Ministry of Forests Vancouver Forest Region 2 100 Labieux Road Nanaimo, B.C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ministry of Forests Vancouver Forest Region 2 100 Labieux Road Nanaimo, B.C Golder Associates ltd. 500 4260 Sell Creek Drive Burnaby, British Columbia. Canada V5C 6C6 Telephone (604) 298.6623 FOX (604]298-5253 REPORT ON AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW OF THE CENTRAL COAST LRMP AREA Submitted to: Ministry of Forests Vancouver Forest Region 2 100 Labieux Road Nanaimo, B.C. V9T 6E9 Submitted by: Golder Associates Ltd. 500 - 4260 Still Creek Drive Burnaby, B.C. v5c 6C6 HERITAGE RESOURCE CENTRE MIkISTRY OF SMALI.. BUSINESS, ?0L~R1Siv~ ANCj l;Ui.TURE 101 8C0 :&!NSON STREET BOX 9821, STN PROV GOVT ‘.‘1cr0RIA SC \‘8W 9w3 DISTRIBUTION: 4 Copies - Vancouver Forest Region, Ministry of Forests, Nanaimo, B.C. 1 copy: Phil Hobler, Simon Fraser University, Bumaby, B.C. 1 copy- Archaeology Branch, Victoria, B.C. 2 Copies - Golder Associates Ltd., Bumaby, B.C. June 1999 962-1936 June 1,1999 -i- 962-1936 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report describes the results of an archaeological overview assessment (AOA) of the Central Coast Land and Resource Management Plan (LRMP) area. The study was undertaken on behalf of the Ministry of Forests (Vancouver Forest Region). The objectives of the study were to summarize and evaluate existing information about cultural heritage resources in the study area and to develop a series of predictive models to help assess the need for archaeological investigation (impact assessments or reconnaissance) prior to land development. The project involved four main phases: (1) background research, including a review of previous archaeological, historical, and ethnographic reports and publications; (2) development of models to predict where archaeological sites are most likely to be found; (3) implementation of the models to assess the archaeological site potential of the Central Coast; and (4) recommendations for appropriate cultural resource management strategies for the LRMP area. The project is GIS-based, providing a mapped representation of areas of potential archaeological concern that can be viewed or plotted at various scales. Information derived from the study will help the Ministry of Forests and other govermnent agencies, including First Nations, to integrate archaeological resource management with other land use planning decisions so that heritage sites may be preserved or managed according to the British Columbia Heritage Conservation Act, the Forest Practices Code Act, and other relevant legislation and protocol agreements. Predictive models were developed according to archaeological site type. Models were created for coastal and inland habitation sites, culturally modified trees (CMTs), subalpine camps, trails, pictographs, and petroglyphs. Modelling involved dividing the entire study area into 25 metre grids and predicting the archaeological site potential of each grid cell, based on a series of rules. Model results were tested by evaluating the degree to which they correctly predicted the locations of recorded archaeological sites. No field testing has been undertaken to date. Based on the analysis of recorded site capture. the most successful first-generation models were the inland habitation and petroglyph models, for which 88% and 73% of recorded sites (buffered by 100 metres) were fell within areas predicted to have high or moderate archaeological site potential. First-generation model results for coastal habitations, cuIturally modified trees, trails and 4 June 1,1999 _ ii _ 962-1936 pictographs did not perform well. It was determined that the available data were inadequate for successfully modelling pictographs or trails. The pictograph model was abandoned, and the trails model results should be considered very preliminary. No management decisions should be made solely on fhe basis of these two models. No subalpine sites have been recorded in the study area to date, so the subalpine camp model could not be evaluated. The coastal habitation and CMT models were revised, incorporating additional and improved baseline data, and the models were re-run. The second-generation model results showed marked improvement, with 96% of recorded coastal habitation sites and 99.5% of recorded CMT sites falling within areas predicted to have high or moderate site potential. Sixty-four percent of recorded CMT sites were correctly predicted by the CMT model, while the remaining 35.5% were encompassed by the coastal habitation model results. The models classified all lands according to a tripartite scheme, in which Class I lands are predicted to have the greatest archaeological potential and Class III lands the lowest. Site potential can also be viewed as relative predicted site density, in which the highest density and greatest variation of