Volume 1.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volume 1.Pdf Historic Timber-built Seacoast Piers of Eastern England: Technological, Environmental and Social Contexts Volume 1 of 2 Mark Stiles Johnson PhD University of York Archaeology April 2015 Abstract The aim of this thesis is to initially establish the existence of a class of monument, the timber-built seacoast pier, which has heretofore received virtually no investigation by archaeologists and been merely briefly referred to by a handful of historians. Data sources for this topic are diverse and include documentary sources, material remains, cartographic and pictorial evidence, coastal geomorphology and place-names. Investigation is perforce multi-disciplinary. This study will show that such structures were once quite widespread within the study area of eastern England, and indeed further afield. These structures were far from identical and the varying technical forms of the piers are determined and explanations sought to account for these. The physical backdrop to these piers was the varied and dynamic coastal environment of the eastern seaboard of the North Sea and it is not possible to gain a broad understanding of the piers without reference to this environment. Timber-built seacoast piers required enormous resources to construct. They were regularly subject to damage and destruction and they were costly to maintain. Given such circumstances, communities often struggled to maintain their piers. Occasionally, their resources expended, this battle was lost. More often they limped on, saved by appeal to the wider community, county or crown. The lengths to which communities were prepared to go in order to safeguard their piers demonstrates the enormous value attached to them by the communities and bodies to whom they belonged. Piers came to be important items of infrastructure that were essential to the well being of many local economies and in the meshing together of these with wider economies, regional, national and international. Whilst the technology of seacoast piers is of some intrinsic interest, perhaps the greatest potential of this topic lies in the social and economic spheres. 2 Contents (Volume 1) Abstract 2 Contents 3 (Contents, volume 2) 8 List of Figures 9 List of Tables 15 Acknowlegements 16 Author’s Declaration 17 Chapter 1: Introductory 18 1.0 Introduction 18 1.1 Earlier studies of waterfront archaeology 19 1.2 The absence of previous study of timber seacoast piers 22 1.3 The provision of landing places 25 1.4 Definitions and terminology 27 1.5 The legal and regulatory context of ports 29 1.6 Pier related literature review 31 1.7 Research framework: theory 34 1.8 Research questions 38 1.9 Methodology 39 1.10 Glossary of terms 44 3 Chapter 2: Technology 46 2.0 Preamble 46 2.1 Classification of pier forms 46 2.2 The typological groups defined 47 2.3 Piers with walls of close-piling 48 2.3.1 Bridlington: early 16th-century – 1719 48 2.3.2 Sheringham: 1580s – 1590s 52 2.3.3 Great Yarmouth: mid 16th – mid 20th centuries 53 2.3.4 Southwold: early 18th – early 20th centuries 62 2.3.5 Sandwich: a later 16th-century proposal 65 2.3.6 Hastings: mid 16th – mid 17th centuries 67 2.4 Piers with an earth-fast frame 69 2.4.1 Bridlington: 1719 – circa 1815 69 2.4.2 Cromer: 1732 – 1820 76 2.4.3 Southwold: earlier 20th-century 77 2.4.4 Margate: early 16th-century – circa 1810 81 2.4.5 Broadstairs: early 16th-century – present 86 2.4.6 Dover: 1535 – later 19th-century 92 2.4.7 Folkestone: 16th? – early 19th centuries 100 2.4.8 Rye: mid – late 18th-century 103 2.5 Piers with a free-standing frame 104 2.5.1 Filey: 16th? – 17th centuries 104 2.5.2 Flamborough: Early 15th? – early 17th centuries 108 4 2.6 Other known timber-built piers 112 2.6.1 Newbiggin by the Sea: early 14th?