IN the HIGH COURT of BOTSWANA HELD at LOBATSE Misca. No. 52

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IN the HIGH COURT of BOTSWANA HELD at LOBATSE Misca. No. 52 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOTSWANA HELD AT LOBATSE Misca. No. 52 of 2002 In the matter between: ROY SESANA 1st Applicant KEIWA SETLHOBOGWA AND OTHERS 2nd & further Applicants and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (in his Respondent capacity as Recognized agent of the Government of the Republic of Botswana) Mr. G. Bennett for the Applicants Mr. S. T. Pilane with him Mr. L. D. Molodi for the Respondent J U D G M E N T CORAM: Hon. Mr. Justice M. Dibotelo Hon. Justice U. Dow Hon. Mr. Justice M. P. Phumaphi M. DIBOTELO, J.: 1. On the 19 February 2002, the Applicants filed an urgent application on notice of motion seeking at paragraphs 2 and 3 thereof an order declaring, inter alia, that: “2 (a) The termination by the Government with effect from 31 January 2002 of the following basic and essential services to the Applicants in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve (CKGR) (namely) – i. the provision of drinking water on a weekly basis; ii. the maintenance of the supply of borehole water; iii. the provision of rations to registered destitutes; iv. the provision of rations for registered orphans; v. the provision of transport for the Applicants’ children to and from school; vi. the provision of healthcare to the Applicants through mobile clinics and ambulance services is unlawful and unconstitutional; 2. the Government is obliged to: (i) restore to the Applicants the basic and essential services that it terminated with effect from 31 January 2002; and (ii) continue to provide to the Applicants the basic and essential services that it had been providing to them immediately prior to the termination of the provision of these services; (c) those Applicants, whom the Government forcibly removed from the Central Kalahari Game Reserve (CKGR) after the termination of the provision to them of the basic and essential services referred to above, have been unlawfully despoiled of their possession of the land which they lawfully occupied in their settlements in the CKGR, and should immediately be restored to their possession of that land. 3. the Respondent pays the Applicants’ costs.” The Application was supported by the founding affidavit of the First Applicant. 2. On the 4 March 2002, the First Applicant filed a supplementary affidavit seeking additional declaratory orders “….. that the refusal by the Government’s Department of Wildlife and National Parks to: (a) issue special game licences to the Applicants; and (b) allow them to enter the CKGR unless they possess a permit, is unlawful and unconstitutional.” The application was opposed by the Respondent who filed several opposing affidavits. The Applicants then filed the replying affidavit of the First Applicant and several supplementary or supporting affidavits. In his opposing papers, the Respondent also raised several points in limine. When the matter came up for hearing only the points of law were argued. On the 19 April 2002 I upheld those points of law and dismissed the application but in doing so, I also granted the Applicants, if they so wished, leave to re-institute their action on properly prepared papers in terms of the Rules of Court. 3. The Applicants were dissatisfied with my decision and took the matter to the Court of Appeal which on the 11 July 2002 took the view that it should be referred back to this Court for determination of the issues to be agreed by the parties. On the 23 January 2003 after the parties had formulated and agreed on the issues, the Court of Appeal referred this matter to the High Court, inter alia, in the following terms: “IT IS ORDERED BY CONSENT AS FOLLOWS: 1. The matter is referred to the High Court for the hearing of oral evidence by the Applicants’ witnesses at Ghanzi and the Respondent’s witnesses at Lobatse on a date to be determined by the Registrar as a matter of urgency in consultation with the parties’ legal representatives on the following issues: (a) whether the termination with effect from 31st January 2002 by the Government of the provision of basic and essential services to the Appellants in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve was unlawful and constitutional. (b) whether the Government is obliged to restore the provision of such services to the Appellants in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve; 2. whether subsequent to 31st January 2002 the Appellants were: (i) in possession of the land which they lawfully occupied in their settlements in the Central Kalahari Game Reserve; ii. deprived of such possession by the Government forcibly or wrongly and without their consent. (d) whether the Government’s refusal to: i. issue special game licences to the Appellants; and ii. allow the Appellants to enter into the Central Kahalahari Game Reserve unless they are issued with a permit is unlawful and constitutional.” Paragraph 8 of that Order states in part that: “The Court will give its full reasons in a judgment which will be handed down before the end of the session.” 