sites equates with highest site potential. Given the severe terrain of much of the Central Coast, it was expected that moderate to high site potential ratings would cover a relatively small portion of the study area land mass. The models predict that 3.1% of the study area (147,440 hectares) falls within fhe Class I category (highest site potential), while 16.7% (808,068 hectares) fall within Class II lands. This suggests that the vast majority of archaeological sites in the Central Coast LW area will occur in less than 20% of the land mass. A significant portion of fhis area is designated Class II for CMTs only or for subalpine campsites. Additional field data may reduce the area encompassed by these models. The model results can be used as a risk index to guide future cultural resource management efforts. It is recommended that archaeological impact assessments be undertaken in all Class I lands (highest risk areas) prior to any land-altering developments, except where only CMT potential is predicted. In those areas, a preliminary field reconnaissance (PFR) is recommended. For Class II lands, including those predicted to have only CMT potential, a PFR is recommended. A PFR may be adequate to assess Class II areas, or field observations may indicate that a more detailed June 1, 1999 - 111 - 962-1936 impact assessment is warranted. No archaeological fieldwork is recommended for Class III lands, although it is cautioned that occasional sites may be present in those areas. Consistent with Section 51 of the Forest Pvuctices Code, if an archaeological site is encountered during development, it is recommended that all land-altering activity in the immediate vicinity of the site until the Archaeology Branch and local First Nations are contacted to develop a site management plan. The report also presents a number of more general recommendations relating to the AOA and future refinements to the models. P-IA.... .__--,-a-_ June 1,1999 - iv - 962-1936 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge and sincerely thank the First Nations of the Central Coast for sharing their knowledge about the study area and for providing comments regarding the content of the report. We are also grateful to Sharon Hadway of the Ministry of Forests and Doug Glaum of the Archaeology Branch for their help in co- ordinating the project. The following people are acknowledged for their attendance and participation in Steering Committee meetings: Maxine Bruce, Kwakiutl Territorial Fisheries Commission Jennifer Carpenter, Heiltsuk Cultural Education Centre Mervin Child, Musgamagw Tsawataineuk Tribal Council Norman Dale, Oweekeno Kitasoo Nuxalk Tribal Council Doug Glaum, Archaeology Branch, Ministry of Small Business, Tourism and Culture Sharon Hadway, Vancouver Forest Region John Sunde, Vancouver Forest Region Scott Harris, Kwakiutl District Council Philip Hobler, Simon Fraser University Mary-Pat Mathers, Campbell River Forest District Tad McIlwraith, Traditions Consulting (on behalf of the Oweekeno First Nation) Mark McIntyre, Port McNeil1 Forest District Ross Neasloss, Kitasoo First Nation Karen Reese, Kwakiutl Territorial Fisheries Commission Korene Riley and Wilma Robinson, Mid-Coast Forest District Dago Walkus, Oweekeno First Nation We would also like to thank Barb Rimmer and Pradeep Singh of the Archaeology Branch and Romi Casper of the Culture Library for providing archaeological reports, site forms and GIS data. We are indebted to Professor Phil Hobler of Simon Fraser University for sharing his knowledge about the archaeology of the Central Coast. c June 1,1999 -v- 962-1936 CREDITS Project Director Jeff Bailey, M.A. Report Authors Jeff Bailey Erika Laanela, B.A. Tanja Hoffmann, B.A. Gail Wada, B.A., Dipl. Tech. Shauna McRanor, B.A. Monica Karpiak, B.A. Steve Horvath, B.A. GIS Analysis and Modelling Jeff Bailey Kevin McCreight, B.Sc. Jill Hebb, B.Sc., Dip GIS Kevin Seel, M.Sc. Andrew Mason, M.A. Justin McPherson, B.E.S. Andrew Harries, B.Sc. Jason Shaw, B.Sc. Carrie Anderson, B.A. Fiona Gregory, B.Sc., Cert. GIS Michael Kartusch, B.A., Dip. GIS Matt Millard, B.A. Colin Bakermans, B.Sc Doug Comery, M.Sc. Research Erika Laanela Jeff Bailey Gail Wada Robert Diaz, M.A.’ Research Advisor Philip M. Hobler, M.A? Archaeological Data Review Shauna McRanor Erika Laanela I Technical Review Rebecca Balcom, M.A. Principal, Golder Associates Ltd. ’ Traditions Consulting 2 Simon Fraser University June I,1999 -vi- 962-1936 TABLE OF CONTENTS Management Summary i Acknowledgements iv Credits V Table of Contents vi List of Tables X List of Figures xi List of Photographs xii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 The Land Resource Management Plan (LRMP) Process ........................ .2 1.2 The Archaeological Overview Assessment (AOA) Process.. .................. .2 1.2.1 Phase One: Data Collection and Review.. .................................
