DOCSLIB.ORG

UML-Tools 2.0 Intern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UML-Tools 2.0 Intern Software Systems E ngineering H. Eichelberger, Y. Eldogan, K. Schmid A Comprehensive Analysis of UML Tools, their Capabilities and their Compliance August 2011 Version 2.0 IfI Report Nr. 1/2012 Software Systems Engineering Institut für Informatik Universität Hildesheim Marienburger Platz 22 D-31134 Hildesheim A comprehensive survey of UML tool capabilities and compliance A comprehensive survey of UML tool capabilities and compliance Executive Summary The Unified Modeling Language (UML) has been widely adopted in software engineering prac- tice in industry over the last decade. A large range of different tools have been developed both from industrial providers as well as open source tools. However, due to the complexity of the UML specification it is very difficult for a single tool to support the full range of UML stand- ards faithfully. In practice tools differ significantly in terms of the parts of the UML specifica- tion they support. The decision of a development organization for a specific tool environment is a very significant one, which typically leads to a significant amount of costs (e.g., in terms of training), out of which the licensing costs, though significant, are often only a minor part. Thus, the tool needs to be chosen with very much care. As one aid towards a rational tool selection decision, this report provides the most comprehensive comparison of UML tools currently available. This study provides the most comprehensive assessment of the current tool support. It combines a detailed information collection effort for each individual tool, a broad range of tools analyzed and also analyzed UML compliance as defined by the OMG. Other tool evaluations often just list the provided types of UML diagrams without discussing the quality of the realization or focus on specific aspects, e.g. the evaluation approach itself or cross-tool compatibility without thoroughly considering the UML specification itself. The focus of this study is on the availability of the defined UML capabilities. This has been evaluated in a very comprehensive and detailed way for all UML tools that we found currently to be available and which are still supported. A detailed breakdown that relates for each identi- fied tool its capabilities to the diagram features defined by the UML enables a fast analysis re- garding the applicability of a tool for a specific development context. This study focuses mainly on the modeling support. Further aspects like usability, model export and interchange and code generation are also addressed, but take a second place in this analysis. In order to support the selection of tools, the UML already introduced the so-called UML com- pliance . This provides different compliance levels that can be used to categorize the UML capa- bilities of a tool according with respect to the standard. As part of our analysis, we also charac- terize the tools in terms of their UML standard compliance as defined by the OMG. As part of this study, we identified approximately 200 tools claiming UML modeling function- ality, out of which 72 were analyzed thoroughly, here as a reevaluation of updated or new tools one year after publishing the first edition in 2009 [12]. The remaining tools were not considered for evaluation due to technical reasons, e.g. the vendor or the tool do not exist anymore, the tool cannot be installed or no maintenance was done for the particular tool since the first version of UML 2 was published. In summary, only the result of 62 tools could be reported, as the licens- ing terms of four tools prohibited publication and we could not achieve (so far) an agreement with the tool providers. As a basis for the evaluation, the UML specification was decomposed into 540 features, each of which was individually evaluated for each of the tools. In this report we only report aggregated values. The full detail was too comprehensive to provide in written form. Thus, the full details per tool can be found at the corresponding web site. Keywords : tool capabilities, feature, UML, UML 2.0, UML compliance, UML modeling tools, tool evaluation, compliance level I A comprehensive survey of UML tool capabilities and compliance Disclaimer The authors have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the survey data and additional information (e.g. price, availability). However, no guarantee of accuracy, completeness or fit- ness for a particular purpose can be given. We do not accept any responsibility or liability in regard of the reliance on, or use of, such data and information. II Index Index Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... I Index III List of Figures ............................................................................................................................ VI List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. IX List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. X 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 Related Work ................................................................................................................... 4 3 Methodology ..................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Collecting Tools for the Evaluation ................................................................................... 7 3.2 Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................................................. 