Protection of Civilians – Weekly Briefing Notes
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sabeel Wave of Prayer
abeel Wave of Prayer July 9th, 2020 S This prayer ministry enables local and international friends of Sabeel to pray over regional concerns on a weekly basis. Sent to Sabeel’s network of supporters, the prayer is used in services around the world and during Sabeel’s Thursday Communion service; as each community in its respective time zone lifts these concerns in prayer at noon every Thursday, this “wave of prayer” washes over the world. In Week 38 of the Kumi Now Initiative (Tuesday 7th July) the topic of Morally Responsible Investing was discussed with Sabeel-Kairos UK. On Tuesday 14th July there will be the opportunity to listen to the Israeli NGO Zochrot on the topic of Right of Return and the Jewish National Fund. (www.kuminow.com/online ) · Dear Lord, we thank you for those who are willing to express their support for the legitimate struggle for justice and peace through their financial investments. Lord, in your mercy… Hear our prayer. As Covid19 continues to affect populations throughout the world, we see a further rise in cases in both Palestine and Israel. With around 1000 cases daily, Israel is at a peak higher than that seen at the beginning of the pandemic with lockdowns and restrictions starting to be reintroduced. The West Bank was locked down from Friday 3rd July for a period of five days, but this may be extended as hundreds of cases are reported in the Hebron area and in the refugee camps of Bethlehem. · Lord, we pray for all those around the world who are affected by this pandemic, especially for the medical and emergency services who continue to place themselves at great risk to treat the sickest patients. -
At Tabaqa & Wadih Village Profile
At Tabaqa & Wadih Village Profile Prepared by The Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem Funded by Spanish Cooperation Azahar program 2009 Palestinian Localities Study Hebron Governorate Acknowledgments ARIJ hereby expresses its deep gratitude to the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID) for their funding of this project through the Azahar Program. ARIJ is grateful to the Palestinian officials in the ministries, municipalities, joint services councils, village committees and councils, and the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) for their assistance and cooperation with the project team members during the data collection process. ARIJ also thanks all the staff who worked throughout the past couple of years towards the accomplishment of this work. 1 Palestinian Localities Study Hebron Governorate Background This booklet is part of a series of booklets, which contain compiled information about each city, town, and village in Hebron Governorate. These booklets come as a result of a comprehensive study of all localities in Hebron Governorate, which aims at depicting the overall living conditions in the governorate and presenting developmental plans to assist in developing the livelihood of the population in the area. It was accomplished through the 'Village Profiles and Azahar Needs Assessment'; a project funded by the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID) and the Azahar Program. The 'Village Profiles and Azahar Needs Assessment' was designed to study, investigate, analyze and document the socio-economic conditions and the needed programs and activities to mitigate the impact of the current unsecure political, economic and social conditions in Hebron Governorate with particular focus on the Azahar program objectives and activities concerning water, environment, and agriculture. -
Khursa Village Profile
