DOCSLIB.ORG

The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence G. W. Leibniz and Samuel Clarke ....• Correspondence Edited, with Introduction, by Roger Ariew Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. Indianapolis/ Cambridge For DBA, DAA, and SAA Copyright © 2000 by Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 10 09 08 07 06 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 For further information, please address: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. P. 0. Box 44937 Indianapolis, IN 46244-0937 www.hackettpublishing.com Cover design by Listen berger Design & Associates Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1646-1716. Correspondence I G.W. Leibniz and Samuel Clarke; edited with an introduction, by Roger Ariew. p. em. ISBN 0-87220-524-X (pbk.)- ISBN 0-87220-525-8 (cloth). 1. Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1646-1716- Correspondence. 2. Clarke, Samuel, 1675-1729-Correspondence. 3. Philosophers--Germany-Correspondence. 4. Philosophers-­ England-Correspondence. 5. Natural theology-Early works to 1900. 6. Newton, Isaac, Sir, 1642-1727. I. Clarke, Samuel. II. Ariew, Roger. III. Title. B2597 .A4 2000 193-dc21 99-052339 CIP ISBN-13: 978-0-87220-525-3 (cloth) ISBN-13: 978-0-87220-524-6 (pbk.) The paper used in this publication meets the minimum standard requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences--Permanence of Paper for Printed Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................... vi Introduction ................................................................................... vii Leibniz, Caroline, Newton, and Clarke ... ........................................ vii Editor's Note ................ ... ....................... ...................................... xiv Clarke's Introduction...... .... .............................................................. 1 To Her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales ................................... 1 Advertisement to the Reader ....................................................... ..... 3 The Correspondence ......................................................................... 4 Leibniz's First Letter, Being an Extract of a Letter Written in November, 1715 .... .. .. ............................................................. 4 Clarke's First Reply ... .. .... ............................................................ .... 5 Leibniz's Second Letter, Being an Answer to Clarke's First Reply .................... .. ............................................................... 7 Clarke's Second Reply ................................................................... 11 Leibniz's Third Letter, Being an Answer to Clarke's Second Reply .. .. .................... ..................... ...................... ................ 14 Clarke's Third Reply .. .. ........................... ....................................... 18 Leibniz's Fourth Letter, Being an Answer to Clarke's Third Reply.......................................................................... 22 Clarke's Fourth Reply .. .... ......................... ..................................... 29 Leibniz's Fifth Letter, Being an Answer to Clarke's Fourth Reply ..................... ...................................... 36 Clarke's Fifth Reply .................................. ..................... ................ 66 Appendices ........................ .. ............................................................ 88 A: Passages from Leibniz's Works That May Shed Light on Many Parts of the Previous Letters .... ................................... 88 B: Selections from Newton's Works ... .. .. .. ...................................... 95 1. Principia, Scholium to Definitions ......................................... 95 2. Principia, General Scholium ................................................ 101 3. Optics, end of Q!tery 31 ........................................................ 105 v Abbreviations AG G. W. Leibniz, Philosophical Essays, eds. and trans. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1989) G G. W. Leibniz, Die phi/Qsophischen Schriften, ed. C. I. Gerhardt, 7 vols. (Berlin, 1875-1890; reprinted. Hildesheirn: Georg Olrns, 1978) GM G. W. Leibniz, Mathematische Schriften, ed. C. I. Gerhardt, 7 vols. (Berlin, 1849-1855; reprinted. Hildesheirn: Georg Olrns, 1962) H G. W. Leibniz, Theodicy, trans. E. M. Huggard (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1985) K Die Werke von Leibniz, ed. 0. Klopp, 11 vols. (Hanover, 1864- 1884; reprinted. Hildesheirn: Olrns, 1973) L G. W. Leibniz, PhikJsophical Papers and Letters, ed. and trans. L. Loernker (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1969) VI Introduction Leibniz, Caroline, Newton, and Clarke In November of 1715, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, the elderly librar­ ian, historian, and counselor to the House of Hanover in Lower Saxony, wrote a letter to Caroline, Princess of Wales, cautioning her about the odd cosmological-theological views of Sir Isaac Newton and his followers. This would seem an unusual event in international relations except that Leibniz had a long-standing relationship with Caroline, who was married to Georg August. The latter was Prince of Wales, Elector Prince of Hanover, and son of Leibniz's employer, Georg Ludwig, Elector of Hanover1 who, from 1714 on, was George I, King of Great Britain and Ireland. Caroline became Queen Consort in 1727 when Georg August ascended to the throne of England as George II;2 she was the third of three royal women who had befriended Leibniz.3 The whole court of Hanover had moved to London in 1714. However, Leibniz was not wel­ come there. Georg Ludwig had refused his request to join the royal family in England. The official reason was that he was to stay in Hanover until the history of the House of Hanover, which he was commissioned to write, was closer to completion.4 By 1714 there was great hostility at the 1. Elector Georg Ludwig was the third of Leibniz's employers in Hanover (from 1698 to Leibniz's death in 1716), the first having been Duke Johann Freid­ rich who first retained Leibniz (from 1676 to 1679) and the second his brother Duke, then Elector, Ernst August (Leibniz's employer from 1679 to 1698 and Georg Ludwig's father). 