Togiak Wind Resource Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Togiak Wind Resource Report Togiak, Alaska Wind Resource Report Report written by: Douglas Vaught, P.E., V3 Energy, LLC, Eagle River, AK Photo by Doug Vaught Summary Information Togiak’s winds are possibly lighter than expected given its geographic location on the Bering Sea coast. This may be due to the site location well down on the northeast side of the hill that comprises the Togiak Heights subdivision. Possibly more exposed locations would experience higher wind speeds. V3 Energy, LLC 1 of 29 Togiak, Alaska Wind Resource Report Meteorological Tower Data Synopsis Wind power class Class 3 – Fair Wind speed annual average (30 meters) 5.68 m/s Maximum wind gust (2 sec avg) 32.9 m/s (April 2005) Mean wind power density (50 meters) 311 W/m2 (calculated) Mean wind power density (30 meters) 256 W/m2 (measured) Weibull distribution parameters k = 1.75, c = 6.40 m/s Roughness Class 1.11 (fallow field) Power law exponent 0.151 (moderate wind shear) Turbulence Intensity 0.104 Data start date September 11, 2004 Data end date July 12, 2006 Community Profile Current Population: 779 (2005 State Demographer est.) Pronunciation/Other Names: (TOAG-ee-ack) Incorporation Type: 2nd Class City Borough Located In: Unorganized School District: Southwest Region Schools Regional Native Corporation: Bristol Bay Native Corporation Location: Togiak is located at the head of Togiak Bay, 67 miles west of Dillingham. It lies in Togiak National Wildlife Refuge, and is the gateway to Walrus Island Game Sanctuary. It lies at approximately 59.061940° North Latitude and -160.376390° West Longitude. (Sec. 12, T013S, R067W, Seward Meridian.) Togiak is located in the Bristol Bay Recording District. The area encompasses 45.2 sq. miles of land and 183.3 sq. miles of water. History: In 1880, "Old Togiak," or "Togiagamute," was located across the Bay, and had a population of 276. Heavy winter snowfalls made wood-gathering difficult at Old Togiak, so gradually people settled at a new site on the opposite shore, where the task was easier. Many residents of the Yukon-Kuskokwim region migrated south to the Togiak area after the devastating influenza epidemic in 1918-19. A school was established in an old church in 1950. A school building and a National Guard Armory were constructed in 1959. Togiak was flooded in 1964, and many fish racks and stores of gas, fuel oil and stove oil were destroyed. Three or four households left Togiak after the flood and developed the village of Twin Hills upriver. The City government was incorporated in 1969. Culture: Togiak is a traditional Yup'ik Eskimo village with a fishing and subsistence lifestyle. The sale, importation or possession of alcohol is banned in the village. Economy: Togiak's economic base is primarily commercial salmon, herring, and herring roe-on-kelp fisheries. Two hundred forty-four residents hold commercial fishing permits; fishermen use flat-bottom boats for the shallow waters of Togiak Bay. There is one on-shore fish processor and several floating processing facilities near Togiak. The entire community depends heavily on subsistence activities. Salmon, herring, V3 Energy, LLC 2 of 29 Togiak, Alaska Wind Resource Report seal, sea lion, whale and walrus are among the species harvested. A few residents trap. Facilities: Water is derived from a well, is treated and stored in a 500,000-gal. tank. The majority of households (125 residences) are connected to the piped water and sewer system installed in 1976; the remaining homes have new individual wells and septic tanks. Thirty-five new HUD housing units were recently completed in the Togiak Heights Subdivision, with a sewage system. In all, 210 homes are fully plumbed, and 14 are not. The water system is 25 to 30 years old and suffers from broken or corroded pipes, valves and service connections. A new landfill was recently completed. Transportation: A State-owned 4,400' long by 98' wide lighted gravel airstrip with a 1,200' long by 49' wide crosswind airstrip and navigation aids is available. Scheduled and chartered flights are available from Dillingham. Freight is brought in by air or barge and lightered to shore. There are no docking facilities. Skiffs, autos, ATVs and snowmachines are used for local transportation. Climate: Togiak is