DOCSLIB.ORG

Monday, July 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monday, July 3 Israel and the Middle East News Update Friday, October 21 Headlines: US, Egypt to Palestinians: Don’t Push UN Resolution Before Elections US imposes Sanctions on Hezbollah Operatives, Financiers Abbas Wants Fatah, PLO Leadership Elections Next Month Poll: '46% of Palestinians Support a Jordan –Palestinian Confederation Protestors in Amona: They’ll Need to Drag us From our Homes Democrats Recruit Joe Lieberman to Target Florida Jews Email Show Clinton keen to Patch Things Up with Netanyahu Commentary: Yedioth Ahronoth: “ It’s Not Netanyahu, It’s You” By Haim Ramon, former Minister in the Israeli Government Al Monitor: “Why Human Rights NGOs are Losing Support of Israeli Public” By Shlomi Eldar, columnist at Al Monitor S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor ● David Abreu, Associate Editor News Excerpts October 21, 2016 Ha’aretz US, Egypt to Pal’: Don’t Push UN Res. Before Elections Both Egypt and the United States have warned the Palestinian leadership not to advance any moves at the UN Security Council until after the U.S. presidential election next month, a senior Palestinian official told Ha’aretz on Thursday. Egypt currently holds a rotating seat on the Security Council and the U.S. is a permanent member. The messages were sent both directly and indirectly to the PA, through Western and Arab intermediaries. The messages stressed that until the U.S. election is over, Washington will veto any resolution on the Israeli-Palestinian issue, including a denunciation of the settlements. See also “PALESTINIANS URGE UN TO ADOPT RESOLUTION AGAINST SETTLEMENTS (AP) Ynet News US imposes Sanctions on Hezbollah Operatives, Financiers The US government on Thursday sanctioned a Hezbollah commander and a number of other operatives and financiers linked to the militant group who it said were working to destabilize the Middle East. The US State Department, added Hezbollah commander Haytham Ali Tabatabai to its Specially Designated Global Terrorist list, which "imposes sanctions on foreign persons determined to have committed, or pose a serious risk of committing acts of terrorism." Tabatabai has commanded Hezbollah special forces, operated in Syria and is now believed to be in Yemen. His actions in Syria and Yemen "are part of a larger Hezbollah effort in destabilizing regional activities." See also, “US, Saudi Arabia blacklist Hezbollah members, financiers” (Times of Israel) Times of Israel Abbas Wants Fatah, PLO Leadership Elections Next Month Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is pushing for leadership elections in his Fatah movement and the PLO before the end of the year, as part of what senior officials say is largely an elaborate attempt to block the return of an exiled rival backed by several Arab states. Abbas’s decision to hold such elections is a response to growing Arab pressure to take back Mohammad Dahlan, a former top aide and millionaire businessman who in exile forged close ties with leaders of Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and other countries in the region. See also, “SEEKING TO BLOCK RIVAL, ABBAS CALLS FOR FATAH, PLO ELECTIONS” (AP) Jerusalem Post Poll: '46% of Pal. Support a Jordan –Pal. Confederation More Palestinians prefer the establishment of a Jordanian-Palestinian confederation than a traditional two-state or one-state solution, a new public opinion poll has found. An-Najah National University in Nablus surveyed 1362 Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza Strip. 46% of Palestinians surveyed said they would support the establishment of a Palestinian-Jordanian confederation on the basis of two states with strong institutional relations. In contrast, 36% of Palestinians said they would support the establishment of a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders. Only 22% of Palestinians support the creation of a state on 1967 borders with some land swaps. 