2. Caroline was the mother ofFrederick Louis, Prince of Wales, and thus grand­ mother of George III, "Old King George" of the American Revolution. For more on Caroline and the context for the correspondence, see Domenico Bertoloni Meli, "Caroline, Leibniz, and Clarke," Journal ofthe History ofIdeas 60 (1999): 469-86. 3. Including Georg Ludwig's sister Sophia Charlotte, Electress of Branden­ burg, then Queen of Prussia, and his mother Sophia, Electress of Hanover. 4. Ernst August had asked Leibniz to write a history of the House of Hanover in the 1680s. Leibniz took on the task with his customary zeal and optimism, that is, he took on much more than he could reasonably accomplish. The only finished manuscript of the history he left behind was its first volume, Protogaea, a treatise on natural history or geology. Leibniz intended to preface his history with a dis­ sertation on the state of Germany as it was prior to all histories, taking as evidence the natural monuments, shells petrified in earth, and stones with the imprint of fish or plants. He contemplated continuing his history by treating the oldest known VII viii G. W. Leibniz and Samuel Clarke court to the then elderly counselor. He was often a subject of ridicule, treated as an old fossil, with his enormous black wig and once fashionable ornate clothes. The court may have been unhappy with his failure to finish the history of the House of Hanover,5 but it was also surely embarrassed by the protracted debate between him and Newton over the discovery of the calculus, which had taken on decidedly nationalistic overtones.6 Admittedly, the debate about the priority of the invention of the cal­ culus was not the only controversy of the final period of Leibniz's life, but it was certainly the most bitter. The first public blow in the dispute was probably delivered by Fatio de Dullier, who wrote an article in 1697 attributing the discovery to Newton and attacking Leibniz. The feud people, then the different peoples that succeeded one another, their languages, and the mixtures of these languages, to the extent that they can be judged by etymolo­ gies. The origins of the House would have begun with Charlemagne and continued with the Emperors descended from him and with the five Emperors of the House of Brunswick, encompassing the ancient history of Saxony through the House of Witikind, ofUpper Germany through the House of the Guelfs, and of Lombardy through the Houses of the Dukes and Marquis of Tuscany and Liguria, thus trac­ ing the descent of the Princes of Brunswick. After these origins would have come the genealogy of the House of the Guelfs, with a short history up to the seven­ teenth century; the genealogy would have been accompanied by those of the other great Houses, including the House of the Ghibellines, ancient and modern Aus­ tria, and Bavaria. To accomplish his design and to amass sufficient materials, Leib­ niz scoured the whole of Germany, visited ancient abbeys, searched town archives, and examined tombs and other antiquities. Although he never completed his his­ tory, we should not think that he balked at the project; one cannot look upon the masses of corollary materials he did publish and think that he was not committed to it. He left behind enough materials that G. H. Pertz, a Hanover librarian and editor ofLeibniz's works,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Philosophical and Historical Analysis of Cosmology from Copernicus to Newton
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2017 Scientific transformations: a philosophical and historical analysis of cosmology from Copernicus to Newton Manuel-Albert Castillo University of Central Florida Part of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Castillo, Manuel-Albert, "Scientific transformations: a philosophical and historical analysis of cosmology from Copernicus to Newton" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 5694. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/5694 SCIENTIFIC TRANSFORMATIONS: A PHILOSOPHICAL AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF COSMOLOGY FROM COPERNICUS TO NEWTON by MANUEL-ALBERT F. CASTILLO A.A., Valencia College, 2013 B.A., University of Central Florida, 2015 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the department of Interdisciplinary Studies in the College of Graduate Studies at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2017 Major Professor: Donald E. Jones ©2017 Manuel-Albert F. Castillo ii ABSTRACT The purpose of this thesis is to show a transformation around the scientific revolution from the sixteenth to seventeenth centuries against a Whig approach in which it still lingers in the history of science. I find the transformations of modern science through the cosmological models of Nicholas Copernicus, Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei and Isaac Newton.