located in a climatic transition zone, however the arctic climate also affects this region. Average summer temperatures range from 37 to 66; winter temperatures average 4 to 30. Precipitation is 20 to 26 inches annually. Fog and high winds are prevalent during the winter. The Bay is ice-free from June through mid-November. (Above information from State of Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development website, http://www.dced.state.ak.us/) Tower Sensor Information Channel Sensor type Height Multiplier Offset Orientation 1 NRG #40 anemometer 30 m 0.765 0.35 west 2 NRG #40 anemometer 22 m 0.765 0.35 northeast 7 NRG #200P wind vane 30 m 0.351 280 east 9 NRG #110S Temp C 2 m 0.136 -86.383 N/A Site Information and Location Site number 0010 Site Description Open tundra, northeast side of Togiak Heights subdivision Latitude/longitude N 59° 04.278’; W 160° 25.386’ Site elevation 20 meters Datalogger type NRG Symphonie Tower type NRG 30-meter tall tower, 152 mm (6-in) diameter V3 Energy, LLC 3 of 29 Togiak, Alaska Wind Resource Report V3 Energy, LLC 4 of 29 Togiak, Alaska Wind Resource Report Data Quality Control Data was filtered to remove presumed icing events that yield false zero wind speed data. Data that met the following criteria were filtered: wind speed < 1 m/s, wind speed standard deviation = 0, and temperature < 2° C. Note that during the months of March through September little to no data was lost due to icing with some icing loss during the winter months. Because sensor icing was minimal, filtered data was not synthesized and replaced. Ch 1 (30 m speed) Ch 2 (22 m speed) Ch 7 (wind vane) Ch 9 (temperature) Year Month Records Recovery Records Recovery Records Recovery Records Recovery Rate (%) Rate (%) Rate (%) Rate (%) 2004 Sep 2,820 100 2,820 100 2,820 100 2,820 100 2004 Oct 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 2004 Nov 4,182 96.8 4,182 96.8 4,227 97.8 4,320 100 2004 Dec 4,266 95.6 4,182 93.7 2,802 62.8 4,464 100 2005 Jan 4,210 94.3 4,233 94.8 4,002 89.7 4,464 100 2005 Feb 3,910 97.0 3,910 97.0 3,846 95.4 4,032 100 2005 Mar 4,446 100 4,446 100 4,345 97.3 4,446 100 2005 Apr 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 2005 May 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 2005 Jun 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 2005 Jul 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 2005 Aug 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 2005 Sep 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 2005 Oct 4,382 98.2 4,464 100 4,317 96.7 4,464 100 2005 Nov 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 2005 Dec 4,101 91.9 3,774 84.5 3,659 82.0 4,464 100 2006 Jan 4,405 98.7 4,405 98.7 4,464 100 4,464 100 2006 Feb 3,932 97.5 3,932 97.5 4,032 100 4,032 100 2006 Mar 4,382 98.2 4,464 100 4,417 98.9 4,464 100 2006 Apr 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 2006 May 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 4,464 100 2006 Jun 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 4,320 100 2006 Jul 1,638 100 1,638 100 1,638 100 1,638 100 All data 94,914 98.5 94,690 98.3 92,809 96.3 96,312 100 V3 Energy, LLC 5 of 29 Togiak, Alaska Wind Resource Report Measured Wind Speeds The 30 meter anemometer annual wind speed average for the reporting period is 5.68 m/s and the 22 meter anemometer wind speed average is 5.42 m/s. 30 m speed (Ch 1) 22 m speed (Ch 2) Std. Weibull Std. Month Mean Max Dev. Weibull k c Mean Max Dev. (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) (m/s) Jan 5.39 16.9 2.77 2.003 6.07 5.02 16.2 2.68 Feb 7.21 26.1 4.34 1.697 8.06 6.95 25.3 4.45 Mar 6.41 20.8 3.63 1.792 7.18 6.16 19.2 3.49 Apr 6.18 25.8 3.70 1.651 6.86 5.99 24.8 3.59 May 5.16 17.5 2.79 1.873 5.78 5.01 17.4 2.74 Jun 4.80 17.0 2.70 1.799 5.37 4.62 16.4 2.62 Jul 4.65 12.7 2.47 1.880 5.20 4.49 12.3 2.37 Aug 4.99 19.4 2.92 1.718 5.58 4.86 18.4 2.69 Sep 6.05 16.3 3.08 2.017 6.80 5.63 15.5 2.97 Oct 5.48 19.5 3.36 1.652 6.12 5.09 18.8 3.16 Nov 5.67 18.9 3.50 1.604 6.30 5.35 18.7 3.43 Dec 6.28 19.2 3.07 2.115 7.06 5.87 18.5 3.00 Annual 5.68 26.1 3.33 1.745 6.41 5.42 25.3 3.25 V3 Energy, LLC 6 of 29 Togiak, Alaska Wind Resource Report Daily Wind Profile The daily wind profile indicates a strong daily variation of wind speeds with the lowest wind speeds occurring in the morning hours of 6 to 8 a.m.
