DOCSLIB.ORG

Lower Provo River Ecosystem Flow Recommendations Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lower Provo River Ecosystem Flow Recommendations Final Report LOWER PROVO RIVER ECOSYSTEM FLOW RECOMMENDATIONS FINAL REPORT September 2008 Prepared by: Melissa Stamp and Darren Olsen, BIO-WEST, Inc; Tyler Allred, Allred Restoration, Inc. Submitted to: Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission 230 South 500 East, Suite 230 Salt Lake City, Utah 84102-2045 Submitted by: BIO-WEST, Inc. 1063 West 1400 North Logan, UT 84321-2291 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BIO-WEST, Inc., would like to thank Mark Holden and Maureen Wilson (Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission), Marianne Crawford (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), and Michael Mills (Central Utah Water Conservancy District) for their input into this report. We would also like to acknowledge Christopher Keleher (Utah Department of Natural Resources), whose previous work formed the basis for the recommendations in this report, as well as the many other parties whose guidance, insight, spirit of cooperation, and past efforts have added greatly to the value of this report. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................... 2 Background......................................................................................................................... 2 SECTION 2. HYDROLOGIC ALTERATIONS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON FLOW- DEPENDENT ECOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS ................................................... 5 Ecological Importance of Instream Flows .......................................................................... 6 Individual Ecological Functions ......................................................................................... 8 Hydrology ............................................................................................................... 8 Geomorphology ...................................................................................................... 8 Water Quality.......................................................................................................... 9 Aquatic Biology...................................................................................................... 9 Riparian Biology................................................................................................... 10 SECTION 3. IDEALIZED GENERAL APPROACH TO INSTREAM FLOW RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................... 12 SECTION 4. METHODS FOR DETERMINING INSTREAM FLOWS............................... 14 Base Flow/Minimum Flow Setting Techniques ............................................................... 14 Hydraulic Modeling (Incremental) Techniques................................................................ 14 Spawning Flow Determination Techniques...................................................................... 19 Channel Maintenance and Flushing Flow Determination Techniques............................. 19 Riparian Vegetation Techniques....................................................................................... 23 Hydrologic Variability Assessment Techniques............................................................... 24 SECTION 5. APPROACH TO INSTREAM FLOW RECOMMENDATIONS, LOWER PROVO RIVER................................................................................................. 25 Study Area/Watershed Overview ..................................................................................... 25 Existing Conditions........................................................................................................... 25 Hydrology ............................................................................................................. 25 Geomorphology .................................................................................................... 28 Water Quality........................................................................................................ 29 Riparian Vegetation .............................................................................................. 30 Fisheries ................................................................................................................ 30 June Sucker ........................................................................................................... 31 Macroinvertebrates ............................................................................................... 35 Lower Provo River Instream Flow Recommendations Framework ................................. 36 BIO-WEST, Inc. i Lower Provo River Flow Recommendations September 2008 Final Report SECTION 6. AVAILABLE LOWER PROVO RIVER DATA SETS RELEVANT TO INSTREAM FLOWS .................................................................................. 40 Hydrologic Data................................................................................................................ 40 Geomorphic/Hydraulic Data............................................................................................. 41 Biological/Habitat Data .................................................................................................... 