DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan Promoting programs that encourage and support bicycling. 2010 Walter P. Moore Bicycle Solutions CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 About the Energy Corridor District ................................................................................................. 1 About this Plan .............................................................................................................................. 1 Coordination With Other Plans and Programs ............................................................................... 4 Purpose, Principles, Goals and Objectives ........................................................................................ 6 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Principles ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Goals ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Bicycle Routes and Facilities ............................................................................................................. 9 Existing Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 9 2010 Bicycle Counts ................................................................................................................... 13 System Needs ............................................................................................................................ 16 Bikeway Options ......................................................................................................................... 18 Proposed Bikeways, Parking and Amenities ............................................................................... 24 Livable Center Study Draft Recommendations ............................................................................ 31 Education, Promotion and Outreach ............................................................................................... 42 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 42 Elements of programs ................................................................................................................. 43 Existing programs ....................................................................................................................... 47 Available programs ...................................................................................................................... 64 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 73 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 76 References ..................................................................................................................................... 77 Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan Page i LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: Energy Corridor District Location within Houston FIGURE 2: Energy Corridor Boundaries FIGURE 3: Livable Center Architectural Model (June 2010) FIGURE 4: City of Houston Existing and Proposed Bikeways (May 2009) FIGURE 5: Existing Energy Corridor District Transit and Hike & Bike Routes FIGURE 6: Bicycle and Pedestrian Count Locations (May 2010) FIGURE 7: Land Use and Major Attractors FIGURE 8: Shared Use Path FIGURE 9: Signed Shoulder Bike Route FIGURE 10: Bicycle Lane (“Bike Lane”) FIGURE 11: Signed Shared Roadway FIGURE 12: Proposed Routes FIGURE 13: Livable Center Proposed Bicycle Connections FIGURE 14: Pulteney Bridge, Bath, England (spans the River Avon) FIGURE 15: Trailville Drive Endpoints – Potential Buffalo Bayou Crossing FIGURE 16: Pipeline Easement West of SH 6 FIGURE 17: Neighborhood Access Point: Fleetwood Place Drive FIGURE 18: Commuter Bicycle Facility at BP Westlake Parking Garage FIGURE 19: LAB Scan (Shoulder-Check) Drill FIGURE 20: Energy Corridor Website- Mobility and Public Safety Page FIGURE 21: Houston Bikeway Program Website FIGURE 22: LAB Online Traffic Skills 101 Course FIGURE 23: San Francisco MTA Poster Campaigns FIGURE 24: San Francisco MTA Shared Lane Marking Educational Poster Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan Page ii INTRODUCTION ABOUT THE ENERGY CORRIDOR DISTRICT The Energy Corridor District (ECD or District) is a municipal management district in West Houston, Texas that works with public and private organizations at the local, regional, state, and national levels to attract and relocate companies to the Energy Corridor and support their success. Created in 2001 by the Texas State Legislature, the District encompasses 1,500 acres along both sides of Interstate 10 from Tully to west of Memorial Brook and along North Eldridge Parkway from Interstate 10 to south of Briar Forest. Figure 1 shows the general location of the district and Figure 2 shows the district’s boundaries. The Energy Corridor District collaborates with public agencies and has leveraged its financial resources to design and implement several key projects. ABOUT