2 Ynet News Protestors in Amona: They’ll Need to Drag us From Here Thousands of people attended a protest in the outpost of Amona on Thursday, calling on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to resist the High Court’s decision to evacuate the settlement in two months’ time; the protest was attended by MKs from the Likud and Bayit Yehudi. A similar protest will also take place in the outpost of Ofra. “We’re going to fight for our home here, and they’re going to have to drag us from our homes,” said Avihai boaron, headquarters chairperson of the Fight for Amona. “If we find ourselves dealing with an evacuation, it won’t go over quietly. The protest rally took place as politicians from the right attempt to have the High Court postpone the evacuation. See also, “Far-right Minister Threatens to Topple Netanyahu Over Contested Settler Outpost” (Ha’aretz) The Jewish Insider Democrats Recruit Joe Lieberman to Target Florida Jews The former senator spoke to Jewish seniors at Palm Beach Century Village and held a roundtable with rabbis and Jewish community leaders in Palm Beach, according to the Clinton campaign. He also spoke at a shul in Broward County. Jewish voters represent 3 to 6 percent of the electorate in Florida. Clinton is ahead by 3.8 percentage points in Florida. Jewish Insider has learned that Lieberman will be featured in a new highly targeted campaign kicking off this weekend by the “Jews for Progress” super PAC, aimed at Jewish voters who are still undecided or persuadable. According to a source with close knowledge of the upcoming activities, in the coming days, JFP will call more than 100,000 unique Jewish households in Florida and launch an online, email and social media campaign in an effort to replicate a successful campaign in 2012 in putting Florida in the Democratic column with the help of Jewish voters. See also “Clinton more reliable for Israel than Trump – and Obama, Lieberman says” (Jerusalem Post) Times of Israel Email Show Clinton keen to Patch Things with Netanyahu Hillary Clinton’s plan to meet Israel’s prime minister in her first month as president is listed high in an internal campaign memo outlining the priorities of her first 100 days — a sign of how important it is to repair bilateral tensions. he campaign’s determination to distance itself from President Barack Obama’s difficult relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu is seeded throughout emails stolen from her campaign chairman John Podesta’s private account and dumped in recent weeks by WikiLeaks. (Podesta is one of the officials CC’d on the first 100 days memo.) The leaked emails offer a glimpse of the sausage-making of a presidential candidate’s policies when it comes to Israel, the Iran deal and the boycott Israel movement — sometimes spicy, sometimes bland and sometimes hard to swallow. 3 Yedioth Ahronoth– October 21, 2016 It’s Not Netanyahu, It’s You By Haim Ramon After Binyamin Netanyahu became prime minister for the second time, in March 2009, he and the late Shimon Peres, who was president at the time, had a political love affair. After urging Netanyahu to resume peace negotiations, Peres became convinced that there was a good chance that the prime minister would lead Israel to an arrangement. Following the Bar Ilan speech that Netanyahu gave in June 2009, in which he declared his ostensible commitment to the two-state solution, and following [Peres’s] conversations with Netanyahu and his wife Sara, Peres believed that Netanyahu had changed his spots and would act differently from his first term as prime minister. At that time, I met with Peres regularly. “Bibi realizes that the reality compels him to make history. What happened to Begin and Sharon is happening to him,” he told me over and over. He insisted that Netanyahu had undergone a turnabout: From a person who was not willing to make any territorial concessions, he had become a pragmatic leader who sought to end the conflict with the Palestinians and was willing to take the main step necessary for this, meaning—to give up the 1967 territories, subject to a land swap that would leave the settlement blocs in Israel’s hands. Knowing Netanyahu’s firm ideological commitment to the vision of the greater Israel, I was convinced that Peres’s forecast would be disproved. I knew that Netanyahu was not changing his ideology in order to survive, but was rather making an effort to survive in order to implement his ideology. I said repeatedly to Peres: “Bibi won’t sign any arrangement with the Palestinians. He is fooling you. He is fundamentally opposed to the two-state solution and will not give up a single inch of the 1967 territories.” […] The arguments between us reached very high tones at times, but to no avail. Peres became Netanyahu’s advocate in Israel and throughout the world. Peres explained on every possible platform that Netanyahu was working sincerely to reach a peace arrangement with the Palestinians. In one meeting, Peres revealed that Netanyahu had permitted him to conduct secret negotiations with Abu