DOCSLIB.ORG

S1 Report-Causeway EA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S1 Report-Causeway EA Stage 1 Archaeological Background Study Class Environmental Assessment Widening & Rehabilitation of James A. Gifford Causeway Geographic Townships of Smith and Ennismore Peterborough County ORIGINAL REPORT 144 Upper Turriff Road, LʼAmable, Ontario K0L 2L0 - tel.: (705) 201-1066 - fax: 866-231-6071 - [email protected] G www.centralarchaeology.ca Stage 1 Archaeological Background Study Class Environmental Assessment Widening & Rehabilitation of James A. Gifford Causeway Geographic Townships of Smith and Ennismore Peterborough County Prepared for: Steve Taylor President Bytown Engineering Inc. 100 Centrepointe Drive, Suite 202 Ottawa, ON K2G 6B1 Ph: 613.228.4813 E: [email protected] Prepared by: Laura McRae Director and Chief Archaeologist Derek Paauw President and Chief Archaeologist The Central Archaeology Group Inc. 144 Upper Turriff Road LʼAmable K0L 2LO T. 705.201.1066 F. 866.231.6071 Licence No. P248 PIF No. P248-069-2012 March 6, 2013 ORIGINAL REPORT Distribution:" Bytown Engineering """Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Bringing the past to the present for the future Project Personnel Project Director Laura McRae, P248 Research Laura McRae Don Meskis Photographer Derek Paauw, P272 Report Preparation Laura McRae THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND STUDY CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, JAMES A. GIFFORD CAUSEWAY GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIPS OF SMITH AND ENNISMORE, PETERBOROUGH COUNTY" ii"" Acknowledgements The Central Archaeology Group would like to extend their gratitude to the following individuals and parties. ! Steve Taylor, President, Bytown Engineering Inc. ! The staff at the Peterborough County Land Registry, Peterborough. ! The Geomatics Institute at Sir Sandford Fleming College Frost Campus, Lindsay. ! The staff at the National Air Photo LIbrary, Ottawa. ! The staff at the Trent University Maps and Geospatial Resources section of the Thomas J. Bata Library, Peterborough. ! Robert von Bitter, Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND STUDY CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, JAMES A. GIFFORD CAUSEWAY GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIPS OF SMITH AND ENNISMORE, PETERBOROUGH COUNTY" iii"" Executive Summary Described within this report are the details of an archaeological assessment conducted for the proposed Widening & Rehabilitation of the James A. Gifford Causeway in the Township of Smith-Ennismore-Lakefield. The project area extends across Chemong Lake and provides a thoroughfare between the townships of Smith and Ennismore in Peterborough County. It encompasses a total distance of approximately 1.2 kilometres and is located on County Road 14, 350 metres west of County Road 18. The archaeological study will form part of a Class Environmental Assessment (EA) being undertaken by the Corporation of the County of Peterborough. The purpose of the proposed EA is to address the “significant erosion and slope stability issues which are compromising the integrity of the Causeway, guide-rail and road surface” (Corporation of the County of Peterborough 2011:2). Bytown Engineering Inc. was contracted by the Corporation of the County of Peterborough (2011:2) to undertake a Class Environmental Assessment, traffic capacity analysis and preparation of preliminary design drawings for the rehabilitation and potential widening of the Causeway and sub-contracted The Central Archaeology Group Inc. to conduct the Stage 1 background study for the project area. Therefore, the information presented within this Stage 1 report is intended to identify archaeological resources and in turn inform future planning decisions regarding the proposed Widening & Rehabilitation of the James A. Gifford Causeway. As an initial requirement of land use planning and development, the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport has legislated that three objectives must be met by way of a Stage 1 archaeological study. These objectives include: 1) provide information on the subject property!s geography, history, previous archaeological fieldwork and current land condition; 2) evaluate the archaeological potential for the property and support recommendations for a Stage 2 survey; and, 3) recommend appropriate strategies for future assessments within the property. Therefore, the main purpose of the Stage 1 assessment is to investigate the cultural land use, archaeological history and the present conditions of the property. The majority of this process is background research conducted in the company office and other libraries and involves the examination of records such as historic settlement maps, land titles and documents, historical land use and ownership records, primary and secondary sources and the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport!s archaeological sites database. The Stage 1 archaeological background study will outline the First Nations pre-contact and historic archaeological sequence as well as the Euro-Canadian historic settlement record for the area and the potential for the discovery of archaeological sites within the project area. Based on background research, the study establishes the potential for the