4. The judgment referred to in paragraph 8 of the order was in fact handed down on the same day the order was made, i.e. the 23rd January 2003. In that judgment the Court of Appeal expressed the view that whether it upheld or set aside the judgment of this Court against which the Applicants had appealed, “on the affidavits which were already filed either by the appellants or by the respondent there would clearly be serious disputes of fact” (vide page 2 of that judgment); and went on to state at page 6 thereof that “….. the whole purpose of referring the matter for the hearing of oral evidence was to overcome any problems in relation to affidavits filed thus far and that any issues relating to them should no longer be a consideration in having the dispute between the parties resolved by oral evidence”, (my emphasis). 5. Issues 1(a) to (d) of the Court of Appeal order are the ones that require to be determined by this Court. Furthermore, a close examination of these issues reveals that they substantially incorporate the reliefs originally sought by the Applicants at paragraph 2 of their notice of motion, and the reliefs contained in the supplementary affidavit of the First Applicant filed on the 4 March 2002. The Respondent has urged the Court to determine who the Applicants are in this action so that there should be no doubt or confusion as to who the beneficiaries of the court order would be in the event the Court finds in favour of the Applicants, especially when it came to the implementation of the court order by the Government. It is an established principle that a Court should be able to supervise its own orders and to achieve that purpose it is important that there should be certainty as to who the litigants are in any given case. The Court has also from time to time raised this matter with Counsel for the Applicants because no witnesses who testified purported to speak for all the Applicants; even Losolobe Mooketsi (PW7) who relocated to New Xade where he was a paid Headman of Arbitration for Kikao Ward did not purport to speak on behalf of the Applicants. It has been argued by Counsel for the Applicants “that it would have been utterly impossible to call more than 240 Applicants to testify as to the individual circumstances in which each of them was relocated.” This may well be so but it did not and could not debar or prevent the calling of the leaders of the Applicants to testify on behalf of the Applicants in regard to the circumstances surrounding the relocation of the Applicants from the CKGR in early 2002. It is also important to identify who the Applicants are so that the outcome in this action binds only those persons. When the action was instituted there were 243 Applicants and some have since died, but were not substituted, while others did not come forward to prosecute their claim. One hundred and eighty-nine Applicants have authorized Attorneys Boko, Motlhala and Ketshabile to represent them in this action and it is those Applicants whose names appear in Table A annexed to the judgment who are parties to this action. 6. The trial took some 130 days spread over a period of just over two years and the typed record of the proceedings comprise some 18,900 pages. During the trial, there were several lengthy postponements at the instance of the Applicants, and save, for only one week when one of us was bereaving due to the loss of his mother, and may Her soul rest in ever lasting peace, the trial was never postponed for the reason that the Court was in no position to proceed with the same. At the commencement of the trial, the Court decided to conduct an inspection in loco of the new settlements of Kaudwane and New Xade outside the CKGR, and of the settlements of Gugamma, Kikao, Mothomelo, Metsiamanong, Molapo and Old Xade inside the CKGR. The decision to conduct the inspection of the settlements inside the CKGR was strongly opposed by the legal representatives of the Applicants in May 2004, but was supported by the Respondent who also asked the Court to visit Gope inside the CKGR. The main ground for opposing the inspection in loco of the settlements inside the CKGR by the legal representatives of the Applicants was that there was nothing for the Court to see in those settlements as the residents who used to live there had relocated to outside the CKGR. The Court decided to defer the visit to Gope, but indicated that it would do so if the need arose during the trial.