7 3.3 Evaluation Procedure ....................................................................................................... 10 3.4 Data Aggregation ............................................................................................................. 13 3.5 Planning and Conducting the Evaluation ......................................................................... 13 4 UML Compliance ........................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Introduction to UML Compliance ................................................................................... 15 4.2 Object Constraint Language ............................................................................................ 16 4.3 Compliance Level Calculation ......................................................................................... 17 5 Findings per Tool ........................................................................................................... 19 5.1 Example Tool Characterization ....................................................................................... 23 5.2 Apollo by Gentleware ...................................................................................................... 26 5.3 Arcstyler by Interactive Objects ...................................................................................... 28 5.4 ArgoUML by University of California, Irvine ................................................................ 30 5.5 ARIS UML Designer by IDS Scheer ............................................................................... 32 5.6 Artisan Studio by ARTiSAN ........................................................................................... 34 5.7 Artiso VisualCASE by VisualCASE ............................................................................... 36 5.8 Astade by Astade Team at Tigris ..................................................................................... 38 5.9 Blueprint Software Modeler by @-portunity B.V. .......................................................... 40 5.10 BOUML by BOUML Team ............................................................................................ 42 5.11 Cacoo by Nulab Inc. ........................................................................................................ 44 5.12 Cadifra UML Editor by Adrian & Frank Buehlmann ...................................................... 46 5.13 Concept Draw by Computer Systems Odessa ................................................................. 48 5.14 Delphia Object Modeler by Atos Origin .......................................................................... 50 5.15 Dia by Alexander Larsson ............................................................................................... 52 III A comprehensive survey of UML tool capabilities and compliance 5.16 Eclipse UML by Eclipse.org ........................................................................................... 54 5.17 Enterprise Architect by Sparx Systems ........................................................................... 56 5.18 Essential Modeler by Jaczone ......................................................................................... 58 5.19 eUML2 Studio by Soyatec .............................................................................................. 60 5.20 Fujaba by Universities of Paderborn, Kassel, Siegen and Darmstadt ............................. 62 5.21 Gaphor by Gaphor Team at Sourceforge ........................................................................ 64 5.22 Gliffy by Gliffy, Inc. ....................................................................................................... 66 5.23 Green
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Useful Applications – Last Updated 8 Th March 2014
    A List of Useful Applications – Last updated 8 th March 2014 In the descriptions of the software the text in black is my comments. Text in dark blue preceded by 'What they say :-' is a quote from the website providing the software. Rating :- This is my own biased and arbitrary opinion of the quality and usefulness of the software. The rating is out of 5. Unrated = - Poor = Average = Good = Very Good = Essential = Open Office http://www.openoffice.org/ Very Good = Word processor, Spreadsheet, Drawing Package, Presentation Package etc, etc. Free and open source complete office suite, equivalent to Microsoft Office. Since the takeover of this project by Oracle development seems to have ground to a halt with the departure of many of the developers. Libre Office http://www.libreoffice.org/ Essential = Word processor, Spreadsheet, Drawing Package, Presentation Package etc, etc. Free and open source complete office suite, equivalent to Microsoft Office. This package is essentially the same as Open Office however it satisfies the open source purists because it is under the control of an open source group rather than the Oracle Corporation. Since the takeover of the Open Office project by Oracle many of the developers left and a lot of them ended up on the Libre Office project. Development on the Libre Office project is now ahead of Open Office and so Libre Office would be my preferred office suite. AbiWord http://www.abisource.com/ Good = If you don't really need a full office suite but just want a simple word processor then AbiWord might be just what you are looking for.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Based Systems Engineering Approach to Autonomous Driving
