DOCSLIB.ORG

26 May 2012 National Assembly Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REPORT ON THE LESOTHO 26 MAY 2012 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS 2012 ii NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS REPORT 2012 Independent Electoral Commission Lesotho iii Published by the Independent Electoral Commission of Lesotho IEC Head Office 2nd and 3rd Floor MGC Park Corner Pope John Paul II & Mpilo Boulevard Maseru 100, Lesotho P. O. Box 12698 Maseru 100, Lesotho Tel: +266 2231 4991 Fax: +266 2231 0398 Website: www.iec.org.ls © IEC LESOTHO 2013 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. Design and Layout: IEC Lesotho 2012 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS REPORT iv Table of Contents 1. Foreword ......................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Table 1: List of Political Parties which Participated on 2012 Elections ............................................. 3 Chart 1: Political Parties Representatives at the Constituencies ........................................................ 4 3. Legal Framework ............................................................................................................................ 6 4. Delimitation of Constituency Boundaries ....................................................................................... 8 5. Dissolution of Parliament................................................................................................................ 9 6. Election Timetable ........................................................................................................................ 10 7. Registration ................................................................................................................................... 12 8. Nomination of Candidates ............................................................................................................ 16 9. Civic and Voter Education ............................................................................................................ 17 10. Infrastructure and Logistics .......................................................................................................... 22 11. Voters Transfers and Demarcation Statistics ................................................................................ 23 12. Election Observation and Monitoring ........................................................................................... 26 13. Advance Voting and Voting Day .................................................................................................. 27 14. Constituency Results ..................................................................................................................... 29 14.1 Performance of All Parties in Regard to Number of Votes ................................................... 29 1 1. Foreword On 26th May 2012, the people of Lesotho were asked to vote for the establishment of the 8th Parliament of Lesotho. This report is an account of how the National Assembly Elections were run and challenges encountered. It also gives an outline of the electoral process from demarcation of electoral boundaries, registration of voters and political parties, nomination of candidates and voting. Elections provide a foundation for a stable democracy that Lesotho has started to experience. 2012 National Assembly Elections has been the fourth in a series of elections run by the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC). Each election has its own challenges but the 2012 election more than any other elections run by IEC in the past was different in that it demonstrated a level of trust on the electoral administration process that resulted in the acceptance of the election results; which then has allowed an orderly transition of power. Observers both international and local have highlighted that the 26 May 2012 general election process was transparent, peaceful, free, fair and participatory. Furthermore the observer missions have acclaimed and congratulated the people of the Kingdom of Lesotho, political parties and candidates for their political maturity and for demonstrating faith in the principles of democracy. All this makes everyone involved in this election to take pride. There have been new amendments in the National Assembly Electoral Act, 2011 which were aimed to improve the administration of the election processes but it has been noted that more refinements still have to be done on the Act. The Commission look forward to working with all of those who have a responsibility for ensuring the successful delivery of these elections. _____________________________ _____________________ ___________ Dr. Fako Likoti Adv. ’Mamosebi Pholo Chairman Commissioner Independent Electoral Commission Independent Electoral Commission ________________________________ Mr. Mphasa Mokhochane Director of Elections Independent Electoral Commission 2 2. Introduction The Independent Electoral Commission (IEC) is a constitutional Election Management Body (EMB) that is established by the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution of Lesotho. The powers and duties of the Commission are prescribed in Section 135 of the National Assembly Electoral Act. This is a body which is bestowed with, among others as stated in the Constitution, the holding of parliamentarian, local government elections and referenda. In accordance with its mandate, the Independent Electoral Commission held the 4th National Assembly Elections on 26th May 2012, which this report is all about. Preparations leading to the holding of these elections started well in advance, and followed the Local Government Elections that was held only in October 2011. As it is inevitable some activities which were geared towards the holding of the Local Government Elections had a direct bearing on the National Assembly Elections. These would include the registration of voters, their transfers, removal of the deceased and other activities that contributed to clean and reliable voters’ register. The purpose of this report is to present an account of how the general elections were run and challenges encountered. It also gives the legal outline within which the elections were held, a broad outline of the electoral process from demarcation of electoral boundaries, registration of voters and political parties, nomination of candidates and voting. Finally it gives an overview of the conduct of the 2012 National Assembly Elections as a learning curve for the future holding of elections. About 18 political parties registered for and contested the aforesaid elections and these were: Table 1: List of Political Parties which Participated on 2012 Elections PARTY ABBREVIATION FULL NAME ABC ALL BASOTHO CONVENTION ACFD AREKA COVANENT FRONT FOR DEVELOPMENT ADC ALL DEMOCRATIC CORPORATION AUM AFRICAN UNITY MOVEMENT BBDP BASOTHO BATHO DEMOCRATIC PARTY BCP BASOTHO CONGRESS PARTY BDNP BASOTHO DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL PARTY BNP BASOTHO NATIONAL PARTY DC DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS 3 LCD LESOTHO CONGRESS FOR DEMOCRACY LMM LEKHOTLA LA MEKHOA LE MEETLO LPC LESOTHO PEOPLES CONGRESS LWP LESOTHO WORKERS PARTY MFP MAREMATLOU FREEDOM PARTY NIP NATIONAL INDEPENDENT PARTY PFD POPULAR FRONT FOR DEMOCRACY SSD LEKHOTLA LA SENKATANA WHP WHITEHORSE PARTY On the other hand Chart 1 here below shows how the parties have posted their candidates/representatives throughout the country. Chart 1: Political Parties Representatives at the Constituencies The election s were run by the 4th Commission which was composed of Mrs Limakatso Mokhothu who was the chairperson of the commission, Commissioners Dr. Fako Likoti and Mr Malefetsane Nkhahle, who, regrettable passed away a few months before the elections. MAY HIS SOUL REST IN PEACE. The electoral process and supervision of electoral staff was garnered by the ably supervision of Acting Director of Elections, Mr Mphasa Mokhochane. 1.1 Gender Representation Even though Lesotho is said to be amongst the top 10 countries in the world that have made significance progress in gender equality and empowerment of women,1 this does not seen to be the case when it comes to politics. In 2012 national elections there were 1 http://www.undp.org.ls Millennium Development goals Report – Lesotho – 2011. 4 very few women candidates contesting constituency seats.2 Chart 2 here-below shows the number of women who won the 2012 national elections as compared to that of men. Chart 2 Gender Analysis On Winning Parties In Constituencies 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 Number of Candidates Number 5 0 ABC DC LCD PFD Male 23 34 9 1 Female 3 7 3 0 In order to address this worrying state of affairs, the Commission, in 2011 when reviewing the National Assembly Electoral Act 1992, came up with a provision that mandated political parties to prepare their proportional representation (PR) list in a manner that the list shall not only include equal number of women and men but shall also ensure that if the first candidate is a male he shall immediately be followed by a female candidate and vis-versa (Zebra model). This provisions made a significance difference in the 8th Parliament as the number of women has increased than ever before. 2 SADC Parliamentary Forum – Election Observation Mission report, for the 2012 Lesotho National assembly elections, August, 2012. 5 3. Legal Framework
Recommended publications
  • The Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences Quota Report Series

