DOCSLIB.ORG

Media Regulatory Authorities and Hate Speech and Hate Authorities Media Regulatory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

C M C M Y K Y K MEDIA REGULATORY CTP do B2 AUTHORITIES AND 011/242 2298 011/242 HATE SPEECH The aim of this publication is to contribute to a wider understanding of the concept of hate speech, to offer a starting point in terms of providing recommendations and mechanisms for ghting against and preventing it, and to facilitaterelating efforts and initiatives. It should represent a useful and important tool in further activities of not only media regulatory bodies,butalsoother societalstakeholders. The Council of Europe wishes to extend its gratitude to national regulatory authorities in the eld of electronic media from South-East Europe for their involvement, dedicated work, initiative, responsiveness and team-spirit that resulted in the creation of this very valuable publication. ENG MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AND HATE SPEECH AND HATE AUTHORITIES MEDIA REGULATORY The Council of Europe is the continent’s leading The European Union is a unique economic and political www.coe.int/en/web/freedom-expression human rights organisation. It comprises 47 member partnership between 28 democratic European countries. Its 300 g • 150 kom. • Sjajna 1/0 Plasfikacija: states, 28 of which are members of the European aims are peace, prosperity and freedom for its 500 million Union. All Council of Europe member states have citizens – in a fairer, safer world. To make things happen, EU signed up to the European Convention on Human countries set up bodies to run the EU and adopt its legislation. Rights, a treaty designed to protect human rights, The main ones are the European Parliament (representing the democracy and the rule of law. The European Court people of Europe), the Council of the European Union of Human Rights oversees the implementation of (representing national governments) and the European the Convention in the member states. Commission (representing the common EU interest). www.coe.int http://europa.eu C M C M Y K Y K REGIONAL PUBLICATION MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AND HATE SPEECH - The second edition - AUTHORS / EDITORS Asja Rokša Zubčevič Stanislav Bender Jadranka Vojvodić CONTRIBUTORS Emilija Petreska – Kamenjarova Milan Todorović Mirand Tafarshiku Monika Stafa The publication was prepared in June 2017 and reprinted in May 2018. English edition All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc.) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior permission in writing from the Directorate of Communications (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). This publication was produced with the financial assistance of the European Union and the Council of Europe. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinions of the European Union and the Council of Europe. Prepared and published within the scope of the Joint EU/CoE Programme “Reinforcing Judicial Expertise on Freedom of Expression and the Media in South-East Europe (JUFREX)” Print, layout and cover design Dosije studio, Belgrade Copyright©2017 Council of Europe Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 7 2. HATE SPEECH DISCOURSE 9 3. CASES OF HATE SPEECH IN THE REGION 21 Albania 21 Bosnia and Herzegovina 22 Croatia 39 Macedonian regulatory authority 45 Montenegro 60 Kosovo* 76 Serbia 77 4. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 84 ANNEX: Annex 1: Legal framework overviews of participating countries 95 Annex 2: Relevant case-law of the European Court of Human Rights 119 Audiovisual media and radio are powerful mediums. It is important that its power is exercised responsibly and a balance is struck between freedom of expression and fair and responsible journalism. Table of Contents Page 3 Acknowledgments The Council of Europe wishes to extend its gratitude to Albanian, Bosnian and Herzegovinian, Croatian, Kosovar,1 Montenegrin, Macedonian and Serbian national regulatory authorities in the field of electronic media for their involvement in producing this publication. Special recognition and gratitude goes to Asja Rokša – Zubčević, Stanislav Bender and Jadranka Vojvodić for their personal engagement in authoring large parts of this publication, and coordinating the entire process of production of this publication. Also, gratitude for their involvement is extended to other participants of national regulatory authorities: Emilija Petreska – Kamenjarova, Milan Todorović, Monika Stafa and Mirand Tafarshiku. Dedicated work, initiative, responsiveness and team-work are the characteristics of the crew working on this task which has, yet again, showed close and friendly relations among colleagues, and resulted in the creation of this very valuable publication. 1 Kosovo* – This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo Declaration of Independence. Acknowledgments Page 5 1. Introduction ithin the Council of Europe and the European Union project “Reinforcing Judicial Expertise on Freedom of Expression and W the Media in South-East Europe (JUFREX)”, the Regional conference “European standards and best practices in relation to hate speech and the protection of minors” was held on 7–8 July 2016, in Montenegro. With the aim of talking about important topics for all regulatory bodies, the conference promoted the regional cooperation in the fight against hate speech and the protection of minors from potentially inappropriate and harmful media content. Since the conference was the first gathering organised in the framework of the JUFREX project – it enabled the discussion about future cooperation and other activities related to the field of media regulation. The conference was attended by the representatives of Albanian, Bosnian and Herzegovinian, Croatian, Kosovar, Montenegrin, Macedonian, and Serbian regulatory bodies with guests from Croatia and Slovenia. The participants exchanged experiences related to regulation in this area and proposed to prepare a publication on hate speech that would contain information about significant cases that were dealt with by the regulators in the region. Also, it was agreed that one part of the publication should be devoted to the role of national regulatory authorities in this respect, including their legal and regulatory mandates. As suggested, these examples could serve as guidelines and recommendations for further action in similar cases. As this proposal was accepted by the JUFREX team, the meeting took place in early February of 2017 in Belgrade, where the representatives of national regulatory authorities discussed further steps, format, methodology and structure of the publication as well as overall coordination, division of tasks and contributions to be made by each regulatory authority. Accordingly, this publication has been prepared as a joint effort and endeavour of representatives of aforementioned national regulatory authorities, including those of Croatia, which is not a direct participant of this project, but its contributions are also very much valuable from the perspective of proximities of the region and similarity of languages. National regulatory authorities facilitated meaningful and thoughtful interaction through examination of an issue that requires collaborative action and exchanges of good practice. This publication is available in both electronic and print format, as well as in languages of all JUFREX countries. Within the framework of the JUFREX project, it will be shared with the representatives of national judicial branches. Furthermore, Introduction Page 7 it will be widely disseminated to various stakeholders including parliaments, academic institutions, self-regulatory bodies, journalists, etc. The aim of this publication is, among other things, to contribute to a wider understanding of the concept of hate speech, what it does and does not constitute, to offer a starting point in terms of providing recommendations and mechanisms for fighting against and preventing it, and to facilitate further efforts and initiatives. It should represent a useful and important tool in further activities of not only media regulatory bodies, but within the discourse of wider societal stakeholders. Page 8 Media regulatory authorities and hate speech 2. Hate speech discourse he right to freedom of expression is one of the most valuable human rights, guaranteed by various international conventions of human rights T and national constitutions. Such a right encompasses not only the right of everyone to disseminate different information and ideas (factual statements and value judgements), but also everyone’s right to receive information which others want to communicate to them (the so-called “right of the public to know”). The right of expression of thought is today an unavoidable political principle which is not theoretically questionable any more. It is one of the fundamental freedoms of man and citizen whose protection is ensured by international conventions and national legislations. Being an inherent and inalienable human right, it is a direct expression of human personality in a society and therefore it does not depend on the approval of state. At the same time, it is one of the fundamental rights of citizens, as there is no democracy without it. By ensuring the confrontation of opinions and presentation of different argumentation, it paves the way to fruitful syntheses which is a step forward on the way to social progress. Freedom of expression constitutes democracy, and where
Recommended publications
  • Report on Competitiveness “Natural-Born Clusters”