Recommended publications
  • Daily Hansard 08 March 2017
    DAILY YOUR VOICE IN PARLIAMENT THE SECOND MEETING OF THE THIRD SESSION OF THE ELEVENTH PARLIAMENT WEDNESDAY 08 MARCH 2017 MIXED VERSION HANSARD NO. 187 DISCLAIMER Unocial Hansard This transcript of Parliamentary proceedings is an unocial version of the Hansard and may contain inaccuracies. It is hereby published for general purposes only. The nal edited version of the Hansard will be published when available and can be obtained from the Assistant Clerk (Editorial). THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SPEAKER The Hon. Gladys K. T. Kokorwe MP. DEPUTY SPEAKER The Hon. Kagiso P. Molatlhegi, MP Gaborone South Clerk of the National Assembly - Ms B. N. Dithapo Deputy Clerk of the National Assembly - Ms T. Tsiang Learned Parliamentary Counsel - Mr S. Chikanda Assistant Clerk (E) - Mr R. Josiah CABINET His Excellency Lt. Gen. Dr. S. K. I. Khama PH, FOM, - President DCO, DSM, MP. His Honour M. E. K. Masisi, MP. (Moshupa- Vice President Manyana) - Hon. Dr. P. Venson-Moitoi, MP. (Serowe South) - Minister of International Affairs and Cooperation Hon. S. Tsogwane, MP. (Boteti North) - Minister of Local Government and Rural Development Hon. N. E. Molefhi, MP. (Selebi Phikwe East) - Minister of Infrastructure and Housing Development Hon. S. Kgathi, MP. (Bobirwa) - Minister of Defence, Justice and Security Hon. O. K. Mokaila, MP. (Specially Elected) - Minister of Transport and Communications Hon. P. M. Maele, MP. (Lerala - Maunatlala) - Minister of Land Management, Water and Sanitation Services Hon. E. J. Batshu, MP. (Nkange) - Minister of Nationality, Immigration and Gender Affairs Hon. D. K. Makgato, MP. (Sefhare - Ramokgonami) - Minister of Health and Wellness Minister of Environment, Natural Resources Conservation and Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of Botswana Second and Third Report To
    THE REPUBLIC OF BOTSWANA SECOND AND THIRD REPORT TO THE AFRICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES' RIGHTS (ACHPR) IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AFRICAN CHARTER ON HUMAN AND PEOPLES’ RIGHTS 2015 1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PART I. a. Abbreviations b. Introduction c. Methodology and Consultation Process II. PART II. A. General Information - B. Laws, policies and (institutional) mechanisms for human rights C. Follow-up to the 2010 Concluding observations D. Obstacles to the exercise and enjoyment of the rights and liberties enshrined in the African Charter: III. PART III A. Areas where Botswana has made significant progress in the realization of the rights and liberties enshrined in the African Charter a. Article 2, 3 and 19 (Non-discrimination and Equality) b. Article 7 & 26 (Fair trial, Independence of the Judiciary) c. Article 10 (Right to association) d. Article 14 (Property) e. Article 16 (Health) f. Article 17 (Education) g. Article 24 (Environment) B. Areas where some progress has been made by Botswana in the realization of the rights and liberties enshrined in the African Charter a. Article 1er (implementation of the provisions of the African Charter) b. Article 4 (Life and Integrity of the person) c. Article 5 (Human dignity/Torture) d. Article 9 (Freedom of Information) e. Article 11 (Freedom of Assembly) f. Article 12 (Freedom of movement) g. Article 13 (participation to public affairs) h. Article 15 (Work) i. Article 18 (Family) j. Article 20 (Right to existence) k. Article 21 (Right to freely dispose of wealth and natural resources) 2 | P a g e C.
    [Show full text]
  • Judging the Epidemic: a Judicial Handbook on HIV, Human Rights
    Judging the epidemic A judicial handbook on HIV, human rights and the law UNAIDS / JC2497E (English original, May 2013) ISBN 978-92-9253-025-9 Copyright © 2013. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS). All rights reserved. Publications produced by UNAIDS can be obtained from the UNAIDS Information Production Unit. Reproduction of graphs, charts, maps and partial text is granted for educational, not-for-profit and commercial purposes as long as proper credit is granted to UNAIDS: UNAIDS + year. For photos, credit must appear as: UNAIDS/name of photographer + year. Reproduction permission or translation-related requests—whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution—should be addressed to the Information Production Unit by e-mail at: [email protected]. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNAIDS concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNAIDS does not warrant that the information published in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use. Unless otherwise indicated photographs used in this document are used for illustrative purposes only. Unless indicated, any person depicted in the document is a “model”, and use of the photograph does not indicate endorsement by the model of the content of this document nor is there any relation between the model and any of the topics covered in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Tenure Reforms and Social Transformation in Botswana: Implications for Urbanization
