Phd Thesis Identification of the Archaeal Regulatory Network in DNA Damage Response

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phd Thesis Identification of the Archaeal Regulatory Network in DNA Damage Response U N I V E R S I T Y O F C O P E N H A G E N F A C U L T Y O F S C I E N C E PhD Thesis Xu Feng Identification of the archaeal regulatory network in DNA damage response Supervisor: Qunxin She Data of Submission: 12 June 2018 Name of department: Department of Biology Author(s): Xu Feng Title and subtitle: Identification of the archaeal regulatory network in DNA damage response Topic description: The role of a paralog of TFB/TFIIB protein and an orthologue of Orc1/Cdc6 protein during DNA damage-induced transcriptional responses in Sulfolobus islandicus Rey15A was investigated. Supervisor: Qunxin She Submitted on: 12 June 2018 This thesis has been submitted to the PhD School of the Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen The cover image is an integrated model of the regulatory network of DNA damage response in Sulfolobus. PREFACE The thesis entitled ‘Identification of the archaeal regulatory network in DNA damage response’ was submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen. The work presented in the thesis was carried on at the Danish Archaea Center (DAC), Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, under the supervision of Dr. Qunxin She and with financial support from Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF-4181- 00274) and China Scholarship Council (CSC). The thesis starts with a general overview of mechanisms employed by three domains of life to deal with DNA damage, including DNA damage repair and tolerance pathways. It is followed by an introduction of the current knowledge about the DNA damage response (DDR) across the tree of life. Subsequently, the results obtained during my PhD study are summarized. At last, the thesis goes to its end with the discussion of the results and perspectives for future research. Two papers are included at the end of the thesis, with the first one addressing the function of TFB3 and the second focusing on the functional study of Orc1-2 during DDR regulation in Sulfolobus islandicus Rey15A. These papers are given below: Xu Feng, Mengmeng Sun, Wenyuan Han, Yun Xiang Liang, Qunxin She; A transcriptional factor B paralog functions as an activator to DNA damage-responsive expression in archaea, Nucleic Acids Research, gky236, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky236 Mengmeng Sun, Xu Feng, Zhenzhen Liu, Wenyuan Han, Yun Xiang Liang, Qunxin She; An Orc1/Cdc6 ortholog functions as a key regulator in the DNA damage response in Archaea, Nucleic Acids Research, gky487, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky487 I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS It has been a wonderful time during my stay in Denmark and I would like to say thanks to everybody that has supported me here. Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Dr. Qunxin She for his support during my PhD study. His guidance has enlightened me in the past years and will be the most valuable thing for my scientific career. I am grateful to all my current and former labmates in the Danish Archaea Centre and the Molecular Biology of Archaea Lab in Wuhan including Yunxiang Liang, Roger Garrett, Xu Peng, Yongmei Hu, Nan Peng, Yuxia Mei, Zhengjun Chen, Ling Deng, Changyi Zhang, Wenyuan Han, Wenfang Peng, Fei He, Daniel Stiefler-Jensen, Mariana Awayez, Thi Ngoc Hien Phan, Soley Gudbergsdottir, Carlos Leon, Laura Alvarez, Dongqing Jiang, Yingjun Li, Min Ren, Wenqing She, Jingzhong Lin, Yan Zhang, Mingxia Feng, Mengmeng Sun, Tong Guo, Anders Lynge Kjeldsen, Yuvaraj Bhoobalan, Anders Fuglsang, Pavlos Papathanasiou, Anne Louise Grøn Jensen, Weijia Zhang, Zhenzhen Liu and Saifu Pan. It has been a wonderful experience working together with them. My sincere thanks also go to Dr. Li Huang and all the lab members in his lab for their support during my stay in Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Science at Beijing. My special thanks are dedicated to my best friends including Yingwei Feng, Liuquan Feng, Bin Li, Zhengkun Kuang, Jun Wang, Qishan Zhang and Kaisong Huang. Thanks to them for being there through all those tough times in my life. Last, and most importantly, I would like to express my deep gratitude to all my beloved family members, especially my wife (Jianglan Liao) and my son (Muxin Feng) for their unconditional love and support. II TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ........................................................................................................................ I Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... II Table of contents ...................................................................................................... III Summary ................................................................................................................... V Sammendrag ........................................................................................................... VII Abstracts .................................................................................................................. IX Abbreviations ........................................................................................................... X Objectives ............................................................................................................... XII Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 Universal strategies for DNA damage removal .................................................................................. 