DOCSLIB.ORG

Eurasia Foundation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eurasia Foundation Türkiye – Ermenistan Rehberi Türkiye-Ermenistan ilişkileri hakkında çalışan kişi ve kurumlar hakkında bilgi ve iletişim detayları Eurasia Partnership Foundation ve United States Agency for International Development (USAID) desteğiyle Ağustos 2010 2 İÇİNDEKİLER Bu Rehber Hakkında .................................................................................................................. 6 2008-2010 arası Ermenistan-Türkiye ilişkilerinde kilit tarihler ................................................. 7 I. Bölüm: Ermenistan ............................................................................................................... 11 Medya ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Gazeteler: Gazeteciler/Köşe Yazarları/Editörler .................................................................. 12 Aravot ............................................................................................................................... 12 AZG (Nation) ................................................................................................................... 13 Haykakan Zhamanak (Armenian Times) ......................................................................... 14 Golos Armenii (Ermenistan‟ın Sesi) ................................................................................ 15 Hayots Ashkharh (Ermeni Dünyası) ................................................................................ 16 Televizyon: Yorumcu/Editörler ........................................................................................... 17 H1 Kamu TV .................................................................................................................... 17 Shant TV .......................................................................................................................... 18 Yerkir Media TV .............................................................................................................. 19 Ermenistan TV ................................................................................................................. 20 Kentron TV ...................................................................................................................... 21 Siyaset: Kurumlar ve Kişiler .................................................................................................... 22 Ermenistan Dışişleri Bakanlığı ............................................................................................. 22 Cumhurbaşkanlığı İdari Personeli ........................................................................................ 24 Meclis: Siyasi Partilerin Temsilcileri ................................................................................... 24 Meclis Dışı Muhalefet: Ermeni Ulusal Kongresi (Armenian National Congress) ............... 27 Sivil Toplum Kuruluşları ......................................................................................................... 28 Avrasya Ortaklık Fonu (Eurasia Partnership Foundation - EPF) ......................................... 28 Erivan Basın Kulübü (Yerevan Press Club - YPC) .............................................................. 31 Uluslararası İnsani Gelişim Merkezi (International Center for Human Development – ICHD) ................................................................................................................................... 32 Sıradışı Çatışma Çözümü Yöntem Önerileri Merkezi (Center for Proposing Non- Traditional Conflict Resolution Methods - CCPNTCRM) .................................................. 34 Ermeni Uluslararası Politika Araştırma Grubu (Armenian International Policy Research Group - AIPRG) ....................................................................................................................... 36 Kafkasya Arabuluculuk Girişimleri (Caucasus Center of Peace-Making Initiatives) ......... 37 Sivil Toplum Enstitüsü (Civil Society Institute - CSI) ........................................................ 38 Kafkasya Enstitüsü (Caucasus Institute - CI) ....................................................................... 40 Sivilitas Fonu (Civilitas Foundation) ................................................................................... 42 Küreselleşme ve Bölgesel İşbirliği Analitik Merkezi (Analytical Center on Globalization and Regional Cooperation - ACGRC) ................................................................................. 44 Ermeni Ulusal ve Uluslararası Çalışmalar Merkezi (Armenian Center for National and International Studies - ACNIS) ............................................................................................ 46 Modus Vivendi: Ara Papyan ..........................................Fehler! Textmarke nicht definiert. Ararat Merkezi (Ararat Center for Strategic Research) ....................................................... 49 Asparez Gazeteciler Kulübü (Asparez Journalists‟ Club), Gümrü ...................................... 50 Akademik Kurum ve Akademisyenler ..................................................................................... 51 Erivan Devlet Üniversitesi, Doğu Araştırmaları Fakültesi .................................................. 