DOCSLIB.ORG

Secondary Analysis of Discrimination Against BDSM Identified Individuals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Secondary Analysis of Discrimination Against BDSM Identified Individuals City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2014 I Didn't Consent to That: Secondary Analysis of Discrimination Against BDSM Identified Individuals Larry Iannotti Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/229 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] I DIDN’T CONSENT TO THAT: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST BDSM-IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS By LARRY IANNOTTI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Social Welfare in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2014 ii © 2014 Larry Iannotti All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Social Welfare in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. SJ Dodd, PhD Date Chair of Examining Committee Harriet Goodman, DSW Date Executive Officer Professor Irwin Epstein Professor Gerald Mallon Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract I DIDN’T CONSENT TO THAT: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST BDSM-IDENTIFIED INDIVIDUALS by Larry Iannotti Dissertation Chair: Professor SJ Dodd Sadomasochistic (BDSM) sexual behavior is an understudied phenomenon within the social sciences generally, and social work in particular. While BDSM sexuality encompasses a wide variety of activities a community of individuals interested in BDSM is identifiable and has coalesced around organized groups, events, political activism, and shared sexual interests. This community has experienced discrimination, violence, and harassment (DVH) as a result of social approbation and stigma associated with BDSM practices. The study examines results of a secondary analysis of data from the Survey of Violence & Discrimination against Sexual Minorities, conducted in 2008. Severity and frequency of various types of DVH are explored and relationships between demographic characteristics, BDSM activities, and frequencies of DVH are examined. An emancipatory social work frame is used to contextualize the results of the analysis, and implications for both practice and policy are discussed. v Acknowledgements There are many people who need to be thanked for their help, encouragement, and time. First and foremost, my gratitude goes to SJ Dodd, not only for agreeing to chair the committee established to review this dissertation, but for her intellectual guidance, editorial skill, and cheer- leading talents, without which this project would never have come to completion. To Irwin Epstein, who helped guide me through my doctoral career, listened to my seemingly endless fears and frustrations, and even still, agreed to sit on the committee. To Gerald Mallon, who encouraged me from the very beginning and whose prolific writing inspires me to try and do the same. To Susan Wright, to whom I owe a large debt of gratitude, who is entirely responsible for the Survey of Violence & Discrimination against Sexual Minorities, and whose continuous advocacy for the BDSM community should serve as an example of how to move mountains. To Andrew Park, who has worked tirelessly for sexual rights and freedoms in the national and international arenas, and who was always ready to lend an ear (or organize a mock-defense!). To my friends who supported, cajoled, and challenged me; in particular, Johnny Flynn (for all those weekend hikes spent talking over my work), Maddy Petrow-Cohen (for listening, and listening and listening), Philip DiMauro, Eric Hartman, Matt Brim, Joe Eval, and Rich Lynn. To my entire family, of course, but with particular thanks to my mother and father, who instilled in me an inquisitive nature and a great respect for the value of an education; and to Sue Addis, who stayed excited about the potential of this research even when I wasn’t. To my professors and colleagues who provided both direction and inspiration, particularly Gayle Rubin, Ruth Ann Robson, Robin Bauer, Elizabeth Danto, and the doctoral faculty at the Silberman School of Social Work. And most of all to my partner in life, John Weis, for his quiet patience, gracious support, and his constant willingness to take Gruber for another walk so I could keep writing. vi Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... iv! Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ v! Tables .............................................................................................................................................. x! Figures ......................................................................................................................................... xii! Chapter I: Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1! Discrimination of Sadomasochistic and Fetishistic Sexual Minorities ....................................... 1! Why the Survey Data should be analyzed: Social Work and Empowerment of Marginal Populations. .............................................................................................................................. 3! Social Work with BDSM-identified Individuals. ..................................................................... 