Control of Ultracold Atoms Trapped in an Optical Lattice by Jieqiu Shao

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Control of Ultracold Atoms Trapped in an Optical Lattice by Jieqiu Shao Control of Ultracold Atoms Trapped in an Optical Lattice by Jieqiu Shao B.S., University of Iowa, 2020 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Science Department of Mechanical Engineering 2020 Committee Members: Marco Nicotra Shalom Ruben Kaushik Jayaram ii Shao, Jieqiu (M.S., Mechanical Engineering) Control of Ultracold Atoms Trapped in an Optical Lattice Thesis directed by Assistant Professor Marco M. Nicotra This thesis is a first step towards the integration of quantum physics and control engineering. The goal of the work is to model and control ultracold atoms trapped in an optical lattice. First, after introducing the fundamental concept of quantum mechanics, we model the quantum system and use Bloch basis decomposition to obtain an ordinary differential equation. We then discuss the geometric properties of the system and show that the system is fully controllable. After that, we design and apply two different control strategies to the system, the Lyapunov control method and optimal control method. Finally, we discuss the simulation results from different control methods and detail the next step of this work. iii Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics . 2 1.2 Modeling of Trapped Ultracold Atoms . 3 1.2.1 Potential Energy Operator . 3 1.2.2 Bloch Basis Decomposition . 4 1.3 Stationary Solutions . 5 2 Geometric Properties 9 2.1 General Concepts . 9 2.2 Geometric Properties of Quantum Systems . 12 2.3 Controllability . 12 3 Control Design 16 3.1 Lyapunov Function . 17 3.1.1 Bilinear Case . 18 3.1.2 Nonlinear Case . 22 3.2 Optimal Control . 24 3.3 Shooting Method . 26 3.4 Newton Step Method . 26 3.4.1 Finite Element Method . 28 3.4.2 Continuation Method . 29 3.4.3 Simulation Results . 29 iv 4 Conclusions 33 Bibliography 34 v List of Figures 1.1 Optical lattice, the blue ball represents the ultracold atom and the red wave represents the laser beam; the lattice wave number is kL = 2π/λL for a lattice wavelength λL; The lattice depth is V0; φ(t) is a time varying phase. 3 1.2 Eigenstates of the Bloch Hamiltonian; this figure shows the eigenstates asso- ciated to the four lowest eigenvalues λ1, λ2, λ3, λ4: ............... 7 2 3 2 2 2 2.1 Top Left: the unit sphere S = f(x1; x2; x3) 2 R jx1 + x2 + x3 = 1g is a 2 manifold; Top Right: the tangent space TxS is a plane that contains x and @F is normal to the vector @x = [2x1 2x2 2x3]; Bottom Left: the two vector T T fields f(x) = [−x2 x1 0] and g(x) = [−x3 0 x1] belong to the tangent space; Bottom Right: the systemx _ = f(x) + ug(x) is controllable. Given u = 0, 2 x_ = f(x) spans the entirety of the level-set fx 2 S j x3 = cg. Given u 6= 0, g(x) allows the system to move from one level-set to another. 15 3.1 Left: the control input u vs time using Lyapunov control law on the bilinear model, given K = 0:2; Right: the population vs time using Lyapunov control law on the bilinear model, given K = 0:2. 20 3.2 Left: the control input u vs time using Lyapunov control law on the bilinear model, given K = 0:5; Right: the population vs time using Lyapunov control law on the bilinear model, given K = 0:5. 20 vi 3.3 Left: the control input u vs time using Lyapunov control law on the bilinear model, given K = 1; Right: the population vs time using Lyapunov control law on the bilinear model, given K = 1. 21 3.4 Left: the control input u vs time using Lyapunov control law on the bilinear model, given K = 2; Right: the population vs time using Lyapunov control law on the bilinear model, given K = 2. 21 _ _ ∗ dV 3.5 V vs u, given α = −1 and β = −0:1; u is the solution to du = 0 that minimizes V_ ; the green region is the control law u = sin−1(K sin u?), where K 2 (0; 1]...................................... 22 3.6 Left: the control input u vs time using Lyapunov control law on the nonlinear model, given K = 1; Right: the population vs time using Lyapunov control law on the nonlinear model, given K = 1. 23 3.7 Left: the control input u vs time using Lyapunov control law on the nonlinear model, given K = 0:1; Right: the population vs time using Lyapunov control law on the nonlinear model, given K = 0:1. 23 3.8 Left: the control input u vs time using optimal control law (Newton method) on the bilinear model; Right: the population vs time using using optimal control law (Newton method) on the bilinear model. 30 3.9 Left: the control input u vs time using optimal control law (Newton method) on the nonlinear model; Right: the population vs time using using optimal control law (Newton method) on the nonlinear model. 