The Adventure to Find Our Beginnings!

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Adventure to Find Our Beginnings! HODDER & ASSOCIATED FAMILIES – DORSET & DEVON – PART 1 INDEX 1 Hodder & Associated Families - Dorset & Devon – Part 1 - by The Rev’d. Katherine Hammer, BTheol., BSocSci. H&AF-D&D-P1-R1-14032020 3 Hodder & Associated Families - Dorset & Devon – Part 1 - by The Rev’d. Katherine Hammer, BTheol., BSocSci. H&AF-D&D-P1-R1-14032020 4 Hodder & Associated Families - Dorset & Devon – Part 1 - by The Rev’d. Katherine Hammer, BTheol., BSocSci. H&AF-D&D-P1-R1-14032020 5 Hodder & Associated Families - Dorset & Devon – Part 1 - by The Rev’d. Katherine Hammer, BTheol., BSocSci. H&AF-D&D-P1-R1-14032020 DAY SIX of 55 days – Tuesday 23 May 2017 CH. 1 - SALISBURY – AND A HODDER BRIDE! Well, we are off! The adventure has begun! We left Reading about 9.10am and after some to-ing and fro-ing around various motorways headed towards Salisbury, in the County of Wiltshire but not after a stop in a beautiful village called Stockport, but I think that all villages are beautiful, everywhere you look there are beautiful and quaint little houses and exquisite picture book villages. Stockport was the first quaint village out of just so many that we discovered. But it was only a preview of the most exquisite places we were to see on our journey. SALISBURY. Salisbury! Salisbury Cathedral is truly magnificent. The story of Salisbury Cathedral actually originates in Old Sarum several miles away, where shortly after the Conquest, the Norman conquerors built a castle within the protective earthen banks of an Iron Age enclosure. For those who watch Time Team, you’ll know exactly what I mean! In 1075, a Cathedral was built close to the Castle but sadly the monks and the castle garrison did not get on! So, in 1220 the Bishop of Salisbury decided to build another Cathedral away from the sphere of the Castle’s influence. So, the story goes that the Bishop of Salisbury stood on the castle mound and shot an arrow into the air and determined that where it landed would be where he would build his new cathedral. The general opinion is that he must have been a wonderful archer as the new site was several miles from the castle mound ( Salisbury Cathedral top right i). The existing building was completed in 1258 and has remained virtually intact. Upon entering the Cathedral, one’s eyes are immediately drawn to these awe- inspiring arches and vaulted ceilings. The ceilings are spectacular, with superb arches, they made me feel breathless with their soaring magnificence, one can understand the symbolism behind them that they are meant to represent the arches of heaven (picture above rightii). 6 Hodder & Associated Families - Dorset & Devon – Part 1 - by The Rev’d. Katherine Hammer, BTheol., BSocSci. H&AF-D&D-P1-R1-14032020 However, one has barely time to recover their breath before their eyes are drawn to this amazing Baptismal Font. The water looks just like a mirror and at each side of the vault of water was a favourite quotation of mine from Isaiah, “I have called you by name, you are mine, when you pass through the waters I will be with you, and through the rivers they shall not overwhelm you, do not fear for I have redeemed you.” (photos prev page). Designed by William Pye and consecrated in 2008, water continually moves through the font, overflowing at each corner. For the ancient Jews, the divine was found in moving water, not in stilliii. William Pye’s website describes it thus, “Water is the predominant feature of this work, its surface reflecting and extending the surrounding architecture, while four smooth filaments of water pass through spouts at each of the four corners of a bronze vessel and disappear through a bronze grating set into the floor.” YouTube has videos of it in action, plus there is a video on William Pye’s websiteiv. It is exquisite! In 1613, we find evidence of Hodders here at Salisbury Cathedral. In 1613, King James I had been on the throne, since 1603. He was the first Stuart (Scottish) King of England. He believed in the ‘divine right of kings’, whereby kings only answer to God & he refused to share his power with Parliament. This undermined the strong government put in WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A MARRIED WOMAN in the place by Queen Elizabeth I. James also 1600’s. Most men from that age would shake their heads in angered the people by raising taxes & disbelief at the idea of equality of the sexes. Men are born to attempting to marry his son, Charles to the different states, some rich, some poor, some the elder brother, daughter of the Catholic King of Spain & some the