8! Surveying Discrimination - Clinical Implications. .................................................................. 9! Chapter II: Terminology and Context ...................................................................................... 11! BDSM Terminology: Safe, Sane and Consensual ..................................................................... 11! BDSM vs. Abuse and Violence: An Important Distinction. .................................................. 13! Types of Activities. ................................................................................................................ 14! Contextualizing BDSM: Legal, Psychological, and Sociological Perspectives ........................ 17! Legal Theorizing .................................................................................................................... 18! Psychological Theorizing ....................................................................................................... 24! Sociological and Anthropological Theorizing ....................................................................... 30! Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 38! Chapter III: A Review of the Literature on Discrimination ................................................... 40! Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination ............................................................................. 40! vii Theories of Discrimination. ................................................................................................... 40! Group Prejudice, Stigma and Discrimination. ....................................................................... 42! Individual Prejudice, Stigma and Discrimination. ................................................................. 44! The Relationship of Prejudice to Discrimination. .................................................................. 46! Literature on Quantitative Surveys of Discrimination of Sexual Minorities ............................. 48! BDSM as a Sexual Minority. ................................................................................................. 48! BDSM and LGB: Similarities and Differences. ..................................................................... 49! Significant LGBT Discrimination Research. ......................................................................... 53! The Hate Crimes Statistics Act. ............................................................................................. 55! Two Previous Anti-BDSM Surveys .......................................................................................... 57! Chapter IV: Discrimination in the BDSM Community ........................................................... 60! BDSM and Popular Culture: the Formation of Social Groups and Sexual Identities ................ 60! Discrimination of BDSM-identities and communities .............................................................. 62! Discrimination from the Heterosexual Community. .............................................................. 63! Discrimination within the LGB Community: the Minority’s Minority. ................................ 65! Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 69! Chapter V: Methodology ............................................................................................................ 72! Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 72! Sampling ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bdsm) Communities
    BOUND BY CONSENT: CONCEPTS OF CONSENT WITHIN THE LEATHER AND BONDAGE, DOMINATION, SADOMASOCHISM (BDSM) COMMUNITIES A Thesis by Anita Fulkerson Bachelor of General Studies, Wichita State University, 1993 Submitted to the Department of Liberal Studies and the faculty of the Graduate School of Wichita State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts December 2010 © Copyright 2010 by Anita Fulkerson All Rights Reserved Note that thesis work is protected by copyright, with all rights reserved. Only the author has the legal right to publish, produce, sell, or distribute this work. Author permission is needed for others to directly quote significant amounts of information in their own work or to summarize substantial amounts of information in their own work. Limited amounts of information cited, paraphrased, or summarized from the work may be used with proper citation of where to find the original work. BOUND BY CONSENT: CONCEPTS OF CONSENT WITHIN THE LEATHER AND BONDAGE, DOMINATION, SADOMASOCHISM (BDSM) COMMUNITIES The following faculty members have examined the final copy of this thesis for form and content, and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Arts with a major in Liberal Studies _______________________________________ Ron Matson, Committee Chair _______________________________________ Linnea Glen-Maye, Committee Member _______________________________________ Jodie Hertzog, Committee Member _______________________________________ Patricia Phillips, Committee Member iii DEDICATION To my Ma'am, my parents, and my Leather Family iv When you build consent, you build the Community. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my adviser, Ron Matson, for his unwavering belief in this topic and in my ability to do it justice and his unending enthusiasm for the project.
