DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1704.03735V5 [Quant-Ph] 18 Jan 2018 Blurring of the Crystalline Structure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1704.03735V5 [Quant-Ph] 18 Jan 2018 Blurring of the Crystalline Structure Time crystals: a review Krzysztof Sacha and Jakub Zakrzewski1 1Instytut Fizyki imienia Mariana Smoluchowskiego and Mark Kac Complex Systems Research Center, Uniwersytet Jagielloński ulica Profesora Stanisława Łojasiewicza 11 PL-30-348 Kraków Poland (Dated: January 19, 2018) Time crystals are time-periodic self-organized structures postulated by Frank Wilczek in 2012. While the original concept was strongly criticized, it stimulated at the same time an intensive research leading to propositions and experimental verifications of discrete (or Floquet) time crystals – the structures that appear in the time domain due to spontaneous breaking of discrete time translation symmetry. The struggle to observe discrete time crystals is reviewed here together with propositions that generalize this concept introducing condensed matter like physics in the time domain. We shall also revisit the original Wilczek’s idea and review strategies aimed at spontaneous breaking of continuous time translation symmetry. PACS numbers: 11.30.Qc, 67.80.-s, 73.23.-b, 03.75.Lm, 67.85.Hj, 67.85.Jk CONTENTS properties. Crystals are formed due to mutual interac- tions between atoms that self-organize and build regular I. Introduction1 structures in space. This kind of self-organization is a quantum mechanical phenomenon and is related to spon- II. Time crystals: original idea and perspectives2 A. Origin of space crystals: spontaneous breaking of space taneous space translation symmetry breaking (Strocchi, translation symmetry2 2005). It is often neglected that a probability density B. Origin of time crystals: spontaneous breaking of for measurement of a position of a single particle in a continuous time translation symmetry3 system of mutually interacting particles cannot reveal a C. Excited states as a resource?6 crystalline structure unless continuous space translation III. Spontaneous breaking of discrete time translation symmetry is broken. Quantum mechanics tells us that symmetry: idea and experiments7 the center of mass of interacting atoms behaves like a A. Discrete time crystal for atoms bouncing on an free massive particle and in the ground state it must be oscillating mirror8 B. Discrete time crystals in spin systems 11 totally delocalized. The translationally invariant Hamil- C. Experiments 14 tonian leads to quantum eigenstates that are also tran- D. Effect of disorder 16 sitionally invariant. To observe a crystalline structure in the single particle probability density, this translational IV. Condensed matter physics in time crystals 17 symmetry must be broken – in other words we do not A. Space periodic systems versus periodically driven systems 17 know where a crystal is unless we perform a measure- B. Anderson localization in the time domain 19 ment or a system is perturbed by an infinitesimally weak 1. Anderson localization in time crystals 20 external perturbation. Let us repeat, this process occurs 2. Anderson localization in time without crystalline spontaneously and in the real world one deals with the structures 21 symmetry broken state already. After the symmetry is C. Mott insulator in the time domain 22 D. Many-body localization with temporal disorder 23 broken the quantum effects do not give up. However, E. Time crystals with properties of multi-dimensional they are extremely slow and even if a space crystal were systems 23 isolated it would take thousand of years to see quantum arXiv:1704.03735v5 [quant-ph] 18 Jan 2018 blurring of the crystalline structure. It should be noted V. Conclusions 23 that if one was able to measure relative distances be- Acknowledgments 24 tween particles (not particles positions themselves) in a solid state system prepared in the ground state, signa- References 24 tures of regular arrangement of atoms would be observed and such a measurement would not break the continuous space translational symmetry. I. INTRODUCTION Spontaneous symmetry breaking is a general property Crystals are everywhere ranging from jewelery to salt of Nature that surrounds us and it is responsible for in the kitchen. They are built of atoms in a regular a wide class of phenomena like magnetization of ferro- arrangement in space and they have distinct mechan- magnetic