younger brother and they are not treated equal, so Spain was the super power of that era. Less why should women be treated as equal to a man. God created women inequal to men in strength and size and a London than a hundred years before, in 1517 the physician makes a list of 70 diseases that women get, which Protestant Reformation challenged the indicates the punishment of Eve upon them. Up until she is Catholic faith. In 1605, a group of Catholics married a woman is the property of her father, and once she in the Gunpowder Plot attempted to blow up is married, she becomes the property of her husband. The the king, as they wanted a Catholic husband is the head of the household and is the ultimate authority and any females, whether wife or daughters monarch, yet on the other side of the automatically fall under his authority. All property is owned by spectrum in 1620, 100 Puritans set sail on him, so a wife’s possessions are legally her husband’s the ship the ‘Mayflower’ to America, property, not her own. If a woman owns or inherits freehold because they were unhappy with the property in her own right, then the right to enjoy the income religious laws in Englandv. And it was on from it automatically transfers to her husband; he can keep taking the income even after her death (as long as she has the 30 January, 1613 with these events as a given him children). If a married woman wishes to dispose of background that we meet Susan Hodder. anything she owns, she has to ask her husband’s permission. While not a direct ancestor, Susan A married woman is not allowed to enter a legal contract could possibly be a distant relative. Later without her husband’s consent. She cannot do or say anything evidence appears to show that she was the contrary to her husband’s interests. She cannot even draw up a last will and testament without her husband’s permission. daughter of a high-status Yeoman, for what She is not allowed to let anyone from outside the family into the she could expect as a woman – read right! home without his permission. She can be chastised or beaten with impunity by her husband as long as he does not actually kill her. It is said that a man may legally beat an outlaw, a traitor, a pagan, his villein (serf) and his wife – and that list suggests the low status that a married woman occupies in the eyes of the law. And many men do beat their wives, whether because of a violent nature, a disagreement or an act of disobedience. However, unless someone, ie a father is prepared to look after a woman indefinitely, the alternative to marriage might be poverty and starvation. 7 Hodder & Associated Families - Dorset & Devon – Part 1 - by The Rev’d. Katherine Hammer, BTheol., BSocSci. H&AF-D&D-P1-R1-14032020 Susan Hodder married Thomas Goodale of Wiltshire here in Salisbury Cathedral, under these soaring arches. What an amazing experience for her, how did she feel as she gazed up into those magnificent, incredible arched vaults? Overwhelmed? That she was doing the will of God? Or did she only have eyes for her husband? And her future? Would he beat her? Was it a loving marriage or one made by the families for convenience? The latter, I suspect! We have just read, what it meant in 1613 for Susan Hodder to be a married woman? Insert prev. page. vi Sadly, in legal terms it is only in the last fifty years, that life has changed for women. What was Susan Hodder’s relationship to us? I don’t know! Though subsequent research indicates that Hodders were living in the Counties of Devon, Dorset, Somerset and Wiltshire in those times, so a familial relationship to Susan is probable, but certainly swallowed up in the mists of time. A brief look at the Goodale family has some later marriages within the Yeoman class (See belowvii), so it is probably representative of their status to be married in Salisbury Cathedral. Yeomen married within their class and as we will see though their circumstances fluctuate sometimes quite drastically, across the social spectrum, the Hodders, Whitemores, Parkin and Gribbles mainly come from this Yeoman Class, though records show in the 16th century, some Hodders were seen as Gentleman, which is a level of the Gentry. WHAT IS A YEOMAN! From the 15th to 18th centuries, a yeoman is described as "a commoner who cultivates his own land". Yeomen farmers owned land (freehold, leasehold or copyhold) and their wealth and the size of their landholding varied. …He is sometimes described as a small landowner, a farmer of the middle classes" … "A Yeoman would not normally have less than 100 acres" (40 hectares) "and in social status is one step down from the Landed gentry, but above - a husbandman".