discovery of significant archaeological sites, particularly in the immediate vicinity of historic settlement areas, lakes, rivers and streams.. THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND STUDY CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, JAMES A. GIFFORD CAUSEWAY GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIPS OF SMITH AND ENNISMORE, PETERBOROUGH COUNTY" iv"" Based on the results of the archaeological assessment for the James A. Gifford Causeway project area, the following recommendations are provided for consideration to the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport and the Corporation of the County of Peterborough, and are subject to approval by the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport: 1) Areas that have been identified as having moderate to high potential undergo a Stage 2 test pit survey, where shovel-sized test pits, no smaller than 30.0 cm in diameter, be excavated into the first 5.0 cm of subsoil to examine for stratigraphy, cultural features, or evidence of fill at 5.0 m intervals. Soil should be screened through mesh no greater than 6.0 mm and all test pits should be backfilled unless instructed to do otherwise. 2) Areas that have been identified as having low potential undergo a Stage 2 test pit survey, where shovel-sized test pits, no smaller than 30.0 cm in diameter, be excavated into the first 5.0 cm of subsoil to examine for stratigraphy, cultural features, or evidence of fill at 10.0 m intervals. Soil should be screened through mesh no greater than 6.0 mm and all test pits should be backfilled unless instructed to do otherwise. 3) If development work is planned for portions of the Causeway which stretch across Chemong Lake, an underwater archaeological assessment is recommended. This assessment should be conducted by a professional, marine archaeologist, licensed by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. This report is submitted to the Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, C. 0.18. The report is reviewed to ensure that it complies with the standards and guidelines that are issued by the Minister, and that the archaeological fieldwork and report recommendations ensure the conservation, protection and preservation of the cultural heritage of Ontario. When all matters relating to archaeological sites within the project area of a development proposal have been addressed to the satisfaction of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport, a letter will be issued by the ministry stating that there are no further concerns with regards to alterations to archaeological sites by the proposed development. It is an offense under Sections 48 and 69 of the Ontario Heritage Act for any party other than a licensed archaeologist to make any alteration to a known archaeological site or to remove any artifact or other physical evidence of past human use or activity from the site, until such time as a licensed archaeologist has completed archaeological fieldwork on the site, submitted a report to the Minister stating that the site has no further cultural heritage value or interest, and the report has been filed in the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Report referred to in Section 65.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Should previously undocumented archaeological resources be discovered, they may be a new archaeological site and therefore subject to Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. The proponent or person discovering the archaeological resources must cease alteration of the site immediately and engage a licensed consultant archaeologist to carry out archaeological fieldwork, in compliance with Section 48 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act. THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND STUDY CLASS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, JAMES A. GIFFORD CAUSEWAY GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIPS OF SMITH AND ENNISMORE, PETERBOROUGH COUNTY" v"" The Cemeteries Act, R.S.O. 1990 C. 4 and the Funeral, Burial and Cremation services Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, C. 33 (when proclaimed in force) require that any person discovering human remains must notify the police or coroner and the Registrar of Cemeteries at the Ministry of Consumer Services. The licensee shall hold the archaeological collections, including copies of the study material and original notes generated during the course of research, in trust, unless it is transferred to an appropriate public institution
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capsule Railway History of Peterborough County
