DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resource Summary for Big Thicket National Preserve (BITH) Final Report December 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Resource Summary for Big Thicket National Preserve (BITH) Final Report December 2004 Natural Resource Summary for Big Thicket National Preserve (BITH) Final Report December 2004 Prepared by Robert J. Cooper Sandra B. Cederbaum and Jill J. Gannon Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia Athens, GA TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................ I LIST OF FIGURES..................................................................................................................................................III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... IV RESEARCH REVIEWS .............................................................................................................................................1 NATURAL RESOURCES .....................................................................................................................................2 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES...............................................................................................................................3 VEGETATION ........................................................................................................................................................3 Big Thicket region ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 Big Thicket National Park................................................................................................................................................. 4 General plant community surveys, studies................................................................................................................... 4 General vegetation surveys.......................................................................................................................................... 6 Species surveys, studies ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Pines ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Bryophytes ............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Bromeliads ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Fungi ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Lichens ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Pitcher Plants.......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Other....................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Individual Unit Surveys and Studies............................................................................................................................... 10 Beaumont Unit........................................................................................................................................................... 10 Big Sandy Creek and Menard Creek Units................................................................................................................ 10 Loblolly Unit.............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Beech Creek Unit....................................................................................................................................................... 11 Hickory Creek Unit.................................................................................................................................................... 11 Turkey Creek Unit...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Jack Gore Baygall-Neches Bottom, and Upper and Lower Neches Corridor Units .................................................. 12 Lance Rosier Unit and Pine Island Bayou-Little Pine Island Bayou Corridor Unit.................................................. 13 MAMMALS ..........................................................................................................................................................14 Summary reports............................................................................................................................................................. 14 General surveys, studies.................................................................................................................................................. 15 Game species surveys, studies ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Non-game species surveys, studies ................................................................................................................................. 16 HERPETOFAUNA.................................................................................................................................................16 Summary reports............................................................................................................................................................. 16 General surveys, studies.................................................................................................................................................. 17 Species surveys, studies .................................................................................................................................................. 18 BIRDS .................................................................................................................................................................18 Summary reports............................................................................................................................................................. 18 General surveys, studies.................................................................................................................................................. 19 Individual unit surveys.................................................................................................................................................... 20 Species surveys, studies .................................................................................................................................................. 20 FISH ...................................................................................................................................................................22 Summary reports............................................................................................................................................................. 22 General surveys, studies.................................................................................................................................................. 22 Individual unit surveys.................................................................................................................................................... 23 INVERTEBRATES .................................................................................................................................................24 Summary reports............................................................................................................................................................. 24 Terrestrial Invertebrates .................................................................................................................................................. 25 General surveys, studies ............................................................................................................................................ 25 Species surveys, studies ............................................................................................................................................. 25 Aquatic Invertebrates...................................................................................................................................................... 27 General surveys, studies ............................................................................................................................................ 27 Water quality studies, general .............................................................................................................................. 27 Water quality studies, individual units/waterways ............................................................................................... 28 i Species surveys, studies ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evolution of the Brazilian Phytogeography Classification Systems: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation
    Ciência e Cultura 51(5/6): 331-348, 1999. Evolution of the Brazilian phytogeography classification systems: implications for biodiversity conservation. JOLY, C.A.1; AIDAR, M.P.M.2;KLINK, C.A.3; McGRATH, D.G.4,5; MOREIRA, A. G.6; MOUTINHO, P.5; NEPSTAD, D.C.5,7; OLIVEIRA, A. A.8; POTT, A.9; RODAL, M.J.N.10 & SAMPAIO, E.V.S.B.11 1 Depto. Botânica, IB, UNICAMP, CP 6109, 13083-970, Campinas, SP (mailto:[email protected]) 2 Seção de Fisiologia e Bioquímica de Plantas, Instituto de Botânica, CP 4005, 01061-970, São Paulo, SP ([email protected])([email protected]) 3 Depto. de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasilia, C.P. 04631, 70919-970, Brasilia, DF. ([email protected]) 4 Núcleo de Altos Estudos Amazônicos, UFPa, Campus Guamá, 66075-970, Belém, PA. 5 Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, Trav. Enéias Pinheiro, 1426, Marco, 66095-100 Belém, PA. ([email protected])([email protected]) 6The Woods Hole Research Center &Instituto de Pesquisa Ambiental da Amazônia, SCLN 210, bloco C, sala 209, 70865-530, Brasilia, DF ([email protected]) 7The Woods Hole Research Center, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA. 8Universidade de São Paulo, USP, Instituto de Biociências, Ecologia. Rua Matão 321, trav. 14.05008-900. São Paulo, SP. 9Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Pantanal, EMBRAPA, R. 21 de Setembro, 1880 , 79.320-900, Corumbá, MS (mailto:[email protected]) 10Departamento de Energia Nuclear, UFPE, Av. Prof. Luís Freire 1000, 50740-540, Recife, PE ([email protected]) 11Departamento de Biologia, UFRPE, R.
