Further Notes on Pipit Identification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Further Notes on Pipit Identification IDENTIFICATION Further notes on pipit identification Lars Svensson TIS WITH SOM,E surprise I read Ken- According to Parkes, first winter "First winten--Like adult.", and in the neth C. Parkes contribution on pipit Meadow Pipitsdiffer clearly from adults very useful monograph by B.P. Hall identification in American Birds (1982). as to plumagecolor, and color of legs. (1961), nothing is said about differing May a European ornithologist, fairly I do not agree. I have examined first fall plumages. familiar with the Europeanspecies, give numerous specimensin various collec- In most speciesof the genusAnthus, his reaction? tions and live birds in the hand with the juveniles differ very slightly from first Parkes discusses the difficulty of object of detecting any suchdifference winter birds and adults by being on av- separating Meadow Pipit, Anthus which would be helpful to bandersand erage a little browner above and some- pratensis, and (Brown) Tree Pipit, A. which could have been included in my times more yellowish below, and by trivialis, expanding what King (1981) "Identification Guide to European Pas- having a tendency to be more boldly wrote in his very useful paper. Drawing sefines" (1970, 1975), I have found no streaked. The juvenile plumage is re- from his experience from two visits in reliable aging criterion whatsoever placed by the first winter plumage October to St. Agnes, Isles of Scilly, (apart from the degree of skull ossifica- through a molt in late July to early Sep- England, Parkes warns•even stronger tion) in this species, and this is equally tember. After this molt, the age classes, than King did--that first fall Meadow true forA. trivialis and the others. In the being extremely similar before it, be- Pipits look very similar to Tree Pipits, excellent "Handbook of British Birds" come inseparablein the field. so similar that they are easily confused. (Witherby et al. 1939-41) you read: Nine times out of ten, European or- PublloatlonsAvailable : The Speciesof MiddleAmerican Birds. Eugene Eisenmann. 1955. Transactions 7. 128 pp. $4.80.List of species recorded,Mexico to Panamainclusive, with suggested English names, outline of distribution,annotated bibliography. Developmentof BehaviorIn PrecoclalBirds. Margaret Morse Nice. 1962. Transactions 8.211 pp. $4.80. Classic study of behaviordevelopment in animalswith emphasis on representative precocial birds. ColonlelWaterbird Group: Second Annual Meeting: Invited Papers. 1980. Transactions 9. 158 pp. $12. Tenpapers on habitats,distribution and ecologyof seabirds,colony-site trends, coastal surveys and censusingmethods, effects of toxicpollutants by W.R.P.Bourne, R. GB. Brown,W. H. Drury,I.C. 7• Nisbet et al. Proceedings71.1958-1970. 219 pp. $7.20.Includes Supplement to Birdsof NewYork Area by John Bull; Supplement to Birdsof Central and Prospect Parks by Geoffrey Carleton; four papers on the Common and Roseate terns of Great Gull Islandby Helen Hays, L. H. Heilbrun,C. Pessino.D. Cooper. Proceedings72. 1970-74.130 pp. $8.40.Includes four papers on Common and Least terns by M. E. Davis,D. B Ford, M. Gochfeld,B W.Massey, R. G. Wolk. Proceedings73. 1974-1977.108 pp. $7.20.Includes papers on breedingpopulations of ternsand skimmers on Long IslandSound and easternLong Island, gull/tern interactions, and waterbirdsof JeromePark Reservoir by D. Duffy, P. Houde, W. Sedwitz. The Birdsof Great Gull Island 1966-1972.David Duffy and CatherineLaFarge. 44 pp. $2.40. Includesbrief history of islandand its bird life,with banding data and bibliography.Illustrated. ALL SEVEN PUBLICATIONS BARGAIN RATE: $42. PRE-PAID. ToOrder send check or money order payable to TheLinnaean Society of New York. Prices include postage and handling. Sendorders to: Secreta.ry, Linnaean Society of New York, 15 West 77th Street, New York, New York 10024 234 AmericanBirds, March-April 1983 nithologistshave no problems at all in erby et al., 1oc. cit.); thus often eest- ("Olive Tree Pipit") A. hodgsoni, but separating Meadow and Tree Pipits eest-eestwhen rising in hopping flight. the call of the latter is said to be gener- thanks to the call notes. These birds call There is no strident, hoarse quality in ally finer and more drawn out, ap- frequently, and their callsare very char- this call. (Only risk of confusion is with proaching Red-throated Pipit, A. cer- actenstic. Parkes