Mazen. I stuck to my guns: “That won’t happen, there won’t be an agreement,” but Peres believed that it was not him but me who was clinging to a mistaken preconception of Netanyahu. One hot summer day, Peres’s hopes were crushed. On July 28, 2011 he was supposed to sign a diplomatic declaration of principles with Abu Mazen in Amman. Peres’s driver had already started the car in order to leave for the Jordanian capital, but then, at the 11 th hour, Peres received a phone call from Netanyahu instructing him to remain in the President’s Residence, on the pretext that the time was not yet ripe to sign an agreement. Once again the same old Netanyahu was revealed, who shuns any chance of reaching an arrangement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Governments of Israel
    Governments of Israel Seventeenth Knesset: Government 31 Government 31 Government 31 To Government 31 - Current Members 04/05/2006 Ministers Faction** Prime Minister Ehud Olmert 04/05/2006 Kadima Vice Prime Minister Shimon Peres 04/05/2006- 13/06/2007 Kadima Haim Ramon 04/07/2007 Kadima Acting Prime Minister Tzipi Livni 04/05/2006 Kadima Deputy Prime Minister Shaul Mofaz 04/05/2006 Kadima Eliyahu Yishai 04/05/2006 Shas Labor- Amir Peretz 04/05/2006- 18/06/2007 Meimad Yisrael Avigdor Liberman 30/10/2006- 18/01/2008 Beitenu Ehud Barak 18/06/2007 Labor- Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development Shalom Simhon 04/05/2006 Meimad Minister of Communications Ariel Atias 04/05/2006 Shas Labor- Minister of Defense Amir Peretz 04/05/2006- 18/06/2007 Meimad Ehud Barak 18/06/2007 Labor- Minister of Education Yuli Tamir 04/05/2006 Meimad Minister of Environmental Protection Gideon Ezra 04/05/2006 Kadima Minister of Finance Abraham Hirchson 04/05/2006- 03/07/2007 Kadima Ronnie Bar-On 04/07/2007 Kadima Minister of Foreign Affairs Tzipi Livni 04/05/2006 Kadima Gil Minister of Health Yacov Ben Yizri 04/05/2006 Pensioners Party Minister of Housing and Construction Meir Sheetrit 04/05/2006- 04/07/2007 Kadima Ze`ev Boim 04/07/2007 Kadima Minister of Immigrant Absorption Ze`ev Boim 04/05/2006- 04/07/2007 Kadima Jacob Edery 04/07/2007- 14/07/2008 Kadima Eli Aflalo 14/07/2008 Kadima Minister of Industry, Trade, and Labor Eliyahu Yishai 04/05/2006 Shas Minister of Internal Affairs Ronnie Bar-On 04/05/2006- 04/07/2007 Kadima Meir Sheetrit 04/07/2007 Kadima
    [Show full text]
  • Kadima for Half Price? the Formation of a National Unity Government in Israel
    Israel Office_____________________________ Kadima for half price? The formation of a national unity government in Israel . The formation of a national unity government strengthens Prime Minister Netanyahu and gives him new leeway during negotiations. Kadima’s entry to the government strengthens moderate forces and weakens the hardliners. There will be no real change in policy. Kadima failed in opposition, and as a government party it will be even less able to push through a different policy. The agreement between Mofaz and Netanyahu was motivated in the main by domestic political reasons. This is the primary field in which moderate changes will take place rather than in foreign policy. There will be new Israeli offers of talks in the peace process, but no real progress should be expected, together with no surmounting of the present stalemate. It is not clear whether Mofaz will join the moderates or the hardliners in Netanyahu’s security cabinet over the Iran question. Dr. Ralf Hexel FES Israel, May 17, 2012 1 More political power for Netanyahu secure an influential ministerial position for himself? Or is he seeking a change in policy? In a surprise move on May 8, 2012, the opposi- tion Kadima party (28 seats), led by former No early elections - a national unity gov- army head and defense minister Shaul Mofaz, ernment instead joined prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right leaning-religious government coalition (66 When the Knesset convened on the morning of out of 120 seats). Netanyahu now has a gov- May 7, parliamentarians and public were abso- ernment comprising seven parties; this has a lutely sure that the votes needed to hold early parliamentary majority of 94 and can rightly be elections on September 4, 2012 and to dissolve called a national unity government.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and Relations with the United States
