What's in Our Food? a Guide to Introducing Effective Front-Of-Package Nutrient Labels

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What's in Our Food? a Guide to Introducing Effective Front-Of-Package Nutrient Labels What’s in Our Food? A guide to introducing effective front-of-package nutrient labels Citation: Vital Strategies and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. What’s in Our Food? A guide to introducing effective front-of-package nutrient labels. Trish Cotter1, Lindsey Smith Taillie2, Nandita Murukutla1, Luyanda Majija1, Alexey Kotov1, Marissa Hall2, Sandra Mullin1, Barry Popkin2. September 2020. 1 Vital Strategies 2 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Editors: Karen Schmidt and Dorian Block Design: Lizania Cruz and Karen Yung Special thanks to: Mercedes Mora, Luis Fernado Gomez, Isabella Higgins, Emily Busey, Pallavi Puri, Alejandro Calvillo, Rebecca Berner and Simón Barquera. Vital Strategies and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill gratefully acknowledge Bloomberg Philanthropies for their generous support of this project. Front cover: Civil society groups in South Africa protesting for better regulations on how unhealthy packaged food is labeled. Source: Health-e News Service Creative commons license: This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Com- mons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA. The content in this document may be freely used in accordance with this license provided the material is accompanied by the follow- ing attribution: Vital Strategies and University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. What’s in Our Food? A guide to introducing effective front-of-package nutrient labels. Trish Cotter1, Lindsey Smith Taillie2, Nandita Murukutla1, Luyanda Majija1, Alexey Kotov1, Marissa Hall2, Sandra Mullin1, Barry Popkin2. September 2020. 1Vital Strategies, 2University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Content 1 Overview 2 Step 1: Define the public health problem 8 Step 2: Understand the scientific basis for labels 11 Step 3: Review existing labels from other settings for local context 12 Step 4: Form an expert advisory committee 13 Step 5: Engage civil society 15 Step 6: Build public support 18 Step 7: Test label designs and identify an effective label 21 Step 8: Develop graphic design guidelines 22 Step 9: Evaluate policy impact 23 References 26 Appendix WHAT’S IN OUR FOOD? A guide to introducing effective front-of-package nutrient labels 1 WHAT’S IN OUR FOOD? A guide to introducing effective front-of-package nutrient labels Overview Labels on the front of food packages are an effective and efficient means of communication with consumers at the point of purchase. A number of countries have implemented or propose to implement front-of-package nutrient labels in an effort to communicate the (un)healthfulness of foods and beverages and to encourage healthy diets. This document may serve as a guidebook for governments, researchers, civil society groups and other stakeholders engaged in the development of front- of-package nutrient labels. It is built on previous experiences and outlines the key considerations and lessons learned in the process of developing an effec- tive front-of-package label. It is also built on a conceptual framework of how labels work, with the underlying objective of a nutrient labeling system to: 1) identify unhealthy foods and 2) discourage excess consumption of them. The steps include strategies for research, communication and development of a front-of-package nutrient label. This guide outlines these steps, with a greater emphasis on communication and research. Many of these activities can be implemented simultaneously; early planning of all of these activities is crucial to success. The steps, described in detail below, are: 1. Define the public health problem. 2. Determine scientific criteria for labels. 3. Review existing labels from other settings for local context. 4. Engage civil society. 5. Form an expert advisory committee. 6. Build public support. 7. Test label designs and identify an effective label. 8. Develop graphic design guidelines for implementing labels. 9. Evaluate policy impact. 2 WHAT’S IN OUR FOOD? A guide to introducing effective front-of-package nutrient labels STEP 1: Define the public health problem 1.1 WHY DO WE NEED FRONT-OF-PACKAGE NUTRIENT LABELS? Over 2 billion people—nearly one-third of the world’s population—are over- weight or obese, including more than 41 million overweight children under age 5. This global epidemic is a key driver of noncommunicable disease, which causes more than 70% of global deaths.1 Obesity and poor diet increase the risk of cancer, heart disease, stroke, Type 2 diabetes and related premature death. Undernutrition and obesity often coexist, as people increasingly consume cheap ultra-processed foods and drinks, which lack nutrients but are dense in fat and calories.2,3 Such unhealthy diets are estimated to be responsible for 11 million preventable deaths globally per year.4-6 The obesity epidemic places an unsustainable burden on individuals, govern- ments and society and is a growing