– mid 15th? centuries 112 2.6.2 Hartlepool: early 14th? – early 17th? centuries 113 2.6.3 Whitby: 1307 – 17th-century 116 2.6.4 Scarborough 1252? – late 16th-century 117 2.6.5 Hornsea: 15th-century? – late 16th-century 123 2.6.6 Cromer: 1390 – later 17th-century 124 2.6.7 Ramsgate: early 16th-century – late 18th-century 126 2.7 Pier forms discussion 129 2.7.1 The evidence for regional and chronological variation 129 2.7.2 Explaining variation of pier form 132 2.7.3 The question of design 137 2.7.4 Prefabrication 140 2.8 Buildings and piers 141 2.9 Craftsmen, experts and organisation 147 2.10 Timber and its supply 154 2.11 Related structural forms 157 Chapter 3: Environmental Context 160 3.1 The location and provision of medieval and post-medieval ports 160 3.2 The coastal geomorphology of eastern England 165 3.2.1 Zone 1: Newbiggin by the Sea to Flamborough 166 3.2.2 Zone 2: Holderness 175 5 3.2.3 Zone 3: Eastern North Norfolk 180 3.2.4 Zone 4: Norfolk/Suffolk borders 185 3.2.5 Zone 5: Isle of Thanet 201 3.2.6 Zone 6: South-east coast 205 3.3 Discussion 215 3.3.1 Environmental problems: solutions, active and reactive 216 3.3.2 Silting 216 3.3.3 Erosion 219 3.3.4 Storm damage 219 3.3.5 Further environmental consideration 221 Chapter 4: The Social Context 226 4.1 Ownership 226 4.1.1 Estate and manorial ownership 226 4.1.2 Crown ownership 232 4.1.3 Lessee ownership 237 4.1.4 Municipal ownership 242 4.1.5 Commissioner ownership 248 4.1.6 Private ownership 257 4.1. Ownership summary 258 4.2 Control 261 4.3 Funding 272 4.3.1 Recurring ordinary income 275 6 4.3.2 Extra-ordinary income 278 4.4 Summary 291 Chapter 5: The demise of timber-built piers 293 5.1 Balanced technological, environmental and social connections? 293 5.2 The case for timber: for and against 294 5.3 Early forms of stone piers 299 5.4 New administrative and social contexts enabling change 305 Chapter 6: Timber-built seacoast piers: a European context 309 6.1 Known examples 309 6.2 Some conclusions and the scope for broader European study 332 7: Conclusions 334 8: Bibliography 341 7 Contents (Volume 2): Individual case study notes Scope and contents Case study 1: Newbiggin by the Sea Case study 2: Hartlepool Case study 3: Whitby Case study 4: Scarborough Case study 5: Filey Case study 6: Flamborough Case study 7: Bridlington Case study 8: Hornsea Case study 9: Sheringham Case study 10: Cromer Case study 11: Great Yarmouth Case study 12: Southwold Case study 13: Margate Case study 14: Broadstairs Case study 15: Ramsgate Case study 16: Sandwich Case study 17: Dover Case study 18: Folkestone Case study 19: Rye Case study 20: Hastings 8 List of Figures Figure 1 Distribution of timber-built pier sites within the study area 44 Figure 2 The south pier at Bridlington c. 1700 by Francis Place 52 Figure 3 Town and piers of Great Yarmouth c. 1570 58 Figure 4 Detail of Figure 3 (reproduced from Palmer 1854) 58 Figure 5 Section: Great Yarmouth north pier by John Coode,1902 60 Figure 6 Plan of Great Yarmouth north pier by John Coode, 1885 61 Figure 7 Photograph, Great Yarmouth north pier, earlier 20th-century 62 Figure 8 Extract of 1830 plan of Southwold harbour by T.W. Ellis 63 Figure 9 Engraving of Southwold piers, 1822 64 Figure 10 Map of 1548, Roger’s proposed cut to Sandwich with pier/s 65 Figure 11 Photograph of c1870, showing timber pier remains at Hastings 69 Figure 12 Bridlington harbour mouth with the new timber piers of 1719 70 Figure 13 View of Bridlington south pier 70 Figure 14 Simon Goodrick’s plan of Bridlington piers, 1814 72 Figure 