584-7251 Cell/Fax
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1 PATRICK MISSUD CA #219614 91 San Juan Ave. 2 San Francisco, CA, 94112 3 415-845-5540; 584-7251 Cell/Fax http://www.judgesforsale.org/cook-bell-county.html; 4 http://www.judgesforsale.org/---judge-elfving---.html; http://www.sanfranciscosuperiorcourtfraud.com/home.html; 5 5-Year 18 USC §1513 Informant and Mole; 6 Attorney and Plaintiff in Pro-Se; [email protected]; https://www.facebook.com/patrick.missud.1 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TRANSFERRED TO THE SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT ON 11-24-14 10 UNLIMITED JURISDICTION CLASS ACTION 11 Publicized Jury Trial Demanded 12 13 PATRICK A. MISSUD, Case No.: CGC-14-537723 and those similarly situated 14 vs. DECLARATION OF PATRICK MISSUD 15 STATE OF CALIFORNIA; CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; SAN RE: CALIFORNIA RULES OF EVIDENCE §§450 PROOF SPECIFICALLY DISCUSSED 16 FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT; IN AND FOR THE RECORD DURING THE GREG SUHR individually; SAN MARCH 6TH 2015 HEARING 17 FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT- 18 ATION AUTHORITY; TOM NOLAN individually; AUTO-RETURN; JOHN Date: 19 WICKER individually; SAN FRANCISCO Time: TRIAL COURTS; CYNTHIA LEE Dept.: 3 20 individually; XEROX SOLUTIONS; LDC 18 USC §2381 Judge: Elfving 21 COLLECTIONS; DAVID CUMMINS individually; DOES 1-200. Defendants. 22 DECLARATION BY 5-YEAR NSA MOLE MISSUD: 23 (1) My job is to get corrupt judges indicted for: intentional violations of law and their oaths to 24 support the constitution [18 USC §201 Corruption, §1962Racketeering, §2381 Treason]; and 25 abusing their lofty offices of public trust [Honest Services Fraud]. 26 (2) Sometimes catching a corrupt judge is as easy as getting him/her on-record feigning non- 27 receipt of legal pleadings verifiably sent/received by tracked USPS mail or by email/fax [18 USC 28 §1341/43 Mail and Wire Fraud]. th Declaration Re: The March 6 2015 Hearing 1 1 (3) I purposely attended the March 6th 2015 Hearing in cases CGC-14-537723 & 536981 with 2 the specific intent of adding additional prison time to Elfving’s already life-long prison sentence 3 by getting him to ignore CRE §§450 evidence which he has to by law acknowledge and consider. 4 (4) This pleading is purposefully filed today March 9th on the 2-month anniversary of my False 5 Imprisonment which Elfving caused because he doesn’t want to go to prison until dead. 6 (5) The March 6th Transcript was already ordered and has to be produced for at least 20 civil & 7 criminal: cases, appeals, and writs, -half of which are still active.1 See Exhibit A. 8 (6) The Hearing began with a discussion of the City’s Motion for Demurrer in 537723 which 9 City Attorney Dennis Herrera started rigging with judge Elfving back on January 9th 2015. See 10 the January 9th Transcript attached as Exhibit B wherein at page 20 Elfving asks Deputy City 11 Attorney Brian Ceballo on the best way to rig the March 6th Motion for Demurrer. 12 (7) Soon after the March 6th Hearing started, I explained that just like in the FBI’s 1984 Chicago 13 sting called “Operation Greylord,” San Francisco’s officials, county judges, sheriff deputies, 14 police officers & court staff were colluding to rig traffic citations, hearings & trials. 15 (8) I then reminded Elfving about the FBI’s 2009 Bell California sting wherein 7 city managers 16 were indicted and convicted for targeting mostly Hispanic-Americans for bogus, civil-rights- 17 violating, revenue-raising citations, tows & arrests. 18 (9) I then explained that just two days prior on March 4th, US Attorney General Holder released 19 findings proving that the Ferguson Police Dept. targeted mostly African-Americans for bogus, 20 civil-rights-violating, revenue-raising citations, tows & arrests. 21 (10) I then personally served Elfving with yet another copy of the January 7th 2015 Subpoena, 22 that he’d already received by multiple verified means, and which attached CRE §§450 concrete 23 proof in the form of official state DMV records and defendant admissions that San Francisco was 24 running the same Operation Greylord schemes which targeted Hispanics, Blacks, and lower 25 socio-economic groups least likely to have time or money to oppose SF’s City Hall which takes 26 “you can’t fight City Hall” to the next unconstitutional level. 