Recommended publications
  • A Salmon Monitoring & Stewardship Framework for British Columbia's Central Coast
    A Salmon Monitoring & Stewardship Framework for British Columbia’s Central Coast REPORT · 2021 citation Atlas, W. I., K. Connors, L. Honka, J. Moody, C. N. Service, V. Brown, M .Reid, J. Slade, K. McGivney, R. Nelson, S. Hutchings, L. Greba, I. Douglas, R. Chapple, C. Whitney, H. Hammer, C. Willis, and S. Davies. (2021). A Salmon Monitoring & Stewardship Framework for British Columbia’s Central Coast. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Pacific Salmon Foundation. authors Will Atlas, Katrina Connors, Jason Slade Rich Chapple, Charlotte Whitney Leah Honka Wuikinuxv Fisheries Program Central Coast Indigenous Resource Alliance Salmon Watersheds Program, Wuikinuxv Village, BC Campbell River, BC Pacific Salmon Foundation Vancouver, BC Kate McGivney Haakon Hammer, Chris Willis North Coast Stock Assessment, Snootli Hatchery, Jason Moody Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Nuxalk Fisheries Program Bella Coola, BC Bella Coola, BC Bella Coola, BC Stan Hutchings, Ralph Nelson Shaun Davies Vernon Brown, Larry Greba, Salmon Charter Patrol Services, North Coast Stock Assessment, Christina Service Fisheries and Oceans Canada Fisheries and Oceans Canada Kitasoo / Xai’xais Stewardship Authority BC Prince Rupert, BC Klemtu, BC Ian Douglas Mike Reid Salmonid Enhancement Program, Heiltsuk Integrated Resource Fisheries and Oceans Canada Management Department Bella Coola, BC Bella Bella, BC published by Pacific Salmon Foundation 300 – 1682 West 7th Avenue Vancouver, BC, V6J 4S6, Canada www.salmonwatersheds.ca A Salmon Monitoring & Stewardship Framework for British Columbia’s Central Coast REPORT 2021 Acknowledgements We thank everyone who has been a part of this collaborative Front cover photograph effort to develop a salmon monitoring and stewardship and photograph on pages 4–5 framework for the Central Coast of British Columbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildfire Consultation Report Appendix.Pdf
    Appendix Appendix Contents 50 Issues / Gaps - Partner Agencies 54 Statistics from Emergency Operations 54 Public Information (Communications) 61 EOC Activation Levels & Orders/Alerts Issued 71 Presentation and Interview with Robert Gray, Fire Ecologist 72 Climate Maps from Environment Canada 72 Documentaries & Interviews Reviewed 73 Cariboo Regional District Population Statistics 76 Consultation Meeting Overview 79 Top Five Topics by Meeting Location based on number of recorded comments Meeting Profiles: 81 100 Mile House 83 108 Mile Ranch 85 150 Mile House 87 Alexis Creek 89 Anahim Lake 91 Big Lake 93 Forest Grove 95 Horsefly 97 Interlakes 99 Kersley 101 Lac la Hache 103 Likely 105 McLeese Lake 107 Miocene 109 Nazko 113 Nimpo Lake 115 Quesnel 117 Riske Creek 119 Tatla Lake 121 Watch Lake 123 Wells 125 West Fraser 