Vol. XIV N. 1.Indb
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
China's Urbanization, Social Restructure and Public
Graduate Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies 9:1 (2014) 55-77 Articles China’s Urbanization, Social Restructure and Public Administration Reforms: An Overview Xiaoyuan Wan University of Sheffield [email protected] Abstract This paper provides a review of the broad process of China’s urbanization and the urban public administration reform since the 1978 reforms, with a focus on the changing public policies in the realms of employment, housing, social insurance and the devolution of government authority. It suggests that the main government rationale of the public administration system reforms was to hand over a part of public services which used to be delivered by the central government and state-owned enterprises (SOEs), to local governments and to devolve a part of responsibility to the private sector, the social sector and individuals. According to these reforms, most of the social services, which could only be enjoyed by the employees of the SOEs were handed over to grassroots governments and aimed to cover more urban population. But at the same time, individuals had to take on more responsibilities of their careers choice and fund part of their own social welfare. This paper concludes by suggesting that with proliferating literature on China’s social and economic transition, further study should be carried out to explore the implementation of the reformed urban public policies by local governments and special concern should be given to the participation of non-government actors in China’s public administration. Introduction SINCE THE LATE 1970S, a series of economic reforms have been driving China to step away from a rigid socialism to a more open and diverse society, in which the urban economy developed at a tremendous speed and played an increasingly important role in the national economy. -
Annual Report, and They Severally and Jointly Accept Legal Responsibility for the Truthfulness, Accuracy and Completeness of Its Contents
(A joint stock limited company incorporated in the People's Republic of China with limited liability) Stock Code: 1618 * For identification purpose only IMPORTANT NOTICE I. The Board and the Supervisory Committee of the Company and its Directors, Supervisors and senior management warrant that there are no false representations, misleading statements contained in or material omissions from the information set out in this annual report, and they severally and jointly accept legal responsibility for the truthfulness, accuracy and completeness of its contents. II. The Company convened the 14th meeting of the third session of the Board on 31 March 2020. All Directors of the Company attended the meeting. III. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA LLP issued an unqualified audit report to the Company. IV. Guo Wenqing, the Chairman and legal representative of the Company, Zou Hongying, the Vice President and the Chief Accountant of the Company, and Fan Wanzhu, the Deputy Chief Accountant and the Head of the Financial Planning Department, have declared that they warrant the truthfulness, accuracy and completeness of the financial report contained in this annual report. V. The proposal for profit distribution or transfer of capital reserve to share capital for the Reporting Period was considered by the Board The net profit attributable to Shareholders of the Company in the audited consolidated statement of MCC in 2019 amounted to RMB6,599,712 thousand and the undistributed profit of MCC headquarters amounted to RMB1,920,906 thousand. Based on the total share capital of 20,723.62 million shares, the Company proposed to distribute to all Shareholders a cash dividend of RMB0.72 (tax inclusive) for every 10 shares and the total cash dividend is RMB1,492,101 thousand, the remaining undistributed profit of RMB428,805 thousand will be used for the operation and development of the Company and rolled over to the coming year for distribution. -
Printmgr File
BUSINESS OVERVIEW We were the largest provider of private education from kindergarten to university in China by student enrolments in the 2015/2016 school year, according to the Frost & Sullivan Report. We had 48,220 students enrolled at our schools for the 2015/2016 school year, giving us a market share of approximately 0.11% in the fragmented PRC private education industry according to the Frost & Sullivan Report. Our University, Zhengzhou Technology and Business University, had 25,063 students enrolled in the 2015/2016 school year, while our 24 “YuHua” branded private schools for K-12 on 16 campuses had an aggregate of 23,157 students enrolled in the same school year. With our significant scale and extensive experience in the private education industry, we believe we are well- placed to benefit from growth and consolidation within the fragmented private education industry. All of our schools are located in Henan Province, a province that has the largest registered population and generated the fifth largest GDP of RMB3.7 trillion among all provinces in China in 2015, according to the Frost & Sullivan Report. The favourable demographics of Henan Province have facilitated the growth of our school network from our inception in 2001 with a single high school to one University and 24 K-12 schools across nine cities with 48,220 students in the 2015/2016 school year. We intend to continue to strengthen our leading position in Henan Province as well as to selectively expand to the surrounding regions of Henan Province. We believe our advanced and established management system has supported our previous business expansion and, together with the growing recognition of our “YuHua” brand, will continue to help us successfully replicate our operating model in new markets. -
