1.3 News Feat Lasers MH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1.3 News Feat Lasers MH NEWS FEATURE NATURE|Vol 446|1 March 2007 EXTREME LIGHT Physicists are planning lasers powerful enough to rip apart the fabric of space and time. Ed Gerstner is impressed. 16 NATURE|Vol 446|1 March 2007 NEWS FEATURE lmost 100 million times more pow- something altogether more exotic, unpredict- High-power lasers achieve their awesome erful than its earliest ancestor, the able and nonlinear. intensities by squeezing moderate amounts of Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is Pump in enough energy, and the paired vir- energy into very short-lived bursts, thus driv- C. DARKIN Athe latest triumph in a century of tual particles become real, separated at birth by ing up the power — which is energy divided astounding physics. Officially inaugurated the extraordinarily strong fields involved. This by time. So although the power of NIF’s lasers later this year, the €3.7-billion (US$4.9-bil- energy level, currently thought to require fields sounds incredible, they actually use relatively lion) accelerator at CERN, Europe’s particle- of a little more than 8×1018 volts per metre, is small amounts of energy. A single pulse con- physics laboratory, will next year be fully up to known as the Schwinger limit, and it is the tains just 2,000 kilojoules — roughly half a speed in its search for exotic phenomena, such point at which the vacuum sea begins to boil. kilowatt hour. It’s just that all that energy is as the Higgs boson, that can only be discovered “When I give talks to general audiences, delivered in a few billionths of a second. at the extreme energies it makes available. Yet that’s the thing that they really seem to get even before it is turned on, the particle-physics drawn in by,” says Tom Katsouleas, an extreme- Power trip community is already looking beyond it, with laser enthusiast at the University of Southern The ELI takes the same principle further. By plans for an even more powerful machine, the California in Los Angeles. The problem is that generating pulses a million times shorter than International Linear Collider (ILC), which will the Schwinger limit is a long way away. For those of NIF — five femtoseconds — the ELI cost some $6.7 billion. fields of 8×1018 V m−1 you need a laser with an should fairly quickly be able to generate peak At about the time that the LHC hopes to intensity of more than 1030 W cm−2 — a thou- powers of more than a petawatt (1015 watts) be homing in on the Higgs, construction of sand trillion times more intense than NIF. from just a few joules of energy. This radically a much less feted multibillion-dollar physics Given NIF’s multibillion-dollar pricetag, that reduced need for energy makes things much research facility, the National Ignition Facility seems an overly ambitious target. easier than they are at NIF. By shortening the (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore National Labo- But a team led by Gérard Mourou, director pulse lengths by a factor of a hundred more, ratory in California, will be reaching comple- of the Laboratory of Applied Optics near Paris, down to tens of attoseconds (10−18 seconds), tion. At a cost of about US$4 billion, NIF is believes it can meet this target for a relatively the ELI’s proponents hope to reach peak inten- an assembly of 192 lasers that, for a billionth moderate price. And the researchers predict all sities of more than 100 petawatts. of a second at a time, can pump out energy at manner of wonders on the way to their even- The ELI’s extraordinarily short pulses will be more than 50 times the rate that it is generated tual goal. Throughout their made possible by a technique in all of Earth’s power stations put together. history, lasers have excited “I am always called chirped-pulse amplifi- Its aim is to ignite a fusion reaction that turns physicists by opening up new cation (CPA), which Mourou a tiny pellet of hydrogen at the lasers’ focus possibilities with light. In the astonished at what developed at the University into helium. 