2 Direct reversal of DNA damage ......................................................................................................... 3 Excision of DNA damage ................................................................................................................... 5 Repair of double strand DNA breaks ................................................................................................ 13 DNA damage tolerance by Translesion DNA synthesis ................................................................... 16 DNA damage response in three domains of Life .............................................................................. 19 ATM/ATR mediated DNA damage signaling pathways in Eukarya ................................................ 19 Multilayer regulations of SOS response in Bacteria ......................................................................... 23 Cellular responses towards DNA damage in Archaea ...................................................................... 26 Transcriptional regulation in Archaea .............................................................................................. 30 Summary of the results .......................................................................................... 33 TFB3 functions as a transcriptional activator for DNA transfer pathway ........................................ 33 Orc1-2 functions as a global regulator essential for DDR in Sulfolobus .......................................... 35 Discussions and future perspectives .................................................................... 38 III References .............................................................................................................. 41 IV SUMMARY DNA damage response (DDR) is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity in all three domains of life, and the process is controlled by evolutionarily unrelated factors in Bacteria and in Eukarya. While DDR is primarily mediated by cleavage of the global repressor, LexA in the former, the process in the latter is mainly orchestrated by two evolutionally conserved kinases, ATM/ATR. Strikingly, none of these DDR regulators have a homologue in Archaea. As a result, it remains elusive as to how organisms in Archaea coordinate cellular processes in response to DNA damage signal (s). Nevertheless, investigation of genome expression upon UV light exposure in Sulfolobus species revealed a number of differentially expressed genes including genes encoding a paralogue of TFB protein (TFB3) and an orthologue of Orc1/Cdc6 protein (Orc1-2). Here, we apply a combination of genetic, biochemical, transcriptome and phylogenetic analysis to investigate their possible roles in archaeal DDR using Sulfolobus islandicus REY15A as the model. Firstly, we constructed tfb3 gene deletion mutant and the transcriptome analysis of the resulting mutant (∆tfb3) revealed that TFB3 is essential for the transcriptional activation of a subset of DDR genes. Phenotypic characterization of ∆tfb3 showed that the mutant loses its ability to form cell aggregates upon DNA damage and is moderately sensitive to DNA damage. Interestingly, CHIP-qPCR analysis showed that TFB3 specifically binds to the promoter region of TFB3-dependent genes, suggesting that TFB3 directly modulates the transcriptional process upon DNA damage. Further, mutagenesis of the TFB3 protein and subsequent functional analysis indicated that the N terminal Zn ribbon and C terminal Coiled-Coil motif are essential for its function in the transcriptional activation. Furthermore, the phylogenetic analysis revealed a co-evolution of TFB3 with its target system (Ced, the Crenarchaeal system for exchange of DNA), suggesting that the TFB3- mediated transcriptional regulation may represent a well conserved DDR regulatory circuit for intercellular DNA transfer in Crenarchaeota. Then, we showed that the previously constructed orc1-2 deletion mutant (∆orc1-2) is hypersensitive to NQO treatment and the transcriptome analysis of the mutant revealed that V Orc1-2 is essential for the global
Recommended publications
  • Proquest Dissertations
    Division of Mycobacterial Research National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill London RecA expression and DNA damage in mycobacteria Nicola A Thomas June 1998 A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science, University College of London. ProQuest Number: U642358 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U642358 Published by ProQuest LLC(2015). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 A bstr a ct Bacterial responses to DNA damage are highly conserved. One system, the SOS response, involves the co-ordinately induced expression of over 20 unlinked genes. The RecA protein plays a central role in the regulation of this response via its interaction with a repressor protein, LexA. The recA gene of Mycobacterium tuberculosis has previously been cloned and sequenced (Davis et al, 1991) and a LexA homologue has recently been identified (Movahedzadeh, 1996). The intracellular lifestyle of pathogenic mycobacteria constantly exposes them to hostile agents such as hydrogen peroxide. Consequently, the response of mycobacteria to DNA damage is of great interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Canonical Functions of the Bacterial Sos Response