materials (rotational symmetry breaking) or ical properties as well as heat or electric conductance Higgs mechanism (breaking of gauge symmetries) (Stroc- 2 chi, 2005). It is related to a situation where equations switch to the consideration of possibility of spontaneous describing a system possess a symmetry but a system time translation symmetry breaking and the idea of time chooses spontaneously a solution that breaks this sym- crystal. We will report on the on-going research in time- metry. The effect can be identified with a vulnerability of independent systems and in systems that are periodically exact symmetric eigenstates to any infinitesimally weak driven and are able to reveal discrete time crystal phe- perturbation. nomena. Next, the research on a possible realization of In 2012 Frank Wilczek proposed an idea of time crys- condensed matter phenomena in the time domain will be tals (Wilczek, 2012). He posed a question whether there described. exist systems which break spontaneously time transla- tion symmetry. In other words if it is possible that a many-body system self-organizes in time and starts II. TIME CRYSTALS: ORIGINAL IDEA AND spontaneously to undergo a periodic motion. This kind PERSPECTIVES of self-organization is a quantum effect and should not We introduce here a concept of time crystals which is be mixed with classical self-organization processes that related to spontaneous breaking of time translation sym- occur in many systems in nature ranging from flash- metry in analogy to spontaneous space translation sym- ing Asian fireflies to synchronized clapping of an audi- metry breaking in the formation of space crystals. We ence that expresses appreciation for an impressive per- begin with the description of space crystals that allows formance (Glass and Mackey, 1988; Neda Z. et al., 2000). us to explain phenomena that can also be observed in the Wilczek considered a time-independent system and sug- time domain when a many-body system switches spon- gested that it can spontaneously turn to periodic mo- taneously to periodic motion realizing the time crystal. tion even in the lowest energy state. It is already known that the original Wilczek idea cannot be realized (Bruno, 2013c; Watanabe and Oshikawa, 2015). However, it be- A. Origin of space crystals: spontaneous breaking of space came an inspiration to other physicists and a novel re- translation symmetry search field has been opened. Exploration of this time territory started immedi- Formation of space crystals relies on periodic self- ately and soon a new version of time crystals was pro- organization of atoms due to their mutual interactions. posed, that is, a discrete or Floquet time crystals (Sacha, Under certain conditions atoms arrange themselves in a 2015b). That time crystals are related to quantum self- periodic lattice that manifests itself in a periodic behav- organization of motion of a many-body system that is pe- ior in space of a probability density for a measurement of riodically driven by an external force. Soon other propo- a single particle (an electron or an ion). Strictly speaking sitions of Floquet time crystals emerged in driven spin such a state cannot be the ground state of a many-body systems (Else et al., 2016; Khemani et al., 2016). While atomic system because it breaks the translation symme- one would expect that in a stationary state a system try (assuming a typical nondegenerate ground state). To should follow an external driving it turns out that due see this, let us consider a solid state Hamiltonian, to the mutual interaction between particles, the system prefers to move on its own and spontaneously switches to N 2 N X pi 1 X a periodic motion with a different period than a period H = + Uij(ri − rj); (1) 2mi 2 of driving. This kind of time crystallization has been re- i=1 i6=j cently realized in laboratories (Choi et al., 2017; Zhang that describes N interacting particles in a finite volume et al., 2017). V with periodic boundary conditions. If we shift all po- In condensed matter physics properties of space crys- sitions ri by the same vector R, the Hamiltonian does tals are often analyzed with the help of space periodic not change because it depends on relative distances be- potentials — it is assumed that a space crystal is already tween particles only. It means that the system possesses formed, i.e. a crystalline structure has emerged. Systems continuous (i.e. vector R can be arbitrary) space transla- that