    [Show full text]
  • BA Steinhagen Lake
    Volumetric and Sedimentation Survey of B.A. STEINHAGEN LAKE October 2011 Survey August 2014 Texas Water Development Board Carlos Rubinstein, Chairman | Bech Bruun, Member | Kathleen Jackson, Member Kevin Patteson, Executive Administrator Prepared for: Lower Neches Valley Authority With Support Provided by: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District Authorization for use or reproduction ofany original material contained in thispublication, i.e. not obtained from other sources, is freely granted. TheBoard would appreciate acknowledgement. This report was prepared by staff ofthe Surface Water Resources Division: Ruben S. Solis, Ph.D., P.E. Jason J. Kemp, Team Lead Tony Connell Holly Holmquist Nathan Brock Khan Iqbal Bianca Whitaker Xh * YA Published and distributed by the Texas Water (^ Development Board P.O. Box 13231, Austin, TX 78711-3231 Executive summary In October 2011, the Texas Water Development Board entered into agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, to perform a volumetric and sedimentation survey of B.A. Steinhagen Lake. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, provided 100% of the funding for this survey through their Texas Water Allocation Assessment Program. Surveying was performed using a multi-frequency (208 kHz, 50 kHz, and 24 kHz), sub- bottom profiling depth sounder. In addition, sediment core samples were collected in select locations and correlated with the multi-frequency depth sounder signal returns to estimate sediment accumulation thicknesses and sedimentation rates. Town Bluff Dam and B.A. Steinhagen Lake are located on the Neches River in Tyler and Jasper Counties, one half mile north of Town Bluff, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrub Thicket Establishment and Management
    HABITAT MANAGEMENT FACT SHEET Nebraska Pheasants Forever Shrub Thicket Establishment and Management January 2015 Establishing and Managing Shrub Thickets for Wildlife Shrubby cover is an essential part of weather. To accomplish this, the shrub the habitat planning process for bobwhite thicket should be a minimum size of quail, but can also be a useful addition for 1500 ft2 (30’ x 50’ block). To ensure the prairie grouse, pheasants, deer, or even thicket is dense enough to provide non-game species such as songbirds or adequate protection a 3’ x 3’ spacing is pollinators. Because of their small acre recommended. Avoid using multiple requirement, they are a minimal impact species within a thicket. Instead plant habitat addition that can find a place on multiple thickets each with a different The average shrub thicket planting is planted in any farm or ranch. species. a 30’ x 50’ block . Each shrub is planted on 3’x3’ spacing providing adequate density for escape Species Selection Location cover once established. Native shrubs such as American Consider locations in which you plum, chokecherry, elderberry, dogwood, could imagine a natural thicket sand cherry, silver buffaloberry, establishing: drainages, low areas and skunkbush sumac, common snowberry valleys are ideal. These lower areas tend and Wood’s rose are the most common to collect additional water and can help selections. Consider planting tall, keep thickets thriving during periods of suckering species (American plum, low rainfall. Avoid hilltops and potential chokecherry, etc.) for upland bird species lekking sites for prairie grouse. like ring-necked pheasants and northern Some species require more shrubby bobwhite quail.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of the Subtropical Transitional Thicket in the Eastern Cape, Based on Syntaxonomic and Structural Attributes
