DOCSLIB.ORG

Breeding Bird Survey 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Breeding Bird Survey 2015 BREEDING BIRD SURVEY 2015 Rufford Colliery Harworth Estates Applied Ecological Services Ltd Ramshaw House, Ramshaw County Durham AES-LTD DL14 0NG [email protected] 01388 835084 AES-LTD Field Investigations and Data Where field investigations have been carried out these have been restricted to a level of detail required to achieving the stated objectives of the work. Where any data supplied by the client or from other sources have been used it has been assumed that the information is correct. No responsibility can be accepted by AES - Ltd for inaccuracies in the data supplied by any other party. Copyright © Applied Ecological Services Ltd (AES-LTD 2015). All rights reserved. This document has been provided for your reference by Applied Ecological Services Ltd . No material from this document may be otherwise copied, altered, republished, transmitted or distributed in any way without permission. Third Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by AES – Ltd at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made as to the professional advice included in this report Report Reference & History: Document 1, version 1 Name Signature Date Originators Alan Jones (AJ) April / July 2015 Authors AJ July 2015 Approved By AES - Ltd July 2015 2 Applied Ecological Services Ltd AES-LTD CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 4 2.0 Legislation and policy background .............................................................. 5 THE UK BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN ................................................................ 6 THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN .................................. 6 3.0 Methods........................................................................................................... 7 DATA SEARCH ...................................................................................................... 7 WALKOVER SURVEYS ......................................................................................... 7 4.0 Results ............................................................................................................ 9 DESK STUDY ......................................................................................................... 9 Table 1: NBN Gateway Records ............................................................................. 9 HABITATS ............................................................................................................ 11 BREEDING BIRD SURVEY 2015 ......................................................................... 11 TABLE 2: WALKOVER SURVEY DETAILS ......................................................... 11 TABLE 3: SPECIES RECORDED DURING THE BREEDING SEASON 2015 (Part 1) .......................................................................................................................... 12 TABLE 3: SPECIES RECORDED DURING THE BREEDING SEASON 2015 (Part 2) .......................................................................................................................... 13 BREEDING STATUS KEY .................................................................................... 14 BREEDING SPECIES ACCOUNTS 2015 ............................................................ 15 5.0 Discussion & recommendations .................................................................. 24 List of Figures: Figure 1: Rufford Breeding Bird Survey Visit 1 Figure 2: Rufford Breeding Bird Survey Visit 2 Figure 3 Rufford Breeding Bird Survey Visit 3 Figure 4: Rufford Breeding Bird Survey Visit 4 Figure 6: Rufford Breeding Bird Territory Map 2015 Figure 7: Rufford Woodlark Sightings 2015 Figure 8: Rufford Walkover Route 3 Applied Ecological Services Ltd AES-LTD 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This report details the results of monthly breeding bird surveys undertaken by Alan Jones, ornithologist with AES Ltd. during April through to July 2015 at the former Rufford Colliery, Rainworth, Mansfield. The site, situated at grid reference SK 593 603 (approximate central point), exists mainly as large areas of hard standing, spoil heaps and bare ground with some mixed woodland, scrub, heath land and a reed lined lake. 1.2 Areas within the site are currently being developed and these areas as well as the less disturbed areas and parts of restored site were subject to surveys. 