Petawatt Class Lasers Worldwide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Petawatt Class Lasers Worldwide High Power Laser Science and Engineering, (2015), Vol. 3, e3, 14 pages. © The Author(s) 2015. The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/>. doi:10.1017/hpl.2014.52 Petawatt class lasers worldwide Colin Danson1, David Hillier1, Nicholas Hopps1, and David Neely2 1AWE, Aldermaston, Reading RG7 4PR, UK 2STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 0QX, UK (Received 12 September 2014; revised 26 November 2014; accepted 5 December 2014) Abstract The use of ultra-high intensity laser beams to achieve extreme material states in the laboratory has become almost routine with the development of the petawatt laser. Petawatt class lasers have been constructed for specific research activities, including particle acceleration, inertial confinement fusion and radiation therapy, and for secondary source generation (x-rays, electrons, protons, neutrons and ions). They are also now routinely coupled, and synchronized, to other large scale facilities including megajoule scale lasers, ion and electron accelerators, x-ray sources and z-pinches. The authors of this paper have tried to compile a comprehensive overview of the current status of petawatt class lasers worldwide. The definition of ‘petawatt class’ in this context is a laser that delivers >200 TW. Keywords: diode pumped; high intensity; high power lasers; megajoule; petawatt lasers 1. Motivation of instabilities and perturbations on timescales where hydrodynamic motion is small during the laser pulse The last published review of high power lasers was con- (τcs λ, where cs is the sound speed of the plasma, ducted by Backus et al.[1] in 1998. At this time there τ is the laser pulse length and λ is the laser wavelength) was only one petawatt class laser, the NOVA petawatt[2], pushed the development of lasers with pulse durations τ in existence. The field has moved on a long way since of less than tens of picoseconds. The development and then with over 50 petawatt class lasers currently operational, delivery of chirped pulse amplification (CPA)[10] in large under construction or in the planning phase. The possibility aperture laser systems enabled a rapid push towards even of using focused high intensity laser beams to achieve shorter pulses (from picoseconds to attoseconds) and higher previously unobtainable states of matter in the laboratory intensities, where relativistic and field effects associated with gained much attention after the demonstration of the first the laser pulse dominate the interaction physics[11]. Under- pulsed laser[3] in 1960. Potential applications, such as standing and learning to control and manipulate the complex generating the conditions for fusion in the laboratory, be- interactions taking place at the laser/matter interface led to a came a major driver for the early development of high power wide variety of experiments and potential new scientific[12] lasers in the 1960s to 1980s. It was realized that although and industrial applications being pursued and necessitating matter could be heated[4] to hundreds of electron volts using the development of matching laser capability, some of which ∼ns pulses and directly compressed using light pressure are outlined below. (∼I/c, where I is the intensity and c is the speed of light), The production of quasi-coherent VUV/soft x-ray sources spherical compression using laser driven ablation could for biological imaging or plasma probing was investigated achieve much higher pressures and densities[5], suitable for using ‘recombination pumping[13]’ where, after heating a the achievement of fusion conditions[6]. First estimates plasma, it was allowed to expand, usually into vacuum, and for laser driven fusion[7] proposed lasers delivering 20 ns rapidly recombine, ideally creating a population inversion shaped pulses of megajoule energies, operating at 100 Hz, in an ionized state such a hydrogen-like carbon[14].To eventually leading today to megajoule scale projects such as achieve higher gain[15], shorter duration laser pulses were NIF[8] and LMJ[9]. required, and by 1995, high power ∼terawatt pulses of The potential to interact with hot plasmas (greater ∼20 ps duration had been developed. Collisional excitation than hundreds of electron volts) and probe the growth soft x-ray laser pumping using high (∼kilojoule) energy, Correspondence to: C. Danson, AWE, Aldermaston, Reading RG7 4PR, nanosecond pulses was first demonstrated at high gain with UK. Email: [email protected] neon-like selenium[16] and subsequently and more efficiently 1 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. 