    [Show full text]
  • Pt: Must Translate By: 2
    Solution to Challenge 3 Start by using the description of the MPSC cipher and Hint 1. We have: pt: m u s t Translate by: 2 3 4 5 CT: P Y X Z What this tells you: 1. If “m” was shifted two to the right to arrive at “p”, the “n” or “o” must be missing in between them. That means that “n” or “o” (but not both) appear in the keyword. This assumes that “m” isn’t in the keyword, but since it lies two letters from “p” it looks like it is in the normal alphabetical sequence. 2. One of “v”, “w”, or “x” must also be in the keyword. (The keyword is not “kryptos” !). Again, this assumes that “u” is not in the keyword. 3. Once again, since “s” is about 4 letters from “x” in the normal alphabet, we assume that “s” and “x” are not in the keyword but appearing in alphabetical order. This agrees nicely with #2: “v” or “w” is in the keyword AND “t” and “u” are NOT in the keyword (since we need these letters to keep “s” and “x” 4 letters apart. 4. If “v” or “w” is in the keyword, this makes “t” 5 letters from “z” if “y” and “z” are not in the keyword. Then end of the alphabet line looks like: … m (n o ) p… s t u (v w) x y z where parentheses were used to indicate groupings where one letter is missing (and appears earlier in the keyword). In order to make further progress, one might start guessing at possible two letter words that could reasonably precede “must”: “we” and “it” come to mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One Concerning Motion in General
    EULER'S MECHANICA VOL. 1. Chapter one. Translated and annotated by Ian Bruce. page 1 Chapter One Concerning Motion In General. [p. 1] DEFINITION 1. 1. Motion is the translation of a body from the place it occupies to another place. Truly rest is a body remaining at the same place. Corollary 1. 2. Therefore the ideas of the body remaining at rest and of moving to other places cannot be entertained together, except that they occupy a place. Whereby the place or position the body occupies shall be a property of the body, that can be said to be possible only for that body, and that the body is either moving or at rest. Corollary 2. 3. And this idea of moving or of being at rest is a property of a body that relates to all bodies. For no body is able to exist that is neither moving nor at rest. DEFINITION 2. 4. The place [occupied by a body] is a part of the immense or boundless space which constitutes the whole world. In this sense the accepted place is accustomed to be called the absolute place [p. 2], in order that it may be distinguished from a relative place, of which mention will soon be made. Corollary 1. 5. Therefore, when a body occupies successively one part and then another, of this immense space, then it is said to be moving ; but if it continues to be present at the same place always, then it is said to be at rest. Corollary 2. 6. Moreover, it is customery to consider fixed boundaries of this space, to which bodies can be referred.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rhetorical Analysis of Sir Isaac Newton's Principia A
    A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF SIR ISAAC NEWTON’S PRINCIPIA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE TEXAS WOMAN’S UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, SPEECH, AND FOREIGN LANGUAGES COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES BY GIRIBALA JOSHI, B.S., M.S. DENTON, TEXAS AUGUST 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Giribala Joshi DEDICATION Nature and Nature’s Laws lay hid in Night: God said, “Let Newton be!” and all was light. ~ Alexander Pope Dedicated to all the wonderful eighteenth-century Enlightenment thinkers and philosophers! ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge the continuous support and encouragement that I received from the Department of English, Speech and Foreign Languages. I especially want to thank my thesis committee member Dr. Ashley Bender, and my committee chair Dr. Brian Fehler, for their guidance and feedback while writing this thesis. iii ABSTRACT GIRIBALA JOSHI A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF SIR ISAAC NEWTON’S PRINCIPIA AUGUST 2018 In this thesis, I analyze Isaac Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica in the framework of Aristotle’s theories of rhetoric. Despite the long-held view that science only deals with brute facts and does not require rhetoric, we learn that science has its own special topics. This study highlights the rhetorical situation of the Principia and Newton’s rhetorical strategies, emphasizing the belief that scientific facts and theories are also rhetorical constructions. This analysis shows that the credibility of the author and the text, the emotional debates before and after the publication of the text, the construction of logical arguments, and the presentation style makes the book the epitome of scientific writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Euripides” Johanna Hanink
    The Life of the Author in the Letters of “Euripides” Johanna Hanink N 1694, Joshua Barnes, the eccentric British scholar (and poet) of Greek who the next year would become Regius Professor at the University of Cambridge, published his I 1 long-awaited Euripidis quae extant omnia. This was an enormous edition of Euripides’ works which contained every scrap of Euripidean material—dramatic, fragmentary, and biographical —that Barnes had managed to unearth.2 In the course of pre- paring the volume, Barnes had got wind that Richard Bentley believed that the epistles attributed by many ancient manu- scripts to Euripides were spurious; he therefore wrote to Bentley asking him to elucidate the grounds of his doubt. On 22 February 1693, Bentley returned a letter to Barnes in which he firmly declared that, with regard to the ancient epistles, “tis not Euripides himself that here discourseth, but a puny sophist that acts him.” Bentley did, however, recognize that convincing others of this would be a difficult task: “as for arguments to prove [the letters] spurious, perhaps there are none that will convince any person that doth not discover it by himself.”3 1 On the printing of the book and its early distribution see D. McKitterick, A History of Cambridge University Press I Printing and the Book Trade in Cambridge, 1534–1698 (Cambridge 1992) 380–392; on Joshua Barnes see K. L. Haugen, ODNB 3 (2004) 998–1001. 2 C. Collard, Tragedy, Euripides and Euripideans (Bristol 2007) 199–204, re- hearses a number of criticisms of Barnes’ methods, especially concerning his presentation of Euripidean fragments (for which he often gave no source, and which occasionally consisted of lines from the extant plays).
    [Show full text]
  • Newton.Indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag
    omslag Newton.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag. 1 e Dutch Republic proved ‘A new light on several to be extremely receptive to major gures involved in the groundbreaking ideas of Newton Isaac Newton (–). the reception of Newton’s Dutch scholars such as Willem work.’ and the Netherlands Jacob ’s Gravesande and Petrus Prof. Bert Theunissen, Newton the Netherlands and van Musschenbroek played a Utrecht University crucial role in the adaption and How Isaac Newton was Fashioned dissemination of Newton’s work, ‘is book provides an in the Dutch Republic not only in the Netherlands important contribution to but also in the rest of Europe. EDITED BY ERIC JORINK In the course of the eighteenth the study of the European AND AD MAAS century, Newton’s ideas (in Enlightenment with new dierent guises and interpre- insights in the circulation tations) became a veritable hype in Dutch society. In Newton of knowledge.’ and the Netherlands Newton’s Prof. Frans van Lunteren, sudden success is analyzed in Leiden University great depth and put into a new perspective. Ad Maas is curator at the Museum Boerhaave, Leiden, the Netherlands. Eric Jorink is researcher at the Huygens Institute for Netherlands History (Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences). / www.lup.nl LUP Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 1 Newton and the Netherlands Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 2 Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag.