    S. Afr. J. Bot., 1987, 53(5): 329 - 340 329 A classification of the subtropical transitional thicket in the eastern Cape, based on syntaxonomic and structural attributes D.A. Everard Department of Plant Sciences, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 6140 Republic of South Africa Accepted 11 June 1987 Subtropical transitional thicket, traditionally known as valley bushveld, covers a significant proportion of the eastern Cape. This paper attempts to classify the subtropical transitional thicket into syntaxonomic and structural units and relate it to other thicket types on a continental basis. Twelve sites along a rainfall gradient were sampled for floristic and structural attributes. The floristic data were classified using TWINSPAN. Results indicate that the class subtropical transitional thicket has at least two orders of vegetation, namely kaffrarian thicket and kaffrarian succulent thicket. Two forms of thicket were recognized for both these orders viz. mesic kaffrarian thicket and xeric kaffrarian thicket for the kaffrarian thicket and mesic succulent thicket and xeric succulent thicket for the kaffrarian succulent thicket. Ordination of site data by DECORANA grouped sites according to these vegetation categories and in a sequence along axis 1 to which the rainfall gradient can be clearly related. Variation within the mesic kaffrarian thicket was however greater than between some of the other thicket types, indicating that more data are required before these forms of thicket can be formalized. Composition, endemism, diversity and the environmental controls on the distribution of the thicket types are discussed. 'n Aansienlike gedeelte van die Oos-Kaap word beslaan deur subtropiese oorgangsruigte, wat tradisioneel as valleibosveld bekend is. Hierdie studie is 'n poging om subtropiese oorgangsruigte in sintaksonomiese en strukturele eenhede te klassifiseer en dit op 'n kontinentale basis in verband met ander ruigtetipes te bring.
    [Show full text]
  • The TEXAS ARCHITECT INDEX
    Off1cial Publication of the TEXAS ARCHITECT The Texas Society of ArchitiiCU TSA IS the off•cu11 organization of the Texas VOLUME 22 / MAY, 1972 / NO. 5 Reg•on of the Amer1c:an lnst1tut10n of Archllecu James D Pfluger, AlA Ed1t0r Taber Ward Managmg Ed110r Banny L Can1zaro Associate Eduor V. Raymond Smith, Al A Associate Ed1tor THE TEXAS ARCH ITECT " published INDEX monthly by Texas Society of Architects, 904 Perry Brooks Buildtng, 121 East 8th Street, COVER AND PAGE 3 Austen, Texas 78701 Second class postage pa1d at Ausun, Texas Application to matl at Harwood K. Sm 1th and Partners second clan postage rates Is pend1ng ot Aunen, Texas. Copynghtcd 1972 by the TSA were commissioned to design a Subscription price, $3.00 per year, In junior college complex w1th odvuncc. initial enrollment of 2500 Edllonal contnbut1ons, correspondence. and students. The 245-acre site w1ll advertising material env1ted by the editor Due to the nature of th publlcauon. editorial ultimately handle 10,000 full-time conuulbullons cannot be purchoscd students. Pub11sher g•ves p rm1ss on for reproduction of all or part of edatonal matenal herem, and rcQulllts publication crcd1t be IJIVCn THE PAGE 6 TEXAS ARCHITECT, and Dllthor of matenol when lnd•C3ted PubiJcat•ons wh1ch normally The Big Thicket - a wilderness pay for editon I matenal are requested to grvc under assault. Texans must ac­ conStdcrat on to the author of reproduced byhned feature matenal cept the challenge of its surv1val. ADVERTISERS p 13 - Texas/Unicon Appearance of names and p1ctures of products and services m tither ed1torlal or PAGE 11 Structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
    Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up­ wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Proposed Fastrill Reservoir in East Texas: a Study Using