27 1 28 “Active” = San Francisco $uperior Court: CGC-14-536981, 537723, 15-543711; Santa Clara $uperior Court: C1502123; 115-cv-275919; First District Court of Appeal A141459, 143554; California Supreme Court S222905; Ninth Circuit 14-16494, 16509. th Declaration Re: The March 6 2015 Hearing 2 1 (11) I specifically informed Elfving to look at two self-authenticating California DMV 2 registration documents proving that two of my registered cars were illegally-towed under color- 3 of-law for feigned ‘scofflaw registration,’ but which made the city an enormous $1200 for less 4 than an hour’s revenue-raising ‘work.’ 5 (12) I also specifically informed Elfving to look at Ceballo’s non-hearsay June 13th 2014 6 admission/letter wherein he lied that San Francisco didn’t have an illegal, revenue-raising, profit- 7 sharing, anticompetitive, Cartwright-Act-violating agreement with exclusive tow contractor 8 Auto-Return which twice-billed me for using tow equipment that was never actually used when 9 stealing my registered cars. 10 (13) Elfving simply and unlawfully ignored all that and more CRE §§450 concrete proof 11 regarding the City’s transparent racketeering & Ceballo’s criminally-proven lie$, and then 12 dismissed Deputy City Attorney Ceballo from the 2nd Half of the Hearing. 13 (14) The 2nd Half continued with a hearing on my Motion for Reconsideration of Elfving’s 14 corrupt January 9th 2015 Orders in and for criminally-proven case 536981 which exposes how 15 the Bar and its judge$ rigged my “involuntary disbarment” because I expose corrupt judge$ like 16 Elfving who ignore any and all evidence proving official & judicial corruption like during the 1st 17 half of the Hearing with Ceballo. 18 (15) Elfving feigned the Motion filed in 536981 hadn’t been properly noticed when in-fact the 19 official docket proved it was timely filed, verifiably served on opposing parties, and scheduled 20 for March 6th when Elfving and the parties agreed they’d be available. 21 (16) Elfving nevertheless made believe that Bar Court defendants Armendariz, Remke, Cantil- 22 Sakauye et al., -who happen to be judges, didn’t have adequate notice, although they have two 23 battalions of in-house & independent defense attorneys representing them, -who usually “court- 24 call” into hearings from their comfy offices because they can’t be troubled to appear in-person.2 25 26 2 27 To name but a few in the battalion: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], 28 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], th Declaration Re: The March 6 2015 Hearing 3 1 (17) I then physically pulled-out the official docket for case 536981 and pointed-out that even 2 though the all-knowing judicial Defendants and their two Battalions had ample Notice of the 3 properly-filed Motion, none deemed it worthy of any Opposition. 4 (18) Following that, I cited California Law that says unopposed motions are usually decided in 5 favor of the motioning party since the non-motioning party adopts by silence the motioning 6 party’s position by not opposing. That’s a fact and the law. 7 (19) I concluded the 2nd Half of the Hearing by telling Elfving that the only reason he illegally 8 sanctioned me with $6000 on January 9th was because he rigged that hearing by lying I didn’t 9 Oppose the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss argued on November 21st 2014, when in-fact he got 10 multiple copies of my verifiably-served Opposition in the form of a Proposed Order which 11 attached concrete, non-hearsay, self-authenticating, and always-reliable CRE §§450 proof.3 12 (20) Finally take note that Elfving also got served with the March 4th 2015: 13 “MANDATORY JUDICIAL NOTICE THAT JUDGE WILLIAM ELFVING IS SET-UP FOR INDICTMENT ON AND FOR THIS MARCH 6TH 2015 HEARING” 14 15 It included the following text and additional 20 declarations: 16 ALL PARTIES TAKE NOTICE THAT judge Elfving is already set-up for indictment for additional violations of Honest Services Fraud, and USC Title 18: §201 Corruption; §1962 17 Racketeering; and §2381 Treason among other Codes. On March 6th, Elfving will have to 18 acknowledge the Subpoena which he already unlawfully ignored at least four times to grant these 19 criminal defendants’ Demurrer. Elfving will ignore all the following for the record: 20 (1) Defendants repeatedly and purposely failed to produce public records demanded not only 21 under subpoena, but also City Sunshine and California’s Open Government Statutes. 22 th (2) On June 13 2014, these Defendants lied about not having a profit-sharing contract among 23 themselves, and which targets the public for illegal takings and grand theft auto. 24 25 26 27 3 st th The November 21 Opposition/Proposed Order was filed on the docket on November 7 , tracked by the USPS to th 28 Elfving’s Clerk E. Ernesto on November 8 at 6:57AM, and also positively served by email directly to: Elfving and his clerk; Elfving’s court: civil, pretrial & bailiff/sheriff departments; and to 150+/- media and law enforcement contacts for corroboration.