dismisses the value or Rock/Water Pipit, A. spinoletta,which vinus, in quality though not quite aefine usefulness of calls in a fashion which I has a very similar call, although gener- and high. Alarm on breeding grounds is find difficult to understand. He says: ally discernibly more sharp, intenseand a monosyllabic, distinct sip, slowly but "The alleged distinctivehess of calls penetrating; when in doubt, check leg persistentlyrepeated. Occasionally this would be useful only after one was sure color: pratensis pinkish, spinoletta call can be heard from migrating birds one had heard both, preferably by hav- dark.) when more at ease, often too. ing them pointed out by somebodywho perched, but also from flocks on migra- knew the calls, since the written de- tion, a lower, more quiet pip, again of- LITERATURE CITED scriptions are not much help." Which ten in series, are heard, and softer varia- descriptions?All existing ones, or the tions of eest. Alarm is a b/syllabic tissip HALL, B.P. 1961. The taxonomy and method of rendering bird voices with (cf. King), but this is probably only identification of pipits (genus Anthus). letters as such?. heard from breeding birds. Bull of the British Museum (Nat. Hist.), 7:243-289. I stronglyrecommend that American (Brown) Tree Pipit. when flushedor, KING, B. 1981. The field identification of ornithologistswho encounter any of more often, when flying over on migra- North American pipits, American these two European pipits concentrate tion, calls a somewhat drawn-out, Birds, 35:778-788. on the calls initially and then make sup- hoarse, very characteristic tzeeze (or PARKES, K.C. 1982. Further comments on the field identification of North plementarynotes on plumage,leg color, speez). It is never repeated quickly in American pipits. American Birds, behavior, etc. I will try to give written series, but several calls may be heard 36:20-22. descriptions which, hopefully, Parkes from a bird before is has disappeared. SVENSSON, L. 1970, 1975. Identification will find more useful than those he has When flocks are encountered, the calls Guide to European Passerines. First and second editions. Stockholm. consulted before. (But in principle, from several birds may create the im- WITHERBY, H.F., et al. 1939-41. The King has already given adequateinfor- pression that the call is repeated Handbook of British Birds. London. mation.) quickly. According to various sources, MeadowPipit. When flushedutters a and to some colleagues with personal --Sturegatan 60, "nervous," often quickly repeated, experience, the tzeeze call can only be S-114 36 Stockholm, clear, shrill eest (renderedtsiip in With- confused with Olive-backed Pipit Sweden. Introducingthe EcoSound 1 the affordable parabolic microphone system you need *$79.25 to make crystal-clear recordings of nature's sounds to hear and enjoy birdsongfrom remarkable distances to find, identify, and study more birds than ever before An outstandingnew aid for birders, The EcoSoundi system is easy to EcoSound 1 employs a transparent use.Its light weight {laAlbs.}, balance, 18-inch sound reflector, a matched and completelyone-handed operation condensermicrophone, and powerful make it a convenient and effective amplifiers to pick up sounds and hand-held field instrument. Tripod- songsat the very thresholdof hearing mounted next to a spotting scope, it and boost them to the volume you providespossibly the most intimate desirein the super-light,comfortable observational experience you can earphones. have. You can tune in the built-in filters The EcoSound! is shippedready to to emphasizethe particularpitches of turn on and use. The price of $79.25 a target bird and to effectively includesearphones, our 48-pagebird- eliminate traffic and airplane noise. calllistening and recordinghandbook, An automatic volume limiter controls battery,and UPSdelivery in 48 states. Order direct, too-loud sounds. EcoSound 1 gives {Californiaresidents please add sales you the sophisticatedversatility you tax.} or request our free brochure, from need in difficult environmental conditions. battery:9 volt: 10 mA quiescentcurrent Ecological Sound Laboratories frequencyresponse: 200 20,000 Hz + 5 dB The EcoSound1 is ruggedlycon- high passand bandpassfilters tunable400-8,000 H• 776 University Avenue structedto uncompromisingprofes- dual earphone jacks: recordingjack; tripod fitting Los Altos, CA 94022 provided sional instrument standards. 1415! 941-6058 Volume 37, Number 2 235 .
