DOCSLIB.ORG

United Utilities Manchester Ship Canal Water Quality Review Part 1 of 2 (Primary Document)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Utilities Manchester Ship Canal Water Quality Review Part 1 of 2 (Primary Document) UNITED UTILITIES _________________________ MANCHESTER SHIP CANAL WATER QUALITY REVIEW PART 1 OF 2 (PRIMARY DOCUMENT) _________________________ FINAL REPORT September 2007 APEM REF: 410039 APEM Scientific Report 410039 CLIENT: United Utilities ADDRESS: Haweswater House, Lingley Mere Business Park, Lingley Green Avenue, Great Sankey, Warrington, WA5 3LP PROJECT No: 410039 DATE OF ISSUE: September 2007 PROJECT DIRECTOR: Dr. Keith Hendry PROJECT MANAGER: David Campbell, M.Sc. SENIOR SCIENTISTS: Dr Roger Baker Margaret-Rose Vogel Heather Webb Kathleen Beyer Riverview, Embankment Business Park, Heaton Mersey, Stockport, SK4 3GN Tel: 0161 442 8938 Fax: 0161 432 6083 Website: www.apemltd.co.uk Registered in England No. 2530851 Final Report – September 2007 ii APEM Scientific Report 410039 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................1 1.1 BACKGROUND TO WATER QUALITY WITHIN THE MSC ..............................................................1 1.2 SPECIFIC WATER QUALITY ISSUES OF THE MSC...........................................................................2 1.3 WATER QUALITY IN THE PRESENT DAY WITHIN THE MSC .........................................................3 1.4 INTRODUCTION TO DATA AVAILABILITY AND PREVIOUS WATER QUALITY REPORTS ...............4 1.4.1 Data Availability .................................................................................................................4 1.5 BACKGROUND TO PREVIOUS REPORTS REVIEWING THE WATER QUALITY OF THE MSC...........6 1.5.1 Academic reviews (1988-Present) ......................................................................................6 1.5.2 APEM Review (1990) in association with Watson Hawksley (now MWH) .......................7 1.5.3 Harper Review (2000).........................................................................................................7 2 REVIEW OF MSC WATER QUALITY DATA ...........................................................................9 2.1 BOD .............................................................................................................................................9 2.2 AMMONIA...................................................................................................................................12 2.3 DISSOLVED OXYGEN ..................................................................................................................14 2.4 SUSPENDED SOLIDS AND TRANSPARENCY..................................................................................17 2.5 NUTRIENTS (PHOSPHORUS)........................................................................................................17 2.6 BACTERIOLOGY..........................................................................................................................18 2.7 OTHER DATA ..............................................................................................................................19 2.7.1 Metals.................................................................................................................................19 2.7.2 pH.......................................................................................................................................19 2.7.3 Conductivity.......................................................................................................................20 2.7.4 Residual chlorine...............................................................................................................20 2.8 SEDIMENTS .................................................................................................................................20 2.9 KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................22 3 REVIEW OF MSC BIOLOGICAL DATA....................................................................................23 3.1 HISTORICAL REVIEW OF MACRO-INVERTEBRATE DATA ...................................................................23 3.1.1 Upper MSC ...............................................................................................................................23 3.1.2 River Inputs...............................................................................................................................24 3.1.3 Salford Quays ...........................................................................................................................26 3.2 HISTORICAL REVIEW OF ALGAL DATA ..............................................................................................26 3.3 KEY FINDINGS ..................................................................................................................................28 iii Final Report – September 2007 APEM Scientific Report 410039 Foreword This report details a review of water quality within the Manchester Ship Canal and is the product of an extensive data and literature search. The primary section of the document provides a summary of important data and discusses the associated relevant issues. Detailed descriptions of the data used along with various graphs and charts are presented in an associated technical document (Appendix document). iv Final Report – September 2007 APEM Scientific Report 410039 1 INTRODUCTION The Manchester Ship Canal (MSC) was opened in 1894 creating a major freight access corridor into the heart of industrial Manchester. It extends some 35 miles (56km), from the River Mersey at Eastham to Manchester Docks. Following a decline in shipping use, Manchester Docks (now renamed Salford Quays) eventually closed as a shipping port in 1984, leading to severe