1994 and 2001. A total of 27 taxa, including 5 vertebrate and 22 macro-invertebrate species, were identified as elements of the ecology of the cave. Bat Cave is the type locality for Eschatomoxys pholeter Thomas and Pape (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and an undescribed genus of tineid moth, both of which were discovered during this study. Bat Cave has the most species-rich macro-invertebrate ecology currently known in a cave in the park. INTRODUCTION Cave. A review of cave-invertebrate studies in the park, which included 9 reports addressing 16 caves, was prepared This paper documents the results of a biological and by Wynne et al. (2007). Their compilation resulted in a list ecological analysis of Bat Cave on the Colorado River of approximately 37 species of cave macro-invertebrates within Grand Canyon National Park conducted during currently known from caves there. Wynne and others have four expeditions to the cave between 1994 and 2001. The recently performed invertebrate surveys in caves in the study focused on the macro-invertebrate elements present Grand Canyon–Parashant National Monument, and have in the cave and did not include any microbiological already encountered several undescribed cave-inhabiting sampling, identification, or analysis.