THIS PLAN Bicycling and walking are integral components of an efficient transportation network, along with public transit and the use of private motor vehicles. Therefore it is important that appropriate bicycle and pedestrian accommodations be made available to the public. The District has identified transportation as an important success factor, and wishes to provide the most comprehensive transportation network by accommodating non-motorized travel modes in addition to automobiles and transit. This Bicycle Master Plan evaluates existing conditions, addresses the needs of bicyclists in order to create a network so that they can use to safely travel to, through, within and from the Energy Corridor, and proposes programs to encourage and support bicycling. Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan Page 1 Figure 1: Energy Corridor District Location Within Houston Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan Page 2 Figure 2: Energy Corridor District Boundaries Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan Page 3 COORDINATION WITH OTHER PLANS AND PROGRAMS Houston Bikeway Program As a part of the City of Houston, the Energy Corridor District wishes to coordinate its plans with the City’s Bikeway Program. The City of Houston Bikeway Program offers a 345-mile interconnected bikeway network that spans the city. The network includes bike lanes, bike routes, shared lanes, bayou trails, rail-trails and other urban multi-use paths. Bicycle commuters can use combinations of trails, bike lanes, transit, and shared roadways to travel between their homes and work places. West Houston Trails Master Plan The Energy Corridor District is within the area addressed by the West Houston Trails Master Plan (WHTMP), which proposes a 100+ mile interconnected trail system connecting City of Houston bikeways with trails within parks, utility corridors, and along creeks and bayous. The WHTMP effort includes Energy Corridor and National Park Service officials. Community volunteers from super neighborhoods and municipal utility districts met for over two years to develop the criteria and plans. Public and private parties are motivated to complete plans and construct trails. The West Houston Trails Master Plan process has provided several opportunities for community input, including a Saturday Stakeholder workshop in October 2008 at ConocoPhillips and a community input meeting held on September 9, 2009 at Maurice L. Wolfe Elementary School. Through these community meetings the WHTMP planning team identified and incorporated the community’s perceived needs. A web site was created to gather personal comments and answer survey questions. The Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan has adopted the WHTMP goals, and will be submitted to the WHTMP subcommittees for consideration of indicated WHTMP needs that lie within the Energy Corridor District, and proposed links to ensure that the completed system has sufficient continuity and connectivity. Energy Corridor District Livable Center Plan The Houston-Galveston Area Council, the region’s Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), has identified several areas around greater Houston where improved connectivity for walking, bicycling, and transit could enable more commute and other trips to be made without the use of a private Energy Corridor District Bicycle Master Plan Page 4 auto. H-GAC’s description says “Livable Centers are walkable, mixed-use places that provide multimodal transportation options, improve environmental quality and promote economic development.” The program funds planning studies and implementation projects. A Livable Center Planning Study is underway for the Energy Corridor area with a particular focus on the Addicks Park and Ride Lot, located on the north side of IH10 (Katy Freeway) just east of State Highway 6. This study, funded by the Energy Corridor District and H-GAC and led by LRK Architects,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Upstream Addicks and Barker Dams
    In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: December 17, 2019) ********************************** ) IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND ) Post-trial decision; government-induced BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- ) flooding on private property; application of CONTROL RESERVOIRS ) factors identified in Arkansas Game & ) Fish; liability for a taking of a flowage ********************************** ) easement THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ) ) ALL UPSTREAM CASES ) ) ********************************** ) Daniel H. Charest and E. Lawrence Vincent, Burns Charest LLP, Dallas, Texas, Charles Irvine, Irvine & Conner PLLC, Houston, Texas, and Edwin Armistead Easterby, Williams Hart Boundas Easterby, LLP, Houston, Texas, Co-Lead Counsel for Upstream Plaintiffs. With