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2019 Non-Canonical Functions Of The aB cterial Sos Response Amanda Samuels University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Microbiology Commons Recommended Citation Samuels, Amanda, "Non-Canonical Functions Of The aB cterial Sos Response" (2019). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3253. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3253 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3253 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Non-Canonical Functions Of The aB cterial Sos Response Abstract DNA damage is a pervasive environmental threat, as such, most bacteria encode a network of genes called the SOS response that is poised to combat genotoxic stress. In the absence of DNA damage, the SOS response is repressed by LexA, a repressor-protease. In the presence of DNA damage, LexA undergoes a self-cleavage reaction relieving repression of SOS-controlled effector genes that promote bacterial survival. However, depending on the bacterial species, the SOS response has an expanded role beyond DNA repair, regulating genes involved in mutagenesis, virulence, persistence, and inter-species competition. Despite a plethora of research describing the significant consequences of the SOS response, it remains unknown what physiologic environments induce and require the SOS response for bacterial survival. In Chapter 2, we utilize a commensal E. coli strain, MP1, and established that the SOS response is critical for sustained colonization of the murine gut. Significantly, in evaluating the origin of the genotoxic stress, we found that the SOS response was nonessential for successful colonization in the absence of the endogenous gut microbiome, suggesting that competing microbes might be the source of genotoxic stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Analysis of the Reca Gene and SOS Box of the Purple Non-Sulfur Bacterium Rhodopseudomonas Palustris No
    Microbiology (1999), 145, 1275-1 285 Printed in Great Britain Molecular analysis of the recA gene and SOS box of the purple non-sulfur bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris no. 7 Valerie Dumay,t Masayuki lnui and Hideaki Yukawa Author for correspondence: Hideaki Yukawa. Tel: +81 774 75 2308. Fax: + 81 774 75 2321. e-mail : yukawa(&rite.or.jp ~~~ ~~ Molecular Microbiology The red gene of the purple non-sulfur bacterium Rhodopseudomonas and Research palustris no. 7 was isolated by a PCR-based method and sequenced. The Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth, complete nucleotide sequence consists of 1089 bp encoding a polypeptide of 9-2 Kizugawadai, Kizu-cho, 363 amino acids which is most closely related to the RecA proteins from Soraku-gun, Kyoto 619- species of Rhizobiaceae and Rhodospirillaceae. A recA-deficient strain of R. 0292, Japan palustris no. 7 was obtained by gene replacement. As expected, this strain exhibited increased sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. Transcriptional fusions of the recA promoter region to lacZ confirmed that the R. palustris no. 7 recA gene is inducible by DNA damage. Primer extension analysis of recA mRNA located the recA gene transcriptional start. A sequential deletion of the fusion plasmid was used to delimit the promoter region of the recA gene. A gel mobility shift assay demonstrated that a DNA-protein complex is formed at this promoter region. This DNA-protein complex was not formed when protein extracts from cells treated with DNA-damaging agents were used, indicating that the binding protein is a repressor. Comparison of the minimal R. palustris no.
    [Show full text]
  • Jiao Da Biochemistry-2
    DNA Damage and Repair Guo-Min Li (李国民 ), Ph.D. Professor James Gardner Chair in Cancer Research University of Kentucky College of Medicine DNA Damage and Repair Contents • DNA damage • DNA damage response • DNA repair – Direct reversal – Base excision repair – Nucleotide excision repair – Translesion synthesis – Mismatch repair – Double strand break repair • Recombination repair • Non-homologous end joining – Inter strand cross-link repair Major DNA Lesions DNA lesions and structures that elicit DNA response reactions. Some of the base backbone lesions and noncanonical DNA structures that elicit DNA response reactions are shown. O6MeGua indicates O6- methyldeoxyguanosine, T<>T indicates a cyclobutane thymine dimer, and the cross-link shown is cisplatin G-G interstrand cross-link. Endogenous DNA Damage Deamination of cytosine to uracil can spontaneously occurs to creates a U·G mismatch. Depurination removes a base from DNA, blocking replication and transcription. Mismatch Derived from Normal DNA Metabolism 5’ 3’ DNA replication errors DNA recombination DNA Damage and Repair Contents • DNA damage • DNA damage response • DNA repair – Direct reversal – Base excision repair – Nucleotide excision repair – Translesion synthesis – Mismatch repair – Double strand break repair • Recombination repair • Non-homologous end joining – Inter strand cross-link repair Cellular Response to DNA Damage A contemporary view of the general outline of the DNA damage response signal-transduction pathway. Arrowheads represent activating events and perpendicular ends represent inhibitory events. Cell- cycle arrest is depicted with a stop sign, apoptosis with a tombstone. The DNA helix with an arrow represents damage-induced transcription, while the DNA helix with several oval-shaped subunits represents damage-induced repair. For the purpose of simplicity, the network of interacting pathways are depicted as a linear pathway consisting of signals, sensors, transducers and effectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Viewed Manually