30 Sep 2021 at 22:12:47, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use. 2 C. Danson et al. in neon-like germanium[17]. The highest possible brightness has attracted a significant amount of research effort since the with a soft x-ray laser is obtained when it is operated in turn of the century. ‘Target normal sheath acceleration’ using saturation, and this was initially achieved in 1992 using a petawatt class picosecond laser[45] was used to accelerate neon-like germanium[18] at 23 nm with a 500 ps pump, a population of electrons through a metallic foil, creating and later in 1997 with nickel-like samarium[19] at 7 nm a large sheath field on the rear side which resulted in a using a 50 ps pump. To improve the efficiency of these highly laminar ion beam containing large fluxes (>1013)of devices[20], shorter pulse pumping using a mode of operation high energy (>10 MeV) ions. In subsequent experiments termed ‘transient collisional excitation’ helped to push the using tens of terawatt drivers, it was demonstrated that development of shorter pulse laser drivers. High transient improved efficiency could be achieved by reusing the laser collisional excitation gain was demonstrated using an 800 ps driven electrons[46] as they bounce back and forth in the foil low energy pulse to pre-form a large plasma volume and then target, termed ‘recirculation’. As electron recirculation[47] a 5 J ps pump to generate the transient collisional excitation experiments pushed to thinner and thinner targets (<50 nm − to deliver gain at 14.7 nm[21] in nickel-like palladium. thick foils by ∼2007) at intensities of >1019 Wcm 2, laser The generation of quasi-coherent VUV/soft x-ray sources system contrasts of >109 were routinely required. Currently, using high harmonics[22] rather than soft x-ray lasers was the new contrast enhancing techniques described earlier will given a significant boost in the mid-1990s by the observation need to used in combination with enhanced picosecond of the 68th harmonic of a 1.05 μm driving laser at 15.5 nm, cleaning schemes to achieve picosecond intensity contrasts using a 2.5 ps pulse focused to an intensity of 1019 Wcm−2 of >1011, which are essential to explore new mechanisms[48] > 21 −2 on a solid target[23]. This was extended into the keV of ion acceleration at intensities of 10 Wcm . regime using petawatt power pulses focused to 1021 Wcm−2 intensities[24] by 2007, and into the attosecond region[25] 2. The road to petawatt class lasers using even shorter few femtosecond optical driving pulses. The production of high currents of MeV electrons[26] and From the first demonstration of the laser, attempts have associated gamma-ray production[27] brought significant been made to increase the peak power and focused intensity attention to the scale length of the interaction. At such in order to reach extreme conditions within the laboratory. intensities, any illumination of the target above the ionization Initial jumps in peak power came with the invention of threshold (1011–1012 Wcm−2) can generate a pre-plasma Q-switching then mode locking, but progress slowed until which expands and dramatically changes the scale length the late 1980s and the dawn of CPA. The original use of of the interaction. The ability to control the scale length of CPA was in radar systems where short, powerful pulses that were beyond the capabilities of existing electrical circuits the interaction[28] led to significant effort in improving the were needed. By stretching and amplifying the pulses prior laser contrast and developing pre-pulse mitigation strategies to transmission, then compressing the reflected pulse, high (frequency doubling of high power short pulses[29, 30]; peak powers within the amplifier circuitry could be avoided. [31] [32] plasma mirrors ; saturable absorbers ; XPW tech- These ideas were first applied in a laser amplification [33] [34] [35] niques ; low gain OPA ; short pulse OPA ). scheme at the Laboratory for Laser Energetics at the The concept of using the electric field associated with a University of Rochester, USA by Strickland and Mourou[10]. laser driven plasma wave to accelerate electrons was given Here, the output from a mode-locked Nd:YAG oscillator a major boost in the late 1970s when it was realized that was stretched and spectrally broadened by 1.4 km of [36] GeV/cm fields could be potentially achieved . Subsequent optical fibre, amplified in a Nd:YAG regenerative amplifier work utilizing the then available lasers investigated exci- then compressed using a Treacy grating pair[49] which [37] tation of instabilities and driving of the plasma at two compensated for the second order spectral phase imposed different wavelengths using either 2 ns pulses from a carbon by the fibre. dioxide based laser[38] or Nd:glass lasers[39] to generate Due to the limitations of mode-locked lasers operating suitable beat-wave plasma modulations. By the mid 1990s, at 1064 nm, early high power/energy CPA lasers[50–53] all wave-breaking[40] generated electron beams with thermal- relied on the use of self-phase modulation to generate enough like spectra up to 45 MeV using a 25 TW picosecond driver bandwidth to support sub-few-picosecond pulses[54].