Doing Business in China
Doing Business In China DOING BUSINESS IN CHINA INTRODUCTION On January 1, 2020, the Foreign Investment Law of the People’s Republic of China and its implementing regulations became effective, ending an era of thirty years during which foreign investment in China was dominated by a series of legislations specifically formulated for foreign-invested enterprises (“FIEs”). This paper provides in detail the evolution of the Chinese legal system with particular emphasis on an up-to-date overview of the current status of the law, policy, and practice relating to foreign investment in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC” or “China”, which, for purposes of this paper, excludes the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the Macao Special Administrative Region, and Taiwan). This paper also discusses the relevant considerations involved in choosing the form of doing business in China, identifies major issues confronting potential foreign investors, and presents the legal requirements and practical issues associated with various methods of investment from establishment to exit. Doing Business In China TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 PRC LEGAL SYSTEM AND JUDICIARY .............................................. 1 1.1 PRC Legal System ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 PRC Judiciary ........................................................................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 2 FOREIGN INVESTMENT LEGAL REGIME ........................................ -
Japan's Security Relations with China Since 1989
Japan’s Security Relations with China since 1989 The Japanese–Chinese security relationship is one of the most important vari- ables in the formation of a new strategic environment in the Asia-Pacific region which has not only regional but also global implications. The book investigates how and why since the 1990s China has turned in the Japanese perception from a benign neighbour to an ominous challenge, with implications not only for Japan’s security, but also its economy, role in Asia and identity as the first devel- oped Asian nation. Japan’s reaction to this challenge has been a policy of engagement, which consists of political and economic enmeshment of China, hedged by political and military power balancing. The unique approach of this book is the use of an extended security concept to analyse this policy, which allows a better and more systematic understanding of its many inherent contradictions and conflicting dynamics, including the centrifugal forces arising from the Japan–China–US triangular relationship. Many contradictions of Japan’s engagement policy arise from the overlap of military and political power-balancing tools which are part of containment as well as of engagement, a reality which is downplayed by Japan but not ignored by China. The complex nature of engagement explains the recent reinforcement of Japan’s security cooperation with the US and Tokyo’s efforts to increase the security dialogues with countries neighbouring China, such as Vietnam, Myanmar and the five Central Asian countries. The book raises the crucial question of whether Japan’s political leadership, which is still preoccupied with finding a new political constellation and with overcoming a deep economic crisis, is able to handle such a complex policy in the face of an increasingly assertive China and a US alliance partner with strong swings between engaging and containing China’s power. -
The Development of Copycat Towns in China: an Analysis of Their Economic, Social, and Environmental Implications Working Paper WP17DS1
The Development of Copycat Towns in China: An Analysis of Their Economic, Social, and Environmental Implications Working Paper WP17DS1 Daniel Sui Ohio State University Bo Zhao Oregon State University Hui Kong Ohio State University October 2017 The findings and conclusions of this Working Paper reflect the views of the author(s) and have not been subject to a detailed review by the staff of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Contact the Lincoln Institute with questions or requests for permission to reprint this paper. [email protected] © 2017 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Abstract The great urban leap forward in China during the past four decades has dramatically transformed the Chinese landscape across the country as well as Chinese society in many profound ways. By situating the development of xenophilic copycat towns under the broader context of China’s four urban design and development motifs, this report presents an initial study of copycat/shanzhai towns in China through a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach. The qualitative data gathered through on-site interviews and observations reveal multiple unique and local circumstances for the development of these copycat towns while the quantitative analysis and mapping using big data analytics shed light for the first time on the national trend of this phenomena and its manifestations in the local real estate market. Furthermore, the way in which the development of copycat towns still follows the basic laws of supply and demand and market forces should be taken into full consideration. Most of the successful copycat towns covered in this report are either located near a large city, or have convenient transportation infrastructure that makes them accessible from nearby city centers. -