Recommended publications
  • Host Alarm Calls Attract the Unwanted Attention of the Brood Parasitic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Host alarm calls attract the unwanted attention of the brood parasitic common cuckoo Attila Marton 1,2*, Attila Fülöp 2,3, Katalin Ozogány1, Csaba Moskát 4,5 & Miklós Bán 1,3,5 It is well known that avian brood parasites lay their eggs in the nests of other bird species, called hosts. It remains less clear, however, just how parasites are able to recognize their hosts and identify the exact location of the appropriate nests to lay their eggs in. While previous studies attributed high importance to visual signals in fnding the hosts’ nests (e.g. nest building activity or the distance and direct sight of the nest from vantage points used by the brood parasites), the role of host acoustic signals during the nest searching stage has been largely neglected. We present experimental evidence that both female and male common cuckoos Cuculus canorus pay attention to their host’s, the great reed warbler’s Acrocephalus arundinaceus alarm calls, relative to the calls of an unparasitized species used as controls. Parallel to this, we found no diference between the visibility of parasitized and unparasitized nests during drone fights, but great reed warblers that alarmed more frequently experienced higher rates of parasitism. We conclude that alarm calls might be advantageous for the hosts when used against enemies or for alerting conspecifcs, but can act in a detrimental manner by providing important nest location cues for eavesdropping brood parasites. Our results suggest that host alarm calls may constitute a suitable trait on which cuckoo nestlings can imprint on to recognize their primary host species later in life.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Occurrence of White Wagtail (Motacilla Alba) in British Columbia
    Status and Occurrence of White Wagtail (Motacilla alba) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Don Cecile. Introduction and Distribution The White Wagtail (Motacilla alba) is a small passerine species that is found throughout the Old World: breeding from the southeastern tip of Greenland, and Iceland; from Great Britain, south to Morocco, across all of Europe; throughout western Russia, all of Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, along the Himalayas east into southern China, Mongolia, all of eastern Russia, and into western coastal areas of Alaska (Alstrom and Mild 2003). The White Wagtail winters from Great Britain, south throughout western Europe from Germany to Spain, east through Italy, Greece, into Turkey and the Middle East, south into the northern countries of Africa, east to Saudi Arabia, throughout Iraq, Iran, into India, east throughout south east Asia north through southern China, the northern Philippines, Taiwan and Japan (Alstrom and Mild 2003). There are 9 recognized subspecies found throughout the range of the White Wagtail with only 3 having been recorded in North America (Alstrom and Mild 2003). The nominate subspecies of White Wagtail (Motacilla alba alba) has occurred accidentally along the east coast of North America (Hamilton et al. 2007, Dunn and Alderfer 2011). In western North America, the White Wagtails that occur are from the subspecies that make up the (Motacilla alba ocularis/lugens) complex (Sibley 2000, Dunn and Alderfer 2011). These two subspecies were once separate species with one called White Wagtail (Motacilla alba ocularis) and the other called Black-backed Wagtail (Motacilla alba lugens) (Alstrom and Mild 2003). In 2005, the AOU officially lumped Black- backed Wagtail back with White Wagtail and now the Black-backed Wagtail is considered a subspecies of the White Wagtail (Banks et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Methods for the Field Survey and Monitoring of Breeding Short-Eared Owls (Asio Flammeus) in the UK: Final Report from Pilot Fieldwork in 2006 and 2007