problem in low- and middle-income countries, undermining health and economic development. As a result, policymakers and public health advocates alike are increasingly looking for policy levers to improve population nutritional status, in an effort to reduce the burden on health systems, support attempts to choose healthier options, and discourage consumption of ultra-processed foods and beverages.7,8 1.2 IMPORTANCE OF REDUCING CONSUMPTION OF ULTRA- PROCESSED PRODUCTS Colombia Bus stop poster that reads: “We have the right to informa- tion” was a part of Red PaPaz’s front-of-package nutrient labeling mass media campaign in 2018. Source: Red PaPaz archive 3 WHAT’S IN OUR FOOD? A guide to introducing effective front-of-package nutrient labels Increasingly, pre-packaged foods and beverages have become readily available in virtually every community across the globe, regardless of income level or population density.9-13 Combined with aggressive marketing of these products, this has dramatically changed the way people eat in many countries, displac- ing traditional diets and resulting in diets that are much less healthy.14-17 Ultra-processed foods are generally shelf stable, ready-to-eat or ready-to- heat, high in energy density and low in beneficial nutrients (e.g., fiber).18 Most of these pre-packaged foods are processed with high levels of added sugars, sodium, saturated fats and refined carbohydrates; research has found these nutrients of concern are connected to increased obesity and chronic nutri- tion-related diseases.19-23 In addition, the current state of research shows that excessive consumption of ultra-processed food contributes to poor dietary quality and obesity.3,24,25 There is extensive evidence from one major randomized controlled trial run by the U.S. National Institutes of Health26 and dozens of cohort studies that show increased consumption of ultra-processed foods is linked with increased overweight and obesity, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, some Figure 1: Countries with mandatory or voluntary food labels MANDATORY Countries with either mandatory or voluntary VOLUNTARY interpretive labels on packaged foods Denmark Finland Iceland Lithuania Norway Sweden Denmark United Kingdom Czech Republic Mexico Poland Implementing Oct. 2020 Iran Slovenia Croatia Thailand Portugal, Spain Austria, Belgium Philippines France, Germany Ecuador Luxembourg Switzerland Nigeria Brunei United Arab Malaysia Emirates Peru Israel Sri Argentina Lanka Singapore Chile Uruguay Implementing Feb. 2021 Australia New Zealand Last updated September 2, 2020 | © Copyright 2020 Global Food Research Program UNC 4 WHAT’S IN OUR FOOD? A guide to introducing effective front-of-package nutrient labels cancers, and mortality.27-43 Reductions in unhealthy diet, particularly avoiding ultra-processed foods is key to reducing obesity.26 Furthermore, the consumption of ultra-processed products displaces the consumption of healthy foods, thereby limiting the consumption of other key ingredients and nutrients. To improve diet and health, leading health organi- zations such as WHO recommend reduction in consumption of these ener- gy-dense, micronutrient-poor foods as a critical measure to tackle the growing obesity epidemic.21,23,44-46 Consumers need access to clear information to identify unhealthy foods and beverages so they can make healthier choices. Not only have food and beverage products become less healthy over time, the sheer number of choices in stores makes it difficult and confusing for con- Figure 2: Typology of front-of-package labels related to health57 and nutrition. Note: The pictured labels are examples and not an exhaustive list of formats. Source: Ikonen I, Sotgiu F, Aydinli A, Verlegh PW. Consumer effects of front-of-package nutrition labeling: an interdisciplinary meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2020;48(3):360-383. Note: The pictured labels are examples and not an exhaustive list of formats. sumers to select healthier foods.47 Typically, shoppers take less than 10 seconds to select grocery items—not enough time to read and interpret many complicated nutrition facts panels.48-50 In essence, research has shown current back-of-the-package nutrition facts 5 WHAT’S IN OUR FOOD? A guide to introducing effective front-of-package nutrient labels panels do not work for quick, informed decision-making, and simpler, more effective options are needed.51,52 Adding to the confusion, unhealthy products may also feature misleading health and nutrition claims on their packages. Claims related to a particular nutrient (e.g., “high in calcium” or “low-fat”) and direct or indirect claims about a food’s potential health benefits can give an otherwise unhealthy product a “health halo effect,” leading consumers to misunderstand its nutritional quali- ty.53-56 Food packages are a highly effective means of communication with consumers at the point of decision-making and purchase. Marketers have long considered the food package as a premium channel for appealing to consumer preferences and purchases. Through attractive pack- aging, labeling and claims, marketers have sought to increase sales.