    The Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences Quota Report Series

    The Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences Quota Report Series Edited by Julie Ballington In Collaboration with This report was compiled from the findings and case studies presented at an International IDEA, EISA and SADC Parliamentary Forum Workshop held on 11–12 November 2004, Pretoria, South Africa. © International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2004 This is an International IDEA publication. International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. Applications for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: Information Unit International IDEA SE -103 34 Stockholm Sweden International IDEA encourages dissemination of its work and will promptly respond to requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications. Graphic design by: Magnus Alkmar Cover photos: Anoli Perera, Sri Lanka Printed by: Trydells Tryckeri AB, Sweden ISBN: 91-85391-17-4 Preface The International Institute for Democracy and a global research project on the implementation and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), an intergovernmental use of quotas worldwide in cooperation with the organization with member states across all continents, Department of Political Science, Stockholm University. seeks to support sustainable democracy in both new By comparing the employment of gender quotas in dif- and long-established democracies. Drawing on com- ferent political contexts this project seeks to gauge parative analysis and experience, IDEA works to bolster whether, and under what conditions, quotas can be electoral processes, enhance political equality and par- implemented successfully. It also aims to raise general ticipation and develop democratic institutions and awareness of the use of gender quotas as an instrument practices.
  • No. 21: the State of Poverty and Food Insecurity in Maseru, Lesotho