urban decline in the area. Subsequent regeneration in Salford Quays from the 1987 onwards has since led to a thriving area of intense development with the Quays currently playing host to modern apartment buildings, office developments and art and cultural centres. The shift from deprivation and decline in the Quays area to its current prosperity is inextricably linked to the history of water quality within the Manchester Ship Canal. This review is specifically concerned with the changes in water quality of the MSC and Salford Quays over the past three plus decades (for which survey data were available), along with development of the ecology of the phytoplankton, periphytic diatoms, and benthic macro-invertebrate communities present in this system. It was prepared for United Utilities as part of a wider investigation into the water quality of the Manchester Ship Canal (MSC), within the context of the European Community Freshwater Fish Directive (EC FFD). Crucially, the MSC has been designated under the directive as a cyprinid fishery from the River Irwell near Salford University to the freshwater limit of the Canal at Latchford Locks (22km of the MSC). The quality of water in the MSC does not currently meet the EC FFD standards, which has ultimately been the impetus behind this study. The objective of this review is to summarise the extent of the water quality monitoring that has been conducted on the MSC and Salford Quays and to discuss the changes that have taken place in the aquatic environment of these water bodies over the preceding decades. 1.1 Background to Water Quality Within the MSC The Manchester Ship Canal has experienced poor water quality since its construction. The overriding issues driving this are two fold; one that the Mersey catchment is arguably overpopulated and two; that as a water body the MSC is essentially too small for the catchment it serves. Regarding the first of these points, the Upper Mersey catchment encompasses large densely populated areas including the cities of Manchester and Salford which generate huge amounts of anthropogenic waste. This is particularly true of the River Irwell, that flows through the centre of Manchester and directly into the MSC at its upper extent. Over 90% of the Irwell’s dry weather flow is made up of combined sewage effluent from the various waste water treatment works (WwTWs) and industrial effluents along the river. In addition, the construction of the sewer network is such that during heavy rainfall events, the sewer system is occasionally unable to cope with the large volumes of water entering it, which bring about direct spills of untreated sewage from the combined sewage overflows (CSOs) (Rees and White 1993). During a CSO event untreated sewage is washed into the MSC, adding further to the dry 1 Final Report – September 2007 APEM Scientific Report 410039 weather pollutant load. This clearly presents severe water quality issues for the Ship Canal, but further to this, not only is the inflowing water extremely polluted, but as this water enters the MSC the physical nature of the Canal exacerbates the problem. The MSC receives water from a number of arguably heavily modified but reasonably natural rivers, including the Rivers Irwell, Irk, Medlock, Mersey and Bollin, which combine to give an average total inflow of over 3000 Megalitres (Ml) per day. However, the physical structure of the Canal fundamentally changes the flow regime of these rivers by slowing the flow, which has a profound effect upon water quality. The vertical walls and deep nature of the Canal (up to 9m) dramatically changes the hydraulic regime compared to that experienced in the inflowing rivers. The high residence time in the Canal means that pollutants are not readily flushed out and particulate contaminants can settle
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Beginner's Guide to Boating on Inland Waterways
    Ti r A Beginner’s Guide To Boating On Inland Waterways Take to the water with British Waterways and the National Rivers Authority With well over 4,000 km (2,500 miles) of rivers and canals to explore, from the south west of England up to Scotland, our inland waterways offer plenty of variety for both the casual boater and the dedicated enthusiast. If you have ever experienced the pleasures of 'messing about on boats', you will know what a wealth of scenery and heritage inland waterways open up to us, and the unique perspective they provide. Boating is fun and easy. This pack is designed to help you get afloat if you are thinking about buying a boat. Amongst other useful information, it includes details of: Navigation Authorities British Waterways (BW) and the National Rivers Authority (NRA), which is to become part of the new Environment Agency for England and Wales on 1 April 1996, manage most of our navigable rivers and canals. We are responsible for maintaining the waterways and locks, providing services for boaters and we licence and manage boats. There are more than 20 smaller navigation authorities across the country. We have included information on some of these smaller organisations. Licences and Moorings We tell you everything you need to know from, how to apply for a licence to how to find a permanent mooring or simply a place for «* ^ V.’j provide some useful hints on buying a boat, includi r, ...V; 'r 1 builders, loans, insurance and the Boat Safety Sch:: EKVIRONMENT AGENCY Useful addresses A detailed list of useful organisations and contacts :: : n a t io n a l libra ry'& ■ suggested some books we think will help you get t information service Happy boating! s o u t h e r n r e g i o n Guildbourne House, Chatsworth Road, W orthing, West Sussex BN 11 1LD ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 1 Owning a Boat Buying a Boat With such a vast.range of boats available to suit every price range, .
