• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

IFT-UAM/CSIC-19-53 Quantum Theory of Triboelectricity Robert Alicki1, ∗ and Alejandro Jenkins1, 2, 3, † 1International Centre for Theory of Quantum Technologies (ICTQT), University of Gda´nsk, 80-308, Gda´nsk, Poland 2Laboratorio de F´ısica Te´orica y Computacional, Escuela de F´ısica, Universidad de Costa Rica, 11501-2060, San Jos´e, Costa Rica 3Instituto de F´ısica Te´orica UAM/CSIC, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain (Dated: First version: 21 Apr. 2019. Published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 186101 (2020)) We propose a microphysical theory of the triboelectric effect by which mechanical rubbing sepa- rates charges across the interface between two materials. Surface electrons are treated as an open system coupled to two baths, corresponding to the bulks. Extending Zel’dovich’s theory of bosonic superradiance, we show that motion-induced population inversion can generate an electromotive force. We argue that this is consistent with the basic phenomenology of triboelectrification and tri- boluminescence as irreversible processes, and we suggest how to carry out more precise experimental tests. INTRODUCTION the irreversible dynamics of work extraction by a quan- tum system coupled to an external disequilibrium has The word electricity comes from the ancient Greek become a subject of theoretical and practical interest in ¢ÐekØÖÓÒ for amber, a solid material that charges when quantum thermodynamics [5]. rubbed with silk or fur. In the sixth century BCE, pre- In 1971, Zel’dovich described a process, later dubbed Socratic philosopher Thales of Miletus pointed to mag- “superradiance” by Misner, by which the kinetic energy nets and amber as evidence of “a soul or life even to inan- of a moving dielectric can be partially converted into co- imate objects” [1, 2]. The microphysics of dry friction herent radiation [6, 7]. This result played a key role in the remains poorly understood and there is still no widely development of black-hole thermodynamics and it pro- accepted theory of triboelectrification, the separation of vides a useful guide to a broad class of active, irreversible charges by rubbing. The Bohr–van Leeuwen theorem es- processes [8, 9]. As in a laser, superradiance depends tablishes that classical physics cannot explain the prop- on population inversion, which in the case of rotational erties of magnetic materials [3], but it is less widely ap- superradiance results from the disequilibrium associated preciated that classical electrodynamics is insufficient to with the dielectric’s macroscopic motion. Work may then account for triboelectricity. be extracted from the population-inverted states through Consider the triboelectric generator shown schemati- stimulated emission while generating entropy in the ro- cally in Fig. 1. The inner cylinder of material A rotates tating dielectric, which we may treat as a moving heat about its axis with angular velocity Ω. For the right bath [10]. choice of material B in the outer, hollow cylinder, a volt- The exclusion principle prevents stimulated emission age is established between A and B, which can sustain a of fermions, and therefore their superradiance. However, current I through an external circuit. The classical elec- we will show here that the motion-induced population tromotive force (emf) E vanishes by the Maxwell-Faraday inversion of fermions can sustain a macroscopic current law: between two baths coupled to those fermion states. Such d a process has not, to our knowledge, been considered be- E ≡ E · ds = − B · da =0, (1) fore, although the authors of [11] noted the presence of I dt Z Fermi surfaces of singularities in the Green’s functions as there is no significant variation of the net magnetic of fermions in the background of a charged black hole. flux through the plane of the circuit. Thus, at the inter- Here we argue that this offers a plausible theory of tribo- electricity, including such remarkable phenomena as the arXiv:1904.11997v5 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 21 Dec 2020 face between the two materials A and B, electrons are being transported against the average electric field by a generation of X-rays by peeling ordinary adhesive tape nonconservative force (the emf), effectively acting as a [12, 13]. negative resistance. The power for this evidently comes Experimentalists have stressed that triboelectrification from the motor that spins A. But how mechanical energy and associated effects depend strongly on the relative ve- is converted into the electrical work done by the emf calls locity of the materials in contact and are therefore es- for explanation. sentially off