Table of Codes for Each Court of Each Level
Table of Codes for Each Court of Each Level Corresponding Type Chinese Court Region Court Name Administrative Name Code Code Area Supreme People’s Court 最高人民法院 最高法 Higher People's Court of 北京市高级人民 Beijing 京 110000 1 Beijing Municipality 法院 Municipality No. 1 Intermediate People's 北京市第一中级 京 01 2 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Shijingshan Shijingshan District People’s 北京市石景山区 京 0107 110107 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Municipality Haidian District of Haidian District People’s 北京市海淀区人 京 0108 110108 Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Mentougou Mentougou District People’s 北京市门头沟区 京 0109 110109 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Municipality Changping Changping District People’s 北京市昌平区人 京 0114 110114 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Yanqing County People’s 延庆县人民法院 京 0229 110229 Yanqing County 1 Court No. 2 Intermediate People's 北京市第二中级 京 02 2 Court of Beijing Municipality 人民法院 Dongcheng Dongcheng District People’s 北京市东城区人 京 0101 110101 District of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Xicheng District Xicheng District People’s 北京市西城区人 京 0102 110102 of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Fengtai District of Fengtai District People’s 北京市丰台区人 京 0106 110106 Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality 1 Fangshan District Fangshan District People’s 北京市房山区人 京 0111 110111 of Beijing 1 Court of Beijing Municipality 民法院 Municipality Daxing District of Daxing District People’s 北京市大兴区人 京 0115 -
The Emergence of a Land Market in China
_o(*¿-5 THE EMERGENCE OF A I"AI\D IVIARKET IN CHINA A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Jlang Bing to Department of Economics & Centre for Asia Studies The University of Adelaide Adelaide, Australia September 1994 v¡ø.JeJ \ 1Ú\5 ì Contents Contents of Chapters List of Tables List of Figures Abbreviations Research Declaration Acknowledgments Summar5r References CHAPTER I TNTRODUCTTON (P. 17) CFIAPTER 2 SOME THEORETICAL ISSUES IN THE ANALYSIS OF TFIE ECONOMICS OF CHINA'S IAND USE (p. 28) 2. r Ideological changes and the Reform of Land system (p. 2s) 2.2 Re-constructing china's Land ownership system (p. 83) 2.3 The Management of Land with and without a Land Market (P. 38) 2.4Land Prices and Land Uses (p. 42) 2 CFIAPTER 3 CHINA'S DUAL I.AND OWNER*SHIP SYSTEM AND I"AND ADMIMSTRATION (P. 50) 3.1 The Formation of Collective Ownership of Rural Land (P. 5r) 3.2 The Formation of State Ownership of Urban t and (P. 62) 3.3 The Relationship Between State Ownership of Urban Land and Collective Ownership of Rural Land (P. 66) 3.4 Issues Related to Land Ownership (P. 73) 3.5 Land Administration (P. 80) CFIAPTER 4 THE SUPPLY OF AND DEMAND FOR I.AND UNDER THE PI.ANNED ECONOIVTY SYSTEM (P. 93) 4.I The Supply of Land (P. 94) 4.2T}ae Demand for Land and Its Management (P. f 05) 4.3 The Planning and the Market: Problems with Land Supply in a Transitional Economy (P. -
Overview Law of the People's Republic of China on Enterprise
Restructuring & Insolvency Asia Pacific CHINA Law of the People’s Republic of China on Enterprise Bankruptcy Introduction Overview The bankruptcy regime was a major milestone for China. For the first time in its history, China now has a unified and comprehensive On 27 August 2006, the bankruptcy system covering all types of enterprises, including foreign Standing Committee of investment vehicles and state-owned enterprises. the 10th National People’s Similar to many jurisdictions, the bankruptcy regime uses key concepts Congress of the People’s such as: Republic of China (PRC) promulgated the Law Voluntary and involuntary bankruptcy; of the People’s Republic An independent administrator; of China on Enterprise Involvement of creditors in the administration of the bankruptcy; Bankruptcy (Bankruptcy Law), which came into Restructuring and settlement; force on 1 June 2007. Extraterritoriality, allowing property outside China and certain foreign proceedings to fall within the regime; Voidable transactions; and Ratable distribution. A significant feature of the legislation relates to the protection of workers’ rights. The regime ranks employees ahead of other unsecured creditors but behind secured creditors, who retain their priority over secured assets. Applicable legislation The administrator reports to the People’s Court and is supervised by the creditors’ meeting and The Bankruptcy Law, which consists of 136 the creditors’ committee. The creditors’ meeting articles organized into 12 chapters, applies to has the ability to replace the administrator or all types of insolvent enterprises, whether to seek his removal should he fail in performing state-owned or privately owned, and includes his duties in a lawful and impartial manner, foreign investment enterprises and financial or if the creditors’ meeting deems there institutions. -
Chinese Trademark Approval Procedure Is a Trademark Protection Safeguard Or Another National Protectionism?