    Report on Competitiveness “Natural-Born Clusters”

    REPORT ON COMPETITIVENESS “NATURAL-BORN CLUSTERS” Pristina, 2014 REPORT ON COMPETITIVENESS “NATURAL-BORN CLUSTERS” Pristina, 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Financing provided by the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland in the framework of the Aid for Trade project. REPORT PREPARED BY: Cheng G. Ong – Author Supported by: Ilir Salihu and Paul Wittrock SPECIAL CONTRIBUTIONS PROVIDED BY: Ministry of Trade and Industry: The Cabinet of the Minister Department of Industry Department of Trade Kosovo Investment and Enterprise Support Agency UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME (UNDP) KOSOVO QUALITY ASSURANCE: TEUta PURRINI XHABALI, Project Manager, Aid for Trade ANita SmaiLOVIC, Project Associate, Aid for Trade ARtaNE RIZVANOLLI, External Consultant ERËBLINA ELEZAJ, Research Analyst, Policy, Research, Gender and Communication Team BURBUQE DOBRANJA, Communications Associate, Policy, Research, Gender and Communication Team DANIJELA MITIć, Communication Analyst, Policy, Research, Gender and Communication Team A special gratitude goes to all interviewed businesses and other relevant actors. _________________________________________________________________________________ There is no copyright on this document; therefore its content maybe be partially or fully used without the prior permission of UNDP. Its source, however, must be cited. The analysis and recommendations expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not represent the official position ofU nited Nations Development Programme and the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland. _________________________________________________________________________________
  • Contestation of Kosovo's Statehood from Within: EULEX Judges Adjudicating Privatization Matters Through 'Status Neutrality