41 Riparian Vegetation Data.................................................................................................. 42 Water Quality Data ........................................................................................................... 42 SECTION 7. INSTREAM FLOW DETERMINATION METHODS/DATA FOR LOWER PROVO RIVER RIVERINE COMPONENTS ......................... 44 SECTION 8. LOWER PROVO RIVER INSTREAM FLOW RECOMMENDATIONS....... 53 Summary of Existing Instream Flow Requirements and Procedures ............................... 53 Base Flow Guidelines ....................................................................................................... 54 Winter Base Flows................................................................................................ 54 Summer Base Flows ............................................................................................. 55 Autumn Base Flows.............................................................................................. 56 A Note Regarding Variability............................................................................... 56 March and July Considerations............................................................................. 56 Spring Runoff Recommendations..................................................................................... 57 Operational Considerations............................................................................................... 60 SECTION 9. REFERENCES...................................................................................................... 64 APPENDIX A: DIMENSIONLESS FLOW-DURATION CURVE ANALYSIS APPENDIX B: ANALYSIS OF NATURAL SPRING HYDROGRAPH CHARACTERISTICS APPENDIX C: FLUSHING FLOW, EFFECTIVE DISCHARGE, AND CHANNEL-CHANGING FLOWS IN THE LOWER PROVO RIVER APPENDIX D: SUMMARY OF HYDRAULIC HABITAT NICHE RESULTS APPENDIX E: SUMMARY OF JUNE SUCKER SPAWNING AND LARVAL-DRIFT MONITORING RESULTS APPENDIX F: WETTED PERIMETER INFLECTION-POINT ANALYSIS APPENDIX G: ANALYSIS OF SUMMERTIME WATER TEMPERATURE AND STREAMFLOW APPENDIX H: PLOTS OF NATURALIZED PROVO RIVER AT HAILSTONE FLOWS VERSUS EXISTING TARGET HYDROGRAPHS APPENDIX I: PLOTS OF ACTUAL LOWER PROVO RIVER FLOWS VERSUS EXISTING TARGET HYDROGRAPHS BIO-WEST, Inc. ii Lower Provo River Flow Recommendations September 2008 Final Report LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1. General types of riverine processes and ecological functions supported by instream flows. ..................................................................................................... 13 Table 4.1. Comparison of techniques for setting base flows/minimum instream flows (based on descriptions in Annear et al. 2004; for complete methodology reference information see Annear et al. 2004). ......................................................... 15 Table 4.2. Comparison of hydraulic-modeling/incremental methods (based on descriptions in Annear et al. 2004)................................................................................................ 17 Table 4.3. Comparison of spawning-flow methods (based on descriptions in Annear et al. 2004).......................................................................................................................... 20 Table 4.4. Comparison of channel-maintenance and flushing-flow methods (based on descriptions in Annear et al. 2004)....................................................................... 21 Table 4.5. Comparison of riparian vegetation flow-determination methods (based partly on descriptions in Annear et al. 2004)....................................................................... 23 Table 4.6. Comparison of hydrologic-variability methods (based partly on descriptions in Annear et al. 2004)................................................................................................ 24 Table 5.1. Summary of annual June sucker stocking efforts. ..................................................... 32 Table 5.2. June sucker life history stages supported by instream flows. ................................... 36 Table 5.3. Ecological functions supported by instream flows and their relative priority on the lower Provo River under existing (2008) conditions. .................................... 37 Table 7.1. Instream flow determination methods
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Provo River Watershed Plan Introduction Public Water Systems