127 Wildwood 129 Williams Lake 131 Facebook Live 133 Comments from All Consultations By community meeting: 133 100 Mile House 136 108 Mile Ranch 144 150 Mile House 148 Alexis Creek 150 Anahim Lake 152 Big Lake 156 Forest Grove 159 Horsefly 161 Interlakes 167 Kersley 167 Lac la Hache 170 Likely 172 McLeese Lake 173 Miocene 177 Nazko 183 Nimpo Lake 186 Quesnel 189 Riske Creek 193 Tatla Lake 196 Watch Lake 199 Wells 200 West Fraser 203 Wildwood 206 Williams Lake 215 Facebook Live / Recording 218 Received Emails, Calls, and Facebook Messages/Comments 234 Survey Results 300 Information from Other Sources 301 Cellular Coverage Maps 302 Weather Forecasts - July 6 and 7 306 Seasonal Weather Forecast 317 Ranks of Fires 319 Canadian Wildland Fire Information System 321 Cariboo Fire Centre Prep July 6-7 326 Post-Wildfire Hazard Risk Assessment - C10784 Plateau 332 Alberta Wildfire Trend 334 Samples of Evacuation Communications 343 Community Descriptions 350 Glossary 351 Additional Citations Issues / Gaps - Partner Agencies Issues and gaps which are generally outside the jurisdiction of the Cariboo Regional District, along with suggested solutions (where applicable).
    [Show full text]
  • Uvic Thesis Template
    Coastal aquaculture in British Columbia: Perspectives on finfish, shellfish, seaweed and Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) from three First Nation communities by Kathryn Tebbutt B.A., University of British Columbia, 2009 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Geography Kathryn Tebbutt, 2014 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Coastal aquaculture in British Columbia: Perspectives on finfish, shellfish, seaweed and Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA) from three First Nation communities by Kathryn Tebbutt B.A., University of British Columbia, 2009 Supervisory Committee Dr. Mark Flaherty, (Department of Geography) Supervisor Dr. Denise Cloutier, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Stephen Cross, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. Mark Flaherty, (Department of Geography) Supervisor Dr. Denise Cloutier, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Dr. Stephen Cross, (Department of Geography) Departmental Member Most aquaculture tenures in British Columbia (BC) are located in coastal First Nation traditional territories, making the aquaculture industry very important to First Nation communities. Marine aquaculture, in particular salmon farming, has been labeled one of the most controversial industries in BC and various groups with differing opinions have created a wide-spread media debate known as the “aquaculture controversy”. Industry, government, and (E)NGO’s are often the most visible players; First Nations, especially those without aquaculture operations directly in their territories, are often excluded or underrepresented in the conversation.