    Contestation of Kosovo's Statehood from Within: EULEX Judges Adjudicating Privatization Matters Through 'Status Neutrality

    Review of Central and East European Law 45 (2020) 432-443 Contestation of Kosovo’s Statehood from Within: EULEX Judges Adjudicating Privatization Matters through ‘Status Neutrality’ Kushtrim Istrefi Assistant Professor of Human Rights Law and Public International Law, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Member of the Netherlands Institute of Human Rights and Utrecht Centre for Accountability and Liability Law, Utrecht, The Netherlands [email protected] Abstract Kosovo’s statehood has been contested by foes as well as friends. Much is known about the former and less about the latter. This contribution explores the contestation of Kosovo’s independence by the judges of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (eulex) working on privatization matters before Kosovo courts. As put by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kosovo (kcc), eulex judges working on privatization matters, “simply continued to ignore the existence of Kosovo as an independent State and its legislation emanating from its Assembly”. The kcc stated this after eulex judges working on privatization matters had refused to respect Kosovo laws and institutions subsequent to the 2008 Kosovo Declaration of Independence. This paper explores the judicial dialogue on Kosovo’s independence between eulex judges and the kcc and identifies the limitations and risks of the ‘status neutral’ policy applied by international organizations to collaborate with Kosovar institutions without prejudging its political status. This submission suggests that ‘status neutrality’ leads to either acceptance or contestation of Kosovo’s statehood and thus brings more uncertainty than clarity to Kosovo’s position in international relations. Keywords Kosovo – eulex – status-neutrality – contested statehood – international organizations © KUSHTRIM ISTREFI, 2020 | doi:10.1163/15730352-bja10036 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NCDownloaded 4.0 license.
  • Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition

    Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition

    COMMUNITY RIGHTS ASSESSMENT REPORT FOURTH EDITION NOVEMBER, 2015 Cover photograph: OSCE/Šehida Miftari, March 2015 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe MISSION IN KOSOVO Community Rights Assessment Report Fourth Edition November, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 5 1. INTER-COMMUNITY DIALOGUE ..................................................................................................... 6 Inter-ethnic dialogue and dealing with the past ................................................................................ 6 Education and dialogue ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. SECURITY AND JUSTICE SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 9 Security trends and responses ............................................................................................................ 9 Rule of Law ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Property rights and reduction of backlog ......................................................................................... 13 Access to Justice ..............................................................................................................................
  • Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008.Pdf

    Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008.Pdf

    Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Minoritenplatz 8 A-1014 Vienna Tel: During office hours on work days between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 0 50 11 50-0 / international: +43 50 11 50-0 or: (01) 90 115-0 / int.: (+43-1) 90 115-0 For general information: 0800 234 888 (toll free number, cannot be dialled from outside Austria) Fax: 0 50 11 59-0 / international: +43 50 11 59-0 or: (01) 904 20 16-0 / international: (+43-1) 904 20 16-0 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.bmeia.gv.at Citizens’ Help Desk In case of emergency abroad the Citizens’ Help Desk can be reached 24 hours a day: Tel: 0 50 11 50-4411 / international: +43 50 11 50-4411 or: (01) 90 115-4411 / international: +43 1 90 115-4411 Fax: 0 50 11 59-4411 / international: +43 50 11 59-4411 or: 0 50 11 59-245 / international: +43 50 11 59-245 or: (01) 904 20 16-245 / international: (+43-1) 904 20 16-245 E-Mail: [email protected] Assistance services available to Austrian citizens abroad are detailed on the homepage of the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs at www.bmeia.gv.at under “Service”.  Austrian Foreign Policy Yearbook 2008 Report by the Federal Minister for European and International Affairs  Proprietor and Publisher: Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs A-1014 Vienna, Minoritenplatz 8 Austria Edited and Coordinated by: Thomas Schlesinger Christoph Weidinger Clemens Geelhaar Monika Lemmerer English translation coordinated by: Sabine Hübler Printed by: Manz Crossmedia GmbH & Co KG A-1051 Vienna, Stolberggasse 26 Austria The original German version is available at: www.bmeia.gv.at, or in printed form in the Information Management, Documentation, Knowledge Management Department at the Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Preface In 2008, the international community faced a number of very special challenges, ranging from the global economic crisis and the problems of the European energy supply at the beginning of the year to the conflicts in Georgia and Gaza.
  • KFOS LOCAL and INTERNATIONAL VOLUME II.Pdf

