Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys Cover images: Coral Restoration Foundation (top), The Florida Aquarium (bottom, left), Reef Resilience Network (bottom, right).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs ...... 2 Introduction ...... 2 The Iconic Florida Keys ...... 3 The Decline of the Iconic Florida Reefs ...... 5 The Restoration Mission...... 6 The Methods ...... 10 The Plan ...... 13 Conclusion & How You Can Help ...... 17 Appendix I. Methods ...... 18 Overall Effort ...... 18 Site Selection ...... 18 Mapping and Field Verification ...... 21 Zonation...... 23 Zone Targets by Phase ...... 24 Requirements Calculations ...... 26 Conclusion ...... 31 Appendix II. Reef by Reef Habitat Mapping and Summary ...... 32 Carysfort North ...... 32 Carysfort South ...... 33 Cheeca Rocks ...... 34 Eastern Dry Rocks ...... 35 Horseshoe Reef ...... 36 Looe Key ...... 37 Newfound Harbor ...... 38 Sombrero Reef ...... 39 Appendix III. Cost Estimate Narrative ...... 40 Site Preparation ...... 40 Coral Restoration ...... 41 Grazers ...... 41 Site Maintenance ...... 42 Monitoring ...... 42 Adaptive Management and Disaster Recovery ...... 42 Cost Estimate Details ...... 42 Phase 1A / 1B ...... 43 RESTORING SEVEN ICONIC REEFS A Scientific and Collaborative Plan

Introduction For thousands of years, the calcium carbonate skeletons of millions of stony coral polyps have layered atop one another, building a natural structure that rises from the depths of the Atlantic Ocean floor and extends from Biscayne Bay south to the Dry Tortugas, fringing the Florida Keys coastline. These three-dimensional limestone cities of the sea are habitats teeming with underwater life, forming over one hundred miles of a bank barrier reef that supports the foundation of Photo: Mac Stone. the Florida Keys marine ecosystem and economy. Unfortunately, just beneath the surface of the famous turquoise waters, decades of cumulative stressors have led to catastrophic decline of the region’s coral reefs, the ecosystem that shapes the identity, culture, and economy of the Florida Keys.

Saving Florida Keys coral reefs will require a multi-pronged approach that considers impacts at local and global scales, requiring direct Photo: Andy Newman. and informed local interventions to be implemented immediately to keep Florida Keys reef ecosystems from collapsing beyond a point at which the reef ecosystem can be restored (National Academy of Sciences, 2019).

In response to reef decline, the Florida Keys has become the world leader in coral restoration. While local efforts have had success at small spatial scales, the rate of restoration has not been able to keep up with the overall rate of reef health decline in the Florida Keys. In order to restore Florida Keys reefs to benefit generations to come, restoration efforts must be scaled up with focus at the ecosystem level and with long term resiliency in mind. Current work is showing that large-scale restoration of coral reefs is possible and by harnessing research for novel ecological and genetic intervention strategies, restored reefs can be more resilient (Baums et al., 2019, National Academy of Sciences, 2019). Active and targeted coral restoration and repopulation

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 2 has the potential to reverse decline and rebuild coral populations allowing restored reefs to seed surrounding reef habitat (P.H.M. Maya et al., 2016).

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys is a comprehensive approach that uses the best available restoration science to improve reef ecological function by restoring diverse, reef-building corals to seven iconic reef sites in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Informed by years of research, successful trials, and expertise from two dozen coral scientists and restoration practitioners, this scientific and collaborative plan will put Florida’s reefs on track for recovery and demonstrate how restoration can support a vibrant, sustainable, local economy.

The Iconic Florida Keys The Florida Keys Reef Tract is the only bank barrier coral reef in the continental United States, attracting nearly 5 million visitors each year who contribute $2.4 billion in sales annually in the Keys (TBD Economics, LLC, 2019). About half of those visitors arrive to Key West by plane or by ship, while the other half drive from the mainland on the two-lane Overseas Highway, the only Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary road connecting the island Designated in 1990, Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary protects 2,900 chain (Tourist Development square nautical miles of marine habitat stretching from southern Miami to Council, 2018). the Dry Tortugas. Since its inception almost 30 years ago, the sanctuary has implemented numerous regulations and strategies in the interest of the ecological health of the Keys: Diving, snorkeling, and sport ● Installation of over 490 mooring buoys in order to reduce damage to fishing remain top reefs and seagrass beds from boat anchoring. recreational attractions in the ● The establishment of 18 Sanctuary Preservation Areas (SPAs) Florida Keys and one out of covering 4.87 sq nautical miles. every two jobs is connected ● The establishment of two Ecological Reserve Zones at Western Sambo Key and areas adjacent to Dry Tortugas National Park covering to the marine ecosystem nearly 160 sq nautical miles. (TBD Economics, LLC, ● The management of 24 “no take” zones making up 6% of the total 2019). Islamorada is known sanctuary area. In 2002, state waters of the sanctuary were declared a No-Discharge Zone for vessels. Since then, new vessel pump-out facilities process wastewater that would otherwise go untreated into nearshore waters.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 3 as the “Sport Fishing Capital of the World,” offering incredible fishing opportunities for deep- sea, backcountry, and fly- fishing.

The structure created by reef- building (stony coral) provides habitat for recreationally and commercially important fish species and a myriad of other animals, including spiny “When people ask me what I love the most about the Florida Keys, I tell lobster, sea turtles, and eels. them it's right here! The only coral barrier reef in North America is right In addition to being productive here in the United States. Some of the world’s best fishing, diving, and ecosystems, Florida Keys snorkeling is here in our own backyard. reefs provide physical “Thousands of jobs, millions of visitors, billions of dollars, and an entire protection to the coastline. A marine ecosystem is supported by the Florida Keys each year. We all rely on the Florida Keys Reef Tract, in one way or another, it is a barrier coral reef is exactly national treasure and we must do everything we can to protect it!” what it sounds like: the reef - Captain Tony Young creates a barrier between the Owner, Forever Young Charter Company intense energy of the open ocean and the land. The Photo: Will Benson. physical structure of the corals create height on the reef which helps to dissipate or “break” “We’ve got over 14,000 dives between us from dives all wave energy before it reaches throughout the Caribbean and one land, reducing the erosional thing that stuck out to us about impact of storm surge and diving in the Florida Keys is how flooding (Reguero et al., 2018). many fish are on the reefs here. “With that said, we now are now Famous for towering old growth at a crossroad. Our corals are struggling to survive, so we must star coral colonies, and thickets either help our coral reefs by upon thickets of elkhorn and restoring their once great vibrancy staghorn coral colonies, the or watch the density of our great fish populations dissipate into Florida Keys reefs offer world extinction.” class diving opportunities that - Mike and Marcia Goldberg are quickly being dethroned as Owners, Key Dives Dive Shop the coral cover of the reefs continues to decline. Photo: Summit Foundation.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 4 The Decline of the Iconic Florida Reefs Similar to many environmental problems, the decline in coral cover on Florida Keys reefs cannot be blamed on a single cause. Locally, impacts to the reefs come from disease events, hurricanes, pollution, overfishing, misplaced boat anchors, and ship groundings. Globally, warming oceans threaten coral reefs as elevated ocean temperatures can cause bleaching in corals, compromising coral health. Over the last 40 years, local and global stressors have compounded to reduce healthy coral of Florida Keys reefs from covering more Photo: Coral Restoration Foundation. than 25% of reef habitat in the 1980s to only about 5% in 2019 with cover as low as 2%* at Coral Reproduction the seven iconic reef sites (FWC, 2018, A. Bruckner, personal communication, July Coral species reproduce in one of two ways. Some corals break apart, or fragment, and spread 2019). Many of the Florida Key reefs have genetically identical clones, which, under favorable been degraded to point that high-relief conditions, can attach to the reef and develop into communities supported by stony corals are new colonies. However, most stony corals reproduce shifting to communities dominated by sexually. Sexual reproduction is important to maintain genetic diversity of a species, which is especially nuisance species and thick mats of algae that important for large-scale coral restoration efforts. trap sediment prohibiting successful There are two modes of sexual coral reproduction: settlement of new corals. broadcast spawning and brooding. Broadcast spawning occurs when the eggs of one Unfortunately, the remaining populations of coral colony come in contact with the sperm of another genetically different coral colony in close stony coral species are at such low numbers proximity within the water column and fertilization that successful sexual reproduction for many takes place. The larvae are carried by currents to species in the Florida Keys is compromised neighboring reefs. For most broadcast spawning (M.W. Miller, 2018, N. Knowlton, 2001). As species, this only happens one night each year. the population of stony corals in the Florida By contrast, brooding coral species have internal Keys has declined, fewer male and female fertilization before releasing larvae into the water column. coral colonies remain in close enough Larvae from broadcast spawning may reside as proximity to one another to successfully plankton in the water column for up to several weeks, reproduce. whereas brooded larvae may be immediately ready for settlement. Either way, the larvae settle on the Losing Florida Keys reefs will result in seafloor and search for a suitable substrate. The following weeks are a crucial period for the tiny coral cascading effects to the region’s economy polyp. In order to avoid being overgrown by algae or and culture, which are firmly rooted in the being buried by sediment, the little coral has to grow local marine ecosystem. Without the support quickly (SECORE International, n.d.).