    [Show full text]
  • INLAND NAVIGATION AUTHORITIES the Following Authorities Are Responsible for Major Inland Waterways Not Under British Waterways Jurisdiction
    INLAND NAVIGATION AUTHORITIES The following authorities are responsible for major inland waterways not under British Waterways jurisdiction: RIVER ANCHOLME BRIDGEWATER CANAL CHELMER & BLACKWATER NAVIGATION The Environment Agency Manchester Ship Canal Co. Essex Waterways Ltd Anglian Region, Kingfisher House Peel Dome, Trafford Centre, Island House Goldhay Way, Orton Manchester M17 8PL Moor Road Peterborough PE2 5ZR T 0161 629 8266 Chesham T 08708 506 506 www.shipcanal.co.uk HP5 1WA www.environment-agency.gov.uk T: 01494 783453 BROADS (NORFOLK & SUFFOLK) www.waterways.org.uk/EssexWaterwaysLtd RIVER ARUN Broads Authority (Littlehampton to Arundel) 18 Colgate, Norwich RIVER COLNE Littlehampton Harbour Board Norfolk NR3 1BQ Colchester Borough Council Pier Road, Littlehampton, BN17 5LR T: 01603 610734 Museum Resource Centre T 01903 721215 www.broads-authority.gov.uk 14 Ryegate Road www.littlehampton.org.uk Colchester, CO1 1YG BUDE CANAL T 01206 282471 RIVER AVON (BRISTOL) (Bude to Marhamchurch) www.colchester.gov.uk (Bristol to Hanham Lock) North Cornwall District Council Bristol Port Company North Cornwall District Council, RIVER DEE St Andrew’s House, St Andrew’s Road, Higher Trenant Road, Avonmouth, Bristol BS11 9DQ (Farndon Bridge to Chester Weir) Wadebridge, T 0117 982 0000 Chester County Council PL27 6TW, www.bristolport.co.uk The Forum Tel: 01208 893333 Chester CH1 2HS http://www.ncdc.gov.uk/ RIVER AVON (WARWICKSHIRE) T 01244 324234 (tub boat canals from Marhamchurch) Avon Navigation Trust (Chester Weir to Point of Air) Bude Canal Trust
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns
    ‘Views Grim But Splendid’ - Te Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns A Roberts PhD 2016 ‘Views Grim But Splendid’ - Te Urban Image of North-West English Industrial Towns Amber Roberts o 2016 Contents 2 Acknowledgements 4 Abstract 5 21 01 Literature Review 53 02 Research Methods 81 Region’ 119 155 181 215 245 275 298 1 Acknowledgements 2 3 Abstract ‘What is the urban image of the north- western post-industrial town?’ 4 00 Introduction This research focuses on the urban image of North West English historic cultural images, the built environment and the growing the towns in art, urban planning and the built environment throughout case of Stockport. Tesis Introduction 5 urban development that has become a central concern in the towns. 6 the plans also engage with the past through their strategies towards interest in urban image has led to a visual approach that interrogates This allows a more nuanced understanding of the wider disseminated image of the towns. This focuses on the represented image of the and the wider rural areas of the Lancashire Plain and the Pennines. Tesis Introduction 7 restructuring the town in successive phases and reimagining its future 8 development of urban image now that the towns have lost their Tesis Introduction 9 Figure 0.1, showing the M60 passing the start of the River Mersey at Stockport, image author’s own, May 2013. 10 of towns in the North West. These towns have been in a state of utopianism. persistent cultural images of the North which the towns seek to is also something which is missing from the growing literature on Tesis Introduction 11 to compare the homogenous cultural image to the built environment models to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manchester Ship Canal and Salford Quays
    The Manchester Ship Canal and Salford Quays By Heather Webb, BSc (Hons) MSc, Senior Aquatic Scientist, APEM Limited. Manchester Ship Canal History The Manchester Ship Canal (MSC) was opened in 1894 and at the time, was the largest navigation in the world. The Canal is 58 km long, linking Eastham on the Mersey Estuary to Manchester, terminating upstream at the four docks in Salford (formerly known as Manchester Docks) and four smaller docks at Pomona (1 km upstream). The docks prospered and became one of Britain’s largest ports, reaching a peak in the 1950’s. During the second half of the twentieth century, however, containerisation and changing world trade patterns led to the demise of the docks and they were closed in 1984 leaving an abandoned 60 ha site including a polluted water course. Legacy Problems The industrial history associated with the Mersey Basin, Excessive bubbling encompassing the Rivers Mersey and Irwell and the MSC, left a legacy of poor water quality and sediment contamination. The MSC was one of the most severely polluted waterways in the UK with a one hundred year legacy of industrial, agricultural and sewage pollution. Water quality was very poor, being characterised by low Sediment rafts water column dissolved oxygen, high levels of suspended organic material and elevated nutrient concentrations. There was also excessive gas production from the anoxic sediments which produced foul odours and lifted mats of sediment to the surface, both of which acted as a serious deterrent to waterside development. The structure of the MSC (deep, slow flowing and with steep vertical sides) further exacerbated the water quality problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Source 12 AW.Indd