1960s, the fact that early lasers experimentalists can of Rochester, New York, in Science at NIF will bring astrophysics into were powerful enough to actually do if they the mid-1980s. CPA works by the laboratory by aping stars in microcosm, change the refractive index of decomposing the light in a laser and it could conceivably provide the basis for the medium through which put their minds to it.” pulse using a diffraction grat- future energy generation. But the main ration- they travelled opened up fresh — William Unruh ing known as a stretcher, which ale for NIF, and the reason it has been able to vistas in ‘nonlinear’ optics. acts like a prism. Having been command the budget that it has, is to help the Today the frontier buzzword stretched, the pulse’s compo- United States assure the operability and safety is ‘relativistic optics’ — systems in which the nents, now spread out in space and time, are of its nuclear arsenal. Similar motivations lie fields associated with the laser light can accel- fed individually through an optical amplifier, behind the French Laser MegaJoule (LMJ) erate every electron in the medium the light is before a similar grating designed for the oppo- facility, which is expected to achieve ignition passing through close to the speed of light. site effect — a ‘compressor’ — re unites them a few years after NIF. into a pulse far shorter and more intense than The lasers of the LMJ and NIF don’t come Need for speed the original. close to an accelerator such as the LHC in Mourou’s proposal — the Extreme Light Infra- These stretchers and compressors are cur- terms of generating excitement among physi- structure (ELI) — would up the ante further, rently used on almost all of the world’s most cists. At least, not yet. But laser beams even moving into ‘ultrarelativistic systems’ in which powerful lasers except those, such as NIF and more intense than NIF’s — and far cheaper to not only electrons but also the ions from which the LMJ, that need pulses that are relatively generate — might in the next decades begin to they have been stripped move close to the long (of the order of nanoseconds). Osaka Uni- take over from particle accelerators in explor- speed of light. Mourou notes that the nonlin- versity and the Central Laser Facility at Ruther- ing the outermost frontiers of the physical ear effects of lasers revealed in the 1960s far ford Appleton Laboratory in Didcot, UK, both world. The world may never see conventional exceeded expectations. “Only the tip of the have CPA lasers that can generate a petawatt, particle accelerators much more powerful iceberg was predicted,” he says. He is similarly and the University of Rochester is also build- than the LHC and ILC. But lasers a million optimistic about what the new energies avail- ing one, as are other institutions. Mourou and times more intense than NIF are already to be able at the ELI could deliver. others feel that the technique has, as yet, no found in the presentations of physicists look- On 15 February, the French government obvious limitations; pulses can go on getting ing for funding. announced that it had bought into the vision shorter and shorter. enough to pay for a new laser beamline at the In 2006, the ELI was one of 35 projects Let there be light Laboratory of Applied Optics to show that the short-listed for consideration under the Euro- The guiding inspiration for extreme lasers lies ELI could work. If it goes ahead, the full facility pean Roadmap for Research Infrastructures, in the way light interacts with the vacuum. would provide unprecedented opportunities a programme that will provide money to help Quantum field theory sees the vacuum as a for scientists to pursue fundamental, curiosity- develop proposals for international projects. strange sea of possibilities, where pairs of ‘vir- driven science, says Mourou. Perhaps more Also on the shortlist is another, costlier tual’ particles and antiparticles ceaselessly pop importantly, it would be relatively cheap, cost- project that plans to use a CPA-enabled laser. in and out of existence. When light is bright ing €138 million to build and €6 million per A consortium led by the Central Laser Facil- enough, the electromagnetic fields it is com- year to run — considerably less than the £380- ity wants to build HiPER — the High Power posed of begin to interact with that sea in unu- million (US$746-million) Diamond synchro- Laser Energy Research facility — as a civilian sual ways. The vacuum no longer behaves as tron X-ray source recently opened in Britain, equivalent to NIF and the LMJ, but pursuing a simple, predictable medium — it becomes for example. a subtly different path to fusion. Whereas NIF 17 NEWS FEATURE NATURE|Vol 446|1 March 2007 and the LMJ use megajoule beams to hitch a ride on the wake left behind by crush their targets into fusion, the an intense pulse of laser light blasting €855-million HiPER would com- through a plasma. press the target comparatively gently “If you look at the progress that has and then ignite it with a much shorter gone on in laser wakefield accelera- high-power pulse. tors,” says Katsouleas, “and extrapolate One advantage of this approach is that to the kinds of powers that peo- that the laser could be fired far more ple are talking about for the ELI, then frequently than NIF.