are periodically driven in time by an external force tion symmetry; the corresponding (unitary) space trans- not only can reveal spontaneous breaking of a discrete lation operator TR commutes with H and eigenstates time translation symmetry but can also show solid state n(r1;:::; rN ) of H are also eigenstates of TR, phenomena in the time domain. This research has been i' already initiated and shows that Anderson localization or TR n(r1;:::; rN ) = e n(r1;:::; rN ): (2) Mott insulator phase in the time domain can be observed (Sacha, 2015a). Taking into account Eq. (2) and the fact that In this review article we describe the present status TR n(r1;:::; rN ) = n(r1 + R;:::; rN + R); (3) of the time crystal research. We start with an introduc- tion to the phenomenon of spontaneous space transla- it is easy to show that the probability density for the tion symmetry breaking in solid state systems. Then, we measurement of a single particle must be uniform in space 3 if a system is prepared in the ground state (or any other its lifetime exceeds easily thousands of years. It can be nondegenerate eigenstate), estimated assuming that the center of mass is described −11 Z by a wave-packet localized on a length scale σ ≈ 10 m, h2 ρ(r1 + R) = d(r2 + R) : : : d(rN + R) then, the corresponding kinetic energy is Ek = 2mNσ2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Time Quasilattices in Dissipative Dynamical Systems Abstract Contents
    SciPost Phys. 5, 001 (2018) Time quasilattices in dissipative dynamical systems Felix Flicker1,2 1 Rudolph Peierls Centre for Theoretical Physics, University of Oxford, Department of Physics, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PU, UK 2 Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720 USA fl[email protected] Abstract We establish the existence of ‘time quasilattices’ as stable trajectories in dissipative dy- namical systems. These tilings of the time axis, with two unit cells of different durations, can be generated as cuts through a periodic lattice spanned by two orthogonal directions of time. We show that there are precisely two admissible time quasilattices, which we term the infinite Pell and Clapeyron words, reached by a generalization of the period- doubling cascade. Finite Pell and Clapeyron words of increasing length provide system- atic periodic approximations to time quasilattices which can be verified experimentally. The results apply to all systems featuring the universal sequence of periodic windows. We provide examples of discrete-time maps, and periodically-driven continuous-time dy- namical systems. We identify quantum many-body systems in which time quasilattices develop rigidity via the interaction of many degrees of freedom, thus constituting dissi- pative discrete ‘time quasicrystals’. Copyright F. Flicker. Received 30-10-2017 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Accepted 15-06-2018 Check for Attribution 4.0 International License. Published 03-07-2018 updates Published
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Phase Transitions in Collective Spin Models
    Quantum Phase Transitions in Collective Spin Models. Applications to Adiabatic Quantum Computation Pedro Ribeiro To cite this version: Pedro Ribeiro. Quantum Phase Transitions in Collective Spin Models. Applications to Adiabatic Quantum Computation. Quantum Physics [quant-ph]. Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris VI, 2008. English. NNT : 2008PA066235. tel-00812554 HAL Id: tel-00812554 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00812554 Submitted on 12 Apr 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. i Auteur: Pedro RIBEIRO, Laboratoire de Physique Th´eorique de la Mati`ere Condens´ee, Universit´ePierre et Marie Curie Tour 24, Boˆıte 121, 4, Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France . 2008 ii Transitions de Phase Quantiques dans des Mod`eles de Spin Collectif. Applications au Calcul Adiabatique R´esum´e Partie I: Mod`eles de spin collectif On utilise le formalisme des ´etats coh´erents de spin pour ´etudier des mod`eles de spin collectif, qui ont plusieurs champs d’application en physique. Le mod`ele de Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick (LMG) a en particulier ´et´eanalys´e`ala limite thermodynamique. La m´ethode d´evelopp´ee au cours de ce travail peut ˆetre utilis´ee, en principe, pour des Hamiltoniens plus g´en´eraux, s’´ecrivant en fonction des g´en´erateurs de l’alg`ebre su(2).