    Provo River Watershed Plan Introduction Public water systems (PWSs) in the State of Utah who treat surface water or groundwater under the direct influence of surface water are required by the Drinking Water Source Protection (DWSP) Rule, to develop, submit and implement a DWSP Plan for all sources of public drinking water. All PWSs are required to delineate watershed protection zones, develop a listing of potential contamination sources within the protection zones, and subsequently prepare and implement management plans to provide protection for surface water sources within the watershed protection zones. The following PWSs along the Wasatch Front have formed the Watershed Protection Coalition (Coalition) and have initiated a cooperative project to develop their DWSP Plans for the Provo River Basin Watershed: Central Utah Water Conservancy District Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy The mission of the Watershed Protection Coalition is to: Work cooperatively to understand the watershed, identify priorities, and develop and implement long-term strategies to protect the drinking water source(s) from contamination, as a primary safeguard to protect the public health. Support federal, state and local agencies that are empowered with the authority and jurisdiction necessary to protect the watershed(s) and drinking water source(s) through regulations, rules and ordinances. The members of the Coalition, all of whom are active signing and funding members of the Provo River Watershed Council (PRWC), are working together to protect regional surface water resources. By working together in cooperation with other agencies and programs, the Coalition is able to maximize efficiency, and jointly manage potential contamination sources.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority
    GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority: Wasatch County Instructions: In the cells below, please provide an answer/description for each question. PLEASE CHANGE THE COLOR OF SUBSTANTIVE NEW LANGUAGE INCLUDED IN YOUR PLAN THIS YEAR! 1) Access & Eligibility for Mental Health and/or Substance Abuse Clients Who is eligible to receive mental health services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Wasatch County Family Clinic-Wasatch Behavioral Health Special Service District (WCFC-WMH) is a comprehensive community mental health center providing mental health and substance use disorder services to the residents of Wasatch County. WCFC-WBH provides a mental health and Substance Use screening to any Wasatch County resident requesting services. Based on available resources, (funding or otherwise), prospective clients will be referred to or linked with available resources. Medicaid eligible clients will be provided access to the full array of services available. Individuals who carry commercial insurance will be seen as their benefits allow. Clients with no funding may be seen on a sliding fee scale. Who is eligible to receive substance abuse services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Identify how you manage wait lists. How do you ensure priority populations get served? WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services to residents of Wasatch County. Medicaid and commercial insurances are also accepted and services are provided as benefits allow. WCFC-WBH provides substance abuse services as funding allows those without insurance or ability to pay. A sliding fee scale is available for these clients. Clients accepted into the drug court also have all services available and fees are also set based on the sliding scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Reclamation Mitigation & Conservation Commission FY2016
    UTAH RECLAMATION MITIGATION & CONSERVATION COMMISSION FY2016-2018 Report Introduction Contents Welcome to the FY2016-2018 Report of the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission (Mitigation Meet the Mitigation Commission ........... Page 1 Commission). The Mitigation Commission was authorized and established by Congress and the President in 1992 through the Program Elements Map ........................ Page 2-3 Central Utah Project Completion Act (CUPCA; Titles II through VI Lower Provo River/Utah Lake.................. Page 4 of Public Law 102-575). The Mitigation Commission’s primary responsibility is to plan, coordinate and fund programs to mitigate Middle and Upper Provo River ............... Page 6 for adverse effects of the Bonneville Unit of the Central Utah Diamond Fork Watershed ....................... Page 8 Project on fish, wildlife and related recreation resources in Utah. This report highlights Mitigation Commission accomplishments for Strawberry/Duchesne Watershed ........ Page 12 fiscal years 2016 through 2018, and describes the effectiveness of Great Salt Lake/Jordan River ............... Page 14 those actions toward achieving CUPCA requirements. It also identifies actions planned for the foreseeable future and Statewide ................................................ Page 16 potential revisions to our Mitigation and Conservation Plan. In our Office ............................................ Page 17 By design, the Mitigation Commission’s program relies on FY2016-2018 Financial Report ............... Page 17 partnerships with the larger natural resource community. The Mitigation Commission forms partnerships with natural resource Our Partners ...................................... back cover agencies, State and local governments, Indian tribes, universities and non-profit organizations, to carry out its many projects in a coordinated and cooperative manner. Therefore, throughout this report, the term “we” is intended to include the many partners essential to moving Mitigation Commission projects forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasatch Mental Health