    BTO Research Report No. 496 Developing methods for the field survey and monitoring of breeding Short-eared owls (Asio flammeus) in the UK: Final report from pilot fieldwork in 2006 and 2007 A report to Scottish Natural Heritage Ref: 14652 Authors John Calladine, Graeme Garner and Chris Wernham February 2008 BTO Scotland School of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA Registered Charity No. SC039193 ii CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................v LIST OF APPENDICES...........................................................................................................vi SUMMARY.............................................................................................................................vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................... viii CRYNODEB............................................................................................................................xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................................................................xvi 1. BACKGROUND AND AIMS...........................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • American Pipit Anthus Rubescens
    American Pipit Anthus rubescens Folk Name: Water Pipit, Titlark, Skylark, Brownlark Status: Migrant, Winter Visitor Abundance: Uncommon to Common Habitat: Bare-ground, short-grass fields, pastures, lawns, mudflats The American Pipit was once called the Water Pipit and the Titlark. For a time, it was called the Skylark, similar to the Eurasian Skylark—a famous soaring songbird. However, the two are not closely related. “What of the word ‘lark,’ as meaning a frolic? The Anglo- Saxon word ‘lark,’ meaning play. So a sky lark is the bird that frolics, or plays, or rejoices, or ‘larks,’ in the air or s k y.” — The People’s Press, Winston-Salem, March 6, 1857 The American Pipit is a fairly nondescript winter In the late 1870s, Leverett Loomis considered the visitor usually encountered in small loose flocks foraging “Brownlark” as an “abundant” winter resident in Chester on the ground in large open areas of very short grass, County, SC. In North Carolina in 1939, C. S. Brimley mudflats, pasture, or dirt fields. It has a distinctive flight noted that “[r]ecords of Pipits…seem to be totally lacking call that sounds very much like pip pit. At 6 ½ inches, the from the Piedmont region” and requested additional pipit is slightly smaller than our common bluebird. It is pipit records be submitted for use in the second edition gray brown above, and its underparts are buff white and of Birds of North Carolina. William McIlwaine responded streaked. Look closely for a light line above the eye and to Brimley’s request with a list of American Pipit flocks white outer tail feathers.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRAGUE's PIPIT (Anthus Spragueii) STATUS: USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern; No Endangered Species Act Status. SPECIES DE
    SPRAGUE’S PIPIT (Anthus spragueii) STATUS: USFWS Bird of Conservation Concern; No Endangered Species Act status. SPECIES DESCRIPTION: The Sprague's pipit is a small passerine of the family Motacillidae that is endemic to the North American grassland. The Sprague's pipit is about 10-15 centimeters (3.9-5.9 inches) in length, and weighs 22-26 grams (0.8-0.9 ounce), with buff and blackish streaking on the crown, nape, and underparts. It has a plain buffy face with a large eye-ring. The bill is relatively short, narrow, and straight with a blackish upper mandible. The lower mandible is pale with a blackish tip. The wings and tail have two indistinct wing-bars, outer tail feathers are mostly white. Legs are yellowish to pale pinkish-brown. Juveniles are slightly smaller, but similar to adults, with black spotting rather than streaking. Sprague’s pipit is most similar in appearance to the American pipit, which has less streaking (becomes uniformly gray in spring) and dark brown to blackish legs. HABITAT: Nests in short-grass plains, mixed grass prairie, alkaline meadows, and wet meadows where the vegetation is intermediate in height and provides dense cover. More common in native grasslands than areas with introduced grasses. Native grass fields are rare in Arizona but cultivated, dry Bermuda grass, alfalfa fields mixed with patches of dry grass or fallow fields appear to support the species during wintering. They will not use mowed or burned areas until the vegetation has had a chance to grow. RANGE: Breeding range includes portions of south-central Canada, North Dakota, northern portions of South Dakota, Montana, and Minnesota.