55 Erivan Devlet Üniversitesi, Uygarlık ve Kültürel Araştırmalar Merkezi (The Center for Civilization and Cultural Studies - CCCS) .......................................................................... 56 Ulusal Bilimler Akademisi Doğu Araştırmaları Enstitüsü (National Sciences Academy Institute of Oriental Studies) ................................................................................................ 57 Soykırım Müzesi Enstitüsü .................................................................................................. 58 Noravank Vakfı (Noravank Foundation) ............................................................................. 60 3 İşadamları ................................................................................................................................. 61 Gagik Makaryan ................................................................................................................... 61 Arsen Ghazaryan .................................................................................................................. 62 II. Bölüm: Türkiye .................................................................................................................... 63 Türk Medyasının Görünümü .................................................................................................... 64 Gazete dağıtımı .................................................................................................................... 65 Radyo ve Televizyon Üst Kurulu ......................................................................................... 66 Türkiye‟nin Önde Gelen Medya Kuruluşları ....................................................................... 66 Albayrak Medya Grubu .................................................................................................... 66 Ciner Medya Grubu .......................................................................................................... 66 Çukurova Holding ............................................................................................................ 66 Doğan Medya Grubu ........................................................................................................ 67 Doğuş Yayın Grubu ......................................................................................................... 67 Feza Gazetecilik Grubu .................................................................................................... 67 Samanyolu Yayın Grubu .................................................................................................. 67 Turkuvaz Medya Grubu ................................................................................................... 67 Haber ajansları ...................................................................................................................... 68 Anadolu Ajansı ................................................................................................................. 68 Doğan Haber Ajansı ......................................................................................................... 68 Cihan Haber Ajansı .......................................................................................................... 68 İhlas Haber Ajansı ............................................................................................................ 68 Dicle Haber Ajansı (DIHA) ............................................................................................. 68 Türkçe dışındaki dillerde yayın yapan gazeteler ve azınlık basını ....................................... 69 Azadiya Welat (Kürtçe) ................................................................................................... 69 Apoyevmatini (Yunanca) ................................................................................................. 69 Iho (Yunanca) ................................................................................................................... 69 Şalom (Türkçe – Judeo-İspanyol) .................................................................................... 69 Hürriyet Daily News – Today‟s Zaman ........................................................................... 70 Ermeni gazeteleri .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Haber Değeri Kavraminin Değişmesi Sürecinde Basin
    T.C. İSTANBUL ÜN İVERS İTES İ SOSYAL B İLİMLER ENST İTÜSÜ RADYO-TELEV İZYON-SİNEMA ANA B İLİM DALI Yüksek Lisans Tezi HABER DE ĞER İ KAVRAMININ DE ĞİŞ MES İ SÜREC İNDE BASIN KURULU ŞLARI MÜLK İYET İNİN ETK İSİ Nur Esra Atmaca 2501050494 Tez Danı şmanı Doç.Dr. Ne şe KARS İstanbul 2009 HABER DE ĞER İ KAVRAMININ DE ĞİŞ MES İ SÜREC İNDE BASIN KURULU ŞLARI MÜLK İYET İNİN ETK İSİ Nur Esra Atmaca ÖZ Çe şitlenen ileti şim araçlarının medya holdinglerine dönü şmesi ve bunların sahiplerinin medya dı şında ticari faaliyetler yürütmesi haberi ticari bir meta haline getirmi ştir. Haber kitlelere dezenforme edilerek ula şmaya ba şlamı ştır. Medya kurulu şlarının sınırlı etkileri olsaydı onlarca medya kurulu şunun sadece bir kaç ki şinin kontrolünde olması yani medyanın tekelle şmesi bir sorun olarak görülmezdi. Dünyanın her yerinde belli ba şlı medya organlarının yine belli ba şlı holdinglerce yönetilmesi insanlara ula ştırılan “haber”in güvenilirli ği üzerinde ciddi endi şelere neden olmaktadır. Tezimizde kitle ileti şim araçlarının yarattı ğı etki medya mülkiyeti sürecinde ele alındı. ABSTRACT Disscussing ownership of media how efects news is the question we ask and search for an answer. If the media have limited efects, as some argue, then the fact that a small number of people control the media is relatively unimportant. We will see in our thesis that how media ownership becomes a very significant matter. We feel the media must have must have profound efects on news and in our theses, we study this. 2 HABER DE ĞER İ KAVRAMININ DE ĞİŞ MES İ SÜREC İNDE BASIN KURULU ŞLARI MÜLK İYET İNİN ETK İSİ ÖZ-ABSTRACT.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Muhafazakâr Basinda Hegemonya Uğraklari: 12 Eylül 2010 Referandumu Ve Yeni Anayasa Tartişmalari