Recommended publications
  • Scandia Wind Energy Presentation
    Wind Industry in West Michigan: Prepare for Market Share There are approximately 8,000 components in a wind turbine design Source: NEXTENERGY Turbine Components Towers: Nacelle: Foundation: Towers Nacelle Cover Rebar Nacelle Base Concrete Ladders Casings Lifts Heat exchanger Controllers Generator Other: Rotor: Transformers Hub Power Electronics Bolts/Fasteners Nose Cone Wire Blades Lubricants Filtration Paints and Coatings • Composites Lighting • Blade Core Insulation Gearbox Lighting Protection Pitch Mechanisms Steel Working/Machining Drives Pump Drivetrain Communication Devices Brakes Control and Condition Monitoring Equipment Rotary Union Ceramics Shaft Electrical Interface and Electrical Connection Batteries Bearings Brakes Source: NEXTENERGY Top 10 wind turbine manufacturers by megawatts installed worldwide in 2009 • Vestas (Denmark) 35,000 MW • Enercon (Germany) 19,000 MW • Gamesa (Spain) 16,000 MW • GE Energy (Germany / United States) 15,000 MW • Siemens (Denmark / Germany) 8,800 MW • Suzlon (India) 6,000MW • Nordex (Germany) 5,400 MW • Acciona (Spain) 4,300 MW • REpower (Germany) 3,000 MW • Goldwind (China) 2,889 MW US turbine manufacturers • Aeronautica Windpower (USA) • Cascade Wind Corp. (USA) • Clipper Windpower (USA) • General Electric (USA) • Northern Power Systems (USA) • PacWind (USA) • Raum Energy Inc. (Canada - Global supplier of 1.3kW and 3.5kW systems) • Southwest Windpower (USA) Subproviders • ABB Generators, converters and power solutions • American Hofmann Balancing machines for turbines and armatures (USA) • Antec
    [Show full text]
  • Blade Needs for New Generation of Wind Turbines
    Blade Needs for New Generation of Wind Turbines Jonathan Lynch July 20, 2010 Company Profile ¾ Gearless, PM Generator Wind Turbine Manufacturer NP 100 NP 2.2 MW 100 kW direct drive turbine for community, 2.2 MW PM, direct drive turbine net-metering and village power applications High energy capture Manufacturing in 100,000 ft2 Barre, VT Low O&M costs facility Prototype installations in 2010 Selling to North American and EU markets 2 ©2009. Northern Power Systems. All Rights Reserved. Not to be used or shared without permission. Proprietary and Cf Northern Power Overview “New Northern” “Old Northern” ¾Acquired in 2008 by private investors ¾ 30+ year wind turbine experience; ¾ Focus on Permanent Magnet- y Create focused wind turbine company Direct Drive (PMDD) turbines 400 systems installed globally y Commercialize next-generation technology ¾ Strong expertise & IP in PM ¾ Leader in Community Wind generator & power electronics ¾Heavy investment underway with NP 100 y World-class manufacturing & quality systems ¾ Expertise in wide range of turbine y New management ¾ Launching NP 2.2 for sizes (3KW- MW) y Doubled workforce to 170 Utility-Scale marketplace ¾ Company involved in wide variety y Manufacturing in Vermont USA • Prototype turbines 2010 of distributed energy and remote y Offices in Vermont, Boston & Zurich power activities • Pilot series 2011 (Precambrian to 2008) 3 ©2009. Northern Power Systems. All Rights Reserved. Not to be used or shared without permission. Proprietary and Cf Northern Power’s Key Technology Differentiators … Direct Drive Direct drive advantages without cost or weight penalty Higher reliability Permanent Magnet Generator Low turbine cost Better low-wind production Lower maintenance costs Superior power quality Quieter operation FlexPhase™ Power Converter ¾ Lower Cost of Energy 4 ©2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Manufacturing Climate Solutions Carbon-Reducing Technologies and U.S