15 Inner face of Bridlington north pier in the early 19th-century 73 Figure 16 Exterior of Bridlington north pier 74 Figure 17 Breakwater adjacent to Bridlington north pier 74 Figure 18 Reconstruction of a typical bay unit, post1719 piers, Bridlington 75 Figure 19 The pier at Cromer circa 1813-1821 77 Figure 20 Southwold, section drawing of 1902 North Pier rebuilding 78 Figure 21 Southwold, plan of 1902 North Pier rebuilding 79 9 Figure 22 Photograph of rebuilding of Southwold North Pier, e. 20th-century 79 Figure 23 Photograph of extant timber-built pier remains, Southwold 80 Figure 24 Photograph detail of extant pier remains, Southwold 81 Figure 25 View of the pier and part of the town of Margate, J. Lewis, 1736 83 Figure 26 The ‘defended’ shoreline west of the pier, Margate 1790 84 Figure 27 Margate. Boy’s map of 1811 showing outline of smaller stone- clad timber pier and new larger stone pier beyond 85 Figure 28 Mid 19th-century view of part of the outer face of Broadstairs pier 86 Figure 29 Mid 19th-century view of part of the head of Broadstairs pier 87 Figure 30 Broadstairs. Pier frame exposed by storm damage, 1897 89 Figure 31 Ordnance Survey map of Broadstairs pier, 1870s 90 Figure 32 Ordnance Survey map of Broadstairs pier, 2010 90 Figure 33 Broadstairs. Photograph detail of elevated walling 91 Figure 34 Broadstairs. Photograph of timber to inner wall of pier 92 Figure 35 Modern plan of the Henrician pier works at Dover 1541-51 93 Figure 36 Dover harbour c.1540 95 Figure 37 Extract from Anton Wyngaerde’s ‘Dover from the Sea’ c. 1540 95 Figure 38 Detail of the piers of Dover harbour in 1595 96 Figure 39 Plan of Dover Harbour in 1661 97 Figure 40 View of the head of the south pier, Dover, early 19th-century 98 Figure 41 View of the pier heads at the entrance to Dover Harbour in 1851 99 Figure 42 Pier heads at Dover harbour in the 2nd half of the 19th-century 99 Figure 43 Folkestone.
Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture | the AHRC Cultural Value
    Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska 2 Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska THE AHRC CULTURAL VALUE PROJECT CONTENTS Foreword 3 4. The engaged citizen: civic agency 58 & civic engagement Executive summary 6 Preconditions for political engagement 59 Civic space and civic engagement: three case studies 61 Part 1 Introduction Creative challenge: cultural industries, digging 63 and climate change 1. Rethinking the terms of the cultural 12 Culture, conflict and post-conflict: 66 value debate a double-edged sword? The Cultural Value Project 12 Culture and art: a brief intellectual history 14 5. Communities, Regeneration and Space 71 Cultural policy and the many lives of cultural value 16 Place, identity and public art 71 Beyond dichotomies: the view from 19 Urban regeneration 74 Cultural Value Project awards Creative places, creative quarters 77 Prioritising experience and methodological diversity 21 Community arts 81 Coda: arts, culture and rural communities 83 2. Cross-cutting themes 25 Modes of cultural engagement 25 6. Economy: impact, innovation and ecology 86 Arts and culture in an unequal society 29 The economic benefits of what? 87 Digital transformations 34 Ways of counting 89 Wellbeing and capabilities 37 Agglomeration and attractiveness 91 The innovation economy 92 Part 2 Components of Cultural Value Ecologies of culture 95 3. The reflective individual 42 7. Health, ageing and wellbeing 100 Cultural engagement and the self 43 Therapeutic, clinical and environmental 101 Case study: arts, culture and the criminal 47 interventions justice system Community-based arts and health 104 Cultural engagement and the other 49 Longer-term health benefits and subjective 106 Case study: professional and informal carers 51 wellbeing Culture and international influence 54 Ageing and dementia 108 Two cultures? 110 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility Guide.Pdf