    MUHAFAZAKÂR BASINDA HEGEMONYA UĞRAKLARI: 12 EYLÜL 2010 REFERANDUMU VE YENİ ANAYASA TARTIŞMALARI Çağdaş CEYHAN DOKTORA TEZİ Basın Yayın Anabilim Dalı Danışman: Prof. Dr. Nejdet ATABEK Eskişehir Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Kasım, 2014 ii Doktora Tez Özü MUHAFAZAKÂR BASINDA HEGEMONYA UĞRAKLARI: 12 EYLÜL 2010 REFERANDUMU VE YENİ ANAYASA TARTIŞMALARI Çağdaş CEYHAN Basın Yayın Anabilim Dalı Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kasım 2014 Danışman: Prof. Dr. Nejdet ATABEK Muhafazakârlık üzerine tartışmalar Cumhuriyetin kuruluşundan beri yapılmaktadır. Kendini muhafazakâr demokrat bir parti olarak tanımlayan AKP’nin 2002 yılında iktidara gelmesiyle beraber sosyal bilimlere ait disiplinlerde bir araştırma nesnesi olarak muhafazakârlığa olan ilgi artmıştır. Bu çalışma muhafazakâr söylemin muhafazakâr gazetelerin köşe yazarlarınca nasıl kurulduğuna odaklanmıştır. Bunu yaparken Laclau ve Mouffe’un Gramsci’nin hegemonya kavramını radikalleştirerek kullandıkları ve ucu açık bir süreç olarak ele aldıkları şekliyle hegemonya kavramını kullanmıştır. Muhafazakâr hegemonya bir oluş ve eklemlenme ilişkileri pratiği içinde ele alınıştır. Çalışma bu yönüyle muhafazakâr hegemonyaya alternatif bir bakış açısı geliştirmeye çalışmıştır. Çalışma iki temel uğrak üzerinden yapılandırılmıştır. İlkin, muhafazakâr hegemonyanın bütünüyle tesis edildiği bir tarihsel moment olan 12 Eylül 2010 Referandumu incelenmiştir. 1 Eylül ve 20 Eylül 2010 tarihleri arasında Yeni Şafak ve Zaman gazetelerinin köşe yazarları incelenmiştir. İkinci bir tarihsel
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasia Foundation, OSI, the Council of Europe, the Heinrich Boll Foundation, As Well As Regional Embassies of EU Countries
    Turkey – Armenia Manual Information and contacts to persons and institutions working on Turkey-Armenia relations Supported by the Eurasia Partnership Foundation and the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) August 2010 Index About this Manual ............................................................................................................................ 6 Key dates in Armenia-Turkey relations 2008-2010 ......................................................................... 7 Part 1: Basic Facts about Armenia ................................................................................................. 11 Media .............................................................................................................................................. 12 Newspapers: Journalists/Columnists/Editors ............................................................................. 12 Aravot ..................................................................................................................................... 12 AZG (Nation) .......................................................................................................................... 13 Haykakan Zhamanak (Armenian Times) ................................................................................ 14 Golos Armenii (Voice of Armenia) ........................................................................................ 15 Hayots Ashkharh (Armenian World) .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BPC 150502 PG3 C National Security White Paper.Indd
    New Turkey or New Government? The June 2015 Parliamentary Election June 2015 Task Force Co-Chairs Ambassador Morton Abramowitz Ambassador Eric Edelman Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Task Force Members Henri Barkey Aaron Lobel Bernard L. and Bertha F. Cohen Founder and President, America Abroad Media Professor of Internal Relations, Lehigh University Alan Makovsky Svante Cornell Former Senior Professional Staff Member, Research Director, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and House Foreign Affairs Committee Silk Road Studies Program Admiral (ret.) Gregory Johnson Ambassador Paula Dobriansky Former Commander of U.S. Naval Forces, Europe; Former Under Secretary of State for Global Affairs Senior Advisor, Bipartisan Policy Center John Hannah General (ret.) Charles Wald Former Assistant for National Security Affairs to the Vice President Former Deputy Commander, U.S. European Command; Bipartisan Policy Center Board Member Halil Karaveli Senior Fellow, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program David Kramer Senior Director for Human Rights and Human Freedoms, McCain Institute for International Leadership National Security Program Staff Blaise Misztal Jessica Michek Project Director Project Assistant 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report would not have been possible without the substantive contributions of Barın Kayaoğlu. We also gratefully acknowledge the assistance of BPC intern Seyma Akyol. DISCLAIMER This report is a product of BPC’s National Security Program. The findings expressed herein are those solely of the National Security Program, though no member may be satisfied with every formulation in the report. The report does not necessarily represent the views or opinions of BPC, its founders, or its board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Türk Medyasinin Sermaye Yapisi Ve Siyasal Iktidarla Ilişkisi Üzerine Bir Inceleme
    Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Yıl 5, Sayı 1, Haziran 2012 (1-21) TÜRK MEDYASININ SERMAYE YAPISI VE SİYASAL İKTİDARLA İLİŞKİSİ ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME Onur DURSUN* Öz Kitle iletişim araçları, ekonomik ve politik güçler arasındaki çeşitli ilişkileri nedeniyle gerçekleri ifade etmede yetersiz kalabilmektedir. Haberi yorumlayarak yazma düşüncesi, Birinci Dünya Savaşından bu yana kabul edilmiş bir yöntemdir. Hatta köşe yazarlığının gelişmesinin temel gerekçelerinden birisidir. Okuru doğru bilgilendirme ilkesi doğrultusunda hareket edildiği sürece, haberi kurgulayan muhabir yorum dahi olsa habere müdahale etme hakkına sahiptir. Fakat hegemonik güçlerin beklentilerine yönelik kurgulanan metinlerde gerçekler doğrudan ifade edilememekte/edilmemektedir. Bu tür haber metinlerinde hegemonik güç eleştirileri ya kısmen vardır ya da yokluk düzeyindedir. Aynı tutum diğer haber metinleri için de geçerli olabilmektedir. Yani her türlü haber metni, bir şekilde söylem kısıtlamasıyla, oto-sansürle karşı karşıya kalabilmektedir. Özellikle liberal medyada, bu tavır kendisini hissettirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, sermaye yapılarının ve siyasi merkezlerin medyanın içeriğini etkilediği düşüncesiyle, Türkiye'deki medya organizasyonlarının sermaye yapıları ve siyasetle olan bağlantılarına dair, veriler doğrultusunda bir inceleme gerçekleştirilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Medyanın Sermaye Yapısı, Söylem Sınırlılığı, Medyada Tekelleşme, İleti Seçimi, Haber Süzgeçleri. Analyzes on Turkish Media's Capital Structure and Its Relationship with Political Power Abstract The multidimensional relationship between economic and political powers, mass media have been inadequate to express the realities. The idea of writing news through readers' interpretation has been admitted as a method since World War I. This is the underlying rationale behind the development of column writing. If the readers are given accurate information, the journalist who designs or interprets the news, has the right to modify the news.
    [Show full text]
  • City Research Online
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Yanardağoğlu, E. (2008). The Mediation of Cultural Identities: Changing Practices and Policies in Contemporary Turkey. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City University London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/19553/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] The Mediation of Cultural Identities: Changing Practices and Policies in Contemporary Turkey Eylem Yanardağoğlu A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy City University London Department of Sociology June 2008 1 Contents Acknowledgements .................................................................................. 5 Declaration ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JULY 15: Gülenist Coup Attempt REPORT ISSUE 3, JULY 2016
    JULY 15: Gülenist coup attempt REPORT ISSUE 3, JULY 2016 Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies is an Istanbul-Ankara-based, non-profit institute which focuses on Turkey’s vibrant socio-political landscape and its reflections and wider implications both at the regional and global levels. DS Centre was founded in February 2015 as the think-tank extension of the English-language newspaper Daily Sabah, published in Turkey. DS Centre’s aim is to provide cohesive and extensive understanding on national and international affairs via reports, publications, frequent conferences, round table meetings and workshops. DS Centre endeavors the dissemination of knowledge. The centre’s events serve as a platform for prominent academics, researchers, policy-makers and experts of the subject matter to present their perspectives and analyses to ensure coherence and reliability. DS CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES Istanbul Office Barbaros Bulvarı, No:153, Cam Han, Beşiktaş Ankara Office Çetin Emeç Bulv. No:117 Balgat, Çankaya www.dailysabahcentre.com [email protected] +90 212 354 3432 facebook.com/DSCentreforPolicyStudies @ds_cfps @ds_centre www.dailysabahcentre.com © Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies. All rights reserved. Publisher Daily Sabah Centre for Policy Studies Director Pınar Kandemir Contributors Sena Alkan, Semanur Pekkendir, Nejat Başar, Madeline Zutt, Mehmet Solmaz, Batuhan Takış, Merve Baran, Fatih Şemsettin Işık Cover Ümit Oğuz Art Director Berrak Türkmen Cover photos by Reuters and AP www.dailysabahcentre.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
    [Show full text]
  • “Freedom” of the Press in Turkey: Journalist Imprisonments During the Last Decade, 2002-2012