    Manufacturing Climate Solutions Carbon-Reducing Technologies and U.S. Jobs CHAPTER 11 Wind Power: Generating Electricity and Employment Gloria Ayee, Marcy Lowe and Gary Gereffi Contributing CGGC researchers: Tyler Hall, Eun Han Kim This research is an extension of the Manufacturing Climate Solutions report published in November 2008. It was prepared on behalf of the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (http://www.edf.org/home.cfm). Cover Photo Credits: 1. Courtesy of DOE/NREL, Credit – Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. (formerly PPM Energy, Inc.) 2. Courtesy of DOE/NREL, Credit – Iberdrola Renewables, Inc. (formerly PPM Energy, Inc.) 3. Courtesy of DOE/NREL, Credit – Reseburg, Amanda; Type A Images © September 22, 2009. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University The complete report is available electronically from: http://www.cggc.duke.edu/environment/climatesolutions/ As of September 22, 2009, Chapter 11 is not available in hardcopy. 2 Summary Wind power is a cost effective, renewable energy solution for electricity generation. Wind power can dramatically reduce the environmental impacts associated with power generated from fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas). Electricity production is one of the largest sources of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the United States. Thus, adoption of wind power generating technologies has become a major way for the United States to diversify its energy portfolio and reach its expressed goal of 80% reduction in green house gas (GHG) emissions by the year 2050. The benefits of wind power plants include no fuel risk, no carbon dioxide emissions or air pollution, no hazardous waste production, and no need for mining, drilling or transportation of fuel (American Wind Energy Association, 2009a).
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Distributed Wind Market Report
    2015 Distributed Wind Market Report August 2016 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report is being disseminated by the U.S. Department of Energy. As such, this document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Energy. Though this report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Information Quality Guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget’s Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review, the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study benefited from the advice and comments from several individuals representing industry trade associations, wind turbine manufacturers, project developers, law firms, and other federal laboratories.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Power Systems Windpact Drive Train Alternative Design Study Report
    Revised October 2004 • NREL/SR-500-35524 Northern Power Systems WindPACT Drive Train Alternative Design Study Report April 12, 2001 to January 31, 2005 G. Bywaters, V. John, J. Lynch, P. Mattila, G. Norton, and J. Stowell Northern Power Systems M. Salata General Dynamics Electric Boat O. Labath Gear Consulting Services of Cincinnati A. Chertok and D. Hablanian TIAX National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 Revised October 2004 • NREL/SR-500-35524 Northern Power Systems WindPACT Drive Train Alternative Design Study Report April 12, 2001 to January 31, 2005 G. Bywaters, V. John, J. Lynch, P. Mattila, G. Norton, and J. Stowell Northern Power Systems M. Salata General Dynamics Electric Boat O. Labath Gear Consulting Services of Cincinnati A. Chertok and D. Hablanian TIAX NREL Technical Monitor: A. Laxson Prepared under Subcontract No. YCX-1-30209-02 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSTRUCTION Construction Electrical Acceptance Testing for Wind Energy Sites
    WIND SYSTEMS MAGAZINE GIVING WIND DIRECTION CONSTRUCTION Construction Electrical Acceptance Testing for Wind Energy Sites • Interior issues transmission right-of-way to Deepwater Wind • BASF receives type certification for offshore grout » Ford brings clean energy to dealers through pilot program page 32 » Wetzel blade concept wins DECEMBER 2014DECEMBER Outstanding Venture Award page 36 DECEMBER 2014 Imperial Crane has become Our years of unprecedented safety nationally recognized performance have made Imperial the preferred crane source for companies as the safest crane that put Safety as their number one priority. Our commitment to safety and company in the service has been the key to Imperial’s success. On behalf of Imperial Crane crane rental and the Bohne family, we would like to thank the industry for 45 years of industry. loyal support. Imperial Crane and our team of dedicated employees look forward to providing many more years of Safety Success. Hydraulic Truck Cranes 35 ton to 600 ton Boom Trucks 10 ton to 50 ton with boom reach over 200’ Carry Deck Cranes 8.5 ton to 