    Accessibility Guide We want to make everyone's visit as enjoyable as possible and are committed to providing suitable access for all our guests, whatever their individual needs we 1 endeavour to offer the same high quality service. We aim to accurately describe our facilities and services below to give you as much information as possible before booking your visit. Specific accessibility enquiries please contact the owners direct: Stuart 07713211132 Zoe 07980808096 Email: [email protected] Owners can be contacted 24 hours a day. Getting here St Annes Beach Huts, The Island, South Promenade, Lytham St Annes Annes, Lancashire FY8 1LS By car Take the M6 motorway to junction 32 and follow the M55 signposted Blackpool. At the end of the motorway follow signs to South Shore/Lytham St Annes, proceeding past Blackpool Airport. Follow the seafront road all the way heading to Lytham St Annes. Take the 1st right after St Annes Pier onto the Island Cinema seafront car park by the RNLI shop. This is Pay & Display (except for a few spaces marked with red and blue lines immediately in front of the cinema building) By Taxi You can get a taxi with Whiteside Taxis by calling 01253 711611. The taxi company has a wheelchair accessible vehicle. You can get a taxi with Premier Cabs by calling 01253 711111. The taxi company has a wheelchair accessible vehicle. By train Trains run on a hourly basis from Preston Mainline station to St Annes. There is a taxi rank outside St Annes Station, although, if you prefer to walk, the Beach Huts are just 10 – 15 minutes away.
    [Show full text]
  • Pier Pressure: Best Practice in the Rehabilitation of British Seaside Piers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bournemouth University Research Online Pier pressure: Best practice in the rehabilitation of British seaside piers A. Chapman Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, UK ABSTRACT: Victorian seaside piers are icons of British national identity and a fundamental component of seaside resorts. Nevertheless, these important markers of British heritage are under threat: in the early 20th century nearly 100 piers graced the UK coastline, but almost half have now gone. Piers face an uncertain future: 20% of piers are currently deemed ‘at risk’. Seaside piers are vital to coastal communities in terms of resort identity, heritage, employment, community pride, and tourism. Research into the sustainability of these iconic structures is a matter of urgency. This paper examines best practice in pier regeneration projects that are successful and self-sustaining. The paper draws on four case studies of British seaside piers that have recently undergone, or are currently being, regenerated: Weston Super-Mare Grand pier; Hastings pier; Southport pier; and Penarth pier. This study identifies critical success factors in pier regeneration and examines the socio-economic sustainability of seaside piers. 1 INTRODUCTION This paper focuses on British seaside piers. Seaside pleasure piers are an uniquely British phenomena, being developed from the early 19th century onwards as landing jetties for the holidaymakers arriving at the resorts via paddle steamers. As seaside resorts developed, so too did their piers, transforming by the late 19th century into places for middle-class tourists to promenade, and by the 20th century as hubs of popular entertainment: the pleasure pier.
