DOCSLIB.ORG

Gravesham Borough Council 3Mm Bleed Application Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gravesham Borough Council 3Mm Bleed Application Documents west village bluewater outline planning application december 2012 retail impact assessment Gravesham Borough Council 3mm Bleed application documents 1.0 Outline Application Form 2.0 Design and Access Statement 3.0 Development Specification and Framework 4.0 Planning Statement 5.0 Retail Impact Assessment 6.0 Economic Statement 7.0 Air Quality Assessment 8.0 Flood Risk Assessment 9.0 Ecological Assessment 10.0 Transport Assessment 11.0 Transport Assessment Appendices 12.0 Sustainability and Energy Strategy 13.0 Statement of Community Involvement 14.0 Utilities Statement 15.0 Preliminary Environmental Risk Assessment Front Inside 211 x 301 Gravesham Borough Council contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Site and Surrounding Area 5 2.1 Site Description and the Bluewater Concept 5 2.2 Relevant Planning History 5 3 Development Proposals 6 3.1 Introduction 6 3.2 The Proposals 6 4 Planning Policy Context 8 4.1 National Planning Policy 8 4.2 Local Planning Policy 9 4.3 Summary 13 5 Retail Context 14 5.1 Introduction 14 5.2 Scope of Assessment 14 5.3 Study Area 14 5.4 Role of Centres 15 5.5 Effect on Commitments in Context 16 5.6 Summary of Health Checks 17 6 Household Survey: Shopping Patterns 19 6.1 Introduction 19 6.2 Survey Structure 19 6.3 Patterns of Expenditure Flows 21 6.4 Bluewater 22 7 Assessment of Proposals 25 7.1 Effects of Bluewater in Context 25 7.2 Capacity Analysis 25 7.3 Effects on Trade/Turnover 27 7.4 Cumulative Effect of Proposals and Commitments 37 7.5 Effect on Investment within the Catchment 39 7.6 Effect on Town Centre Vitality and Viability 42 7.7 Impact on Local Consumer Choice 42 7.8 Summary 43 8 Conclusions 44 Gravesham Borough Council page 2 | Retail Impact Assessment appendices appendix 1: Catchment Plan appendix 2: Centre Health Checks appendix 3: Retail Assessment scoping note and response appendix 4: Household Survey Zones Plan appendix 4a: Households Survey Postal Codes appendix 5: Quantitative Analysis appendix 6: Household Survey Questions Gravesham Borough Council Retail Impact Assessment | page 3 1 Introduction 1.1 This Retail Impact Assessment has been prepared by Quod in support of an outline planning application by Blueco Ltd., the owners of Bluewater (the ‘Applicants’) for the redevelopment of and an extension to the West Village at Bluewater. The Applicant proposes to redevelop and extend the existing West Village to improve and complement the range of existing shopping and catering facilities at Bluewater by a maximum net increase of circa 30,500sqm comparison retail floorspace (A1-A5) gross internal area (gross internal area). This outline planning application seeks planning permission for the following: “Redevelopment of the site through part demolition, alteration and refurbishment of existing buildings/structures and erection of new buildings/structures to provide retail and related uses (A1-A5), new basement servicing corridor, reconfiguration of existing car and coach parking areas, reconfiguration of existing lake, open space and public realm, alteration of existing pedestrian links within the site, amended vehicular link into existing transit centre infrastructure and associated facilities.” 1.2 This report has been provided to assist Dartford Borough Council in the determination of the planning application, and considers the retail justification for, and implications of, the proposed development. Its scope has been agreed with Dartford Borough Council. 1.3 In March 2012, the Government published the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which supersedes previous national planning guidance on retail matters. The NPPF established a presumption in favour of sustainable development as the golden thread running through both the plan making and decision taking processes. Local Planning Authorities are required to attach significant weight to the need to support economic growth through the planning system, whilst promoting competitive town centre environments. This submission is made in accordance with these principles. 1.4 Policy CS12 of the Dartford Core Strategy (2011) states that planning consent will be granted for development that supports the role of Bluewater as a ‘specialist comparison shopping centre’ and that proposals exceeding the guidance levels (up to 5,000sqm to 2016) will be subject to retail assessment carried out in consultation with neighbouring authorities and taking into account the likely impact of the scheme on neighbouring town centres and regional considerations. In accordance with paragraph 3.3.1 of the Dartford Core Strategy, the guidance levels reflect the element of local expenditure growth that can sustainably be accommodated at Bluewater. The Core Strategy recognises that proposals exceeding the guidance levels may be submitted which will need to be assessed through a retail assessment. 1.5 Paragraph 26 of the NPPF requires planning applications for retail development over 2,500m² (in the absence of locally established thresholds), not in an existing centre and not in accordance with an up to date development plan to be accompanied by an assessment addressing the impact of the proposals on existing, committed and planned public and private investment; town centre vitality and viability; and local consumer choice and trade. In this case, the proposals are in accordance with an up-to-date Local Plan, but an Impact Assessment has been carried out, as required by local policy. 