    [Show full text]
  • Meadow Pipit Scientific Name: Anthus Pratensis Irish Name: Riabhóg Mhóna by Lewis Gospel
    Bird Life Meadow Pipit Scientific Name: Anthus pratensis Irish Name: Riabhóg Mhóna By Lewis Gospel he meadow pipit is a small bird and is part of the pipit T family. As the first half of its name suggests it can be found in areas of wide open country. The second half of its name dates back all the way to 1768, when it used to be called a tit lark! It is a hard species to tell apart from others in the pipit family. If you look closely it has a thin bill and white, pale pinkish yellow legs with a hind claw at the back of the feet. This claw is a lot longer than its other claws. It mostly likes to eat on the ground and its favourite food in summer are insects and wriggling earthworms. In winter it likes to eat seeds and berries. These give it plenty of energy when other food is not as plentiful. Photos: © Robbie Murphy © Robbie Photos: How you can spot it! If you find yourself in any grassland, heath or moor listen out for a squeaky 'tsip'-like call as the Meadow Pipit travels in little flocks. Be sure to look where you are walking, as these little birds likes to nest on the ground. If disturbed they will rise in ones or twos, or in a little body or group. The Meadow Pipit looks a lot like its close relative the Tree Pipit, and in Ireland there is a subspecies called ‘Anthus pratensis whistleri‘ that is a little darker than the ones you find in other countries in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Bird Survey of the Peak District Moorlands 2004 Moors for the Future Report No 1
    Breeding Bird Survey of the Peak District Moorlands 2004 Moors for the Future Report No 1 Geoff Carr & Peter Middleton Moors for the Future is supported by the National Heritage Lottery Fund The Partners are: English Nature, National Trust, Peak District National Park Authority, United Utilities, Severn Trent Water, Yorkshire Water, Sheffield City Council, Peak Park Moorland Owners and Tenants Association, defra, Country Land and Business Association, National Farmers Union Project Research Manager: Aletta Bonn Moors for the Future Castleton Visitor Centre Buxton Road Castleton Derbyshire S33 8WP Tel/Fax: 01433 621656 email: [email protected] website: www.moorsforthefuture.org.uk 2004 Peak District Moorland Breeding Bird Survey 1 CONTENTS page SUMMARY 5 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. THE STUDY SITE 7 3. THE PHYSICAL BACKGROUND 9 4. VEGETATION AND BIRD ASSOCIATIONS 10 5. METHODOLOGY 12 5.1 Bird survey census 12 5.2 Accuracy of survey methods 14 5.3 Accuracy of GIS records 15 5.4 Data Storage 15 6. RESULTS 17 6.1. Introduction 17 6.2 Species Accounts 18 6.3 Summary Statistics 41 7. DISCUSSION 44 7.1 National and international importance of breeding populations 44 in the Peak District 7.2 Long-term change in distribution and abundance of selected species 44 8. CONCLUSIONS 50 9. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 50 10. REFERENCES 51 MAPS APPENDIX 2 2004 Peak District Moorland Breeding Bird Survey LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Distribution of Red Grouse across surveyed habitats Figure 2: Distribution of Golden Plover across surveyed habitats Figure 3: Distribution
    [Show full text]
  • The Field Identification of North American Pipits Ben King Illustrated by Peter Hayman and Pieter Prall
    The field identification of North American pipits Ben King Illustrated by Peter Hayman and Pieter Prall LTHOUGHTHEWATER PIPIT (Anthus ground in open country. However, the in this paper. inoletta) and the Sprague's Pipit two speciesof tree-pipits use trees for (Antbus spragueit)are fairly easy to rec- singing and refuge and are often in NCEABIRD HAS been recognized asa ogmze using the current popular field wooded areas. pipit, the first thing to checkis the guides, the five species more recently All the pipits discussedin the paper, ground color of the back. Is it brown added to the North American list are except perhaps the Sprague's, move (what shade?), olive, or gray? Then note more difficult to identify and sometimes their tails in a peculiarpumping motion, the black streaks on the back. Are they present a real field challenge. The field down and then up. Some species broad or narrow, sharply or vaguely de- •dentffication of these latter specieshas "pump" their tails more than others. fined, conspicuousor faint? How exten- not yet been adequatelydealt with in the This tail motion is often referred to as sive are they? Then check for pale North American literature. However, "wagging." While the term "wag" does streaks on the back. Are there none, much field work on the identification of include up and down motion as well as two, four, many? What color are they-- pipits has been done in the last few side to side movement, it is better to use whitish, buff, brownish buff? Are they years, especially in Alaska and the the more specificterm "pump" which is conspicuousor faint? Discerningthese Urnted Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 Passerines If You Want to Increase Passerine 1 Birds on Your Moor, This Fact Sheet Helps You Understand Their Habitat and Diet Requirements