    THE PROPOSED FASTRILL RESERVOIR IN EAST TEXAS: A STUDY USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS Michael Ray Wilson, B.S. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2009 APPROVED: Paul Hudak, Major Professor and Chair of the Department of Geography Samuel F. Atkinson, Minor Professor Pinliang Dong, Committee Member Michael Monticino, Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Wilson, Michael Ray. The Proposed Fastrill Reservoir in East Texas: A Study Using Geographic Information Systems. Master of Science (Applied Geography), December 2009, 116 pp., 26 tables, 14 illustrations, references, 34 titles. Geographic information systems and remote sensing software were used to analyze data to determine the area and volume of the proposed Fastrill Reservoir, and to examine seven alternatives. The controversial reservoir site is in the same location as a nascent wildlife refuge. Six general land cover types impacted by the reservoir were also quantified using Landsat imagery. The study found that water consumption in Dallas is high, but if consumption rates are reduced to that of similar Texas cities, the reservoir is likely unnecessary. The reservoir and its alternatives were modeled in a GIS by selecting sites and intersecting horizontal water surfaces with terrain data to create a series of reservoir footprints and volumetric measurements. These were then compared with a classified satellite imagery to quantify land cover types. The reservoir impacted the most ecologically sensitive land cover type the most. Only one alternative site appeared slightly less environmentally damaging. Copyright 2009 by Michael Ray Wilson ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge my thesis committee members, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYTOGEOGRAPHY of NAMIBIA: I.E. Geographical Distributions of Plants
    PHYTOGEOGRAPHY OF NAMIBIA: i.e. geographical distributions of plants. The world flora may be mapped in different ways depending on the botanical criteria used for defining mapping units. When spatial data are used without considering the precise criteria used to define such data, results may be confusing. Two research traditions in biogeography are generally recognized, namely ecological and historical biogeography (Rosen 1988), however there are approaches that fit neither of these traditions. Ecological phytogeography is based on growth form of plants regardless of their taxonomic identity, e.g. biomes; or based on growth form and/or floristic composition, regardless of distribution ranges of taxa. Historical phytogeography is based on the total geographical range of taxa, regardless of their growth forms, e.g. the flora (the constituent plant taxa of an area, usually global); or phytogeographic region (an area with its own distinctive complement of species). It is a taxon-centred approach focussed on species, genera and/or families. The follow maps show the various ways in which the vegetation and flora of Namibia have been interpreted and mapped. Biomes Vegetation Vegetation structure structure Biomes Endemism Diversity Endemism Diversity Mendelsohn et al. 2002. Atlas of Namibia. David Phillip Publishers, Cape Town. White (1983)’s divisions in Namibia 22 Dry deciduous forest & secondary grassland 28 Mopane woodland & scrub woodland 35 Transition:woodland to Acacia deciduous bushland & wooded grassland. 36 Transition: mopane scrub woodland to Karoo-Namib shrubland 44 Kalahari Acacia wooded grassland & deciduous bushland 47 Brachystegia thicket && edaphic grassland 51 Bushy Karoo-Namib shrubland 56 Kalahari/Karoo-Namib transition 74 The Namib desert (Namib) 75 Herbabeous swamp & aquatic 76 Halophytic vegetation Kaokoveld Gariep Centres of plant diversity and endemism (Van Wyk & Smith 2000 ) The Greater Cape Floristic Region (GCFR) Is it only south of the border? Or in Namibia? (Born, J., Linder, H.P.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Oklahoma Odonata