Khursa Village Profile Prepared by The Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem Funded by Spanish Cooperation Azahar program November 2007 Palestinian Localities Study Hebron Governorate Table of Content Location and Physical Characteristics _________________________2 History___________________________________________________3 Demography and Population _________________________________3 Economy _________________________________________________4 Education ________________________________________________6 Health Status _____________________________________________7 Religious and Archaeological Sites ____________________________8 Institutions and Services ____________________________________8 Infrastructure and Natural Resources__________________________9 Agricultural Sector _________________________________________9 Impact of Israeli Occupation ________________________________11 Development Plans and Projects _____________________________12 Locality Development Priorities and Needs_____________________12 1 Palestinian Localities Study Hebron Governorate Khursa Village Profile Location and Physical Characteristics Khursa is a Palestinian village in Dura area which is located 20 km northwest of Hebron city in the southern part of the West Bank. It is bordered by Tarrama village to the east, Dura city to the north, As Sura and Imreish to the south and the Front Line Villages to the west. Map 1: Khursa village location and boundaries The total area of Khursa village is approximately 5,000 dunums. 600 dunums are classified as built-up areas, 2,650 -
Bethlehem Governorate
ARAB STUDIES SOCIETY Land Suitability for Reclamation, Rangeland and Forestation - Bethlehem Governorate Silwan Al 'EizariyaMaale Adummim Land Research Center Ath Thuri This study is implemented by: Abu Dis Land Research Center - LRC East Talpiyot Mizpe Yedude Funded by: As Sawahira al Gharbiya Kedar The Italian Cooperation Beit Safafa As Sawahira ash Sharqiya Administrated by: Givat Hamatos January 2010 Ash Sheikh Sa'd United Nations Development Program UNDP / PAPP Gilo Sur Bhir WWW.LRCJ.ORG GIS & Mapping Unit Al Walaja Supervised by: Palestinian Ministry of Agriculture Har Gilo Har Homa Battir Al 'Ubeidiya Beit Jala Dar Salah Jenin Hadar Betar Husan Al Khas Beit Sahur Tulkarm Tubas Bethlehem Betar Illit Ad DohaAd Duheisha Camp Qalqiliya Nablus Artas Salfit Nahhalin Al Khushna Gavaot Neve Daniyyel Jericho Ramallah Hindaza Za'tara Rosh Zurim Al 'Iqab Efrat Jerusalem Bet Ain (Tsoref) Elazar El David (Kfar Eldad) & Izdebar Allon Shevut Surif Tekoa (includin Tekoa C,D) Bethlehem Kfar Etzion Jurat ash Sham'a Khirbet ad Deir Tuqu' Nokdim Safa Migdal Oz Hebron Beit Fajjar Beit Ummar Al 'Arrub Camp Kharas Shuyukh al 'Arrub Nuba Karmei Zur Beit Ula Legend Maale Amos Asfar ( Mitzad) Annexation & Expansion Wall Mitzad Shimon Sa'ir Governorates Boundaries Tarqumiya Halhul Ash Shuyukh Roads Network Beit Kahil Qafan al Khamis 'Arab ar Rashayida Palestinian Builtup Area Telem Idhna Israeli Colonies Ad Duwwara Adora Lands suitable for rangeland Ramat Mamre (Kharsine) Lands suitable for forestation Taffuh Suitability for Reclamation Hebron Qiryat Arbaa' Most suitable Kureise Abraham Afeno Hebron Jewish Quarter Highly suitable Deir Samit Bani Na'im Moderately suitable Dura · Beit 'Awwa Bethlehem Governorate 1:110,000 Mirshalem West Bank Negohot 0 2 4 8 Khursa Hagai Maale Havar (Pene Hever) Kilometers. -
Khalil Tumar.Pdf
Faculty of Graduate Studies Institute of Environmental and Water Studies M.Sc. Program in Water and Environmental Engineering M.SC. THESIS A STUDY ON THE AVAILABLE OPTIONS FOR MITIGATING WATER SCARCITY IN THE HEBRON DISTRICT, PALESTINE SUBMITTED BY: KHALIL TUMAR STUDENT NUMBER 1105479 SUPERVISOR DR. MAHER ABU-MADI This thesis was submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the Degree of Masters in Water and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Graduate Studies at Birzeit University, Palestine. APRIL, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENT Summary………………………………………………………………………………. 5 6 .……………………………………………………………………………….. الخﻻصة Dedication ...………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………... 8 List of Abbreviations ...……………………………………………………………….. 9 List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………... 10 List of Tables …………………………………………………………………………. 11 Chapter One: Introduction……………………………………………………………. 12 1.1 Overview ………………………………………………….. 12 1.2 Statement of the Problem …………………………………. 13 1.3 Research Questions………………………………………... 14 1.4 Aim and Objectives……………………………………….. 14 1.5 Significance of the Study………………………………….. 14 1.6 Approach and Methodology………………………………. 15 1.7 Hypothesis..……………………………………………….. 15 1.8 Thesis Outline ..…………………………………………... 16 Chapter Two: The Study Area: The Hebron District……..…………………...……… 17 2.1 Location …………………… …………………………….. 17 2.2 Climate ……………………………………………………. 19 2.3 Temperature ……………………………...……………….. 19 2.4 Land Use ………………………....……………………….. 19 2.5 Demography ………………………………………………. 19 2.6 Water situation in -