Recommended publications
  • FDA Compliance and Printing Inks Often Printers Have Questions
    FDA Compliance and Printing Inks Often Printers have questions concerning the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and compliance of the inks used to print on food packaging applications. The FDA permits the use of inks (e.g. solvent base, water base and UV) as components of food packaging under certain conditions. Several items must be understood before one can determine if a printing ink is suitable for use on food packaging applications: “Direct Food Additives” are substances directly and intentionally added to foods, including, but not limited to, ingredients, preservatives, colors and stabilizers. “Indirect Food Additives” generally refer to substances that are not intended to, but can become, components of food as a result of use in articles that contact food (e.g. ink on food packaging applications). Both “Direct and Indirect Food Additives” require complex petitions and filings with the FDA that can be very costly, burdensome and time consuming. Nazdar inks are not designed to be and are not approved as Direct or Indirect Food Additives. However, if an ink on food packaging applications is not expected to become a component of the food under its intended conditions of use, it is not a food additive by definition and, therefore, may be used without the need to obtain any FDA clearance. A properly conducted migration study is considered to be a sound basis for concluding that the substance is not a food additive. This study should be performed in accordance with FDA’s guidance document, entitled; Preparation of Food Contact Notifications and Food Additive Petitions for Food Contact Substances: Chemistry Recommendations https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry- preparation-premarket-submissions-food-contact-substances-chemistry Another method of concluding that a substance is not a food additive is the use of a functional barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do You Need to Know to Reduce Your Risk?
    What do you need to know to reduce your risk? Understand what high risk drinking is Understand Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) Levels and some key points about BAC Understand what a standard drink size is vs. a typical party drink size Know the signs and symptoms of alcohol poisoning Know the actions to take if someone appears to be suffering from alcohol poisoning High Risk Drinking Participating in drinking games Celebratory drinking (21st birthday, “the big game”, end of semester, graduation, spring break…) Drinking to get drunk Pre-partying/pre-loading Doing shots Chugging Using a funnel, hose, trough or punch bowl Mixing alcohol with any drugs (legal or illegal) Not knowing what you are drinking or how much you are drinking Combining alcohol with energy drinks These are examples, certainly not all the ways you can drink in a high risk fashion. Any drinking that is in high amounts or short periods of time, creating a situation where the body can’t handle the alcohol, is high risk drinking. How the Body Processes Alcohol When a person drinks alcohol, it can enter the bloodstream immediately. The molecular structure of alcohol is small, so the alcohol can be absorbed or transferred into the blood through the walls of the stomach and the small intestine. The stomach actually has a relatively slow absorption rate; it is the small intestine that absorbs most of the alcohol. Once in the bloodstream, alcohol moves through the body and comes into contact with virtually every organ. However, some of the highest concentrations, and certainly the highest impact, is caused by the alcohol when it reaches the brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Easy Open Pull Tab
    Easy Open Pull Tab Submitted to the Italian Packaging Technology Competition March 15, 2006 Brian Calcagno Teresa Haynes Hatfield Josh Taylor California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo PROBLEM There are many people in the world who bite their fingernails. Health risks and public annoyance aside, this causes a disability in opening food packages with metal pull-tabs, such as soft drink cans. Since about 100 billion soft drink cans are produced in the U.S. every year (about one per person per day), it’s obvious that these cans are common in every refrigerator (Kyung- Sun). They should be easy to open, and to many they are. However there is still room for improvement to the design, as nailbiters still find some cans difficult to open. Some soft drink can tabs have been rounded at the end, leaving a tiny space for leverage, but this space is only large enough for a strong fingernail. If the person trying to open the package has no such fingernail, he will have a very difficult time getting to his favorite soft drink. A recent innovation in canned soup packaging has used pull-tabs to make can openers obsolete. The larger, heavier design of these poses an even more significant challenge to nailbiters than soda cans. The geometry of the pull tab on these larger cans causes the tabs to resist upward force even more strongly than familiar soda cans. The shape of the score that the tab is supposed to break also affects the amount of force necessary to open the can.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol Units a Brief Guide
    Alcohol Units A brief guide 1 2 Alcohol Units – A brief guide Units of alcohol explained As typical glass sizes have grown and For example, most whisky has an ABV of 40%. popular drinks have increased in A 1 litre (1,000ml) bottle of this whisky therefore strength over the years, the old rule contains 400ml of pure alcohol. This is 40 units (as 10ml of pure alcohol = one unit). So, in of thumb that a glass of wine was 100ml of the whisky, there would be 4 units. about 1 unit has become out of date. And hence, a 25ml single measure of whisky Nowadays, a large glass of wine might would contain 1 unit. well contain 3 units or more – about the The maths is straightforward. To calculate units, same amount as a treble vodka. take the quantity in millilitres, multiply it by the ABV (expressed as a percentage) and divide So how do you know how much is in by 1,000. your drink? In the example of a glass of whisky (above) the A UK unit is 10 millilitres (8 grams) of pure calculation would be: alcohol. It’s actually the amount of alcohol that 25ml x 40% = 1 unit. an average healthy adult body can break down 1,000 in about an hour. So, if you drink 10ml of pure alcohol, 60 minutes later there should be virtually Or, for a 250ml glass of wine with ABV 12%, none left in your bloodstream. You could still be the number of units is: suffering some of the effects the alcohol has had 250ml x 12% = 3 units.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Brochure Audion