THE JOHN MARSHALL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW EXPLORING APPLE’S IPAD TRADEMARK BLUNDER: CHINESE TRADEMARK APPROVAL PROCEDURE IS A TRADEMARK PROTECTION SAFEGUARD OR ANOTHER NATIONAL PROTECTIONISM? ARTHUR TAN-CHI YUAN ABSTRACT It is well-reported that Apple’s iPad® product embodies technological advances that are protected by U.S. and foreign patents. One would also assume that it is protected by trademarks in various jurisdictions, including China. However, to this day, Apple struggles to prefect its iPad trademark rights in China, the second largest economy in the world. While the Chinese trademark registration approval process is different from that in U.S. practice, this approval step is essential to every international corporation doing business in China. This article explains where Apple may have overlooked this step in the overall trademark registration process in China and how other corporations should avoid the same. The article further examines the basis behind this process and explains that the underlying reasoning is not too difficult for non-Chinese jurisdictions to understand and appreciate. This “approval” process under the Chinese trademark implementing regulations is critical and vital to eliminating unnecessary legal disputes as well as securing long- term success in the protection of trademark rights in China. Copyright © 2012 The John Marshall Law School Cite as Arthur Tan-Chi Yuan, Exploring Apple’s iPad Trademark Blunder: Chinese Trademark Approval Procedure Is a Trademark Protection Safeguard or Another National Protectionism?, 11 J. MARSHALL REV. INTELL. PROP. L. 777 (2012). EXPLORING APPLE’S IPAD TRADEMARK BLUNDER: CHINESE TRADEMARK APPROVAL PROCEDURE IS A TRADEMARK PROTECTION SAFEGUARD OR ANOTHER NATIONAL PROTECTIONISM? ARTHUR TAN-CHI YUAN INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... -
Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Sheep in Inner Mongolia Province, China
Parasite 27, 11 (2020) Ó X. Yan et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2020008 Available online at: www.parasite-journal.org RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in sheep in Inner Mongolia Province, China Xinlei Yan1,a,*, Wenying Han1,a, Yang Wang1, Hongbo Zhang2, and Zhihui Gao3 1 Food Science and Engineering College of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010018, PR China 2 Inner Mongolia Food Safety and Inspection Testing Center, Hohhot 010090, PR China 3 Inner Mongolia KingGoal Technology Service Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010010, PR China Received 6 January 2020, Accepted 8 February 2020, Published online 19 February 2020 Abstract – Toxoplasma gondii is an important zoonotic parasite that can infect almost all warm-blooded animals, including humans, and infection may result in many adverse effects on animal husbandry production. Animal husbandry in Inner Mongolia is well developed, but data on T. gondii infection in sheep are lacking. In this study, we determined the seroprevalence and risk factors associated with the seroprevalence of T. gondii using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test. A total of 1853 serum samples were collected from 29 counties of Xilin Gol League (n = 624), Hohhot City (n = 225), Ordos City (n = 158), Wulanchabu City (n = 144), Bayan Nur City (n = 114) and Hulunbeir City (n = 588). The overall seroprevalence of T. gondii was 15.43%. Risk factor analysis showed that seroprevalence was higher in sheep 12 months of age (21.85%) than that in sheep <12 months of age (10.20%) (p < 0.01). -
Regulatory Overview
THIS DOCUMENT IS IN DRAFT FORM, INCOMPLETE AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND THE INFORMATION MUST BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SECTION HEADED “WARNING” ON THE COVER OF THIS DOCUMENT. REGULATORY OVERVIEW REGULATORY OVERVIEW This section sets out a summary of the most significant PRC laws and regulations that affect our business and the industry in which we operate. REGULATIONS ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF REAL ESTATE ENTERPRISES Establishment of a Real Estate Development Enterprise According to the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Administration of Urban Real Estate (中 華人民共和國城市房地產管理法) (the “Urban Real Estate Law”) promulgated by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (中華人民共和國全國人大常委會) (the “SCNPC”), effective on 1 January 1995, amended on 30 August 2007, 27 August 2009 and 23 September 2012, a real estate developer is defined as an enterprise which engages in the development and sale of real estate for the purpose of making profits. Under the Regulations on Administration of Development of Urban Real Estate (城市房地產開發經營管理條例) (the “Development Regulations”) promulgated and implemented by the State Council on 20 July 1998, and amended on 8 January 2011, an enterprise which is to engage in development of real estate shall satisfy the following requirements: 1) its registered capital shall be RMB1 million or more; and 2) it shall have four or more full-time professional real estate/construction technicians and two or more full-time accounting officers, each of whom shall hold the relevant qualification certificate. The Development Regulations also stipulates that the local government of a province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the central government may, based on local circumstances, impose more stringent requirements on the registered capital and the professional personnel of a real estate developer.