    [Show full text]
  • All of a Sudden: the Role of Ἐξαίφνης in Plato's Dialogues
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 1-1-2014 All of a Sudden: The Role of Ἐξαιφ́ νης in Plato's Dialogues Joseph J. Cimakasky Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Cimakasky, J. (2014). All of a Sudden: The Role of Ἐξαιφ́ νης in Plato's Dialogues (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/68 This Worldwide Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALL OF A SUDDEN: THE ROLE OF ἘΧΑΙΦΝΗΣ IN PLATO’S DIALOGUES A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Joseph Cimakasky May 2014 Copyright by Joseph Cimakasky 2014 ALL OF A SUDDEN: THE ROLE OF ἘΧΑΙΦΝΗΣ IN PLATO’S DIALOGUES By Joseph Cimakasky Approved April 9, 2014 ________________________________ ________________________________ Ronald Polansky Patrick Lee Miller Professor of Philosophy Professor of Philosophy (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) ________________________________ John W. McGinley Professor of Philosophy (Committee Member) ________________________________ ________________________________ James Swindal Ronald Polansky Dean, McAnulty College Chair, Philosophy Department Professor of Philosophy Professor of Philosophy iii ABSTRACT ALL OF A SUDDEN: THE ROLE OF ἘΧΑΙΦΝΗΣ IN PLATO’S DIALOGUES By Joseph Cimakasky May 2014 Dissertation supervised by Professor Ronald Polansky There are thirty-six appearances of the Greek word ἐξαίφνης in Plato’s dialogues.
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Predictability Norms for Pairs of Words Differing in a Single Letter
    H I LLINI S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007. ~66' Technical Report No. 260 CONTEXTUAL PREDICTABILITY NORMS FOR PAIRS OF WORDS DIFFERING IN A SINGLE LETTER Harry E. Blanchard, George W. McConkie and David Zola University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign August 1982 Center for the Study of Reading TECHNICAL REPORTS UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 51 Gerty Drive Champaign, Illinois 61820 BOLT BERANEK AND NEWMAN INC. 50 Moulton Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02238 [LtHE LIBRARY OF TH-I The National Institute of Education U.S. Department of Education UNIVE.SITY OF ILL:S Washington. D.C. 20208 IT ^a -- CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF READING Technical Report No. 260 CONTEXTUAL PREDICTABILITY' NORMS FOR PAIRS OF WORDS DIFFERING IN A SINGLE LETTER Harry E. Blanchard, George W. McConkie and David Zola University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign August 1982 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc. 51 Gerty Drive 50 Moulton Street Champaign, Illinois 61820. Cambridge, Massachusetts 02238 This research was conducted under grants MH 32884 and MH 33408 from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first author, and National Institute of Education contract HEW-NIE-C-400-76-0116 to the Center for the Study of Reading. Copies of this report can be obtained by writing to George W. McConkie, Center for the Study of Reading, 51 Gerty Drive, Champaign, Illinois 61820. EDITORIAL BOARD William Nagy and Stephen Wilhite Co--Editors Harry Blanchard Anne Hay Charlotte Blomeyer Asghar Iran-Nejad Nancy Bryant Margi Laff Avon Crismore Terence Turner Meg Sallagher Paul Wilson Abstract Predictability Norms Four hundred sixty-seven pairs of short texts were written.
    [Show full text]
  • Maty's Biography of Abraham De Moivre, Translated
    Statistical Science 2007, Vol. 22, No. 1, 109–136 DOI: 10.1214/088342306000000268 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2007 Maty’s Biography of Abraham De Moivre, Translated, Annotated and Augmented David R. Bellhouse and Christian Genest Abstract. November 27, 2004, marked the 250th anniversary of the death of Abraham De Moivre, best known in statistical circles for his famous large-sample approximation to the binomial distribution, whose generalization is now referred to as the Central Limit Theorem. De Moivre was one of the great pioneers of classical probability the- ory. He also made seminal contributions in analytic geometry, complex analysis and the theory of annuities. The first biography of De Moivre, on which almost all subsequent ones have since relied, was written in French by Matthew Maty. It was published in 1755 in the Journal britannique. The authors provide here, for the first time, a complete translation into English of Maty’s biography of De Moivre. New mate- rial, much of it taken from modern sources, is given in footnotes, along with numerous annotations designed to provide additional clarity to Maty’s biography for contemporary readers. INTRODUCTION ´emigr´es that both of them are known to have fre- Matthew Maty (1718–1776) was born of Huguenot quented. In the weeks prior to De Moivre’s death, parentage in the city of Utrecht, in Holland. He stud- Maty began to interview him in order to write his ied medicine and philosophy at the University of biography. De Moivre died shortly after giving his Leiden before immigrating to England in 1740. Af- reminiscences up to the late 1680s and Maty com- ter a decade in London, he edited for six years the pleted the task using only his own knowledge of the Journal britannique, a French-language publication man and De Moivre’s published work.