Recommended publications
  • Europe for Inertial Confinement Fusion
    EuropeEurope forfor InertialInertial ConfinementConfinement FusionFusion Technology Watch Workshop on IFE-KIT Madrid March 22, 2010 Jiri Ullschmied Association EURATOM IPP.CR PALS Research Centre, a joint laboratory of the Institute of Physics and Institute of Plasma Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic www.pals.cas.cz Paper Layout State of the art - where are we now Lasers on the path to fusion National Ignition Facility Indirect drive / direct drive European lasers, LMJ Coordinated European effort in the laser research Various ignition scenarios - EU KIT contributions SWOT Summary State of the art - where are we now Steadily increasing progress in laser technology since 1960, lasers becoming the most dynamic field of physical research in the last decade. Megajoule and multi-PW lasers have become reality, laser beam focused intensity has been increased up to 1022 W/cm2 (Astra, UK). Last-generation high-power lasers - an unmatched tool for high-energy density physical research and potential fusion drivers. High-energy lasers worldwide Lasers on the path to Fusion Max output energy of single beam systems (Nd-glass, iodine, KrF) in the 1-10 kJ range, while EL > 1 MJ is needed for central ignition => multi-beam laser systems. Various fast ignition schemes are have been proposed, which should decrease the required energy by an order of magnitude. History and future of IFE lasers HiPER Three main tasks demonstrate ignition and burn demonstrate high energy gain develop technology for an IFE power plant Ignition to be demonstrated at NIF (2010?) and LMJ lasers. The natural next step: HiPER. National Ignition Facility NIF is a culmination of long line of US Nd-glass laser systems Nova, OMEGA and NIF shot rates measured in shots/day.
    [Show full text]
  • Inertial Fusion Power Development:Path for Global Warming Suppression
    Inertial Fusion Power Development:Path for Global Warming Suppression EU:France, UK,etc. US: LLNL, SNL, U. Rochester East Asia: Japan, China,etc. Kunioki Mima Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University IAEA- FC 2008, 50 years’ Ann. of Fusion Res. , Oct.15, 2008, Geneva, SW Outline • Brief introduction and history of IFE research • Frontier of IFE researches Indirect driven ignition by NIF/LMJ Ignition equivalent experiments for fast ignition • IF reactor concept and road map toward power plant IFE concepts Several concepts have been explored in IFE. Driver Irradiation Ignition Laser Direct Central hot spark Ignition HIB Indirect Fast ignition Impact ignition Pulse power Shock ignition The key issue of IFE is implosion physics which has progressed for more than 30 years Producing 1000times solid density and 108 degree temperature plasmas Plasma instabilities R Irradiation non-uniformities Thermal transport and ablation surface of fuel pellet ΔR R-M Instability ΔR0 R-T instability R0 R Feed through R-M and R-T Instabilities in deceleration phase Turbulent Mixing Canter of fuel pellet t Major Laser Fusion Facilities in the World NIF, LLNL, US. LMJ, CESTA, Bordeaux, France SG-III, Menyang,CAEP, China GXII-FIREX, ILE, Osaka, Japan OMEGA-EP, LLE, Rochester, US HiPER, RAL, UK Heavy Ion Beam Fusion: The advanced T-lean fusion fuel reactor Test Stand at LBNL NDCX-I US HIF Science Virtual National Lab.(LBNL, LLNL,PPPL) has been established in 1990. (Directed by G Logan) • Implosion physics by HIB • HIB accelerator technology for 1kA, 1GeV, 1mm2 beam: Beam brightness, Neutralization, NDCX II Collective effects of high current beam, Stripping.(R.Davidson etal) • Reactor concept with Flibe liquid jet wall (R.Moir: HYLIF for HIF Reactor) History of IFE Research 1960: Laser innovation (Maiman) 1972: Implosion concept (J.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct-Drive Shock-Ignition for the Laser Megajoule
    Direct-Drive Shock-Ignition for the Laser Megajoule. B. Canaud∗, S. Laffite, V. Brandon CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France M. Temporal, R. Ramis ETSIA, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain (Dated: October 13, 2011) We present a review of direct-drive shock ignition studies done as alternative for the Laser Mega- Joule to achieve high thermonuclear gain. One-dimensional analysis of HiPER-like Shock-ignited target designs is presented. It is shown that high gain can be achieved with shock ignition for designs which do not ignite only from the laser compression. Shock ignition is achieved for different targets of the fast ignition family which are driven by an absorbed energy between 100 kJ and 850 kJ and deliver thermonuclear energies between 10-130 MJ. Shock-Ignition of Direct-Drive Double- Shell non-cryogenic target is also addressed. 2D results concerning the LMJ irradiation geometry are presented. Few systematic analyses are performed for the fuel assembly irradiation uniformity using the whole LMJ configuration or a part of the facility, and for the ignitor spike uniformity. Solutions for fuel assembly and shock ignition on LMJ using 2D calculations are presented. It is shown that high-gain shock-ignition is possible with intensity of each quad less than 1e15 W/cm2 but low modes asymmetries displace the ignitor power in the spike towards higher powers.. PACS numbers: 52.57.Bc, 52.57.-z,52.35.Tc,52.57.Kk I. INTRODUCTION Direct drive inertial fusion is an alternative to achieve inertial confinement fusion for the laser Megajoule (LMJ) for a decade [1{7].
