" 7,I7t DRAINAGE MAP of ARIZONA SHOWING PERENNIAL STREAMS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

50 MILES 25 50 KILOMETERS n4I.VLIngt,r10. " 7,i7T L'11,74g NOVI "4,,tgITT EXPLANATION PERENNIAL STREAM--Includes streas that WETLAND--Poorly drained land and shallow 3500 feet ELEVATION CONTOUR—Datum is mean sea level have reaches of interrupted flow during bodies of water that support well- Base flow periods of extreme drought developed emergent or submergent aquatic <3500 feet Unregulated streams at these elevations <10 10-50 50-250 cubic feet per second flora provide habitat exclusively for warm- Flow unregulated water fish species, such as longfin dace <500 acres .„1,2500 acres Unregulated water supply (Agosia chrysogaster) and red shiner Flow regulated <SOO acres >500 acres (Notropis lutrensis) Regulated water supply Base flow mainly or entirely municipal, 3500-5500 feet Streams at these elevations mainly are <500 acres .„ >500 acres industrial, or agricultural wastewater Mainly or entirely supplied by wastewater populated by warm-water fish species EPHEMERAL, INTERMITTENT, OR WASTEWATER €3■ FORMER WETLAND--Now wholly or partly dry 5500-7500 feet Streams at these elevations mainly are STREAM—Flow was perennial prior to populated by cold-water fish species diversion, impoundment, or decline of ground-water levels >7500 feet Streams at these elevations provide habitat exclusively for cold-water MAJOR RESERVOIR THAT REGULATES STREAMFLOW fish species, such as Arizona trout (Salmo apache) and rainbow trout (S. gairdneri) DRAINAGE MAP OF ARIZONA SHOWING PERENNIAL STREAMS AND SOME IMPORTANT WETLANDS COMPILED BY D. E BROWN. ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT AND N. a CARMONY AND R. M. TURNER, U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1 978 Railroads of Arizona--Volume 1, The southern roads: GLOSSARY Davis, N. H., 1897, Letter to Capt. Benjamin C. Cutler, June 5, 1864, in The Myrick, D. F., 1975, War of the Rebellion-A compilation of the official records of the Union Berkeley, Calif., Howell-North Books, 477 p. and Confederate Armies: Secretary of War, ser. 1, v. 50, pt. II, Ohnesorgen, William, 1929, Reminiscences: Tucson, Arizona Hist. Soc. unpub. ms.. Op. BASE FLOW. Sustained or dry-weather flow; the minimum flow of a perennial p. 869-872. Olmstead, F. H., 1919, Gila River flood control-A report on flood control of stream. The base flow of unregulated perennial streams in Arizona is Davis recommended that the proposed Fort Goodwin be /orated at "La . the upper Gila the Gila River in Graham County, Arizona: U.S. 65th Cong., 3d sans.. ground-water discharge into a stream channel and the volume generally Cienega Grande near the present community of Geronimo on River. The marshes in this area have now largely disappeared. S. Doc. 436, 94 p. does not vary greatly from year to year. for railroad routes, in Explora- Dellenbaugh, F. S., 1908, A canyon voyage: New York, G. P. Putnam's Sons, Parke, J. G., 1857, Report of explorations CIENEGA. A marsh, bog, or miry place. practicable and economical route 277 p. tions and surveys to ascertain the most GROUND WATER. Water in the ground that is in the zone of saturation, from for a railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean: U.S. Dellenbaugh (p. 244-246) reported no flow in Kanab Creek for many miles which wells and springs are supplied. 