4 Applied Ecological Services Ltd AES-LTD 2.0 LEGISLATION AND POLICY BACKGROUND 2.1 Birds are afforded various levels of protection and levels of conservation status on a species by species basis, with the inclusion of a number of species on the following legislation or lists of conservation concern: Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) [Department of the Environment (1981)]. EC Birds Directive 1979 (79/409/EEC). UK Biodiversity Action Plan (1995) lists of globally threatened or declining species Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) Red and Amber Lists of species of conservation concern (RSPB, 2002). 2.2 The most significant general legislation for British birds lies within Part 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). Under this legislation it is an offence to: Kill, injure or take any wild bird; Take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest is in use or being built; Take or destroy an egg of any wild bird. 2.3 In addition to the above protection for breeding birds under the Wildlife and Countryside Act, Schedule 1 of the Act lists a number of species which are protected by special penalties at all times. 2.4 Annex 1 of the EC Birds Directive also lists rare and vulnerable species of wild birds that are subject to special conservation measures. 2.5 The RSPB (2002) has published Red and Amber Lists of species of conservation concern. Red List species are those whose breeding population or range is rapidly declining (50% or more in the last 25 years), recently or historically, and those of global conservation concern. Amber List species are those whose breeding population is in moderate decline (25 – 49% in the last 25 years), rare breeders, internationally important and localised species and those of unfavourable conservation status in Europe. 5 Applied Ecological Services Ltd AES-LTD THE UK BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2.6 The UK Biodiversity Action Plan (UKBAP) (2007) lists 59 bird species as priority species requiring conservation action, and consequently action plans have been developed for the conservation of these species. THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2.7 The Nottinghamshire Biodiversity Action Plan (NBAP) lists 32 bird species as priority species requiring conservation action. 6 Applied Ecological Services Ltd AES-LTD 3.0 METHODS 3.1 Survey design, methodology, fieldwork and assessment has been carried out in accordance with standard guidance Bibby et al. 19921 and Gilbert et al. 19982 DATA SEARCH 3.2 A data search was carried out for all faunal/ floral groups and statutory and non- statutory protected sites. This included the following contacts with respect to birds: National Biodiversity Network Gateway (NBN) Information from the Survey Area and the surrounding area (up to 2km distance from the survey boundary) was requested. WALKOVER SURVEYS 3.3 During survey visits, a predetermined transect route, was walked at a slow pace so that all birds can be located, identified and recorded using standard British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) notation. Also two vantage points (VP`s) were located and a period of 30 minutes was spent on each VP recording bird activity in the viewable area. Binoculars and telescopes were used throughout to scan the open for the presence of birds. All species are identified by their common name followed by their Latin equivalent. Bird species are listed with their BTO Code and their Conservation Status3, if they have red or amber status they are listed as species of conservation concern (SCC). UK Biodiversity Action Plan Species (UKBAP) and Local Biodiversity Action Plan Species (LBAP) are also identified. All birds that were observed during the surveys were recorded including breeding species, passing individuals and species on migration. 3.4 Optimal times for breeding bird survey occur between dawn and mid-morning (approximately 10.30am) and from early evening (approximately 5.30pm) to dusk. 1 Bibby, C.J., N.D. Burgess & D.A. Hill (1992): Bird Census Techniques. London: Academic Press. 2 Gilbert et. al. (1998) Bird Monitoring Methods. RSPB. Sandy. 3 The UK's birds can be split in to three categories of conservation importance - red, amber and green. Red is the highest conservation priority, with species needing urgent action. Amber is the next most critical group, followed by green. 7 Applied Ecological Services Ltd AES-LTD During these times, breeding birds are more active and can be detected in song more frequently. 3.5 Nesting and territorial behaviour (singing, nest building, carrying food, fighting, copulation, nest locations, alarm calling, carrying faecal sacs) were noted by standard codes, as were the age and sex of the birds concerned where observed. Non-nesting behaviour such as over-flying the site was also noted, together with the direction of movement. Birds not considered likely to be nesting on site were still noted where observed. 3.6 Results obtained