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Regional Guide Cat
    National Marine Weather Guide British Columbia Regional Guide Cat. No. En56-240/3-2015E-PDF 978-1-100-25953-6 Terms of Usage Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; • Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) or 819-997-2800 or email to [email protected]. Disclaimer: Her Majesty is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in the reproduced material. Her Majesty shall at all times be indemnified and held harmless against any and all claims whatsoever arising out of negligence or other fault in the use of the information contained in this publication or product. Photo credits Cover Left: Chris Gibbons Cover Center: Chris Gibbons Cover Right: Ed Goski Page I: Ed Goski Page II: top left - Chris Gibbons, top right - Matt MacDonald, bottom - André Besson Page VI: Chris Gibbons Page 1: Chris Gibbons Page 5: Lisa West Page 8: Matt MacDonald Page 13: André Besson Page 15: Chris Gibbons Page 42: Lisa West Page 49: Chris Gibbons Page 119: Lisa West Page 138: Matt MacDonald Page 142: Matt MacDonald Acknowledgments Without the works of Owen Lange, this chapter would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Lode-Goijd Deposits
    BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES HON. E. C. CARSON, Minisfer JOHN F. WALKER, Deputy Minister . BULLETIN NO. 20-PART 11. LODE-GOIJD DEPOSITS South-eastern British Columbia by W.H. MATHEWS PREFACE. Bulletin 20, designed for the use of thoseinterested in the discovery of gold- bearing lode deposits, is being published as a series of separate parts. Part I. is to contain information about lode-gold production in British Columbia as awhole, and will be accompanied by a map on which the generalized geology of the Province is rep- resented. The approximate total production of each lode-gold mining centre, exclusive of by-product gold, is also indicated on the map. Each of the other parts deals with a , major subdivision of the Province, giving information about the geology, gold-bearing lode deposits, and lode-gold production of areas within the particular subdivision. In all, seven parts are proposed:- PARTI.-General re Lode-gold Production in British Columbia. PART11.-South-eastern Britis:h Columbia. ’ PART111.-Central Southern British Columbia. PART1V.-South-western British Columbia, exclusive of Vancouver Island, PARTV.-Vancouver Island. PARTVI.-North-eastern British Columbia, including the Cariboo and Hobson Creek Areas. PARTVI1.-North-western British Columbia. Bykind permission of Professor H. C. Gunning,Department ofGeology, Uni- versity of British Columbia, his compilation of the geology of British Columbia has been follo-wed in the generalized geology represented on the map accompanying Part I. Professor Gunning’s map was published in “The Miner,” Vancouver, B.C., June-July, 1943, and in “The Northern Miner,” Toronto, Ont., December 16th, 1943.
    [Show full text]
  • Order in Council 462/1919
    462 Approved and ordered this day of Lleutenant.Governor. At the Executive Council Chamber, Victoria, PRESENT: The Honourable c)- Mr.Ulivar in the Chair. Mr.B tall° Mr.liacLe tut Mr.2ar ri 8 Mr.klar t Mr.Bur row Mr.310 an Mr.1.: inc To His Honour The Lieutenant-Governor in Council: The undersigned has the honour to 7HAT Section 5 of Chapter 17 of the Statutes of 1912, provides for the Division of tne Province into Forest Districts; AID to recommend that Districts be established in accordance with the Schedule attoched hereto. DATED THIS 1' A.D. 1919. 1-.ioter of Lands. l".7] /4 DAY OF a L.D. 1919. 2ToL-Aain:: :.ember of the ILIxecutive Coun-::. ( DESCRInTIO1:S OF 70nEJTET DISTnICTS. NELSONFOE:2TRY DISTRICT: Commencing It a'point on tne International Boundary line being the S.E. corner of Section 4, Township b6, Osoyoos now Similkameen Division of Yale District; thence due North to the Coutherly boundary of the waterehne cf ..lanen Creek; thence Northerly following the .lesterly boundary of the watershed of LIM:annoy Creek and Kettle :aver and its tributaries to point whore such boundary intersects the nestorly boundary of the Kootenay Land District. Thence Northerly along the said nestern boundary of Kootenay Land District to the South boundary of the Dominion Government railway -.3elt. Thence Easterly along the Southerly boundary of said Railway Belt to the Eastern boundary of the watershed of Duncan River. Thence Southerly along the height of land between the miters flowing the Kootenay Lake to the West and the Columbia and Kootenay Rivers to the East to a point due East of Kuskanook; thence Jesterly to the South-west corner of Sub-lot'145 of Lot 4595, L:ootenay District.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 'Namgis First Nation Council Meeting March 3, 2016 9:30Am