    No. 21: the State of Poverty and Food Insecurity in Maseru, Lesotho

    Wilfrid Laurier University Scholars Commons @ Laurier African Food Security Urban Network Reports and Papers 2015 No. 21: The State of Poverty and Food Insecurity in Maseru, Lesotho Resetselemang Leduka Jonathan Crush Balsillie School of International Affairs/WLU, [email protected] Bruce Frayne Southern African Migration Programme Cameron McCordic Balsillie School of International Affairs/WLU Thope Matobo See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/afsun Part of the Food Studies Commons, Political Science Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Leduka, R., Crush, J., Frayne, B., McCordic, C., Matobo, T., Makoa, T., Mphale, M., Phaila, M., Letsie, M. (2015). The State of Poverty and Food Insecurity in Maseru, Lesotho (rep., pp. i-80). Kingston, ON and Cape Town: African Food Security Urban Network. Urban Food Security Series No. 21. This AFSUN Urban Food Security Series is brought to you for free and open access by the Reports and Papers at Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in African Food Security Urban Network by an authorized administrator of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Resetselemang Leduka, Jonathan Crush, Bruce Frayne, Cameron McCordic, Thope Matobo, Ts’episo Makoa, Matseliso Mphale, Mmantai Phaila, and Moipone Letsie This afsun urban food security series is available at Scholars Commons @ Laurier: https://scholars.wlu.ca/afsun/11 AFRICAN FOOD SECURITY URBAN NETWORK (AFSUN) THE STATE OF POVERTY AND FOOD INSECURITY IN MASERU, LESOTHO URBAN FOOD SECURITY SERIES NO. 21 AFRICAN FOOD SECURITY URBAN NETWORK (AFSUN) THE STATE OF POVERTY AND FOOD INSECURITY IN MASERU, LESOTHO RESETSELEMANG LEDUKA, JONATHAN CRUSH, BRUCE FRAYNE, CAMERON MCCORDIC, THOPE MATOBO, TS’EPISO E.
  • Lesotho's Technology Needs Assessment

    Lesotho's Technology Needs Assessment

    Lesotho Meteorological Services Ministry of Natural Resources ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE TECHNOLOGY NEEDS IN LESOTHO Energy and Land Use Change and Forestry TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE i LIST OF ACRONYMS ii LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVIEWED iii I. BACKGROUND 1 Socio-economic conditions 1 National development objectives 1 Poverty alleviation 1 Employment creation 1 Social integration 2 Conservation of the land base 2 The future path of development 4 The role of science and technology in development 4 Agro-climatic conditions 5 Climate change scenarios 5 The draft technology development policy 6 International and regional perspectives 7 II. NATIONAL EXPERIENCES 10 Introduction 10 Agricultural research 10 Appropriate technology research 11 Labour-intensive construction 12 Rural water supplies 13 The rural sanitation programme 13 Low-cost housing development 14 Other initiatives 14 Technology registration 15 Technology transfer mechanisms 15 Shows, fairs and exhibitions 15 Extension services 15 Radio and other services 16 III. TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING 17 Introduction 17 Current education and training policies 17 Curriculum development 18 School programmes 20 Technical and vocational training 21 University and other tertiary training 22 Other related initiatives 23 Industrial training and support 23 Small contractor training 24 Skills training 24 Trades testing 24 IV. TECHNOLOGY NEEDS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR 26 Introduction 26 Challenging issues 28 Sector Institutions 29 Overall policies and strategies 30 Options for Technology Transfer in the Sector 32 Renewable energy technologies 32 Hydro-power development 33 Solar photovoltaic technologies 34 Solar thermal technologies 34 Wind energy 35 Biogas technology 35 Energy Conservation 36 Energy efficiency/conservation in the residential sector 36 Energy efficiency/conservation in commerce and industry 36 Energy efficiency/conservation in the transport sector 37 Energy efficiency/conservation in government buildings 37 Passive solar design in buildings 37 Energy efficient cooking devices/stoves 37 Energy auditing 38 V.
  • Likoti, Injodemar 3

