DOCSLIB.ORG

Smartesting Certifyit V5.1 Datasheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Smartesting Certifyit V5.1 Datasheet Smartesting CertifyIt™ 5.1 Datasheet Automate design for your test repository Traditionally we think of testers as the writers of Smartesting CertifyIt™ test scripts through a long and tedious manual process. Key value points: This manual testing process typically extends from the > Only CertifyIt™ provides automation between formal initial steps when assessing test requirements, to the description of the business needs captured by analysts, final step when successful test verdicts are obtained. and repeatable regression testing assets manipulated For mature test practitioners Application Lifecycle by testers, Management implies robust iterative software delivery > Only CertifyIt™ provides built in integration to existing from design to production delivery. Those testers want tools, methodologies and processes for requirement to be productive and predictable while delivering both management, modeling, and test management, reliable and systematic functional validation. > Only Smartesting extends the Model-based Testing The Smartesting solution automates the test design step and integrates CertifyIt™ with requirement concept to its actual implementation though the CertifyIt™ management, modeling and test management engine that provides ‘executable specifications’ from BPMN solutions. Thanks to the benefits of automated test and UML models, design you can start now to implement a fully > Only Smartesting makes the Test Factory concept real industrialized tool chain based on your current testing with its certification approach that automates the production tools. CertifyIt™ implements built-in integrations with of functional tests based on risks: it helps reduce the costs Micro Focus, HP and IBM solutions and creates of testing the most critical business applications. additional value on top of your current practices. What if the design and related specifications change? Being able to adopt some iterative approach in testing remains a key pain for most projects. When specifications change, the amount of effort required for each new update is often difficult to estimate, which adds risks to projects. Consequently, even if functional testing and test automation are well established practices today, with easy to find guidelines, expert resources and commercial-off-the-shelf products, the expected cost of testing is typically far from being predictable. This challenge illustrates the test practitioner’s needs for reducing risks and drastically improving their current testing practices. 'Adopt Smartesting CertifyItTM engine for test case and test script generation from models' Copyright © SMARTESTING 2011 - All rights reserved. Smartesting CertifyIt™ 5.1 Datasheet Smartesting CertifyItTM 5.1 integrations* Supported Modelers Key features include: ● · IBM Rational Software Modeler v7.0.5.x or v7.5.x ● BPMN and UML Model-driven formal ●· IBM Rational Software Architect v8.0 description and simulation of expected ● Micro Focus Together 2008 for Eclipse behaviors and test objectives Supported Test Management Environments ● Maintains traceability between ●· HP Quality Center v9.0, v9.2, v9.5 or v10.0 requirements, models and generated tests ●· HP QuickTest Professional v9.5, v10.0, v11.0 ● Expedites adoption of iterative testing: ● HP Business Process Testing increases test automation level, shortens test ● IBM Rational Quality Manager v2.0 design cycles when requirements change ●· IBM Rational Functional Tester v8.0 ● Graphical user-driven generation of rd *more details on 3 party test environments supported on request executable test scripts from models to your favorite test management environment Smartesting CertifyItTM 5.1 system requirements ● Supported Operating Systems Produces and maintains tests in natural ●· MS Windows 2000, XP Pro SP2 or SP3, language for manual execution Vista SP1, Business, Enterprise, and Ultimate Edition, Windows 7 32or 64-bits version Smartesting® is a referenced business partner of HP® and IBM® ●· Ubuntu GNU/Linux distribution (Desktop Edition) 32 or 64-bits ●· Java Runtime Environment: version 1.6.0 or higher Minimum RAM: 1GB, 2 GB recommended Disk Space: 200 MB free space required CPU: 1GHz, 2.8 GHz or more recommended contact us at www.smartesting.com Copyright © SMARTESTING 2011 - All rights reserved..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proceedings of the First Twente Data Management Workshop on XML