1.6 The application site is designated as a ‘specialist comparison shopping centre’ within the Dartford Core Strategy, forming an important part of a network of centres within the borough. Accordingly, a sequential assessment is not required under Paragraph 24 of the NPPF as the application is within an existing centre. Notwithstanding this, given the specific locational requirements of the proposals, the floorspace proposed addresses a particular need at Bluewater, which could not be met by providing the floorspace elsewhere. 1.7 Accordingly, the structure of this report is as follows: • SectionGravesham 2: details the site and surrounding Borough area; Council • Section 3: provides a description of the development, along with headline commentary on key elements of the scheme; • Section 4: summarises the relevant retail planning policies at a national, regional and local level, in order to provide a context for the determination of the application; • Section 5: sets out the retail context to the proposals; page 4 | Retail Impact Assessment • Section 6: considers existing trading patterns in and around the catchment ; • Section 7: provides an analysis of the effect of the proposals on existing centres; and • Section 8: provides conclusions. 1.8 It is generally accepted that major shopping centres contain a small element of convenience floorspace that complements the comparison provision, and Bluewater is no exception to this. However, no further convenience floorspace is proposed in this application and this assessment therefore relates to comparison retail floorspace only. 1.9 Following analysis in the subsequent chapters, it is considered that the proposals do not result in any significant harm by way of impact on town centres, nor to committed and planned public and private investment across the study period. In addition, there are material gains arising out of the proposal both in terms of the local economy and improved consumer choice that will benefit Bluewater, the Borough of Dartford, and the wider catchment. 1.10 This Retail Impact Assessment should be read in conjunction with the Planning Statement and other application documentation submitted in support of the proposals. Gravesham Borough Council Retail Impact Assessment | page 5 2 Site and Surrounding Area 2.1 Site Description and the Bluewater Concept 2.1.1 Bluewater is located in Greenhithe, within the Borough of Dartford. It is situated approximately one mile east of the M25, between Dartford and Gravesend. The site is bounded to its south by the A296, the B255 to its east and the A226 to the north. The location of Bluewater within the catchment area of this assessment is shown at Appendix 1. 2.1.2 Bluewater is one of the UK’s largest retail and leisure complexes, containing over 330 shops and restaurants. The centre comprises a triangular circuit, with an anchor department store at each corner – John Lewis, Marks & Spencer and House of Fraser. Each is connected by three distinct shopping malls, namely The Guildhall, The Rose Gallery and Thames Walk. 2.1.3 In addition to the retail facilities, Bluewater provides leisure, entertainment and recreational facilities that are an integral component of the Bluewater experience. Three ‘leisure villages’ provide a break out from the principal retail environment. These include The Wintergarden, The West Village and The Water Circus. The latter includes the more recently developed ‘Glow’ and The Plaza complemented by casual dining, an events and exhibition venue. 2.1.4 The application proposals relate to the north-west area of the site, comprising the ‘West Village’, and surface level car parking facilities and one of Bluewater’s many lakes. The West Village contains several shops and restaurant premises at present. 2.1.5 Approximately 13,000 car parking spaces are provided at Bluewater and are distributed around the retail areas in seven individual car parking zones (four of which are decked). Access to the car parks is provided via a ring road, Bluewater Parkway, around the perimeter of the site. 2.2 Relevant Planning History 2.2.1 Bluewater was one of the first large scale development sites in the Thames Gateway and has had a significant role in bringing forward change through the creation of jobs, wealth and visitors. Outline planning permission was granted by the Secretary of State on 11 May 1990 (ref: DA/88/0336) for the “development of a regional centre with recreational and leisure facilities and associated access roads, including alterations to the existing highway network, and 10,000 car parking spaces”. The premises subsequently opened in March 1999.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review Borough of Gravesham/Borough of Dartford/District of Sevenoaks LOCAL GOVEHNICWT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND HEK)hT NO. LOCAL GOVKRflUEJlT BOI'NJJAHY COMMISSION FOR CHAIRMAN Mr C J Ellerton CMC MB1C Mr J U Powell PRICE FGV* Lady Aoknur lir T Brockbank DI^ Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Me B Qcholee QBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT 1. At present the New Barn residential area is split between Dartford Borough, Sevenoaks District and Gravesham Borough; the part situated in Dartford is in the parish of ^outhfleet; the part in Sevenoaks is in the parish of Longfield, whilst the part in Gravesham is unparished. On 30 November 1979» Gravesham Borough Council requested ue to review the boundaries between the districts of Gravesham, Dartford and Sevenoaks in the vicinity of New Barn. Their request was in response to representations from the New Barn Ratepayers Association for the whole of the New Barn residential area to be incorporated within Gravesham Borough. The Association based their representations on a survey of opinion which they carried out in 1978 among the residents of New Barn on the question of whether the area should be under one authority, and if so, which one. The results indicated that a majority (8?