    Cambray et al. Mobile DNA 2011, 2:6 http://www.mobilednajournal.com/content/2/1/6 RESEARCH Open Access Prevalence of SOS-mediated control of integron integrase expression as an adaptive trait of chromosomal and mobile integrons Guillaume Cambray1†, Neus Sanchez-Alberola2,3†, Susana Campoy2, Émilie Guerin4, Sandra Da Re4, Bruno González-Zorn5, Marie-Cécile Ploy4, Jordi Barbé3, Didier Mazel1* and Ivan Erill3* Abstract Background: Integrons are found in hundreds of environmental bacterial species, but are mainly known as the agents responsible for the capture and spread of antibiotic-resistance determinants between Gram-negative pathogens. The SOS response is a regulatory network under control of the repressor protein LexA targeted at addressing DNA damage, thus promoting genetic variation in times of stress. We recently reported a direct link between the SOS response and the expression of integron integrases in Vibrio cholerae and a plasmid-borne class 1 mobile integron. SOS regulation enhances cassette swapping and capture in stressful conditions, while freezing the integron in steady environments. We conducted a systematic study of available integron integrase promoter sequences to analyze the extent of this relationship across the Bacteria domain. Results: Our results showed that LexA controls the expression of a large fraction of integron integrases by binding to Escherichia coli-like LexA binding sites. In addition, the results provide experimental validation of LexA control of the integrase gene for another Vibrio chromosomal integron and for a multiresistance plasmid harboring two integrons. There was a significant correlation between lack of LexA control and predicted inactivation of integrase genes, even though experimental evidence also indicates that LexA regulation may be lost to enhance expression of integron cassettes.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxidative Stress Resistance in Deinococcus Radiodurans†
    Downloaded from MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS, Mar. 2011, p. 133–191 Vol. 75, No. 1 1092-2172/11/$12.00 doi:10.1128/MMBR.00015-10 Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Oxidative Stress Resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans† 1 1,2 Dea Slade * and Miroslav Radman http://mmbr.asm.org/ Universite´de Paris-Descartes, Faculte´deMe´decine, INSERM U1001, 156 Rue de Vaugirard, 75015 Paris, France,1 and Mediterranean Institute for Life Sciences, Mestrovicevo Setaliste bb, 21000 Split, Croatia2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................134 GENERAL PROPERTIES OF DEINOCOCCUS RADIODURANS.......................................................................134 Common Features of a “Strange” Bacterium.....................................................................................................134 Ecology of D. radiodurans.......................................................................................................................................135 D. radiodurans Physical Structure and Cell Division ........................................................................................135 Metabolic Configuration of D. radiodurans .........................................................................................................136 on March 25, 2015 by UNIVERSIDADE EST.PAULISTA JÚLIO DE Phylogeny of D. radiodurans ..................................................................................................................................140
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of the Spontaneous SOS Response in Corynebacterium Glutamicum and Its Effect on the Lysogenic Prophage CGP3
    Characterization of the spontaneous SOS response in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its effect on the lysogenic prophage CGP3 Inaugural dissertation for the attainment of the title of doctor in the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf presented by Arun Nanda born in Düsseldorf Düsseldorf, December 2015 The thesis in hand has been performed at the Institute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich, from February 2011 until April 2014 under the supervision of Juniorprof. Dr. Julia Frunzke. Published with permission of the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf Supervisor: Juniorprof. Dr. Julia Frunzke Institute of Bio- and Geosciences IBG-1: Biotechnology Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Co-supervisor: Prof. Dr. Joachim Ernst Institue of Molecular Mycology Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf Date of oral examination: April 26th, 2016 Results described in this dissertation have been published in the following original publications: Nanda, A. M., Heyer, A., Krämer, C., Grünberger, A., Kohlheyer, D., & Frunzke, J. (2014). Analysis of SOS-Induced Spontaneous Prophage Induction in Corynebacterium glutamicum at the Single-Cell Level. Journal of Bacteriology, 196(1): 180–8. doi:10.1128/JB.01018-13 Nanda, A. M., Thormann, K., Frunzke, J. (2014) Impact of spontaneous prophage induction on the fitness of bacterial populations and host-microbe interactions. J Bacteriol 197(3): 410-9. doi: 10.1128/JB.02230-14 Arun M. Nanda and Julia Frunzke (2015). The Role of the SOS Response in CGP3 Induction of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Awaiting submission Results of further projects not discussed in this thesis have been published in: Grünberger, A., Probst, C., Helfrich, S., Nanda, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissecting the Reca-(In)Dependent Response to Mitomycin C in Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Using Transcriptional Profiling and Proteomics Analyses