Recommended publications
  • 1 BATTLE and WILLIAM COBBETT This Article Explores
    BATTLE AND WILLIAM COBBETT This article explores William Cobbett’s relationship with Battle, which he visited in 1822 and, famously, on 16 October 1830. We look at this under the following headings: Who was Cobbett? Cobbett’s first visit to Battle, 1822, his address in the George Hotel The meeting of 16 October 1830 and why it was nationally significant The Battle Declaration: who signed, and what the document tells us How the Government sought to “frame” Cobbett: Arising from his meeting at Battle, Cobbett’s trial at the Guildhall 7 July 1831 Sources and further reading An account of some of the personalities who emerged during the crisis of 1830-31- Charles Inskipp, John Pearson, James Gutsell, George Maule The political background of the “Captain Swing” riots What influence did the meeting have – how close was E Sussex to insurrection? Who was Cobbett? William Cobbett (1763 -1835) straddled the late eighteenth century and the early nineteenth, in lifespan as well as in attitudes. He was a farmer who believed in an old order of the countryside based on respect for all its parties: decently paid labourers helping reasonable landowners to produce food which should be available at affordable prices, while small government would reduce taxes and keep farmers comfortable. Cobbett saw reform of Parliament as the means by which politicians would be put back in touch with the real problems of the country and its poor. But he defies modern political categories: he opposed abolition of slavery as hypocritical and was arguably anti-semitic in his views on what he saw as usury.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Copy 2020 02 17 Baker
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Baker, Leonard Title: Spaces, Places, Custom and Protest in Rural Somerset and Dorset, c. 1780-1867. General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. Spaces, Places, Custom and Protest in Rural Somerset and Dorset, c. 1780-1867 Leonard John Baker A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in accordance with the requirements for award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Arts School of Humanities September 2019 Word Count: 79,998 Abstract This thesis examines how material space, meaningful place and custom shaped the forms and functions of protest in rural Somerset and Dorset between 1780 and 1867.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the NAVY in the ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Submitted by Michael James
    1 THE NAVY IN THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Submitted by Michael James Lea-O’Mahoney, to the University of Exeter, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in September 2011. This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. 2 ABSTRACT This thesis is concerned chiefly with the military role of sea power during the English Civil War. Parliament’s seizure of the Royal Navy in 1642 is examined in detail, with a discussion of the factors which led to the King’s loss of the fleet and the consequences thereafter. It is concluded that Charles I was outmanoeuvred politically, whilst Parliament’s choice to command the fleet, the Earl of Warwick, far surpassed him in popularity with the common seamen. The thesis then considers the advantages which control of the Navy provided for Parliament throughout the war, determining that the fleet’s protection of London, its ability to supply besieged outposts and its logistical support to Parliamentarian land forces was instrumental in preventing a Royalist victory. Furthermore, it is concluded that Warwick’s astute leadership went some way towards offsetting Parliament’s sporadic neglect of the Navy. The thesis demonstrates, however, that Parliament failed to establish the unchallenged command of the seas around the British Isles.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Katrina Navickas What Happened to Class? New Histories of Labour and Collective Action in Britain. Recently, My Family Called
    1 Katrina Navickas What Happened to Class? New Histories of Labour and Collective Action in Britain. Recently, my family called me a „labour historian‟. A „labour historian‟ is one of the last epithets I would give to my thoroughly bourgeois self, so I considered why they made that association. In 2005, I published an article rethinking Luddism, the machine– breaking outbreaks of 1812. It stuck out somewhat incongruously as an old–fashioned topic, although I had reworked it with a postmodernist nod towards the agency of language.1 In the heyday of labour history in the 1960s and 1970s, it was a natural assumption to connect the study of trade unions and the Labour party with labour‟s more troublesome sister, social movements and popular protest. Yet over the past couple of decades, labour history has changed. Many of its historians no longer regard the labour (and Labour) movement as the be–all and end–all of the history of the working class. Their interests have diversified, shedding new light on identities and activities that are not completely subsumed by a narrative of class. Perhaps, indeed, I had mistaken myself for a labour historian of the old sort, even though methodologically and culturally I was far from being so. Although I did not realise it at the time, however, protest history had begun to be rethought and revived in a new direction. This is a review of recent developments in British labour and collective action history. In 2009, I returned to mythical leaders of machine–breakers. This time they were in the form of „Captain Swing‟, that head of the eponymous rural agitation of the early 1830s.