33d Cong., 2d sess., S. Ex. Doc. 78, v. 7, 469 p. REACH. The length of part of a stream channel. below the settlement of Kanab, Utah, in September 1872. River, Pattie, J. O., 1905, The personal narrative of James O. Pattie, in Volume 18, FLOW. Flow that is manipulated by man. The discharge patterns, DiPeso, C. C., 1951, The Babocomari Village site on the Babocomari REGULATED p. Early western travels, 1748-1846, R. G. Thwaites, ed.: Cleveland, Ohio, temperatures, and suspended-sediment loads of regulated streams may southeastern Arizona: Dragoon, Ariz., The Amerind Found., Inc., 248 John E. Durivage, in Southern Arthur H. Clark Co., 379 p. create an environment unfavorable to the native aquatic fauna. Durivage, J. E., 1937, Letters and journal of trails to California in 1849, R. P. Bieber, ed.: Glendale, Ealif., V. Peterson, C. S., 1973, Take up your mission-Mormon colonizing along the RESERVOIR. A pond, lake, or basin--either natural or artificial--used for Arizona Univ. Press, 309 p. Arthur H. Clark Co., Southwest Mist. Ser., v. 5, p. 159-255. Little Colorado River, 1870-1900: Tucson, storage, regulation, and control of water. The reservoirs shown on th Marshall, J. T., Jr., and Monson, Gale, 1964, The birds of Durivage (p. 205-227) described streams and watering places in southern Phillips, A. R., map in green are artificial. Arizona: Tucson, Arizona Univ. Press, 212 p. STREAM. A general term for a body of flowing water. In hydrology the term Arizona during May and June 1849. on the southwestern trail, , Powell, H. M. T., 1931, The Santa Fe trail to California, 1849-1852: San generally is applied to the water flowing in a natural channel as dis- Eccleston, Robert, 1950, Overland to California 1849, G. P. Hammond and E. H. Howes, eds.: Berkeley, California Univ. Francisco, Grabhorn Press, 272 p. tinct from a canal. Powell, J. W., 1874, Reports of the exploration in 1873 of the Colorado of the Streams in natural channels may be classified as follows: Press, 256 p. Fort Leavenworth West and its tributaries: Washington, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 36 p. Relation to time. Emory, W. H., 1848, Notes of a military reconnaissance, from in Missouri, to San Diego in California, including part of Arkansas, Del 1879, Report on the arid lands of the United States, with a more PERENNIAL. One that flows continuously. detailed account of the lands of Utah: Washington, U.S. Govt. Printing INTERMITTENT. One that flows only at certain times of the yea Morte, and Gila Rivers: U.S. 30th Gong., 1st sess., Ex. Doc. 41, 614 p. Office, 195 p. when it receives water from springs or from some surface The report is the first detailed investigation of the Gila River from Pumpelly, Raphael, 1870, Across America and Asia: New York, Leopoldt and source, such as melting snow at high elevations. its headwaters to its mouth. 454 p. that flows only in direct response to precipi- 1857, Report on the United States and Mexican Boundary Survey (in Holt, EPHEMERAL. One Reid's tramp. Selma, Ala., John Hardy and Co., 237 p. tation and whose channel is at all times above the water two volumes): U.S. 34th Gong., 1st sess., S. Ex. Doc. 108. Reid, J. C., 1858, ., 4 p. Roeske, R. H., and Werrell, W. L., 1973, Hydrologic conditions in the San table. Etz, D. B., 1938, Reminiscences: Tucson, Arizona Hist. Soc. unpub. ms in Mexican gold trail, Pedro River valley, Arizona, 1971: Arizona Water Comm. Bull. 4, 76 p. Relation to space. Evans, G. W. B., 1945, The journal of G. W. B. Evans, Ross, C. P., 1923, The lower Gila region, Arizona: U.S. Geol. Survey Water- CONTINUOUS. One that does not have interruption in space. G. S. Dumke, ed.: San Marino, Calif., Huntington Library, 340 p. Supply Paper 498, 237 p. INTERRUPTED. One that contains alternating reaches that are Fergusson, Major David, 1862, Cultivated fields in and about Tucson: Tucson, Rothrock, J. T., 1875, Preliminary and general botanical report, with remarks either perennial, intermittent, or ephemeral. Arizona Mist. Soc. map, scale 1:3600. upon the general topography of the region traversed in New Mexico and WASTEWATER. Water that was used initially for agricultural, industrial, or ,*Fish, Joseph, 1970, Life and times of Joseph Fish, Mormon pioneer, J. H. Arizona--its climatology, forage, plants, timber, irrigation and sanitary purposes and that was subsequently lost to the user or dis- Krenkel, ed.: