Hastings Law Journal Volume 36 | Issue 6 Article 3 1-1985 Rajneeshpuram: Religion Incorporated Janice L. Sperow Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Janice L. Sperow, Rajneeshpuram: Religion Incorporated, 36 Hastings L.J. 917 (1985). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol36/iss6/3 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Notes Rajneeshpuram: Religion Incorporated The first amendment of the United States Constitution states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ... ."I These two clauses, known as the establishment clause and the free exercise clause respectively, es- tablish the constitutional mandate of government "neutrality" toward religion. 2 Government 3 must steer "a neutral course between the two Religious Clauses, both of which are cast in absolute terms, and either of which, if expanded to a logical extreme, would tend to clash with the other."'4 Yet, while neutrality is the central principle of both clauses, there is no single standard for determining what is a religiously neutral act.5 Instead, the neutrality, and hence permissibility, of a governmental 1. U.S. CONST. amend. I. 2. See generally P. KURLAND, RELIGION AND THE LAW (1962); J. NOWAK, R. Ro- TUNDA & J. YOUNG, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1029 (2d ed. 1983) [hereinafter cited as J.