equilibrium [14]. The process that we de- Note that the generation of an emf by the relative mo- scribe here is irreversible and velocity dependent. As tion of A and B must be irreversible, since the direction such, it is qualitatively different from the reversible pro- of the emf cannot depend on the sign of Ω. On the emf as cesses, describable in terms of Hamiltonians, considered an active nonconservative force, and on the impossibility in recently proposed theories of the triboelectric effect of accounting for it using potentials, see [4]. Recently, [15] and the related phenomenon of contact electrification 2 and A † HΩ = ωA(κ,m) − mΩ cA(κ,m)cA(κ,m) (5) Xκ,m The sign of Ω in Eqs. (4) and (5) is arbitrary and has been chosen for later convenience. The shift from the H0’s to the HΩ’s may be interpreted as a Doppler shift. The experimental evidence is now clear that triboelec- FIG. 1. The triboelectric generator sketched maintains a cur- trification of solids is dominated by electron tunneling rent I along the circuit if an external motor spins the cylinder processes [18]. We therefore consider a weak interaction A R of material and radius at a sufficient angular velocity Ω between the surface electrons and each of the two baths, with respect to another material B. x x † HX = gX (κ,σ,m)cX (κ,m)cx(σ, m) + h.c., (6) κ,σ,mX [16]. More details on the theoretical and experimental x motivations for our non-Hamiltonian, open-system the- where the gX ’s correspond to direct transition ampli- ory of triboelectricity are provided in the Supplemental tudes, to which the Coulomb interaction probably con- Material [17]. tributes significantly. We expect the surface states a and b to be localized along the transport direction (i.e., perpendicular to the OPEN SYSTEM surface), so that their mutual interaction plays no role in transport. We therefore neglect ab interactions, which Consider surface electrons as an open quantum system, would give only a hybridization absorbable into modified weakly coupled to two baths corresponding to bulk mate- wave functions. Moreover, since the ab interaction is not rials A and B. In accordance with the setup of Fig. 1, we needed to obtain a triboelectric effect, it is reasonable to assume cylindrical symmetry so that each electron mode, neglect it for the sake of simplicity since our present goal both in the surface and in the bulk, is labeled by the com- is to formulate a qualitatively new model rather than a mon magnetic quantum number m (our final results will detailed one. We therefore take the full Hamiltonian to not, however, depend on this cylindrical symmetry). Any be remaining quantum numbers are labeled by σ and κ. a b A B a a b b The second-quantization formalism and notation are Hfull = HΩ +H0 +HΩ +H0 +HA +HB +HA +HB. (7) similar to those applied to rotational superradiance in [10]. Annihilation and creation operators are, respec- † KINETIC EQUATIONS tively, denoted by c ·(·, ·) and c ·(·, ·), while the corre- sponding energies are denoted by ω (·, ·). The subsystem · The occupation numbers for the surface electron states is indicated by the index, while the quantum numbers of are: the mode are given as arguments. We work in ~ = 1 units. † nx(σ, m)= cx(σ, m)cx(σ, m) . (8) At rest, the system Hamiltonian is the sum of terms In the limit of weak coupling between the system and x † xX H0 = ωx(σ, m)cx(σ, m)cx(σ, m) (2) the baths, we may compute the decay rates γ↓ using Xσ,m xX Fermi’s golden rule [19, 20]. The pumping rates γ↑ are related to the decay rates by the Kubo-Martin-Schwinger for x = a,b, with a corresponding to the surface attached (KMS) condition. Omitting the quantum numbers, the to material A, and b corresponding to the surface at- corresponding kinetic equation may be written as tached to material B. Meanwhile, the Hamiltonians for xA xB xA xB xA xB the baths are n˙ x = γ↑ + γ↑ − γ↓ + γ↓ + γ↑ + γ↑ nx. (9) X † H0 = ωX (κ,m)cX (κ,m)cX (κ,m) (3) Let us define X κ,m 1 nX (y) ≡ , (10) for X = A, B. eβ(y−µX ) +1 If the material A rotates with an angular velocity Ω where µX is the chemical potential of the corresponding small enough that its internal states are not excited by bulk material in equilibrium. the rotation, then we have effective Hamiltonians By Fermi’s golden rule, the rate of decay of the a sur- a † face electrons into the bath A is HΩ = ωa(σ, m) − mΩ ca(σ, m)ca(σ, m) (4) aA a 2 Xσ,m γ↓ (σ, m)=2π 1 − nA(ωa(σ, m)) gA (σ, m), (11) 3 where For each channel (σ, m), the number of electrons per unit time that flow from A to a is a 2 a 2 gA (σ, m) ≡ |gA(κ,σ,m)| δ ωa(σ, m) − ωA(κ,m) . Xκ j = γaA − γaA + γaA n¯ . (20) (12) a ↑ ↓ ↑ a For the pumping rate we have, by the KMS condition, By Eqs.

Load more

  8

Copy Link