    Order Code RL33476 Israel: Background and Relations with the United States Updated July 6, 2007 Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Israel: Background and Relations with the United States Summary On May 14, 1948, the State of Israel declared its independence and was immediately engaged in a war with all of its neighbors. Armed conflict has marked every decade of Israel’s existence. Despite its unstable regional environment, Israel has developed a vibrant parliamentary democracy, albeit with relatively fragile governments. The Kadima Party placed first in the March 28, 2006, Knesset (parliament) election; Prime Minister Ehud Olmert formed a four-party coalition government, which another party has since joined. Israel has an advanced industrial, market economy in which the government plays a substantial role. Israel’s foreign policy is focused largely on its region, Europe, and the United States. The government views Iran as an existential threat due to its nuclear ambitions and support for anti-Israel terrorists. Israel concluded peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994 but never achieved accords with Syria and Lebanon. It negotiated a series of agreements with the Palestinians in the 1990s, but the Oslo peace process ended in 2000, with the Palestinian intifadah or uprising against Israeli occupation. Israeli and Palestinian officials accepted but have not implemented the “Roadmap,” the international framework for achieving a two-state solution to their conflict. Israel unilaterally disengaged from Gaza in summer 2005 and is constructing a security barrier in the West Bank to separate from the Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Netanyahu's Dilemma: Coalition Tug-Of-War | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 172 Netanyahu's Dilemma: Coalition Tug-of-War Jul 23, 1998 Brief Analysis ith the first high-level, direct talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority in 16 months reaching an W impasse just hours after they opened, pressures facing Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu are heating up. From Gaza come statements that Palestinians will talk only with Washington, which has already declared that the "ball is in Israel's court." From Washington come hints that U.S. mediation has reached its end, suggesting that Netanyahu will now have to vote "yea" or "nay" on the U.S. package deal to restart the Oslo interim process. But perhaps most important of all are the competing tugs on Netanyahu from his own coalition partners. Members of his own Likud party as well as from other parties that comprise his narrow coalition majority -- 61 out of 120 Knesset seats (see Knesset tally at end of article) -- have threatened to withdraw support if he does -- or, in some cases, if he does not -- complete a deal for the next phase of "further redeployment." In a process that has seen deadlines come and go over the years, the Knesset's adjournment date at the end of July is widely considered the final deadline for reaching an FRD agreement. > Predictions of the collapse of Netanyahu's coalition have been made since he first took office; the speculation that Netanyahu has now gotten himself into a bind he can't possibly survive sounds more familiar than convincing. Nevertheless, it is important to understand the various political ultimata Netanyahu faces as he approaches these final days of July.
    [Show full text]
  • מחלקת שפות זרות/FA & Defence/3953
    c. Method As proposed by the Chairman, the task was given to the Sub-Committee for Intelligence and the Secret Services, comprising six members of the Knesset. The members of the committee are: MK Yuval Steinitz – chair, MK Ehud Yatom, MK David Levy, MK Haim Ramon, MK Eli Yishai and MK Ilan Leibovitch. MK Danny Yatom, who was replaced in the course of the committee’s work as part of the rotation of members of the Labor faction in the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, also contributed to the work of the committee at the beginning. Mr. Shabtai Shavit – a former head of the Mossad - served as a consultant to the committee. The committee takes this opportunity to thank him for his significant contribution. The senior professional assistant of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, Colonel (res.) Shmuel Letko, served as the secretary of the committee. The work of the committee was closely accompanied by the incoming Director-General of the Committee, R. Admiral (res.) Avriel Bar-Joseph, and by the outgoing Director-General of the Committee, Mr. Baruch Friedner, who was also given the task of writing the report. The Committee began its work in July 2003 and completed it recently. The Committee held some 30 plenum sessions and scores of smaller work meetings, in the course of which the following, inter alia, appeared before it: The Prime Minister, Mr. Ariel Sharon The Minister of Defense, Mr. Shaul Mofaz The Deputy Minister of Defense, Mr. Zeev Boim The Chief-of-Staff, Lieutenant General Moshe (Boogy) Ya'alon The Head of Military Intelligence, Major-General Aharon (Farkash) Zeevi 13 The Head of the Mossad, Major-General (res.) Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIES UNDER a NEW ELECTORAL SYSTEM the Labor Party in the 1996 Israeli Elections