    BD1228 Determining Environmentally Sustainable and Economically Viable Grazing Systems for the Restoration and Maintenance of Heather Moorland in England and Wales 4.3 Passerines If you want to increase passerine 1 birds on your moor, this fact sheet helps you understand their habitat and diet requirements. The species covered are the commoner moorland passerines that breed in England and Wales: • Meadow pipit • Skylark • Stonechat • Whinchat • Wheatear • Ring ouzel Broad habitat relationships The study examined detailed abundance relationships for the first five species and coarser presence/absence relationships for the last one above. Several other passerine species breed on moorland, from the widespread wren to the rare and highly localised twite, but these were not included in the study. Meadow pipit and skylark occur widely on moorlands, with the ubiquitous meadow pipit being the most abundant moorland bird. Wheatear, whinchat and stonechat are more restricted in where they are found. They tend to be most abundant at lower altitudes and sometimes on relatively steep ground. Wheatears are often associated with old sheepfolds and stone walls that are often used as nesting sites. The increasingly rare ring ouzel is restricted to steep sided valleys and gullies on moorland, often where crags and scree occur. They are found breeding from the lower ground on moorland, up to altitudes of over 800 m. Biodiversity value & status Of the moorland passerine species considered in this study: • Skylark and ring ouzel are red listed in the UK’s Birds of Conservation Concern • Meadow pipit and stonechat are amber listed in the UK’s Birds of Conservation Concern 1 Passerines are songbirds that perch 1 4.3 Passerines • Skylark is on both the England and Welsh Section 74 lists of the Countryside and Rights of Way Act of species the conservation of which will be promoted by the Governments [Note: Skylarks are red listed because of declines on lowland farmland largely, and stonechats are amber listed because of an unfavourable conservation status in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Cotswold Water Park Species Check List
    Your local charity working for Record your Wildlife Sightings! wildlife and people Collecting biological records can provide us with important information about species and habitat distribution and abundance within the Cotswold Water Park. This information is made available to local planning authorities and conservation organisations and can help them to make decisions about future management. By submitting your sightings you can help to safeguard your local wildlife! So if you are spending time out and about in the Cotswold Water Park we would like to hear CotswoldCotswold WaterWater ParkPark about what you have seen! You can use the form below to record your data. Please include the species (common name is fine) and the location (such as lake number, reserve name or 6 figure SpeciesSpecies CheckCheck ListList grid reference if known). The completed form can then be posted to us at: Cotswold Water Park Trust, Manor Farm, Down Ampney, Cirencester, GL7 5QF We look forward to hearing from you soon! Species Location Date Comments Name:............................................................................................................................................ E-mail:........................................................................................................................................... Telephone:...................................................................................................................................... www.waterpark.org 01793 752730 Rachel Budworth Version Number: 03 December 2012
    [Show full text]
  • Migratory Birds of Ladakh a Brief Long Distance Continental Migration
    WORLD'S MIGRATORY BIRDS DAY 08 MAY, 2021 B R O W N H E A D E D G U L L MIGRATORY BIRDS OF LADAKH A BRIEF LONG DISTANCE CONTINENTAL MIGRATION the Arctic Ocean and the Indian Ocean, and comprises several migration routes of waterbirds. It also touches “West Asian- East African Flyway”. Presence of number of high-altitude wetlands (>2500 m amsl altitude) with thin human population makes Ladakh a suitable habitat for migration and breeding of continental birds, including wetlands of very big size (e.g., Pangong Tso, Tso Moriri, Tso Kar, etc.). C O M M O N S A N D P I P E R Ladakh provides a vast habitat for the water birds through its complex Ladakh landscape has significance network of wetlands including two being located at the conjunction of most important wetlands (Tso Moriri, four zoogeographic zones of the world Tso Kar) which have been designated (Palearctic, Oriental, Sino-Japanese and as Ramsar sites. Sahara-Arabian). In India, Ladakh landscape falls in Trans-Himalayan Nearly 89 bird species (long distance biogeographic zone and two provinces migrants) either breed or roost in (Ladakh Mountains, 1A) and (Tibetan Ladakh, and most of them (59) are Plateau, 1B). “Summer Migrants”, those have their breeding grounds here. Trans-Himalayan Ladakh is an integral part of the "Central Asian Flyway" of migratory birds which a large part of the globe (Asia and Europe) between Ladakh also hosts 25 bird species, during their migration along the Central Asian Flyway, as “Passage Migrants” which roost in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]