    GOVERNANCE & OVERSIGHT NARRATIVE Local Authority: Wasatch Behavioral Health Special Service District Instructions: In the cells below, please provide an answer/description for each question. PLEASE CHANGE THE COLOR OF SUBSTANTIVE NEW LANGUAGE INCLUDED IN YOUR PLAN THIS YEAR! 1) Access & Eligibility for Mental Health and/or Substance Abuse Clients Who is eligible to receive mental health services within your catchment area? What services (are there different services available depending on funding)? Wasatch Behavioral Health Special Service District (WBH) is a comprehensive community mental health and substance use disorder center providing a full array of mental health and substance use disorder services to the residents of Utah County. WBH provides a mental health and substance use disorder screening to any Utah County resident in need for mental health and substance use disorder services. The screening is to assess the level of care and appropriate services either through WBH or a referral to the appropriate outside provider/agency. Based on available resources, (funding or otherwise), prospective clients will be referred to or linked with available resources. Medicaid eligible clients will be provided access to the full array of services available. Individuals who carry commercial insurance will be referred to appropriate providers in the community or referred to one of the many programs within WBH for treatment based on eligibility. Additionally, WBH has several specialized programs, including a specialized program for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders, treatment for adjudicated youth sex offenders, residential and youth receiving services, individuals who are homeless, clients who are treated by the mental health court or drug court, and other services for members of the community who are unable to afford treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • 6-Public Comments April May 2020 Re Provo River Trail
    Date received Name Representing Comment Additional comment April 28, 2020 Brad Tanner I support the the expansion of the Provo Trail beyond Vivian Park. April 28, 2020 Austin Taylor Transportation Commission Members I am emailing to voice my support for the expansion of the Provo River Trail at $6.1 million. These trying times have shown us how important trails are to the mental and physical health of our communities. The Murdock Canal Trail in Utah County has seen an increase of 80% in ridership compared to this time last year because people need outdoor activity to stay healthy. This expansion will give people an opportunity to explore more of nature and improve their physical and mental health. It may also benefit the economies of the Provo and Heber City areas as people ride bikes between the two areas to shop, dine, and recreate. I do this with my wife on bike tours through Provo Canyon but we are crazy and willing to take a risk riding on the highway. Lastly, this project will enhance safety for cyclists on the route. People are currently biking on the debris-filled shoulders of a 55mph highway with 17,000 trips per day. While some road cyclists choose to take the risks, the vast majority of people who bike avoid it. Expanding the river trail would make riding in this area safer and expand this opportunity to more people. -- Austin Taylor April 28, 2020 Doug Smith Wasatch To Whom It May Concern, County Planning I am writing this e-mail in support of the funding for the Provo Canyon Trail from Vivian Park to the Deer Creek Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Weber Marion Kamas Francis Woodland Uinta Mountains Peoa
    Kamas Driving Guide 2008 3/17/08 9:34 AM Page 1 10 19. Duchesne Tunnel. Built 1940 - 1952. 32 Upper Weber This 6 mile tunnel brings water from the 7. Smith and Morehouse Reservoir. Campground, Duchesne River to the Provo River. Milepost 18, Hwy 150. Closed in winter. 300 North boat ramp, picnic area, mountain access. 12 miles from Oakley. Hwy 213. 20. Uinta Falls. Milepost 12.6, Hwy 150. Closed in winter. 200 North Kamas 8. Holiday Park. The Headwaters of the 21. Trial Lake High Mountain Dams, & John est 100 North Weber River. Grix Cabin. Lakes built with pack animals W and 2-wheeled carts between 1910 & 1940. 200 Center St. Cabin built 1922 - 1925 during 11 The valley’s elevation made 32 100 South expansion of Trial Lake. Closed in winter. 12 Marion farming difficult, but the 31 22. Bald Mountain Pass. High point (10,678 ft). 200 South 150 248 To Uintas 9. Original LDS Church. towns soon found a cash crop Blazzard Lumber in Kamas 30 Views into the Uinta Wilderness and of Bald est 300 South Built 1910-1914. Now Mt. (11,947) Hayden Peak (12,473), Mt in timber. Great forest of pine covered the mountains Cover photo: Janet Thimmes “Traffic on Main Street in Kamas” W 24 Kamas Valley Co-op. Agassiz (12,429). Milepost 29•B, Hwy 150. and canyons above the towns. Timber camps were 100 400 South Note the arched windows. Closed in winter. erected near the headwaters of Beaver Creek, the Provo Milepost 15.9, Hwy 32.