    06 – Torgovnik 4/1/00 12:11 pm Page 95 PARTY POLITICS VOL 6. No.1 pp. 95–106 Copyright © 2000 SAGE Publications London Thousand Oaks New Delhi RESEARCH NOTE STRATEGIES UNDER A NEW ELECTORAL SYSTEM The Labor Party in the 1996 Israeli elections Efraim Torgovnik ABSTRACT Structural systemic factors, including a tie between the two major political blocs in Israel and the change to direct election of the prime minister, generated an on-line personal campaign, making memory-based retrospective assessment of the positive past performance of Labor and its candidate, Shimon Peres, a lesser electoral issue. The direct elections for the prime minister overshadowed the party and its campaign. Concerns for personal security, raised during the campaign by terrorism, enhanced the electoral chances of the opposition Likud party and its candidate, Binyamin Netanyahu. Emotions became dominant in such symbolic-normative electoral dimensions as religious nationalism and fear. This was apparent in the success of the opposition candidate, Netanyahu, who was against the Oslo peace process, in entering the peace space by calling for a safe peace; he made peace a derivative of security. This undermined the key campaign position issue of incumbent Prime Minister Peres, which made security a derivative of peace. Emotions and terrorism contributed to a negative prospective voter assessment of the peace process and overshadowed retrospective dimensions of perform- ance, state of the economy and leadership. Analysis of campaign- generated issues indicates that election campaigns do make a difference. KEY WORDS n campaign strategies n electoral systems n Israel The 1996 Israeli national elections were held under a new and unique elec- toral rule: the prime minister was elected through personal elections in one 1354-0688(200001)6:1;95–106;011276 06 – Torgovnik 4/1/00 12:11 pm Page 96 PARTY POLITICS 6(1) national constituency while the parties ran in a national proportional rep- resentation system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Political Economy of Israel
    New Economy or Transnational Ownership? The Global Political Economy of Israel Shimshon Bichler, Haifa University Jonathan Nitzan, York University Paper presented at the international conference sponsored by The Canadian Centre for German and European Studies at York University The Regional Divide: Promises and Realities of the New Economy in a Transatlantic Perspective May 3-4, 2002, Toronto, Canada This paper is a slightly revised version of Chapter 6 in Jonathan Nitzan and Shimshon Bichler, The Global Political Economy of Israel (London: Pluto Press, forthcoming 2002). Please direct correspondence to: Jonathan Nitzan Political Science, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, Ontario, M3J-1P3, Canada email: [email protected] x voice (416) 736-2100, ext. 88822 x fax (416) 736-5686 NEW ECONOMY OR TRANSNATIONAL OWNERSHIP? 1 Table of Contents Introduction ... 2 Transnational Dominant Capital ... 3 Centralisation ... 3 Transnationalisation ... 5 Restructuring ... 7 The ‘Dependency’ ... 8 Zionist Donors-Investors ... 9 Corporate Cold Warriors ... 11 The Godfathers ... 14 The Autumn of the Patriarch ... 18 Toward Transnationalism ... 23 The Technodollar–Mergerdollar Coalition ... 23 Israel ‘Opens Up’ ... 25 The Brodet Report ... 26 The Principal Groups ... Taxes, Death and Bank Hapoalim ... 28 ‘Releasing Value’ ... 30 Mickey Mouse Takes Over Koor ... 31 The Recanatis Face the Raiders ... 33 The Big Asset Swap ... 35 ‘High Technology’ and Domestic Power ... 37 ‘New Economy’ or Leveraged Hype? ... 38 Newspapers and Criminals ... 40 The Russian Connection ... 43 The ‘Fishman State’? ... 50 The Politics of Communication Profits ... 54 Transnationalism and Israeli Technology ... 58 Why Invest in Israel? ... 59 Competition, Power and Waste ... 61 Israel’s Silicon Wady: The Big ‘Sale’ ... 64 End of the Road? ..