    DEGREE PROJECT IN ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2018 Model Based Systems Engineering Approach to Autonomous Driving Application of SysML for trajectory planning of autonomous vehicle SARANGI VEERMANI LEKAMANI KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE Author Sarangi Veeramani Lekamani [email protected] School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Place for Project Sodertalje, Sweden AVL MTC AB Examiner Ingo Sander School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Supervisor George Ungureanu School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science KTH Royal Institute of Technology Industrial Supervisor Hakan Sahin AVL MTC AB Abstract Model Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approach aims at implementing various processes of Systems Engineering (SE) through diagrams that provide different perspectives of the same underlying system. This approach provides a basis that helps develop a complex system in a systematic manner. Thus, this thesis aims at deriving a system model through this approach for the purpose of autonomous driving, specifically focusing on developing the subsystem responsible for generating a feasible trajectory for a miniature vehicle, called AutoCar, to enable it to move towards a goal. The report provides a background on MBSE and System Modeling Language (SysML) which is used for modelling the system. With this background, an MBSE framework for AutoCar is derived and the overall system design is explained. This report further explains the concepts involved in autonomous trajectory planning followed by an introduction to Robot Operating System (ROS) and its application for trajectory planning of the system. The report concludes with a detailed analysis on the benefits of using this approach for developing a system.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Analysis
    visEUalisation Analysis of the Open Source Software. Explaining the pros and cons of each one. visEUalisation HOW TO DEVELOP INNOVATIVE DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL VIDEOS 2018-1-PL01-KA204-050821 1 Content: Introduction..................................................................................................................................3 1. Video scribing software ......................................................................................................... 4 2. Digital image processing...................................................................................................... 23 3. Scalable Vector Graphics Editor .......................................................................................... 28 4. Visual Mapping. ................................................................................................................... 32 5. Configurable tools without the need of knowledge or graphic design skills. ..................... 35 6. Graphic organisers: Groupings of concepts, Descriptive tables, Timelines, Spiders, Venn diagrams. ...................................................................................................................................... 38 7. Creating Effects ................................................................................................................... 43 8. Post-Processing ................................................................................................................... 45 9. Music&Sounds Creator and Editor .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information Technology and Software Development
    Course Title: Information Technology and Software Development NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COURSE CODE: CIT 703 COURSE TITLE: Information Technology and Software Development National Open University of Nigeria, Victoria Island, Lagos Page 1 Course Title: Information Technology and Software Development Course Code Course Title Information Technology and Software Development Course Developer/Writer Eze, Festus Chux Department of Computer Science Ebonyi State University Abakaliki Course Editor Programme Leader Course Coordinator National Open University of Nigeria, Victoria Island, Lagos Page 2 Course Title: Information Technology and Software Development Introduction Information Technology and Software Development is a three credit load course for all the students offering Post Graduate Diploma (PGD) in Computer Science, Information Technology and other allied courses. Software Development is a major branch in computing and information Technology. A software development professional oversees the processes of software development, the management of software development project, the maintenance of the installed software in an organisation. For sometime the field has been dominated with what is the definitive process of software development. Furthermore there has been the running battle between professionals and managers on who should control a software development project. There is an attempt to classify it as any other project that an organisation handles hence anybody could manage it. Whereas others see it as a highly professional issue that requires high precision in design, management and implementation. However, software development is all involving. It involves the user (client) whose interest is paramount. The developing organisation and her professionals ( team)are of great importance. Therefore a successful exercise can only take place when all these variegated interests are harmonised.