    //// F O O D PACKAGING SOLUTIONS THE STORY OF AUDION Audion Elektro B.V. was established in 1947 in Amsterdam. In the fifties the company started to focus on manufacturing sealing machines besides the trading business. In the past decades Audion has grown to become a leading name in the packaging industry. Today, with a worldwide dealer network, Audion is represented in more than 65 countries throughout the world. Audion packaging machines are characterised by outstanding quality. By keeping control over the development and production of the machines in the Netherlands and Germany, Audion has ma- naged to stay flexible and customer oriented. The service Audion provides is regarded as a decisive advantage by our customers. Short delivery times of machines, parts and accessories and innovative solutions to diverse packaging problems are important qualities that distinguish Audion in the industry. With Audion, you have a large choice of packaging machines that meet your production requirements. The experience and expertise accumulated over the years, in finding solutions for customers, is unique. The extensive machine range on our website (audion.com) shows that there’s a solution for every packaging problem. Together we make the perfect package. Audion, Groenburgwal 31, Amsterdam Established 1947 |||| FOOD MARKETS |||| |||| |||| |||| |||| E-FULFILLMENT |||| MEDICAL / PHARMA / HIGH-TECH |||| PARTS MARKETS |||| |||| |||| |||| FOOD MAGNETA 300 GPS If we speak about a machine which Hygienic stainless steel machine made for has proven itself! The Magneta is a user the food/retail industry. friendly and low maintenance impulse The GPS range consists of versatile systems sealer. The Magneta range consists of a to pack and present your deli products in SEALING complete range with different sized mo- the best possible way.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Stress Cracking of Aluminium Alloy Beverage End Scores
    MPMA / BSDA / BBPA RECOMMENDED CODE OF PRACTICE ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS CRACKING OF ALUMINIUM ALLOY BEVERAGE END SCORES Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. Technical explanation 3. End manufacturing factors and quality assurance 4. Process / prevention / filling line conditions and equipment specification 5. Test method for assessing the dryness of can Ends 6. Secondary packaging 7. Environment / post manufacture / distribution and storage 8. Training and education 9. Reference documents 10. Figures DATE OF ISSUE: 14 MAY 2001 1. Introduction This Code of Practice has been prepared and agreed jointly by MPMA (Metal Packaging Manufacturers’ Association), BSDA (British Soft Drinks Association) and British Beer and Pub Association. It is based on current best practice and will be subject to annual review. Detailed technical specifications should be agreed between individual suppliers and customers. 2. Technical Explanation Aluminium alloy beer and soft drink can Ends have been long established as successful components, but can undergo an external corrosion failure process at the score due to reaction with moisture, leading to the tabs popping outwards suddenly. The failure is commonly termed stress corrosion cracking and typically occurs in shrink-wraps or cartons held in warehouses. Failure risks through stress corrosion are especially high in hot and humid climates e.g. temperatures above 30°C and humidity above 60%rh (relative humidity). Depending on the variations in these conditions and other related factors contained in this technical brief, failures from within 2 weeks to several months after filling may occur. Figure 1 describes a cross section of an easy-open End and illustrates the area of failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Processing for Safe, Shelf-Stable and Ready-To-Eat Food
    IAEA-TECDOC-1337 Radiation processing for safe, shelf-stable and ready-to-eat food Proceedings of a final Research Co-ordination Meeting held in Montreal, Canada, 10–14 july 2000 January 2003 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Food and Environmental Protection Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria RADIATION PROCESSING FOR SAFE, SHELF-STABLE AND READY-TO-EAT FOOD IAEA, VIENNA, 2003 IAEA-TECDOC-1337 ISBN 92–0–100703–5 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2003 Printed by the IAEA in Austria January 2003 FOREWORD The increasingly busy lifestyles of populations in many countries have driven the demand for safe, convenient and ready-to-eat food. Traditional food processes such as drying, canning or refrigeration offer a partial solution to this demand as the sensory quality of such food may be significantly affected or the products may be contaminated by pathogenic bacteria during preparation. For developing countries, safe shelf-stable food without the need for refrigeration would offer advantages. In addition, the increasing number of immuno-compromised populations in many countries requires a new approach to food safety to meet their needs. Irradiation offers a potential to enhance microbiological safety and quality of food through shelf-life extension. The benefits of irradiation as a sanitary treatment of many types of food are well known, some of which are applied commercially in several countries. Little data were available, however, on the effect of irradiation on minimally processed food and composite food including prepared meals. A Co-ordinated Research Project (CRP) on the Development of Safe, Shelf-Stable and Ready-to-Eat Food through Radiation Processing therefore was implemented by the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture in 1996 to evaluate the role of irradiation for such food.