    23ae Peterborough County – A Capsule Railway History BACKGROUND Before the Railway Age, travel and the movement of goods in Upper Canada were primarily dependent on wa- terways, and primitive trails that passed for roads. Needless to say, both of these modes of transportation relied very much on the weather of the seasons. Agitation for a more efficient mode of transportation had started to build with the news of the new-fangled railroad, but the economic depression of 1837 and the years following were bad years for Upper Canada and for railway development, especially in view of the unsettled economic and political conditions in England, on whose financial houses the crucial investment in railway ventures de- pended. However, in 1849 the Province of Canada passed the Railway Guarantee Act which guaranteed the interest on loans for the construction of railways not less than 75 miles in length. It was this legislation that trig- gered Canada's railway building boom. While the Grand Trunk Railway of Canada (GTR), incorporated in 1852, busied itself with its trunk line along Lake Ontario, the waterfront towns were busy with their own railway ambitions. They saw themselves as gate- ways to the untapped resources of the "hinterland". Thus emerged a pattern of "development roads" from Whit- by, Port Hope, Cobourg, Trenton, Belleville, Napanee, Kingston, Brockville and Prescott. (Toronto had already led the way with its portage road to Collingwood, and later participated in additional development roads to Owen Sound and Coboconk.) North of Lake Ontario were rich natural resources and a rapidly expanding population as successive waves of immi- grants had to seek land further north from Lake Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Mon 18 Apr 2005 / Lun 18 Avr 2005
    No. 130A No 130A ISSN 1180-2987 Legislative Assembly Assemblée législative of Ontario de l’Ontario First Session, 38th Parliament Première session, 38e législature Official Report Journal of Debates des débats (Hansard) (Hansard) Monday 18 April 2005 Lundi 18 avril 2005 Speaker Président Honourable Alvin Curling L’honorable Alvin Curling Clerk Greffier Claude L. DesRosiers Claude L. DesRosiers Hansard on the Internet Le Journal des débats sur Internet Hansard and other documents of the Legislative Assembly L’adresse pour faire paraître sur votre ordinateur personnel can be on your personal computer within hours after each le Journal et d’autres documents de l’Assemblée législative sitting. The address is: en quelques heures seulement après la séance est : http://www.ontla.on.ca/ Index inquiries Renseignements sur l’index Reference to a cumulative index of previous issues may be Adressez vos questions portant sur des numéros précédents obtained by calling the Hansard Reporting Service indexing du Journal des débats au personnel de l’index, qui vous staff at 416-325-7410 or 325-3708. fourniront des références aux pages dans l’index cumulatif, en composant le 416-325-7410 ou le 325-3708. Copies of Hansard Exemplaires du Journal Information regarding purchase of copies of Hansard may Pour des exemplaires, veuillez prendre contact avec be obtained from Publications Ontario, Management Board Publications Ontario, Secrétariat du Conseil de gestion, Secretariat, 50 Grosvenor Street, Toronto, Ontario, M7A 50 rue Grosvenor, Toronto (Ontario) M7A 1N8. Par 1N8. Phone 416-326-5310, 326-5311 or toll-free téléphone : 416-326-5310, 326-5311, ou sans frais : 1-800-668-9938.
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment Report
    Toronto Transit Commission / City of Toronto EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT TRANSIT PROJECT ASSESSMENT STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT REPORT APPENDIX C – CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE ASSESSMENT REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCE ASSESSMENT REPORT: ASSESSMENT REPORT: BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCES & BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCES & CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPES CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPES PRELIMINARY PLANNING FOR A TRANSIT PRELIMINARY PLANNING FOR A TRANSIT PROJECT ASSESSMENT STUDY PROJECT ASSESSMENT STUDY EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) EGLINTON CROSSTOWN LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT (LRT) MARTIN GROVE ROAD TO KENNEDY TTC STATION MARTIN GROVE ROAD TO KENNEDY TTC STATION LESTER B. PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXTENSION LESTER B. PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT EXTENSION CITY OF TORONTO CITY OF TORONTO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO February 2010 February 2010 Prepared for: Prepared for: Transit City Group Transit City Group Prepared by: Prepared by: Unterman McPhail Associates Heritage Resource Management Consultants 540 Runnymede Road Toronto, Ontario, M6S 2Z7 Tel: 416-766-7333 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 Page 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT & CULTURAL HERITAGE RESOURCES 2 Figure 1. Location of Lester B. Pearson International Airport 2.1 Ontario Environmental Assessment Act (EAA) 3 Extension Study Corridor, City of Toronto [TTC, 2009]. 1 2.2 Transit Projects Regulation (Ontario Regulation 231/08) 4 Figure 2: Location of Eglinton Crosstown LRT Study Corridor, City of 2.3 Ontario Heritage Act (OHA) 4 Toronto [TTC, 2009]. 2 2.4 Ministry of Tourism and Culture 5 3.0 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 6 3.1 Introduction 6 3.2 Public Consultation and Recognition 7 LIST OF TABLES 4.0 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 8 4.1 Township of Etobicoke, Township of York and Township of Page Scarborough, County of York 8 4.1.1 Former Hamlets and Villages 18 Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom Liberty