them at trial were Vuk. S. Vujasinovic, VB Attorneys, PLLC, Houston Texas, Lawrence G. Dunbar, Dunbar Barder, P.L.L.C., Houston, Texas, Jack E. McGehee, McGehee, Chang, Barnes, Landgraf, Houston, Texas, Michael J. Dulaney, Sullins, Johnson, Rohrbach & Magers, Houston, Texas, Lydia A. Wright, Burns Charest LLP, Dallas, Texas, Mary Conner, Irvine & Conner, LLC, Houston, Texas, Kyril V. Talanov, Houston, Texas, and Hilary S. Greene, Houston, Texas. William Shapiro, Trial Attorney, Environmental & Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, Sacramento, California, for defendant. With him at trial and on the briefs were Kristine S. Tardiff, Laura W. Duncan, Sarah Izfar, Jessica Held, Bradley L. Levine, David L. Dain, and Mayte SantaCruz, Trial Attorneys, Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Houston-Galveston, Texas Managing Coastal Subsidence
    HOUSTON-GALVESTON, TEXAS Managing coastal subsidence TEXAS he greater Houston area, possibly more than any other Lake Livingston A N D S metropolitan area in the United States, has been adversely U P L L affected by land subsidence. Extensive subsidence, caused T A S T A mainly by ground-water pumping but also by oil and gas extraction, O C T r has increased the frequency of flooding, caused extensive damage to Subsidence study area i n i t y industrial and transportation infrastructure, motivated major in- R i v vestments in levees, reservoirs, and surface-water distribution facili- e S r D N ties, and caused substantial loss of wetland habitat. Lake Houston A L W O Although regional land subsidence is often subtle and difficult to L detect, there are localities in and near Houston where the effects are Houston quite evident. In this low-lying coastal environment, as much as 10 L Galveston feet of subsidence has shifted the position of the coastline and A Bay T changed the distribution of wetlands and aquatic vegetation. In fact, S A Texas City the San Jacinto Battleground State Historical Park, site of the battle O Galveston that won Texas independence, is now partly submerged. This park, C Gulf of Mexico about 20 miles east of downtown Houston on the shores of Galveston Bay, commemorates the April 21, 1836, victory of Texans 0 20 Miles led by Sam Houston over Mexican forces led by Santa Ana. About 0 20 Kilometers 100 acres of the park are now under water due to subsidence, and A road (below right) that provided access to the San Jacinto Monument was closed due to flood- ing caused by subsidence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shape of Things to Come: Houston Storm Water Management Post-Harvey
    The Shape of Things to Come: Houston Storm Water Management Post-Harvey John S. Grounds, III, PhD, PE, CFM, D.WRE Vice President, Director of Water Resources November 26, 2018 The Shape of Things to Come: Houston Storm Water Management Post-Harvey Hurricane Harvey has proven to be an historic event on many fronts. While the scale and breadth of destruction from the record rainfall cannot be understated, Harvey demonstrated widespread failures of a system intended to protect the fourth most populous city in the country. Numerous public and private entities are looking ahead to rebuilding and fostering new development in the most “flood-proof” ways possible. Changes to the way data is gathered and used for floodplain mapping was underway prior to Harvey, specifically Atlas 14, which is a compendium of precipitation-frequency estimates by region. What will be the impact of these changes on Houston’s floodplains? How are the regulatory agencies changing design and analysis criteria and building codes? What are the resulting implications? What will adoption of these changes mean for jurisdictional bodies? Read on for a current assessment of possible changes, and how they could drastically change Houston’s landscape. “WHILE REDUCING RISK IS POSSIBLE, ELIMINATING RISK IS NOT.”: HOUSTON’S HISTORY WITH STORM WATER MANAGEMENT The Allen brothers landed in Houston in 1832 where White Oak Bayou meets Buffalo Bayou, on the northern edge of present day downtown. The first steam ship arrived in Houston from Galveston Bay in 1837. By 1840 an accumulation of sunken ships along that stretch of Buffalo Bayou made access to downtown so challenging that a $2,000 taxpayer-funded program began removing the wrecks.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Bayou Community Plan Lit Tle Cyp Res S 1960 Upper Cypress Creek G a Watershed Rn E