    [Show full text]
  • Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Is Where Civilization Meets the “Wild.” Metropolitan Areas and Get to Know Us
    inta-Wasatch-Cache NATIONAL FOREST U VISITOR GUIDE The Forest Next Door Logan River (© Mike Norton) Nebo Loop Road (© Willie Holdman) What’s Inside he Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest is where civilization meets the “wild.” Metropolitan areas and Get»to»Know»Us»......................... 2 Tcommunities bordering the forest make up some of the Special»Places»...........................3 fastest growing areas in the Intermountain West. Quick, Scenic»Byways»&»Backways»......4 convenient access is available to forest visitors year-round, Wilderness».................................6 Activities».................................... 8 making the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache an intensely used Hiking».......................................»10 destination spanning backyard to backcountry. Roads and Winter»Recreation....................»12 trails lead visitors to natural settings and spectacular vistas Flora»&»Fauna»..........................»14 with fresh water and clean air. Know»Before»You»Go.................16 Campgrounds»&»Picnic»Areas...18 In winter, the “Greatest Snow on Fast Forest Facts Maps»........................................»24 Earth” draws people from around Contact»Information»................»28 »» Size:»2.1»million»acres,»from» the world. desert»to»high»mountain»peaks.» »» The»oldest»exposed»rocks»in»Utah» can»be»seen»in»outcrops»near»the» mouth»of»Farmington»Canyon.» orest lands have sustained local communities »» The»Jardine»Juniper»tree»is»over» for thousands of years. We recognize our role in 1,500»years»old»and»is»one»of»the» F finding balance and maintaining relevance, while oldest»living»trees»in»the»Rocky» Mountains. providing sustainable recreation for a diverse and growing population. This Visitor Guide provides the information you need to make the most of your Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest experience. G et to Know Us History s “The Forest Next Door,” the Uinta-Wasatch- y the1890s many of the range and timber resources of ACache National Forest has long been sought after for its Bthe Uinta and Wasatch Mountains were seriously depleted.
    [Show full text]
  • Block Notice 7A-2 Temporary Use in North Utah County Draft Environmental Assessment
    Block Notice 7A-2 Temporary Use in North Utah County Draft Environmental Assessment June 2021 Joint Lead Agencies U.S. Department of the Interior, Central Utah Project Completion Act Office Central Utah Water Conservancy District Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission Cooperating Agency U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Responsible Officials Reed R. Murray U.S. Department of the Interior, CUPCA Office 302 East Lakeview Pkwy Provo, Utah 84606‐7317 Gene Shawcroft Central Utah Water Conservancy District 1426 East 750 North, Suite 400 Orem, Utah 84097‐5474 Mark Holden Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission 230 South 500 East, Suite 230 Salt Lake City, Utah 84102‐2045 For information, contact: Chris Elison Central Utah Water Conservancy District 1426 East 750 North, Suite 400 Orem, Utah 84097‐5474 (801) 226‐7166 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures and Tables ................................................................................................................ iv Abbreviations and Acronyms ........................................................................................................... v Chapter 1: Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Overview of the North Union Canal
    Historical Overview of the North Union Canal By Sheri Murray Ellis Certus Environmental Solutions October 2019 INTRODUCTION The North Union Canal is a more than 9-mile long irrigation canal located in the communities of Orem, Lindon, and Pleasant Grove in Utah County, Utah. The canal begins at a diversion on the Provo Bench Canal (sometimes referred to as the Big Bench Canal), which draws water from the Provo River near the mouth of Provo Canyon and travels southwest to 1000 East and Palisade Drive in Orem to a diversion structure.1 The North Union Canal begins at this diversion, crossing through the community of Lindon and continuing north into Pleasant Grove (see Figure 1). The Provo Bench Irrigation Company operates and maintains the Provo Bench Canal from the diversion on the river to 800 North in Orem. The North Union Irrigation Company manages the canal north of that point.2 The North Union Canal was constructed during the historical period and was documented first as an archaeological resource in 2006 and assigned the Smithsonian trinomial site number 42UT1333. In 2018, the Lindon City received a federal WaterSMART grant from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) to pipe portions of the open canal channel in their community. The piping project was subject to review under the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations at 36 CFR 800. During this review, which included consultation between the BOR and the Utah State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), the canal was determined to be eligible for the National Register of Historic Places as a historical site, and the proposed piping of segments of the open channel was determined to have an adverse effect on the site.