    [Show full text]
  • NECROPHILIC and NECROPHAGIC SERIAL KILLERS Approval Page
    Running head: NECROPHILIC AND NECROPHAGIC SERIAL KILLERS Approval Page: Florida Gulf Coast University Thesis APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Christina Molinari Approved: August 2005 Dr. David Thomas Committee Chair / Advisor Dr. Shawn Keller Committee Member The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. NECROPHILIC AND NECROPHAGIC SERIAL KILLERS 1 Necrophilic and Necrophagic Serial Killers: Understanding Their Motivations through Case Study Analysis Christina Molinari Florida Gulf Coast University NECROPHILIC AND NECROPHAGIC SERIAL KILLERS 2 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Literature Review............................................................................................................................ 7 Serial Killing ............................................................................................................................... 7 Characteristics of sexual serial killers ..................................................................................... 8 Paraphilia ................................................................................................................................... 12 Cultural and Historical Perspectives
    [Show full text]
  • Seminar in Paraphilic Disorders Kim E
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Educational Specialist The Graduate School Spring 2018 Seminar in paraphilic disorders Kim E. Hall James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/edspec201019 Part of the Counselor Education Commons Recommended Citation Hall, Kim E., "Seminar in paraphilic disorders" (2018). Educational Specialist. 127. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/edspec201019/127 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Educational Specialist by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Seminar in Paraphilic Disorders Kim Elise Hall A research project submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Educational Specialist Clinical Mental Health Counseling May 2018 FACULTY COMMITTEE: Committee Chair: Debbie Sturm, Ph.D. Committee Members/ Readers: Lennie Echterling, Ph.D. Renee Staton. Ph.D. Acknowledgments I am grateful beyond words to those who provided me the guidance, patience, understanding, and dedicated support I needed to complete this project and my course of studies. To the counseling faculty and staff at James Madison University, thank you for teaching and challenging me to understand my studies and myself to the best of my ability, and showing me what true enthusiasm and passion for counseling can do. To my cohort, especially the splendid Women of Substance, thank you for allowing me to learn from your experiences, and for the thousands of chances we’ve had to lean on each other whether we’re laughing or crying.
    [Show full text]
  • Common BDSM Terminology
    Common BDSM Terminology Common Terminology: • BDSM – Bondage and Discipline, Dominance and Submission, Sadism and Masochism. • SSC – Safe, Sane, Consensual • RACK – Risk Aware Consensual Kink • PRICK – Personal Responsibility Informed Consensual Kink • Scene – Both the BDSM Community as a whole and a play interaction. • “Thud” – Sensation produced when struck with broad/heavy/soft toys – e.g .floggers, big paddles. • “Sting” – Sensation produced when struck with thin/light/hard toys – e.g. cane or single tail. • Dungeon – a (public or private) play space. • DM (Dungeon Monitor) – Public playspace lifeguard. • Squick – Something that viscerally turns you off. The sound of your parents fucking on the kitchen table. • BBW – Big Beautiful Woman • Sub Frenzy – The desire to try everything when one is new to the scene. • Subspace – An altered state often resulting from endorphins released through sensation/impact play. • Sub Drop/Top Drop – Temporary depression sometimes experienced (hours or days) after intense play. Safeword – a word or phrase used to pause or stop play. • Stop!/No! - If you’re a beginner (or playing with a beginner), keep it simple, no means no, stop means stop. • Safeword!/Red! – Stop now! Something is seriously wrong. DMs/bystanders requested to help. • Yellow/Mercy – I can’t take much more, need a break, please check in. • Green – I’m having a good time, please continue! • Beige – I’m so bored I’m thinking about what color to paint the ceiling. Roles: • Top/Bottom – Enjoy physical play (bondage, flogging, whipping, etc.) • Sadist/Masochist – Enjoy inflicting/receiving pain (intense physical sensation). • Dom/Sub – Enjoy mental power exchange (following orders, serving, etc.) • Master/Slave – Enjoy long term owner/property relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Paraphilia Not Otherwise Specified