#) of residents indicating a view preferred to see New Barn under one authority and a large proportion (6990 of these considered that this should be Gravesham. 2. We noted that Kent County Council, Dartford Borough Council, Sevenoaks District Council, and Longfield Parish Council were all opposed to a review beinp undertaken at that time, although Kent County Council and Dartford BOrough Council did a^ree that the current boundaries in the New Barn area were not wholly satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames Gateway Risk Profile
    Review of Emergency Response Provision: Thames Gateway Cluster Risk Profile RERP - Thames Gateway Cluster Risk Profile Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 Description of Cluster ............................................................................................................ 5 Cluster Demographics and Population Risk Factors.............................................................. 6 Deprivation .......................................................................................................................... 10 Overall Cluster Risk ............................................................................................................ 11 Dwellings ......................................................................................................................... 11 Special Service ................................................................................................................ 12 Geodemographic Segmentation .......................................................................................... 13 Cluster Geodemographic Segmentation .......................................................................... 14 Building Usage as a Risk Identifier ...................................................................................... 16 Other Building Risk ............................................................................................................. 17 Sleeping Accommodation
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B - Local Development Scheme Chart
    Statement of Community Involvement Pre-Submission Public Participation Document Medway Local Development Framework August 2005 Medway Council 1 2 Preface The responses to the initial document called ‘The Statement of Community Involvement Pre–Submission Consultation Stage’ have now been analysed and the document amended where appropriate. A report has also been compiled containing a summary of representations to the document and the Council’s response, which is attached to this document. The amended SCI document is called the “Statement of Community Involvement Submission Draft ”. It is now available to the public and the Council is seeking your views on the proposed community involvement policy set out within it. All the documents including the response form can be downloaded from http://www.medway.gov.uk/ If you would like to make any comments please use one of the following methods. Send your written comments by post to: The Assistant Director, Regeneration and Environment Division, Medway Council, Compass Centre, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4YH Or send via e-mail to: [email protected] Or send by fax to: 01634 331125 Please note that comments cannot be treated as confidential. The start date for consultation is All comments must be received by If you require any assistance or would like to discuss any aspects of the new planning framework please feel free to contact and speak to one of our planners within the Development Plans & Research section: Wendy Lane - Development Plans and Research Manager ext. 331533 Bob Enderson - Senior Planning Officer ext. 331290 Morgan Slade - Senior Planning Officer ext 331028 Bryan Geake - Senior Planning Officer ext.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Air Quality Annual Status Report (ASR)
    DARTFORD Dartford Borough Council BOROUGH COUNCIL 2016 Air Quality Annual Status Report (ASR) In fulfilment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management LAQM Annual Status Report 2016 Dartford Borough Council Local Authority James Fox Officer Department Environmental Health Address Dartford Borough Council Telephone 01322 343434 E-mail [email protected] Report Reference DBCASR16 number Date January 2017 LAQM Annual Status Report 2016 Dartford Borough Council Executive Summary: Air Quality in Our Area This report fulfils the requirements of the Local Air Quality Management as set out in Part IV of the Environment Act (1995), the Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland 2007 and the relevant Policy and Technical Guidance documents. Air Quality in Dartford Borough Air pollution is associated with a number of adverse health impacts. It is recognised as a contributing factor in the onset of heart disease and cancer. Additionally, air pollution particularly affects the most vulnerable in society: children and older people, and those with heart and lung conditions. There is also often a strong correlation with equalities issues, because areas with poor air quality are also often the less affluent areas1,2. The annual health cost to society of the impacts of particulate matter alone in the UK is estimated to be around £16 billion3. The main source of air pollution in the borough is road traffic emissions from major roads, notably the M25, A282, A2, A226, A296 and A206. Dartford suffers from significant congestion, especially on the A282 Dartford Tunnel Approach Road, A2 Bean Interchange for Bluewater and main approach roads into Dartford town centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Medway Council Sports Facility Strategy and Action Plan