*This figure represents the generalized % cover at the 7 Iconic Reef Sites based on preliminary data and observations from 2019 post-disease event. This is not a Florida Keys wide percentage and has not yet been verified by official data from the State of Florida.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 5 of a healthy reef system, the last surviving corals will succumb to the effects of stressors and no longer be able to provide the structure, habitat, and beauty for which Florida Keys reefs are known. Lacking a draw for tourists, the economic sector that is currently centered around the reef economy may be forced to shift, fundamentally changing the culture of the Florida Keys. Photo: Gena Parsons. The decline of Florida Keys reefs has not gone unnoticed, and the call for a comprehensive restoration strategy from the Florida Keys community has gained momentum. The Florida Keys Sanctuary Advisory Council, a diverse group of community stakeholders, has been tracking the rapid decline of the reefs, evaluating outcomes of pilot restoration efforts, and requesting an effort to scale up restoration since 2011.

The urgency for restoration increased in 2018, following the severe impacts from Hurricane Irma and the extent of “The reef is the lifeblood of the community, culture, and economy mortality caused by the widespread outbreak of stony coral of the Florida Keys, losing it is not tissue loss disease (SCTLD). In April 2019, NOAA gathered a an option. We need a plan to turn group of more than 25 local researchers, restoration things around and we need it now.” practitioners, and members of several state and federal - Russell Post agencies to answer that call. Over the course of the next six Owner, Ocean Sotheby’s

months, that group created a first of its kind restoration International Realty

mission, Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover in the Florida Keys the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys.

Mission: Iconic Reefs is not a new regulatory action, rather it is a plan designed to complement other management efforts to put Florida Keys reefs on a path to recovery.

The Restoration Mission Local restoration efforts have refined coral propagation and coral gardening techniques and have had some success with coral survivorship and reproduction, however, these efforts have only included a few species and are not sufficient in scale and scope to rehabilitate the structure, diversity, and function of the reef system. Mission: Iconic Reefs uses a phased implementation strategy focusing on genetic diversity and resiliency to restore multiple foundational coral and non-coral species in multiple habitat types across seven reefs.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 6 The reef sites represent the iconic diversity and productivity of the Florida Keys reef tract, spanning the full geographic range of the region, a variety of habitats, and a range of human uses. Sites chosen for this effort also have a history of restoration outplant success, or characteristics that lend themselves to a high probability of success.

Each of the reef sites is unique, comprised of multiple, distinct types of habitat supporting different micro-ecosystems. To Photo: Reef Renewal. create a targeted strategy for each reef location, habitat specific zones were identified at each reef site, with restoration What about water quality? targets and coral outplants tailored to each Regionally, efforts are being made to address water reef zone. quality impacts, which have contributed to the on- going decline. Regional and local water quality After clearing portions of reef surfaces of improvements need to occur in parallel for long term success and survivability of restoration efforts. nuisance and invasive species, the Plan will restore multiple stony coral species such as Proactive coral restoration is still essential to begin rebuilding and re-establishing reproductively viable elkhorn, staghorn, star, brain, and pillar populations that can withstand environmental corals throughout different habitat zones. stressors. Additionally, long-spined sea urchins and Caribbean king crab, once abundant on Florida Keys reefs, will be reintroduced to aid in keeping the reef free from excess algae following continued research and development. Urchin and crab grazers can reduce competition between corals and algae, enhancing the potential for natural recruitment of coral larvae. At the same time, a workforce of professional and volunteer divers will take care of debris removal and repair of damaged corals as part of a suite of local management efforts Coral spawning at The Florida Aquarium’s land- to ensure that our investment lasts for based coral facility. Photo: The Florida Aquarium. generations.

Strong genetic diversity is the underpinning of resilience and adaptation, however for some species included in this effort, the populations have declined to a point that it appears there may not be enough underlying genetic diversity in the broodstock population to support the level of

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 7 production that will be required. For example, the current stock of elkhorn coral in the Florida Keys does not contain enough genetic diversity to produce all of the 130,000+ corals needed as part of this mission. To ensure genetic diversity and resilience of the restored corals, new genotypes that support long-term resilience to future stressors, will be bred in land-based coral nurseries and outplanted to the reef as part of a Genetic Diversity Plan that will be part of each reef’s specific Implementation Plan.

Each reef’s Implementation Plan will also address the level of site preparation and maintenance that will be required prior to and after outplanting corals. Determination of which species of algae or other potential nuisances to be removed Photo: The Florida Aquarium. and in what quantities will be made by experts who are familiar with the local ecology of each reef and restoration best practices. Depending on the species and size of corals being outplanted, and condition of the reef site, more or less site preparation and continued maintenance will be necessary to support coral growth and health.

Elkhorn coral (Acropora palmata) A large, fast-growing species, its branching structure creates habitat for a wide variety of fish and invertebrates species. Elkhorn coral is not susceptible to stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) and is already widely cultured for restoration throughout Florida, making it a key focal species for Phase 1.

Star Coral (Orbicella spp., Montastrea cavernosa) Slow-growing species that form enormous boulders, making them critical foundational species on Florida reefs. Restoration practitioners use a strategy called microfragmentation to increase star coral growth rates, but research is still needed to scale up this process. Most star corals will be outplanted in Phase 2.

Pillar Coral (Dendrogyra cylindrus) A rare but important species, it creates complex habitat for reef-dwelling species. Unfortunately, pillar coral is highly susceptible to SCTLD. Samples of healthy Florida pillar coral colonies have been placed in aquaria to preserve their genetic diversity amid the disease outbreak. Scientists are using these colonies to learn how to propagate this species for restoration. Most will be outplanted during Phase 2.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 8 Staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) A fast growing species that contributes to reef development and provides habitat for many other species. It is well-studied and widely cultured for restoration, and is not susceptible to SCTLD,Therefore an important target species for Phase 1.

Brain Coral (Pseudodiplora spp., Colpophyllia natans, Diploria labyrinthiformis) Important foundational species, forming medium to large boulder-shaped colonies. Brain corals are not widely propagated for restoration, however these slow-growing species are good candidates for microfragmentation. Most brain corals will be outplanted in Phase 2.

Phase 1 and Phase 2 The phased plan allows active restoration to begin immediately while allowing for ongoing research and development. During Phase 1 of the Plan, coral cover across the seven iconic reef sites will be restored to an average of 15%, and by the end of Phase 2, coral cover will be restored to an average of 25%.

Photo: Coral Restoration Foundation. Phase 1 consists of approximately 6 years of active outplanting of clusters of elkhorn, star, brain, pillar, and staghorn coral to the reefs. Initial action during Phase 1A will include the restoration of elkhorn coral species, a fast growing species that has not been susceptible to the stony coral tissues loss disease that is currently afflicting Florida and Caribbean stony corals. Elkhorn coral clusters outplanted in year 1 will reach reproductive maturity in 3-5 years. Immediately returning structure to the reefs will create habitat and wave energy abatement. Habitat creation will increase populations of other marine organisms living on the reef, improving ecosystem function and stability to support future phases of outplanting. Phase 1B can operate concurrently with Phase 1A and will improve diversity on the reef by restoring star, brain, pillar, and staghorn corals as well as supplementing long-spined sea urchins and Caribbean king crab. Natural reproduction and recruitment is not accounted for in the target coral restoration goals

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 9 identified for each reef, therefore, it is possible that benefits from natural processes will also be seen on the restored reefs during the life of the Plan, further increasing coral cover.