30 3.10 The optimal control input u vs time obtained from bilinear and nonlinear model. 31 3.11 Left: the population vs time using optimal control input from bilinear model applied to nonlinear model; Right: the population vs time using using opti- mal control law (Newton method) on nonlinear model. 32 1 Chapter 1 Introduction This thesis investigates the control of ultracold atoms trapped in optical lattice. Ultra- cold atoms are atoms that are maintained at temperatures close to 0 Kelvin (absolute zero). Ultracold atoms offer remarkable opportunities for investigating quantum problems that are relevant to fields as diverse as condensed matter physics, statistical physics, quantum chem- istry, and high-energy physics [1]. The high degree of controllability and new observation tools, which enable the detection of each individual atom, make ultracold atoms ideal as analog quantum simulators [2, 3, 4, 5] high-accuracy measurements such as quantum clocks [6] and interferometers [7]. The optical lattices used in the experiments are typically formed by interfering several laser beams in order to realize a fully controllable periodic light struc- ture meant to mimic the crystal lattice of a solid. Quantum technology is currently at the tipping point and is aiming to transition from experimental physics laboratories to real-world engineering applications. This transition requires a strong degree of collaboration between quantum physicists and specialists from other disciplines, such as control engineering. This thesis brings together quantum mechanics and control engineering. I am a mechanical engi- neering student with little previous knowledge in quantum theory, and my role is to adapt classic tools from systems and control theory to the new and exciting setting of quantum systems. Before we delve deeper into the specifics of our system, we provide a brief overview of quantum mechanics. The objective is to provide just enough background information to 2 enable someone with a traditional engineering background to gain insight into the intricacies of quantum theory. 1.1 Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Quantum mechanics describes the physical properties of small objects (atomic scale) that are well isolated from other objects. The purpose of this section is to introduce the fundamental concept of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics follows from four primary postulates: Wave Function: The state of a quantum system is fully described by a wave function Ψ(x; t), which is a complex valued function of two real variables, where x is position and t is time. The modulus square of the wave function, jΨ(x; t)j2, is the probability density, which represents the probability of finding the atom in a given position at a given time. If there are many atoms, then the wave function represents the density of atoms at given position and time. Observables: An observable is a physical quantity that can be measured and is captured by a Hermitian operator applied to the wave function Ψ(x; t). For example, the kinetic energy of a particle is K^ (x)Ψ(x; t), where 2 K^ (x) = − ~ r2 (1.1) 2m x is the kinetic energy operator, m is the mass of particle and ~ is the reduced Planck constant. Measurements: For a given observable A, the only possible result of the measurement is one of the eigenvalues ai of the operator, where ai is associated to an eigenvector νi satis- fying A(x)νi(x) = aiνi(x). This means that the more closely the wave function matches an eigenvector of the observable νi, the more likely the measurement is to reveal the associated eigenvalue. This property is fundamentally different from classical mechanics, where a mea- surement can yield a continuum of results. Indeed, the whole premise of quantum mechanics is that measurements are \quantized" and any measurement can only yield a discrete set of values. 3 Schr¨odingerequation: The dynamics of the wave function is described by the Schr¨odinger equation i~Ψ(_ x; t) = H^ (x)Ψ(x; t); (1.2) where H^ (x) = K^ (x) + U^(x) is the Hamiltonian, K^ (x) is the kinetic energy operator and U^(x) is the potential energy operator. This can be paralleled with classical mechanics where the total energy of the system is equal to the sum of kinetic and potential energy. 1.2 Modeling of Trapped Ultracold Atoms 1.2.1 Potential Energy Operator For our optical lattice, the laser beam defines the potential energy of the wave function referring to Figure 1.1, it is possible to define the potential energy operator as V U^(x) = − 0 cos(2k x + φ(t)); (1.3) 2 L where V0 is the depth of the lattice, λL is the wavelength, kL = 2π/λL is the wave number, and φ(t) is the phase.