    [Show full text]
  • APECS: Polychrony Based End-To-End Embedded System Design and Code Synthesis
    APECS: Polychrony based End-to-End Embedded System Design and Code Synthesis Matthew E. Anderson Dissertation submitted to the faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Engineering Sandeep K. Shukla, Chair Lamine Mili Alireza Haghighat Chao Wang Yi Deng April 3, 2015 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: AADL, CPS, Model-based code synthesis, correct-by-construction code synthesis, Polychrony, code generators, OSATE, Ocarina Copyright 2015, Matthew E. Anderson APECS: Polychrony based End-to-End Embedded System Design and Code Synthesis Matthew E. Anderson (ABSTRACT) The development of high integrity embedded systems remains an arduous and error-prone task, despite the efforts by researchers in inventing tools and techniques for design automa- tion. Much of the problem arises from the fact that the semantics of the modeling languages for the various tools, are often distinct, and the semantics gaps are often filled manually through the engineer's understanding of one model or an abstraction. This provides an op- portunity for bugs to creep in, other than standardising software engineering errors germane to such complex system engineering. Since embedded systems applications such as avionics, automotive, or industrial automation are safety critical, it is very important to invent tools, and methodologies for safe and reliable system design. Much of the tools, and techniques deal with either the design of embedded platforms (hardware, networking, firmware etc), and software stack separately. The problem of the semantic gap between these two, as well as between models of computation used to capture semantics must be solved in order to design safer embedded systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Research Online UML in Practice Oro.Open.Ac.Uk
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs UML in practice Conference Item How to cite: Petre, Marian (2013). UML in practice. In: 35th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2013), 18-26 May 2013, San Francisco, CA, USA (forthcoming), pp. 722–731. For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2013 IEEE Version: Accepted Manuscript Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://2013.icse-conferences.org/ Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copy- right owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk UML in Practice Marian Petre Centre for Research in Computing The Open University Milton Keynes, UK [email protected] Abstract—UML has been described by some as “the lingua UML “with rigor” (as he later expressed to the informant). In franca of software engineering”. Evidence from industry does contrast, the informant concluded that probably 45 of the 47 not necessarily support such endorsements. How exactly is UML were like him: “selective borrowers” … “who use some of the being used in industry – if it is? This paper presents a corpus of principles sometimes”. The IBM speaker and the informant interviews with 50 professional software engineers in 50 had very different models of what ‘using UML’ means in companies and identifies 5 patterns of UML use. practice, with different implications. Index Terms—UML, software development, software design, Budgen et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Tool Use in Software Modelling Education
    Tool use in software modelling education Seiko Akayama1, Birgit Demuth3, Timothy C. Lethbridge4, Marion Scholz2, Perdita Stevens5, and Dave R. Stikkolorum6 1 Kyushu University, Japan 2 Vienna University of Technology, Austria 3 Technische Universit¨atDresden, Germany 4 University of Ottawa Canada 5 University of Edinburgh Scotland 6 Leiden University The Netherlands Abstract. An important decision that must be taken by anyone design- ing a course involving (object oriented software) modelling is what tool support, if any, to use. Options include picking an industrial strength modelling tool, using a tool specifically designed for educational use, or eschewing tool use altogether in favour of pencil and paper. The best an- swer will depend on many factors, including the prior experience of the students (and staff), the length and organisation of the course, and the learning objectives. Moreover, decisions on tools have an impact on other aspects of course design. In this informal paper, the result of discussion at the MODELS Educators' Symposium 2013, we survey previous work on this question, discuss our own experience, and draw out some key issues that someone designing a new course involving modelling must consider. 1 Introduction Teaching object oriented design and modelling in a university is important not only because these are important skills that students will need if they pursue careers in software development, but also because this area is a key interface be- tween research and teaching. This double motivation { we might say, vocational and intellectual { for teaching design and modelling is itself a source of challenge for educators. We experience a tension between the desire to train students in the skills they will need after university, and the desire to have them reflect on the nature of design and modelling and the ways in which these activities could be improved with the help of cutting edge research.
    [Show full text]
  • Sysml Distilled: a Brief Guide to the Systems Modeling Language
    ptg11539604 Praise for SysML Distilled “In keeping with the outstanding tradition of Addison-Wesley’s techni- cal publications, Lenny Delligatti’s SysML Distilled does not disappoint. Lenny has done a masterful job of capturing the spirit of OMG SysML as a practical, standards-based modeling language to help systems engi- neers address growing system complexity. This book is loaded with matter-of-fact insights, starting with basic MBSE concepts to distin- guishing the subtle differences between use cases and scenarios to illu- mination on namespaces and SysML packages, and even speaks to some of the more esoteric SysML semantics such as token flows.” — Jeff Estefan, Principal Engineer, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory “The power of a modeling language, such as SysML, is that it facilitates communication not only within systems engineering but across disci- plines and across the development life cycle. Many languages have the ptg11539604 potential to increase communication, but without an effective guide, they can fall short of that objective. In SysML Distilled, Lenny Delligatti combines just the right amount of technology with a common-sense approach to utilizing SysML toward achieving that communication. Having worked in systems and software engineering across many do- mains for the last 30 years, and having taught computer languages, UML, and SysML to many organizations and within the college setting, I find Lenny’s book an invaluable resource. He presents the concepts clearly and provides useful and pragmatic examples to get you off the ground quickly and enables you to be an effective modeler.” — Thomas W. Fargnoli, Lead Member of the Engineering Staff, Lockheed Martin “This book provides an excellent introduction to SysML.