Current knowledge regarding propagation of long-spined sea urchin and king crab is limited, and as such, this activity is proposed only if research and development trials during Phase 1B prove successful. As trials are completed, population targets will be developed and necessary adjustments will be made under adaptive management plans. Photo: Josh Patterson, University of Florida.

Phase 2 consists of approximately 12 years of active outplanting of elkhorn, star, brain, pillar, and staghorn corals in addition to the outplanting of other small stony corals such as finger and blade coral, adding diversity to the reefs. Depending on resource availability, Phase 1A, Phase 1B, and Phase 2 can be implemented concurrently, sequentially, or a combination thereof.

The Methods Describing this effort at a high-level is simple, but the core of any successful plan is its details. The section below provides an overview of the details that the team worked through to create the plan. A closer look at the approach and the math that supports our recommendations can be found in Appendix I- Methods.

A results-based approach was used to create Mission: Iconic Reefs, whereby the scope for restoration was developed with an ultimate goal of restoring the reef to a self-sustaining system.

Site Selection The first step in the process of building the scope for restoration in the Plan was to select sites that are spread across the Upper, Middle, and Lower Keys that represent the best of Florida Keys reefs, and demonstrate how restoration can support a vibrant, sustainable local economy into the future. The seven reef sites selected for the Plan were narrowed from a larger list of 37 potential restoration sites that were evaluated based upon characteristics such as likelihood of success, biodiversity and habitat composition, connectivity to other habitat types, allowable and compatible human uses, and current enforcement and compliance activities. Sites were selected based on the best available site-specific information, with the understanding that global-scale stressors such as climate change could affect the suitability of some sites for restoration in the future. Selecting sites representative of multiple reef types across a wide geographic range can help spread the risk of large-scale impacts. Additionally, consistent monitoring and adaptive management can aid in better understanding and responding to potential future climate impacts at each site.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 10

Figure 1: Seven Florida Keys reefs selected for Mission: Iconic Reefs.

Mapping and Measuring Habitat Zones After selecting the seven reef locations that include patch, mid-channel, and fore reef zones, the next step in the development process of the restoration plan was to identify the different habitat types, the amount of hardbottom habitat at each site, and to quantify the restorable area at each site by zone. Each reef site has its own unique composition of reef habitat zones, sandy areas, and depth ranges. Using a combination of three-dimensional imagery (LiDAR), aerial imagery, and satellite imagery, habitat zones as shown in Figure 2 that support different species of stony corals and restoration techniques were identified at each reef site. For detailed maps of each reef site please see Appendix II- Reef Habitat Mapping Data.

In-person verification was needed to refine the area of each habitat zone’s boundaries that was identified from the imagery. Over a period of several months, a groundtruthing campaign was undertaken to estimate the percentage of reef habitat in each zone, taking into account void spaces and sandy areas, and to estimate the Figure 2: Habitat zonation for Looe Key Iconic Reef Site. proportion of the reef habitat that would be restorable. Field data were used to ensure conditions estimated using imagery were consistent with actual conditions in each habitat zone, and to further refine the footprint of the existing reef structure. In all, between the seven reef sites, coral reef scientists vetted more than 120 locations to verify the amount of restorable reef area within each habitat

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 11 zone. Restorable area was defined as the proportion of reef habitat that is devoid of desirable species and otherwise suitable for restoration, or that can be prepared for restoration. For more information about habitat zonation, mapping and field verification, please see Appendix I- Methods.

Target Percent Cover With the groundtruthing effort complete and restorable areas estimated for each habitat zone, target percent coral cover and number of coral and non-coral organisms (grazers) needed for restoration could be calculated. Within each habitat zone and reef site, experts in local reef ecology estimated the goal for target percent coral cover by the end of Phase 2. These values were further refined based on existing literature on Florida Keys reef structure. Percent cover targets consider the unique biology and ecology of the coral types and habitat zones and are tailored to each site’s unique characteristics. Target species composition was based on the composition of the reef prior to coral die-offs that have occurred since the 1980s. Based on site characteristics, overall percent cover targets for each reef site were further refined into percent cover targets for each species group to be outplanted within a given zone as shown in Figure 3. For target percent cover and restorable area calculations for each reef site, please see Appendix II- Reef Habitat Mapping Data.

Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Looe Key Target # of Target # of Total Target Zone Restorable Area (m2) % Cover Corals % Cover Corals % Cover Shallow Reef Crest 3,620 5.00% 876 5.00% 710 10.00% Reef Crest 6,733 20.25% 7,109 14.25% 7,518 34.50% Spur and Groove - Top 20,294 13.60% 23,085 6.65% 20,645 20.25% Spur and Groove - Sides 19,910 1.50% 10,490 5.00% 28,469 6.50% Forereef Terrace 6,094 9.66% 5,912 9.84% 10,814 19.50% Deep Reef 787 3.75% 322 4.75% 708 8.50%

TOTAL 57,438 47,794 68,864 GRAND TOTAL 116,658

Figure 3: Looe Key Reef target increase in coral cover by habitat zone and phase.

Existing techniques available for propagating each coral type targeted for restoration were also considered. This informed the proportion of effort toward restoration of each species group in Phase 1 and Phase 2. For example, propagation techniques for elkhorn and staghorn corals are well-developed, therefore greater effort was shifted toward outplanting these in Phase 1.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 12 Number of Corals Using the Phase 1 and Phase 2 target percent coral goals for each coral species in each habitat zone, the number of corals needed for each phase could be determined. For example, in the reef crest habitat zone at the Looe Key restoration site, the overall target coral cover for elkhorn coral is 27.50%, with 20.00% cover restored by the end of Phase 1 and 7.50% cover restored by the end of Phase 2. To calculate the number of corals needed to restore the elkhorn species in Phase 1, the target cover of 20% for elkhorn coral in Phase 1 was applied to the reef crest habitat zone restorable area of 6,733 m2 resulting in a restorable area target of 1,347 m2 for elkhorn coral. To achieve a total cover of 1,347 m2 for elkhorn coral in the Looe Key reef crest zone by the end of Phase 1, approximately 6,518 corals should be outplanted. The number of coral outplants needed to achieve this target was calculated using the initial size of an outplant cluster, factoring in annual growth rates and average mortality figures that were determined using data from local restoration practitioners. Corals will be outplanted to the reefs as clusters of several colonies. The clusters will fuse together to form one larger, reproductive coral colony. The number of corals detailed in Figure 3 and in Appendix II materials represent the number of clusters of which each cluster will contain several coral colony fragments.

Beginning with reef locations that meet certain criteria to support restoration goals, including human-use goals, sets the stage for a successful plan. Developing a restoration resource budget from the ground-up, working to methodically calculate actual reef habitat that is restorable, and following literature and local knowledge in conjunction with the best available restoration science has resulted in a scientifically-based plan for restoration.

The Plan Phase 1 A/B Phase 2 ACTION: Add rapid-growing corals ACTION: Add slower-growing corals DURATION: 5-7 Years of Work DURATION: 10-12 Years of Work 10-YR GOAL: ~15% cover 20-YR GOAL: ~25% cover Restorable # of Corals # of Grazers # of Corals # of Grazers Region Reef Area (sq m) Planted Added Planted Added

Upper Carysfort Reef 125,890 112,228 94,982 93,026 94,982 Keys Horseshoe Reef 12,223 16,139 5,696 19,556 5,696

Middle Cheeca Rocks 12,414 12,209 15,517 21,783 15,517 Keys Sombrero Reef 13,461 11,842 10,096 13,267 10,096 Looe Key Reef 57,438 47,794 43,078 68,864 43,078 Lower Newfound Harbor 8,447 4,599 11,066 9,429 11,066 Keys Eastern Dry Rocks 36,337 30,667 21,633 35,917 21,633

Subtotal 266,209 235,479 202,068 261,842 202,068

Figure 4: Number of corals and grazers to be added to each reef site during Phase 1 and during Phase 2.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 13 Propagation and Production To produce the nearly 500,000 clusters of stony corals required to fulfill the target increases in coral cover in Phase 1 and Phase 2, corals will be propagated in land and ocean- based coral nurseries. In addition to annual expected mortality, redundancy is built into the number of coral clusters needed to account for potential mortality events caused by hurricanes or disease. This is reflected in the survivorship calculation, which drives the number of coral clusters needed to restore each habitat type. Furthermore, the corals selected for Photo: Mote Marine Laboratory & Aquarium. propagation are the genetic survivors of previous Caribbean coral disease and thermal bleaching events, adding to the resiliency of the ecosystem.