    cells Article Dissecting the RecA-(In)dependent Response to Mitomycin C in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Using Transcriptional Profiling and Proteomics Analyses Anna Brzostek 1,*,† , Przemysław Płoci ´nski 1,2,† , Alina Minias 1 , Aneta Ciszewska 1, Filip G ˛asior 1 , Jakub Pawełczyk 1 , Bozena˙ Dziadek 3, Marcin Słomka 4 and Jarosław Dziadek 1,* 1 Institute of Medical Biology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Lodowa 106, 93-232 Łód´z,Poland; [email protected] (P.P.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (A.C.); fi[email protected] (F.G.); [email protected] (J.P.) 2 Department of Immunology and Infectious Biology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łód´z,Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łód´z,Poland 3 Department of Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łód´z, Banacha 12/16, 90-237 Łód´z,Poland; [email protected] 4 Biobank Lab, Department of Molecular Biophysics, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łód´z,Pomorska 139, 90-235 Łód´z,Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (J.D.) † These authors equally contributed to this work. Abstract: Mycobacteria exploit at least two independent global systems in response to DNA damage: the LexA/RecA-dependent SOS response and the PafBC-regulated pathway. Intracellular pathogens, Citation: Brzostek, A.; Płoci´nski,P.; such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, are exposed to oxidative and nitrosative stress during the course of Minias, A.; Ciszewska, A.; G ˛asior, F.; infection while residing inside host macrophages.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Base Excision Repair: Mutation Induction and Novel Functions
    DNA Base Excision Repair: Mutation Induction and Novel Functions by Izaskun Muruzábal-Lecumberri Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR (PhD) Faculty of Science and Technology Department for Mathematics and Natural Sciences Centre for Organelle Research (CORE) 2015 University of Stavanger N-4036 Stavanger NORWAY www.uis.no © 2015 Izaskun Muruzábal-Lecumberri ISBN: 978-82-7644-608-1 ISSN: 1890-1387 PhD thesis no. 258 Abstract DNA is susceptible to chemical modifications corrupting its cellular information processing function, necessitating correction of such modifications. Cells are formed mostly by water – giving rise to hydrolytic reactions – and aerobic metabolism is a source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) – causing oxidation. Deamination of cytosine to uracil is an example of the former and oxidation of thymine to 5-formyluracil (f5U) is an example of the latter. In order to avoid the incorporation of wrong nucleosides into DNA, f5U must be eliminated and substituted by the correct base. The main mechanism for the repair of f5U is the base excision repair (BER) pathway, in which specific glycosylases recognize the damage and excise it from its ribose residue. Several glycosylases have been found to be involved in the repair of f5U in Escherichia coli, where 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase II (AlkA) may be the most important. However, here we present evidence to indicate that the nucleotide excision repair protein UvrA is also involved in the repair of f5U, although the mechanism has yet to be elucidated. Interestingly, we have found that the AlkA glycosylase, in addition to alleviating is also able to promote mutation induction by 5-formyldeoxyuridine in E.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SOS RESPONSE: Recent Insights Into Umudc-Dependent Mutagenesis and DNA Damage Tolerance
    P1: FQP September 29, 2000 12:36 Annual Reviews AR116-17 Annu. Rev. Genet. 2000. 34:479–97 Copyright c 2000 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved THE SOS RESPONSE: Recent Insights into umuDC-Dependent Mutagenesis and DNA Damage Tolerance Mark D Sutton, Bradley T Smith, Veronica G Godoy, and Graham C Walker Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; e-mail: [email protected] ■ Abstract Be they prokaryotic or eukaryotic, organisms are exposed to a multitude of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damaging agents ranging from ultraviolet (UV) light to fungal metabolites, like Aflatoxin B1. Furthermore, DNA damaging agents, such as reactive oxygen species, can be produced by cells themselves as metabolic byproducts and intermediates. Together, these agents pose a constant threat to an organism’s genome. As a result, organisms have evolved a number of vitally important mechanisms to repair DNA damage in a high fidelity manner. They have also evolved systems (cell cycle checkpoints) that delay the resumption of the cell cycle after DNA damage to allow more time for these accurate processes to occur. If a cell cannot repair DNA damage accurately, a mutagenic event may occur. Most bacteria, including Escherichia coli, have evolved a coordinated response to these challenges to the integrity of their genomes. In E. coli, this inducible system is termed the SOS response, and it controls both accurate and potentially mutagenic DNA repair functions [reviewed comprehensively in (25) and also in (78, 94)]. Re- cent advances have focused attention on the umuD+C+-dependent, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) process that is responsible for SOS mutagenesis (70, 86).