    Arch Sex Behav DOI 10.1007/s10508-009-9552-0 ORIGINAL PAPER The DSM Diagnostic Criteria for Paraphilia Not Otherwise Specified Martin P. Kafka Ó American Psychiatric Association 2009 Abstract The category of ‘‘Not Otherwise Specified’’ (NOS) Introduction for DSM-based psychiatric diagnosis has typically retained diag- noses whose rarity, empirical criterion validation or symptomatic Prior to an informed discussion of the residual category for expression has been insufficient to be codified. This article re- paraphilic disorders, Paraphilia Not Otherwise Specified (PA- views the literature on Telephone Scatologia, Necrophilia, Zoo- NOS), it is important to briefly review the diagnostic criteria philia, Urophilia, Coprophilia, and Partialism. Based on extant for a categorical diagnosis of paraphilic disorders as well as the data, no changes are suggested except for the status of Partialism. types of conditions reserved for the NOS designation. Partialism, sexual arousal characterized by ‘‘an exclusive focus The diagnostic criteria for paraphilic disorders have been mod- on part of the body,’’ had historically been subsumed as a type of ified during the publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Man- Fetishism until the advent of DSM-III-R. The rationale for con- uals of the American Psychiatric Association. In the latest edition, sidering the removal of Partialism from Paraphilia NOS and its DSM-IV-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2000), a para- reintegration as a specifier for Fetishism is discussed here and in a philic disorder must meet two essential criteria. The essential companion review on the DSM diagnostic criteria for fetishism features of a Paraphilia are recurrent, intense sexually arousing (Kafka, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-05-25 Prohibited Words List
    Clouthub Prohibited Word List Our prohibited words include derogatory racial terms and graphic sexual terms. Rev. 05/25/2020 Words Code 2g1c 1 4r5e 1 1 Not Allowed a2m 1 a54 1 a55 1 acrotomophilia 1 anal 1 analprobe 1 anilingus 1 ass-fucker 1 ass-hat 1 ass-jabber 1 ass-pirate 1 assbag 1 assbandit 1 assbang 1 assbanged 1 assbanger 1 assbangs 1 assbite 1 asscock 1 asscracker 1 assface 1 assfaces 1 assfuck 1 assfucker 1 assfukka 1 assgoblin 1 asshat 1 asshead 1 asshopper 1 assjacker 1 asslick 1 asslicker 1 assmaster 1 assmonkey 1 assmucus 1 assmunch 1 assmuncher 1 assnigger 1 asspirate 1 assshit 1 asssucker 1 asswad 1 asswipe 1 asswipes 1 autoerotic 1 axwound 1 b17ch 1 b1tch 1 babeland 1 1 Clouthub Prohibited Word List Our prohibited words include derogatory racial terms and graphic sexual terms. Rev. 05/25/2020 ballbag 1 ballsack 1 bampot 1 bangbros 1 bawdy 1 bbw 1 bdsm 1 beaner 1 beaners 1 beardedclam 1 bellend 1 beotch 1 bescumber 1 birdlock 1 blowjob 1 blowjobs 1 blumpkin 1 boiolas 1 bollock 1 bollocks 1 bollok 1 bollox 1 boner 1 boners 1 boong 1 booobs 1 boooobs 1 booooobs 1 booooooobs 1 brotherfucker 1 buceta 1 bugger 1 bukkake 1 bulldyke 1 bumblefuck 1 buncombe 1 butt-pirate 1 buttfuck 1 buttfucka 1 buttfucker 1 butthole 1 buttmuch 1 buttmunch 1 buttplug 1 c-0-c-k 1 c-o-c-k 1 c-u-n-t 1 c.0.c.k 1 c.o.c.k.
    [Show full text]
  • For Love and for Justice: Narratives of Lesbian Activism
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2-2014 For Love and for Justice: Narratives of Lesbian Activism Kelly Anderson Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/8 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] For Love and For Justice: Narratives of Lesbian Activism By Kelly Anderson A dissertation submitted to the faculty of The Graduate Center, City University of New York in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History 2014 © 2014 KELLY ANDERSON All Rights Reserved ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Blanche Wiesen Cook Chair of Examining Committee Helena Rosenblatt Executive Officer Bonnie Anderson Bettina Aptheker Gerald Markowitz Barbara Welter Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract For Love and for Justice: Narratives of Lesbian Activism By Kelly Anderson Adviser: Professor Blanche Wiesen Cook This dissertation explores the role of lesbians in the U.S. second wave feminist movement, arguing that the history of women’s liberation is more diverse, more intersectional,