    [Show full text]
  • The Poor in England Steven King Is Reader in History at Contribution to the Historiography of Poverty, Combining As It Oxford Brookes University
    king&t jkt 6/2/03 2:57 PM Page 1 Alannah Tomkins is Lecturer in History at ‘Each chapter is fluently written and deeply immersed in the University of Keele. primary sources. The work as a whole makes an original The poor in England Steven King is Reader in History at contribution to the historiography of poverty, combining as it Oxford Brookes University. does a high degree of scholarship with intellectual innovation.’ The poor Professor Anne Borsay, University of Wales, Swansea This fascinating collection of studies investigates English poverty in England between 1700 and 1850 and the ways in which the poor made ends meet. The phrase ‘economy of makeshifts’ has often been used to summarise the patchy, disparate and sometimes failing 1700–1850 strategies of the poor for material survival. Incomes or benefits derived through the ‘economy’ ranged from wages supported by under-employment via petty crime through to charity; however, An economy of makeshifts until now, discussions of this array of makeshifts usually fall short of answering vital questions about how and when the poor secured access to them. This book represents the single most significant attempt in print to supply the English ‘economy of makeshifts’ with a solid, empirical basis and to advance the concept of makeshifts from a vague but convenient label to a more precise yet inclusive definition. 1700–1850 Individual chapters written by some of the leading, emerging historians of welfare examine how advantages gained from access to common land, mobilisation of kinship support, crime, and other marginal resources could prop up struggling households.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historiography of Social Movements Å
    Chapter 1 The Historiography of Social Movements å Halfway through the twentieth century, Fernand Braudel raised a call for establishing a productive dialogue between history and the social sciences whereby history might freely employ indispensable concepts that it was incapable of developing by itself, and the social sciences might acquire the temporal depth they lacked. He went on to state that there would be no social science ‘other than by the reconciliation in a simultaneous practice of our different crafts’. The convergence of history with the social sciences was baptized ‘social history’ and later, in the United States, as ‘historical sociology’ to underline sociologists’ shift towards historiography.1 At the fi rst international congress of historical sciences held after the Second World War in Paris, 1950, Eric Hobsbawm was involved in the section on social history, ‘probably the fi rst in any historical congress’, as he recalls in his autobiography.2 It gained momentum in 1952 with the creation of the British journal Past and Present, which brought to- gether a group of Marxist historians (Hobsbawm himself, Christopher Hill, Rodney Hilton, George Rudé, and E.P. Thompson), joined by such prominent scholars as Lawrence Stone, John Elliot and Moses Finley. Meanwhile, in the United States, historical sociology took its fi rst steps forward with Barrington Moore, the Harvard teacher of Charles Tilly. It would be very hard to fi nd a sociologist who has taken better ad- vantage of history than Tilly. With the exception of his fi rst book, on the counter-revolution in the Vendée (published in 1964), long duration, which Braudel conceptualized as the history of structures, is the time- frame for Tilly’s analysis, whether it be of social struggles in France, state systems, European revolutions, democracy or social movements worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revolt of the Fields in East Anglia 4/- 50 (Alf Peacock)