    [Show full text]
  • Mutation Repair Prin
    Peter Pristas BNK1 Mutations and DNA repair Peter Pristas BNK1 2003 The Central Dogma of Molecular Biology The DNA molecule is a single biopolymer in the cell which is repaired All other uncorrectly synthetised biopolymers (RNA, proteins) are degraded There are some 100 enzymes participating in the DNA repair in human cell Peter Pristas BNK1 2003 Mutation n Change in the nucleotide sequence of the genome. Sequence changes are localized, i.e., change from an A to G, deletion of a base pair, addition of three base pairs, etc. n By altering the DNA sequence, a modification of the instructions for a gene product may result, thus affecting the function of that gene. n Occurrence through spontaneous means, without a known cause; or may be induced, use of chemical or physical agents that alter DNA sequences. n May be reversible with a back mutation to the original form. Peter Pristas BNK1 2003 Segregationof heteroduplex DNA during replication Mutations usually become apparent only after cell division yielding one wildtypeand one mutant cell. Peter Pristas BNK1 2003 Type of mutations A. point mutations n transitions n transversions A pyrimidine is changed to another A pyrimidine is changed to a purine, pyrimidine, or a purine to another or a purine to a pyrimidine. purine. Peter Pristas BNK1 2003 Type of mutations B. structural mutations n 1.1. deletionsdeletions == lossloss ofof sequencesequence n 2.2. inversionsinversions == reversalreversal ofof orientationorientation n 3.3. translocattranslocatiionsons == displacementdisplacement n 4.4. duplidupliccationsations
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment and Maintenance of 35S Rrna Gene Chromatin States in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae
    Establishment and maintenance of 35S rRNA gene chromatin states in Saccharomyces cerevisiae DISSERTATION ZUR ERLANGUNG DES DOKTORGRADES DER NATURWISSENSCHAFTEN (DR. RER. NAT.) DER FAKULTÄT FÜR BIOLOGIE UND VORKLINISCHE MEDIZIN DER UNIVERSITÄT REGENSBURG vorgelegt von Manuel Wittner aus Ingolstadt im Februar 2012 Das Promotionsgesuch wurde eingereicht am: 07. Februar 2012 Die Arbeit wurde angeleitet von: PD Dr. Joachim Griesenbeck Prüfungsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Herbert Tschochner 1. Prüfer: PD Dr. Joachim Griesenbeck 2. Prüfer: Prof. Dr. Michael Rehli 3. Prüfer: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Seufert Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde in der Zeit von Dezember 2008 bis Februar 2012 am Lehrstuhl Biochemie III des Institutes für Biochemie, Genetik und Mikrobiologie der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät III der Universität Regensburg unter Anleitung von PD Dr. Joachim Griesenbeck im Labor von Prof. Dr. Herbert Tschochner angefertigt. Ich erkläre hiermit, dass ich diese Arbeit selbst verfasst und keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel verwendet habe. Diese Arbeit war bisher noch nicht Bestandteil eines Prüfungsverfahrens. Andere Promotionsversuche wurden nicht unternommen. Manuel Wittner Regensburg, 07. Februar 2012 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Summary...................................................................................................................1 2 Introduction ..............................................................................................................3 2.1 Eukaryotic chromatin structure..............................................................................3
    [Show full text]