    Land Tenure Reforms and Social Transformation in Botswana: Implications for Urbanization. Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Ijagbemi, Bayo, 1963- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 06/10/2021 17:13:55 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/196133 LAND TENURE REFORMS AND SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION IN BOTSWANA: IMPLICATIONS FOR URBANIZATION by Bayo Ijagbemi ____________________ Copyright © Bayo Ijagbemi 2006 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2006 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Bayo Ijagbemi entitled “Land Reforms and Social Transformation in Botswana: Implications for Urbanization” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 10 November 2006 Dr Thomas Park _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 10 November 2006 Dr Stephen Lansing _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 10 November 2006 Dr David Killick _______________________________________________________________________ Date: 10 November 2006 Dr Mamadou Baro Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Review Report of the Republic of Botswana
    Country Review Report of the Republic of Botswana Review by Sri Lanka and Guinea of the implementation by Botswana of articles 5-14 and 51-59 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption for the review cycle 2016- 2021 Page 1 of 257 I. Introduction 1. The Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption was established pursuant to article 63 of the Convention to, inter alia, promote and review the implementation of the Convention. 2. In accordance with article 63, paragraph 7, of the Convention, the Conference established at its third session, held in Doha from 9 to 13 November 2009, the Mechanism for the Review of Implementation of the Convention. The Mechanism was established also pursuant to article 4, paragraph 1, of the Convention, which states that States parties shall carry out their obligations under the Convention in a manner consistent with the principles of sovereign equality and territorial integrity of States and of non-intervention in the domestic affairs of other States. 3. The Review Mechanism is an intergovernmental process whose overall goal is to assist States parties in implementing the Convention. 4. The review process is based on the terms of reference of the Review Mechanism. II. Process 5. The following review of the implementation by Botswana of the Convention is based on the completed response to the comprehensive self-assessment checklist received from Botswana and any supplementary information provided in accordance with paragraph 27 of the terms of reference of the Review Mechanism and the outcome of the constructive dialogue between the governmental experts from Sri Lanka, Guinea and Botswana, by means of telephone conferences and e-mail exchanges or any further means of direct dialogue in accordance with the terms of reference and involving Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Botswana Gazette Wednesday 28 October 2020 High Noon As Stapteage 1 Battles P105m ‘Butterfly’ Suit Page 2
    THE BOTSWANA GAZEttE WEDNESDAY 28 OCTOBER 2020 HIGH NOON AS STAPTEAGE 1 BATTLES P105M ‘BUTTERFLy’ SuiT PAGE 2 EDNESDAY CTOBER SINCE 1984 W 28 O 2020 FREE! “Kitso ke maatla” KEBONANG BROTHERS ARE FREE! • Court acquits them of P250M NPF Charges due to lack of evidence • State faces possible suit for malicious prosecution • Justice Kebonang to resume work STORY ON PAGE 3 UDC Witness Names Churches, Football Clubs In Alleged Domkrag Cash-For-Votes Scheme • But Dikabelo Selaledi beats sudden retreat before the UDC People’s Court • Allegations made in sworn statement to SA forensic expert • Balopi says it's hogwash STORY ON PAGE 6 KGATLENG LAND BOARD MPHOKO SLAPS CHOPPIES WITH P440M SHARES BILL AT WAR WITH ITSELF? PAGE 4 Ram laughs off the demand by former Zim vice president and his son PAGE 2 With Standard Chartered you can get short term working capital funding given against a valid Purchase Order. Standard Chartered PO Financing offers your business: • Financing up to 6 months • No financial submission – only 6 months bank statements required Have a valid Purchase Order • Cession of Payment used as collateral It’s simple. We take care of the details to power your business ambition. that needs financing? For more information talk to your Branch, Relationship Manager or No Problem. email [email protected] sc.com/bw Terms and Conditions apply PAGE 2 NEWS WEDNESDAY 28 OCTOBER 2020 THE BOTSWANA GAZETTE interest at the rate of 5 percent per annum from 9 Janu- ary 2019 when they were “unlawfully” divested of their Mphoko Slaps shareholding to-date in full payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Citation Information and Case Links