For corals that are propagated asexually using fragmentation, it is estimated that each coral fragment will grow in the coral nursery for approximately one year before being outplanted as part of a cluster to the reef. Among the several Florida organizations involved in coral restoration, there are already Photo: Coral Restoration Foundation. ocean-based nurseries throughout the upper, middle, and lower keys as well as land-based facilities located in the Florida Keys and in multiple Central and South Florida locations. This existing infrastructure can be leveraged during Phase 1A and Phase 1B to begin immediate propagation of corals. Together, these facilities are currently producing tens of thousands of stony corals per year. Infrastructure will be expanded to scale-up the production of corals to meet the total demand across Phases 1 and 2. Photo: Coral Restoration Foundation.

Site Preparation and Outplanting Prior to outplanting corals to a reef site, the substrate will be prepped by removing marine debris and invasive and nuisance species, such as thick mats of fleshy algae, turf algae, and Palythoa, from the reef. Palythoa is an organism that creates “mats” on available substrate and is a fierce

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 14 competitor for space on the reef, readily overgrowning corals and preventing settlement of coral recruits (Ladd et al., 2019). By removing these species, the growing corals won’t have to expend as much energy fighting for reef space. Each reef’s Implementation Plan will be specific with regard to which nuisance species will be removed to so as not to leave the substrate exposed to more erosion.

After a reef site has been prepped, clusters of corals will be outplanted to the site. The number of corals per cluster will vary by species. Each species of stony coral being restored as part of the Plan has different rates of growth, different husbandry requirements, and varying turn-over rates during the nursery process. While the process for restoring each species will generally follow the same path, the time and labor during each step of the process can vary considerably from one species to another. As each of the species chosen for restoration play a different role in the ecological function and heritage of the Florida Keys reef system, it is important that they are all included in the Plan, making this a truly unique and unprecedented approach.

Maintenance, Monitoring, and Adaptive Restoration Requirement by Species Management (# of Mature Corals) Coral Restoration Components Phase 1 Phase 2 Total From the time that the first round of corals are outplanted onto the reef sites, regular Elkhorn Coral 104,152 26,264 130,417 maintenance of the restored sites will begin. Star Coral 50,616 89,505 140,121 Similar to tending a garden, routine Brain Coral 30,660 51,957 82,617 maintenance at each site will be a necessary Pillar Coral 1,869 2,248 4,118 step towards successful restoration of reef Staghorn Coral 48,181 15,244 63,425 function, structure, and diversity. Monthly Other Small Stony Coral 0 76,624 76,624 maintenance will include removal of nuisance Other 0 0 0 species, coral predators, and marine debris, Totals 235,479 261,842 497,321 and the reattaching of damaged and disconnected corals. Figure 5: Stony coral restoration requirements by species. In addition to regular site maintenance, ongoing performance monitoring and adaptive Other Components management will ensure that successes and Phase 1 Phase 2 Total failures can be incorporated into upcoming Sea Urchins 188,107 188,107 376,213 steps, providing a process for continuous (# of Animals) Caribbean King Crab 13,962 13,962 27,923 improvement. Permanent monitoring plots will (# of Animals) be established and comprehensive monitoring Site Preparation 1,089 544 1,633 of 20% of each habitat zone in each site track (# of Days) Monitoring 1,775 1,775 3,549 progress toward the restoration goals. Adaptive (# of Days) management actions will be incorporated as Figure 6: Other restoration plan components needed based upon monitoring results. by phase.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 15

Community Engagement Mission: Iconic Reefs is designed to utilize local businesses designated as Blue Star Operators to further build community and visitor engagement. Blue Star operators are committed to responsible tourism, promoting responsible and sustainable diving and fishing practices in Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Mission: Iconic Reefs will benefit from local marine stewards and encourages community involvement, mobilizing volunteers to assist with invasive species removal and long-term nursery and outplant maintenance. In addition to utilizing community Photo: Coral Restoration Foundation. involvement if fully implemented this plan will create hundreds of new jobs in Monroe County.

Iconic Reefs Implementation Bringing together all of the components of the Plan including the propagation and outplanting of hundreds of thousands of stony corals and grazers, the expansion of land and ocean based infrastructure, research and development, and reef site preparation and maintenance will require a redirection of existing efforts as well as novel resources. Mission: Iconic Reefs will be supported through many public and private funding streams and executed by multiple organizations using a partnership approach. We propose that this public-private partnership be coordinated by collection of stakeholders, managers, and citizens and be known as the Florida Keys Restoration Council. Phase 1 ACTION: Add rapid-growing corals As this restoration strategy looks at the total DURATION: 5-7 Years of Work requirements necessary to achieve the Plan’s goals, it is 10-YR GOAL: ~15% cover important to also present a high level budget estimate so Region Reef Total interested parties can evaluate their potential for Carysfort Reef $45,803,168 involvement. To provide a sense of scale of the Plan, a Upper Keys Horseshoe Reef $5,781,215 detailed breakdown of estimated costs for the major line items of Mission: Iconic Reefs can be found in Appendix Middle Cheeca Rocks $5,050,929 III- Cost Estimate. The Cost Estimate was developed Keys Sombrero Reef $4,989,497

based on real-world experience with large scale Looe Key Reef $19,976,449 restoration projects in the Florida Keys and includes Lower Newfound Harbor $2,453,280 considerations for economies of scale and process Keys improvements that result in additional savings to be Eastern Dry Rocks $13,214,134 expected when executing a project of this scale. Subtotal $97,268,672

Figure 7: Estimated total cost for Phase 1 of Mission: Iconic Reefs.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 16 The average cost to restore one square meter of reef under this plan is comprised of 70% for coral and non-coral species restoration, 25% for monitoring, maintenance, and adaptive management, and 5% for site preparation. As expected, the highest proportion of cost is for species restoration and it is in this area that the most opportunity exists for process improvements and technological advances. Restoration practitioners, NOAA, and other partners are actively working on efforts to further increase efficiency beyond what is estimated in the current Plan. Partners executing this project are committed to rapidly operationalizing new techniques with the hope of incrementally reducing costs and using those savings to execute the Plan faster.

Each component of the Plan is critical to improving the ecosystem function of the seven iconic Florida Keys reefs so that the reefs can once again provide habitat for countless marine organisms, provide our coastal communities with protection from storms and support ample tourism opportunities.

Conclusion & How You Can Help Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys is a unique and achievable strategy to restore seven reef sites located in one of America’s most iconic natural places. As a region that is sustained by its productive coastline, drawing in millions of tourists each year, the Florida Keys community understands the issue and its urgency, and asked for bold action to restore Florida Keys coral reefs. The strategies outlined in Mission: Iconic Reefs use the best available restoration science and allow for research and development to occur concurrently with phases of active construction. Supported by the existing work of local partners, the Plan can start immediately while the necessary increases in capacity, infrastructure, and production are established over the next few years. Mission: Iconic Reefs will foster a new economic sector for the Florida Keys region, centered around this innovative and crucial effort. This sector will not only sustain the reef, it will create new economic opportunities throughout the region and sustain the existing marine economy. By supporting the implementation of Mission: Iconic Reefs, you can help create a lasting legacy, a physical and financial safety net for the Florida Keys, and be a part of a vision that is sure to inform restoration efforts worldwide. Photo: Coral Restoration Foundation.