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamical Control of Matter Waves in Optical Lattices Sune Schøtt
    Aarhus University Faculty of Science Department of Physics and Astronomy PhD Thesis Dynamical Control of Matter Waves in Optical Lattices by Sune Schøtt Mai November 2010 This thesis has been submitted to the Faculty of Science at Aarhus Uni- versity in order to fulfill the requirements for obtaining a PhD degree in physics. The work has been carried out under the supervision of profes- sor Klaus Mølmer and associate professor Jan Arlt at the Department of Physics and Astronomy. Contents Contents i 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Thesis Outline .......................... 3 1.2 Bose-Einstein Condensation .................. 4 2 Experimental Setup and Methods 9 2.1 Overview ............................. 9 2.2 Magneto-Optic Trap and Optical Pumping .......... 9 2.3 Transport with Movable Quadrupole Traps . 13 2.4 Evaporative Cooling ...................... 14 2.5 Absorption Imaging ....................... 15 3 Optical Lattices 17 3.1 Introduction ........................... 17 3.2 AC Stark-shift Induced Potentials . 18 3.2.1 Classical and Semi-Classical Approaches . 18 3.2.2 Dressed State Picture . 20 3.3 Lattice Band Structure ..................... 22 3.3.1 Reciprocal Space Bloch Theorem . 23 3.3.2 The 1D Lattice Band-Structure . 23 4 Lattice Calibration Techniques 27 4.1 Introduction ........................... 27 4.2 Kapitza-Dirac Scattering .................... 28 4.3 Bloch Oscillation and LZ-Tunneling . 30 4.3.1 Bloch Oscillation .................... 31 4.3.2 Landau-Zener Theory . 31 i ii CONTENTS 4.3.3 Experimental Verification of the Landau-Zener Model 32 4.4 Lattice Modulation ....................... 35 4.5 Summary ............................ 35 5 Dynamically Controlled Lattices 39 5.1 Introduction ........................... 39 5.2 Overview ............................. 39 5.3 Controlled Matter Wave Beam Splitter .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2005.03138V2 [Cond-Mat.Quant-Gas] 23 May 2020 Contents
    Condensed Matter Physics in Time Crystals Lingzhen Guo1 and Pengfei Liang2;3 1Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light (MPL), Staudtstrasse 2, 91058 Erlangen, Germany 2Beijing Computational Science Research Center, 100193 Beijing, China 3Abdus Salam ICTP, Strada Costiera 11, I-34151 Trieste, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Time crystals are physical systems whose time translation symmetry is spontaneously broken. Although the spontaneous breaking of continuous time- translation symmetry in static systems is proved impossible for the equilibrium state, the discrete time-translation symmetry in periodically driven (Floquet) systems is allowed to be spontaneously broken, resulting in the so-called Floquet or discrete time crystals. While most works so far searching for time crystals focus on the symmetry breaking process and the possible stabilising mechanisms, the many-body physics from the interplay of symmetry-broken states, which we call the condensed matter physics in time crystals, is not fully explored yet. This review aims to summarise the very preliminary results in this new research field with an analogous structure of condensed matter theory in solids. The whole theory is built on a hidden symmetry in time crystals, i.e., the phase space lattice symmetry, which allows us to develop the band theory, topology and strongly correlated models in phase space lattice. In the end, we outline the possible topics and directions for the future research. arXiv:2005.03138v2 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 23 May 2020 Contents 1 Brief introduction to time crystals3 1.1 Wilczek's time crystal . .3 1.2 No-go theorem . .3 1.3 Discrete time-translation symmetry breaking .