    [Show full text]
  • Pier Pressure © Rory Walsh
    Viewpoint Pier pressure © Rory Walsh Time: 15 mins Region: East of England Landscape: coastal Location: Southend Pier, Western Esplanade, Southend-on-Sea, Essex SS1 1EE Grid reference: TQ 88486 84941 Keep an eye out for: Wading birds and the masts of a wrecked Second World War ship, the SS Richard Montgomery 1.3 miles, 2.2 kilometres, 2,158 metres, 7,080 feet – however you measure it, Southend’s pleasure pier is the longest in the world. On hot days walking to the end can feel like making a pilgrimage to the sun. No wonder most of the pier’s 200,000 annual visitors hop aboard one of the special trains. From this proud symbol of Britain’s seaside you can enjoy sweeping views across the Essex Estuary, sample various amusements and send a postcard from the pier’s own letterbox. Why does Southend have the world’s longest pleasure pier? To begin let’s think about where we are. Southend Pier is in Southend-on-Sea. The ‘on-Sea’ part is an important reminder of why piers were built. Today most of us enjoy them from dry land but they were originally for travelling on water. Piers developed for docking boats. Landing at Southend is difficult though. If you are here at low tide, look for small boats stranded on sheets of mud. The water retreats a mile from the seafront. Even at high tide the sea is never deeper than six metres, so large boats can’t dock near the beach. If landing here was so much trouble, why go through the time and expense of building a huge pier? It’s no coincidence that many of Britain’s seaside piers date from the early 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Our Pier': Leisure Activities and Local Communities at the British Seaside
    1 2 3 ‘Our Pier’: Leisure activities and local communities at the British 4 5 seaside 6 7 8 Lavinia Brydona*, Olu Jenzenb & Nicholas Nourse c 9 10 11 aSchool of Arts, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK; bSchool of Media, University of 12 13 Brighton, Brighton, UK; cDepartment of Historical Studies, University of Bristol, 14 15 Bristol, UK 16 17 *corresponding author. Email: [email protected] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 1 1 2 3 4 5 The seaside resort has long held a distinctive position within the history of British 6 leisure. Its peculiar physicality whereby the natural landscape of sea and sand combines 7 8 with distinctive architectural elements, such as pavilions and piers, has accommodated 9 10 many and varied leisure activities across the years. However, to date, the majority of 11 research on British coastal resorts considers these activities solely in connection with 12 13 tourism. Using a combination of contextual archival research, participant observations, 14 semi-structured interviews and oral history narratives, this article attempts a deliberate 15 16 shift in focus where the leisure activities of a young local population are brought to the 17 fore in the history of British seaside entertainment and, in particular, their experiences 18 19 of pleasure piers in the post-war era. The article also explores the potential for the 20 21 concept of the ‘community pier’ in terms of nurturing seaside leisure cultures in the 22 present and future.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasury Committee: Formal Minutes 2017–19
    Treasury Committee: Formal Minutes 2017–19 Thursday 14 September 2017 Members present: Nicky Morgan, in the Chair1 Charlie Elphicke John Mann Stephen Hammond Alison McGovern Mr Alister Jack Catherine McKinnell Kit Malthouse 1. Declaration of interests Members declared their interests, in accordance with the Resolution of the House of 13 July 1992 (for details of declarations of interests, see Appendix I). 2. Committee’s working methods Ordered, That the public be admitted during the examination of witnesses unless the Committee orders otherwise. Resolved, That witnesses who submit written evidence to the Committee are authorised to publish it on their own account in accordance with Standing Order No. 135, subject always to the discretion of the Chair or where the Committee orders otherwise. Resolved, That the Committee shall not consider individual cases. 3. Sub-Committee Ordered, That a Sub-Committee be appointed to consider HM Revenue and Customs and other associated bodies of HM Treasury. Ordered, That all the members of the Committee be members of the Sub-Committee. Ordered, That John Mann be Chair of the Sub-Committee. Ordered, That the Chair have leave to report from time to time evidence taken before the Sub- Committee. 4. Future Programme The Committee considered this matter. Resolved, That the Committee inquire into the HMRC Annual Report and Accounts. 1 Resolved, That the Committee inquire into EU Insurance Regulation. 5. Correspondence Ordered, That the following correspondence be reported to the House for publication on the