Restoring Seven Iconic Reefs: A Mission to Recover the Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys | Page 17 APPENDIX I. METHODS

Overall Effort Mission: Iconic Reefs is a product of a public/private partnership of subject matter experts from government, academia, and the private sector to evaluate the opportunities and plan for comprehensive reef-scale restoration in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. That group, comprised of over two dozen experts representing over ten organizations, convened multiple times over six months to craft a bold vision for restoration.

The expert group was guided by its past experience in reef-scale restoration planning, input from the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council, and the principles outlined in the recently published Manager’s Guide to Coral Reef Restoration Planning & Design from The Nature Conservancy.

The group worked methodically to first narrow the sites under consideration and then map different habitat zones at each reef in detail. This allowed the team to analyze historical, current, and potential coral condition at each site. The site goals and maps were ground truthed in the field to further refine restoration targets. All of this information and the collective experience of restoration practitioners in the Florida Keys over the past 15 years was used to develop an approach that calculates the restoration requirements for each reef and zone over the course of an initial ten year effort (Phase 1) and a longer-term 20 year target (Phase 2). This Plan will not end with outplanting: to ensure long-term success, the team affirmed the need for long-term site stewardship, monitoring, adaptive management, and resources for disaster recovery.

Site Selection Overview Significant declines in coral health from a number of stressors prompted the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council (SAC), representing users and constituents, to identify 37 areas within FKNMS as high priorities for coral restoration. NOAA and partners undertook a process to refine that recommendation and develop a plan that could be implemented by a broad coalition of resource managers, restoration practitioners and the public.

Approach As part of the Mission: Iconic Reefs planning effort, NOAA hosted two dozen coral restoration practitioners and managers to identify comprehensive, non-resource-constrained restoration strategies and to narrow the list of 37 high priority areas within the FKNMS (Table 1). The team was also asked to rank the most important criteria for reef restoration that the sites should host (Table 2). The most important criteria identified were: 1) biodiversity and habitat, 2) ecological services - diversity, 3) sustainability and connectivity, 4) likelihood of success, and 5) genetic

Appendix I | Page 18 health/complexity. The team considered the ranked criteria and specific information about each site. Also discussed were current conditions, habitat, history, ecological and research potential importance, accessibility, constituent use, and community support. Sites with significant constituent support were prioritized if they met the other guiding criteria. Seven sites were chosen with geographic representation in the Upper, Middle, and Lower Keys; these sites include patch, mid-channel, and offshore reefs.

Sites were selected based on the best available information regarding site characteristics, however practitioners and managers recognize that global-scale stressors such as climate change could affect the suitability of some sites for restoration in the future. To address this uncertainty, the team selected sites from multiple reef types (i.e. patch and fore reefs), located across a broad geographic range. This strategy could help to mitigate the risk of large-scale disturbance, particularly if one site type or geographic location is more susceptible to a given stressor than others. Post-restoration monitoring will also provide information on climate impacts at each site, which can feed back into adaptive, site-specific restoration planning. Table 1. The 37 high priority areas from which the 7 iconic reef sites were selected.

Turtle Reef, Pennekamp (East Ocean Reef) Mid-Channel patch reef - State Waters Carysfort Reef - North Reef Margin/Fore Reef Elbow Reef, North (Elpis) Reef Margin/Fore Reef Key Largo Dry Rocks Reef Margin/Fore Reef French Reef Reef Margin/Fore Reef Upper Keys Molasses Reef - North Wellwood Restoration Reef Margin/Fore Reef Molasses Reef Reef Margin/Fore Reef Snapper Ledge Reef Margin/Fore Reef Davis Reef Reef Margin/Fore Reef Hen and Chickens Mid-Channel patch reef Cheeca Rocks Inshore Patch Reef South of Lower Matecumbe Reef Margin/Fore Reef Caloosa Rocks Inshore Patch Reef Tennessee Reef Reef Margin/Fore Reef Middle Keys South of Little Duck Key Spur and Groove. Seagrass Coffins Patch Offshore Patch Reef South of Key Colony Beach/Marker 48 Mid-Channel Patch Reef Delta Shoal Reef Margin/Fore Reef Sombrero Key Reef Margin/Fore Reef Newfound Harbor SPA Inshore Patch Reef Looe Key Reef SPA Reef Margin/Fore Reef American Shoal Reef Reef Margin/Fore Reef Pelican Shoal Reef Margin/Fore Reef Hawk Channel Patch Reefs 1 Mid-Channel Patch Reef Lower Keys Boca Chica Patch Reefs Inshore Patch Reef Key West Patch Reefs Inshore Patch Reef Western Sambo 1 Reef Margin/Fore Reef Western Sambo 2 Reef Margin/Fore Reef Eastern Dry Rocks 1 (general SPA area) Reef Margin/Fore Reef Rock Key 1 (general SPA area) Reef Margin/Fore Reef Sand Key 1 Reef Margin/Fore Reef Cottrell Key Backcountry, Hardbottom Man Key Patch Reefs Inshore Patch Reefs Marquesas Western Dry Rocks Reef Margin/Fore Reef Boca Grande Patch Reef Inshore Patch Reefs East of DTNP Pulaski Shoals Coral Reef slope, hardbottom Tortugas Dry Tortugas National Park

Appendix I | Page 19 Table 2. Ranking of criteria important to selecting a restoration site by 18 reviewers.

What criteria are most important for reef A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R TOTAL restoration? Ecological Services: Shoreline protection 3 2 1 3 3 3 1 3 2 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 36

Ecological Services: Fisheries habitat 2 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 1 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 3 41 Ecological Services: Tourism value (both aesthetics 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 2 38 and stewardship potential) Ecological Services: Ecological diversity 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 49

Likelihood of success 3 ? 3 3 3 ? 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 46 Biodiversity and habitat (what can be built, not 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 53 necessarily what is already there) Sustainability/connectivity 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 49

Sufficient size 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 37

Allowable/compatible uses (at time of restoration) 2 2 2 2 1 ? 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 ? 2 1 2 1 26

Suitability as reference areas/monitoring sites 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 ? 3 2 2 2 31

Facilitation of enforcement and compliance 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 2 2 2 30

Adjacent habitats appropriate for restoration 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 29

Genetic health/complexity 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 1 3 3 2 2 2 2 43 Ability to manage uses within restoration area 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 2 3 3 2 3 2 37 (closures, removal of buoys etc.) Interest of community or other partners with 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 1 1 2 2 3 3 1 3 1 37 resources Geographic separation 1 3 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 3 2 3 1 1 1 32 Adequate information about habitat across the entire 1 1 2 2 ? 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 23 reef area

Outcome The seven identified reefs (Table 3) are the starting point for this bold and ambitious plan to restore the diverse and economically valuable marine ecosystem of the Florida Keys. These sites represent what was once the best of the Florida Keys, and will demonstrate how restoration can support a vibrant, sustainable local economy into the future. Table 3. The seven “iconic” reef sites.

Reef Complex Habitat Type

Carysfort Reef Complex Reef Margin/Fore Reef Upper Keys Horseshoe Reef Mid-Channel Patch Reef Cheeca Rocks Inshore Patch Reef Middle Keys Sombrero Key Reef Margin/Fore Reef Looe Key Reef Margin/Fore Reef Lower Keys Newfound Harbor Patches Inshore Patch Reef Eastern Dry Rocks Reef Margin/Fore Reef

Appendix I | Page 20 Mapping and Field Verification Overview Identification of potentially restorable reef habitat (hereafter referred to as hardbottom) within selected potential restoration sites was completed in three steps: 1) define and map hardbottom reef habitat, 2) refine and ground truth reef habitat mapping classifications, and 3) generate summary statistics. For each site, hardbottom habitats were identified based on configuration (derived from LiDAR where coverage existed) and remotely-sensed imagery (i.e., aerial and satellite images). Expert knowledge and imagery helped define hardbottom habitats at sites without LiDAR. For all sites, hardbottom habitats were further refined and confirmed using georeferenced underwater images and site visits.