Recommended publications
  • Dynamical Control of Matter Waves in Optical Lattices Sune Schøtt
    Aarhus University Faculty of Science Department of Physics and Astronomy PhD Thesis Dynamical Control of Matter Waves in Optical Lattices by Sune Schøtt Mai November 2010 This thesis has been submitted to the Faculty of Science at Aarhus Uni- versity in order to fulfill the requirements for obtaining a PhD degree in physics. The work has been carried out under the supervision of profes- sor Klaus Mølmer and associate professor Jan Arlt at the Department of Physics and Astronomy. Contents Contents i 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Thesis Outline .......................... 3 1.2 Bose-Einstein Condensation .................. 4 2 Experimental Setup and Methods 9 2.1 Overview ............................. 9 2.2 Magneto-Optic Trap and Optical Pumping .......... 9 2.3 Transport with Movable Quadrupole Traps . 13 2.4 Evaporative Cooling ...................... 14 2.5 Absorption Imaging ....................... 15 3 Optical Lattices 17 3.1 Introduction ........................... 17 3.2 AC Stark-shift Induced Potentials . 18 3.2.1 Classical and Semi-Classical Approaches . 18 3.2.2 Dressed State Picture . 20 3.3 Lattice Band Structure ..................... 22 3.3.1 Reciprocal Space Bloch Theorem . 23 3.3.2 The 1D Lattice Band-Structure . 23 4 Lattice Calibration Techniques 27 4.1 Introduction ........................... 27 4.2 Kapitza-Dirac Scattering .................... 28 4.3 Bloch Oscillation and LZ-Tunneling . 30 4.3.1 Bloch Oscillation .................... 31 4.3.2 Landau-Zener Theory . 31 i ii CONTENTS 4.3.3 Experimental Verification of the Landau-Zener Model 32 4.4 Lattice Modulation ....................... 35 4.5 Summary ............................ 35 5 Dynamically Controlled Lattices 39 5.1 Introduction ........................... 39 5.2 Overview ............................. 39 5.3 Controlled Matter Wave Beam Splitter .