    Libellula comanche Calvert, 1907 - Comanche Skimmer Useful regional references: Libellula composita (Hagen, 1873) - Bleached Skimmer A Checklist of Libellula croceipennis Sélys, 1868 - Neon Skimmer —Dragonflies and damselflies of the West by Dennis Paulson (2009) Libellula cyanea Fabricius, 1775 - Spangled Skimmer and Dragonflies and damselflies of the East by Dennis Paulson (2011) Oklahoma Odonata Libellula flavida Rambur, 1842 - Yellow-sided Skimmer Princeton University Press. Libellula incesta Hagen, 1861 - Slaty Skimmer —Damselflies of Texas: A Field Guide by John C. Abbott (2011) and (Dragonflies and Damselflies) Libellula luctuosa Burmeister, 1839 - Widow Skimmer Dragonflies of Texas: A Field Guide by John C. Abbott (2015) University of Texas Press. Libellula nodisticta Hagen, 1861 - Hoary Skimmer Libellula pulchella Drury, 1773 - Twelve-spotted Skimmer —Oklahoma Odonata Project: https://biosurvey.ou.edu/smith/Oklahoma_Odonata.html Libellula saturata Uhler, 1857 - Flame Skimmer Compiled by Brenda D. Smith — Smith BD, Patten MA (2020) Dragonflies at a Biogeographical Libellula semifasciata Burmeister, 1839 - Painted Skimmer Crossroads: The Odonata of Oklahoma and Complexities Beyond its & Michael A. Patten Libellula vibrans Fabricius, 1793 - Great Blue Skimmer Borders. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. Macrodiplax balteata (Hagen, 1861) - Marl Pennant Miathyria marcella (Sélys, 1856) - Hyacinth Glider Oklahoma Biological Survey, Micrathyria hagenii Kirby, 1890 - Thornbush Dasher Oklahoma
    [Show full text]
  • National Forests & Grasslands in Texas
    Cooperative Wildlife Management Areas Designated trails (in miles) (USFS/Texas Parks and Wildlife Department) Multi-use Angelina National Forest Ranger Multi-use Mountain NATIONAL FORESTS & Hiking non- District Motorized Bike Bannister 25,658 acres motorized Davy Crockett National Forest Angelina 2.7 GRASSLANDS IN TEXAS Davy Alabama Creek 14,561 acres Crockett 22 52 Sabine National Forest FINGERTIP FACTS Sabine 1 Moore Plantation 26,455 acres FOREST SUPERVISOR – Eddie Taylor Sam Houston 120 85 20 Caddo National Grassland Caddo/LBJ 0 92 4 Caddo 16,150 acres TOTALS 147.7 144 85 24 Sam Houston National Forest THE ORGANIZATION: Four National Forests and two National Grasslands comprising 675,816 Sam Houston 162,984 acres acres in 15 counties make up the National Minerals Forests & Grasslands in Texas. Forest Supervisor Permitted wells 299 Wilderness Areas Headquarters is in Lufkin. Approximately 140 Reserved/Outstanding Mineral Acres 203,339 Angelina National Forest employees make up the workforce. 2000 Soil Resource Inventory – Order II: 675,832 acres completed. Turkey Hill 5,473 acres This completes the Order II update for the NFGT. Upland Island 13,331acres Angelina National Forest Established in 1934 Davy Crockett National Forest Ranger District Office in Zavalla Designated miles of roads Big Slough 3,639 acres Acres: 153,334 State County USFS Sabine National Forest Acres per county: Angelina, 58,684; Jasper, 21,023; San Augustine, 64,389; Nacogdoches, 9,238 1,836 1,598 2,394 Indian Mounds 12,369acres Davy Crockett National Forest Sam Houston National Forest Established 1934 Ongoing research projects Little Lake Creek 3,855 acres Ranger District Office in Ratcliff Wildlife (8) & Fisheries (2) 10 Botanical 3 Acres: 160,467 Silvicultural 1 Insects 1 Acres per county: Houston, 93,155; Trinity, 67,312 Archeology 2 Chemical 0 Long-term Soil Productivity 1 TOTAL 18 Sabine National Forest Established 1934 Grazing – 5,000 AUMs graze on 17,438 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Thicket Reporter, Issue