    MEDWAY COUNCIL Sports Facility Strategy and Action Plan November 2017 DOCUMENT CONTROL Amendment History Version No Date Author Comments 5 24/11/17 Taryn Dale Final Report Sign-off List Name Date Comments Tom Pinnington 24/11/17 Approved for distribution to client Distribution List Name Organisation Date Bob Dimond Medway Council 24/11/17 Medway Council 2 Sports Facility Strategy and Action Plan CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.2 Project Brief ............................................................................................................................... 5 1.3 Methodology and Approach ...................................................................................................... 6 2 BACKGROUND AND POLICY REVIEW ...................................................................................... 7 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 National Context ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.3 Local Policy Context ................................................................................................................ 12 2.4 Demographic Profile ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dartford Borough Council Council Size Submission
    Dartford Borough Council Council Size Submission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An electoral review of Dartford Borough Council has been triggered by the Local Government Boundary Commission as 41% of the Council’s current wards have an electoral variance of more than 10% from the average. Whilst the initial stage of the review is limited to determining the number of elected members required to deliver effective and convenient local government to this community (Council Size), the Council’s Leadership committed itself at an early stage to take the opportunity of the review to embed wider and positive change of its own. Like all Councils, Dartford has adopted patterns of working practice over the years that have not, in themselves, always required changes to committee structures or a public reassertion of the culture of the Council and the positive way it does business. The clear focus of the review, and the deadlines which drive it, are seen as a great opportunity to ‘reset’ the Council and prepare it for the huge challenges of providing community leadership to a Borough experiencing unprecedented growth and change. To that end, the Leader established a fully‐cross‐party Working Group bringing together senior Members of not only the leading Conservative Group (of which there are 34 Members) and Labour opposition (7 Members) but the Council’s minority Independent group (3 Members) too. Usual proportionality was abandoned so that each group had equal representation in order to fuel open and frank conversation. The Working Group’s conversations were as interesting as they were productive. At the heart was a clear desire to rebalance the role of Members as truly empowered community advocates and ambassadors with the traditional committee roles at the Civic Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverside Energy Park, Belvedere, South East London PINS Reference: EN010093 Section 46 Notification Under the Planning Act 2008 (The 2008 Act)
    Peter Brett Associates LLP Our ref: EN010093 33 Bowling Green Lane London EC1R 0BJ 12 June 2018 T: 0330 838 4254 The Planning Inspectorate E: [email protected] National Infrastructure Directorate Temple Quay House Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6PN FAO: Ewa Sherman Dear Ms Sherman RE: Riverside Energy Park, Belvedere, South East London PINS Reference: EN010093 Section 46 Notification under the Planning Act 2008 (the 2008 Act) The Secretary of State is hereby notified that Cory Environmental Holdings Limited (trading as Cory Riverside Energy) (‘the Applicant’) intends to make an application under Section 37 of the 2008 Act for a Development Consent Order (‘DCO’) to authorise the construction, operation and maintenance of an integrated energy park, known as Riverside Energy Park, at Norman Road in Belvedere in the London Borough of Bexley and an Electrical Connection to the Littlebrook substation located in the Borough of Dartford ('the Proposed Development'). The Proposed Development would comprise: . the Riverside Energy Park, located to the north of Belvedere off Norman Road; . the Electrical Connection, running underground between the Riverside Energy Park site and the Electrical Connection Point at Littlebrook substation into an existing National Grid building in Dartford; . the Main Temporary Construction Compounds located to the south of the Riverside Energy Park site and west of Norman Road; and . Other Cable Route Temporary Construction Compounds required to support the construction of the chosen Electrical Connection route. The primary components of Riverside Energy Park, with a nominal rated electrical output of up to 96 MWe, comprise: . an Energy Recovery Facility (ERF); . an Anaerobic Digestion facility; .