    2013 ACCESS AND PRIVACY Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner Ontario, Canada FREEDOM & LIBERTY 2013 STATISTICS In free and open societies, governments must be accessible and transparent to their citizens. TABLE OF CONTENTS Requests by the Public ...................................... 1 Provincial Compliance ..................................... 3 Municipal Compliance ................................... 12 Appeals .............................................................. 26 Privacy Complaints .......................................... 38 Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA) .................................. 41 As I look back on the past years of the IPC, I feel that Ontarians can be assured that this office has grown into a first-class agency, known around the world for demonstrating innovation and leadership, in the fields of both access and privacy. STATISTICS 4 1 REQUESTS BY THE PUBLIC UNDER FIPPA/MFIPPA There were 55,760 freedom of information (FOI) requests filed across Ontario in 2013, nearly a 6% increase over 2012 where 52,831 were filed TOTAL FOI REQUESTS FILED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,995 17,334 34,329 Provincial 7,029 14,402 21,431 Total 24,024 31,736 55,760 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY JURISDICTION AND RECORDS TYPE Personal Information General Records Total Municipal 16,726 17,304 34,030 Provincial 6,825 13,996 20,821 Total 23,551 31,300 54,851 TOTAL FOI REQUESTS COMPLETED BY SOURCE AND JURISDICTION Municipal Provincial Total
    [Show full text]
  • Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Project
    Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 1 of 13 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Project Identifying a Natural Heritage System (NHS) for the Kawartha Region kawarthasnaturally.ca Report CSD12-014 Page 2 of 13 Protecting Your Natural Environmental and Cultural Heritage in the Kawarthas Report CSD12-014 Page 3 of 13 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected is a Priority Action for Sustainable Peterborough…………… Natural Assets Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 4 of 13 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Project Identifying a Natural Heritage System (NHS) Natural Heritage Systems • “…a system made up of natural heritage features and areas linked by natural corridors which are necessary to maintain biodiversity…can include lands that have been restored and areas with potential to be restored…” (Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) 2005) • A system that maintains the health of the landscape, and the health of our communities. • An essential backbone of sustainability, including economic. • A system of green infrastructure providing critical ecosystem services. Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 5 of 13 Many organizations and agencies are involved in land management but are their activities integrated? Southern Ontario: A Fragmented Landscape Report CSD12-014 Kawarthas, Naturally Connected Page 6 of 13 What is a Natural Heritage System (NHS)? • Features and areas: – Wetlands – Woodlands – Lakes – Streams – Meadows – Cultural Heritage Features – Plants and animals they contain D. Puric-Mladenovic – Respects cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Agenda Was Developed Simultaneously with the 2013- 2015 Business Plan
    PETERBOROUGH – LAKEFIELD POLICE SERVICES BOARD STRATEGIC AGENDA November 2012 INDEX page Introduction 3 Basic Assumptions 5 Observations and Analysis 6 Police Priorities 11 List of Reference Documents 13 MPM Consulting Hodgson Associates Page 2 Introduction As part of its regular business planning process, the Peterborough Lakefield Police Services Board decided to create a corollary report that would focus on a period much longer than the three year timeframe for the Business Plan. This Strategic Agenda was developed simultaneously with the 2013- 2015 Business Plan. Information gained through review of existing documentation as well as observations and opinions provided during the consultation phase of the business planning process, provided the basis for the recommendations contained in the Strategic Agenda. The Peterborough Lakefield Police Service is considered a leader in the provision of community based policing. By following the principles and priorities contained in the Strategic Agenda, the Board can continue this strong commitment to the communities it represents. The Strategic Agenda depends on projections that have already been developed with respect to the long term changes identified for both communities. By studying these trends, the Board can develop general directions for the Peterborough Lakefield Community Police Service that will direct the planning process and provide guidance for changes that are planned for the operation and administration of the Police Service. Ultimately the Strategic Agenda should provide a basis for fundamental organizational improvements that will occur in the next few decades. It should also assist the Board in determining which financial, and human resource, investments best reflect the realities in these changing communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Communiqué Issue August 19, 2021