    [Show full text]
  • ITER • NCSX • HEDLP Joint Program • Issues and Plans
    U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Fusion Energy Sciences Program Update Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Gaithersburg, MD October 23-24, 2007 Raymond J. Fonck Associate Director for Fusion Energy Sciences www.ofes.fusion.doe.gov FESAC 102307-rjf 1 Topics • Budget status • ITER • NCSX • HEDLP Joint Program • Issues and Plans Note: Thank You to all who worked so hard on the three reports presented at this meeting! FESAC 102307-rjf 2 FY 2008 Fusion Energy Sciences Congressional Budget Request ($ Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Actual Sept AFP CONG Science 148.7 144.6 159.6 Facility Operations 104.2 146.3 247.5 Enabling R&D 27.8 20.8 20.8 OFES Total 280.7 311.7 427.9 DIII-D 55.1 56.7 59.7 C-Mod 21.5 22.3 23.5 NSTX 34.2 33.5 36.1 NCSX 17.8 16.6 16.6 ITER 24.6 60.0 160.0 Non-ITER 256.1 251.7 267.9 FESAC 102307-rjf 3 FY 2008 Appropriations • House Mark – The Committee recommendation for fusion energy sciences is $427,850,000, the same as the budget request, and reflecting the $100,000,000 growth in the budget for ITER. – The Committee does not support funding for a new program in High Energy Density Physics (HEDP) and provides no funds for this research area. (Resources for HEDP should be redirected to other programs). – The Committee notes that major growth in support for ITER … is affecting the overall funding picture for Fusion Energy Sciences and for the Office of Science as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Results on Advanced Inertial Fusion Schemes Obtained
    NUKLEONIKA 2012;57(1):3−10 ORIGINAL PAPER Experimental results Dimitri Batani, Leonida A. Gizzi, Petra Koester, Luca Labate, on advanced inertial fusion Javier Honrubia, Luca Antonelli, Alessio Morace, Luca Volpe, Jorge J. Santos, Guy Schurtz, schemes obtained Sebastien Hulin, Xavier Ribeyre, Philippe Nicolai, Benjamin Vauzour, within the HiPER project Fabien Dorchies, Wiger Nazarov, John Pasley, Maria Richetta, Kate Lancaster, Christopher Spindloe, Martin Tolley, David Neely, Michaela Kozlová, Jaroslav Nejdl, Bedrich Rus, Jerzy Wołowski, Jan Badziak Abstract. This paper presents the results of experiments conducted within the Work Package 10 (fusion experimental programme) of the HiPER project. The aim of these experiments was to study the physics relevant for advanced ignition schemes for inertial confinement fusion, i.e. the fast ignition and the shock ignition. Such schemes allow to achieve a higher fusion gain compared to the indirect drive approach adopted in the National Ignition Facility in United States, which is important for the future inertial fusion energy reactors and for realising the inertial fusion with smaller facilities. Key words: advanced ignition schemes • fast ignition • shock ignition • inertial fusion • propagation of fast electrons • short-pulse ultra-high-intensity laser • shock compressed matter • cylindrical implosions Introduction D. Batani , J. J. Santos, G. Schurtz, S. Hulin, In 2006 the European Strategy Forum on Research X. Ribeyre, P. Nicolai, B. Vauzour, F. Dorchies Infrastructures (ESFRI) included the HiPER Project CELIA, Université de Bordeaux/CNRS/CEA, (European High Power Laser Energy Research Facility) Talence, 33405, France, in the European roadmap for Research Infrastructures. Tel.: +33 0 5 4000 3753, Fax: + 33 0 5 4000 2580, The goals of the HiPER project are to perform a feasi- E-mail: [email protected] bility study, choose a design and then construct a high- -energy laser facility for research on the production of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Fast Electron Energy Transport Into Laser-Compressed High-Density Fast-Ignition Targets