    S p ri ng C re ek k Sp e ring re C C re 2920 e w k Will o 99 Buffalo Bayou Community Plan Lit tle Cyp res s 1960 Upper Cypress Creek G a Watershed rn e r Land protection, restoration, s shallow storage B Cypres ayo s C u ree k Greens Bayou Addicks Watershed G Retention, r e e creekside storage n s Addicks ReservoirWhite Oak Ba B Excavate y a o Ha y l o u ls B 75,000 acre feet ayo u C u a r p 99 e B n e t a e r r C Tunnel interceptors H s r u e B e to help reduce flooding 40-Foot n k t along Bualo Bayou in a g y Flood Tunnel 10,000 cfs B o a u y o u B u Barker Reservoir u o al y Excavate o B a 86,000 acre feet FLOOD PROTECTION PLAN COSTS ou Brays Bay Construct additional storage in the Cypress u Stream yo a 45 Reservoir boundary S B ¨¦§ Creek over�low/upper Addicks watershed $ 0.20 B i ms County Line Restore/offset Addicks storage capacity* $ 0.60 B ¤£90A Restore/offset Barker storage capacity* $ 0.90 B FEMA Flood Type )"288 Construct Buffalo Bayou Bypass Tunnel** $ 4.20 B * Provide storage to offset previously available volume Total Cost $ 6.00 B Floodway )"35 Mitigate/restore wetlands $ 0.10 B 100-year Floodplain ** on private property. Lower �lowline of reservoirs so that excavated areas drain by gravity to �lood tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo and Whiteoak Bayou Tmdl
    Total Maximum Daily Loads for Fecal Pathogens in Buffalo Bayou and Whiteoak Bayou Contract No. 582-6-70860 Work Order No. 582-6-70860-21 TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT FOR BUFFALO AND WHITEOAK BAYOU TMDL Prepared by University of Houston CDM Principal Investigator Hanadi Rifai Prepared for Total Maximum Daily Load Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality P.O. Box 13087, MC - 150 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 TCEQ Contact: Ronald Stein TMDL Team (MC-203) P.O. Box 13087, MC - 203 Austin, Texas 78711-3087 [email protected] MAY 2008 Contract #- -582-6-70860/ Work Order # 582-6-70860-21 –Technical Support Document TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………..……………..….vi LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………..……… ... ….ix CHAPTER 1 : PROBLEM DEFINITION...................................................................................... 1 1.1 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION................................................................................. 1 1.2 ENDPOINT DESIGNATION.................................................................................... 5 1.3 CRITICAL CONDITION........................................................................................... 8 1.4 MARGIN OF SAFETY.............................................................................................. 8 CHAPTER 2 : SUMMARY OF EXISTING DATA...................................................................... 9 2.1 WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS...................................................................... 9 2.1.1 LAND USE........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Floodway Buyout Strategy for a Resilient Houston a Systems Approach to Breaking the Dangerous and Expensive Cycle of Rebuilding in the Floodway
    April 2020 Floodway Buyout Strategy for a Resilient Houston A Systems Approach to Breaking the Dangerous and Expensive Cycle of Rebuilding in the Floodway Erica Vilay, Master in Public Policy Candidate, 2020 Phil Pollman, Master in Public Policy Candidate, 2020 Prepared for Advised by Offices of Recovery and Resilience, Professor Juliette Kayyem City of Houston Professor Julie Boatright Wilson Professor Christopher Avery Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Public Policy. This Policy Analysis Exercise reflects the views of the author(s) and should not be viewed as representing the views of the PAE's external client(s), nor those of Harvard University or any of its faculty. Front Cover: Residential neighborhoods near the Interstate 10 sit in floodwater in the wake of Hurricane Harvey on August 29, 2017 in Houston, Texas. (Marcus Yam / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images) Above: Debris from inside homes hit by Hurricane Harvey (©AdobeStock) About this Policy Analysis Report This policy report was developed by two public policy graduate students as part of their Policy Analysis Exercise, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Public Policy from the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This document was developed over an academic year, October 2019 to April 2020, for the Offices of Recovery and Resilience at the City of Houston. The findings, analysis, and recommendations were developed through an in-depth literature review and interviews with public servants and academic experts. This report builds directly on the work of the Office of Resilience and the Office of Recovery’s recent publications, “Living with Water” and “Resilient Houston 2050 Strategy.” The field of climate adaptation and managed retreat is new, requiring urgent research and testing through applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Houston Fifth Ward Area Flood Mitigation