    ‘Namgis First Nation Council Meeting March 3, 2016 9:30am Council Chambers Council: Chief Debra Hanuse; Councillors Sharon Gordon; Kelly Speck; Robert Mountain; Steven Smith Bill Wasden (1pm) Staff: Administrator Hopeton Louden; Assistant Administrator Verna Ambers; Record Keeper Gina Wadhams Open Meeting 9:30am Agenda MOTION #2474: SHARON GORDON/STEVEN SMITH That the agenda be accepted with amendments/addition of ‘Tides of Change’. CARRIED Minutes TABLED until afternoon Council minutes to be together for Debra Hanuse to sign for auditors. A ‘true copy’ – with all corrections/amendments Decision in the past to compile all Council minutes in a binder – all stored in a central place for Council to read through. Minutes are missing – need access to computer with minutes file. Systems Administrator can access all work stations. Minutes/Website Question on why approved minutes are not posted to website. Administration will review and ensure that this happens. Gina Wadhams will ensure the minutes are on website FA #18 AANDC AANDC Amendment #0018 2015/2016 Fiscal Year TEFA $10,141.00. Instructional Services Formula for Low Enrolment MOTION #2475: KELLY SPECK/STEVEN SMITH Approve the signing of AANDC Amendment #0018 2016/2016 Fiscal Year TEFA. CARRIED Amendments #9-17 have been misplaced. These will be needed for audit. Health Centre Policy binder distributed to Council. Council requires a briefing note on the policies. Policies Concern with this coming to Council now with a request for approval by March 31, 2016 with Procedures no background information. Accreditation Request briefing note from Georgia Cook. BY CONSENSUS: That Committee reports and recommendations come to Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Prehistoric Cultural Horizons on the Canadian Plateau
    LATE PREHISTORIC CULTURAL HORIZONS ON THE CANADIAN PLATEAU Department of Archaeology Thomas H. Richards Simon Fraser University Michael K. Rousseau Publication Number 16 1987 Archaeology Press Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C. PUBLICATIONS COMMITTEE Roy L. Carlson (Chairman) Knut R. Fladmark Brian Hayden Philip M. Hobler Jack D. Nance Erie Nelson All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ISBN 0-86491-077-0 PRINTED IN CANADA The Department of Archaeology publishes papers and monographs which relate to its teaching and research interests. Communications concerning publications should be directed to the Chairman of the Publications Committee. © Copyright 1987 Department of Archaeology Simon Fraser University Late Prehistoric Cultural Horizons on the Canadian Plateau by Thomas H. Richards and Michael K. Rousseau Department of Archaeology Simon Fraser University Publication Number 16 1987 Burnaby, British Columbia We respectfully dedicate this volume to the memory of CHARLES E. BORDEN (1905-1978) the father of British Columbia archaeology. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................................vii List of Figures.....................................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Star Ratings and CCRPI Scores.Xlsx
    2016 CCRPI Single Scores and School Climate Star Ratings Year System ID System Name School ID School Name CCRPI Single Score School Climate Star Rating 2016 601 Appling County 103 Appling County High School 81.3 3 2016 601 Appling County 177 Appling County Elementary School 67.5 3 2016 601 Appling County 195 Appling County Middle School 74 4 2016 601 Appling County 277 Appling County Primary School NA 4 2016 601 Appling County 1050 Altamaha Elementary School 79.8 4 2016 601 Appling County 5050 Fourth District Elementary School 63 4 2016 602 Atkinson County 103 Atkinson County High School 78.5 3 2016 602 Atkinson County 111 Atkinson County Middle School 69.2 4 2016 602 Atkinson County 187 Willacoochee Elementary School 85.3 4 2016 602 Atkinson County 190 Pearson Elementary School 74.2 4 2016 603 Bacon County 102 Bacon County Primary School NA 5 2016 603 Bacon County 202 Bacon County Middle School 64.6 4 2016 603 Bacon County 302 Bacon County High School 69.1 4 2016 603 Bacon County 3050 Bacon County Elementary School 82.1 4 2016 604 Baker County 105 Baker County K12 School 62.1 5 2016 605 Baldwin County 100 Oak Hill MS 59.1 3 2016 605 Baldwin County 104 Eagle Ridge Elementary School 54.1 3 2016 605 Baldwin County 189 Baldwin High School 77.8 3 2016 605 Baldwin County 194 Midway Elementary School 56.6 4 2016 605 Baldwin County 195 Blandy Hills Elementary School 62.8 4 2016 605 Baldwin County 199 Creekside Elementary School 69 4 2016 606 Banks County 105 Banks County Middle School 77.5 4 2016 606 Banks County 107 Banks County Elementary
    [Show full text]
  • The Fur Trade Era, 1770S–1849