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Host Alarm Calls Attract the Unwanted Attention of the Brood Parasitic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Host alarm calls attract the unwanted attention of the brood parasitic common cuckoo Attila Marton 1,2*, Attila Fülöp 2,3, Katalin Ozogány1, Csaba Moskát 4,5 & Miklós Bán 1,3,5 It is well known that avian brood parasites lay their eggs in the nests of other bird species, called hosts. It remains less clear, however, just how parasites are able to recognize their hosts and identify the exact location of the appropriate nests to lay their eggs in. While previous studies attributed high importance to visual signals in fnding the hosts’ nests (e.g. nest building activity or the distance and direct sight of the nest from vantage points used by the brood parasites), the role of host acoustic signals during the nest searching stage has been largely neglected. We present experimental evidence that both female and male common cuckoos Cuculus canorus pay attention to their host’s, the great reed warbler’s Acrocephalus arundinaceus alarm calls, relative to the calls of an unparasitized species used as controls. Parallel to this, we found no diference between the visibility of parasitized and unparasitized nests during drone fights, but great reed warblers that alarmed more frequently experienced higher rates of parasitism. We conclude that alarm calls might be advantageous for the hosts when used against enemies or for alerting conspecifcs, but can act in a detrimental manner by providing important nest location cues for eavesdropping brood parasites. Our results suggest that host alarm calls may constitute a suitable trait on which cuckoo nestlings can imprint on to recognize their primary host species later in life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Field Identification of North American Pipits Ben King Illustrated by Peter Hayman and Pieter Prall
    The field identification of North American pipits Ben King Illustrated by Peter Hayman and Pieter Prall LTHOUGHTHEWATER PIPIT (Anthus ground in open country. However, the in this paper. inoletta) and the Sprague's Pipit two speciesof tree-pipits use trees for (Antbus spragueit)are fairly easy to rec- singing and refuge and are often in NCEABIRD HAS been recognized asa ogmze using the current popular field wooded areas. pipit, the first thing to checkis the guides, the five species more recently All the pipits discussedin the paper, ground color of the back. Is it brown added to the North American list are except perhaps the Sprague's, move (what shade?), olive, or gray? Then note more difficult to identify and sometimes their tails in a peculiarpumping motion, the black streaks on the back. Are they present a real field challenge. The field down and then up. Some species broad or narrow, sharply or vaguely de- •dentffication of these latter specieshas "pump" their tails more than others. fined, conspicuousor faint? How exten- not yet been adequatelydealt with in the This tail motion is often referred to as sive are they? Then check for pale North American literature. However, "wagging." While the term "wag" does streaks on the back. Are there none, much field work on the identification of include up and down motion as well as two, four, many? What color are they-- pipits has been done in the last few side to side movement, it is better to use whitish, buff, brownish buff? Are they years, especially in Alaska and the the more specificterm "pump" which is conspicuousor faint? Discerningthese Urnted Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter of the Nest Record Scheme
    The newsletter of the Nest Record Scheme Issue 30 MAY 2014 InsIde thIs edItIon 02 news roundup 03 dAvId glue 1947–2014 04 A recorder reFlecTs 05 All-TIMe Top recorders 06 A 13,000 pAge suMMArY 07 Treecreeper boxes 08 nrs AnnuAl Totals 10 nrs MenTorIng 12 moorlAnd MonITorIng 13 runway plovers 14 rockIT scIence 15 nrs latesT resulTs 16 spoT The nesT This season sees the official launch of NRS mentoring. See the article on page 10, and visit www.bto.org/ volunteer-surveys/nrs/taking- part/nrs-mentoring to find your nearest mentor (screenshot below). Top: Bernard Pleasance, John Dries, Tony Davis, Josh Marshall and Richard Castell at the NRS 75th anniversary conference. Left: Veteran recorder David Warden photographing a nest box in 1949. Right: A young nest recorder checking a Song Thrush nest with a mirror in 2011. 