    Likoti, Injodemar 3

    International Journal of Development and Management Review (INJODEMAR) Vol. 3 No. 1 May, 2008 215 THE CHALLENGES OF PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY IN LESOTHO: 1993-2007 LIKOTI, FAKO JOHNSON Department of Politics and Administrative Studies National University of Lesotho [email protected] Abstract Lesotho got its independence from Britain in 1960. The country experienced a coup in January 1970 while it was still fresh from colonial rule. During this period, the country's political parties were fragile and parliamentarians (MPs) were yet to acclimatise themselves with their parliamentary responsibilities. From 1970-1992, the country did not have a democratically elected parliament. It was not until early 1993 that the dawn of democracy came to Lesotho. This meant that MPs were still inexperienced and the National parliament appeared to have been confronted with myriads of challenges. This paper argues that these challenges have not only undermined the parliament but have also impacted negatively on the legitimacy and accountability of parliament. It further opines that parliamentarians in any democracy are held in high regard by the electorate and have to conduct themselves with due diligence. As MPs, they are expected to conduct themselves in parliament in a manner befitting their public status. Key Words: Democratisation, Unparliamentary practices, Opposition parties, Legislative power, Lesotho. Introduction Lesotho is a Constitutional democracy. This means that the country subscribes to constitutional rule. The concept of constitutionalism limits the arbitrariness of political power. While the concept recognises the necessity of government, it also insists upon limitations placed upon its powers. In essence, constitutionalism is an antithesis of arbitrary rule.
  • Lesotho Vulnerability Assessment Committee

    Lesotho Vulnerability Assessment Committee

    2016 Lesotho Government Lesotho VAC Table of Contents List of Tables ................................LESOTHO................................................................ VULNERABILITY.............................................................................. 0 List of Maps ................................................................................................................................................................................ 0 Acknowledgments ................................ASSESSMENT................................................................ COMMITTEE................................................................ ... 3 Key Findings .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 INTERVENTION MODALITY SELECTION Section 1: Objectives, methodology and limitations ................................................................................................. 7 1.1 Objectives ................................In light ................................of the findings................................ from the LVAC................................ Market Assessment................................ that assessed....... 9 the functionality and performance of Lesotho’s food markets, LVAC proceeded to 1.2 Methodology
  • The Impact of Political Parties and Party Politics On

    The Impact of Political Parties and Party Politics On

    EXPLORING THE ROLE OF POLITICAL PARTIES AND PARTY SYSTEMS ON DEMOCRACY IN LESOTHO by MPHO RAKHARE Student number: 2009083300 Submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the Magister Degree in Governance and Political Transformation in the Programme of Governance and Political Transformation at the University of Free State Bloemfontein February 2019 Supervisor: Dr Tania Coetzee TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 List of abbreviations and acronyms ................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................................... 9 Introduction to research ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.1 Motivation ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Problem statement .....................................................................................................................
  • 2020 09 30 USG Southern Africa Fact Sheet #3

    2020 09 30 USG Southern Africa Fact Sheet #3

    Fact Sheet #3 Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Southern Africa – Regional Disasters SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 SITUATION AT A GLANCE 10.5 765,000 5.4 1.7 320,000 MILLION MILLION MILLION Estimated Food- Estimated Confirmed Estimated Food-Insecure Estimated Severely Estimated Number Insecure Population in COVID-19 Cases in Population in Rural Food-Insecure of IDPs in Southern Africa Southern Africa Zimbabwe Population in Malawi Cabo Delgado IPC – Sept. 2020 WHO – Sept. 30, 2020 ZimVAC – Sept. 2020 IPC – Sept. 2020 WFP – Sept. 2020 Increasing prevalence of droughts, flooding, and other climatic shocks has decreased food production in Southern Africa, extending the agricultural lean season and exacerbating existing humanitarian needs. The COVID-19 pandemic and related containment measures have worsened food insecurity and disrupted livelihoods for urban and rural households. USG partners delivered life-saving food, health, nutrition, protection, shelter, and WASH assistance to vulnerable populations in eight Southern African countries during FY 2020. TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT HUMANITARIAN FUNDING USAID/BHA1,2 $202,836,889 For the Southern Africa Response in FY 2020 State/PRM3 $19,681,453 For complete funding breakdown with partners, see detailed chart on page 6 Total $222,518,3424 1USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (USAID/BHA) 2 Total USAID/BHA funding includes non-food humanitarian assistance from the former Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) and emergency food assistance from the former Office of Food for Peace (USAID/FFP). 3 U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (State/PRM) 4 This total includes approximately $30,914,447 in supplemental funding through USAID/BHA and State/PRM for COVID-19 preparedness and response activities.
  • LESOTHO SITUATION REPORT - June 2016