Danville, Ill., Interstate Printers, 543 p. municipal conditions, in Annual report upon the geographical explorations and charged as being superfluous. Wastewater generally contains contam- In July 1879 Fish (p. 193-1941 found no flow in the Little Colorado surveys west of the 100th meridian: Washington, U.S. Govt. Printing inating waste products, which may create an environment unfavorable to River from near present-day Winslow to near the mouth of Moenkopi Wash. Graham, J. D., 1852, Report of Lieutenant Colonel Graham on the subject of the Office, p. 117-129. the native aquatic fauna. H. C., 1942, Rainfall and runoff in the upper Santa Cruz River and shallow bodies of water that support well- boundary line between the United States and Mexico: U.S. 32d Gong., 1st Schwalen, WETLAND. Poorly drained land Univ., Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 95, 472 P. flora. Most of the wetlands sess., Ex. Doc. 121, 250 P. drainage basin: Arizona developed emergent or submergent aquatic Shaw, R. J., 1957, Ground water supplies of Santa Cruz provide important habitat for waterfowl. The floral Gray, A. B., 1963, The A. B. Gray report--Survey of a route for the Southern Schwalen, H. C., and shown on this map Expt. Sta. Bull. 288, 119 p. (termed marshes or cien gas Pacific Railroad on the 32nd Parallel-L. R. Bailey, ed.: Los Angeles, Valley: Arizona Univ., Agr. characteristics of most of the former wetlands A. T., 1917, Ground water in the San Simon Valley, Arizona and in the early literature) shown on the map are poorly documented. Westernlore Press, 240 p. Schwennesen, * Gregory, H. E., 1916, The Navajo country: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply ' New Mexico: U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 425-A, p. 1-23. Paper 380, 219 P. Schwennesen (p. 61 described the San Simon Cienega and stated that the 1917, Geology of the Navajo country: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper outflow from the cienega into San Simon Creek was nearly perennial. Gila and San Carlos CONVERSION FACTORS 93, 161 p.
Recommended publications
  • Arizona by Ric Windmiller 3
    THE COCHISE QUARTERLY Volume 1 Number 2 June, 1971 CONTENTS Early Hunters and Gatherers in Southeastern Arizona by Ric Windmiller 3 From Rocks to Gadgets A History of Cochise County, Arizona by Carl Trischka 16 A Cochise Culture Human Skeleton From Southeastern Arizona by Kenneth R. McWilliams 24 Cover designed by Ray Levra, Cochise College A Publication of the Cochise County Historical and Archaeological Society P. O. Box 207 Pearce, Arizona 85625 2 EARLY HUNTERS AND GATHERERS IN SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA* By Ric Windmiller Assistant Archaeologist, Arizona State Museum, University of Arizona During the summer, 1970, the Arizona State Museum, in co- operation with the State Highway Department and Cochise County, excavated an ancient pre-pottery archaeological site and remains of a mammoth near Double Adobe, Arizona.. Although highway salvage archaeology has been carried out in the state since 1955, last sum- mer's work on Whitewater Draw, near Double Adobe, represented the first time that either the site of early hunters and gatherers or re- mains of extinct mammoth had been recovered through the salvage program. In addition, excavation of the pre-pottery Cochise culture site on a new highway right-of-way has revealed vital evidence for the reconstruction of prehistoric life-ways in southeastern Arizona, an area that is little known archaeologically, yet which has produced evidence to indicate that it was early one of the most important areas for the development of and a settled way of life in the Southwest. \ Early Big Game Hunters Southeastern Arizona is also important as the area in which the first finds in North America of extinct faunal remains overlying cul- tural evidences of man were scientifically excavated.