    Words Deborah Mulhearn Photographs Ian Lawson, Walter Menzies and courtesy British Waterways Cheshire’s beautiful and fascinating canals are at the forefront of the nation’s canal renaissance. Cheshire’s canals are perhaps the most diverse in the ago – to young and distinctly urban The Peak Forest Canal touches country. From the fascinating industrial heritage of the landlubbers are negotiating the locks. Boating Cheshire only briefl y, but has one of mighty Manchester Ship Canal, which cuts across the holiday companies are doing great business. its most spectacular features: the Northern edge of the county, to the dramatic Pennine The Cheshire Ring, a 97 mile long circular Marple Aqueduct and the fl ight of 16 scenery of the Macclesfi eld Canal in the east, and the route which is made up from parts of the locks that lift the canal 46m above serene beauty of the Llangollen Canal in the south-west Macclesfi eld Canal, the Peak Forest Canal, the Goyt Valley. The Trent & Mersey corner, they not only cover most of the county but also the Bridgewater Canal and the Trent & Mersey Canal, built to link the River Trent span the history of British canal building. Canal, has never been busier. and the River Mersey, was one of the Cheshire’s proximity to Liverpool and Manchester, “There’s a weird and wonderful mix of earliest canals to be completed, in the hub and heart of the industrial revolution, and to the features specifi c to Cheshire’s canals,” 1777. It runs for 92 miles and has River Mersey, meant that it was quickly criss-crossed explains Peter Birch of British Waterways even more locks – one section with by canals in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Greater Manchester
    Exploring Greater Manchester a fieldwork guide Web edition edited by Paul Hindle Original printed edition (1998) edited by Ann Gardiner, Paul Hindle, John McKendrick and Chris Perkins Exploring Greater Manchester 5 5. Urban floodplains and slopes: the human impact on the environment in the built-up area Ian Douglas University of Manchester [email protected] A. The River Mersey STOP 1: Millgate Lane, Didsbury The urban development of Manchester has modified From East Didsbury station and the junction of the A34 runoff to rivers (see Figure 1), producing changes in and A5145, proceed south along Parrs Wood Road and into flood behaviour, which have required expensive remedial Millgate Lane, Stop at the bridge over the floodbasin inlet measures, particularly, the embankment of the Mersey from channel at Grid Reference (GR) 844896 (a car can be turned Stockport to Ashton weir near Urmston. In this embanked round at the playing fields car park further on). Looking reach, runoff from the urban areas includes natural channels, south from here the inlet channel from the banks of the storm drains and overflows from combined sewers. Mersey can be seen. At flood times the gates of the weir on Alternative temporary storages for floodwaters involve the Mersey embankment can be opened to release water into release of waters to floodplain areas as in the Didsbury flood the Didsbury flood basin that lies to the north. Here, and at basin and flood storage of water in Sale and Chorlton water other sites along the Mersey, evidence of multi-purpose use parks. This excursion examines the reach of the Mersey from of the floodplain, for recreation and wildlife conservation as Didsbury to Urmston.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Improvements Across the Manchester Ship Canal Catchment
    Environmental improvements across the Manchester Ship Canal catchment 1. Table of contents 1. Table of contents ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Glossary of terms ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 3. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1. Purpose of this document .................................................................................................................................................. 3 3.2. Structure of this document ................................................................................................................................................ 4 3.3. Assurance of this submission ............................................................................................................................................. 4 4. The case for acceleration ................................................................................................................................................. 5 4.1. Vision ................................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 5. Evidence of need ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Energy River: Realising Energy Potential from the River Mersey