    [Show full text]
  • Fleetwood Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan
    Fleetwood Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Fleetwood Conservation Area Appraisal Fleetwood Conservation Area Appraisal Wyre Borough Council Adopted 19th May 2008 Prepared by Paul Butler Associates 31 Blackfriars Road Salford M3 7AQ Wyre Borough Council Copyright Notice All maps and plans in this study report are reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Wyre Borough Council Licence 100018720, 2008. Fleetwood Conservation Area Appraisal Table of contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Conservation Areas 1 1.2 Purpose and Objectives of a Conservation Area Appraisal 1 1.3 Fleetwood Conservation Area 4 2 Fleetwood Masterplan Context ......................................................................... 9 3 Community Involvement ................................................................................. 11 3.1 Consultation Comments 11 4 Historical Development ................................................................................... 15 4.1 The New Town of Fleetwood 15 4.2 Burton’s Geometric Plan 17 4.3 The Growth of Fleetwood 18 5 Character Area 1: The Mount ......................................................................... 22 5.1 Summary Definition of Special Interest 22 5.2 Location and Setting 22 5.3 Key Views and Vistas
    [Show full text]
  • College Notes 1970S
    Team : R. P. Glancy (capt.), A. Leake, WORDSWO RTH SOCIETY J. Catford, M. Agass, D. M. Brookes, N. Next year is the bicentenary of Wordsworth's College Notes Smith, D. Thackeray. birth, and though it is not the purpose of the Appointments and AUJards W ordsworth Society to propagandise W ords­ appointed Lecturer in Classics worth, since propaganda would be anti­ Mr M. T. \'XI. ARNHEIM (Ph.D. 1969) has been pathetic to the nature of his work it was in the University of Natal, South Africa. invited by the College to sugo-est ays of been appointed Chichele Professor TABLE TE NIS CLUB � Mr G. BARRACLOUGH (Fellow 1962) has celebrating this event. Apart fr m the fo rmal � of Modern History at Oxford. Early in the term a meeting was held fo r those recognition of his birth it was generally felt formerly Master of the Rev. J. S. Boys SMITH (B.A. 1922), Fellow and interested in playing Table Tennis on an that as a more lasting gesture a fitting one The elected into an Honorary Fellowship at Darwin College. inter-college level. The response from fresh­ would be a fu nd to help young Cambridge College, has been 1956) has been appointed Group Research and Develop­ men was good but only two of the previous poets to publish their work. Mr T. FAwCETT (B.A. & Son, Ltd. yea 's team members came along. It was This term's activities have been limited but ment Officer by Messrs J. Gliksten � appointed Professor and Dean of the deCIded to enter six teams in the e.
    [Show full text]
  • Sculptural Serenity: an Open Air Extravaganza on Blackpool’S Promenade Introduction
    SCULPTURAL SERENITY: AN OPEN AIR EXTRAVAGANZA ON BLACKPOOL’S PROMENADE INTRODUCTION When the opportunity to travel comes back into our lives in 2021, outdoor space, and the chance to explore new facets within it, are likely to be highly valued. The so-called ‘staycation’ is predicted to be the number one holiday trend this year and we may, for some time, need to do our own thing, keeping our distance from others, to keep everyone safe. If there is one thing Blackpool – and the rest of our Fylde coastline – has in abundance, it is open space. We are all said to have fallen in love with nature during lockdowns and our fabulous seafront offers every opportunity to explore its call, whether you listen to crashing waves, watch the sand change colour as the tide recedes, or pay attention to the cries of the herring gulls overhead. We reflect the colours of Blackpool within our luxury self- catering holiday apartments, using the ‘Left Coast Colour Palette’ within each one’s individual branding and interior. What we really want to do, of course, is get our visitors outdoors, exploring these for themselves and discovering new facets to Blackpool and its surrounding towns and villages. To help you do that whenever you can, whilst (for now) giving you something new to learn about Blackpool, we have put together our little guide to some stunning things, remarkable, unusual and poignant, which you can see, when you step outside our door. If you want to walk with added purpose, get carried away with your camera whilst trying to take artistic shots, or cycle and take in sea air, this guide will provide something for you to look out for, ponder, debate and discuss with the dog, perhaps, if he or she is also staying with us! We hope it will bring you some added pleasure, at a time when the outdoors and open spaces will have to continue to be our sanctuary.