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIES LIST (List Follows the Newest AOU Order)
    Southeast Arizona The Nature Conservancy Legacy Club August 11- 18, 2012 SPECIES LIST (List follows the newest AOU order) Black-bellied Whistling-Duck––4 in the wetland near Elgin, whistling as they flew Mexican Duck (Mallard)––at the Elgin wetland and Willcox’s “Lake Cochise” Northern Shoveler––a few lounging at the Willcox ponds Ruddy Duck––one male and a female, paddling behind the reeds at Willcox golf pond Scaled Quail––a few glimpsed near Whitewater Draw, seen well as they crossed the road Gambel’s Quail––small groups seen almost daily Montezuma Quail––heard only, whistling in Huachuca Canyon, what a tease! Pied-billed Grebe––1 at the Willcox golf pond Great Blue Heron––at the Elgin wetland and flying behind Casa de San Pedro Black-crowned Night-Heron––1 immature flushed at the Willcox golf pond White-faced Ibis––2 distant birds at Whitewater and others flying over the Willcox ponds Black Vulture––a single perched on the cliff above Patagonia’s roadside rest, great scope views for all. Turkey Vulture––throughout White-tailed Kite––3 in the Elgin grasslands, what a thrill to see them at dusk, after a very full day Northern Harrier––1 in the Elgin grasslands Cooper’s Hawk––1 near Patagonia-Sonoita Creek Preserve, one very close by as we passed it on the road leaving Tucson Gray Hawk––heard only in several locations in the lowlands. With ample time in two of its favorite haunts, we were surprised not to get “cracking” views. Swainson’s Hawk––fairly common along the roadsides on most days, particularly noticeable near Portal.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS Open-File Report 2009-1269, Appendix 1
    Appendix 1. Summary of location, basin, and hydrological-regime characteristics for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging stations in Arizona and parts of adjacent states that were used to calibrate hydrological-regime models [Hydrologic provinces: 1, Plateau Uplands; 2, Central Highlands; 3, Basin and Range Lowlands; e, value not present in database and was estimated for the purpose of model development] Average percent of Latitude, Longitude, Site Complete Number of Percent of year with Hydrologic decimal decimal Hydrologic altitude, Drainage area, years of perennial years no flow, Identifier Name unit code degrees degrees province feet square miles record years perennial 1950-2005 09379050 LUKACHUKAI CREEK NEAR 14080204 36.47750 109.35010 1 5,750 160e 5 1 20% 2% LUKACHUKAI, AZ 09379180 LAGUNA CREEK AT DENNEHOTSO, 14080204 36.85389 109.84595 1 4,985 414.0 9 0 0% 39% AZ 09379200 CHINLE CREEK NEAR MEXICAN 14080204 36.94389 109.71067 1 4,720 3,650.0 41 0 0% 15% WATER, AZ 09382000 PARIA RIVER AT LEES FERRY, AZ 14070007 36.87221 111.59461 1 3,124 1,410.0 56 56 100% 0% 09383200 LEE VALLEY CR AB LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.50204 1 9,440e 1.3 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383220 LEE VALLEY CREEK TRIBUTARY 15020001 33.93894 109.50204 1 9,440e 0.5 6 0 0% 49% NEAR GREER, ARIZ. 09383250 LEE VALLEY CR BL LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.49787 1 9,400e 1.9 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383400 LITTLE COLORADO RIVER AT GREER, 15020001 34.01671 109.45731 1 8,283 29.1 22 22 100% 0% ARIZ.
