DOCSLIB.ORG

Blair%S Eu+Turn

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Blair%S Eu+Turn CENTRE FOR POLICY STUDIES BLAIR’S EU-TURN A CASE STUDY IN BBC PARTIALITY Kathy Gyngell and David Keighley THE AUTHORS Kathy Gyngell is a director of Minotaur Media Tracking. Formerly Features Editor at TV-am, she has also worked in the Features and Current Affairs Department at London Weekend Television and was a Research Fellow at the Centre for Television Research at Leeds University. David Keighley, also a director of Minotaur Media Tracking, is a former BBC and newspaper journalist who was publicist for the BBC’s news and current affairs output. He was also director of public affairs of TV-am and is the founder of News World, an international conference for news broadcasters. Kathy Gyngell and David Keighley are the co-authors of An Outbreak of Narcolepsy: why the BBC must improve its coverage of the EU. The aim of the Centre for Policy Studies is to develop and promote policies that provide freedom and encouragement for individuals to pursue the aspirations they have for themselves and their families, within the security and obligations of a stable and law-abiding nation. The views expressed in our publications are, however, the sole responsibility of the authors. Contributions are chosen for their value in informing public debate and should not be taken as representing a corporate view of the CPS or of its Directors. The CPS values its independence and does not carry on activities with the intention of affecting public support for any registered political party or for candidates at election, or to influence voters in a referendum. Centre for Policy Studies, June 2004 ISBN No: 1 903219 72 8 Centre for Policy Studies 57 Tufton Street, London SW1P 3QL Tel: 020 7222 4488 Fax: 020 7222 4388 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.cps.org.uk Printed by The Centre for Policy Studies, 57 Tufton Street, London SW1 CONTENTS SUMMARY FOREWORD 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. THE U-TURN 4 3. A BULWARK AGAINST A EUROSCEPTIC PRESS? 23 APPENDIX I: MONITORING STATISTICS APPENDIX 2: BACKGROUND TO THE PAPER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The research on which this paper is based has been funded by Global Britain, a cross-party think tank whose principals are Lord Pearson of Rannoch, Lord Stoddart of Swindon and Lord Harris of High Cross. The authors have worked on an entirely independent basis throughout. Global Britain has not had any influence in the content of the research work, other than in matters of fact. The authors are also extremely grateful to Andrew Jubb who has been responsible for the detailed monitoring of the BBC’s output in this and other papers. SUMMARY ! On Tuesday 20 April 2004, Tony Blair formally announced his decision to hold a referendum on whether to accept the proposed EU Constitution. This announcement had been expected since Thursday 15 April. It was a major change of direction of Government policy. ! In the light of well-publicised concerns over its coverage of the EU, the BBC now had an opportunity, and the obligation, to achieve coverage that was balanced, fair and authoritative. ! On the day of the announcement the BBC’s coverage was carefully monitored to see whether this was achieved. Airtime Imbalance ! Of all the flagship news and current affairs programmes surveyed on Radio 4, BBC1 and BBC2, 38.4% of airtime was devoted to the referendum story. ! There were 62 contributions by outside speakers, totalling 88 minutes. Of this total, Europhile contributions took 61%. Eurosceptic contributions, which included the Conservative response, accounted for only 30% of the total airtime. This imbalance is hard to understand. ! From the three main parties, 65% of the spokesmen came from the Government; (31 minutes); 27% from the Conservatives (12 minutes 42 seconds); and 8% from the Liberal Democrats (4 minutes). ! 6 minutes 48 seconds were given to the Prime Minister’s House of Commons soundbites while only 1 minute 47 seconds were allocated to Michael Howard’s refutation. i ! Of the eight guest speakers on the Today programme of 20 April, only one was a recognised Eurosceptic (Sir Malcolm Rifkind). He was allotted only 37 seconds. Three were strongly Europhile (Donald Anderson MP; Simon Buckby and Jack Cunningham MP); two were from broadly Europhile publications (The Independent and The New Statesman); and two were mildly Eurosceptic. Presentational bias ! The Government’s presentational strategy at the time of the announcement was to try to depict those arguing against the Constitution as advocates of withdrawal from the EU. As the Prime Minister declared to the House of Commons: "It is time to