    The Energy River: Realising Energy Potential from the River Mersey June 2017 Amani Becker, Andy Plater Department of Geography and Planning, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZT Judith Wolf National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool L3 5DA This page has been intentionally left blank ii Acknowledgements The work herein has been funded jointly by the University of Liverpool’s Knowledge Exchange and Impact Voucher Scheme and Liverpool City Council. The contribution of those involved in the project through Liverpool City Council, Christine Darbyshire, and Liverpool City Region LEP, James Johnson and Mark Knowles, is gratefully acknowledged. The contribution of Michela de Dominicis of the National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool, for her work producing a tidal array scenario for the Mersey Estuary is also acknowledged. Thanks also to the following individuals approached during the timeframe of the project: John Eldridge (Cammell Laird), Jack Hardisty (University of Hull), Neil Johnson (Liverpool City Council) and Sue Kidd (University of Liverpool). iii This page has been intentionally left blank iv Executive summary This report has been commissioned by Liverpool City Council (LCC) and joint-funded through the University of Liverpool’s Knowledge Exchange and Impact Voucher Scheme to explore the potential to obtain renewable energy from the River Mersey using established and emerging technologies. The report presents an assessment of current academic literature and the latest industry reports to identify suitable technologies for generation of renewable energy from the Mersey Estuary, its surrounding docks and Liverpool Bay. It also contains a review of energy storage technologies that enable cost-effective use of renewable energy. The review is supplemented with case studies where technologies have been implemented elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • PART 3 Scale 1: Publication Edition Scale 1: Publication Edition Scale 1: Publication Edition 44 W Nose of Howth to Ballyquintin Point 100,000 Oct
    Natural Date of New Natural Date of New Natural Date of New Chart No. Title of Chart or Plan Chart No. Title of Chart or Plan Chart No. Title of Chart or Plan PART 3 Scale 1: Publication Edition Scale 1: Publication Edition Scale 1: Publication Edition 44 w Nose of Howth to Ballyquintin Point 100,000 Oct. 1978 Feb. 2001 1468w Arklow to the Skerries Islands 100,000 Aug. 1978 June 1999 1977w Holyhead to Great Ormes Head 75,000 Feb. 1977 Oct. 2001 105 w Cromer Knoll and the Outer Banks 75,000 Apr. 1974 Jan. 2010 1484w Plans in Cardigan Bay - Mar. 1985 Jan. 2002 1978w Great Ormes Head to Liverpool 75,000 Jan. 1977 May 2009 106 w Cromer to Smiths Knoll 75,000 Oct. 1974 Sept. 2010 A Aberystwyth 18,000 1981w Liverpool to Fleetwood including Approaches to Preston 75,000 Feb. 1977 May 2009 107 w Approaches to the River Humber 75,000 July 1975 May 2009 B Aberdovey 25,000 Preston Riversway Docklands 10,000 108 w Approaches to the Wash 75,000 June 1975 Apr. 2011 C Barmouth 25,000 2010wI Morecambe Bay and Approaches 50,000 Feb. 1988 July 2006 Wells-Next-The-Sea 30,000 D Fishguard Bay 15,000 2011w Holyhead Harbour 6,250 May 1975 Aug. 2005 109 wI River Humber and the Rivers Ouse and Trent 50,000 Dec. 1990 May 2009 E New Quay 12,500 2013w Saint Bees Head to Silloth 50,000 Feb. 1987 July 2010 A Humber Bridge to Whitton Ness 50,000 F Aberaeron 18,000 A Silloth Docks and Approaches 10,000 B3 B Whitton Ness to Goole and Keadby 50,000 G Newport Bay 37,500 B Maryport Harbour 10,000 C Keadby to Gainsborough 100,000 H Approaches to Cardigan 37,500 C Workington Harbour 7,500 D Goole 5,000 J Aberporth 30,000 D Harrington Harbour 10,000 111 w Berwick-upon-Tweed to the Farne Islands 35,000 July 1975 July 2009 1503wI Outer Dowsing to Smiths Knoll including Indefatigable Banks 150,000 Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Assisted Area Status Further Info