    Great Bear Rainforest The Fur Trade Era, 1770s–1849 The Fur Trade Era, 1770s–1849 The lives of First Nations people were irrevocably changed from the time the first European visitors came to their shores. The arrival of Captain Cook heralded the era of the fur trade and the first wave of newcomers into the future British Columbia who came from two directions in search of lucrative pelts. First came the sailors by ship across the Pacific Ocean in pursuit of sea otter, then soon after came the fort builders who crossed the continent from the east by canoe. These traders initiated an intense period of interaction between First Nations and European newcomers, lasting from the 1780s to the formation of the colony of Vancouver Island in 1849, when the business of trade was the main concern of both parties. During this era, the newcomers depended on First Nations communities not only for furs, but also for services such as guiding, carrying mail, and most importantly, supplying much of the food they required for daily survival. First Nations communities incorporated the newcomers into the fabric of their lives, utilizing the new trade goods in ways which enhanced their societies, such as using iron to replace stone axes and guns to augment the bow and arrow. These enhancements, however, came at a terrible cost, for while the fur traders brought iron and guns, they also brought unknown diseases which resulted in massive depopulation of First Nations communities. European Expansion The northwest region of North America was one of the last areas of the globe to feel the advance of European colonialism.
    [Show full text]
  • ARC174 Timberwest TFL47
    Audit of Forest Planning and Practices TimberWest Forest Corporation Tree Farm Licence 47 FPB/ARC/174 February 2015 Table of Contents Audit Results ................................................................................................................................1 Background ................................................................................................................................1 Audit Approach and Scope .........................................................................................................2 Planning and Practices Examined ..............................................................................................2 Findings ......................................................................................................................................3 Audit Opinion ..............................................................................................................................5 Appendix 1: Forest Practices Board Compliance Audit Process ............................................6 Audit Results Background As part of the Forest Practices Board's 2014 compliance audit program, the Board randomly selected the Campbell River District as the location for a full scope compliance audit. Within the district, the Board selected Tree Farm Licence (TFL) 47, held by TimberWest Forest Corporation (TimberWest), for the audit. TFL 47 is located north of Campbell River, along Johnstone Strait, and southeast of Port McNeill. TimberWest’s activities were located in 12 forest development
    [Show full text]
  • PROVINCI L Li L MUSEUM
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REPORT OF THE PROVINCI_l_Li_L MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY • FOR THE YEAR 1930 PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. VICTORIA, B.C. : Printed by CHARLES F. BANFIELD, Printer to tbe King's Most Excellent Majesty. 1931. \ . To His Honour JAMES ALEXANDER MACDONALD, Administrator of the Province of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: The undersigned respectfully submits herewith the Annual Report of the Provincial Museum of Natural History for the year 1930. SAMUEL LYNESS HOWE, Pt·ovincial Secretary. Pt·ovincial Secretary's Office, Victoria, B.O., March 26th, 1931. PROVINCIAl. MUSEUM OF NATURAl. HISTORY, VICTORIA, B.C., March 26th, 1931. The Ho1Wm·able S. L. Ho11ie, ProvinciaZ Secreta11}, Victo1·ia, B.a. Sm,-I have the honour, as Director of the Provincial Museum of Natural History, to lay before you the Report for the year ended December 31st, 1930, covering the activities of the Museum. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, FRANCIS KERMODE, Director. TABLE OF CONTENTS . PAGE. Staff of the Museum ............................. ------------ --- ------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- -------------- 6 Object.. .......... ------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- -- ---------- -- ------------------------ ----- ------------------- 7 Admission .... ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]