resolve once and for all whether this country, Britain, wants to be at the centre and heart of European decision-making or not; time to decide whether our destiny lies as a leading partner and ally of Europe or on its margins. Let the Eurosceptics whose true agenda we will expose, make their case.” ! This line was, whether intentionally or not, consistently reflected in the BBC’s coverage. For example, Michael Ancram was questioned aggressively on the World at One on this subject “Are you happy to fight this battle on the terms Tony Blair has dictated, exposing your wider anti–European agenda, as he puts it?”; whereas Baroness Williams’ statement that “there are a lot of people who are going to support the ‘no’ side, who really do want to get out of the European Union altogether” was allowed to pass unchallenged. ! The Conservative arguments for a referendum were barely covered. Today and The World at One paid little attention to the Eurosceptic arguments, while PM demoted its sole Eurosceptic contribution to the last minutes of the programme. In the 10 o’clock News, there was no reporting of the Eurosceptic dimension at all nor was there any report of the Conservative response. Poor journalistic standards ! The Constitution was presented solely and uncritically as a requirement for enlargement. Many Eurosceptics would argue that, while administrative reforms may be necessary for the EU, enlargement does not depend on the adoption of the Constitution as presently drafted. ! There was misleading and inadequate reporting of developments relating to the Government’s ‘red lines’ between December 2003 and April 2004. For example, the BBC accepted without analysis the Government’s claim that it had secured its red lines in the Brussels summit in December 2003. ! In the consideration of Mr Blair’s U-turn, the BBC did not challenge the one- sided Europhile interpretation of the lessons to be learned from the Irish referenda on the Treaty of Nice. ! Conservative policy was mis-represented and identified too closely with the UKIP policy of withdrawal. ii FOREWORD Since 1999, Minotaur has monitored in detail more than 2,000 hours of BBC output, made more than 2,000 programme transcripts and written 15 separate reports. The reports have found consistent areas of bias which chime closely with what was found during the period surveyed in this paper.1 This reinforces the claim that the findings of these two days are not a one-off aberration. Minotaur’s reports were all sent to the Chairman of the BBC, since the Chairman and Governors are ultimately responsible for the BBC’s discharge of its public service remit. A serious problem has been that the Chairman passed them to the BBC’s management for adjudication, which dismissed them as unfounded (see correspondence between Lords Harris of High Cross, Pearson of Rannoch and Stoddart of Swindon with the BBC Chairman 1999-2004 at www.globalbritain.org). It is encouraging to learn that in future the Governors may be advised in this vital area not by the managers themselves but by people who are independent of management. It is most encouraging to learn that in future the Governors may be advised in this vital area not by the managers themselves but by people who are independent of management. It will be seen, however, that much still needs to be done if the BBC is to achieve balance in its coverage of the EU. 1 The key findings of earlier reports can be found in Appendix 2. CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION We broadcasters are stranded in a European no man’s land – certain to come under fire from both sides. The pros declare our job is to counter the myths of the antis. That of course is not what we are in the business for. Yet if we don’t we will be accused of following the agenda of the Eurosceptic press… What is the answer then? To admit that there is no single truth: …in other words to shun the current allergy to debate and disagreement. Nick Robinson, political editor of ITV News, The Times, 23 April 2004 It appears that the BBC has taken on board some of the criticisms made of its low level of coverage of the European Union.2 It has acknowledged that the EU-related output needs monitoring and has commissioned a six-month independent review,3 ahead of an expected referendum on the proposed EU Constitution. And it would also appear that awareness is permeating down through the editorial hierarchy: discussing the recent Centre for Policy Studies paper, An Outbreak of Narcolepsy, BBC Radio 4’s ‘The Message’,4 deputy director of News and Current Affairs, Mark Damazer acknowledged that the BBC’s coverage of the EU needed to be improved: 2 For details of the low level of coverage, and the lack of attention to detail to EU- related issues, see An Outbreak of Narcolepsy: why the BBC must improve its coverage of the EU, Centre for Policy Studies, 2004. 3 Daily Telegraph, 5 May 2004. 4 30 April 2004.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Amendment) Bill
    Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport with the agreement of Theresa Villiers, are published separately as Bill 182—EN. Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill CONTENTS 1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009: repeal of sunset provision 2 Extent, commencement and short title Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill 1 A BILL TO Prevent the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 from expiring on 11 November 2019. E IT ENACTED by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present BParliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— 1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009: repeal of sunset provision In section 4 of the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009— (a) in the heading, for “, commencement and sunset” substitute “and commencement”, and (b) omit subsection (7) (which provides for the Act to expire after 10 years). 5 2 Extent, commencement and short title (1) This Act extends to— (a) England and Wales, and (b) Scotland. (2) This Act comes into force on the day on which it is passed. 10 (3) This Act may be cited as the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Act 2018. Bill 182 57/1 Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) (Amendment) Bill A BILL To prevent the Holocaust (Return of Cultural Objects) Act 2009 from expiring on 11 November 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • 29 March 2020
    12 – 29 March 2020 OVER 250 AUTHORS APPEARING, INCLUDING: MAGGIE O’FARRELL JOANNA TROLLOPE BABITA SHARMA ANTON DU BEKE DAVID LAMMY MP BILL DRUMMOND PRUE LEITH VAL MCDERMID SALLY MAGNUSSON JOHN PARTRIDGE SIR OLIVER LETWIN TOM KERRIDGE BERNARDINE EVARISTO KATHLEEN JAMIE RACHEL REEVES MP ANDREW MARR GREG MCHUGH JOHN BERCOW BOOK TICKETS AT AYEWRITE.COM 15 YEARS OF AYE WRITE – SOMETHING TO CELEBRATE! Aye Write and Wee Write have become much loved and key each year. The programme this year includes over 260 authors fixtures in our city’s events calendar each year. 15 years have and more than 200 events which are only available thanks to the passed since the inaugural Aye Write and in that time the festivals incredible support from all our volunteers who have contributed have played an incredible part in engaging more people in a staggering 3,000 hours of their time. This year also sees the reading and writing activities, debates and discussions. return of our Wee Write Schools Programme that will reach up to 12,000 children as well our family day takeover at The Mitchell Because of your love of books and reading we are, together, Library on 7th March. achieving amazing things: you have donated to the Wee Write Reading and Literacy Fund, helping raise almost £10,000 for We would love to hear about the things you love about Aye Write children’s reading; you have enabled us to give 2,000 free tickets so please get in touch via our social media channels or come and through our Community Ticketing initiative to individuals who say hello to any of the festival team when you see them at The have never been to a book festival before; and you have helped Mitchell Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Karpf/The Sound of Home? Some Thoughts on How the Radio Voice Anchors, Contains and Sometimes Pierces (Pre-Print Version; Published in The
    1 Anne Karpf/The sound of home? Some thoughts on how the radio voice anchors, contains and sometimes pierces (pre-print version; published in The Radio Journal, vol.11, no.1, April 2013, pp.59-73) Abstract This article argues that while psychoanalytic theory has been valuably employed by television, film and cultural studies, there has been no comparable 'psychoanalytic turn' in radio studies. It suggests that the concept of 'containment', as developed variously by Wilfred Bion and Esther Bick, might go some way to explain the powerful role that the voice of the radio presenter can play in the regular listener's internal world, with the capacity both to 'hold' the listener together, and to transform overwhelming fears into more manageable feelings. It argues that the disembodied radio voice does this partly because it recalls the prenatal power of the maternal voice, and partly through the temporal order that regular radio voices impose on the internal and external world. Both Second World War British radio catchphrases and Roosevelt's Fireside Chats are discussed in relation to their containment function. The article also explores the radio as a transitional space, as defined by Donald Winnicott, through which it can constitute listeners into an 'imagined community'. It ends by reflecting on the impact of the angry voice of 2 the 'shock-jock' which, it suggests, amplifies rather than contains overwhelming feelings.1 Contributor's details Anne Karpf is Reader in Professional Writing and Cultural Inquiry at London Metropolitan University. A journalist, broadcaster and radio critic of The Guardian for seven years, her books include 'The Human Voice' (Bloomsbury, 2006; Ehrenwirth, 2007; Autrement, 2008; Soshisha, 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of English and American Studies UKIP And