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Big Time Crystals with Ultracold Atoms
    New J. Phys. 22 (2020) 085004 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/aba3e6 PAPER Creating big time crystals with ultracold atoms OPEN ACCESS Krzysztof Giergiel1,TienTran2, Ali Zaheer2,ArpanaSingh2,AndreiSidorov2,Krzysztof RECEIVED 1 2 1 April 2020 Sacha and Peter Hannaford 1 Instytut Fizyki Teoretycznej, Universytet Jagiellonski, ulica Profesora Stanislawa Lojasiewicza 11, PL-30-348 Krakow, Poland REVISED 2 23 June 2020 Optical Sciences Centre, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected] 8 July 2020 PUBLISHED Keywords: time crystals, Bose–Einstein condensate, ultracold atoms 17 August 2020 Original content from Abstract this work may be used under the terms of the We investigate the size of discrete time crystals s (ratio of response period to driving period) that Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. can be created for a Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) bouncing resonantly on an oscillating Any further distribution mirror. We find that time crystals can be created with sizes in the range s ≈ 20–100 and that such of this work must maintain attribution to big time crystals are easier to realize experimentally than a period-doubling (s=2) time crystal the author(s) and the because they require either a larger drop height or a smaller number of bounces on the mirror. We title of the work, journal citation and DOI. also investigate the effects of having a realistic soft Gaussian potential mirror for the bouncing BEC, such as that produced by a repulsive light-sheet, which is found to make the experiment easier to implement than a hard-wall potential mirror.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Many-Body States Defined Through Conformal Field Theory
    Technische Universität München Max-Planck-Institut für Quantenoptik Quantum many-body states defined through conformal field theory Benedikt Thomas Herwerth Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät für Physik der Technischen Universität München zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) genehmigten Dissertation. Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Alexander Holleitner Prüfer der Dissertation: 1. Hon.-Prof. J. Ignacio Cirac, Ph.D. 2. Prof. Dr. Frank Pollmann Die Dissertation wurde am 01.08.2018 bei der Technischen Universität München eingereicht und durch die Fakultät für Physik am 05.10.2018 angenommen. Abstract In this thesis, we study quantum many-body systems in one (1D) and in two spatial dimen- sions (2D). We adopt the approach established by Moore and Read, where model states are constructed using conformal field theory (CFT), a scale-invariant quantum field theory. The central themes of this thesis are the definition of states through CFT, their characterization, and the understanding of their properties in terms of the underlying CFT. The first part of this thesis considers a CFT with an additional SU(2) symmetry. We define a 1 map from CFT states to those of spin- 2 systems on lattices. In 1D, the CFT vacuum is mapped to the ground state of a Heisenberg-like spin chain with long-range inverse-square interactions. We show that the excited states of this spin chain can be constructed from excitations of the CFT. Thus, we establish a correspondence between the spectrum of the CFT and that of the spin chain. In a next step, we study these states in 2D, where the CFT ground state corresponds to a fractional quantum Hall (FQH) lattice state.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid State Physics II Level 4 Semester 1 Course Content
    Solid State Physics II Level 4 Semester 1 Course Content L1. Introduction to solid state physics - The free electron theory : Free levels in one dimension. L2. Free electron gas in three dimensions. L3. Electrical conductivity – Motion in magnetic field- Wiedemann-Franz law. L4. Nearly free electron model - origin of the energy band. L5. Bloch functions - Kronig Penney model. L6. Dielectrics I : Polarization in dielectrics L7 .Dielectrics II: Types of polarization - dielectric constant L8. Assessment L9. Experimental determination of dielectric constant L10. Ferroelectrics (1) : Ferroelectric crystals L11. Ferroelectrics (2): Piezoelectricity L12. Piezoelectricity Applications L1 : Solid State Physics Solid state physics is the study of rigid matter, or solids, ,through methods such as quantum mechanics, crystallography, electromagnetism and metallurgy. It is the largest branch of condensed matter physics. Solid-state physics studies how the large-scale properties of solid materials result from their atomic- scale properties. Thus, solid-state physics forms the theoretical basis of materials science. It also has direct applications, for example in the technology of transistors and semiconductors. Crystalline solids & Amorphous solids Solid materials are formed from densely-packed atoms, which interact intensely. These interactions produce : the mechanical (e.g. hardness and elasticity), thermal, electrical, magnetic and optical properties of solids. Depending on the material involved and the conditions in which it was formed , the atoms may be arranged in a regular, geometric pattern (crystalline solids, which include metals and ordinary water ice) , or irregularly (an amorphous solid such as common window glass). Crystalline solids & Amorphous solids The bulk of solid-state physics theory and research is focused on crystals.