    LESOTHO SITUATION REPORT - June 2016

    UNICEF LESOTHO SITUATION REPORT - June 2016 Lesotho Humanitarian Situation Report June 2016 ©UNICEF/Lesotho/2015 Situation in Numbers Highlights UNICEF provided support for the completed Lesotho Vulnerability 310,015 Assessment Committee (LVAC), which revised the number of people Children affected requiring humanitarian assistance from 725,000+ down to 679,437. UNICEF is reaching 69,000 of the most vulnerable children (51% girls), through its Cash Grant Top Up response, which provides relief 64,141 for families in response to the food price shock during the winter Children under 5 affected months. The rapid assessment of schools indicates that 30% of schools are in need of immediate water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) 69,000 support. This means there is insufficient water for over 100,000 Vulnerable children in need of social children in all districts. Poor WASH services in schools have shown safety nets to result in low attendance and high drop-out rates. UNICEF’s WASH interventions are progressing in Mohale’s Hoek (the most drought stricken district) with 7 community tanks installed in the 534,508 most vulnerable communities. These communities will receive water People currently at risk of food tankering services, reaching an estimated 5,000 people (55% female; insecurity 41% children). During the first week of July, construction/re-habilitation will begin on community water supply schemes in Berea, Botha Buthe and 679,437 Mohale’s Hoek. This will benefit 15 most vulnerable communities, reaching 23,809 people (56% female; 45% are children). People in need of humanitarian Water purification and WASH messaging are being undertaken in assistance (LVAC) Mokhotlong and Thaba Tseka reaching 80,000 people (52% female; *All numbers above are from the Rapid Drought 49% children), starting the first week of July.
  • Integrated Acute Food Insecurity Phase Classification

    Integrated Acute Food Insecurity Phase Classification

    INTEGRATED ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY PHASE CLASSIFICATION MAY 16/MAR 17 THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO IPC analysis conducted from 24 to 30 May 2016 for all 10 districts of Lesotho based on primary data collected by LVAC and partners in May 2016 and secondary data collected from Jan. 2016 onwards. Projected analysis requires an update in October 2016. AGGREGATE NUMBERS FOR WORST PERIOD KEY FOOD INSECURITY OUTCOMES AS OF MAY 2016 – JULY TO OCTOBER 2016 – Despite current analysis corresponding to harvest/post-harvest Proportions of households and number of people in need of urgent period, 19% of households had poor food consumption, and 45% had support to protect their livelihoods and reduce food gaps and classified borderline food consumption. using IPC1: In Berea, Mafeteng, Mohale’s Hoek, Quthing and Thaba-Tseka, over Thaba-Tseka 40% (48,903 people) 20% of the rural households spent more than 75% of their cash in Maseru 25% (55,623 people) food purchase. In other districts the same expenditure pattern is Mafeteng 45% (67,204 people) experienced by 10-16% of rural households. Qacha’s Nek 45% (23,950 people) Generally, 13% of households engaged in crisis and emergency Leribe 35% (86,918 people) livelihood coping strategies, indicating that households reduced food Mohale’s Hoek 33% (50,245 people) consumption rather than depleting livelihood assets Quthing 43% (48,448 people) Global Acute Malnutrition was below 5% in all districts except in Mokhotlong 25% (23,625 people) Mohale’s Hoek, which had a GAM prevalence of 6.6%. Butha Buthe 20% (16,616 people) Berea 51% (88,725 people) Total Approx.
  • Lesotho 2019 Human Rights Report