75 years of nesting he Hatching and Fledgling year, 80 such volunteers came to the Inquiry was started by the BTO Nunnery for a day of celebrating the T in 1939 to collect information on success of NRS and looking forward facets of basic breeding biology, such to its future. It was thrilling to see as incubation and fledging periods. In like-minded ornithologists from all the first five years, 1,988 nest record over the country meeting up to talk cards were sent in by c.20 participants. about nest recording. We enjoyed Seventy five years on, the Nest Record talks from speakers including David Scheme (NRS) has c.660 active Warden, a recorder since 1948, and recorders and an amazing 1.6 million Josh Marshall, a recorder since 2013! nest records have been collected, an NRS mentor Mark Lawrence gave The NRS mentoring scheme invaluable dataset that has been used a talk to mark the official launch of is generously sponsored by for scientific study far beyond the scope NRS mentoring (see p 10), which of the original inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Suffolk Coast & Heaths
    Birds of The Suffolk Coast & Heaths Holiday Report 22 - 25 May 2017 Led by Ed Hutchings Greenwings Wildlife Holidays Tel: 01473 254658 Web: www.greenwings.co.uk Email: [email protected] ©Greenwings 2017 Introduction The county of Suffolk, like the rest of East Anglia, is a gem for birding. Few have mastered its diversity. From the River Stour in the south, to the River Waveney and the Broads in the north and from The Brecks in the west to the coast in the east, the county provides something for everyone. The Suffolk Coast and Heaths Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty is a stunning landscape, packed full of wildlife within 155 square miles of tranquil and unspoilt landscape, including wildlife-rich estuaries, ancient heaths, windswept shingle beaches and historic towns and villages. Birding in Suffolk is a joy as the landscape of the county is diverse, and so is the range of wildlife that inhabits it. This bird holiday would focus on spring birds in the wonderful habitats found on the Suffolk coast. Group members: Nigel Baelz, Stuart Barnes and Louise Rowlands. There now follows a summary of the activities and highlights from each day, a photo gallery, and a bird species list at the end. Day 1: Monday 22nd May 2017 The guests were met on a hot sunny day at the Westleton Crown by their guide Ed Hutchings for an introduction and a quick bite to eat. The Westleton Crown is a friendly hotel on the Suffolk coast and would be our base for the break. After checking into the hotel after lunch, we headed south to North Warren RSPB near Aldeburgh for the afternoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Spring 2021
    REPORT OF BIRDLIFE ON ASHDOWN FOREST EARLY SPRING 2021 February 2021 was cold as usual, but the weather was not severe enough to kill off our population of resident DARTFORD WARBLERS. They could be heard calling while sheltering in thick gorse, where they hunted for spiders, their crucial winter diet. Occasionally a fleeting glimpse of a tiny dark-coloured long-tailed bird would confirm the presence of a “furze wren”, the old Sussex name for Dartford Warbler. They rely on heather for nesting and gorse for shelter and most of their food supply. Darford Warbler by Clive Poole Our second avian UK rarity is the WOODLARK and our breeding population arrived back on the Forest in early February from their wintering grounds on the south coast or across the Channel (without needing to comply with lockdown restrictions). This season they have benefited locally from the gorse-management activities of the Conservators, who have removed some large blocks of very tall old straggly gorse, useless for wildlife. This has left areas of bare ground, gorse litter and scattered seeds. Just the job for WOODLARKS who are opportunistic colonisers Woodlark by Clive Poole after fire damage or major ground disturbance. Paradoxically, they both feed and breed on the ground on open heaths (not in woods despite their name) searching the bare and battered ground for seeds and insects. They also favour feeding on short grass grazed by rabbits. An early surprise was to find a male REDSTART on 30th March 2021. He had arrived about a week earlier than usual, making use of a couple of warm days with southerly winds to stage the final leg (across the Channel), of his long journey from his wintering grounds in Gambia or even further south in tropical Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual Wintering Records of Pipits (Aves: Motacillidae) in Hatay, Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey