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalability and High-Efficiency of an $(N+ 1) $-Qubit Toffoli Gate Sphere
    Scalability and high-efficiency of an (n + 1)-qubit Toffoli gate sphere via blockaded Rydberg atoms Dongmin Yu1, Yichun Gao1, Weiping Zhang2,3, Jinming Liu1 and Jing Qian1,3,† 1State Key Laboratory of Precision Spectroscopy, Department of Physics, School of Physics and Electronic Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiaotong University and Tsung-Dao Lee Institute, Shanghai 200240, China and 3Collaborative Innovation Center of Extreme Optics, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030006, China∗ The Toffoli gate serving as a basic building block for reversible quantum computation, has man- ifested its great potentials in improving the error-tolerant rate in quantum communication. While current route to the creation of Toffoli gate requires implementing sequential single- and two-qubit gates, limited by longer operation time and lower average fidelity. We develop a new theoretical protocol to construct a universal (n + 1)-qubit Toffoli gate sphere based on the Rydberg blockade mechanism, by constraining the behavior of one central target atom with n surrounding control atoms. Its merit lies in the use of only five π pulses independent of the control atom number n which leads to the overall gate time as fast as 125ns and the average fidelity closing to 0.999. The maximal filling number of control atoms can be∼ up to n = 46, determined by the spherical diame- ter which is equal to the blockade radius, as well as by the nearest neighbor spacing between two trapped-atom lattices. Taking n = 2, 3, 4 as examples we comparably show the gate performance with experimentally accessible parameters, and confirm that the gate errors mainly attribute to the imperfect blockade strength, the spontaneous atomic loss and the imperfect ground-state prepa- ration.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 3: Fermi-Liquid Theory 1 General Considerations Concerning Condensed Matter
    Phys 769 Selected Topics in Condensed Matter Physics Summer 2010 Lecture 3: Fermi-liquid theory Lecturer: Anthony J. Leggett TA: Bill Coish 1 General considerations concerning condensed matter (NB: Ultracold atomic gasses need separate discussion) Assume for simplicity a single atomic species. Then we have a collection of N (typically 1023) nuclei (denoted α,β,...) and (usually) ZN electrons (denoted i,j,...) interacting ∼ via a Hamiltonian Hˆ . To a first approximation, Hˆ is the nonrelativistic limit of the full Dirac Hamiltonian, namely1 ~2 ~2 1 e2 1 Hˆ = 2 2 + NR −2m ∇i − 2M ∇α 2 4πǫ r r α 0 i j Xi X Xij | − | 1 (Ze)2 1 1 Ze2 1 + . (1) 2 4πǫ0 Rα Rβ − 2 4πǫ0 ri Rα Xαβ | − | Xiα | − | For an isolated atom, the relevant energy scale is the Rydberg (R) – Z2R. In addition, there are some relativistic effects which may need to be considered. Most important is the spin-orbit interaction: µ Hˆ = B σ (v V (r )) (2) SO − c2 i · i × ∇ i Xi (µB is the Bohr magneton, vi is the velocity, and V (ri) is the electrostatic potential at 2 3 2 ri as obtained from HˆNR). In an isolated atom this term is o(α R) for H and o(Z α R) for a heavy atom (inner-shell electrons) (produces fine structure). The (electron-electron) magnetic dipole interaction is of the same order as HˆSO. The (electron-nucleus) hyperfine interaction is down relative to Hˆ by a factor µ /µ 10−3, and the nuclear dipole-dipole SO n B ∼ interaction by a factor (µ /µ )2 10−6.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid State Physics 2 Lecture 4: Magnetism in Charge Insulators