    [Show full text]
  • Scalability and High-Efficiency of an $(N+ 1) $-Qubit Toffoli Gate Sphere
    Scalability and high-efficiency of an (n + 1)-qubit Toffoli gate sphere via blockaded Rydberg atoms Dongmin Yu1, Yichun Gao1, Weiping Zhang2,3, Jinming Liu1 and Jing Qian1,3,† 1State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, Department of Physics, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiaotong University and Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai 200240, China and 3Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China∗ The Toffoli gate serving as a basic building block for reversible quantum computation, has man- ifested its great potentials in improving the error-tolerant rate in quantum communication. While current route to the creation of Toffoli gate requires implementing sequential single- and two-qubit gates, limited by longer operation time and lower average fidelity. We develop a new theoretical protocol to construct a universal (n + 1)-qubit Toffoli gate sphere based on the Rydberg blockade mechanism, by constraining the behavior of one central target atom with n surrounding control atoms. Its merit lies in the use of only five π pulses independent of the control atom number n which leads to the overall gate time as fast as 125ns and the average fidelity closing to 0.999. The maximal filling number of control atoms can be∼ up to n = 46, determined by the spherical diame- ter which is equal to the blockade radius, as well as by the nearest neighbor spacing between two trapped-atom lattices. Taking n = 2, 3, 4 as examples we comparably show the gate performance with experimentally accessible parameters, and confirm that the gate errors mainly attribute to the imperfect blockade strength, the spontaneous atomic loss and the imperfect ground-state prepa- ration.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Atoms in Optical Lattices
    Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics Lecture notes for Physics 284 by Eugene Demler Harvard University September 18, 2014 2 Chapter 5 Atoms in optical lattices Optical lattices provide a powerful tool for creating strongly correlated many- body systems of ultracold atoms. By choosing different lattice geometries one can obtain very different single particle dispersions. The ratio of the interaction and kinetic energies can be controlled by tuning the depth of the lattice. 5.1 Noninteracting particles in optical lattices The simplest possible periodic optical potential is formed by overlapping two counter-propagating beams. Electric field in the resulting standing wave is E(z) = E0 sin(kz + θ) cos !t (5.1) Here k = 2π/λ is the wavevector of the laser light. Following the general recipe for AC Stark effects, we calculate electric dipolar moments induced by this field in the atoms, calculate interaction between dipolar moments and the electric field, and average over fast optical oscillations (see chapter ??). The result is the potential 2 V (z) = −V0 sin (kz + θ) (5.2) 2 where V0 = α(!)E0 =2, with α(!) being polarizability. It is common to express 2 2 V0 in units of the recoil energy Er = ~ k =2m. In real experiments one also needs to take into account the transverse profile of the beam. Hence V (r?; z) = exp{−2r2=w2(z)g×V (z). In most experiments the main effect of the transverse profile is only to renormalize the parabolic confining potentia. Combining three perpendicular sets of standing waves we get a simple cubic lattice V (r) = −Vx 0 cosqxx − Vy 0 cosqyy − Vz 0 cosqzz (5.3) 3 4 CHAPTER 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Veselago Lensing with Ultracold Atoms in an Optical Lattice
    ARTICLE Received 9 Dec 2013 | Accepted 27 Jan 2014 | Published 14 Feb 2014 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4327 Veselago lensing with ultracold atoms in an optical lattice Martin Leder1, Christopher Grossert1 & Martin Weitz1 Veselago pointed out that electromagnetic wave theory allows for materials with a negative index of refraction, in which most known optical phenomena would be reversed. A slab of such a material can focus light by negative refraction, an imaging technique strikingly different from conventional positive refractive index optics, where curved surfaces bend the rays to form an image of an object. Here we demonstrate Veselago lensing for matter waves, using ultracold atoms in an optical lattice. A relativistic, that is, photon-like, dispersion relation for rubidium atoms is realized with a bichromatic optical lattice potential. We rely on a Raman p-pulse technique to transfer atoms between two different branches of the dispersion relation, resulting in a focusing that is completely analogous to the effect described by Veselago for light waves. Future prospects of the demonstrated effects include novel sub-de Broglie wavelength imaging applications. 1 Institut fu¨r Angewandte Physik der Universita¨t Bonn, Wegelerstrae 8, 53115 Bonn, Germany. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.W. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 5:3327 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4327 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved. ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4327 eselago lensing is a concept based on negative of spatial periodicity l/4, generated by the dispersion of multi- refraction1–3, where a spatially diverging pencil of rays photon Raman transitions17.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultracold Atoms in a Disordered Optical Lattice