Palestina Tent of Nations Theme: Peace and Disarmament Location
Palestina Tent of Nations Theme : Peace and disarmament Location : Nahalin (near Bethlehem), Palestine Work starts : Ongoing Application : Feedback within 2 weeks. A copy of the applica- tions to this project have to be sent to MIDI WG. Period : Minimum stay is 1 month, maximum is 3 months (visa expiration) between March 15 – November 15. Vacancies : 1 Languages: # Project: English,German,Arabic # Local: Arabic Short description: The project aims at bringing people with different backgrounds together, to learn from each other and to try to understand each other. The situation in Palestine plays a central role. Over 15 years the family fights in a peaceful way to prevent confiscation of a threatened piece of land. Foreign volunteers play an important role by showing international presence, by helping to cultivate and work the land and by providing information about the project back home. Next to that activities are organized for local youth to give them the possibility to enjoy a day outside their daily problems. Notice : This project is proposed by the MIDI working group of SCI. There are specific rules regarding the age of the volunteer and the application process. Please contact the SCI branch, group or partner organization in your country for further information. Detailed Information : Work: The work takes place on 'Daher's Wineyard'; the land of Tent of Nations. The work will consist of farm work like planting trees, watering plants, cleaning pieces of land, harvesting (tomatoes, grapes, olives, almonds, etc), caring for the animals, helping in the kitchen, creating (wall) painting as well as improving the infrastructure on the land (renovations, building of structures, digging new wells, cleaning caves, etc). -
Additional Background Information on Tent of Nations Tent of Nations Is A
Additional Background Information on Tent of Nations Tent of Nations is a peace project located on a farm owned for over 100 years by the Nassar family, located 6 miles southwest of Bethlehem in the occupied Palestinian territories. Situated in Area C under Israeli administrative and security control, the farm is located on a hilltop surrounded by Israeli settlements.[1] In 2001, the Nassar family named their farm Tent of Nations, receivinG visitors from around the world to foster a connection between the land and people. The farm is dedicated to sustainable aGriculture and hosts proGrams for women and children from the area. In 2019, the number of international visitors was close to 10,000. Tent of Nations is supported by church and religious orGanizations in the U.S.A. and Europe, who host visits to the farm, help support Tent of Nations’ educational and peacebuildinG proGrams, and sponsor volunteers who live and work on the farm. Since 2001, Tent of Nations has been a place where “people from many different countries come toGether to learn, to share, and to build bridGes of understandinG and hope.” In 1991, the Israeli authorities declared the farm and surroundinG area “state land.” Since then, the Nassar family has been in the Israeli Military Court and, ultimately, the Israeli Supreme Court defendinG their land from the demolition of farm buildinGs, water cisterns, and tents and from outriGht confiscation. in 2006, the Israeli Supreme Court ruled that the Nassars could beGin the re-reGistration process of their property required by Israel of landowners in Area C. -
A Case of Israeli “Democratic Colonialism”31