    Physics 7450: Solid State Physics 2 Lecture 4: Magnetism in charge insulators Leo Radzihovsky (Dated: 19 February, 2015) Abstract In these lectures, we will study magnetism in insulators. After a warm up with paramagnetism of independent spins, we will discuss the spin exchange interactions in solids, arising from the combination of Coulomb repulsion and Pauli exclusion, and leads to the Heisenberg model of magnetism. Focussing on the simplest ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic states, we will analyze thermodynamics and correlations of low-energy excitations around these states using Holstein- Primakoff and Schwinger bosons descriptions. We will use Jordan-Wigner transformation to solve a one-dimensional spin-1/2 chain. We will discuss coherent-spin states path-integral formulation of magnetism emphasizing, the role of Berry’s phase and will analyze phase transitions using Landau’s mean-field theory of FM and AFM phases. 1 I. INTRODUCTION A. Outline • Paramagnetism • Spin exchange vs dipolar interaction • Heisenberg model and crystalline anisotropies • Hostein-Primakoff and Schwinger bosons • Jordan-Wigner transformation and XXZ chain • Coherent-spin states and Berry phases • Mean-field and Landau theory of FM and AFM states B. Background In these notes we will explore some of aspects of magnetism in charge insulators. Mag- netism is a formation and response of magnetic moments to external magnetic field H and their interaction. In general there are two sources of magnetic moment and associated mag- netization density M. One is quite intuitive, due to orbital charge current j in the material 1 Z M = r × j, 2 r much like current wire loop produces magnetic field.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.08348V3
    Dynamical transitions and critical behavior between discrete time crystal phases 1 1,2, Xiaoqin Yang and Zi Cai ∗ 1Wilczek Quantum Center and Key Laboratory of Artificial Structures and Quantum Control, School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China 2Shanghai Research Center for Quantum Sciences, Shanghai 201315, China In equilibrium physics, spontaneous symmetry breaking and elementary excitation are two con- cepts closely related with each other: the symmetry and its spontaneous breaking not only control the dynamics and spectrum of elementary excitations, but also determine their underlying struc- tures. In this paper, based on an exactly solvable model, we propose a phase ramping protocol to study an excitation-like behavior of a non-equilibrium quantum matter: a discrete time crystal phase with spontaneous temporal translational symmetry breaking. It is shown that slow ramp- ing could induce a dynamical transition between two Z2 symmetry breaking time crystal phases in time domain, which can be considered as a temporal analogue of the soliton excitation spacially sandwiched by two degenerate charge density wave states in polyacetylene. By tuning the ramping rate, we observe a critical value at which point the transition duration diverges, resembling the critical slowing down phenomenon in nonequilibrium statistic physics. We also discuss the effect of stochastic sequences of such phase ramping processes and its implication to the stability of the discrete time crystal phase against noisy perturbations. Usually, the ground state energy of an equilibrium sys- question is how to generalize such an idea into the non- tem does not have much to do with its observable behav- equilibirum quantum matters with intriguing SSB absent ior.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5. Atoms in Optical Lattices
    Strongly correlated systems in atomic and condensed matter physics Lecture notes for Physics 284 by Eugene Demler Harvard University September 18, 2014 2 Chapter 5 Atoms in optical lattices Optical lattices provide a powerful tool for creating strongly correlated many- body systems of ultracold atoms. By choosing different lattice geometries one can obtain very different single particle dispersions. The ratio of the interaction and kinetic energies can be controlled by tuning the depth of the lattice. 5.1 Noninteracting particles in optical lattices The simplest possible periodic optical potential is formed by overlapping two counter-propagating beams. Electric field in the resulting standing wave is E(z) = E0 sin(kz + θ) cos !t (5.1) Here k = 2π/λ is the wavevector of the laser light. Following the general recipe for AC Stark effects, we calculate electric dipolar moments induced by this field in the atoms, calculate interaction between dipolar moments and the electric field, and average over fast optical oscillations (see chapter ??). The result is the potential 2 V (z) = −V0 sin (kz + θ) (5.2) 2 where V0 = α(!)E0 =2, with α(!) being polarizability. It is common to express 2 2 V0 in units of the recoil energy Er = ~ k =2m. In real experiments one also needs to take into account the transverse profile of the beam. Hence V (r?; z) = exp{−2r2=w2(z)g×V (z). In most experiments the main effect of the transverse profile is only to renormalize the parabolic confining potentia. Combining three perpendicular sets of standing waves we get a simple cubic lattice V (r) = −Vx 0 cosqxx − Vy 0 cosqyy − Vz 0 cosqzz (5.3) 3 4 CHAPTER 5.
    [Show full text]