    Masaryk University Faculty of Arts Department of English and American Studies English Language and Literature Anders Heger UKIP and British Politics Bachelor‟s Diploma Thesis Supervisor: Stephen Paul Hardy, Ph.D. 2015 I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. ..................................................... Author‟s signature Acknowledgement I would like to express my thanks towards the Masaryk University and the Czech Republic for providing me with free education and I would also like to thank my supervisor, Mr. Hardy, for his support and much appreciated counsel. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5 The History of UKIP ..................................................................................................................... 8 Allan Sked and the First Years .................................................................................................. 8 Change of Leadership and Becoming the Fourth Largest Party ............................................. 12 Becoming a Political Party ...................................................................................................... 16 The Beginning of a New Era ................................................................................................... 21 Analysing the Party‟s Policies ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Pseudo-Revolution in Libya and the Degenerate “Left”, PART I : the Pseudo-Revolution in Libya, TAKIS FOTOPOULOS
    The pseudo-revolution in Libya and the Degenerate “Left”, PART I : The pseudo-revolution in Libya, TAKIS FOTOPOULOS The International Journal of INCLUSIVE DEMOCRACY , Vol. 7, No. 1 (Winter-Spring 2011) The pseudo-revolution in Libya and the Degenerate “Left” TAKIS FOTOPOULOS PART I : The pseudo-revolution in Libya ...also read Part II: The role of the degenerate "Left" 1. Introduction To avoid any misconceptions or deliberate distortions of the stand taken by this paper (there have already been accusations by what I call the present degenerate “Left” — statist and libertarian alike — that I am a “pro-Caddafist,” a “plot theorist,” a “supporter of dictatorial regimes,” etc., particularly since I was also against the transnational elite’s[1] criminal attacks on Yugoslavia, [2] Afghanistan [3] and Iraq [4] ), I think it is necessary to state, explicitly and in advance, the principles guiding this paper. The reader will, then, have a clear opportunity to assess its conclusions against these principles and draw his/her own conclusions. Basic principles guiding this paper 1. Fundamental to this analysis is the libertarian principle of peoples’ self determination, which should never be violated for supposedly humanitarian reasons (like those invoked by the arch-criminals of the transnational elite) or pseudo-“anarchist” reasons, according to which states are not sacrosanct (see Chomsky-Part II). 2. Although it is true that states are not sacred, and social liberation is impossible unless peoples live in free confederations of their own communities securing the equal distribution of political and economic power among all citizens, national liberation is a precondition for any social liberation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • "Fight to the Finish." Darcus Howe: a Political Biography. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014