    [Show full text]
  • Roundtail Chub Repatriated to the Blue River
    Volume 1 | Issue 2 | Summer 2015 Roundtail Chub Repatriated to the Blue River Inside this issue: With a fish exclusion barrier in place and a marked decline of catfish, the time was #TRENDINGNOW ................. 2 right for stocking Roundtail Chub into a remote eastern Arizona stream. New Initiative Launched for Southwest Native Trout.......... 2 On April 30, 2015, the Reclamation, and Marsh and Blue River. A total of 222 AZ 6-Species Conservation Department stocked 876 Associates LLC embarked on a Roundtail Chub were Agreement Renewal .............. 2 juvenile Roundtail Chub from mission to find, collect and stocked into the Blue River. IN THE FIELD ........................ 3 ARCC into the Blue River near bring into captivity some During annual monitoring, Recent and Upcoming AZGFD- the Juan Miller Crossing. Roundtail Chub for captive led Activities ........................... 3 five months later, Additional augmentation propagation from the nearest- Department staff captured Spikedace Stocked into Spring stockings to enhance the genetic neighbor population in Eagle Creek ..................................... 3 42 of the stocked chub, representation of the Blue River Creek. The Aquatic Research some of which had travelled BACK AT THE PONDS .......... 4 Roundtail Chub will be and Conservation Center as far as seven miles Native Fish Identification performed later this year. (ARCC) held and raised the upstream from the stocking Workshop at ARCC................ 4 offspring of those chub for Stockings will continue for the location. future stocking into the Blue next several years until that River. population is established in the Department biologists conducted annual Blue River and genetically In 2012, the partners delivered monitoring in subsequent mimics the wild source captive-raised juvenile years, capturing three chub population.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Flows and Water Demands in Arizona
    Environmental Flows and Water A University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center Project Demands in Arizona ater is an increasingly scarce resource and is essential for Arizona’s future. Figure 1. Elements of Environmental Flow WWith Arizona’s population growth and Occurring in Seasonal Hydrographs continued drought, citizens and water managers have been taking a closer look at water supplies in the state. Municipal, industrial, and agricul- tural water users are well-represented demand sectors, but water supplies and management to benefit the environment are not often consid- ered. This bulletin explains environmental water demands in Arizona and introduces information essential for considering environmental water demands in water management discussions. Considering water for the environment is impor- tant because humans have an interconnected and interdependent relationship with the envi- ronment. Nature provides us recreation oppor- tunities, economic benefits, and water supplies Data Source: to sustain our communities. USGS stream gage data Figure 2: Human Demand and Current Flow in Arizona Environmental water demands (or environmental flow) (circle size indicates relative amount of water) refers to how much water is needed in a watercourse to sustain a healthy ecosystem. Defining environmental water demand goes beyond the ecology and hydrol- Maximum ogy of a system and should include consideration for Flows how much water is required to achieve an agreed Industrial 40.8 maf Industrial SW Municipal upon level of river health, as determined by the GW 1% GW 8% water-using community. Arizona’s native ani- 4% mals and plants depend upon dynamic flows commonly described according to the natural Municipal SW flow regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Cienegas Vanishing Climax Communities of the American
    Hendrickson and Minckley Cienegas of the American Southwest 131 Abstract Cienegas The term cienega is here applied to mid-elevation (1,000-2,000 m) wetlands characterized by permanently saturated, highly organic, reducing soils. A depauperate Vanishing Climax flora dominated by low sedges highly adapted to such soils characterizes these habitats. Progression to cienega is Communities of the dependent on a complex association of factors most likely found in headwater areas. Once achieved, the community American Southwest appears stable and persistent since paleoecological data indicate long periods of cienega conditions, with infre- quent cycles of incision. We hypothesize the cienega to be an aquatic climax community. Cienegas and other marsh- land habitats have decreased greatly in Arizona in the Dean A. Hendrickson past century. Cultural impacts have been diverse and not Department of Zoology, well documented. While factors such as grazing and Arizona State University streambed modifications contributed to their destruction, the role of climate must also be considered. Cienega con- and ditions could be restored at historic sites by provision of ' constant water supply and amelioration of catastrophic W. L. Minckley flooding events. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Dexter Fish Hatchery Introduction and Department of Zoology Written accounts and photographs of early explorers Arizona State University and settlers (e.g., Hastings and Turner, 1965) indicate that most pre-1890 aquatic habitats in southeastern Arizona were different from what they are today. Sandy, barren streambeds (Interior Strands of Minckley and Brown, 1982) now lie entrenched between vertical walls many meters below dry valley surfaces. These same streams prior to 1880 coursed unincised across alluvial fills in shallow, braided channels, often through lush marshes.