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Histadrut: an Apartheid Institution Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign Briefing Paper for Trade Unionists
    Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign Boycott Israel Briefing The Israeli Histadrut: an apartheid institution Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign briefing paper for trade unionists The Israeli pseudo-trade union, the Histadrut, is an active supporter of illegal occupation and dispossession of Palestinians. The Histadrut actively worked to defeat the Palestinian intifada (uprising) for freedom from illegal military occupation. The Histadrut’s construction company has been involved in massive construction programmes in the Occupied Territories. The Histadrut recruits illegal settlers while keeping out Palestinians; and endorses the denial of any basic human rights to Palestinian workers in sweatshops in zones under direct Israeli military control. CONTENTS: • Labour Zionism and the Histadrut are the real criminals • Driving Arabs out of jobs – a precursor to ethnic cleansing A Zionist poster from the 1930s • Opposition to trade union unity encourages settlers to buy only • watermelons that are produced in The Histadrut and the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian Jewish settlements. (Israel MFA) people • Histadrut and the Gaza massacre • Histadrut – a vital element of an apartheid state • Appendix 1: Draft resolution for union branches and committees • Appendix 2: Sawt el-Amel's Assessment of the Histadrut www.scottishpsc.org.uk [email protected] Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign c/o Peace & Justice Centre, Princes Street, Edinburgh, EH2 4BJ 0131 620 0052 www.scottishpsc.org.uk [email protected] Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign Boycott Israel Briefing The institutions of Labour Zionism, rather than its Revisionist competitors, have been the main driving force in the ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people during most of the lifetime of the Zionist colonisation of Palestine and the lifetime of the Israeli state.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Framework and the Case of the National Health Insurance Law in Israel
    1 סדרת מאמרים לדיון Working paper series No. 7 – 2011 Policy Entrepreneurs and the Design of Public Policy: Conceptual Framework and the Case of the National Health Insurance Law in Israel Nissim Cohen 142 מערכות מידע חשבונאיות ממוחשבות 1 Policy Entrepreneurs and the Design of Public Policy: Conceptual Framework and the Case of the National Health Insurance Law in Israel1 Nissim Cohen2 Abstract The main aim of this article is to suggest a theoretical conceptual framework to facilitate the description and explanation of the influence of policy entrepreneurs on the formulation and design of public policy. The analysis focuses on the behavior and political participation of players as a sort of human behavior which designs, directly or indirectly, a given social, collective reality. The conceptual framework uses theoretical tools of public policy and administration as well as new institutional approaches. In this context, the article defines policy entrepreneur, identifies the main characteristics of entrepreneurial activities, describes various strategies which the policy entrepreneur may employ, and characterizes a model of successful and effective policy entrepreneurship. The article emphasizes the importance of policy entrepreneurs in the public policy arena and suggests several insights regarding the conditions for their activity, their motivations and main strategies. The theoretical framework and main insights regarding the processes of institutional change in public policy are used in the analysis of the design of the Israel National Health Law of 1994 as a case study. KEY WORDS: policy entrepreneurship, policy change, health care policy, reform, institutional change. 1 Draft only, ongoing work: Please do not cite or circulate without permission of the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and Relations with the United States
    Order Code RL33476 Israel: Background and Relations with the United States Updated December 31, 2007 Carol Migdalovitz Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Israel: Background and Relations with the United States Summary On May 14, 1948, the State of Israel declared its independence and was immediately engaged in a war with all of its neighbors. Armed conflict has marked every decade of Israel’s existence. Despite its unstable regional environment, Israel has developed a vibrant parliamentary democracy, albeit with relatively fragile governments. The Kadima Party placed first in the March 28, 2006, Knesset (parliament) election; Prime Minister Ehud Olmert formed a coalition government. Israel has an advanced industrial, market economy with a large government role. Israel’s foreign policy is focused largely on its region, Europe, and the United States. It views Iran as an existential threat due to its nuclear ambitions and support for anti-Israel terrorists. Israel concluded peace treaties with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, but never achieved accords with Syria and Lebanon. Israel unilaterally withdrew from southern Lebanon in 2000. Hezbollah sparked a 34-day war when it kidnaped two Israeli soldiers in July 12, 2006. Israel negotiated a series of agreements with the Palestinians in the 1990s, but that process ended in 2000. In 2003, Israeli and Palestinian officials accepted the “Road Map,” an international framework for achieving a two-state solution to their conflict, but never implemented it. Israel unilaterally disengaged from the Gaza Strip in 2005 and is constructing a security barrier in the West Bank to separate from the Palestinians.