    [Show full text]
  • Go Green Living Guide
    GO GREEN ST. TAMMANY A GREEN LIVING GUIDE FOR ST. TAMMANY PRODUCED BY ST. TAMMANY PARISH GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES www.stpgov.org/Green-Living DOS AND DON'TS OF HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE To make sure you are recycling and disposing of Household Hazardous Waste correctly, take a minute to read over these topics. You may discover that you have been doing something wrong all along. DO DO DO Look carefully for a natu- Read the label and follow Keep all chemicals out of ral, non-hazardous substi- use, storage and disposal the reach of children and tute before buying. directions carefully. pets. DON’T DO DON’T Mix chemical products or Completely finish products Re-purpose pesticide or wastes. Dangerous, toxic in containers before dis- other chemical containers. reactions can occur. posal. DO DON’T DO Select water-based prod- Store corrosives, flamma- Choose the pump spray or ucts over solvent-based bles and poisons together. other alternatives rather products when available. than aerosol sprays. FLAMMABLE SOLIDS ARE DANGEROUS! These are solid wastes that pose a fire threat. Flammable solids are materials that have the potential to ignite by friction or heat sources, or by contact with other chemicals. The danger associated with flammable solids is that they have the potential to combust. Flammability is one of the more common dangers of hazardous wastes and must be watched carefully. Exam- ples of flammable solids are charcoal, matches, candles and silicon based caulking products. DID YOU KNOW... USED MOTOR OIL IS A HAZARDOUS WASTE? Used motor oil is a hazardous waste and cannot go into your curbside garbage or trash for pickup.
    [Show full text]
  • Amcor/Bemis: Flexible Medical Packaging Overlaps Draw DOJ Scrutiny
    Vol. 6 No. 400 November 9, 2018 Amcor/Bemis: Flexible Medical Packaging Overlaps Draw DOJ Scrutiny Deal Update DOJ staff attorneys investigating Amcor’s proposed $5.2 billion purchase of packaging rival Bemis (BMS) have keyed in on two healthcare product lines in which the merging parties overlap, sources familiar with the matter said. The deal would combine two of the three dominant producers of coated TyVek, a breathable medical packaging film that can be sterilized. The tie-up would also join two significant U.S. converters of vented medical bags. DOJ staff has interviewed industry participants about these overlaps as recently as two weeks ago, the sources said. Given market shares and competitive dynamics, the merging firms’ overlap in coated TyVek raises a more significant antitrust issue than the vented medical bag overlap, industry sources said. Reflecting this dynamic, sources said that over time, DOJ interviews have become more focused on coated TyVek, to the exclusion of vented medical bags. The merging parties also overlap in food packaging, but these markets are generally fragmented and characterized by a more robust competitive environment than their medical counterparts. Amcor and Bemis, who announced their deal on August 6, have not disclosed the receipt of a DOJ second request. Spokespeople for Amcor and the DOJ declined to comment. Bemis did not respond to requests for comment. Coated flexible medical packaging. Amcor and Bemis both produce various types of sterile flexible medical packaging, which is sold to medical device manufacturers to protect medical equipment and devices ultimately sold to hospital groups and doctors.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasting in Homeric Epic 303
    HESPERIA 73 (2004) FEASTING IN Pages 301-337 HOMERIC EPIC ABSTRACT Feasting plays a centralrole in the Homeric epics.The elements of Homeric feasting-values, practices, vocabulary,and equipment-offer interesting comparisonsto the archaeologicalrecord. These comparisonsallow us to de- tect the possible contribution of different chronologicalperiods to what ap- pearsto be a cumulative,composite picture of around700 B.c.Homeric drink- ing practicesare of particularinterest in relation to the history of drinkingin the Aegean. By analyzing social and ideological attitudes to drinking in the epics in light of the archaeologicalrecord, we gain insight into both the pre- history of the epics and the prehistoryof drinkingitself. THE HOMERIC FEAST There is an impressive amount of what may generally be understood as feasting in the Homeric epics.' Feasting appears as arguably the single most frequent