    ULTRACOLD ATOMS IN A DISORDERED OPTICAL LATTICE BY MATTHEW ROBERT WHITE B.S., University of California, Santa Barbara, 2003 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Paul Kwiat, Chair Assistant Professor Brian DeMarco, Director of Research Assistant Professor Raffi Budakian Professor David Ceperley Acknowledgments This work would not have been possible without the support of my advisor Brian DeMarco and coworkers Matt Pasienski, David McKay, Hong Gao, Stanimir Kondov, David Chen, William McGehee, Matt Brinkley, Lauren Aycock, Cecilia Borries, Soheil Baharian, Sarah Gossett, Minsu Kim, and Yutaka Miyagawa. Generous funding was provided by the Uni- versity of Illinois, NSF, ARO, and ONR. ii Table of Contents List of Figures..................................... v Chapter 1 Introduction .............................. 1 1.1 Strongly-interacting Boson Systems.......................1 1.2 Bose-Hubbard Model...............................2 1.3 Disordered Bose-Hubbard Model with Cold Atoms..............3 1.4 Observations...................................4 1.5 Future Work on the DBH Model........................5 1.6 Quantum Simulation...............................5 1.7 Outline......................................6 Chapter 2 BEC Apparatus............................ 8 2.1 Introduction....................................8 2.2 Atomic Properties................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Hubbard Hamiltonians with the Multiconfigurational Time-Dependent Hartree Method for Indistinguishable Particles Axel Lode, Christoph Bruder
    Dynamics of Hubbard Hamiltonians with the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles Axel Lode, Christoph Bruder To cite this version: Axel Lode, Christoph Bruder. Dynamics of Hubbard Hamiltonians with the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles. Physical Review A, American Physical Society 2016, 94, pp.013616. 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.013616. hal-02369999 HAL Id: hal-02369999 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02369999 Submitted on 19 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. PHYSICAL REVIEW A 94, 013616 (2016) Dynamics of Hubbard Hamiltonians with the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles Axel U. J. Lode* and Christoph Bruder Department of Physics, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland (Received 29 April 2016; published 22 July 2016) We apply the multiconfigurational time-dependent Hartree method for indistinguishable particles (MCTDH-X) to systems of bosons or fermions in lattices described by Hubbard-type Hamiltonians with long-range or short-range interparticle interactions. The wave function is expanded in a variationally optimized time-dependent many-body basis generated by a set of effective creation operators that are related to the original particle creation operators by a time-dependent unitary transform.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Classes of Unconventional Photonic Crystals
    Two Classes of Unconventional Photonic Crystals by Y. D. Chong B.S. Physics Stanford University, 2003 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AUGUST 2008 c 2008 Y. D. Chong. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: Department of Physics August 2008 Certified by: Marin Soljaˇci´c Assistant Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Professor Thomas J. Greytak Associate Department Head for Education Abstract This thesis concerns two classes of photonic crystal that differ from the usual solid-state dielectric photonic crystals studied in optical physics. The first class of unconventional photonic crystal consists of atoms bound in an optical lattice. This is a “resonant photonic crystal”, in which an underlying optical resonance modifies the usual band physics. I present a three-dimensional quantum mechanical model of exciton polaritons which describes this system. Amongst other things, the model explains the reason for the resonant enhancement of the photonic bandgap, which turns out to be related to the Purcell effect. An extension of this band theoretical approach is then used to study dark-state polaritons in Λ-type atomic media. The second class of unconventional photonic crystal consists of two di- mensional photonic crystals that break time-reversal symmetry due to a magneto-optic effect. The band theory for such systems involves topological quantities known as “Chern numbers”, which give rise to the phenomenon of disorder-immune one-way edge modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Implementations of Quantum Computing