    [Show full text]
  • Dartford Unit 2 Banks Place, Market Place Da1 1Ex
    DARTFORD UNIT 2 BANKS PLACE, MARKET PLACE DA1 1EX TO LET – RETAIL / BUSINESS PREMISES - APPROX 796 SQ.FT (74 SQ.M) Location Dartford is the principal town in the Borough of Dartford, Kent and is located 9 miles South-East of London. The town enjoys good road connections being less than a mile from the intersection of the A2 and M25 motorway. The Dartford Crossing is approx. 1 mile to the North. Dartford Train Station is a short distance away and provides direct and regular services to London Bridge, Charing Cross, Cannon Street and London Victoria. The property is situated in a prominent position off of Market Street and close to the junction with the High Street. Accommodation Surrounding occupiers include Primark, Boots & Iceland. (with approximate dimensions and floor areas) Description Internal Width: 15’7” 4.8m Total Depth: 44’6” 13.6m Total Floor Area: 796 sq.ft 73 sq.m The property comprises a self-contained Store ground floor retail/business unit situated Kitchenette & WC within a mixed-use building. The accommodation is currently arranged to provide an open plan office suite with Terms glass partitioned meeting room, storeroom, kitchenette & WC. The premises are available to let on the basis of a new full We believe the premises would be repairing and insuring lease for a term of years to be agreed at suitable for a wide variety of business a commencing rent of £20,000 (Twenty Thousand Pounds) per including retail and/or financial and annum exclusive. Rents payable quarterly in advance. professional services. THE PROPERTY MISDESCRIPTIONS ACT 1991 The agent has not tested any apparatus, equipment, fixtures and fittings or services and so cannot verify that they are in working order of fit for the purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Transport Infrastructure Programme
    STRATEGIC TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAMME PART OF DARTFORD’S LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK February 2011 BOROUGH COUNCIL CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. The Programme 3 3. Recent Changes 4 4. Proposed Way Forward 5 Appendices A. Key Milestones in the Kent Thameside Transport Programme 8 B. Evidence Base 9 C. Kent Thameside Strategic Transport Programme: Initial Programme for Delivery 11 D. Reports to Dartford Council on the Transport Tariff 18 E. Transport Contributions Received/Committed 43 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This paper has been produced to support Dartford’s Core Strategy Submission document, in particular, Policy CS 16, Transport Investment. It addresses the delivery and implementation mechanisms for the transport schemes necessary to achieve the planned level of development. 1.2 The Proposed Submission evidence base contained a number of documents1 which assessed and defined the requirement for increased capacity to the transport network, as well as a mechanism for the funding and delivery of the schemes. The approach adopted is referred to as the Kent Thameside Strategic Transport Infrastructure Programme (STIP), a comprehensive package of schemes to support planned development in both Dartford and Gravesham Boroughs. Policy CS 16 refers to this programme. 1.3 Work with partners on the development of the Programme commenced in 2006. Early work focused on modelling of transport impacts arising from planned development and identifying mitigation schemes2 . The has seen a concentration on identification of funding sources, later period mechanisms for the delivery of the Programme3 and working arrangements between the partners. The core partners working together on the Programme are Dartford Council, Gravesham Council, Kent County Council, Kent Thameside Regeneration Partnership, the Highways Agency, Department for Transport and the Homes and Communities Agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Recommendations for Kent County Council 42
    Draft recommendations on the new electoral arrangements for Kent County Council Electoral review May 2015 Translations and other formats For information on obtaining this publication in another language or in a large-print or Braille version please contact the Local Government Boundary Commission for England: Tel: 0330 500 1525 Email: [email protected] The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 100049926 2015 Contents Summary 1 1 Introduction 2 2 Analysis and draft recommendations 4 Submissions received 4 Electorate figures 5 Council size 5 Division patterns 6 Detailed divisions 6 Ashford Borough 8 Canterbury City 10 Dartford Borough 14 Dover District 16 Gravesham Borough 18 Maidstone Borough 20 Sevenoaks District 22 Shepway District 25 Swale Borough 28 Thanet District 31 Tonbridge & Malling Borough 33 Tunbridge Wells Borough 35 Conclusions 37 Parish electoral arrangements 37 3 Have your say 40 Appendices A Table A1: Draft recommendations for Kent County Council 42 B Submissions received 50 C Glossary and abbreviations 52 Summary Who we are The Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE) is an independent body set up by Parliament. We are not part of government or any political party. We are accountable to Parliament through a committee of MPs chaired by the Speaker of the House of Commons. Our main role is to carry out electoral reviews of local authorities throughout England.