    Turkish Journal of Zoology Turk J Zool (2015) 39: 74-79 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/zoology/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1311-49 Unusual wintering records of pipits (Aves: Motacillidae) in Hatay, Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey Ali ATAHAN, Orhan GÜL*, Mehmet ATAHAN, Mehmet GÜL Subaşı Birdwatching Society, Subaşı Beldesi, Hatay, Turkey Received: 25.11.2013 Accepted: 08.05.2014 Published Online: 02.01.2015 Printed: 30.01.2015 Abstract: We studied the unusual wintering records of some rare pipit species during winter in Hatay Province, in the Eastern Mediterranean Region of Turkey. Through intensive field observations performed between 2007 and 2013, 8 pipit species were recorded in the province. Among the observations, 59 were unusual wintering records belonging to 5 pipit species. In this article, we present observations on frequency and seasonality of each pipit species observed in Hatay Province. Meadow, water, and red-throated pipits were already known as winter visitors to the region, but for the first time in this study, we observed buff-bellied, Richard’s, tree, tawny, and Blyth’s pipits in Hatay Province during winter. In light of our observations, we suggest that all 5 species—especially buff-bellied, Richard’s, and tree pipits—might be regular winter visitors to Hatay. Key words: Anthus spp., Aves, Eastern Mediterranean, Hatay, pipits, Turkey, unusual wintering records 1. Introduction Following this unusual observation, we decided to study Pipits are a group of wagtails, which are small, mainly the region in detail to explore the possibility of pipits not terrestrial, and insectivorous birds generally observed only passing through Hatay during migration but also in grasslands and wet meadows, although a few prefer using the region as a regular wintering ground, given shrubby or rocky habitats (Snow and Perrins, 1998; the presence of adequate habitats and suitable weather Alström and Mild, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Throated Pipit Anthus Cervinus in Australia
    VOL. 17 (1) MARCH 1997 3 AUSTRALIAN BIRD WATCHER 1997, 17, 3-10 Red-throated Pipit Anthus cervinus in Australia by MIKE CARTER, 30 Canadian Bay Road, Mt Eliza, Victoria 3930 Summary A Red-throated Pipit Anthus cervinus was at Broome, Western Australia, from 6 to 9 January 1992. This first record for Australia is described. Identification criteria and difficulties are discussed. This occurrence followed a season in which unprecedented numbers of Red-throated Pipits were recorded along the Pacific coast of North America. It is suggested that the two events are a consequence of a successful breeding season in the Arctic in 1991. Introduction Soon after dawn on 6 January 1992, George Swann, Neil Macumber, Tom Smith and I went to the main sporting oval in Broome, Western Australia. We found a pipit Anthus sp. which was smaller, darker and more boldly marked than the Australian Richard's Pipit A. novaeseelandiae australis. Realising that it was a species not previously recorded in Australia, we studied the bird intently for half an hour before, alarmed by our constant pursuit, it disappeared. We then acquired whatever literature was immediately available on the subject of pipits and attempted to resolve the problem of identification. Swann searched the oval again on 7 January unsuccessfully, but the pipit was relocated next day and also on 9 January. Over these two days, Swann, Macumber and myself each spent between five and ten hours observing the bird, refining our descriptions and obtaining photographs. The data we obtained enabled identification to be confirmed as a Red-throated Pipit A.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimates of Breeding Bird Abundance and Habitat Use in Thetford Forest Park
    TITL BTO RESEARCH REPORT 531 Estimates of breeding bird abundance and habitat use in Thetford Forest Park. Greg Conway & Ian Henderson BTO Research Report No. 531 Estimates of Breeding Bird Abundance and Habitat Use in Thetford Forest Park Authors Greg Conway & Ian Henderson Report of work carried out by The British Trust for Ornithology for the Forestry Commission England March 2009 © British Trust for Ornithology British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 CONTENTS Page No. List of Tables ......................................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................ 5 List of Appendices ................................................................................................................................. 7 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 9 2. METHODS ............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Survey Sampling Design ........................................................................................................ 11 2.2 Field Methods ......................................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Habitat
    [Show full text]
  • A Reassessment of Meadow Pipit Anthus Pratensis Records from India, and Their Rejection