Approach Habitat mapping to support identification of potentially restorable reef habitats and zones included both mapping classification using remote sensing data and in-water validation. The most recent LiDAR bathymetric data were compiled (1 m resolution; NGS 2016); LiDAR coverage included five of seven sites. Summary statistics (e.g., max, mean, min) of depth, planar area, and surface area were calculated from the bathymetry at sites within the LiDAR coverage. Draft hardbottom habitat was categorized using supervised classification habitat mapping in e-Cognition software. Hardbottom areas were further classified into categories such as low relief reef, high relief reef, spur and groove tops, and spur and groove sides. Figure 1 is an example of this process. For the two sites without LiDAR bathymetry coverage (i.e., Cheeca Rocks and Newfound Harbor), draft habitat types were identified using remote sensing (i.e., aerial and satellite imagery) and local expertise.

Figure 1. Example of hardbottom identification and categorization from Sombrero Key. Using the best available LiDAR bathymetry (shown above far left) and other derived data surfaces, such as rugosity, areas of hardbottom (shown as pink in middle image) and not hardbottom (white regions in middle image) were identified at each site. Using a supervised classification approach with e-Cognition and additional processing of LiDAR, aerial and satellite imagery, and ground verification data, hardbottom habitats were further refined and classified into specific categories (shown by various colors in the far right image, including: rubble, spur and groove tops, spur and groove sides, deep reef).

Appendix I | Page 21 Groundtruthing of hardbottom reef habitat classifications was performed using recent (post- Hurricane Irma 2017) georeferenced photos, photomosaics, and videos shared from coral restoration practitioners, coral reef monitoring efforts (e.g., NOAA’s National Coral Reef Monitoring Program 2018), and other government researchers. Additional field data for groundtruthing were provided by the field team (120 reference locations), which collected photos both at pre-identified coordinates and at additional geo-referenced locations selected during the field effort. The field team also provided expert local knowledge of habitats at reef sites based on site visits. Georeferenced photos were then imported into ArcPro and compared to mapped hardbottom habitat classifications. Reef classifications were refined based on groundtruthing data.

Figure 2. Example of a georeferenced photo used to classify hardbottom habitat at Carysfort Reef. Each pink triangle represents a site where photos were provided.

Outcome The habitat mapping efforts identified and classified reef hardbottom habitats and reef surface areas. These data were then used to identify reef zones and calculate reef restoration area.

Appendix I | Page 22 Zonation Overview Restoration zones were delineated based on expert local knowledge and refined based on bathymetry, habitat mapping, management zones, field validation, and consideration of potential restoration options. Zones were initially outlined by a panel of local experts, and subsequent refinements were presented to this panel for comment. For each site, the proportion of reef habitat and proportion of restorable reef was applied to the total area of each zone to determine the final proposed restoration area.

Approach Zones for potential restoration options were initially identified by experts at the first in-person project meeting. Coral reef scientists, managers, and coral restoration practitioners discussed the ecological zonation and coral species distributions (historic and present) for each potential site in relation to potential coral restoration actions. Experts outlined and drafted potential restoration zones at each site using an interactive pen (eBeam Edge), Google Earth, and ArcGIS. Experts referenced local expertise, Google Earth aerial imagery, bathymetric LiDAR depth ranges, long-term coral monitoring, and current coral restoration efforts. After the meeting, draft zones were refined by removing gaps between zones, identifying depth ranges within zones, comparing depths with target species and with coral monitoring data, adjusting zones along bathymetric contours, and adjusting draft zones in reference to current FKNMS management zonation (e.g., boundaries of Sanctuary Preservation Areas). For each site, draft restoration zonation was then cross-referenced with the hardbottom habitat classifications and field validation for further refinement. During the field groundtruthing effort, a field team provided estimates on proportion of reef habitat (i.e., the percentage of the mapped habitat that is actually hardbottom) within each zone, and proportion of restorable reef (i.e., the percentage of reef habitat that is devoid of desirable species and otherwise suitable for restoration) within each zone.

Figure 3. An example of the zonation approach at Sombrero Reef: Initial delineation based on expert knowledge (left); refined zones that fully encompass hardbottom habitats and eliminate gaps but do not include ground-validation (center); final zonation including priority restoration hardbottom habitats (right).

Appendix I | Page 23 For each final zone, the proposed restoration area was calculated from the mapped surface area (m2), the proportion of reef habitat, and an estimate of restorable reef area.

Outcome This zonation process resulted in the identification of restoration zones at each reef site. For spur and groove reefs, zones included shallow reef crest, reef crest, spur and groove (tops of spurs), spur and groove (sides of spurs), forereef terrace, deep reef, patch reef, back reef, and rubble zones. For inshore patch reefs, zones included reef crest, forereef terrace, patch reef, shallow and deep boulder coral zones, and back reef. In general, these zones are compliant with the 2012 federal Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard. Restoration areas were calculated for each site based on habitat classification (i.e., area), zonation, reef habitat coverage (%), and proportion of restorable reef (%).

Zone Targets by Phase Overview A foundational element of this effort was to identify achievable restoration targets for each reef site. Literature and expert opinion informed the identification of target percent coral cover for each zone within each reef site. These targets took into consideration the unique biology and ecology of the species and zones. Further, the existing techniques for propagating particular corals were considered, informing the timing at which they would be appropriate to be employed. Together, this information resulted in overall and phased targets for percent coral cover in each of the zones within each reef. The team also identified targets for how much of the restorable area may receive grazers to control algal growth. This decision was based on historical data, status of propagation techniques, and expert opinion.

Approach As a first step, the scientific literature was consulted to identify historical data on the cover (%) of corals and grazers at each reef site. As expected, the literature did not yield information for the same spatial scales and habitat zones being considered. However, for most reef sites, there was some information to provide a historical perspective. This information served as the initial discussion point for the participants. From there, the realities of the existing conditions and achievable results based on existing techniques, individual species life histories, and ecology of the zones were considered. A consensus of coral percent cover target was then selected for each zone. Similarly, a target for the percentage of restorable area to receive grazers was also set. It became apparent that interim targets should also be identified, given the reality that 20 years of active restoration would likely be required to achieve selected targets.

Appendix I | Page 24

Figure 4. Depiction of the phased approach to meeting the overall targets at a reef site.

Thus, a phased approach to achieving the targets was identified (see Figure 4). The overall targets were apportioned into two phases, based on the same considerations identified above. The overall targets were further refined by identifying focal coral species groups for restoration: elkhorn coral, star coral, brain coral, pillar coral, staghorn coral, and other small stony coral. A percent cover target was assigned for each species group. For example, reef sites and zones where it is appropriate to focus on elkhorn coral outplanting were heavily apportioned to Phase 1 because the techniques are established and will increase coral cover relatively quickly. In contrast, small stony coral targets were primarily apportioned to Phase 2 due to the need to continue developing propagation techniques. Table 4 provides an example of the results of target setting and apportionment for one zone at one reef.

Table 4. Example of apportionment of the percent cover targets by species within a zone at a reef site.

Phase 1 Phase 2 Completion Target (10 Years) (20 Years) Target % Cover Increase 19.75% 16.83% 2.92% Elkhorn Coral 10.00% 10.00% 0.00% Star Coral 2.00% 0.50% 1.50% Brain Coral 1.00% 0.25% 0.75% Pillar Coral 0.25% 0.08% 0.17% Staghorn Coral 6.00% 6.00% 0.00% Other Small Stony Coral 0.50% 0.00% 0.50%

Appendix I | Page 25

Outcome This step in the process resulted in the production of percent cover targets for each coral species group by zone by reef site for all of the seven iconic reef sites.

Requirements Calculations Overview To define the scope, scale, and effort required for the restoration of the reef sites, three core metrics were identified: 1) the level of effort necessary to prepare a site for restoration; 2) the number of corals by species group that would be necessary to achieve a particular site’s goals; and 3) the number of grazers (herbivores such as sea urchins and crabs) that will be necessary to prevent algal overgrowth. These requirements were calculated by looking at the restorable area of each zone relative to the restoration targets for each zone and the expected survival and growth of the restored organisms. Results are presented as the number of coral colonies or number of animals (for herbivores) that are necessary within each zone at each site.

Approach Step 1: In order to calculate restoration requirements, the team took the results of the reef by zone mapping and the site verification surveys to determine an area of restorable habitat per zone for each reef (see Table 5).

Table 5. Example of the reef by zone mapping results.