    [Show full text]
  • Limits to the Mega-City Region: Contrasting Local and Regional Needs Turok, Ivan
    www.ssoar.info Limits to the mega-city region: contrasting local and regional needs Turok, Ivan Postprint / Postprint Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: www.peerproject.eu Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Turok, I. (2009). Limits to the mega-city region: contrasting local and regional needs. Regional Studies, 43(6), 845-862. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903095261 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter dem "PEER Licence Agreement zur This document is made available under the "PEER Licence Verfügung" gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zum PEER-Projekt finden Agreement ". For more Information regarding the PEER-project Sie hier: http://www.peerproject.eu Gewährt wird ein nicht see: http://www.peerproject.eu This document is solely intended exklusives, nicht übertragbares, persönliches und beschränktes for your personal, non-commercial use.All of the copies of Recht auf Nutzung dieses Dokuments. Dieses Dokument this documents must retain all copyright information and other ist ausschließlich für den persönlichen, nicht-kommerziellen information regarding legal protection. You are not allowed to alter Gebrauch bestimmt. Auf sämtlichen Kopien dieses Dokuments this document in any way, to copy it for public or commercial müssen alle Urheberrechtshinweise und sonstigen Hinweise purposes, to exhibit the document in public, to perform, distribute auf gesetzlichen Schutz beibehalten werden. Sie dürfen dieses or otherwise use the document in public. Dokument nicht in irgendeiner Weise abändern, noch dürfen By using this particular document, you accept the above-stated Sie dieses Dokument für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke conditions of use. vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, aufführen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Mit der Verwendung dieses Dokuments erkennen Sie die Nutzungsbedingungen an.
    [Show full text]
  • 3094 the London Gazette, 26Th March 1965
    3094 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 26TH MARCH 1965 The Revised Map and Statement in definitive form substantially prejudiced by a failure to comply with may be inspected at the .offices of the County any such requirement as aforesaid, may make an Surveyor, County Offices, Aylesbury, at all reasonable Order declaring that, notwithstanding anything con- hours. A copy of so much of the Revised Map tained in the said Part IV, the definitive map shall and Statement in definitive form as relates to each not be conclusive evidence of any such matter as borough, urban district and rural district may be may be specified in the Order. inspected at all reasonable hours ait the following R. E. Millard, Clerk of .the Bucks County addresses: Council. Aylesbury Borough. The Town Clerk's Office, County Hall, Aylesbury. Municipal Offices, Aylesbury. Buckingham Borough. The Town Clerk's Office, 26th March 1965. Town Hall, Buckingham. (383) Blatch'ley Urban District. The Office of the Clerk of the Bletchley Urban District Council, Council Offices, Bletchley. Linslade Urban District. The Office of the Clerk KENT COUNTY COUNCIL of the "Wing Rural District Council, Brooklands, Leighton Road, Linslade. National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act, Newport Pagnell Urban District. The Office of the 1949 Clerk of the Newport Pagnell Urban District Provisional Map of Public Rights of Way Council, 60 High .Street, Newport Pagnell. Notice is hereby given that in accordance with Wolveitton Urban District. The Office of the Clerk section 30 of the National Parks and Access to the of the Wolverton Urban District Council, Market Countryside Act, 1949, the Kent County Council Square, Stony Stratford.
    [Show full text]