Recommended publications
  • Concept for Cryogenic Kj-Class Yb:YAG Amplifier K
    OSA / ASSP/LACSEA/LS&C 2010 AWB20.pdf a288_1.pdf Concept for Cryogenic kJ-Class Yb:YAG Amplifier K. Ertel, C. Hernandez-Gomez, P. D. Mason, I. O. Musgrave, I. N. Ross, J. L. Collier STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Central Laser Facility, Chilton, Didcot, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom [email protected] Abstract: More and more projects and applications require the development of ns, kJ-class DPSSL systems with multi-Hz repetition rate. We present an amplifier concept based on cryogenically cooled Yb:YAG, promising high optical-to-optical efficiency and high gain. ©2010 Optical Society of America OCIS codes: (140.3280) Laser amplifiers; (140.3480) Lasers, diode-pumped, (140.3615) Lasers, ytterbium, (140.5560) Pumping 1. Introduction Currently, most lasers for producing multi-J to multi-kJ ns pulses are based on flashlamp pumped Nd:glass technology. These lasers show very poor electrical-to-optical (e-o) efficiency and can only be operated at very low repetition rates (few shots per minute to few shots per day, depending on size). A new approach is required to overcome these limitations in order to advance fundamental laser-plasma research and to enable envisioned real world applications such as laser driven particle accelerators and inertial fusion energy (IFE) production. Two multi-national laser research projects have been started in Europe. The first is ELI [1], focussed on ultra- short pulse laser research and applications, and the second is HiPER [2], focussed on IFE research. Both projects require the development of kJ-class ns-lasers operating at high e-o efficiency and at repetition rates around 10 Hz.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe for Inertial Confinement Fusion
    EuropeEurope forfor InertialInertial ConfinementConfinement FusionFusion Technology Watch Workshop on IFE-KIT Madrid March 22, 2010 Jiri Ullschmied Association EURATOM IPP.CR PALS Research Centre, a joint laboratory of the Institute of Physics and Institute of Plasma Physics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic www.pals.cas.cz Paper Layout State of the art - where are we now Lasers on the path to fusion National Ignition Facility Indirect drive / direct drive European lasers, LMJ Coordinated European effort in the laser research Various ignition scenarios - EU KIT contributions SWOT Summary State of the art - where are we now Steadily increasing progress in laser technology since 1960, lasers becoming the most dynamic field of physical research in the last decade. Megajoule and multi-PW lasers have become reality, laser beam focused intensity has been increased up to 1022 W/cm2 (Astra, UK). Last-generation high-power lasers - an unmatched tool for high-energy density physical research and potential fusion drivers. High-energy lasers worldwide Lasers on the path to Fusion Max output energy of single beam systems (Nd-glass, iodine, KrF) in the 1-10 kJ range, while EL > 1 MJ is needed for central ignition => multi-beam laser systems. Various fast ignition schemes are have been proposed, which should decrease the required energy by an order of magnitude. History and future of IFE lasers HiPER Three main tasks demonstrate ignition and burn demonstrate high energy gain develop technology for an IFE power plant Ignition to be demonstrated at NIF (2010?) and LMJ lasers. The natural next step: HiPER. National Ignition Facility NIF is a culmination of long line of US Nd-glass laser systems Nova, OMEGA and NIF shot rates measured in shots/day.