    KFOS LOCAL and INTERNATIONAL VOLUME II.Pdf

    EDITED BY IOANNIS ARMAKOLAS AGON DEMJAHA LOCAL AND AROLDA ELBASANI STEPHANIE SCHWANDNER- SIEVERS INTERNATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF KOSOVO’S STATEHOOD VOLUME II LOCAL AND INTERNATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF KOSOVO’S STATEHOOD —VOLUME II EDITED BY: IOANNIS ARMAKOLAS AGON DEMJAHA AROLDA ELBASANI STEPHANIE SCHWANDNER-SIEVERS Copyright ©2021 Kosovo Foundation for Open Society. All rights reserved. PUBLISHER: Kosovo Foundation for Open Society Imzot Nikë Prelaj, Vila 13, 10000, Prishtina, Kosovo. Issued in print and electronic formats. “Local and International Determinants of Kosovo’s Statehood: Volume II” EDITORS: Ioannis Armakolas Agon Demjaha Arolda Elbasani Stephanie Schwandner-Sievers PROGRAM COORDINATOR: Lura Limani Designed by Envinion, printed by Envinion, on recycled paper in Prishtina, Kosovo. ISBN 978-9951-503-06-8 CONTENTS ABOUT THE EDITORS 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 12 INTRODUCTION 13 CULTURE, HERITAGE AND REPRESENTATIONS 31 — Luke Bacigalupo Kosovo and Serbia’s National Museums: A New Approach to History? 33 — Donjetë Murati and Stephanie Schwandner- Sievers An Exercise in Legitimacy: Kosovo’s Participation at 1 the Venice Biennale 71 — Juan Manuel Montoro Imaginaries and Media Consumptions of Otherness in Kosovo: Memories of the Spanish Civil War, Latin American Telenovelas and Spanish Football 109 — Julianne Funk Lived Religious Perspectives from Kosovo’s Orthodox Monasteries: A Needs Approach for Inclusive Dialogue 145 LOCAL INTERPRETATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL RULES 183 — Meris Musanovic The Specialist Chambers in Kosovo: A Hybrid Court between
  • Hotel Industry Development in Kosovo Kaltrina Zeka Kxz2865@Rit.Edu

    Hotel Industry Development in Kosovo Kaltrina Zeka [email protected]

    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses Thesis/Dissertation Collections 7-2018 Hotel Industry Development in Kosovo Kaltrina Zeka [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Zeka, Kaltrina, "Hotel Industry Development in Kosovo" (2018). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Senior Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hotel Industry Development in Kosovo Honors Project Kaltrina Zeka July 2018 Advisor: Venera Demukaj 1 Acknowledgments I am thankful to: My parents who are the main reason of my achievements, my success and the fact that I find it hard to compress my CV in two pages: My father and mentor of this senior project who is my main guide in business, in exploiting opportunities, and driving carefully. My mother who is the person that always made the situation and environment for me to do what I thought of, and worked on. My sisters and brother who are my main supporters, greatest friends and secret holders, and my biggest borrowers. My supervisor who is the most committed supervisor, and the person who relaxed from the part of my presentation when I said do you have any questions. My friends who are the main reason I laughed before exams, and after… My professors who explored my capacities, exploded them and made sure I didn’t pass deadlines.
  • Cßr£ S1ÍU2Y M Life ;-I;

    Cßr£ S1ÍU2Y M Life ;-I;

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Bilkent University Institutional Repository p fr-; C ß R £ S1ÍU2Y lifem ; - i ; : : ... _ ...._ _ .... • Ûfc 1î A mm V . W-. V W - W - W__ - W . • i.r- / ■ m . m . ,l.m . İr'4 k W « - Xi û V T k € t> \5 0 Q I3 f? 3 -;-rv, 'CC/f • ww--wW- ; -w W “V YUGOSLAVIA: A CASE STUDY IN CONFLICT AND DISINTEGRATION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE INSTITUTE OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES BILKENT UNIVERSITY MEVLUT KATIK i ' In Partial Fulfillment iff the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts February 1994 /at jf-'t. "•* 13 <5 ' K İ8 133(, £>02216$ Approved by the Institute of Economics and Socjal Sciences I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate,in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Prof.Dr.Ali Karaosmanoglu I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. A j ua. Asst.Prof. Dr. Nur Bilge Criss I certify that I have read this thesis and in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in International Relations. Asst.Prof.Dr.Ali Fuat Borovali ÖZET Eski Yugoslavya buğun uluslararasi politikanin odak noktalarindan biri haline gelmiştir.
  • The Kosovo Protection Corps. a Critical Study of Its De