    [Show full text]
  • How Good a Historian Was Francis Blomefield
    Aberystwyth University 'Francis Blomefield as a historian of Norwich Stoker, David Published in: Norfolk Archaeology Publication date: 2005 Citation for published version (APA): Stoker, D. (2005). 'Francis Blomefield as a historian of Norwich. Norfolk Archaeology, 54, 387-405. Document License Unclear General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Aberystwyth Research Portal (the Institutional Repository) are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Aberystwyth Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Aberystwyth Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. tel: +44 1970 62 2400 email: [email protected] Download date: 24. Sep. 2021 Francis Blomefield as a historian of Norwich David Stoker, M.Phil, Ph.D. This is the second of two papers seeking to examine the credentials of Francis Blomefield as the historian of the county of Norfolk. The first article sought to identify Blomefield’s contribution to the published history and analysed his approach to dealing with the rural areas and market towns of the county. This article will look at Blomefield’s approach to the history of Norwich, and answer the question as to whether Blomefield was a historian, an antiquary or a topographer.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleetwood Seafront Masterplan - a Delivery Framework Produced with Support From: Wyre Borough Council
    This document has been Fleetwood Seafront Masterplan - A Delivery Framework produced with support from: Wyre Borough Council June 2009 Regeneration simon fenton partnership Peter B Hunter GH Architect and Development Consultant 71 Charlecote Road Poynton, Stockport Cheshire SK12 1DJ T 01625 411517 Gordon Hood M 07515 397213 Regeneration Consultant E [email protected] Contents 1. Executive Summary ������������������������������������������������������������� 04 4. The Seafront Vision............................................................... 24 4.1 Introduction �������������������������������������������������������������������������� 24 2. Introduction �������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 08 4.2 Fleetwood Seafront Vision ������������������������������������������������ 28 3. Context ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10 5. Zoning of the Seafront �������������������������������������������������������� 30 3.1 Introduction �������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10 Zone 1: Wyre Wing Picnic Area ����������������������������������������������� 32 3.1.1 Background ������������������������������������������������������������������ 10 Zone 2: Model Boating Lake ���������������������������������������������������� 33 3.1.2 Fleetwood Masterplan ��������������������������������������������������� 12 Zone 3: Marine Lake ������������������������������������������������������������������ 34 3.1.3 Expanding
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Pop(-Up)Ular Culture at the Seaside: the British Pleasure Pier As
    Pop(-up)ular Culture at the Seaside: The British Pleasure Pier as Screening Space Introduction This chapter explores a set of enquiries situated at the intersections of cinema-as-event, community cinema and the current cultural development of ‘re-purposing’ seaside piers as community spaces. Drawing on empirical explorations of pop-up cinema on seaside piers, it seeks to historicise the relationship between cinematic viewing practices and Victorian seaside piers, as well as to investigate the role of outdoor cinema in the changing landscape of contemporary seaside resort entertainment. The case studies presented here also illustrate the potential of outdoor deck top cinema as an immersive cinema experience when the seascape and the sounds of the natural surroundings blend with the film’s mise-en-scène. In their earliest incarnation piers were practical structures, serving as landing stages for goods and holidaymakers arriving to seaside resorts via boat. While this functionality remained important throughout the nineteenth century, at least until an expanded rail network offered an alterative means of accessing coastal locations, their pleasurable aspects soon became apparent. This led them to evolve in many different directions over the years, with well-documented fluctuating fortunes (see, for example, Fischer and Walton 1987; Gray 2006; Shaw and Williams eds 1997). Today only fifty nine of the original hundred or so British seaside piers remain, and many of those are under threat. Despite this downturn piers remain important to the coastal communities in which they are situated – in terms of serving as a landmark that gives the town a sense of identity (no two piers are the same), in terms of the local economy and in terms of community heritage – aspects which, we argue, are made manifest in their use as twenty-first century screening spaces.
    [Show full text]