22 ton Crawler Cranes up to 352 ton Rough Terrain Cranes 15 ton to 160 ton Conventional Truck Cranes up to 300 ton Material Handlers www.imperialcrane.com 1-888-HOIST IT 0.56 EMR Authorized Dealer For: inFOCUS: CONSTRUCTION DECEMBER 2014 14 Electrical Acceptance Testing for Wind Energy Sites ALSO IN INFOCUS By Paul Idziak 20 Department of the Interior 18 Record low costs drive opportunities for issues transmission right- the U.S. wind energy industry of-way to Deepwater Wind 20 BASF receives type certification for 25 Mortenson completes offshore grout Windthorst II for OwnEnergy 2 DECEMBER | 2014 TORK ELECTRONIC DIGITAL CONTROLLED S O L UTI O N S A V A I L A B L E TORQUE TECHNOLOGY .
    [Show full text]
  • Improve Energy Production by Using High Efficiency Smart Wind Turbine Blade
    IMPROVE ENERGY PRODUCTION BY USING HIGH EFFICIENCY SMART WIND TURBINE BLADE by JIALE LI Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Professor Xiong (Bill) Yu Department of Civil Engineering CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY May, 2018 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUTAE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of Jiale Li Candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy* Committee Chair Dr. Xiong Yu Committee Member Dr. Xiangwu Zeng Committee Member Dr. Yue Li Committee Member Dr. David Matthiesen Committee Member Dr. Mingguo Hong Date of Defense 3/22/2018 *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................... I LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... VIII LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ X ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................... XVI ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................. XVIII CHAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW ......................... 1 1.1 Background .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Turbine
    March 2020 IEA Wind TCP Task 37 Definition of the IEA Wind 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Turbine Technical Report A iea wind Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind Evan Gaertner1, Jennifer Rinker2, Latha Sethuraman1, Frederik Zahle2, Benjamin Anderson1, Garrett Barter1, Nikhar Abbas1, Fanzhong Meng2, Pietro Bortolotti1, Witold Skrzypinski2, George Scott1, Roland Feil1, Henrik Bredmose2, Katherine Dykes2, Matt Shields1, Christopher Allen3, and Anthony Viselli3 1 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 2 Technical University of Denmark 3 University of Maine Suggested Citation Gaertner, Evan, Jennifer Rinker, Latha Sethuraman, Frederik Zahle, Benjamin Anderson, Garrett Barter, Nikhar Abbas, Fanzhong Meng, Pietro Bortolotti, Witold Skrzypinski, George Scott, Roland Feil, Henrik Bredmose, Katherine Dykes, Matt Shields, Christopher Allen, and Anthony Viselli. 2020. Definition of the IEA 15-Megawatt Offshore Reference Wind. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5000-75698. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75698.pdf NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5000-75698 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC March 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, CO 80401 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored in part by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding provided by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Distributed Wind Market Report
    2017 DISTRIBUTED WIND MARKET REPORT 2017 Distributed Wind Market Report July 2018 DRAFT REPORT DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. This report is being disseminated by the U.S. Department of Energy. As such, this document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the U.S. Department of Energy. Though this report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in the U.S. Department of Energy’s Information Quality Guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget’s Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review, the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study benefited from the advice and comments from two wind turbine manufacturers, one project developer, one state agency representative, and two federal laboratory staff.