    60 Indian BIRDS VOL. 13 NO. 3 (PUBL. 29 JUNE 2017) point out how immature specimens of Erythropus vespertinus and its Eastern Naoroji, R., 2006. Birds of prey of the Indian Subcontinent. 1st ed. London: representative E. amurensis, are to be distinguished: …”]. Stray Feathers 2 (6): Christopher Helm. Pp. 1–704. 527–529. Radde, G., 1863. Reisen im Süden von Ost-Sibirien in den Jahren 1855–1859. Vol. 2. Hume, A. O., 1879. A rough tentative list of the birds of India. Stray Feathers 8 (1): St. Petersburg. 73–122. Rasmussen, P. C., & Anderton, J. C., 2012. Birds of South Asia: the Ripley guide: Katzner, T. E., Bragin, E. A., Bragin, A. E., McGrady, M., Miller, T. A., & Bildstein, K. L., attributes and status. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C. and Barcelona: Smithsonian 2016. Unusual clockwise loop migration lengthens travel distances and increases Institution and Lynx Edicions. Vol. 2 of 2 vols. Pp. 1–683. potential risks for a central Asian, long distance, trans-equatorial migrant, the Red- Roberts, T. J., 1991. The birds of Pakistan: Regional Studies and non-passeriformes. 1st footed Falcon Falco vespertinus. Bird Study 63: 406–412. ed. Karachi: Oxford University Press. Vol. 1 of 2 vols. Pp. i–xli, 1–598. Kerr, K. C. R., Stoeckle M. Y., Dove C. J., Weigt L. A., Francis C. M., & Hebert P. D. N., Scott, D. A., 2008. Rare birds in Iran in the late 1960s and 1970s. Podoces 3: 1–30. 2007. Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Molecular Scott, D. A., & Adhami, A., 2006. An updated checklist of the birds of Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Motacillidae Species Tree
    Motacillidae Forest Wagtail, Dendronanthus indicus Dendronanthus Mountain Wagtail, Motacilla clara Cape Wagtail, Motacilla capensis Sao Tome Shorttail, Motacilla bocagii Madagascan Wagtail, Motacilla flaviventris Gray Wagtail, Motacilla cinerea Motacilla Western Yellow Wagtail, Motacilla flava Citrine Wagtail, Motacilla citreola Eastern Yellow Wagtail, Motacilla tschutschensis White-browed Wagtail, Motacilla maderaspatensis Mekong Wagtail, Motacilla samveasnae Japanese Wagtail, Motacilla grandis White Wagtail, Motacilla alba African Pied Wagtail, Motacilla aguimp Upland Pipit, Corydalla sylvana Australian Pipit, Corydalla australis New Zealand Pipit, Corydalla novaeseelandiae Corydalla Tawny Pipit, Corydalla campestris Berthelot’s Pipit, Corydalla berthelotii Richard’s Pipit, Corydalla richardi Paddyfield Pipit, Corydalla rufula Blyth’s Pipit, Corydalla godlewskii Plain-backed Pipit, Corydalla leucophrys Wood Pipit, Corydalla nyassae Long-billed Pipit, Corydalla similis African Pipit, Corydalla cinnamomea Malindi Pipit, Corydalla melindae Buffy Pipit, Corydalla vaalensis Long-legged Pipit, Corydalla pallidiventris Sokoke Pipit, Cinaedium sokokense Short-tailed Pipit, Cinaedium brachyurum Bushveld Pipit, Cinaedium caffrum Cinaedium Mountain Pipit, Cinaedium hoeschi Striped Pipit, Cinaedium lineiventre African Rock Pipit, Cinaedium crenatum Golden Pipit, Tmetothylacus tenellus Tm e t o t h y l a c u s Yellow-breasted Pipit, Hemimacronyx chloris Hemimacronyx Sharpe’s Longclaw, Hemimacronyx sharpei Abyssinian Longclaw, Macronyx flavicollis Fuelleborn’s
    [Show full text]
  • Field Identification of Pechora Pipit C
    Field identification of Pechora Pipit C. D. R. Heard and G. Walbridge lthough there have been 29 accepted records of Pechora Pipit Anthus A.gustavi for the United Kingdom up to the end of 1986, only three of these have been away from Shetland. It seems certain that more are occurring farther south, but escaping detection, and a lack of knowledge about the true field appearance of this species may well be perpetuating this situation. A recent record from Portland, Dorset (on 27th September 1983, see Brit. Birds 78: 566), revealed some confusion amongst record assessors over the identification criteria, and this paper has grown out of the clarification of the species' characteristics which was needed before that record was finally accepted. In order to confirm the plumage characters, we checked all the skins of Pechora Pipit in the British Museum (Natural History), Tring, for variations, and critically assessed a continued... 452 Identification of Pechora Pipit 453 sample of 35 for each identification feature. We also took the opportunity to examine skins of Red-throated Pipit A. cervinus (of which we also have extensive Palearctic field experience); this is the principal confusion species, with which we frequently make comparison. We have also assumed a degree of familiarity with Meadow A. pratensis and Tree Pipits A. trivialis: observers should also beware of the effects of moult on the plumage appearance, and apparent structure, of these species. In the past, field guides and handbooks have usually stressed the similarity of Pechora Pipit to Tree Pipit, while ringers' texts have warned against confusion with Red-throated.
    [Show full text]