    O m s l a g T 7 P C S U I T P D S 5 h . e h T n M O S 0 e c o I i 0 v T 2 . N r n 0 N e B e 0 A e 1 r 4 t e o s E a . 5 + p t x i 7 r 6 h 3 t E i 5 y 2 4 e 1 a n 1 - r t o s 0 5 7 l C f a c 8 3 T n 4 T h 4 6 w d I e 8 T s d 9 e : e n 8 t 0 e 3 1 1 173852-os-CTIT.qxd 08-06-2009 14:33 Pagina 1 2 T E E V D 1 h d n o j o e i s j J t k e c o 1 u a N r 1 h r n d / n s 2 e e e 5 : H t M d / 0 h 2 e i 4 e e i 0 , h 8 r m 0 a : l 4 4 a s j 7 l n t o A r d M v a s i c & T P T W w D r I o o n e M c r f n k e o s t e 2 r e h m d 0 o D 0 i a p n a 4 t g i t o o a s n n o M W C X R f T M o a I e t T r h n k t L s r e a h i e D g o f p i v e a r P a s m t r a t l o F e c b e n a e t s d i i e n f g s s t h E u r o p e a n C o n f e r e n c e o n Twente Data Management M o d e l - D r i v e Workshop on XML Databases n ProceedingsProceedings of theof the first first A r c h Fifth European Conference on i t e c TwenteTwente Data Data Management Management t u r & Information Retrieval e Model-Driven Architecture F o u n WorkshopWorkshop on onXML XML Databases Databases d Foundations and Applications: a t i o n s a Proceedings of the Tools and n & Information& Information Retrieval Retrieval d A TDM 2004 p p Consultancy Track l i c a t i o n TDM 2004 s TDM 2004 : CTIT P r o c e Workshop Proceedings e CTITCTITCTIT Workshop Proceedings d i n g WorkshopWorkshop Proceedings Proceedings s o f t h e T o o l s a n d June, 2009 C o n The Netherlands s u l SecrSecretariatetariat CTITCTIT:Secretariat: Secretariat CTIT: CTIT: t a n 21 June21 2004 June 2004 UniversitySecretariat of UniversityTwente CTIT:University of Twente of Twente c y EnschedeEnschede CTIT CTIT CTIT T Editor: University of Twente r 21 June 2004 a The NetherlandsThe Netherlands PP.O..O.
    [Show full text]
  • UML-Tools 2.0 Intern
    Software Systems E ngineering H. Eichelberger, Y. Eldogan, K. Schmid A Comprehensive Analysis of UML Tools, their Capabilities and their Compliance August 2011 Version 2.0 IfI Report Nr. 1/2012 Software Systems Engineering Institut für Informatik Universität Hildesheim Marienburger Platz 22 D-31134 Hildesheim A comprehensive survey of UML tool capabilities and compliance A comprehensive survey of UML tool capabilities and compliance Executive Summary The Unified Modeling Language (UML) has been widely adopted in software engineering prac- tice in industry over the last decade. A large range of different tools have been developed both from industrial providers as well as open source tools. However, due to the complexity of the UML specification it is very difficult for a single tool to support the full range of UML stand- ards faithfully. In practice tools differ significantly in terms of the parts of the UML specifica- tion they support. The decision of a development organization for a specific tool environment is a very significant one, which typically leads to a significant amount of costs (e.g., in terms of training), out of which the licensing costs, though significant, are often only a minor part. Thus, the tool needs to be chosen with very much care. As one aid towards a rational tool selection decision, this report provides the most comprehensive comparison of UML tools currently available. This study provides the most comprehensive assessment of the current tool support. It combines a detailed information collection effort for each individual tool, a broad range of tools analyzed and also analyzed UML compliance as defined by the OMG.
    [Show full text]
  • A Model-Driven Architecture Based Evolution Method and Its Application in an Electronic Learning System
    A Model-Driven Architecture based Evolution Method and Its Application in An Electronic Learning System PhD Thesis Yingchun Tian Software Technology Research Laboratory De Montfort University October, 2012 To my husband, Delin Jing and my mum, Ning Zhang for their love and support Declaration Declaration I declare that the work described in this thesis was originally carried out by me during the period of registration for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at De Montfort University, U.K., from October 2008 to December 2011. It is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at De Montfort University. Apart from the degree that this thesis is currently applying for, no other academic degree or award was applied for by me based on this work. I Acknowledgements Acknowledgements For many years I had been dreaming about receiving a PhD, I would like to thank many people who helped me in achieving this dream in different ways since I undertook the work of this thesis. My deepest gratitude goes to my supervisor, Professor Hongji Yang, for his guidance, support and encouragement throughout my PhD career. He always provided me with many invaluable comments and suggestions for the improvement of the thesis. I am grateful for his leading role fostering my academic, professional and personal growth. Many thanks go to Professor Hussein Zedan and Doctor Wenyan Wu, for examining my PhD thesis and providing many helpful suggestions. My research career will benefit tremendously from the research methodologies to which Professor Zedan and Doctor Wu introduced me. I would like to thank colleagues in Software Technology Research Laboratory at De Montfort University, for their support and feedback, and for providing such a stimulating working atmosphere, Professor Hussein Zedan, Doctor Feng Chen, Doctor Amelia Platt, Doctor Antonio Cau, and many other colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Appropriation of a Software Ecosystem