    I N M E M O R I A who has been Secretary of the History Group of the Communist Party for several years, died on Tuesday, 19th April. Without his lively interest and constant practical help OUR HISTORY would not have appeared, nor would the other activities of the History Group have taken place. He was typical of the best in the British working-class, a lifelong Communist, educated by the Communist Party and by his own wide experiences and self-study. In recent years he had been responsible for many developments in the educational and cultural work of the Party. His vast knowledge of people and his deep humanism, was always at the service of professional and specialist groups. His modesty was an example to all who worked with him; it cloaked but did not conceal from the perceptive a penetrating mind and considerable learning. We shall miss him greatly,: His monument is in the developing influence of Marxist ideas in many varied aspects of our culture. Page One FOREWORD Mr. Peacock's "Bread or Blood" (Gollancz, 1965) did not receive the attention which it deserved. We suspect because its combination of massive documentation in the local press and local records with unwavering sympathy for the cause of the exploited and oppressed made the academic and reviewing establishment uneasy. Mr. Peacock has now turned his attention from the 'agrarian riots in East Anglia in 1816' to 'the agricultural trade unionism of the 1870s' in the same area. (l) We are pleased to be able to publish this study, although Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Enclosure in England
    Parliamentary Enclosure in England An Introduction to its Causes, Incidence and Impact 1750-1850 G.E. MINGAY ~ Longman London and New York 6 Parliamentary Enclosure in England some of the new fields were called after the recently lost open fields and commons, or by more precise if mundane descriptions such as Twenty Acres or Fourteen Acres. The new crops introduced in the CHAPTER TWO period were also commemorated by names such as Trefoil Close, Turnip Close, Potato Ground.7 So enclosure has left its marks, which are still evident some two centuries or more after the event. A present-day historian was once The Anatomy of Enclosure heard to remark that, as a subject for fresh discussion, enclosure was dead and buried. Nothing could be further from the truth. It continues to fascinate a younger generation of historians, as evid­ enced by the frequent appearance of important new research in books and articles. It is a subject, in fact, which has always aroused controversy and seems likely to continue to do so in the future. But too often, in the view of the present writer, the controversies are The meaning of enclosure obscured by an unfortunate lack of balance and a failure to recog­ nise the facts of the matter. If this book goes some way towards What exactly was enclosure? What did it involve? Most simply, it creating a more realistic basis for discussion, then the many years meant the extinction of common rights which people held over the spent in bringing its material together will have been well used.
    [Show full text]
  • Captain Swing: a Retrospect Randall, Adrian
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Portal Captain Swing: A Retrospect Randall, Adrian DOI: 10.1017/S0020859009990393 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (Harvard): Randall, A 2009, 'Captain Swing: A Retrospect', International Review of Social History, vol. 54, no. 03, pp. 419- 427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859009990393 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: © Cambridge University Press 2009 Eligibility for repository: checked July 2014 General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrarian Reform and Agricultural Improvement in Lowland Scotland, 1750-1850
    AGRARIAN REFORM AND AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT IN LOWLAND SCOTLAND, 1750-1850 A Thesis by JOSHUA DAVID CLARK HADDIX Submitted to the Graduate School at Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2013 Department of History AGRARIAN REFORM AND AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT IN LOWLAND SCOTLAND, 1750-1850 A Thesis by JOSHUA DAVID CLARK HADDIX May 2013 APPROVED BY: Michael Turner Chairperson, Thesis Committee Jari Eloranta Member, Thesis Committee Jason White Member, Thesis Committee Lucinda McCray Beier Chairperson, Department of History Edelma D. Huntley Dean, Cratis Williams Graduate School Copyright by Joshua David Clark Haddix 2013 All Rights Reserved Abstract AGRARIAN REFORM AND AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT IN LOWLAND SCOTLAND, 1750-1850 Joshua David Clark Haddix B.A., University of Cincinnati M.A., Appalachian State University Chairperson: Dr. Michael Turner Lowland Scotland underwent massive changes between 1750 and 1850. Agrarian improvement and land enclosure changed the way Scottish farmers and laborers used and thought about the land. This, in turn, had a major impact on industrialization, urbanization, and emigration. Predominantly, those in charge of implementing these wide-reaching changes were middle-class tenant farmers seeking to improve their social status. The power of these estate partitioners, or overseers, increased in the Lowlands throughout the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. They were integral to the improvement process in the Lowlands. They often saw both sides of agrarian reform, documenting it as such. By 1850, Lowland Scotland was one of the most industrialized and enlightened sectors of Europe; a century earlier it had been one of the least.