    HOUSTON FIFTH WARD AREA FLOOD MITIGATION ALDINE BENDER 8 BW ¯ x Miles CDBG – MIT COH & Potential Partnership Projects 00.02.5511.522.533.544.555.566.577.588.59 Market Square Scope of The Fifth Ward area is bounded to the north by Quitman Street, Cochran Street on the Work west, Buffalo Bayou on the south and Lockwood Drive on the east.The majority of the area drains directly to Buffalo Bayou; portions north of Quitman Street drain to Hunting Bayou. The project consists of a 1.5 mile drainage trunk system on Gregg Street from Liberty to Buffalo Bayou. Market Square is located in east Houston, south of IH-10, between Lockwood and Hirsch Rd. The project will improve drainage infrastructure with upgraded storm trunk on Buck St., Schweikhardt St.,and Coke St. The drainage system will also include a new 3 x 108-inch trunk system tying to Japhet Creek. CDBG-MIT $115,021,697 Cost Estimate Structures Impacted Structures Impacted Roadway Inundation Roadway Inundation (100-year) Existing (100-year) Proposed Miles Miles Structures (100-year) Existing (100-year) Proposed Impacted and Roadway 13 Inundation 1,367 326 with greater than 3.71 6-inches (topping curb) in 100-year event For more info or questions contact: [email protected] HOUSTON KASHMERE GARDENS AREA FLOOD MITIGATION ALDINE BENDER 8 BW ¯ x Miles CDBG – MIT COH & Potential Partnership Projects 00.02.5511.522.533.544.555.566.577.588.59 Scope of The project area is located in the eastern half of the Kashmere Gardens neighborhood, Work bounded by Wipprech St.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries Flood Control Project Addicks & Barker Dams & Reservoirs 101 Past, Present & Future
    1 BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT ADDICKS & BARKER DAMS & RESERVOIRS 101 PAST, PRESENT & FUTURE “The views, opinions and findings contained in this report are those of the authors(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy or decision, unless so designated by other official documentation.” Location 2 Piney Point Gage Houston Average Annual Rainfall – 49.77 inches ADDICKS, BARKER AND BUFFALO BAYOU WATERSHEDS 3 Early Houston Floods 4 31 May-2 June 1929 and 7-10 December 1935 Buffalo Bayou & Tributaries 1940’s Original Plan 5 Ungated Conduits 6 at Addicks and Barker Dams Jan. 20, 1945 Houston 1950, 1992, 2016 7 GATING OF UNGATED CONDUITS 8 9 CHANGES AND THEIR IMPACTS Project Modifications • Deletion of South Canal = Results of Changes • Deletion of Cypress Creek Levee • Gating of the Structures • More Frequent Pools • Faster Rising Pools + Downstream Changes • Larger Pools • Increased Development • Decreased Releases • Longer Lasting Pools – + Upstream Changes • Increased Development • Increased Run-off • More Rapid Run-off Top Ten Pools – Addicks and Barker Reservoirs 10 ADDICKS DAM & RESERVOIR BARKER DAM & RESERVOIR SURFACE AREA CAPACITY IN % CAPACITY % CAPACITY OF SURFACE AREA CAPACITY IN % CAPACITY % CAPACITY OF DATE ELEV. (1) IN ACRES ACRE-FEET (2) MAX. POOL (3) GOL (4) DATE ELEV. (1) IN ACRES ACRE-FEET (2) MAX. POOL (3) GOL (4) 30 Aug '17 109.09 16,982 217,726 100.0+ 100.0 30 AUG '17 101.56 15,149 170,941 81.6 100.0 23 APR '16 102.65 12,834 123,067 61.1 96.5 25 APR '16
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Use Attainability Analysis of Buffalo/White Oak Bayou
    PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF A RECREATIONAL USE ATTAINABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE BUFFALO BAYOU/WHITE OAK BAYOU STREAM SYSTEM IN HOUSTON, TEXAS BY Dr. Kirk Winemiller Dr. David Scott Dr. Scott Shafer John Baker Bibiana Correa Po-Hsin Lai TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS August 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Acknowledgements 5 Introduction 6 Historic Information 7 Description of the Study Area 13 Methods 14 Results 19 Summary 40 Recommendations 43 References 44 Appendix 1: On-Site Observations of Recreation Uses along Buffalo Bayou 46 Appendix 2: Environmental Assessment Methodology Definitions 53 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Description of surveyed streams in Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Measurements were conducted during the summer of 2008. Stream type represents the dominant condition in the stream. Table 2. Stream Flow measurements in Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Measurements were conducted during the summer of 2008 on eleven cross sections. Table 3. Maximum depth and mean of physicochemical water characteristics of Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Values are presented from upstream to down stream and were calculated from measurements conducted during the summer of 2008, excluding obvious outliers. Abbreviations: VMD = Secchi disk was still visible at maximum depth. Table 4. Location, general surroundings, and point sources present at 85 sampled stations in the Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Table 5. Stream channel and corridor assessment per sampled station in the Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System. Table 6. Human activity registered in Buffalo Bayou/White Oak Bayou Stream System during the summer of 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Brays Bayou Above Tidal (Unclassified Water Body) Segment: 1007B San Jacinto River Basin