    Lesotho 2019 Human Rights Report

    LESOTHO 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lesotho is a constitutional monarchy with a democratic parliamentary government. Under the constitution the king is head of state but does not actively participate in political activities. The prime minister is head of government and has executive authority. In 2017 former prime minister Pakalitha Mosisili of the Democratic Congress Party lost a vote of no confidence and a snap election. All major parties accepted the outcome, and Motsoahae Thomas Thabane of the All Basotho Convention Party (ABC) formed a coalition government and became prime minister. Mosisili transferred power peacefully to Thabane, and Mathibeli Mokhothu assumed leadership of the opposition. Local and international observers assessed the election as peaceful, credible, and transparent. The security forces consist of the Lesotho Defense Force (LDF), the Lesotho Mounted Police Service (LMPS), the National Security Service (NSS), and the Lesotho Correctional Service (LCS). The LMPS is responsible for internal security. The LDF maintains external security and may support police when the LMPS commissioner requests assistance. The NSS is an intelligence service that provides information on possible threats to internal and external security. The LDF and NSS report to the minister of defense; the LMPS, to the minister of police and public safety; and the LCS, to the minister of justice and correctional service. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces. The Southern African Development Community (SADC) Preventive Mission in Lesotho contingent of troops, deployed to foster stability as the government moved forward with SADC-recommended security-sector reforms, departed the country in November 2018. In May the government did not meet an SADC deadline for completion of constitutional and security reforms.
  • Lesotho | Freedom House

    Lesotho | Freedom House

    Lesotho | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/lesotho A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 10 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 3 / 4 Lesotho is a constitutional monarchy. King Letsie III serves as the ceremonial head of state. The prime minister is head of government; the head of the majority party or coalition automatically becomes prime minister following elections, making the prime minister’s legitimacy largely dependent on the conduct of the polls. Thomas Thabane became prime minister after his All Basotho Convention (ABC) won snap elections in 2017. Thabane, a fixture in the country’s politics, had previously served as prime minister from 2012–14, but spent two years in exile in South Africa amid instability that followed a failed 2014 coup. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The lower house of Parliament, the National Assembly, has 120 seats; 80 are filled through first-past-the-post constituency votes, and the remaining 40 through proportional representation. The Senate—the upper house of Parliament—consists of 22 principal chiefs who wield considerable authority in rural areas and whose membership is hereditary, along with 11 other members appointed by the king and acting on the advice of the Council of State. Members of both chambers serve five- year terms. In 2017, the coalition government of Prime Minister Pakalitha Mosisili—head of the Democratic Congress (DC)—lost a no-confidence vote. The development triggered the third round of legislative elections held since 2012.
  • Implications for Consolidation of Democracy in Lesotho by Libuseng Malephane

    Implications for Consolidation of Democracy in Lesotho by Libuseng Malephane

    Contesting and turning over power: Implications for consolidation of democracy in Lesotho By Libuseng Malephane Afrobarometer Policy Paper No. 17 | February 2015 Introduction Since its transition to electoral democracy in 1993, Lesotho has experienced a series of upheavals related to the electoral process. Election results were vehemently contested in 1998, when the ruling Lesotho Congress for Democracy (LCD) won all but one of the country’s constituencies under a first-past-the-post electoral system, and a military intervention by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) was required to restore order. A mixed member proportional (MMP) model introduced in the run-up to the 2002 general elections resulted in more parties being represented in Parliament. The MMP model also led to the formation of informal coalitions as political parties endeavoured to maintain or increase their seats in Parliament in the 2007 elections (Kapa, 2007). Using a two-ballot system, with one ballot for constituency and another for the proportional-representation (PR) component, the elections preserved the ruling LCD’s large majority in Parliament and precipitated another protracted dispute between the ruling and opposition parties over the allocation of PR seats. Mediation efforts by the SADC and the Christian Council of Lesotho led to a review of the Constitution and Electoral Law. The resulting National Assembly Electoral Act of 2011 provides for a single-ballot system that allows voters to indicate their preferences for both constituency and PR components of the MMP system (UNDP, 2013). Meanwhile, the new All Basotho Convention (ABC), which had broken away from the LCD in 2006, became the largest opposition party in Parliament after the 2007 elections.