    Source: Legal Grounds: Reproductive and Sexual Rights in Sub-Saharan African Courts, volume III (Pretoria, PULP, 2017) Entire book online at www.pulp.up.ac.za/legal-compilations/legal-grounds Earlier volumes online via http://reproductiverights.org/legalgrounds Excerpts, earlier volumes and updates: www.law.utoronto.ca/programs/legalgrounds.html FULL CITATION INFORMATION AND CASE LINKS AAA v Registered Trustees (Aga Khan University http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/109369/ Hospital, Nairobi) [2015] eKLR, Civil Case No. 3 of 2013 (High Court of Kenya at Nairobi, Civil Division). AB and Surrogacy Advisory Group v Minister of Social http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2015/580.html Development [2015] ZAGPPHC 580 (North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria, South Africa) AIDS Law Project v Attorney General & 3 Others http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/107033/ [2015] eKLR, Petition No. 97 of 2010 (High Court of Kenya at Nairobi). Attorney General and Others v Tapela and Oth- http://www.saflii.org/bw/cases/BWCA/2015/1.html ers; In re: Attorney General and Others v Mwale- CACGB-096-14, CACGB-076-15 [2015] BWCA 1 (Court of Appeal of the Republic of Botswana at Gaborone) Attorney General of Botswana v Thuto Rammoge & http://www.southernafricalitigationcentre.org/1/wp- 19 Others content/uploads/2016/03/LEGBIBO-CoA-judgment.pdf [2016] CACGB-128-14 (Court of Appeal of the Re- public of Botswana at Gaborone). Baby “A” (suing through her mother, E.A.) and The http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/104234/ Cradle the Children Foundation v Attorney General, Kenyatta National Hospital, and the Registrar of Births and Deaths [2014] eKLR, Petition No.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Marriage and Citizenship: Kalanga Women's Experiences In
    A HISTORY OF MARRIAGE AND CITIZENSHIP: KALANGA WOMEN’S EXPERIENCES IN POST-COLONIAL BOTSWANA UNTIL 2005 BY UNALUDO SECHELE THIS THESIS HAS BEEN SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE FACULTY OF THE HUMANITIES, FOR THE CENTRE FOR AFRICA STUDIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF THE FREE STATE. FEBRUARY 2015 SUPERVISOR: PROF. I.R. PHIMISTER CO-SUPERVISOR: DR D. SPENCE Declaration I declare that the dissertation hereby submitted by me for the Master of Arts degree at the University of the Free State is my own independent work and has not previously been submitted by me at another university/faculty. I furthermore cede copyright of the dissertation in favour of the University of the Free State. Unaludo Sechele ABSTRACT This study examines Kalanga women‟s experiences in relation to marriage and citizenship legislation in Botswana between 1966 and 2005. The analyses of the study are based on legislation affecting all women in Botswana, but are specifically focused on a group of rural women of Kalanga origin. A number of legislations in Botswana affected the Kalanga women, but the emphasis of this study falls on the Citizenship Act (1984), leading to its amendment in 1995, and the Abolition of Marital Power Act (2004). The Citizenship Act (1984) had to be amended because it discriminated against women as it rendered the passing on of citizenship to children patrilineal. The Abolition of Marital Power Act (2004), on the other hand, came about as a result of oppression that married women faced as they did not have rights and were considered minors as per common and customary law.
    [Show full text]
  • Kgosi Sues State for Failing to Prosecute
    THE BOTSWANA GAZEttE WEDNESDAY 27 MAY 2020 KGOSI SUES PAGE 1 STATE FOR FAILING TO PROSECUTE WEDNESDAY 27 MAY 2020 FREE! HIM “Kitso ke maatla” PAGE 4 CASH-STRAPPED COVID-19 KGOSI & RELIEF FOOD PROGRAMME MAY STOP PAGE 6 MAGOSI'S PREMATURE BABY DIES AS SEKGOMA MEMORIAL DOCTOR NEGLECTS 'GUN FIGHT' MOTHER A bureaucratic doctor would not Seven firearms were touch a newly-born preterm baby that had complications when it confiscated in a raid at arrived in its desperate mother’s arms at Sekgoma Memorial a house belonging to Hospital in Serowe, only because the referring doctor at Selebi- former spy boss, Isaac Phikwe Hospital where the baby was born had not notified Kgosi, some time last Sekgoma in advance. Tragically, the baby was buried three days year. Kgosi is staking his later back in Selebi-Phikwe. claim on the weapons, so PAGE 4 are the DISS and MINISTER the DCEC. PROMISES MOBILE DATA STORY ON PAGE 3 PRICE CUT PAGE 5 PAGE 3 PAGE 2 NEWS WEDNESDAY 27 MAY 2020 THE BOTSWANA GAZEttE Gov’t To Go After Renegade Companies • Some continue to retrench employees during SoPE • Security companies top list of renegade employers • Some directors have disappeared without paying employees Muslim devotees wearing face masks as a preventive measure against the spread of the Coronavirus getting the temperature measure done before attending the special prayer to celebrate the Eid-al-Fitr festival marking the end of the Islamic holy fasting month of Ramadan in Gaborone on May 25, 2020. (Pic:MONIRUL BHUIYAN/PRESS PHOTO) LETLHOGILE MPUANG decided to do what they want,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Submitted Under Article 40
    UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant Distr. on civil and GENERAL political rights CCPR/C/BWA/1 2 May 2007 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT Initial report of States parties due in 2001 BOTSWANA* [23 November 2006] * Annexes can be consulted in the files of the Secretariat. GE.07-41511 (E) 070607 CCPR/C/BWA/1 page 2 INITIAL REPORT OF BOTSWANA ON THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS SUBMITTED UNDER ARTICLE 40 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page I. GENERAL ........................................................................................... 1 - 75 4 A. History ........................................................................................ 1 - 12 4 B. Geography ................................................................................... 13 - 16 5 C. Population ................................................................................... 17 - 23 6 D. Economy ..................................................................................... 24 - 46 7 E. Constitutional structure ............................................................... 47 - 52 13 F. Administrative structure ............................................................. 53 - 55 15 G. Legal system ............................................................................... 56 - 75 15 II. INFORMATION CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLES 1 TO 27 OF THE COVENANT ....................................... 76 - 428 18 Article 1 ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Customary Law and Its Implications on the Enjoyment of Human Rights by Women in Southern Africa: a Focus on Botswana, Lesotho and South Africa
    Customary Law and its Implications on the Enjoyment of Human Rights by Women in Southern Africa: A Focus on Botswana, Lesotho and South Africa By Makanatsa Makonese 1 © SADC Lawyers’ Association, 2016 2 List of Abbreviations BPC- Botswana Power Corporation CEDAW- Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women CCA- Customary Court of Appeal CLA- Customary Law Act CPD- Continuous Professional Development CSO- Civil Society Organisation CSW- Commission on the Status of Women ECOSOC- Economic and Social Council (of the UN) ICESCR- International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights LCMPA- Legal Capacity of Married Persons Act LEAD- Legal Education and Development LLS- Lesotho Law Society LSB- Law Society of Botswana LSSA- Law Society of South Africa NGOs- Non-Governmental Organisations NSAs- Non-State Actors SADC- Southern African Development Community SADCLA- SADC Lawyers’ Association SALC- Southern Africa Litigation Centre TCB- Traditional Courts Bill UDHR- Universal Declaration of Human Rights UN- United Nations WLSA- Women and Law in Southern Africa (Research Trust) 3 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................... 3 Part 1: A History of Customary Law and Women’s Rights in Southern Africa .............. 5 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Impact of Customary Law on Women
    [Show full text]
  • Laws of Botswana
    CHAPTER 08:02 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND EVIDENCE ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION PART I Preliminary 1 . Short title 2 . Procedure for offences 3 . Interpretation PART II Criminal Jurisdiction of Courts 4 . Jurisdiction of High Court 5 . Jurisdiction of magistrates' courts 6 . The High Court and magistrates' courts PART III Prosecution at the Public Instance A. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS 7 . Director of Public Prosecutions vested with right of prosecuting all offences 8 . Prosecution by Director of Public Prosecutions in person or by appointed substitute 9 . Presiding officer may appoint prosecutor in certain cases 10 . Attorney-General's power of stopping prosecutions 11 . Power of ordering liberation of persons committed for further examination, sentence or trial 12 . Neither acquittal nor conviction a bar to civil action for damages B. LOCAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 13 . Powers and duties of local public prosecutor PART IV Private Prosecutions 14 . Private prosecution on refusal of Director of Public Prosecutions to prosecute 15 . What other persons entitled to prosecute 16 . Private prosecutions by certain public bodies and persons 17 . Private prosecutor may apply to court for warrant 18 . Certificate of Director of Public Prosecutions that he declines to prosecute 19 . Recognizances to be entered into by private prosecutor 20 . Failure of private prosecutor to appear on appointed day 21 . Mode of conducting private prosecutions 22 . Competency of Director of Public Prosecutions to take up and conduct prosecution at the public instance in all cases 23 . Deposit of money by private prosecutor Copyright Government of Botswana 24 . Costs of private prosecutions 25 . Disposal of fines in certain private prosecutions PART V Prescription of Offences 26 .
    [Show full text]