    [Show full text]
  • Revival Volume3 Issue 1.Indd
    Published by the Israeli Labor Party © 2006, all rights reserved Subscriptions, enquiries, and feedback: [email protected] Editorial committee: Colette Avital MK, Guy Spigelman (Editor), Marcus Sheff February 2006 Volume 3 REVIVAL Issue 1 The English News Magazine of the Israeli Labor Party General Elections on March 28 Amir Peretz: Only Labor will bring Peace and Social Justice “Israel is at one of the most important moments in its history, a moment that will define its future. Unfortunately, over the years, many have known how to diagnose the strategic threats facing Israel, and suggest merely tactical measures, which do not offer an overall solution to the ills of Israeli society. I intend to act differently, and offer the Israeli public a complete moral road map that includes Party Chairman Amir Peretz with King Mohammed VI of Morocco at a recent a political chapter and a social-economic meeting in Fez. The two discussed chapter, which will guide the entirety of the regional developments and Morocco’s political and economic measures I propose. role in the peace process. The chapters are interconnected because there will be no peace without social justice and there will be no social justice without progress in the peace process.” Party Chairman Amir Peretz at the Herzliya Conference on the Balance of Israel’s National Security, 24th January 2006 Election Special Guy Spigelman on the upcoming campaign.................................... page 2 Speech by Party Leader Peretz to SI Council in Athens................. page 3 Ephraim Sneh on the challenge posed by Hamas ......................... page 4 Labor’s candidates for the 17th Knesset........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Herzliya Conference February 2-4, 2009 Policy, Statecraft and Leadership for Trying Times
    on the Balance of Israel’s National Security Conference Conclusions The Ninth Herzliya Conference February 2-4, 2009 Policy, Statecraft and Leadership for Trying Times Institute for Policy and Strategy Lauder School of Government, Diplomacy & Strategy The Interdisciplinary Center (IDC) Herzliya Table Of Contents 1 About the Herzliya Conference 9 Conference Conclusions 10 Preface 12 Strategic Trends for Israel 17 The World Order: A Multiple-Crisis Global Arena 26 The Middle East: Regional Issues and Key Players 31 Israel’s Global and Regional Security and Political Challenges 39 Israel and Jewish Peoplehood: Reinforcing the National Resilience 41 Israel in the Global Era: Challenges at Home 49 Conference Program 54 About IDC & IPS 57 Conference Participants 66 Acknowledgments About the Herzliya Conference 1 HERZLIYA | 2009 Israel’s premier global policy gathering, the Herzliya Conference exclusively draws together international and Israeli participants from the highest levels of government, business and academia to address the most pressing national, regional and global issues. The Conference offers leaders timely and authoritative assessments and policy recommendations needed to guide their organizations through the challenging geopolitical, economic and social developments. Harnessing path-breaking methodologies, the Conference’s task force reports and the commissioned studies present an accurate, coherent, continuous and comprehensive picture of the region and the world. Strategic and political processes and events emanating from an ever-turbulent Middle East increasingly impact the global arena. Shaping the regional and international policy debates and directly influencing decision-making, the deliberations at Herzliya cover a broad span of issues, ranging from nuclear proliferation and the Middle East peace process to world finance, energy security and global warming.
    [Show full text]