T-6A Texan II Systems Engineering Case Study Air Force Center for Systems Engineering
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar AFIT Documents 1-1-2010 T-6A Texan II Systems Engineering Case Study Air Force Center for Systems Engineering Bill Kinzig MacAulay-Brown, Inc. Dave Bailey MacAulay-Brown, Inc. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/docs Part of the Systems Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Air Force Center for Systems Engineering; Kinzig, Bill; and Bailey, Dave, "T-6A Texan II Systems Engineering Case Study" (2010). AFIT Documents. 33. https://scholar.afit.edu/docs/33 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in AFIT Documents by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. T-6A TEXAN II SYSTEMS ENGINEERING CASE STUDY Prepared by: Bill Kinzig and Dave Bailey, MacAulay-Brown, Inc. Air Force Center for Systems Engineering at the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) 2950 Hobson Way, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio 45433-7765 T-6A Texan II Engineering Case Study FORWARD At the direction of the former Secretary of the Air Force (SAF), Dr. James G. Roche, the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) established an Air Force Center for Systems Engineering (AFCSE) at its Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB), Ohio, campus in 2002. The AFCSE was tasked to develop case studies focusing on the application of systems engineering principles within various aerospace programs. The intent of these case studies was to examine a broad spectrum of program types and a variety of learning principles using the Friedman-Sage Framework to guide overall analysis. In addition to this case, many other studies are available at the AFCSE web site, such as: • Global Positioning System (GPS) (space system) • Hubble Telescope (space system) • Theater Battle Management Core System (TBMCS) (complex software development) • F-111 Fighter (joint program with significant involvement by the Office of the Secretary of Defense [OSD]) • C-5 Cargo Airlifter (very large, complex aircraft) • International Space Station (highly complex multinational manned space system) • A-10 Attack Aircraft (competitive development of critical technologies) • Global Hawk (intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance air system) These cases support academic instruction on systems engineering within military service academies and at both civilian and military graduate schools, as well as training programs in industry. Each case study is comprised of elements of success, as well as examples of systems engineering decisions that, in hindsight, were not optimal. Both types of examples are useful for learning. Plans exist for future case studies focusing on various space systems, additional aircraft programs, munitions programs, joint Service programs, logistics-led programs, science and technology/laboratory efforts, and a variety of commercial systems. The Department of Defense (DoD) continues to develop and acquire joint complex systems that deliver needed capabilities to our warfighters. Systems engineering is the technical and technical management process that focuses explicitly on delivering and sustaining robust, high-quality, affordable products. The Air Force leadership has collectively stated the need to mature a sound systems engineering process throughout the Air Force. As we uncovered historical facts and conducted key interviews with program managers and chief engineers, both within the Government and those working for the various prime and subcontractors, we concluded that today’s systems programs face similar challenges. Applicable systems engineering principles and the effects of communication and the environment continue to challenge our ability to provide a balanced technical solution. We look forward to your comments on this case study and the others that follow. John Paschall, Col, USAF Deputy Director, Air Force Center for Systems Engineering Air Force Institute of Technology Approved for Public Release; Distribution Unlimited The views expressed in this Case Study are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United Stated Government. Page - ii T-6A Texan II Engineering Case Study ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to acknowledge the following contributors: Lt Col Jeff Borton, USAF (Ret) Lt Com John Garbelotti, Navy Lt Col Lynn Anne Merten Robinson, USAF (Ret) Col John Thompson, USAF Clay Appl Mike Hybl Jay Free Charlie Gebhard Tim Hanson Eric Kivett Jim Klein Karl Kuhlke John Lethert Joel Ligon Forest Oberschlake Gary Stanley Bill Stowe Will Taylor Art Tills Doug Tryloff Lamar Warfield Julia Williams We must point out the invaluable support that was provided by our MacAulay-Brown, Inc. (MacB), colleagues, Charlie Gebhard and Jay Free, who provided extraordinary insight in helping us understand the T-6A Texan II program and systems engineering challenges faced by the program. At AFCSE, we wish to acknowledge the contributions of the AFIT Project Leader, Charles Garland, whose support was integral in guiding us throughout this case study. Dave Bailey Bill Kinzig Page - iii T-6A Texan II Engineering Case Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES .....................................................................1 1.1 GENERAL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROCESS ..................................................................1 1.1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................1 1.1.2 Evolving Systems Engineering Process ....................................................................3 1.1.3 Case Studies ............................................................................................................3 1.1.4 Framework for Analysis ...........................................................................................5 1.2 T-6A TEXAN II MAJOR LEARNING PRINCIPLES AND FRIEDMAN-SAGE MATRIX ..............6 2. T-6A TEXAN II DESCRIPTION .....................................................................................7 2.1 BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................7 2.2 T-6A TEXAN II .............................................................................................................7 2.3 JOINT PRIMARY AIRCRAFT TRAINING SYSTEM (JPATS) ..............................................10 2.4 HISTORY OF HAWKER BEECHCRAFT ............................................................................12 3. T-6A TEXAN II PROGRAM..........................................................................................12 3.1 HISTORY ....................................................................................................................12 3.1.1 Trainer “State of the Union” .................................................................................12 3.1.1.1 Air Force Trainer Master Plan ........................................................................13 3.1.2 Defense Authorization Act......................................................................................14 3.1.2.1 Validated Primary Aircraft Training System (PATS) Statement of Need (SON) …………………………………………………………………………………15 3.1.2.2 JPATS SON ...................................................................................................16 3.1.2.3 JPATS Program Management Directive (PMD) .............................................18 3.1.2.4 Concept Studies .............................................................................................18 3.1.2.5 Joint Statement of Operational Need (JSON)..................................................18 3.1.3 Trainer Aircraft Summit.........................................................................................18 3.1.3.1 Draft Joint System Operational Requirements Document (JSORD) ................19 3.1.3.2 Solicitation for Information ............................................................................19 3.1.3.3 Operational Requirements Document (ORD) Revised ....................................19 3.1.3.4 Revised Department of Defense (DoD) Trainer Master Plan...........................20 3.2 JPATS ACQUISITION ..................................................................................................20 3.2.1 Acquisition Strategy ...............................................................................................20 3.2.2 Initial Partnering ...................................................................................................21 3.2.3 Operational Demonstrations ..................................................................................21 3.2.4 Definition of Non-Developmental...........................................................................21 3.2.5 Change in Acquisition Strategy ..............................................................................21 3.2.5.1 Accommodate for Female Population.............................................................22 3.2.5.2 ORD Number 3 ..............................................................................................22 3.2.6 Draft Request for Proposals (RFP) Developed .......................................................23 3.2.7 Defense Acquisition Pilot Program (DAPP) ...........................................................23 3.2.8 RFP Released ........................................................................................................24 3.2.9 Source