    [Show full text]
  • Water, Summer 2008
    Restoring Connections Vol. 11 Issue 2 Summer 2008 Newsletter of the Sky Island Alliance In this issue: A River Runs Beneath It by Randy Serraglio 4 Time and the Aquifer: Models and Long-term Thinking Water… by Julia Fonseca 5 Street and Public Rights-of-Way: Community Corridors of Heat & Dehydration OR Green Belts of Coolness & Rehydration by Brad Lancaster 6 A New Path for Water Use by Melissa Lamberton 7 The Power of Water by Janice Przybyl 8 Our special pull-out section on Ciénegas Monitoring Water with Remote Cameras by Sergio Avila 9 Waste Water / Holy Water by Ken Lamberton 10 Coyote Wells by Julia Fonseca 12 Finding Water in the Desert by Gary Williams 12 H2Oly Stories by Doug Bland 13 Restaurant Review: The Adobe Café & Bakery by Mary Rakestraw 14 Volunteers Make It Happen Rio Saracachi at Rancho Agua Fria in Sonora. by Sarah Williams 16 From the Director’s Desk: Swimming Holes and Groundwater by Matt Skroch, Executive Director Rivers and springs have been used to our several decades, or centuries, the water table will agricultural advantage for 12,000 years here, once again seep upwards to ground level, and though unsustainable groundwater mining is a those low points on the landscape we call rivers relatively new phenomena. We’ve discovered will flow once again. other temporary ways around the problem of increasing water scarcity — billions of dollars Either choice will eventually lead nature back to spent to pump water uphill for 330 miles being better days. The difference being that one choice Few experiences compare to the exhilaration of one spectacular example.
    [Show full text]
  • Eyec Sail Dzan
    Desert Plants, Volume 6, Number 3 (1984) Item Type Article Authors Hendrickson, Dean A.; Minckley, W. L. Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 27/09/2021 19:02:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552226 Desert Volume 6. Number 3. 1984. (Issued early 1985) Published by The University of Arizona at the Plants Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum eyec sail Dzan Ciénegas Vanishing Climax Communities of the American Southwest Dean A. Hendrickson and W. L. Minckley O'Donnell Ciénega in Arizona's upper San Pedro basin, now in the Canelo Hills Ciénega Preserve of the Nature Conservancy. Ciénegas of the American Southwest have all but vanished due to environmental changes brought about by man. Being well- watered sites surrounded by dry lands variously classified as "desert," "arid," or "semi- arid," they were of extreme importance to pre- historic and modern Homo sapiens, animals and plants of the Desert Southwest. Photograph by Fritz jandrey. 130 Desert Plants 6(3) 1984 (issued early 1985) Desert Plants Volume 6. Number 3. (Issued early 1985) Published by The University of Arizona A quarterly journal devoted to broadening knowledge of plants indigenous or adaptable to arid and sub -arid regions, P.O. Box AB, Superior, Arizona 85273 to studying the growth thereof and to encouraging an appre- ciation of these as valued components of the landscape. The Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum at Superior, Arizona, is sponsored by The Arizona State Parks Board, The Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum, Inc., and The University of Arizona Frank S.
    [Show full text]
  • San Pedro River Study Area Wild and Scenic River Eligibility Report
    Prepared by the USDI Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, Tucson Field Office May 2016 The BLM manages more than 245 million acres of public land, the most of any Federal agency. This land, known as the National System of Public Lands, is primarily located in 12 Western states, including Alaska. The BLM also administers 700 million acres of sub-surface mineral estate throughout the nation. The BLM's mission is to manage and conserve the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations under our mandate of multiple-use and sustained yield. Cover photo – San Pedro River near Charleston courtesy of BLM/Bob Wick 2 San Pedro River Wild and Scenic River Study Area Eligibility Report This document consolidates resource information about the San Pedro River and one of its key tributaries, the Babocomari River. The purpose of this document is to provide a basis for reassessing the eligibility and suitability for inclusion of the San Pedro River and related free- flowing conditions and outstandingly remarkable river values into the National Wild and Scenic River System. I. BACKGROUND: The San Pedro River Wild and Scenic River Study Area Eligibility Report describes the information considered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in the eligibility, and tentative re-classification of the San Pedro River for suitability analysis in the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area (SPRNCA) Resource Management Plan (RMP). The SPRNCA was established by Public Law (P.L.) 100-696 on Nov. 18, 1988 to preserve, protect, and enhance the aquatic, wildlife, archaeological, paleontological, scientific, cultural, educational, and recreational resources in the conservation area.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Assessment Units