    [Show full text]
  • Inertial Fusion Power Development:Path for Global Warming Suppression
    Inertial Fusion Power Development:Path for Global Warming Suppression EU:France, UK,etc. US: LLNL, SNL, U. Rochester East Asia: Japan, China,etc. Kunioki Mima Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University IAEA- FC 2008, 50 years’ Ann. of Fusion Res. , Oct.15, 2008, Geneva, SW Outline • Brief introduction and history of IFE research • Frontier of IFE researches Indirect driven ignition by NIF/LMJ Ignition equivalent experiments for fast ignition • IF reactor concept and road map toward power plant IFE concepts Several concepts have been explored in IFE. Driver Irradiation Ignition Laser Direct Central hot spark Ignition HIB Indirect Fast ignition Impact ignition Pulse power Shock ignition The key issue of IFE is implosion physics which has progressed for more than 30 years Producing 1000times solid density and 108 degree temperature plasmas Plasma instabilities R Irradiation non-uniformities Thermal transport and ablation surface of fuel pellet ΔR R-M Instability ΔR0 R-T instability R0 R Feed through R-M and R-T Instabilities in deceleration phase Turbulent Mixing Canter of fuel pellet t Major Laser Fusion Facilities in the World NIF, LLNL, US. LMJ, CESTA, Bordeaux, France SG-III, Menyang,CAEP, China GXII-FIREX, ILE, Osaka, Japan OMEGA-EP, LLE, Rochester, US HiPER, RAL, UK Heavy Ion Beam Fusion: The advanced T-lean fusion fuel reactor Test Stand at LBNL NDCX-I US HIF Science Virtual National Lab.(LBNL, LLNL,PPPL) has been established in 1990. (Directed by G Logan) • Implosion physics by HIB • HIB accelerator technology for 1kA, 1GeV, 1mm2 beam: Beam brightness, Neutralization, NDCX II Collective effects of high current beam, Stripping.(R.Davidson etal) • Reactor concept with Flibe liquid jet wall (R.Moir: HYLIF for HIF Reactor) History of IFE Research 1960: Laser innovation (Maiman) 1972: Implosion concept (J.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct-Drive Shock-Ignition for the Laser Megajoule
    Direct-Drive Shock-Ignition for the Laser Megajoule. B. Canaud∗, S. Laffite, V. Brandon CEA, DAM, DIF, F-91297 Arpajon, France M. Temporal, R. Ramis ETSIA, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, Spain (Dated: October 13, 2011) We present a review of direct-drive shock ignition studies done as alternative for the Laser Mega- Joule to achieve high thermonuclear gain. One-dimensional analysis of HiPER-like Shock-ignited target designs is presented. It is shown that high gain can be achieved with shock ignition for designs which do not ignite only from the laser compression. Shock ignition is achieved for different targets of the fast ignition family which are driven by an absorbed energy between 100 kJ and 850 kJ and deliver thermonuclear energies between 10-130 MJ. Shock-Ignition of Direct-Drive Double- Shell non-cryogenic target is also addressed. 2D results concerning the LMJ irradiation geometry are presented. Few systematic analyses are performed for the fuel assembly irradiation uniformity using the whole LMJ configuration or a part of the facility, and for the ignitor spike uniformity. Solutions for fuel assembly and shock ignition on LMJ using 2D calculations are presented. It is shown that high-gain shock-ignition is possible with intensity of each quad less than 1e15 W/cm2 but low modes asymmetries displace the ignitor power in the spike towards higher powers.. PACS numbers: 52.57.Bc, 52.57.-z,52.35.Tc,52.57.Kk I. INTRODUCTION Direct drive inertial fusion is an alternative to achieve inertial confinement fusion for the laser Megajoule (LMJ) for a decade [1{7].