    “FREEDOM” OF THE PRESS IN TURKEY: JOURNALIST IMPRISONMENTS DURING THE LAST DECADE, 2002-2012 By Duygu Kanver A THESIS Submitted to Michigan State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Journalism – Master of Arts 2013 ABSTRACT “FREEDOM” OF THE PRESS IN TURKEY: JOURNALIST IMPRISONMENTS DURING THE LAST DECADE, 2002-2012 By Duygu Kanver The noticeable increase in the number of imprisoned journalists in the past three years drew national and international attention to the problems of press freedom in Turkey. Arrests of distinguished reporters of Turkey’s mainstream media, along with the ongoing limitations on the freedom of Kurdish and socialist press, caused the country to be referred as “the world’s biggest prison for journalists” by the non-governmental press freedom organizations such as Reporters Without Borders and the Committee to Protect Journalists. Statements of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government authorities claiming that the imprisoned journalists are “not journalists but terrorists,” and their reluctance to amend the laws that cause hundreds of journalists to be jailed led to questioning the influence of politics on journalist imprisonments. This study explores the problems of press freedom with a focus on imprisoned journalists. Based upon in-depth interviews with journalists who were behind bars in the last decade, this study aims to answer the questions of what has changed in terms of freedom of expression in the last decade under AKP rule, for what obvious and underlying reasons the journalists are imprisoned, whether censorship has been a part of the problems of press freedom in the last decade, and how limitations on the freedom of expression affect the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Caught in the Wheels of Power: the Political Legal And
    TESEV DEMOCRATIZATION Program Medıa studıes serıes - 3 Caught in the Wheels of Power: The Political, Legal and Economic Constraints on Independent Media and Freedom of the Press in Turkey Caught in the Wheels of Power Dilek Kurban - Ceren Sözeri Authors Dilek Kurban Ceren Sözeri Bankalar Caddesi Minerva Han, No:2, Kat: 3 34420 Karaköy ‹stanbul T +90 212 292 89 03 F +90 212 292 90 46 DEMOCRATIZATION www.tesev.org.tr ISBN:978-605-5332-18-1 PROGRAM Caught in the Wheels of Power: The Political, Legal and Economic Constraints on Independent Media and Freedom of the Press in Turkey Authors: Dilek Kurban Ceren Sözeri Caught in the wheels of power: The Political, Legal and Economic Constraints on Independent Media and Freedom of the Press in Turkey Türkiye Ekonomik ve Bankalar Cad. Minerva Han Sosyal Etüdler Vakf› No: 2 Kat: 3 Turkish Economic and Karaköy 34420, İstanbul Social Studies Foundation Tel: +90 212 292 89 03 PBX Fax: +90 212 292 90 46 Demokratikleşme Program› [email protected] Democratization Program www.tesev.org.tr Authors: Publication Identity Design: Rauf Kösemen, Myra Dilek Kurban Cover Design: Banu Yılmaz Ocak, Myra Ceren Sözeri Page Layout: Gülderen Rençber Erbaş, Myra Coordination: Sibel Doğan, Myra Prepared for Publication by: Production Coordination: Nergis Korkmaz, Myra Levent Pişkin Printing Organization: Artpres Matbaacılık San. Tic. Ltd. Şti Printed by: Scala Basım, Yayım, Tanıtım San. ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. Yeşilce Mah. Girne Cad. Dalgıç Sk. No:3 4.Levent/İstanbul-Türkiye Tel: 0212 2816200 pbx Copies: 500 TESEV PUBLICATIONS ISBN 978-605-5332-18-1 Copyright © June 2012 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Government Discourses: an Inductive Analysis
    Government Information Quarterly 30 (2013) 141–153 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Government Information Quarterly journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/govinf E-government discourses: An inductive analysis Mete Yıldız ⁎,Ayşegül Saylam Hacettepe Universitesi, Beytepe Yerleşkesi, İİBF Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Bölümü, 06800 Beytepe, Ankara, Turkey article info abstract Available online 15 February 2013 This article offers a new perspective on e-government by documenting the categories of e-government discourses, and evaluating them within a public value framework. Understanding e-government discourses is significant, Keywords: since these discourses represent contested visions of e-government, and one can derive a feel for public sentiment E-government about e-government from the discourses used in the media. The findings are accumulated through an inductive Discourse analysis analysis of 85 newspaper articles, published during the year of 2010, in three top-selling, ideologically different, Public value nationally circulating Turkish newspapers. In these 85 articles, 98 discourses presented by 90 policy actors are Government reform New public management found. Five positive and four negative discourse categories and their relationships emerged from the analysis of European Union the data. The results show that, government reform efforts shaped by the New Public Management movement Turkey and Turkey's harmonization efforts with the global political system in general, and with the European Union in par- ticular, are influential in the presentation of e-government projects to the Turkish public through newspapers. © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction discourses is crucial since these discourses represent contested visions of the e-government, and competing and complementing evaluations of The provision of government information and services, and opening public value emanating from e-government applications.