    The Appropriation of a Software Ecosystem A Practice Take on the Usage, Maintenance and Modification of the Eclipse IDE Sebastian Draxler Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor rerum politicarum (Dr. rer. pol.) an der Fakultät III: Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsrecht der Universität Siegen Jahr der Fertigstellung: 2014 Erster Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Gunnar Stevens Zweiter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Volker Wulf Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 23. Oktober 2014 Abstract III Abstract This thesis was written in order to gain a deeper understanding of the appropriation of software in groups and organizations. In doing so, it focuses on software created un- der the modern software engineering trend software ecosystems. Software ecosystems have a major inuence on software development, as they rely on massive usage of dis- tributed software development, open source models and modularization. It is unclear if existing models to explain appropriation still hold good. Furthermore, it has to be ex- plored whether current appropriation support is still appropriate and benecial or if we need new ideas to help users cope with these developments. In order to achieve these objectives, this work is mainly based on an empirical eld study, which investigates workgroups at seven German organizations that use the Eclipse IDE, an extremely modularized and adaptable software system, developed by a globally active ecosystem of large corporations, small businesses and even hobbyists. Using the qualitative analysis approach of the grounded theory method and appropri- ation as a lens for this research endeavor, observations and interviews as well as arti- facts were analyzed, uncovering practices that are part of Eclipse usage and appropria- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Soa of Applications, Type of Users, Business Models, and UCD D1.1
    Do-it-Yourself Smart Experiences ITEA 2 project 08005 SoA of applications, type of users, business models, and UCD D1.1 Editor: E. Marilly, Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs France Reviewers: Zhenzhen. Zhao, Institut Telecom Sudparis, France J. Pierson, VUB-SMIT, Belgium Contributors: E. Marilly, A. Outtagarts, Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs France J. F.. Rodelgo, M. A. Sanguino J. Lucea, F. J. Nieto, Atos Origin D. De Roeck, C. van Nimwegen, CUO-KUL N. Joncheere, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Software Languages Lab W.Van den Broeck, Karen Torben-Nielsen, Jo Pierson, An Jacobs, VUB-SMIT M. Roelands, L. Trappeniers, J. Criel, M. Geerts, Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs BE J. Alonso, ESI-Tecnalia Spain J. Santamaria, , S. Rodriguez, Robotiker-Tecnalia Spain Zhenzhen. Zhao, Noel Crespi, Institut Telecom Sudparis, France J. Kela, Finwe, Finland Juan R. Velasco, Maite Lopez, UAH, Spain Yacine Ghamri-Doudane, Ismail Salhi, ENSIIE, France Jan De Moerloose, GeoSparc Yan Tang, VUB Starlab M. Niemelä, H. Lammi, T. Tuomisto, VTT, Finland Rob Moonen, A.Iyer , Laurea UAS University of OULO G. Miranda Álamo, I&IMS, Spain C. Valderrama, F. Vinci, J. Vachaudez, UMONS, Belgium Security: <Public> Version: <1.0> Date: <April 01, 2010> Number of pages: 131 D1.1 SotA of applications, type of users, business models, and UCD V1.0 History Version Date Person, Partner Comment 0.1 31.07.2009 E. Marilly, AL Bell Labs Fr Creation of the document 0.1.1 18.09.2009 A. Outtagarts, AL Bell Labs FR Modification of the Toc – more details 0.1.2 22.09.2009 J.F. Rodelgo, F.J.
    [Show full text]
  • MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING of COMPONENT-BASED DISTRIBUTED, REAL-TIME and EMBEDDED SYSTEMS by Krishnakumar Balasubramanian Disserta
    MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING OF COMPONENT-BASED DISTRIBUTED, REAL-TIME AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS By Krishnakumar Balasubramanian Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Computer Science December, 2007 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt Dr. Aniruddha Gokhale Dr. Janos Sztipanovits Dr. Gabor Karsai Dr. Jeff Gray To Amma and Appa for their patient support over the years To Vidhya and Sarathy for all the encouragement ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The past seven years have proven to be quite an eventful journey in a variety of ways. I have had the wonderful opportunity to meet and make friends with a number of people and visit a number of interesting places, all of which have left me enriched with the whole experience. First of all, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Douglas C. Schmidt, for providing me with an opportunity to work with him, initially with the Distributed Object Computing (DOC) group at St.Louis and later in Nashville. Doug has been the single biggest source of inspiration in my career as a graduate student, both in good and bad times. Over the years, I have learned a lot from his words of wisdom on a wide variety of topics, both academic and non-academic, and hope that it will continue in the future as well. Next, I would like to thank Dr. Aniruddha S. Gokhale for the various fruitful collaborations over the past four years. It has been a pleasure to work with Andy, who is also a member of my dissertation committee.
    [Show full text]