73 “The Frontier is where the Jews Live”: A Case of Israeli “Democratic Colonialism”31 Nicola Perugini32 The frontier is where Jews live, not where there is a line on the map. Golda Meir Space and law, or rather the space of law and law applied to space were among the primary elements of Israeli colonial sovereignty in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and of the forms of subjugation it employs to express this force. Through colonial practices that have systematically violated the borders of the very same international legislation that enabled ‘temporary’ Israeli occupation, and through the legal regularization of these violations, the landscape of the OPT has been gradually transformed into a legal arena in which colonial sovereignty works by means of a mixed system involving the application –and mutual integration– of increasingly complex laws and constant ‘innovations’ in government instruments and practices affecting Palestinian movements and areas. This historical process has become even more evident after the Oslo Accords, when the institutionalization of the separation between Israelis and Palestinians –without decolonization33– resulted in increased Israeli compartmentalization of the Palestinian landscape and the refinement of its techniques in doing so. Like other colonized peoples, the Palestinians do not live so much in a real system of “suspended sovereignty” (Kimmerling 1982: 200) as in a situation where Israeli colonial sovereignty is continuously undergoing refinement, in a spatial and peripheral frontier in which the colonial encounter (Evans 2009) is the moment of the creation, application and re-activation of the colonial order. In such a context, what is interesting is not so much the question of the legality or illegality of the practices and rules that reify the occupation so much as that of their logic and of how they came into being through space. -
Gaza Strip West Bank
Afula MAP 3: Land Swap Option 3 Zububa Umm Rummana Al-Fahm Mt. Gilboa Land Swap: Israeli to Palestinian At-Tayba Silat Al-Harithiya Al Jalama Anin Arrana Beit Shean Land Swap: Palestinian to Israeli Faqqu’a Al-Yamun Umm Hinanit Kafr Dan Israeli settlements Shaked Al-Qutuf Barta’a Rechan Al-Araqa Ash-Sharqiya Jenin Jalbun Deir Abu Da’if Palestinian communities Birqin 6 Ya’bad Kufeirit East Jerusalem Qaffin Al-Mughayyir A Chermesh Mevo No Man’s Land Nazlat Isa Dotan Qabatiya Baqa Arraba Ash-Sharqiya 1967 Green Line Raba Misiliya Az-Zababida Zeita Seida Fahma Kafr Ra’i Illar Mechola Barrier completed Attil Ajja Sanur Aqqaba Shadmot Barrier under construction B Deir Meithalun Mechola Al-Ghusun Tayasir Al-Judeida Bal’a Siris Israeli tunnel/Palestinian Jaba Tubas Nur Shams Silat overland route Camp Adh-Dhahr Al-Fandaqumiya Dhinnaba Anabta Bizzariya Tulkarem Burqa El-Far’a Kafr Yasid Camp Highway al-Labad Beit Imrin Far’un Avne Enav Ramin Wadi Al-Far’a Tammun Chefetz Primary road Sabastiya Talluza Beit Lid Shavei Shomron Al-Badhan Tayibe Asira Chemdat Deir Sharaf Roi Sources: See copyright page. Ash-Shamaliya Bekaot Salit Beit Iba Elon Moreh Tire Ein Beit El-Ma Azmut Kafr Camp Kafr Qaddum Deir Al-Hatab Jammal Kedumim Nablus Jit Sarra Askar Salim Camp Chamra Hajja Tell Balata Tzufim Jayyus Bracha Camp Beit Dajan Immatin Kafr Qallil Rujeib 2 Burin Qalqiliya Jinsafut Asira Al Qibliya Beit Furik Argaman Alfe Azzun Karne Shomron Yitzhar Itamar Mechora Menashe Awarta Habla Maale Shomron Immanuel Urif Al-Jiftlik Nofim Kafr Thulth Huwwara 3 Yakir Einabus -
Palestine Before the Elections
Poll No. 97 | April 2021 Poll No. 97 April 2021 Palestine before the elections 1 Poll No. 97 | April 2021 Barghouthi ahead of Abu Mazen in presidential race while Fatah ahead of Hamas in PLC race Ramallah – Results of the most recent public opinion poll conducted by the Jerusalem Media and Communication Center (JMCC) in cooperation with Friedrich Ebert Stiftung showed imprisoned Marwan Barghouthi holds an advantage over President Abu Mazen if presidential elections are held as long as runners in the elections are limited to these two candidates, alongside Ismail Haniyeh. The results of the poll, which was held between April 3 and 13, showed that 33.5% of respondents would vote for Marwan Barghouthi while 24.5% would vote for Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen), 10.5% would vote for Ismail Haniyeh and 31.5% said they still had no answer. Meanwhile, 60.2% said they supported the idea of Marwan Barghouthi running for president, while 19.3% said they did not support the idea. Importance of holding elections The majority of respondents, 79.2%, said it was important to hold legislative elections in Palestine as opposed to 14.3% who said it was not important. Nonetheless, the biggest majority, 44.4% said they believed the declared elections would be postponed, as opposed to 38.6% who said they expected them to be held on time. Regarding the integrity of the upcoming elections, 28.4% responded they believed they would be fair while 35.2% said they would be somewhat fair and 27.1% said they did not think they would be fair at all. -