Min Max Surface % Reef Restoration Reef Zone % Restorable Depth (m) Depth (m) Area (m2) Habitat Area (m2)

Shallow Reef Crest -0.7 -4.4 17,236 70% 30% 3,620

Reef Crest -1.6 -7.7 10,688 90% 70% 6,733

Spur and Groove - Top -1.9 -9.5 32,212 90% 70% 20,294

Looe Spur and Groove - Sides -2.1 -9.6 36,871 90% 60% 19,910 Key Forereef Terrace -6.1 -12.7 67,708 60% 15% 6,094

Deep Reef -9.7 -14.7 8,746 60% 15% 787

Backreef -0.8 -3.2 753 50% 0% 0

Totals 174,214 57,438

Step 2: Site preparation requirements were determined by considering all of the elements on a reef that would need to be addressed prior to restoration could begin. These consist of biotic elements that are currently occupying the substrate in areas identified to be restored (e.g., Palythoa spp., turf algae). A matrix was developed to qualitatively rank each element in terms of its abundance within each reef zone at each site. These individual element rankings resulted in

Appendix I | Page 26 a final site preparation score indicating the level of effort necessary to prepare the site to receive restoration (i.e., coral outplants).

Step 3: The next step was to determine the number of organisms required to achieve restoration targets for each reef and zone identified above. A worksheet was created for each reef and a set of calculations were run for each zone. This work took the “Restorable Area” of each zone and multiplied it by the “Target % Cover Increase” for each species group and each phase of work within the zone. This resulted in an “Area of Restored Coral” necessary to achieve the “Completion Target” (see Table 6).

Table 6. Example worksheet for calculating the required number of corals by species for one zone at one reef site.

Zone 3 - Looe Key - Spur and Groove - Top

Restorable 20,294 Coral Restoration Component Area (sq mi)

Completion Phase 1 (10 Years) Phase 2 (20 Years) Target Area of Area of Restoration Restoration Target % Restored Restored 20.25% 13.60% Requirement Method 6.65% Requirement Method Cover Coral Coral (clusters/heads) (clusters/heads) (sq m) (sq m) Combination Combination asexual asexual Elkhorn 10.00% 8.00% 1,623 7,587 outplanting 2.00% 406 1,592 outplanting Coral & sexual & sexual propogation propogation Reskinning Reskinning Star Coral 2.00% 1.00% 203 7,128 1.00% 203 5,494 substrate substrate Reskinning Reskinning Brain Coral 1.00% 0.50% 101 3,564 0.50% 101 2,747 substrate substrate Asexual Asexual Pillar Coral 0.25% 0.10% 20 607 0.15% 30 634 outplanting outplanting Staghorn 6.00% 4.00% 812 3,929 2.00% 406 1,592 Coral Other Small Reskinning Reskinning 1.00% 0.00% 0 0 1.00% 203 8,585 Stony Coral substrates substrates Other 0.00% 0.00% 0 0.00% 0

Step 4: To determine the number of outplanted coral colonies or clusters necessary to achieve the target “Area of Restored Coral” values set per zone at each site, average growth and expected mortality values per species group were considered. The area occupied by an outplanted colony (or cluster) was estimated using the formula for the area of a circle, πr2 (see Figure 5).

Appendix I | Page 27 Values for initial colony (or cluster) diameter (d) at the time of outplanting were determined for each species group through discussion with practitioners and restoration experts with local knowledge. From these diameters, the radius (r) at the time of outplanting was calculated as r = 0.5(d). The area of a given colony at the time of outplanting (e.g., at year 1) was therefore equal to πr2.

Practitioners and restoration experts also estimated annual growth rates per species group (estimated annual increase in Figure 5. Image depicting how the estimated area of

colony diameter [di]). The annual increase a coral outplant was calculated using the formula for the area of a circle. in colony radius (ri) was calculated as ri =

0.5(di). After one year of growth (e.g., at 2 year 2), an outplanted colony’s size was calculated as π(r+ ri ) . After n years of growth (e.g., at 2 year n+1), an outplanted colony’s size was calculated as π(r+(n*ri )) .

Using these equations, estimated areal coverage of a colony from a given species group could be calculated based on the year in which the colony would be outplanted and the number of years of growth expected within a given time frame. Phase 1 (10 years) is used as an example throughout this section; however, values for Phase 2 (20 years) were generated using the same methods.

Phase 1 includes 6 years of active outplanting. Therefore, as an example, elkhorn colonies 2 outplanted in year 4 were estimated to cover an area of π(r+(6*ri )) by the end of Phase 1. Using initial colony size and growth values developed by experts, this equates to an estimated cover of 0.5 m2 for each elkhorn coral colony outplanted in year 4 by the end of Phase 1. Estimated areas at the end of Phase 1 were generated for colonies from each species group for each year that colonies were expected to be outplanted (e.g. years 1-6 of Phase 1).

For fast-growing species (e.g. staghorn and elkhorn corals), the maximum area was set at 1 m2. At a size of 1 m2, colonies are expected to grow into neighbors and/or undergo asexual fragmentation, ultimately forming continuous thickets.

For slower-growing species (e.g., star, brain, and small stony corals), a three year lag in growth was incorporated into these calculations to account for the time necessary for fragments in a cluster to fuse into a single colony (E. Muller, pers. comm.). As a result, areas for star, brain, and small stony coral colonies outplanted at year 1 were calculated assuming 7 total years of growth as a 25 cm-diameter colony (estimated diameter post-fusion) rather than 10 total years of growth for the full duration of Phase 1.

Appendix I | Page 28

Figure 6 below illustrates the relative sizes of corals outplanted at years 1-6 at the conclusion of Phase 1, as calculated using the method above (coral C1 = a coral outplanted at year 1). Corals outplanted at year 1 occupy greater area (and have a greater contribution to overall Area of Restored Coral compared to those outplanted in later years (which would have less years to grow post-outplant during the 10-year Phase 1 period).

Summation of the areas of corals C1-C6 provided a Total Area value per species group for the full Phase 1 period. Subsequent calculations assume that, for each species group, equal numbers of colonies would be outplanted during each year of the 6 year active outplanting portion of Phase 1.

Next, the Area of Restored Coral previously generated was adjusted to account for expected mortality among outplants. A value of 35% expected survival throughout the duration of Phase 1 was applied for each species group. The adjusted values for Area of Restored Coral were divided by the Total Area for a given species group, then multiplied by the total number of years of outplanting expected (e.g., 6 years for Phase 1). This calculation generated the number of corals (or clusters) required (i.e., Restoration Requirement). The full equation used to generate Restoration Requirements was therefore:

Restoration Requirement for Species Group X = ([Area of Restored Coral/Expected Survival]/Total Area for Species Group X) * Number of Years of Active Outplanting

An example of the use of this equation for Phase 1 is provided for elkhorn coral in the shallow reef crest zone at Looe Key:

Area of Restored Coral: 181 m2 Expected Survival: 0.35 Total Area for Phase 1 Elkhorn Coral: 3.54 m2 Number of Years of Active Outplanting: 6 Restoration Requirement = Figure 6. An illustration of the relative sizes of corals outplanted at ([181/0.35]/3.54) * 6 = 876 years 1-6 at the conclusion of Phase 1. C1 represents a coral outplanted at year 1, C2 represents a coral outplanted at year 2, colonies etc. The line marked as r represents the radius of colony C6. Corals outplanted earlier occupy greater area at the conclusion of Phase 1, as they have had more time to grow following outplanting.

Appendix I | Page 29 Step 5: The calculations outlined above allowed us to estimate the number of Coral Heads/Clusters that would need to be outplanted for each species group in each phase in order to achieve our Completion Target after taking into consideration coral growth and mortality.

Step 6: In addition to the outplanting of corals, we also estimated the number of grazers (i.e., long-spined sea urchins and Caribbean king crab) to be added to each site. The return of grazers to the reef is necessary to help return the reef from an algae dominated environment to a coral dominated environment. However the use of grazers in reef restoration is still in its infancy and much needs to be done to both advance their propagation and survival in addition to testing their effectiveness. Since this plan lays out a 20 vision for restoration of these sites it was necessary to take some still in development activities, such as the restoration of grazers, and project the requirements associated with the effort, even though the action is less ready than other project components.