    CH65 4FW FOR SALE A prime development opportunity in a key waterside location Three sites comprising up to 4.33 ha (10.7 acres) for commercial and leisure use ENTER Home Overview Ellesmere Port Location Description Assisted Area Status Further Info SAT NAV: CH65 4FW National Waterways Museum LEISURE Site 1 Manchester Ship Canal Up to 1.43ha (3.53 acres) EMPLOYMENT Site 2 1.65ha (4.08 acres) M53 J9 LEISURE/ EMPLOYMENT Oil Sites RoadCanalside Three sites comprising up to Site 3 4.33 ha (10.7 acres) are available in Up to 1.24ha a key waterside location. (3.06 acres) A prime development opportunity in a great location with excellent connectivity from Junction 9 M53 B&Q and access to over 10 million consumers within 1 hours drive. To M56 Potential for a range of uses, & Chester particularly leisure and commercial. Home Overview Ellesmere Port Location Description Assisted Area Status Further Info • The sites are located immediately off Junction 9 of the M53 Motorway with an average of 29,000 vehicles passing every day. • The sites are accessed via Oil Sites Road and are adjacent to the National Waterways Museum, Shropshire Union Canal & Manchester Ship Canal. • Ellesmere Port waterfront boasts extensive views across the Mersey Estuary to Liverpool and the Runcorn Bridge within a unique heritage setting. • A working, historic, canal side dock in a conservation area • Most complete inland dock complex in the UK • Direct canal & motorway links to Cheshire Oaks, Chester Zoo and Blue Planet Aquarium • Established hotel and restaurant destination
    [Show full text]
  • Canals and Railways in the Industrial Revolution Tour | Tours for Seniors in Britain
    Australia 1300 888 225 New Zealand 0800 440 055 [email protected] From $13,995 AUD Single Room $15,995 AUD Twin Room $13,995 AUD Prices valid until 30th December 2021 23 days Duration England Destination Level 2 - Moderate Activity Canals and Railways in the Industrial Revolution Tour | Tours for Seniors in Britain Oct 05 2021 to Oct 27 2021 An Industrial Revolution Tour for Seniors | Exploring Britain’s history through its canals and railways This small group tour uncovers British history through the canals and railways of the Industrial Revolution. Learn how the Industrial Revolution brought significant and lasting change to Britain. Discover how engineers overcame geographical obstacles using viaducts, bridges, aqueducts, tunnels, and locks. Witness first hand the groundbreaking technology and the many impressive structures that transformed Canals and Railways in the Industrial Revolution Tour | Tours for Seniors in Britain 30-Sep-2021 1/15 https://www.odysseytraveller.com.au Australia 1300 888 225 New Zealand 0800 440 055 [email protected] Britain’s economy, some now restored for recreational purposes. However, our tour program is not only a study of the physical impact such a fundamental change made to world history. Led by local guides selected for their expertise, we also provide the opportunity to examine and discuss the resulting social upheaval. Packed to the brim with history, culture, and striking scenery, Great Britain and Ireland have a lot to offer the traveller. Our small group tour of the British isles are perfect for the mature or senior traveller who wants to explore the history of Britain and Ireland as part of an intimate guided tour with an expert local guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Mersey Estuary Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 Managing Flood Risk We Are the Environment Agency
    Mersey Estuary Catchment Flood Management Plan Summary Report December 2009 managing flood risk We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. Your environment is the air you breathe, the water you drink and the ground you walk on. Working with business, Government and society as a whole, we are making your environment cleaner and healthier. The Environment Agency. Out there, making your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Richard Fairclough House Knutsford Road Warrington WA4 1HT Tel: 0870 8506506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. December 2009 Introduction I am pleased to introduce our summary of the Mersey Estuary Catchment Flood Management Plan (CFMP). This CFMP gives an overview of the flood risk in the Mersey Estuary catchment and sets out our preferred plan for sustainable flood risk management over the next 50 to 100 years. The Mersey Estuary CFMP is one of 77 CFMPs for have a 1% chance of flooding in any one year from rivers England and Wales. Through the CFMPs, we have (i.e. a 1% annual probability). We estimate that by 2100 assessed inland flood risk across all of England and approximately 25,000 properties will be at risk of river Wales for the first time. The CFMP considers all types of flooding. This is a 30% increase compared to the current inland flooding, from rivers, groundwater, surface water number at risk across the catchment.
    [Show full text]