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 11 JANUARY 2016 | DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS3614 Visualizing fast electron energy transport into laser-compressed high-density fast-ignition targets L. C. Jarrott1†, M. S. Wei2*, C. McGuey1, A. A. Solodov3,4, W. Theobald3, B. Qiao1, C. Stoeckl3, R. Betti3,4, H. Chen5, J. Delettrez3, T. Döppner5, E. M. Giraldez2, V. Y. Glebov3, H. Habara6, T. Iwawaki6, M. H. Key5, R. W. Luo2, F. J. Marshall3, H. S. McLean5, C. Mileham3, P. K. Patel5, J. J. Santos7, H. Sawada8, R. B. Stephens2, T. Yabuuchi6 and F. N. Beg1* Recent progress in kilojoule-scale high-intensity lasers has opened up new areas of research in radiography, laboratory astrophysics, high-energy-density physics, and fast-ignition (FI) laser fusion. FI requires ecient heating of pre-compressed high-density fuel by an intense relativistic electron beam produced from laser–matter interaction. Understanding the details of electron beam generation and transport is crucial for FI. Here we report on the first visualization of fast electron spatial energy deposition in a laser-compressed cone-in-shell FI target, facilitated by doping the shell with copper and imaging the K-shell radiation. Multi-scale simulations accompanying the experiments clearly show the location of fast electrons and reveal key parameters aecting energy coupling. The approach provides a more direct way to infer energy coupling and guide experimental designs that significantly improve the laser-to-core coupling to 7%. Our findings lay the groundwork for further improving eciency, with 15% energy coupling predicted in FI experiments using an existing megajoule-scale laser driver. usion ignition and burn may be achieved through inertial its energy into the compressed core.
    [Show full text]
  • FCI in France Status and Perspective
    FCI in France status and perspective Thierry Massard Chief scientist CEA Defense and Security Guy Schurtz (CELIA), Benoit Canaud (CEA), Laurent Grémillet (CEA),Christine Labaune(CNRS) Fusion Power Associates – Washington DC – 1-2 December 2010 Outline • ICF in France : a long history of successes • ICF for energy : a place in the French energy vision ? • LMJ / PETAL a key facility for the IFE in Europe • How France scientific community participates in HiPER (European program for IFE faisability demoinstration) • The French strategy • A world wide forum is necessary for IFE ICF reserach in France was initiated at Ecole Polytechnique, In 1964 with the support of CEA-Limeil In 40 years, 5 national generations of lasers were commissioned, Rubis laser : CO2 laser : Nd laser : 2 beams-200 J – 600 ps (w, 2w, 4w) (1980) Nd laser : 6 beams – 600 J -600 ps (w, 2w, 4w) (1985-2002) Ti/Sa : 100 TW LULI2000 : 2 beams – 2 kJ – 1.5 ns (w, 2w, 3w) 1,00E+15 In 1968 the first fusion events are observed 1,00E+14 100TW Pico2000 1,00E+13 P(W) 1,00E+12 Nd-6F LULI2000 1,00E+11 Nd-1F 1,00E+10 1,00E+09 CO 2 1,00E+08 Rubis 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year C6 laser, delivering up to 600 J Today several critical laser facilities and labs in France • Ecole Polytechnique {LOA, LULI}, • CELIA (Bordeaux) • CEA (Bruyeres, Saclay and Bordeaux) • LCD/ENSMA fs ps ns 6 10 PW LMJ 10 5 LIL 4 10 PW / LIL Nano 2000 1000 ELI TW Pico 2000 Lucia : objectif : 100 J – 10 Hz 100 LULI 100TW Alise 10 LOA LIXAM (Alise) Energie [J] 1 LOA CEA/DSM GW 0,1 CELIA 0,01 0,01 0,1 1 10 100 1000
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Γ Rays Source and Nonlinear Breit-Wheeler Pairs in the Collision of High Density Particle Beams
    PHYSICAL REVIEW ACCELERATORS AND BEAMS 22, 023402 (2019) Bright γ rays source and nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pairs in the collision of high density particle beams † ‡ F. Del Gaudio,1,* T. Grismayer,1, R. A. Fonseca,1,2 W. B. Mori,3 and L. O. Silva1, 1GoLP/Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior T´ecnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal 2DCTI/ISCTE Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal 3Departments of Physics & Astronomy and of Electrical Engineering, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA (Received 13 April 2018; published 8 February 2019) The collision of ultrashort high-density e− or e− and eþ beams at 10s of GeV, to be available at the FACET II and in laser wakefield accelerator experiments, can produce highly collimated γ rays (few GeVs) with peak brilliance of 1027 ph=smm2 mrad20.1%BW and up to 105 nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pairs. We provide analytical estimates of the photon source properties and of the yield of secondary pairs, finding excellent agreement with full-scale 3D self-consistent particle-in-cell simulations that include quantum electrodynamics effects. Our results show that beam-beam collisions can be exploited as secondary sources of γ rays and provide an alternative to beam-laser setups to probe quantum electrodynamics effects at the Schwinger limit. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.023402 I. INTRODUCTION speed of light, e is the elementary charge and ℏ is the Planck constant. The classical regime is identified by χ ≪ 1, the full Colliders are a cornerstone of fundamental physics of quantum regime by χ ≫ 1 and the quantum transition paramount importance to probe the constituents of matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Sauter–Schwinger Effect with a Quantum Gas
    PAPER • OPEN ACCESS Sauter–Schwinger effect with a quantum gas To cite this article: A M Piñeiro et al 2019 New J. Phys. 21 083035 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 129.2.180.214 on 21/08/2019 at 18:49 New J. Phys. 21 (2019) 083035 https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab3840 PAPER Sauter–Schwinger effect with a quantum gas OPEN ACCESS A M Piñeiro , D Genkina, Mingwu Lu and I B Spielman RECEIVED Joint Quantum Institute, National Institute of Standards and Technology and University of Maryland, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, United 26 March 2019 States of America REVISED 18 July 2019 E-mail: [email protected] and [email protected] ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION Keywords: quantum gases, Sauter–Schwinger effect, particle creation, quantum simulation 2 August 2019 PUBLISHED 21 August 2019 Abstract Original content from this The creation of particle–antiparticle pairs from vacuum by a large electric field is at the core of work may be used under the terms of the Creative quantum electrodynamics. Despite the wide acceptance that this phenomenon occurs naturally when − Commons Attribution 3.0 18 1 electric field strengths exceed Ec≈10 Vm , it has yet to be experimentally observed due to the licence. fi Any further distribution of limitations imposed by producing electric elds at this scale. The high degree of experimental control this work must maintain present in ultracold atomic systems allow experimentalists to create laboratory analogs to high-field attribution to the author(s) and the title of phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonperturbative QED Vacuum Birefringence
    Prepared for submission to JHEP Nonperturbative QED vacuum birefringence V.I.Denisov E.E.Dolgaya and V.A.Sokolov Physics Department, Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: In this paper we represent nonperturbative calculation for one-loop Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) vacuum birefringence in presence of strong magnetic field. The dispersion relations for electromagnetic wave propagating in strong magnetic field point to retention of vacuum birefringence even in case when the field strength greatly exceeds Sauter-Schwinger limit. This gives a possibility to extend some predictions of perturbative QED such as electromagnetic waves delay in pulsars neighbourhood or wave polarization state changing (tested in PVLAS) to arbitrary magnetic field values. Such expansion is especially important in astrophysics because magnetic fields of some pulsars and magnetars greatly exceed quantum magnetic field limit, so the estimates of perturbative QED effects in this case require clarification. Keywords: QED vacuum birefringence, Electromagnetic processes in strong field, Non- perturbative effects arXiv:1612.09086v2 [hep-ph] 30 Dec 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Constitutive relations for nonperturbative QED 2 3 Electromagnetic wave propagation in strong magnetic field 4 4 QED vacuum birefringence extension on nonperturbative regime 6 5 Conclusion 9 1 Introduction From the very beginning, radiative corrections to the QED Lagrangian coming from the vacuum fluctuations have been the subject of a great interest. Such corrections, accounted on background of constant and homogeneous electromagnetic field, lead to Heisenberg- Euler effective Lagrangian [1]. The scale parameter for nonlinearities in Heisenberg-Euler electrodynamics (characteristic quantum electrodynamic induction or Schwinger limit for electric field) B = E = m2c3/e~ = 4.41 1013G distinguishes different regimes of the c c · theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Years of Fusion Research