    Communiqué Issue August 19, 2021 2021-5 The Requirements, Recommendations and Guidelines in this Communiqué are applicable to the social housing providers administered by the City of Hamilton. ✓ Providers Under Housing Services Act, 2011 ✓ Providers Under a Federal Operating Agreement ✓ Requirement Recommendation ✓ Guidelines For Information Purposes Only SUBJECT: 2022 Indices and Cost Factors BACKGROUND: The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) provides Cost Factors and Indices to calculate subsidies under the Housing Services Act, 2011 (HSA) on an annual basis. The factors and indices which need to be used in the calculation of rent and subsidies for 2022 are attached to this Communiqué and are listed follows: • SH notification release 20-01 2022 Market Rent Index & Indices for Non-Profit Projects under the H.S.A. which includes: o Guide to Attachment A: 2022 Market Rent Index Table o Attachment B – 2022 Indices for Mixed Non-Profit Projects o Attachment C – 2022 Indices for 100% RGI Non-Profit Projects o Guide to Attachments B & C: 2022 Indices for Mixed Non-Profit and 100% RGI Projects • SH notification release 20-02 2022 Minimum Market Rent for Municipal Non- Profits (Section 95) • SH notification release 20-03 2022 Unit Rent Factors for Private Non-Profit Housing Corporations City of Hamilton Housing Services Division Community Services Department Brian Kreps Manager of Housing Programs • SH notification release 20-04 Cost Factors to Be Used in 2022 Fiscal Year Budgets for Private and Municipal Non-Profit Housing Corporations This information is also published in French and will be made available on the Ministry web site at: http://www.mah.gov.on.ca Individual Housing Provider Annual Subsidy Entitlements will be calculated using the above information and in conjunction with the City of Hamilton Annual Budget Process.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Mr. Doherty
    Descendants of Mr. Doherty Generation 1 1. MR.1 DOHERTY . He married MRS. DOHERTY. Mr. Doherty and Mrs. Doherty had the following children: 2. i. JAMES2 DOHERTY was born in 1797 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, CoTipperary, Ireland. He died on 08 Apr 1856 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Honora O'Donnell in 1834 in Clogheen, Tipperary, Ireland (Marriage of Jacob Doherty and Honora Donnell). She was born in 1811 in Co Tipperary, Ireland. She died on 05 Jan 1888 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. 3. ii. WILLIAM DOHERTY was born in 1799 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, CoTipperary, Ireland. He died on 10 Jun 1857 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Catherine Maxy on 16 Feb 1822 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, Tipperary, Ireland. She was born in Tipperary, Ireland. She died before 1847. Generation 2 2. JAMES2 DOHERTY (Mr.1) was born in 1797 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, CoTipperary, Ireland. He died on 08 Apr 1856 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Honora O'Donnell in 1834 in Clogheen, Tipperary, Ireland (Marriage of Jacob Doherty and Honora Donnell). She was born in 1811 in Co Tipperary, Ireland. She died on 05 Jan 1888 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. James Doherty and Honora O'Donnell had the following children: 4. i. PATRICK3 DOHERTY was born on 18 Mar 1835 in Ballywilliam, Ballyporeen Parish, Tipperary, Ireland. He died on 06 Sep 1904 in Asphodel Township, Peterborough County, Ontario, Canada. He married Bridget Sullivan, daughter of Michael Sullivan and Mary Allen, on 16 Feb 1857 in Douro, Ontario, Canada (Witnesses were William Doherty and Bridget Allen).
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: the Case of Chatham-Kent
    Western Public Health Casebooks Volume 2018 2018 Article 19 2018 Case 14 : Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The aC se of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner Western University Stanley Ing Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Laura Zettler Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit Gerald McKinley Western University Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/westernpublichealthcases Recommended Citation Turner, T., Ing, S., Zettler, L., McKinley, G. (2018). Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The asC e of Chatham-Kent. in: McKinley, G. & Sibbald, S.L. [eds] Western Public Health Casebook 2018. London, ON: Public Health Casebook Publishing. This Case is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western Public Health Casebooks by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health CASE 14 Rural Residence and Associated Health Disparities: The Case of Chatham-Kent Kate Turner, BSc, MPH (MPH Class of 2017) Stanley Ing, MPH, CPHI(c) (Epidemiologist, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Laura Zettler, MSc (Epidemiologist/Program Manager, Chatham-Kent Public Health Unit) Gerald McKinley, PhD (Assistant Professor, Western University) Today’s generation is likely the first to be less healthy and die sooner than their parents’ generation (Heart & Stroke, 2017). This statement should activate the critical and analytical parts of one’s thinking to ask: “Are certain populations more affected than others?”; “What are the social, ethical, medical, and economical implications?”; and ultimately; “Why?” To evaluate a population’s health requires an understanding of the population itself.