    [Show full text]
  • ITER • NCSX • HEDLP Joint Program • Issues and Plans
    U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science Fusion Energy Sciences Program Update Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Gaithersburg, MD October 23-24, 2007 Raymond J. Fonck Associate Director for Fusion Energy Sciences www.ofes.fusion.doe.gov FESAC 102307-rjf 1 Topics • Budget status • ITER • NCSX • HEDLP Joint Program • Issues and Plans Note: Thank You to all who worked so hard on the three reports presented at this meeting! FESAC 102307-rjf 2 FY 2008 Fusion Energy Sciences Congressional Budget Request ($ Millions) FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 Actual Sept AFP CONG Science 148.7 144.6 159.6 Facility Operations 104.2 146.3 247.5 Enabling R&D 27.8 20.8 20.8 OFES Total 280.7 311.7 427.9 DIII-D 55.1 56.7 59.7 C-Mod 21.5 22.3 23.5 NSTX 34.2 33.5 36.1 NCSX 17.8 16.6 16.6 ITER 24.6 60.0 160.0 Non-ITER 256.1 251.7 267.9 FESAC 102307-rjf 3 FY 2008 Appropriations • House Mark – The Committee recommendation for fusion energy sciences is $427,850,000, the same as the budget request, and reflecting the $100,000,000 growth in the budget for ITER. – The Committee does not support funding for a new program in High Energy Density Physics (HEDP) and provides no funds for this research area. (Resources for HEDP should be redirected to other programs). – The Committee notes that major growth in support for ITER … is affecting the overall funding picture for Fusion Energy Sciences and for the Office of Science as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Results on Advanced Inertial Fusion Schemes Obtained
    NUKLEONIKA 2012;57(1):3−10 ORIGINAL PAPER Experimental results Dimitri Batani, Leonida A. Gizzi, Petra Koester, Luca Labate, on advanced inertial fusion Javier Honrubia, Luca Antonelli, Alessio Morace, Luca Volpe, Jorge J. Santos, Guy Schurtz, schemes obtained Sebastien Hulin, Xavier Ribeyre, Philippe Nicolai, Benjamin Vauzour, within the HiPER project Fabien Dorchies, Wiger Nazarov, John Pasley, Maria Richetta, Kate Lancaster, Christopher Spindloe, Martin Tolley, David Neely, Michaela Kozlová, Jaroslav Nejdl, Bedrich Rus, Jerzy Wołowski, Jan Badziak Abstract. This paper presents the results of experiments conducted within the Work Package 10 (fusion experimental programme) of the HiPER project. The aim of these experiments was to study the physics relevant for advanced ignition schemes for inertial confinement fusion, i.e. the fast ignition and the shock ignition. Such schemes allow to achieve a higher fusion gain compared to the indirect drive approach adopted in the National Ignition Facility in United States, which is important for the future inertial fusion energy reactors and for realising the inertial fusion with smaller facilities. Key words: advanced ignition schemes • fast ignition • shock ignition • inertial fusion • propagation of fast electrons • short-pulse ultra-high-intensity laser • shock compressed matter • cylindrical implosions Introduction D. Batani , J. J. Santos, G. Schurtz, S. Hulin, In 2006 the European Strategy Forum on Research X. Ribeyre, P. Nicolai, B. Vauzour, F. Dorchies Infrastructures (ESFRI) included the HiPER Project CELIA, Université de Bordeaux/CNRS/CEA, (European High Power Laser Energy Research Facility) Talence, 33405, France, in the European roadmap for Research Infrastructures. Tel.: +33 0 5 4000 3753, Fax: + 33 0 5 4000 2580, The goals of the HiPER project are to perform a feasi- E-mail: [email protected] bility study, choose a design and then construct a high- -energy laser facility for research on the production of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Fast Electron Energy Transport Into Laser-Compressed High-Density Fast-Ignition Targets
    ARTICLES PUBLISHED ONLINE: 11 JANUARY 2016 | DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS3614 Visualizing fast electron energy transport into laser-compressed high-density fast-ignition targets L. C. Jarrott1†, M. S. Wei2*, C. McGuey1, A. A. Solodov3,4, W. Theobald3, B. Qiao1, C. Stoeckl3, R. Betti3,4, H. Chen5, J. Delettrez3, T. Döppner5, E. M. Giraldez2, V. Y. Glebov3, H. Habara6, T. Iwawaki6, M. H. Key5, R. W. Luo2, F. J. Marshall3, H. S. McLean5, C. Mileham3, P. K. Patel5, J. J. Santos7, H. Sawada8, R. B. Stephens2, T. Yabuuchi6 and F. N. Beg1* Recent progress in kilojoule-scale high-intensity lasers has opened up new areas of research in radiography, laboratory astrophysics, high-energy-density physics, and fast-ignition (FI) laser fusion. FI requires ecient heating of pre-compressed high-density fuel by an intense relativistic electron beam produced from laser–matter interaction. Understanding the details of electron beam generation and transport is crucial for FI. Here we report on the first visualization of fast electron spatial energy deposition in a laser-compressed cone-in-shell FI target, facilitated by doping the shell with copper and imaging the K-shell radiation. Multi-scale simulations accompanying the experiments clearly show the location of fast electrons and reveal key parameters aecting energy coupling. The approach provides a more direct way to infer energy coupling and guide experimental designs that significantly improve the laser-to-core coupling to 7%. Our findings lay the groundwork for further improving eciency, with 15% energy coupling predicted in FI experiments using an existing megajoule-scale laser driver. usion ignition and burn may be achieved through inertial its energy into the compressed core.