    Physical implementations of quantum computing Andrew Daley Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Pittsburgh Overview (Review) Introduction • DiVincenzo Criteria • Characterising coherence times Survey of possible qubits and implementations • Neutral atoms • Trapped ions • Colour centres (e.g., NV-centers in diamond) • Electron spins (e.g,. quantum dots) • Superconducting qubits (charge, phase, flux) • NMR • Optical qubits • Topological qubits Back to the DiVincenzo Criteria: Requirements for the implementation of quantum computation 1. A scalable physical system with well characterized qubits 1 | i 0 | i 2. The ability to initialize the state of the qubits to a simple fiducial state, such as |000...⟩ 1 | i 0 | i 3. Long relevant decoherence times, much longer than the gate operation time 4. A “universal” set of quantum gates control target (single qubit rotations + C-Not / C-Phase / .... ) U U 5. A qubit-specific measurement capability D. P. DiVincenzo “The Physical Implementation of Quantum Computation”, Fortschritte der Physik 48, p. 771 (2000) arXiv:quant-ph/0002077 Neutral atoms Advantages: • Production of large quantum registers • Massive parallelism in gate operations • Long coherence times (>20s) Difficulties: • Gates typically slower than other implementations (~ms for collisional gates) (Rydberg gates can be somewhat faster) • Individual addressing (but recently achieved) Quantum Register with neutral atoms in an optical lattice 0 1 | | Requirements: • Long lived storage of qubits • Addressing of individual qubits • Single and two-qubit gate operations • Array of singly occupied sites • Qubits encoded in long-lived internal states (alkali atoms - electronic states, e.g., hyperfine) • Single-qubit via laser/RF field coupling • Entanglement via Rydberg gates or via controlled collisions in a spin-dependent lattice Rb: Group II Atoms 87Sr (I=9/2): Extensively developed, 1 • P1 e.g., optical clocks 3 • Degenerate gases of Yb, Ca,..
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1807.11342V2 [Cond-Mat.Quant-Gas] 4 Aug 2019
    A Dissipatively Stabilized Mott Insulator of Photons Ruichao Ma, Brendan Saxberg, Clai Owens, Nelson Leung, Yao Lu, Jonathan Simon, and David I. Schuster James Franck Institute and Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 (Dated: August 6, 2019) Superconducting circuits are a competitive platform for quantum computation because they offer controllability, long coherence times and strong interactions|properties that are essential for the study of quantum materials comprising microwave photons. However, intrinsic photon losses in these circuits hinder the realization of quantum many-body phases. Here we use superconducting circuits to explore strongly correlated quantum matter by building a Bose-Hubbard lattice for pho- tons in the strongly interacting regime. We develop a versatile method for dissipative preparation of incompressible many-body phases through reservoir engineering and apply it to our system to stabilize a Mott insulator of photons against losses. Site- and time-resolved readout of the lattice allows us to investigate the microscopic details of the thermalization process through the dynamics of defect propagation and removal in the Mott phase. Our experiments demonstrate the power of superconducting circuits for studying strongly correlated matter in both coherent and engineered dissipative settings. In conjunction with recently demonstrated superconducting microwave Chern insulators, we expect that our approach will enable the exploration of topologically ordered phases of matter. The richness of quantum materials originates from and the adiabatic criterion at the smallest many-body the competition between quantum fluctuations arising gaps, which shrink in the quantum critical region and from strong interactions, motional dynamics, and the often vanish at topological phase transitions.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Physics in Space