    “50” Years of Fusion Research Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy® Princeton, NJ Independent Activities Period (IAP) January 19, 2011 MIT PSFC Cambridge, MA 02139 1 FiFusion Fi FiPre Powers th thSe Sun “We nee d to see if we can mak e f usi on work .” John Holdren @MIT, April, 2009 3 Toroidal Magg(netic Confinement (1940s-earlyy) 50s) • 1940s - first ideas on using a magnetic field to confine a hot plasma for fusion. • 1947 Sir G.P. Thomson and P. C. Thonemann began classified investigations of toroidal “pinch” RF discharge, eventually lead to ZETA, a large pinch at Harwell, England 1956. • 1949 Richter in Argentina issues Press Release proclaiming fusion, turns out to be bogus, but news piques Spitzer’s interest. • 1950 Spitzer conceives stellarator while on a ski lift, and makes ppproposal to AEC ($50k )-initiates Project Matterhorn at Princeton. • 1950s Classified US Program on Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion (Project Sherwood) carried out until 1958 when magnetic fusion research was declassified. US and others unveil results at 2nd UN Atoms for Peace Conference in Geneva 1958. Fusion Leading to 1958 Geneva Meeting • A period of rapid progress in science and technology – N-weapons, N-submarine, Fission energy, Sputnik, transistor, .... • Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion had great potential – Much optimism in the early 1950s with expectation for a quick solution – Political support and pressure for quick results (but bud gets were low, $56M for 1951-1958) – Many very “innovative” approaches were put forward. – Early fusion reactor concepts - Tamm/Sakharov, Spitzer (Model D) very large. • Reality began to set in by the mid 1950s – Coll ectiv e eff ects - MHD instability ( 195 4), Bo hm d iffus io n was ubi qui tous – Meager plasma physics understanding led to trial and error approaches – A multitude of experiments were tried and ended up far from fusion conditions – Magnetic Fusion research in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • ITER - Wikipedia 1 of 23
    ITER - Wikipedia 1 of 23 Coordinates: 43.70831°N 5.77741°E ITER ITER (originally the International ITER Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor[1]) is an international nuclear fusion research and engineering megaproject, which will be the world's largest magnetic confinement plasma physics experiment. It is an experimental tokamak nuclear fusion reactor that is being built next to the Cadarache facility in Saint-Paul-lès-Durance, in Provence, southern France.[2] The ITER thermonuclear fusion reactor has been designed to produce a fusion plasma equivalent to 500 megawatts (MW) of thermal output power for around twenty minutes while 50 megawatts of Thirty-five participating nations thermal power are injected into the tokamak, Formation 24 October 2007 resulting in a ten-fold gain of plasma heating power.[3] Thereby the machine aims to demonstrate Headquarters Saint-Paul-lès- the principle of producing more thermal power from Durance, France the fusion process than is used to heat the plasma, Director- Bernard Bigot something that has not yet been achieved in any General fusion reactor. The total electricity consumed by the Website www.iter.org (https:// reactor and facilities will range from 110 MW up to www.iter.org/) 620 MW peak for 30-second periods during plasma operation.[4] Thermal-to-electric conversion is not ITER included in the design because ITER will not produce sufficient power for net electrical production. The emitted heat from the fusion reaction will be vented to the atmosphere.[5][6] The project is funded and run by seven member entities—the European Union, India, Japan, China, Russia, South Korea and the United States.
    [Show full text]