    [Show full text]
  • VPUML Data Sheet
    Datasheet Visual Paradigm for UML 7.0 Model-Code-Deploy Platform Boost Productivity with Innovative and Intuitive Technologies – From Requirements to Code Datasheet Visual Paradigm for UML 7.0 What VP-UML Provides? UML Modeling Business Process Modeling Visualize, design, communicate and Visualize, understand, analyze and document UML 2.2 diagrams with improve business process with BPMN, intuitive and sophisticated visual Process Map, Data Flow Diagram and modeling environment. Organization Chart. Database Modeling Requirement Modeling Design, generate, reverse and synchronize Capture, organize, manage and realize database with sophisticated ERD. requirements with SysML Requirement Generate professional documentation and Diagram. Build or customize your own Java Object-Relational Mapping layer requirement types. (Hibernate). Mind Mapping Diagramming Toolset Brainstorm, outline, share and discuss Create and maintain business and concepts and idea with mind mapping engineering diagrams with Visual tool. Mind Mapping diagram nodes can Paradigm cutting edge visual modeling link to any BPMN or UML elements to toolset such as resource-centric interface, keep the traceability. mouse gesture, sweeper, magnet, styles and layer. Page 2 of 6 Datasheet Visual Paradigm for UML 7.0 What VP-UML Provides? Modeling Toolset Documentation Generation Beyond diagramming there are various Design and generate professional toolsets to improve the quality of visual documentation in PDF, MS Word 2007 modeling. Nicknamer helps maintain and HTML formats. Keeping database, single element with multiple names for program and technical specification multi-national team. Visual Diff shows up-to-date with minimal effort. differences between diagrams and revisions visually. Animating UML diagram with Animacian. Team Collaboration Interoperability & Integration Modeling collaboratively and Export, import and merge with XML, simultaneously with VP Teamwork XMI, MS Excel formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Petri Net-Based Graphical and Computational Modelling of Biological Systems
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/047043; this version posted June 22, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Petri Net-Based Graphical and Computational Modelling of Biological Systems Alessandra Livigni1, Laura O’Hara1,2, Marta E. Polak3,4, Tim Angus1, Lee B. Smith2 and Tom C. Freeman1+ 1The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Edinburgh, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK. 2MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK, 3Clinical and Experimental Sciences, Sir Henry Wellcome Laboratories, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, SO16 6YD, Southampton, 4Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. Abstract In silico modelling of biological pathways is a major endeavour of systems biology. Here we present a methodology for construction of pathway models from the literature and other sources using a biologist- friendly graphical modelling system. The pathway notation scheme, called mEPN, is based on the principles of the process diagrams and Petri nets, and facilitates both the graphical representation of complex systems as well as dynamic simulation of their activity. The protocol is divided into four sections: 1) assembly of the pathway in the yEd software package using the mEPN scheme, 2) conversion of the pathway into a computable format, 3) pathway visualisation and in silico simulation using the BioLayout Express3D software, 4) optimisation of model parameterisation. This method allows reconstruction of any metabolic, signalling and transcriptional pathway as a means of knowledge management, as well as supporting the systems level modelling of their dynamic activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Concept Mapping Slide Show