    [Show full text]
  • FCI in France Status and Perspective
    FCI in France status and perspective Thierry Massard Chief scientist CEA Defense and Security Guy Schurtz (CELIA), Benoit Canaud (CEA), Laurent Grémillet (CEA),Christine Labaune(CNRS) Fusion Power Associates – Washington DC – 1-2 December 2010 Outline • ICF in France : a long history of successes • ICF for energy : a place in the French energy vision ? • LMJ / PETAL a key facility for the IFE in Europe • How France scientific community participates in HiPER (European program for IFE faisability demoinstration) • The French strategy • A world wide forum is necessary for IFE ICF reserach in France was initiated at Ecole Polytechnique, In 1964 with the support of CEA-Limeil In 40 years, 5 national generations of lasers were commissioned, Rubis laser : CO2 laser : Nd laser : 2 beams-200 J – 600 ps (w, 2w, 4w) (1980) Nd laser : 6 beams – 600 J -600 ps (w, 2w, 4w) (1985-2002) Ti/Sa : 100 TW LULI2000 : 2 beams – 2 kJ – 1.5 ns (w, 2w, 3w) 1,00E+15 In 1968 the first fusion events are observed 1,00E+14 100TW Pico2000 1,00E+13 P(W) 1,00E+12 Nd-6F LULI2000 1,00E+11 Nd-1F 1,00E+10 1,00E+09 CO 2 1,00E+08 Rubis 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Year C6 laser, delivering up to 600 J Today several critical laser facilities and labs in France • Ecole Polytechnique {LOA, LULI}, • CELIA (Bordeaux) • CEA (Bruyeres, Saclay and Bordeaux) • LCD/ENSMA fs ps ns 6 10 PW LMJ 10 5 LIL 4 10 PW / LIL Nano 2000 1000 ELI TW Pico 2000 Lucia : objectif : 100 J – 10 Hz 100 LULI 100TW Alise 10 LOA LIXAM (Alise) Energie [J] 1 LOA CEA/DSM GW 0,1 CELIA 0,01 0,01 0,1 1 10 100 1000
    [Show full text]
  • High Performance Computing Tera 10: Beyond 50 Thousand Billion Operations Per Second
    JUNE 2006 - SPECIAL ISSUE IN PARTNERSHIP WITH BULL AND INTEL High Performance Computing Tera 10: beyond 50 thousand billion operations per second Editorial The lightning growth of intensive computing oday, researchers, engineers an architecture promising a million they will require a 100 to 10,000- and entrepreneurs in vir- operations a second for a cost of just fold increase in computing capacity Ttually every field are finding a million dollars. Thirty years on within the next 10-20 years. that high-performance computing – with the advances in electronic In this frenetic race, there is general (HPC) is starting to play a central circuit technology and the science agreement that France has not pro- role in maintaining their competi- of computer simulation – a mil- gressed as fast as we would have wan- tive edge: in research and business lion times that processing power is ted over the past few years. In order activities alike. now available for an equivalent cost. to be effective and consistent, it is Advances in scientific research Today’s most powerful machine deli- not enough just to give the scientific have always depended on the link vers 280 teraflops, and there are plans community the most powerful com- between experimental and theore- in the near future for a 1 petaflop puters. Active support for research tical work. The emergence of the machine in China and a 5 petaflop and higher education into algorithms supercomputer opened up a whole machine in Japan. and the associated computer sciences new avenue: high-powered compu- Where will this progress lead us? is also essential.