    Bunce, Robin, and Paul Field. "Fight to the Finish." Darcus Howe: A Political Biography. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014. 253–266. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 23 Sep. 2021. <http:// dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472544407.ch-019>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 23 September 2021, 14:43 UTC. Copyright © Robin Bunce and Paul Field 2014. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 1 9 Fight to the Finish On Monday 27 September 2010, more than a thousand people gathered to pay their last respects to Frank Crichlow. Th e funeral, the culmination of a week of mourning, took place at St Mary ’ s of the Angle on Morehouse Road. Th e congregation and many more, who could not fi t into the packed church, processed through Notting Hill to the West London Crematorium. Th e size and diversity of the crowd was a testament to the breadth of respect that Crichlow commanded. Th e mourners included the biggest names from Britain ’ s Black Power Movement including Howe, Althea Jones-Lecointe and her husband Eddie who had fl own in from Trinidad for the occasion, as well as Rhodan Gordon. Th ere were also more mainstream black activists and politicians such as Lee Jasper and Paul Boateng; the fi lm maker Horace Ové and hundreds of ordinary people, not political in any obvious sense, whose lives Crichlow had touched. Boateng gave the eulogy, recalling Crichlow ’ s activism, his smile, and his ‘ grace under pressure, and boy was there pressure ’ (Boateng 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Brave New World Service a Unique Opportunity for the Bbc to Bring the World to the UK
    BRAVE NEW WORLD SERVIce A UNIQUE OPPORTUNITY FOR THE BBC TO BRING THE WORLD TO THE UK JOHN MCCaRTHY WITH CHARLOTTE JENNER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Value 4 Integration: A Brave New World Service? 8 Conclusion 16 Recommendations 16 INTERVIEWEES Steven Barnett, Professor of Communications, Ishbel Matheson, Director of Media, Save the Children and University of Westminster former East Africa Correspondent, BBC World Service John Baron MP, Member of Foreign Affairs Select Committee Rod McKenzie, Editor, BBC Radio 1 Newsbeat and Charlie Beckett, Director, POLIS BBC 1Xtra News Tom Burke, Director of Global Youth Work, Y Care International Richard Ottaway MP, Chair, Foreign Affairs Select Committee Alistair Burnett, Editor, BBC World Tonight Rita Payne, Chair, Commonwealth Journalists Mary Dejevsky, Columnist and leader writer, The Independent Association and former Asia Editor, BBC World and former newsroom subeditor, BBC World Service Marcia Poole, Director of Communications, International Jim Egan, Head of Strategy and Distribution, BBC Global News Labour Organisation (ILO) and former Head of the Phil Harding, Journalist and media consultant and former World Service training department Director of English Networks and News, BBC World Service Stewart Purvis, Professor of Journalism and former Lindsey Hilsum, International Editor, Channel 4 News Chief Executive, ITN Isabel Hilton, Editor of China Dialogue, journalist and broadcaster Tony Quinn, Head of Planning, JWT Mary Hockaday, Head of BBC Newsroom Nick Roseveare, Chief Executive, BOND Peter
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the EU Referendum Debate
    ‘What country, friends, is this?’ A guide to the EU referendum debate ‘What country, friends, is this?’ A guide to the EU referendum debate Foreword 4 Professor Nick Pearce, Director of the Institute for Policy Research Public attitudes and political 6 discourses on the EU in the Brexit referendum 7 ‘To be or not to be?’ ‘Should I stay or should I go?’ and other clichés: the 2016 UK referendum on EU membership Dr Nicholas Startin, Deputy Head of the Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 16 The same, but different: Wales and the debate over EU membership Dr David Moon, Lecturer, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 21 The EU debate in Northern Ireland Dr Sophie Whiting, Lecturer, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 24 Will women decide the outcome of the EU referendum? Dr Susan Milner, Reader, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 28 Policy debates 29 Brexit and the City of London: a clear and present danger Professor Chris Martin, Professor of Economics, Department of Economics 33 The economics of the UK outside the Eurozone: what does it mean for the UK if/when Eurozone integration deepens? Implications of Eurozone failures for the UK Dr Bruce Morley, Lecturer in Economics, Department of Economics 38 Security in, secure out: Brexit’s impact on security and defence policy Professor David Galbreath, Professor of International Security, Associate Dean (Research) 42 Migration and EU membership Dr Emma Carmel, Senior Lecturer, Department of Social & Policy Sciences 2 ‘What country, friends, is this?’ A guide to the EU referendum debate 45 Country perspectives 46 Debating the future of Europe is essential, but when will we start? The perspective from France Dr Aurelien Mondon, Senior Lecturer, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 52 Germany versus Brexit – the reluctant hegemon is not amused Dr Alim Baluch, Teaching Fellow, Department of Politics, Languages & International Studies 57 The Brexit referendum is not only a British affair.