Summary of Consultation on Effects of the COVID-19 on Women in Palestine
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics A Summary of Statistical Indicators on Women in Palestine during the Covid19 Crises Most Vulnerable Women Segments Around 10,745 women Health care health system workers and a total of 31,873 workers men and women 900 women working in workers in Palestine Women working in Israel Israel and settlements and settelements mostly in agriculture 175891 total females with chronic Women with Chronic disease 69,112 women suffer from at least one Chronic Disease (60+) Disease The percentage of poverty Female Childen with disease 9,596 female among households headed children with chronic by women in 2017 was 19% in the WB and 54% in Poor women Gaza Strip Elderly women In 2020 there are 140 287 60+ women 92,584 women heading households (61241 WB, Women Heading households 31343 Gaza Strip – 41,017 of highest in Jericho women have Women with disabilities at least one type of disability 1 Social Characteristics 1. The elderly (the most vulnerable group) • The number of elderly people (60+ years) in the middle of 2020 is around 269,346, (5.3% women, 140,287, and 129,059 men) • The percentage of elderly in Palestine was 5.0% of the total population in 2017 (5.4% for the elderly females, 4.6% for the elderly males), and in the West Bank it is higher than in the Gaza Strip (5.4 % In the West Bank and 4.3% in the Gaza Strip). • At the governorate level, the highest percentage of elderly people was in the governorates of Tulkarm, Ramallah, Al-Bireh, Bethlehem, and Jerusalem (6.5%, 6.0%, 6.0%, and 5.9%, respectively). -
Bethlehem Factsheet.Indd
Geopolitical Status of Bethlehem Governorate Jabal (mountain) Abu Ghneim, which sits opposite the town of Beit Sahour, was classified until 1991 as a “green area” by the Israeli occupying state, when the Israeli government approved the expropriation of the land and re-zoned it to a building area. In March 1997, the Israeli government announced it would build 6,500 housing units to accommodate 30,000+ Jewish residents. The first building phase was for 3,500 units, 500 of which were financed by the Israeli government and private investors financed the rest. As a result, more than 60,000 pine trees were uprooted and an entire ecosystem was destroyed. Geopolitical Status of Bethlehem Governorate 1 Lead-up Between the current millennium and the one before it, Bethlehem city has witnessed unprecedented changes to its life, in terms of the ruling periods. It started out early in the 20th century when the city was under the rule of the Ottoman Empire until it went under the British Mandate, the Jordanian rule, the Israeli Occupation to the time when the Palestinian Authority took control on parts of what became known as the Bethlehem Governorate. Table 1 list the ruling periods over Bethlehem. Table 1: Ruling periods over Bethlehem (1516-Present) Years Controlled by 1516-1917 Ottoman Empire 1918-1948 British Mandate 1949-1967 Trans-Jordan and later on the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 1967-1995 The Israeli Occupation The Palestinian Authority assumed partial control, but Israel 1995-to date continued to occupy the majority of the Governorate, (see table 3) Bethlehem 1917 Bethlehem 1970 Geopolitical Status of Bethlehem Governorate 2 Bethlehem 2000 Bethlehem 2006 Geopolitical Status of Bethlehem Governorate 3 The Israeli Segregation Plan in the Occupied Palestinian Territory An Overview In June 2002, the Israeli Government launched its policy of unilateral segregation between Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) by establishing a Segregation Zone along the western terrains of the occupied West Bank.