    APPENDIX A ASSESSMENT UNITS SURFACE WATER REACH DESCRIPTION REACH/LAKE NUM WATERSHED Agua Fria River 341853.9 / 1120358.6 - 341804.8 / 15070102-023 Middle Gila 1120319.2 Agua Fria River State Route 169 - Yarber Wash 15070102-031B Middle Gila Alamo 15030204-0040A Bill Williams Alum Gulch Headwaters - 312820/1104351 15050301-561A Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312820 / 1104351 - 312917 / 1104425 15050301-561B Santa Cruz Alum Gulch 312917 / 1104425 - Sonoita Creek 15050301-561C Santa Cruz Alvord Park Lake 15060106B-0050 Middle Gila American Gulch Headwaters - No. Gila Co. WWTP 15060203-448A Verde River American Gulch No. Gila County WWTP - East Verde River 15060203-448B Verde River Apache Lake 15060106A-0070 Salt River Aravaipa Creek Aravaipa Cyn Wilderness - San Pedro River 15050203-004C San Pedro Aravaipa Creek Stowe Gulch - end Aravaipa C 15050203-004B San Pedro Arivaca Cienega 15050304-0001 Santa Cruz Arivaca Creek Headwaters - Puertocito/Alta Wash 15050304-008 Santa Cruz Arivaca Lake 15050304-0080 Santa Cruz Arnett Creek Headwaters - Queen Creek 15050100-1818 Middle Gila Arrastra Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-848 Middle Gila Ashurst Lake 15020015-0090 Little Colorado Aspen Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-769 Verde River Babbit Spring Wash Headwaters - Upper Lake Mary 15020015-210 Little Colorado Babocomari River Banning Creek - San Pedro River 15050202-004 San Pedro Bannon Creek Headwaters - Granite Creek 15060202-774 Verde River Barbershop Canyon Creek Headwaters - East Clear Creek 15020008-537 Little Colorado Bartlett Lake 15060203-0110 Verde River Bear Canyon Lake 15020008-0130 Little Colorado Bear Creek Headwaters - Turkey Creek 15070102-046 Middle Gila Bear Wallow Creek N. and S. Forks Bear Wallow - Indian Res.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Insurance Study Vol. 1
    SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, ARIZONA AND INCORPORATED AREAS VOLUME 1 OF 3 Community Community Name Number SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) 040090 NOGALES, CITY OF 040091 PATAGONIA, TOWN OF 040092 Santa Cruz County EFFECTIVE: DECEMBER 2, 2011 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 04023CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS report may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels for this community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map (FBFM) panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone(s) New Zone A1 through A30 AE B X C X Initial Countywide FIS Report Effective Date: December 2, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS – VOLUME 1 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Draft April 2008 Drought Monitor Report.Pub
    Arizona Drought Monitor Report April 2008 Short-term Drought Status Long-term Drought Status Short-term Update Long-term Update The short-term drought situation is unchanged for most of Arizona Long-term drought conditions have also shown some improvement from last month, with 11 of 15 watersheds showing no drought due to due to the wet winter across most of the state. In north central Arizona, the very wet early winter, November through February. Last month, the Verde, Agua Fria, and Little Colorado have all improved from se- four watersheds in southeastern Arizona were abnormally dry, and vere to moderate drought, while the Salt, upper Gila, and San Pedro this month two of them, Willcox Playa and Whitewater Draw, have watersheds have improved from moderate drought to abnormally dry. been downgraded to moderate drought. Many locations in southeast- Only Whitewater Draw in southeastern Arizona has degraded from ern Arizona observed less than 50% of average precipitation over the abnormally dry to moderate drought. The long-term map reflects the past three months. The short-term map reflects precipitation in the previous 2-, 3-, and 4-year periods of precipitation and streamflow, previous 3-, 6-, and 12-month periods, which impacts range condi- which affects forest health and groundwater supplies. Although a sin- tions, including reduced grassland productivity. Short-term drought gle very wet year can improve the situation, it cannot completely offset conditions can change if precipitation in the previous 12 months is multiple dry years, which is why the long-term situation continues to significantly wetter or drier than the 30+ year averages.
    [Show full text]