    5/28/2008 WHAT IS A CONCEPT MAP? Novak taught students as young as six years old to make Concept Mapping is a concept maps to represent their response to focus questions such as “What is technique for knowledge water?” and “What causes the Assessing learner understanding seasons?” assessment developed by JhJoseph D. NkNovak in the 1970’s Novak’s work was based on David Ausubel’s theories‐‐stressed the importance of prior knowledge in being able to learn new concepts. If I don’t hold my ice cream cone The ice cream will fall off straight… A WAY TO ORGANIZE A WAY TO MEASURE WHAT WE KNOW HOW MUCH KNOWLEDGE WE HAVE GAINED A WAY TO ACTIVELY A WAY TO IDENTIFY CONSTRUCT NEW CONCEPTS KNOWLEDGE 1 5/28/2008 Semantics networks words into relationships and gives them meaning BRAIN‐STORMING GET THE GIST? oMINDMAP HOW TO TEACH AN OLD WORD CLUSTERS DOG NEW TRICKS?…START WITH FOOD! ¾WORD WEBS •GRAPHIC ORGANIZER 9NETWORKING SCAFFOLDING IT’S ALL ABOUT THE NEXT MEAL, RIGHT FIDO?. EFFECTIVE TOOLS FOR LEARNING COLLABORATIVE 9CREATE A STUDY GUIDE CREATIVE NOTE TAKING AND SUMMARIZING SEQUENTIAL FIRST FIND OUT WHAT THE STUDENTS KNOW IN RELATIONSHIP TO A VISUAL TRAINING SUBJECT. STIMULATING THEN PLAN YOUR TEACHING STRATEGIES TO COVER THE UNKNOWN. PERSONAL COMMUNICATING NEW IDEAS ORGANIZING INFORMATION 9AS A KNOWLEDGE ASSESSMENT TOOL REFLECTIVE LEARNING (INSTEAD OF A TEST) A POST‐CONCEPT MAP WILL GIVE INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT HAS TEACHING VOCABULARLY BEEN LEARNED ASSESSING KNOWLEDGE 9PLANNING TOOL (WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?) IF THERE ARE GAPS IN LEARNING, RE‐INTEGRATE INFORMATION, TYING IT TO THE PREVIOUSLY LEARNED INFORMATION THE OBJECT IS TO GENERATE THE LARGEST How do you construct a concept map? POSSIBLE LIST Planning a concept map for your class IN THE BEGINNING… LIST ANY AND ALL TERMS AND CONCEPTS BRAINSTORMING STAGE ASSOCIATED WITH THE TOPIC OF INTEREST ORGANIZING STAGE LAYOUT STAGE WRITE THEM ON POST IT NOTES, ONE WORD OR LINKING STAGE PHRASE PER NOTE REVISING STAGE FINALIZING STAGE DON’T WORRY ABOUT REDUNCANCY, RELATIVE IMPORTANCE, OR RELATIONSHIPS AT THIS POINT.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2
    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2 February 15, 2006 . DRAFT Cambridge-MIT Institute Multidisciplinary Design Project This Dictionary/Glossary of Engineering terms has been compiled to compliment the work developed as part of the Multi-disciplinary Design Project (MDP), which is a programme to develop teaching material and kits to aid the running of mechtronics projects in Universities and Schools. The project is being carried out with support from the Cambridge-MIT Institute undergraduate teaching programe. For more information about the project please visit the MDP website at http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk or contact Dr. Peter Long Prof. Alex Slocum Cambridge University Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trumpington Street, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 CB2 1PZ. USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1223 332779 tel: +1 617 253 0012 For information about the CMI initiative please see Cambridge-MIT Institute website :- http://www.cambridge-mit.org CMI CMI, University of Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 Miller’s Yard, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Mill Lane, Cambridge MA 02139-4307 Cambridge. CB2 1RQ. USA tel: +44 (0) 1223 327207 tel. +1 617 253 7732 fax: +44 (0) 1223 765891 fax. +1 617 258 8539 . DRAFT 2 CMI-MDP Programme 1 Introduction This dictionary/glossary has not been developed as a definative work but as a useful reference book for engi- neering students to search when looking for the meaning of a word/phrase. It has been compiled from a number of existing glossaries together with a number of local additions.
    [Show full text]