    [Show full text]
  • Nd Lu Caf2 for High-Energy Lasers Simone Normani
    Nd Lu CaF2 for high-energy lasers Simone Normani To cite this version: Simone Normani. Nd Lu CaF2 for high-energy lasers. Physics [physics]. Normandie Université, 2017. English. NNT : 2017NORMC230. tel-01689866 HAL Id: tel-01689866 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01689866 Submitted on 22 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. THESE Pour obtenir le diplôme de doctorat Physique Préparée au sein de l’Université de Caen Normandie Nd:Lu:CaF2 for High-Energy Lasers Étude de Cristaux de CaF2:Nd:Lu pour Lasers de Haute Énergie Présentée et soutenue par Simone NORMANI Thèse soutenue publiquement le 19 octobre 2017 devant le jury composé de M. Patrice CAMY Professeur, Université de Caen Normandie Directeur de thèse M. Alain BRAUD MCF HDR, Université de Caen Normandie Codirecteur de thèse M. Jean-Luc ADAM Directeur de Recherche, CNRS Rapporteur Mme. Patricia SEGONDS Professeur, Université de Grenoble Rapporteur M. Jean-Paul GOOSSENS Ingénieur, CEA Examinateur M. Maurizio FERRARI Directeur de Recherche, CNR-IFN Examinateur Thèse dirigée par Patrice CAMY et Alain BRAUD, laboratoire CIMAP Université de Caen Normandie Nd:Lu:CaF2 for High-Energy Lasers Thesis for the Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Dermatology
    Laser Dermatology David J. Goldberg Editor Laser Dermatology Second Edition Editor David J. Goldberg, M.D. Division of New York & New Jersey Skin Laser & Surgery Specialists Hackensack , NY USA ISBN 978-3-642-32005-7 ISBN 978-3-642-32006-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-32006-4 Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012954390 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, speci fi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on micro fi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied speci fi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a speci fi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Years of Fusion Research
    “50” Years of Fusion Research Dale Meade Fusion Innovation Research and Energy® Princeton, NJ Independent Activities Period (IAP) January 19, 2011 MIT PSFC Cambridge, MA 02139 1 FiFusion Fi FiPre Powers th thSe Sun “We nee d to see if we can mak e f usi on work .” John Holdren @MIT, April, 2009 3 Toroidal Magg(netic Confinement (1940s-earlyy) 50s) • 1940s - first ideas on using a magnetic field to confine a hot plasma for fusion. • 1947 Sir G.P. Thomson and P. C. Thonemann began classified investigations of toroidal “pinch” RF discharge, eventually lead to ZETA, a large pinch at Harwell, England 1956. • 1949 Richter in Argentina issues Press Release proclaiming fusion, turns out to be bogus, but news piques Spitzer’s interest. • 1950 Spitzer conceives stellarator while on a ski lift, and makes ppproposal to AEC ($50k )-initiates Project Matterhorn at Princeton. • 1950s Classified US Program on Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion (Project Sherwood) carried out until 1958 when magnetic fusion research was declassified. US and others unveil results at 2nd UN Atoms for Peace Conference in Geneva 1958. Fusion Leading to 1958 Geneva Meeting • A period of rapid progress in science and technology – N-weapons, N-submarine, Fission energy, Sputnik, transistor, .... • Controlled Thermonuclear Fusion had great potential – Much optimism in the early 1950s with expectation for a quick solution – Political support and pressure for quick results (but bud gets were low, $56M for 1951-1958) – Many very “innovative” approaches were put forward. – Early fusion reactor concepts - Tamm/Sakharov, Spitzer (Model D) very large. • Reality began to set in by the mid 1950s – Coll ectiv e eff ects - MHD instability ( 195 4), Bo hm d iffus io n was ubi qui tous – Meager plasma physics understanding led to trial and error approaches – A multitude of experiments were tried and ended up far from fusion conditions – Magnetic Fusion research in the U.S.
    [Show full text]