    [Show full text]
  • İNSAN HAKLARI DERNEĞİ İFADE ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ 2017 İNSAN HAKLARI Necatibey Caddesi No:82/11-12 (6
    İNSAN HAKLARI DERNEĞİ İFADE ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ 2017 İNSAN HAKLARI Necatibey Caddesi No:82/11-12 (6. kat) Demirtepe/Ankara DERNEĞİ Tel/Faks: 0 (312) 230 35 67-68 69 HUMAN RIGHTS ASSOCIATION 0 (312) 230 17 07 E-mail: [email protected] - [email protected] Web: http//www.ihd.org.tr Baskı Mayıs 2017 – Ankara LotusAjans Matbaa-Tanıtım-Organizasyon Şehit Cevdet Özdemir Mh. Sokullu Cd. Perçem Sk. No: 9/A Çankaya/Ankara Tel: 0312 480 22 52 e-posta: [email protected] İNSAN HAKLARI DERNEĞİ İfade Özgürlüğü 2017 HAZIRLAYAN HÜSNÜ ÖNDÜL KATKI SUNAN ÖZTÜRK TÜRKDOĞAN Bu Kitap Norveç Büyükelçiliğinin katkılarıyla İnsan Hakları Derneği (İHD) için yayına hazırlanmıştır. Bu Kitap İHD tarafından gerçekleştirilen ve Norveç Büyükelçiliğinin desteklediği “Basın ve İfade Özgürlüğü” projesi çerçevesinde yayına hazırlanmıştır. Kitapta yer alan bilgiler Norveç Büyükelçiliği’nin görüşlerini yansıtmaz. İNSAN HAKLARI DERNEĞİ İFADE ÖZGÜRLÜĞÜ - 2017 İÇİNDEKİLER GİRİŞ .......................................................................................................................... 7 BÖLÜM I Bir İnsan Hakkı Olarak İfade Özgürlüğü Hakkı......................................................... 9 BÖLÜM II Türkiye’de İfade Özgürlüğü İle İlgili Mevzuat .......................................................... 13 BÖLÜM III İfade Özgürlüğü Ve Terör Tanımının Belirsizliği Sorunu ......................................... 17 BÖLÜM IV İfade Özgürlüğü ve Terörle Bağlantı Kuran İddianame Örnekleri ......................... 29 BÖLÜM V İnternet Hukuku ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bia Media Monitoring 2011 / July – August - September
    BİA MEDIA MONITORING 2011 / JULY – AUGUST - SEPTEMBER MURDERED JOURNALISTS Hrant Dink trial: On 25 July, Ogün Samast received a prison sentence of 22 years and ten months handed down by the Istanbul 2nd Juvenile Criminal Court for the murder of Turkish- Armenian journalist Hrant Dink, editor-in-chief of the Armenian Agos newspaper at the time. The Istanbul court decided for imprisonment of 21.5 years on charges of premeditated murder (Article 82/1 Turkish Criminal Law/ TCK) and an additional 16 months imprisonment and a monetary fine of TL 600 (€280) on charges of unlicensed possession of weapons (Law No. 6136). Samast's file had been separated from the main case file since he was under age at the time of the murder. If the Court of Appeal upholds the verdict, Samast, who has been detained for four years, will serve two thirds of his sentence in prison, i.e. ten years and eight months. The Dink family lawyers put forward at the hearing that apart from Samast there were four other suspicious people at the scene of crime when the murder was committed. Therefore, the joint attorneys demanded the court to obtain a list of all telephone numbers used in that region at the according time from the Telecommunication Communication Presidency (TİB). The demand was dismissed due to a "violation of privacy". The trial against Ogün Samast on the grounds of "membership of an illegal organization and having committed the murder within that context" was continued on 23 September before the Istanbul 2nd Juvenile High Criminal Court. Samast did not attend the hearing and his lawyer requested the recusal of the judge.
    [Show full text]