    [Show full text]
  • On-Site Wind Power • Manufacturers, Benefits, Costs
    Issue 26 • August 8, 2011 In this report: On-Site Wind Power • Manufacturers, Benefits, Costs • Latest Developments & Trends • Adoption by Business • Projections • Q&As with The Kroger Co., Adbobe Systems EL Insights: On-Site Wind Power On-Site Wind Power at a Glance Wind power is one of several types of on-site renewable generation that companies may choose to install at their commercial or industrial facilities. On-site turbines can range from small models of less than 1 kW all the way up to utility-scale models of one megawatt (MW) or more. Manufacturers About 250 companies around the world make or have plans to make small wind turbines (100 kW or less), and of these 95 are U.S.-based. But the vast majority of these companies are in start-up phases: only about 47 small turbine makers, 12 in the U.S., had begun to sell commercially by the start of 2010. About 95 percent of small wind units sold in the U.S. in 2009 were produced domestically. The five largest manufacturers of small turbines in 2009, in kW sold, were Southwest Windpower (U.S.-based, 11,700 kW); Northern Power Systems (U.S., 9,200); Proven Energy (U.K., 3,700); Wind Energy Solutions (Netherlands, 3,700); and Bergey WindPower Co. (U.S., 2,100).1 Among all turbine manufacturers, GE has maintained far and away the biggest market share over the past three years. In 2010 it garnered 49.7 percent of the U.S. market (by total capacity of turbines sold), followed by Siemens (16.2 percent), Gamesa (11), Mitsubishi (6.8), Suzlon (6.1), and Vestas (4.3 percent, down markedly from a second-place finish in 2008 and 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Using More of the Grid We've
    north american Volume 14, Number 8 I September 2017 Using More Of The Grid We’ve Got Technology advances – and a few policy tweaks – can increase wind delivery over existing transmission lines. page 20 Spotlight: Canada How one agency is advancing wind energy north of the border. page 14 Spotlight: South Dakota At long last, the state may finally achieve its wind potential. page 18 a_01_NAW1709.indd 1 8/17/17 3:31 PM _Suzlon_1708.indd 1 7/11/17 11:07 AM Contents Features 14 Spotlight 14 How One Agency Is Advancing Canadian Wind Energy Natural Resources Canada’s CanmetENERGY advances the knowledge, understanding and capabilities of the wind industry. Spotlight 18 A Wind Energy Boom Is Coming To South Dakota Once a laggard, the state now suddenly packs a powerful punch, which could be meaningful to developers. 20 Using More Of The Grid We’ve Got There is ample opportunity to increase wind delivery over existing transmission lines. 24 Extending Life To Your Turbines Changes to the design of wind turbines create additional demands on lubricants that are used in the wind power industry. 18 20 24 Departments 4 Wind Bearings 6 New & Noteworthy 12 Products & Technology 27 Policy Watch 31 Projects & Contracts North American Windpower • September 2017 • 3 b_NAW_2_13.28_36_1709.indd 3 8/18/17 12:44 PM Wind Bearings www.nawindpower.com [email protected] 100 Willenbrock Road, Oxford, CT 06478 Toll Free: (800) 325-6745 A Mission For Phone: (203) 262-4670 Fax: (203) 262-4680 Transmission MICHAEL BATES Publisher & Vice President [email protected] Mark Del Franco MARK DEL FRANCO Associate Publisher (203) 262-4670, ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Turbine Research Program Cold Weather Turbine Project
    August 2004 • NREL/SR-500-36289 Turbine Research Program Cold Weather Turbine Project Period of Performance: May 27, 1999—March 31, 2004 J. Lynch, G. Bywaters, D. Costin, S. Hoskins, P. Mattila, and J. Stowell Northern Power Systems Waitsfield, Vermont National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 August 2004 • NREL/SR-500-36289 Turbine Research Program Cold Weather Turbine Project Period of Performance: May 27, 1999—March 31, 2004 J. Lynch, G. Bywaters, D. Costin, S. Hoskins, P. Mattila, and J. Stowell Northern Power Systems Waitsfield, Vermont NREL Technical Monitor: B. Smith Prepared under Subcontract No. XAT-9-29200-01 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Operated for the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]