activity in the Odysseyand, apart from fighting, also in the Iliad. It is clearly not only an activity of Homeric heroes, but also one that helps demonstrate that they are indeed heroes. Thus, it seems, they are shown doing it at every opportunity,to the extent that much sense of real- ism is sometimes lost-just as a small child will invariablypicture a king wearing a crown, no matter how unsuitable the circumstances. In Iliad 9, for instance, Odysseus participates in two full-scale feasts in quick suc- cession in the course of a single night: first in Agamemnon's shelter (II. 1. thanks to John Bennet, My 9.89-92), and almost immediately afterward in the shelter of Achilles Peter Haarer,and Andrew Sherrattfor Later in the same on their return from their coming to my rescueon variouspoints (9.199-222).
    [Show full text]
  • Food Packaging Made from Recycled Paper and Board
    Page 1 of 3 Food Packaging made from Recycled Paper and Board Monitoring in Europe of packaging and foods has identified mineral oil contamination in a range of packaged foods. Mineral oils are widely used, and end up in foodstuffs by various routes. Since then, almost all sectors of the food industry as well as laboratories and supply industry have been concerned with the presence of mineral hydrocarbons and investigated into their origin. As a result, industry has gained a comprehensive understanding of the different sources of mineral oil contaminations.1 Many measures for the reduction of the transfer and occurrence of undesired mineral oils that have already been taken show objectively measurable success. There are many different routes by which contamination of foodstuffs with mineral oils can occur. Food packaging has been identified as one of these sources. EuPIA members have long offered mineral oil-free inks to be applied to the non-food side of packaging, and recommend that only these inks are used for these applications. Mineral oils can, however, migrate from recycled paper and board used for food packaging. In several EU member states the food packaging chain was called to take measures such that levels of mineral oil in foodstuffs are reduced. The European Commission has issued a recommendation2 on the monitoring of mineral oil hydrocarbons in food and in materials and articles intended to come into contact with food in 2017. In Germany the BMEL has drafted a legislation aimed at restricting mineral oil in food contact materials made from recycled paper and board.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Packaging Technology
    FOOD PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY Edited by RICHARD COLES Consultant in Food Packaging, London DEREK MCDOWELL Head of Supply and Packaging Division Loughry College, Northern Ireland and MARK J. KIRWAN Consultant in Packaging Technology London Blackwell Publishing © 2003 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered Editorial Offices: trademarks, and are used only for identification 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ and explanation, without intent to infringe. Tel: +44 (0) 1865 776868 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK First published 2003 Tel: +44 (0) 1865 791100 Blackwell Munksgaard, 1 Rosenørns Allè, Library of Congress Cataloging in P.O. Box 227, DK-1502 Copenhagen V, Publication Data Denmark A catalog record for this title is available Tel: +45 77 33 33 33 from the Library of Congress Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd, 550 Swanston Street, Carlton South, British Library Cataloguing in Victoria 3053, Australia Publication Data Tel: +61 (0)3 9347 0300 A catalogue record for this title is available Blackwell Publishing, 10 rue Casimir from the British Library Delavigne, 75006 Paris, France ISBN 1–84127–221–3 Tel: +33 1 53 10 33 10 Originated as Sheffield Academic Press Published in the USA and Canada (only) by Set in 10.5/12pt Times CRC Press LLC by Integra Software Services Pvt Ltd, 2000 Corporate Blvd., N.W. Pondicherry, India Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA Printed and bound in Great Britain, Orders from the USA and Canada (only) to using acid-free paper by CRC Press LLC MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall USA and Canada only: For further information on ISBN 0–8493–9788–X Blackwell Publishing, visit our website: The right of the Author to be identified as the www.blackwellpublishing.com Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
    [Show full text]