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Fantasy and Masturbation Among Asexual Individuals: an In-Depth Exploration
    Arch Sex Behav (2017) 46:311–328 DOI 10.1007/s10508-016-0870-8 SPECIAL SECTION: THE PUZZLE OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION Sexual Fantasy and Masturbation Among Asexual Individuals: An In-Depth Exploration 1 1 2 Morag A. Yule • Lori A. Brotto • Boris B. Gorzalka Received: 4 January 2016 / Revised: 8 August 2016 / Accepted: 20 September 2016 / Published online: 23 November 2016 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 Abstract Human asexuality is generally defined as a lack of pants(bothmenandwomen)wereequallylikelytofantasizeabout sexual attraction. We used online questionnaires to investigate topics such as fetishes and BDSM. reasons for masturbation, and explored and compared the con- tentsofsexualfantasiesofasexualindividuals(identifiedusing Keywords Asexuality Á Sexual orientation Á Masturbation Á the Asexual Identification Scale) with those of sexual individ- Sexual fantasy uals. A total of 351 asexual participants (292 women, 59 men) and 388sexualparticipants(221women,167men)participated.Asex- ual women were significantly less likely to masturbate than sexual Introduction women, sexual men, and asexual men. Asexual women were less likely to report masturbating for sexual pleasure or fun than their Although the definition of asexuality varies somewhat, the gen- sexualcounterparts, and asexualmen were less likely to reportmas- erallyaccepteddefinitionisthedefinitionforwardedbythelargest turbating forsexualpleasure than sexualmen. Both asexualwomen online web-community of asexual individuals (Asexuality Visi- andmen weresignificantlymorelikelythansexualwomenand
    [Show full text]
  • List of Paraphilias
    List of paraphilias Paraphilias are sexual interests in objects, situations, or individuals that are atypical. The American Psychiatric Association, in its Paraphilia Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fifth Edition (DSM), draws a Specialty Psychiatry distinction between paraphilias (which it describes as atypical sexual interests) and paraphilic disorders (which additionally require the experience of distress or impairment in functioning).[1][2] Some paraphilias have more than one term to describe them, and some terms overlap with others. Paraphilias without DSM codes listed come under DSM 302.9, "Paraphilia NOS (Not Otherwise Specified)". In his 2008 book on sexual pathologies, Anil Aggrawal compiled a list of 547 terms describing paraphilic sexual interests. He cautioned, however, that "not all these paraphilias have necessarily been seen in clinical setups. This may not be because they do not exist, but because they are so innocuous they are never brought to the notice of clinicians or dismissed by them. Like allergies, sexual arousal may occur from anything under the sun, including the sun."[3] Most of the following names for paraphilias, constructed in the nineteenth and especially twentieth centuries from Greek and Latin roots (see List of medical roots, suffixes and prefixes), are used in medical contexts only. Contents A · B · C · D · E · F · G · H · I · J · K · L · M · N · O · P · Q · R · S · T · U · V · W · X · Y · Z Paraphilias A Paraphilia Focus of erotic interest Abasiophilia People with impaired mobility[4] Acrotomophilia
    [Show full text]
  • BDSM Coercive Control Checklist
    Samantha Manewitz RSW CST Not for mass distribution! BDSM Non-Consensual Coercive Behaviour Checklist Please note, this checklist does not apply to BDSM in the context of sex work. If you are in sex work, answer only in regards to your BDSM involvement outside of a client/provider relationship. 1. Age: 2. Ethnicity 3. Where do you currently reside? ❏ Canada ❏ United States ❏ State or Province: 4. Gender: 5. Sexual orientation: 6. What role best describes you? (Check all that apply) ❏ Top Roles: ❏ Dominant ❏ Top ❏ Master/Mistress/Non-binary equivalent ❏ Service top ❏ Caregiver ❏ Pet owner ❏ Rigger ❏ Leather top ❏ Sadist ❏ Other (please specify) ❏ Bottom Roles ❏ Submissive ❏ Slave ❏ Bottom ❏ Masochist ❏ Pet ❏ Little ❏ Service submissive ❏ Rope bottom ❏ Other (please specify) ❏ Switch 1 Samantha Manewitz RSW CST Not for mass distribution! ❏ Fluid ❏ Fetishist ❏ Unsure ❏ Prefer not to say ❏ Other (please specify) 7. What best describes your engagement with kink/BDSM