    BIG THICKET October-November-December 2013 Reporter Issue #120 BIG THICKET DAY, October 12 Big Thicket Day 2013 began with ences. She provided a litany of his a board and membership meeting achievements, including his 18-year with Jan Ruppel, President, presiding. summer workshops for Environ- mental Science Teachers, his publi- The keynote speaker was Dr. Ken cations, research, awards, and other Kramer, former Executive Direc- awards received and offi ces held. tor of the Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club and current volunteer Water Mona Halvorsen reported on the Resources Chair and Legislative Thicket of Diversity, All Taxa Biodiversity Advisor, who addressed “Our State’s Inventory. (See Diversity Dispatch). Water Future – Progress and Chal- lenges.” Kramer noted that the Leg- Michael Hoke, Chair of the Neches islature made signifi cant eff orts this River Adventures Committee, pre- year to advance water conserva- sented a PowerPoint that included tion and to fi nance infrastructure, plans for curricula-based student use. and he outlined challenges ahead. Dr. Ken Kramer was the keynote Dr. James Westgate gave the elec- speaker for Big Thicket Day Ann Roberts, Chair of the Awards tion report for the Nominating Committee, presented the R.E. Committee. All nominees were After lunch, committees met to work Jackson Conservation Award to Dr. elected including Betty Grimes as on upcoming plans and projects. James Westgate, Lamar University Secretary plus two new directors — Professor of Earth and Space Sci- Leslie Dubey and Iolinda Gonzalez. Presidential Footnotes … By Jan Ruppel Because of the government shut- have a number of activities devel- the preservation and protection of down we held BTA’s 49th Big Thicket oping to celebrate throughout the the Big Thicket region and continue Day at First Baptist Church in Sara- year.
    [Show full text]
  • John C. Abbott Director, Museum Research and Collections Alabama
    John C. Abbott Director, Museum Research and Collections http://www.OdonataCentral.org Alabama Museum of Natural History http://www.MigratoryDragonflyPartnership.org The University of Alabama http://www.PondWatch.org 119 Smith Hall, Box #870340 http://www.AbbottNature.com Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0340 USA http://www.AbbottNaturePhotography.com http://almnh.ua.edua (205) 348-0534, office (512) 970-4090, cell [email protected]; [email protected] EDUCATION Stroud Water Research Center, Philadelphia Academy of Sciences Postdoc, 1999 University of North Texas Biology/Ecology Ph.D., 1999 University of North Texas Biology/Ecology M.S., 1998 Texas A&M University Zoology/Entomology B.S., 1993 Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science, University of North Texas 1991 PROFESIONAL EXPERIENCE 2016-present Director, Museum Research and Collections, University of Alabama Museums 2016-present Adjunct Faculty, Department of Anthropology, University of Alabama 2013-2015 Director, Wild Basin Creative Research Center at St. Edward’s University 2006-2013 Curator of Entomology, Texas Natural Science Center 2005-2013 Senior Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, UT Austin 1999-2005 Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin 2004-2013 Environmental Science Institute, University of Texas 2000-2006 Research Associate, Texas Memorial Museum, Texas Natural History Collections 1999 Research Scientist, Stroud Water Research Center, Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences 1997-1998 Associate Faculty, Collin County Community College (Plano, Texas) 1997-1998 Teaching Fellow, University of North Texas PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS 27. J.C. Abbott. In prep. Description of the male and nymph of Phyllogomphoides cornutifrons (Odonata: Gomphidae): A South American enigma. 26. J.C. Abbott, K.K.
    [Show full text]