    [Show full text]
  • 6-May 2020 Public Comments
    Date received Name Representing Comment Additional comment April 28, 2020 Brad Tanner I support the the expansion of the Provo Trail beyond Vivian Park. April 28, 2020 Austin Taylor Transportation Commission Members I am emailing to voice my support for the expansion of the Provo River Trail at $6.1 million. These trying times have shown us how important trails are to the mental and physical health of our communities. The Murdock Canal Trail in Utah County has seen an increase of 80% in ridership compared to this time last year because people need outdoor activity to stay healthy. This expansion will give people an opportunity to explore more of nature and improve their physical and mental health. It may also benefit the economies of the Provo and Heber City areas as people ride bikes between the two areas to shop, dine, and recreate. I do this with my wife on bike tours through Provo Canyon but we are crazy and willing to take a risk riding on the highway. Lastly, this project will enhance safety for cyclists on the route. People are currently biking on the debris-filled shoulders of a 55mph highway with 17,000 trips per day. While some road cyclists choose to take the risks, the vast majority of people who bike avoid it. Expanding the river trail would make riding in this area safer and expand this opportunity to more people. -- Austin Taylor April 28, 2020 Doug Smith Wasatch To Whom It May Concern, County Planning I am writing this e-mail in support of the funding for the Provo Canyon Trail from Vivian Park to the Deer Creek Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Preparedness Safety Awareness
    Wasatch Mental Health Emergency Preparedness and Safety Awareness Reference Manual Important Phone Numbers Community Resources Response Flowchart Emergency Alert System Medical Emergencies Evacuation Hazardous Chemical Emergencies Fire Emergencies Vehicle Accidents Office/Workplace Safety Threat of Violence Weather Emergencies Earthquake Preparation Other Agency Information The Wasatch Mental Health Emergency Preparedness and Safety Awareness Plan establishes, coordinates, and outlines the operating procedure in the event of an emergency or a disaster, either internal or external. In addition the plan promotes safety awareness to help prevent accidents, illness and injuries and establishes safety responsibilities for staff members and clients. Emergencies, disasters, accidents, injuries and crime can occur without warning at any time. It is important to be prepared for all different types of emergencies and know the right protocols to follow if incidents were to occur to ensure the safety of all staff members and clients. Wasatch Mental Health developed this manual to assist you in minimizing the negative effects from such events. Please read this manual thoroughly before an emergency occurs. Become acquainted with the contents and keep it for immediate reference. A copy of this manual will be made available in the employees section of the center’s website. Contents Emergency/Disaster Procedures and Important Phone Numbers .............................. 1 Wasatch Mental Health Program Manager Phone List ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1/10/2012 Internship Agreement Log3 Page 1 ID Employer Dept Rec'd 1644
    Internship Agreement Log3 1/10/2012 ID Employer Dept Rec'd 1644 (Preferred Family Clinic) Randy Hyde Psych 11/1/1999 1649 (Sierra Counseling) Jon B. Skidmore, PsyD Psych 11/1/1999 2702 @ Home Realty Network Comm 5/17/2002 4218 1280 KZNS Comms 11/16/2004 3413 1-800-Patches Comm 8/18/2003 2745 2by2.net Business 6/5/2002 659 39 West, Inc. Marriott 5/23/1997 3953 3rd Degree Entertainment Comms 7/7/2004 2229 4 the Young, Inc. 2/22/2001 1791 47th Services Division, Family Member Support Fligh RMYL 3/24/2000 t (USAF) 1759 A Better Way TECM 6/5/2000 2905 A Place for Mom Comm 9/19/2002 1779 A. Crowell & Assoc. Health 3/8/2000 2794 AARP Health 7/25/2002 3236 ABA Section of Individual Rights & Responsibilities Law 5/27/2003 730 ABC News - 20/20 Comm 1/30/1997 1832 ABC News–Stossel Unit Comm 7/18/2000 436 ABC PrimeTime Live n/a 8/1/1996 3344 ABC Radio Disney AM 910 Comm 7/2/2003 433 ABC World News Tonight n/a 8/1/1996 474 ACCESS n/a 10/24/1996 702 ACCESS Data Corporation Marriott 6/25/1997 1833 Access DR n/a 7/17/2000 2076 ACCESS DR Health 7/10/2000 2075 Accomack County Public Schools TeachEd 11/6/2000 397 ACLU n/a 7/16/1996 2756 ACLU Women‘s Law 8/1/2002 2938 Action Against Poverty Network Marriott 10/25/2002 3163 Action Whitewater Adventures PE 4/29/2003 Page 1 Internship Agreement Log3 1/10/2012 ID Employer Dept Rec'd 3355 Actions Inc.
    [Show full text]