    The Kosovo Protection Corps. a Critical Study of Its De

    The Kosovo Protection Corps A Critical Study of its De-activation as a Transition Ade Clewlow Department of Security and Conflict Management Affairs International of Institute Norwegian Security in Practice 4 · 2010 [NUPI Report] Publisher: The Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Copyright: © Norwegian Institute of International Affairs 2010 ISBN: 978-82-7002-273-1 Any views expressed in this publication are those of the author. They should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. The text may not be printed in part or in full without the permission of the author. Visiting address: C.J. Hambros plass 2 d Address: P.O. Box 8159 Dep. 0033 Oslo Norway Internet: www.nupi.no E-mail: [email protected] Fax: [+ 47] 22 36 21 82 Tel: [+ 47] 22 99 40 00 The Kosovo Protection Corps A Critical Study of its De-activation as a Transition Ade Clewlow Lieutenant Colonel, MBE, Former KFOR Liaison Officer to the KPC The final KPC parade before De-Activation This report is part of the Norwegian engagement in the Multinational Experiment 6 (MNE-6). The project is financed by the Norwegian Ministry of Defence and is managed by the Innovation, Network Capabilities and Information Infrastructure Command (INI). Besides NUPI, the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI) and the Defence Staff College are also engaged in the programme. Further information can be found at: http://mne.oslo.mil.no Context This paper has been written from a practitioner’s perspective. The author spent 6 months embedded with the Kosovo Protection Corps (KPC) command team, spending hours in their company during its de-activation.
  • Kosovo: Background and U.S

    Kosovo: Background and U.S

    Kosovo: Background and U.S. Policy Updated March 11, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46175 SUMMARY R46175 Kosovo: Background and U.S. Policy March 11, 2021 Kosovo, a country in the Western Balkans with a predominantly Albanian-speaking population, declared independence from Serbia in 2008, less than a decade after a brief but lethal war. It has Sarah E. Garding since been recognized by about 100 countries. The United States and most European Union (EU) Analyst in European Affairs member states recognize Kosovo. Serbia, Russia, China, and various other countries (including five EU member states) do not. Key issues for Kosovo include the following: New Leadership. Albin Kurti is poised to become prime minister for the second time after his left-leaning Self-Determination Party (Vetëvendosje) won a landslide victory in early parliamentary elections in February 2021. The poll was Kosovo’s second snap parliamentary election in less than two years. Once of the new parliament’s initial responsibilities is to elect the country’s next president. Acting President Vjosa Osmani, whose candidacy is backed by Vetëvendosje, is heavily favored to win. Parliament’s failure to elect a president could trigger early parliamentary elections, however. Dialogue with Serbia. The unresolved dispute between Kosovo and Serbia is one of the main threats to regional stability in the Western Balkans. Since 2011, the EU has facilitated a dialogue aimed at normalizing their relations. In July 2020, Kosovo and Serbia returned to EU-led talks after a 20-month suspension. Shortly thereafter, the two parties agreed to new measures on economic cooperation at talks hosted by the White House.
  • Report of the Consultative Visit in Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Report of the Consultative Visit in Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Strasbourg, 29 May 2012 EPAS (2012) 26 ENLARGED PARTIAL AGREEMENT ON SPORT (EPAS) Report of the Consultative visit in Bosnia and Herzegovina on the European Sports Charter, as well as the implementation of the Recommendation Rec(2001)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the prevention of racism, xenophobia and racial intolerance in sport EPAS (2012) 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Auto-evaluation reports by the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina Overview of the organisation and state structures Report on European Sport Charter Report on Rec (2001) 6 B. Report of the evaluation team C. Comments from Bosnia and Herzegovina Appendices: Final programme The Law on Sport in Bosnia and Herzegovina EPAS (2012) 26 A. Auto-evaluation reports by the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA MINISTRY OF CIVIL AFFAIRS Summary Report Overview of sports organizations and state structures Sarajevo, October 2010 1. INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE 1.1. The Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina – The Ministry of Civil Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina The BiH Sports Law regulates the sport in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the public interest and objectives of the competence of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republic of Srpska and the Federation of BiH and the Brčko District of BiH and other levels of the administrative organization. The Sports Department operates within the Ministry and was established on 1 January 2009. The responsibilities of the Sports Department are defined by Article 60 of the BiH Sports Law ("Official Gazette of
  • SUBKULTURESUBKULTURE Prispevki Za Kritiko in Analizo Družbenih Gibanj XII