    [Show full text]
  • Answers and Solutions
    ANSWERS AND SOLUTIONS A Foul Ghoul Soul Loves Good Blood Food R. Lederer A FOUL GHOUL SOUL LOVES GOOD BLOOD FOOD (Other answers are possible) 1. swamp 2. boot 3. heard 4. golf 5. bowl 6. mint 7. brooch 8. breast 9. earth 10. hoof 11. kook 12. down 13. wool 14. boss 15. hog 16. cheese 17. wash 18. keen 19. break 20. font 21. sew 22. watch 23. gouge 24. scarf 25. heath 26. choose 27. doll 28. rouse 29. caste 30. are 3 1. fiend 32. drought 33. broad 34. salve 3 5. coup 36. waft 37. warm 3 8. aunt 39. dull 40. tow 41. indict 42. believe 43. again 44. segue 45. obese 46. second 47. pureed 48. parfait 49. entourage 50. eunuch 51. karaoke 52. syllable 53. calliope 54. fever 55. mousy 56. matinee 57. pastiche 58. heroin 59. layer 60. devil 61. imply 62. demon 63. frozen 64. menial 65. viscount 66. bury 67. quarry 68. beady 69. gully 70. jowly 71. ginger 72. pinto 73. wicked 74. solder 75. yodel 76. patent 77. squalor 78. daughter 79. tinder 80. bother 81. gallop 82. deface 83. dumber 84. seven 85. suet 86. whether 87. pudding 88. stingy 89. waddle 90. wattle 91. breather 92. gelato 93. malaria 94. wander 95. plunger 96. younger 97. swollen 98. warden 99. silo 100. chamber 316 Preposterous Precincts J. Puder Alifiay: Salman Rushdie, Haroun and the Sea of Stories, 1990 Atlantis: Plato, Critias, 4thcent. B.C.E. Back of the North Wind: George Macdonald, At the Back of the North Wind, 1870 Bengodi: Giovanni Boccaccio, Decameron, 185 8 Broc6liande: Alfred, Lord Termyson, The Idylls of the King, 1859-85 Centrum Terrae: Hans von Grimmelshausen, Simplicissimus, 1688 Cloudcuckooland: Aristophanes, The Birds, 414 B.C.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes Steven Shapin Isis, Vol. 72, No. 2. (Jun., 1981), Pp
    Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes Steven Shapin Isis, Vol. 72, No. 2. (Jun., 1981), pp. 187-215. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-1753%28198106%2972%3A2%3C187%3AOGAKNP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C Isis is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Mon Aug 20 10:29:37 2007 Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes By Steven Shapin* FTER TWO AND A HALF CENTURIES the Newton-Leibniz disputes A continue to inflame the passions.
    [Show full text]
  • Caroline, Leibniz, and Clarke Author(S): D. Bertoloni Meli Source: Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol
    Caroline, Leibniz, and Clarke Author(s): D. Bertoloni Meli Source: Journal of the History of Ideas, Vol. 60, No. 3 (Jul., 1999), pp. 469-486 Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3654014 . Accessed: 22/02/2011 14:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=upenn. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of Pennsylvania Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the History of Ideas. http://www.jstor.org Caroline, Leibniz, and Clarke D. Bertoloni Meli The papers which passed between Leibniz and Clarke from 1715 to 1716 have long been considered classics in the history of science and philosophy, attractinga largenumber of scholarlyworks.
    [Show full text]