    [Show full text]
  • TO Supports Investement Fund Round 3 Recommended Allocations
    Appendix A TO Supports Funding for Social Service Agencies (Round Three) TO Supports Service Indigenous/Black Allocation Agency Name Ward Communities Being Served Priorities Catchment Agency Amount Food Access $ 1,671,000.00 Humber North York (Black Black Resilience Black Creek Community African (East and West), Caribbean and River-Black $ 60,000.00 Creek/Humber) Agency Health Centre Black communities Creek Indigenous people who are homeless, Dashmaawaan Etobicoke- vulnerable Indigenous seniors, families, City-wide Indigenous Agency Bemaadzinjin - They Feed $ 50,000.00 Lakeshore youth, mothers, fathers, community the People members. Humber York, Etobicoke, Black Resilience Black Creek Community African, Caribbean and Black low River-Black $ 100,000.00 and North York Agency Farm income Torontonians Creek City-wide; African, Caribbean and Black Black Resilience (emphasis in NE Afri-Can Food Basket York Centre $ 80,000.00 Torontonians who are in low income Agency and NW) households Undocumented Torontonians, low City-wide income families and individuals, (emphasis on NE FCJ Refugee Centre Davenport $ 99,000.00 survivors of human trafficking, and and NW) racialized newcomers West End Parkdale- Indigenous, Black and racialized Toronto, North Feed It Forward $ 95,000.00 High Park families, and vulnerable seniors West Toronto City-wide; Indigenous, Black and racialized York South- (emphasis in NE FoodShare $ 250,000.00 people, migrant workers, sex workers, Weston and NW) seniors, newcomers, and students. People who are homeless or precariously
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Soil Productivity: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading?
    Measuring Soil Productivity: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading? Nicole Rabe (Land Resource Specialist) Environmental Management Branch (OMAFRA) November 23, 2017 Agenda • Components of Soil Health • 4W’s of provincial soil map renewal initiatives • Precision ag data on farm & opportunities for site-specific soil health sampling & remediation • Summary Case Study: Linking soil health, mapping to crop productivity Soil Health Physical Chemical Biological Soil Function, Properties & Health Soil Compaction %OM Texture Flora and fauna Aggregate Macro/micro Stability PMN pH Mineral compounds Nutrient level Why are we renewing soil maps in Ontario? Making 21st Century decisions with mid-20th Century information Maps generated over 80 year period. Many have never had any updates or revision 5 Who is doing soil map renewal in Ontario? • Collaborative effort – AAFC (Xiaoyuan Geng) – U of G (Asim Biswas) – OMAFRA • Projects – Lake Erie watershed – Grand River watershed – GLASI Priority Sub-watersheds – Ottawa – Peterborough County • Techniques (using R): – cLHS – Optimization – Predictive modelling – Polygon disaggregation 6 Physical Where are we renewing soil maps in the near term? • Ottawa Urban Fringe • Peterborough County • Cochrane – Hearst • Temiskaming Shores 7 • GRCA • Greater Golden Horseshoe What were the legacy conventions of soil mapping? Clay Example: Soils of the Ottawa Area Loam Sand • Legacy maps were over designed for hard copy readability (e.g. Clay 1”=1mile) Shallow • Conventions were digitized and transcribed into GIS • Now found in an Clay interactive map viewer - Ag Info Atlas: Glacial Till ontario.ca/agmaps Drumlins 8 What are the current day technologies used in soil map Physical renewal? 2 yr LiDAR project • 3 planned capture areas ~ 30,000 sq km • leaf off: fall 2016 and spring 2017 • Open data • Detailed DEM products 9 OMAFRA Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) Projects • Ottawa Soil Survey Project Ottawa – Phase 1 – Urban Fringe: 855 sq.
    [Show full text]