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgotten Farm Workers: Contemporary Farm Labour and Sustainability in the South West of England
    Forgotten Farm Workers: Contemporary Farm Labour and Sustainability in the South West of England Volume 1 of 1 Caroline Nye Centre for Rural Policy Research, University of Exeter 1 Forgotten Farm Workers: Contemporary Farm Labour and Sustainability in the South West of England Volume 1 of 1 Submitted by Caroline Nye to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Politics December 2017 This thesis is available for library use on the understanding that is it copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without prior acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other university. Signature: …………………………………………………………………. Date: …………………………………………………….. 2 Abstract The mass decline in agricultural labour in Britain since the industrial revolution has, ultimately, led to it becoming a significant ‘blind spot’ in the agricultural research agenda. Data regarding those who actively work at the ‘frontline’ of agriculture, and how they interrelate with other agents in their network to achieve multiple national and global agendas, is minimal. This thesis contributes and develops a comprehensive body of knowledge concerning the composition of labour on farms in the South West of England, as well as identifying and exploring contemporary relationships between farm labour contributors, the community; and the land, through the examination of the lived experience of different contributors to agricultural labour. These changes are considered under the lens of agriculture’s ever-encroaching challenges of productivity, labour skills shortages and sustainable intensification.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography Manuscript Sources Aberdeen University Library MS
    Bibliography Manuscript Sources Aberdeen University Library MS 2538 James Fraser travel diary All Souls, Oxford MS 167 Parliamentary and state papers MS 181 Parliamentary and state papers Alnwick Letters and Papers 18 Northumberland Papers, 1657-63 MS 548-52 John Fitzjames letterbooks O.I.2f Hugh Potter letterbook, 1644-6 U.I.6 Northumberland Accounts, 1641-9 Anthony House Carew-Pole papers Buller papers Arundel Castle, Sussex Howard papers Badminton Sir Thomas Roe library list Bedfordshire Record Office St John of Bletso papers Trevor-Wingfield papers Bagshaw collection Orlebar papers Beinecke Library, Yale University, New Haven Osborn papers Boswell papers Edward S. Harkness pamphlet collection Belvoir Castle Tollemache papers Berkshire Record office Lenthall papers Reading borough corporation Berwick Record Office Berwick borough corporation Bethlem Royal Hospital Court Books Birmingham City Archives Knight papers Fetherston correspondence Bodleian Library MS Add.C.132 Parliamentary proceedings MS Bankes Sir John Bankes papers MS Carte Carte papers MS Clarendon Clarendon papers MS Eng.Lett.b.1 Symon Archer papers MS Eng.Lett.c.210 John Palmer correspondence MS Eng.Hist.e.184 Gerbier papers MS Eng.Hist.e.308 Roger Whitley papers MS Eng.Misc.c.338 William Freke accounts MS Eng.Misc.e.6 John Smyth of Nibley accounts MS Eng.Misc.e.118 George Starkey diary MS Eng.Misc.e.479 Henry Townshend papers MS Locke b.2 John Locke papers MS Nalson Lenthall papers MS North.c.4 Lord North papers, 1602-77 MS Rawl.A Thurloe papers MS Rawl.D.141 England’s Memorable Accidents, 1636-44 MS Selden Supra 108 John Selden papers MS Tanner Tanner papers MS Top.Essex.f.1 Personal account book MS Top.Oxon.c.154 Oxford stationers MS Top.Oxon.c.378 Thomas Wyatt of Ducklington diary MS Walker.c.4 Royalist ministers MS Wood 423 Anthony Wood papers Bristol Record Office Bristol borough corporation British Library Add.
    [Show full text]