    SUBKULTURESUBKULTURE Prispevki Za Kritiko in Analizo Družbenih Gibanj XII

    SUBKULTURESUBKULTURE prispevki za kritiko in analizo družbenih gibanj XII. SUBKULTURNI AZIL MARIBOR, 2013 Frontier 073 Zbornik SUBKULTURE: prispevki za kritiko in analizo družbenih gibanj, XII. št. Tematska izdaja: Socializacija in socialne formacije © Subkulturni azil, zavod za umetniško produkcijo in založništvo, 2013 Vse pravice pridržane. Nobenega dela te knjige ni dovoljeno ponatisniti, reproducirati ali posredovati s kakršnimikoli sredstvi, elektronskimi, mehanskimi, s fotokopiranjem, zvokovnim snemanjem ali kako drugače, brez poprejšnjega pisnega dovoljenja založbe Subkulturni azil. Uredil: dr. Andrej Naterer Odgovorna urednica: Tatjana-Tanja Cvitko Lektorirala: Nina Klaučič Recenzenta: doc. dr. Marina Tavčar Krajnc, doc. dr. Smiljana Gartner Oblikovanje ovitka: Zlatko Kuret Oblikovanje in prelom: PDesign, Peter Dobaj s.p. Izdal: Subkulturni azil, zavod za umetniško produkcijo in založništvo, Maribor http://www.ljudmila.org/subkulturni-azil Za založbo: Branko Hedl Tisk: Ale d.o.o., Postojna Naklada: 500 izvodov Izid knjige so podprli: Javna agencija za knjigo Republike Slovenije Mestna občina Maribor Dravske elektrarne Maribor Notesniki.si CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Univerzitetna knjižnica Maribor 316.723 SOCIALIZACIJA in socialne formacije / [uredil Andrej Naterer]. - Maribor : Subkulturni azil, zavod za umetniško produkcijo in založništvo, 2013. - (Knjižna zbirka Frontier ; 073) (Subkulture : prispevki za kritiko in analizo družbenih gibanj. Tematska izdaja ; št. 12) ISBN 978-961-6620-40-6 1. Naterer, Andrej COBISS.SI-ID
  • The Effects of Nationalism on Territorial Integrity Among Armenians and Serbs Nina Patelic

    The Effects of Nationalism on Territorial Integrity Among Armenians and Serbs Nina Patelic

    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2008 The Effects of Nationalism on Territorial Integrity Among Armenians and Serbs Nina Patelic Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THE EFFECTS OF NATIONALISM ON TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AMONG ARMENIANS AND SERBS By Nina Patelic A Thesis submitted to the Department of International Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2008 The members of the Committee approve the thesis of Nina Pantelic, defended on September 28th, 2007. ------------------------------- Jonathan Grant Professor Directing Thesis ------------------------------- Peter Garretson Committee Member ------------------------------- Mark Souva Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii ACKOWLEDGEMENTS This paper could not have been written without the academic insight of my thesis committee members, as well as Dr. Kotchikian. I would also like to thank my parents Dr. Svetlana Adamovic and Dr. Predrag Pantelic, my grandfather Dr. Ljubisa Adamovic, my sister Ana Pantelic, and my best friend, Jason Wiggins, who have all supported me over the years. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………..v INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………….1 1. NATIONALISM, AND HOW IT DEVELOPED IN SERBIA AND ARMENIA...6 2. THE CONFLICT OVER KOSOVO AND METOHIJA…………………………...27 3. THE CONFLICT OVER NAGORNO KARABAKH……………………………..56 CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………...……….89 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………93 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH………………………………………………………….101 iv ABSTRACT Nationalism has been a driving force in both nation building and in spurring high levels of violence. As nations have become the norm in modern day society, nationalism has become detrimental to international law, which protects the powers of sovereignty.