    [Show full text]
  • Danny Kruger Selected As Conservative Parliamentary Candidate for Devizes
    Press Release t (Press) 020 7984 8121 t (Broadcast) 020 7984 8180 f 020 7222 1135 Saturday 9 November 2019 Danny Kruger selected as Conservative Parliamentary candidate for Devizes A close aide of Prime Minister Boris Johnson has been selected as the Conservative Parliamentary candidate for Devizes. Danny Kruger was chosen at a selection meeting at the Corn Exchange in Devizes this afternoon (Saturday), which was attended by over 300 (CHECK) local Conservative members. Danny has been political secretary to the Prime Minister since July 2019 and has previously worked as chief speechwriter to David Cameron when he was Leader of the Opposition and an adviser to former Conservative Party leaders Iain Duncan Smith and Michael Howard. He helped to develop Mr Cameron’s ‘Big Society’ agenda and is keen to promote the same ethos in Devizes, empowering volunteers, businesses and community groups to tackle local issues and challenges. Danny is keen to boost local NHS services, support the police to tackle rural crime, ensure schools get their fair share of increased funding, push for greater infrastructure investment, enhance the rail and bus network and help businesses be more productive. He is a strong supporter of the Armed Forces and wants to ensure the relocation of service families to Wiltshire is a success for everyone. Danny supports Mr Johnson’s determination to get Brexit done as soon as possible and forge a positive new relationship with the EU. “I’m proud and excited to be selected as the Conservative Parliamentary candidate for Devizes and I’m looking forward to knocking on doors, meeting local people and addressing their concerns,” said Danny.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 494 24 June 2009 No. 98 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 24 June 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; Tel: 0044 (0) 208876344; e-mail: [email protected] 777 24 JUNE 2009 778 rightly made the case. I hope she will understand when I House of Commons point her to the work of the World Bank and other international financial institutions on infrastructure in Wednesday 24 June 2009 Ukraine and other countries. We will continue to watch the regional economic needs of Ukraine through our involvement with those institutions. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Mr. Gary Streeter (South-West Devon) (Con): Given PRAYERS the strategic significance of Ukraine as a political buffer zone between the EU and Russia, does the Minister not think that it was perhaps an error of judgment to close [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] the DFID programme in Ukraine last year? It would be an utter tragedy if Ukraine’s democracy should fail, so BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS should we not at the very least be running significant capacity-building programmes to support it? SPOLIATION ADVISORY PANEL Resolved, Mr. Thomas: We are running capacity-building programmes on democracy and good governance through That an Humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That she will be graciously pleased to give directions that there be laid the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Obama Birth Certificate Proven Fake
    Obama Birth Certificate Proven Fake Is Carlyle always painstaking and graduate when spouts some vibrissa very unfilially and latterly? Needier Jamie exculpates that runabouts overcomes goldarn and systemises algebraically. Gentile Virge attires her gangplanks so forth that Newton let-downs very magisterially. Obama's Birth Certificate Archives FactCheckorg. On Passports Being Denied to American Citizens in South Texas. Hawaii confirmed that Obama has a stable birth certificate from Hawaii Regardless of become the document on the web is portable or tampered the. Would have any of none of you did have posted are. American anger directed at the years. And fake diploma is obama birth certificate proven fake certificates are simply too! Obama fake information do other forms of the courts have the former president obama birth certificate now proven wrong units in sweet snap: obama birth certificate proven fake! The obama birth certificate proven fake service which is proven false if barack was born, where is an airplane in! Hawaiian officials would expect vaccines and obama birth certificate proven fake the president? No, nobody said that. It had anything himself because they want to? Feedback could for users to respond. Joe Arpaio Obama's birth certificate is it 'phony Reddit. As Donald Trump embarked on his presidential campaign, he doubled down with what his opponents found offensive. He knows that bailout now and there reason, obama for the supreme bully trump, many website in? And proven false and knows sarah palin has taken a thing is not the obama birth certificate proven fake. Mark Mardell's America Obama releases birth BBC.
    [Show full text]