    Quantum Physics in Space Alessio Belenchiaa,b,∗∗, Matteo Carlessob,c,d,∗∗, Omer¨ Bayraktare,f, Daniele Dequalg, Ivan Derkachh, Giulio Gasbarrii,j, Waldemar Herrk,l, Ying Lia Lim, Markus Rademacherm, Jasminder Sidhun, Daniel KL Oin, Stephan T. Seidelo, Rainer Kaltenbaekp,q, Christoph Marquardte,f, Hendrik Ulbrichtj, Vladyslav C. Usenkoh, Lisa W¨ornerr,s, Andr´eXuerebt, Mauro Paternostrob, Angelo Bassic,d,∗ aInstitut f¨urTheoretische Physik, Eberhard-Karls-Universit¨atT¨ubingen, 72076 T¨ubingen,Germany bCentre for Theoretical Atomic,Molecular, and Optical Physics, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN, United Kingdom cDepartment of Physics,University of Trieste, Strada Costiera 11, 34151 Trieste,Italy dIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Trieste Section, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste, Italy eMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Staudtstraße 2, 91058 Erlangen, Germany fInstitute of Optics, Information and Photonics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-N¨urnberg, Staudtstraße 7 B2, 91058 Erlangen, Germany gScientific Research Unit, Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, Matera, Italy hDepartment of Optics, Palacky University, 17. listopadu 50,772 07 Olomouc,Czech Republic iF´ısica Te`orica: Informaci´oi Fen`omensQu`antics,Department de F´ısica, Universitat Aut`onomade Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain jDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom kDeutsches Zentrum f¨urLuft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR), Institut f¨urSatellitengeod¨asieund
    [Show full text]
  • Realization of a Quantum Integer-Spin Chain with Controllable Interactions
    PHYSICAL REVIEW X 5, 021026 (2015) Realization of a Quantum Integer-Spin Chain with Controllable Interactions C. Senko,1 P. Richerme,1 J. Smith,1 A. Lee,1 I. Cohen,2 A. Retzker,2 and C. Monroe1 1Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland Department of Physics and National Institute of Standards and Technology, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA 2Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Givat Ram, Israel (Received 6 October 2014; revised manuscript received 16 March 2015; published 17 June 2015) The physics of interacting integer-spin chains has been a topic of intense theoretical interest, particularly in the context of symmetry-protected topological phases. However, there has not been a controllable model system to study this physics experimentally. We demonstrate how spin-dependent forces on trapped ions can be used to engineer an effective system of interacting spin-1 particles. Our system evolves coherently under an applied spin-1 XY Hamiltonian with tunable, long-range couplings, and all three quantum levels at each site participate in the dynamics. We observe the time evolution of the system and verify its coherence by entangling a pair of effective three-level particles (“qutrits”) with 86% fidelity. By adiabatically ramping a global field, we produce ground states of the XY model, and we demonstrate an instance where the ground state cannot be created without breaking the same symmetries that protect the topological Haldane phase. This experimental platform enables future studies of symmetry-protected order in spin-1 systems and their use in quantum applications. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021026 Subject Areas: Atomic and Molecular Physics, Condensed Matter Physics, Quantum Physics I.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrared-Dressed Entanglement of Cold Open-Shell Polar Molecules for Universal Matchgate Quantum Computing
    Infrared-dressed entanglement of cold open-shell polar molecules for universal matchgate quantum computing Felipe Herrera Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Yudong Cao Department of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA Sabre Kais Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA Qatar Environment and Energy Research Institute, Doha, Qatar K. Birgitta Whaley Berkeley Quantum Information and Computation Center and Department of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94703, USA Abstract. Implementing a scalable quantum information processor using polar molecules in optical lattices requires precise control over the long-range dipole-dipole interaction between molecules in selected lattice sites. We present here a scheme using trapped open-shell 2Σ polar molecules that allows dipolar exchange processes between nearest and next-nearest neighbors to be controlled to construct a generalized transverse Ising spin Hamiltonian with tunable XX, YY and XY couplings in the rotating frame of the driving lasers. The scheme requires a moderately strong bias magnetic field with near-infrared light to provide local tuning of the qubit energy gap, and mid-infrared pulses to perform rotational state transfer via stimulated Raman adiabatic passage. No interaction between qubits is present in the absence of the infrared driving. We analyze the fidelity of the resulting two-qubit matchgate, and demonstrate its robustness as a function of the driving parameters. We discuss a realistic application of the system for universal matchgate quantum computing in optical lattices. Infrared-dressed entanglement of cold open-shell polar molecules for universal matchgate quantum computing 2 1.
    [Show full text]