    2004 Texas Water Quality Inventory Page : 1 (based on data from 03/01/1996 to 02/28/2001) Brays Bayou Above Tidal (unclassified water body) Segment: 1007B San Jacinto River Basin Basin number: 10 Basin group: C Water body description: Perennial stream from 11.5 km upstream of confluence with Houston Ship Channel up to SH 6 Water body classification: Unclassified Water body type: Freshwater Stream Water body length / area: 19.7 Miles Water body uses: Aquatic Life Use, Contact Recreation Use, Fish Consumption Use Standards Not Met in 2002 Assessment Area Use Support Status Parameter Category From 11.5km upstream of confluence Contact Recreation Use Not Supporting bacteria 5a with Houston Ship Channel (Brays Bayou Tidal) to SH 6 Additional Information: The aquatic life use is fully supported. The fish consumption use was not assessed. 2002 Concerns: Assessment Area Use or Concern Concern Status Description of Concern From 11.5km upstream of confluence Nutrient Enrichment Concern Concern ammonia with Houston Ship Channel (Brays Bayou Tidal) to SH 6 From 11.5km upstream of confluence Nutrient Enrichment Concern Concern nitrate+nitrite nitrogen with Houston Ship Channel (Brays Bayou Tidal) to SH 6 From 11.5km upstream of confluence Nutrient Enrichment Concern Concern orthophosphorus with Houston Ship Channel (Brays Bayou Tidal) to SH 6 From 11.5km upstream of confluence Nutrient Enrichment Concern Concern total phosphorus with Houston Ship Channel (Brays Bayou Tidal) to SH 6 Monitoring sites used: Assessment Area Station ID Station Description
    [Show full text]
  • Drainage/Spring Creek Watershed Project
    Proposal Prepared for: The Woodlands Township Drainage/Spring Creek Watershed Project (C-2017-0481) November 2017 Professional Engineering Services The Woodlands Township Drainage/Spring Creek Watershed Project C-2017-0481 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 HISTORY OF THE FIRM .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 2 PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM & ORGANIZATIONAL CHART ............................................................................... 5 3 EXPERIENCE .............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 4 RESUMES ................................................................................................................................................................................... 13 5 PROJECT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY / APPROACH ......................................................................................... 13 5.1 Project Approach ........................................................................................................................................................................ 13 5.2 Project Management Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 14 6 EXAMPLES OF SIMILAR PROJECTS ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bayous and Galveston Bay Report Card - with Additional Details
    Bayous and Galveston Bay Report Card - With Additional Details Water Recreation Safety (fecal bacteria): Bayous: C Galveston Bay: A Action Items: Report sewage spills, collect pet waste, proper maintenance of septic and aerobic on-site sewage treatment, and pump out boat sewage in designated facilities Dissolved Oxygen (aquatic life health): Bayous: A Galveston Bay: A Action Items: preserve and restore habitats by planting native plants and removing invasive, exotic species; slow runoff by reducing paved areas, use rain gardens and rainfall harvesting Phosphorus (eutrophication/ algae blooms): Bayous: C Galveston Bay: B Action Items: Proper use of fertilizers, use of slow release and organic plant fertilizers; avoid or reduce phosphates in cleaning products Nitrogen (eutrophication/ algae blooms): Bayous: A Galveston Bay: B Action Items: Proper use of fertilizers, use of slow release and organic plant fertilizers Litter and Trash (wildlife entanglement/ingestion, aesthetics): Bayous: I Galveston Bay: I Action Items: Participate in clean-ups, clean your surroundings, report littering and illegal dumping, dispose of trash properly and encourage others to do the same Grades: A = Excellent B = Good C = Adequate for now D = Requires Action F = Critical I = Insufficient Data (since Texas does not measure floatable debris as a water quality standard in the manner it does other pollutants) For additional details on this report card, see the Details below. Additional details on the Galveston Bay conditions and grading methodology are at: www.galvbaygrade.org
    [Show full text]