communities (when not social distancing)? Check all that apply ❏ Only in the bedroom ❏ I’m not involved in the scene, but I’d like to be ❏ I think I went to a munch once? ❏ I occasionally engage with online and/or in person groups ❏ I only engage with the community online (even when not social distancing) ❏ Specify frequency of engagement online: Rarely, Occasionally, Sometimes, Often, Very often ❏ I sometimes go to events or meetups ❏ I would be more involved, but I don’t have access to community ❏ I’m deeply invested in my local community ❏ I often travel to kink conferences, camping events, and/or workshops ❏ I live the lifestyle when I can ❏ I’m in a 24/7 dynamic ❏ I’m part of a leather family/household ❏ I’m a community organizer ❏ I’m a community educator ❏ I’m a title holder/compete in title pageants ❏ Unsure ❏ Still figuring out my level of involvement ❏ I used to be involved in my community, but I’ve since stepped away ❏ Prefer not to say ❏ Other (please specify) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • 12, 2017 Manchester, NH Table of Contents
    November 10 - 12, 2017 Manchester, NH Table of Contents Note from the Board 3 General Event Rules 4 Dress Code 6 Nighttime Party Rules 7 Security, Health, & Safety 8 Consent Policy 9 Film Screening 10 Photo Lounge 11 Friday Night Erotic Art Show 12 Presenter Bios 14 Vendors 19 Vendor Bingo 19 Maps 23 Friday Schedule 28 Friday Night Scavenger Hunt 28 Saturday Schedule 30 Sunday Schedule 32 Class Descriptions 34 SIGs and Lounges 51 About Our Sponsor 52 Lunch Options 52 About the Board 54 About the Staff 55 Thank Yous Back Cover Hungry? Boxed lunches may be purchased for Saturday and/or Sunday. Purchases must be made at the Registration Desk by 9:30am the day of. Lunches are $15 each and include: sandwich with lettuce (ham, turkey, or roast beef), chips, fruit, and desert. There is also a vegetarian box option. Looking for more options? See what’s in the area. https://goo.gl/LpWTuV -2- Note from the Board Welcome, and thank you for attending KinkyCon XI! KinkyCon is a grassroots, locally-focused event. Most of our presenters are from our own kinky community. Many of our vendors are folks you know, and they offer their wares at fair prices with exceptional quality, and local service. Our volunteers are from the local community, and give their time to make the Con run as smoothly as possible. They are the reason for the warm, welcoming feel throughout the weekend. We are here to make sure you have a great experience at KinkyCon. If you have any questions, concerns, or problems, please talk to one of the KinkyCon staff members right away.
    [Show full text]
  • Paraphilia NOS, Nonconsent: Not Ready for the Courtroom
    ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY Paraphilia NOS, Nonconsent: Not Ready for the Courtroom Allen Frances, MD, and Michael B. First, MD Sexually violent predators (SVP) constitute a serious potential risk to public safety, especially when they are released after too short a prison sentence. Twenty states and the federal government have developed a seemingly convenient way to reduce this risk. They have passed statutes that allow for the involuntary (often lifetime) psychiatric commitment of mentally disordered sexual offenders after prison time is up. In three separate cases, the Supreme Court has accepted the constitutionality of this procedure, but only if the offender’s dangerousness is caused by a mental disorder and is not a manifestation of simple criminality. The idea that paraphilic rape should be an official category in the psychiatric diagnostic manual has been explicitly rejected by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-III, DSM-III-R, DSM-IV, and, recently, DSM-5. Despite this, paraphilia NOS, nonconsent, is still frequently used by mental health evaluators in SVP cases to provide a mental disorder diagnosis that legitimizes psychiatric commitment and makes it appear constitutional. This commentary will show how the diagnosis paraphilia NOS, nonconsent, is based on a fundamental misreading of the original intent of the DSM-IV Paraphilia Workgroup and represents a misuse of psychiatry, all in the admittedly good cause of protecting public safety. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 39:555–61, 2011 The legal system unwittingly created a dilemma for rage when recently released offenders reoffended, itself 30 years ago when it adopted fixed sentencing as sometimes in the most horrible ways imaginable.
    [Show full text]