This calculation was conducted by applying the target percent of restorable area to the restorable area for each zone at each site. Then a target number of individuals per square meter was applied to the target area. For sea urchins, a target of 3 per m2 was applied to 50% of the restorable area. For crabs, a target density of 1.5 per m2 was applied to 50% of the restorable area of patch reef sites only. Last, the results were apportioned between Phase 1 and Phase 2, in equal proportions. The results are the number of long-spined sea urchins and Caribbean king crabs required by reef zone per site and per phase.

As noted above the target grazer numbers were calculated to get a general sense of the scale required for future relocation or aquaculture work, including costs associated with such efforts. We recognize that substantial gaps in knowledge exist with regard to propagation and population enhancement of long-spined sea urchins and Caribbean king crabs. This activity is proposed only if research and development trials prove successful. As trials are completed, site- specific population targets will be developed and necessary adjustments will be made under adaptive management plans.

Outcome This work allowed us to calculate restoration requirements by species group within each zone at each site. This provided restoration targets to inform the level of effort necessary across the Iconic Reefs. However, it is important to note that the calculated values should not be considered absolute. Each reef site, or sections within sites, will have site-specific implementation plans that are informed by this overall effort but further refined for use within a given site. These plans will consider the reef on a section by section (spur by spur) basis, and targets, methodology, performance criteria, monitoring, and controls may be adjusted accordingly.

Appendix I | Page 30 Conclusion This document lays out the methods by which the team selected sites, mapped appropriate reef zones for restoration, identified the types and number corals required, and identified the types and numbers of grazers required. It provides the details on how the overall plan was developed and provides the context for the detailed electronic worksheets.

Appendix I | Page 31 APPENDIX II. REEF BY REEF HABITAT MAPPING AND SUMMARY

Carysfort North

Carysfort North Site Totals

Total Mapped Area (sq m) 259,601

Restorable Area of Reef (sq m) 54,088 Restoration Requirement Other Components (# of Mature Corals) Coral Restoration Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Components Sea Urchin Additions Elkhorn Coral 22,049 4,450 26,499 40,177 40,177 80,354 (# of Animals) Caribbean King Crab Star Coral 5,877 13,589 19,465 Additions 2,419 2,419 4,838 (# of Animals) Site Preparation Brain Coral 3,278 6,532 9,811 173 87 260 (# of Days) Pillar Coral 485 686 1,172 Monitoring (# of Days) 361 361 721 Staghorn Coral 12,740 2,188 14,928 Other Small Stony 0 12,081 12,081 Coral Other 0 0 0

Totals 44,429 39,526 83,955

Appendix II | Page 32 Carysfort South

Carysfort South Site Totals

Total Mapped Area (sq m) 257,778

Restorable Area of Reef (sq m) 71,802 Restoration Requirement Other Components (# of Mature Corals) Coral Restoration Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Components Sea Urchin Additions Elkhorn Coral 40,576 10,539 51,114 52,386 52,386 104,772 (# of Animals) Caribbean King Crab Star Coral 5,269 12,184 17,453 Additions 0 0 0 (# of Animals) Site Preparation Brain Coral 3,076 5,752 8,828 233 117 350 (# of Days) Monitoring (# of Pillar Coral 317 448 765 479 479 957 Days) Staghorn Coral 18,562 3,065 21,626 Other Small Stony 0 21,512 21,512 Coral Other 0 0 0

Totals 67,800 53,500 121,299

Appendix II | Page 33 Cheeca Rocks

Cheeca Rocks Site Totals Total Mapped Area (sq m) 82,759 Restorable Area of Reef (sq m) 12,414 Restoration Requirement Other Components (# of Mature Corals) Coral Restoration Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Components Sea Urchin Additions Elkhorn Coral 0 0 0 9,310 9,310 18,621 (# of Animals) Caribbean King Crab Star Coral 7,195 11,259 18,454 Additions 6,207 6,207 12,414 (# of Animals) Site Preparation Brain Coral 5,014 7,898 12,913 31 16 47 (# of Days) Monitoring Pillar Coral 0 0 0 83 83 166 (# of Days) Staghorn Coral 0 0 0 Other Small Stony 0 2,626 2,626 Coral Other 0 0 0

Totals 12,209 21,783 33,992

Appendix II | Page 34 Eastern Dry Rocks

Eastern Dry Rocks Site Totals Total Mapped Area (sq m) 166,797 Restorable Area of Reef (sq m) 36,337 Restoration Requirement Other Components (# of Mature Corals) Coral Restoration Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Components Sea Urchin Additions 15,302 4,403 19,705 21,633 21,633 43,266 Elkhorn Coral (# of Animals) Caribbean King Crab 6,126 8,320 14,445 Additions 0 0 0 Star Coral (# of Animals) Site Preparation 3,989 6,461 10,450 302 151 452 Brain Coral (# of Days) Monitoring 323 337 660 242 242 484 Pillar Coral (# of Days)

Staghorn Coral 4,927 4,373 9,300 Other Small Stony 0 12,024 12,024 Coral Other 0 0 0

Totals 30,667 35,917 66,585

Appendix II | Page 35 Horseshoe Reef

Horseshoe Site Totals

Total Mapped Area (sq m) 35,029

Restorable Area of Reef (sq m) 12,223 Restoration Requirement Other Components (# of Mature Corals) Coral Restoration Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Components Sea Urchin Additions Elkhorn Coral 6,382 1,686 8,068 4,584 4,584 9,167 (# of Animals) Caribbean King Crab Star Coral 3,871 6,725 10,596 Additions 1,112 1,112 2,225 (# of Animals) Site Preparation Brain Coral 3,271 6,140 9,411 34 17 51 (# of Days) Monitoring Pillar Coral 0 0 0 81 81 163 (# of Days) Staghorn Coral 2,615 462 3,077 Other Small Stony 0 4,543 4,543 Coral Other 0 0 0 Totals 16,139 19,556 35,695

Appendix II | Page 36 Looe Key

Looe Key Site Totals

Total Mapped Area (sq m) 174,214

Restorable Area of Reef (sq m) 57,438 Restoration Requirement Other Components (# of Mature Corals) Coral Restoration Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Components Sea Urchin Additions Elkhorn Coral 15,251 4,284 19,534 43,078 43,078 86,157 (# of Animals) Caribbean King Crab Star Coral 16,400 26,935 43,335 Additions 0 0 0 (# of Animals) Site Preparation Brain Coral 9,134 14,571 23,705 201 101 302 (# of Days) Monitoring Pillar Coral 607 634 1,241 383 383 766 (# of Days) Staghorn Coral 6,402 4,051 10,453 Other Small Stony 0 18,390 18,390 Coral Other 0 0 0

Totals 47,794 68,864 116,658

Appendix II | Page 37 Newfound Harbor

Newfound Harbor Site Totals

Total Mapped Area (sq m) 15,317 Restorable Area of Reef (sq m) 5,361 Restoration Requirement Other Components (# of Mature Corals) Coral Restoration Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Components Sea Urchin Additions 0 0 0 6,842 6,842 13,685 Elkhorn Coral (# of Animals) Caribbean King Crab 2,967 6,245 9,212 Additions 4,223 4,223 8,447 Star Coral (# of Animals) Site Preparation 1,243 1,945 3,188 35 18 53 Brain Coral (# of Days) Monitoring 0 0 0 56 56 113 Pillar Coral (# of Days)

Staghorn Coral 389 105 494 Other Small Stony 0 1,134 1,134 Coral Other 0 0 0

Totals 4,599 9,429 14,028

Appendix II | Page 38 Sombrero Reef

Sombrero Site Totals Total Mapped Area (sq m) 61,781 Restorable Area of Reef (sq m) 13,461 Restoration Requirement Other Components (# of Mature Corals) Coral Restoration Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Phase 1 Phase 2 Total Components Sea Urchin Additions Elkhorn Coral 4,593 903 5,496 10,096 10,096 20,192 (# of Animals) Caribbean King Crab Star Coral 2,912 4,249 7,161 Additions 0 0 0 (# of Animals) Site Preparation Brain Coral 1,654 2,658 4,313 79 40 119 (# of Days) Monitoring Pillar Coral 137 143 280 90 90 179 (# of Days) Staghorn Coral 2,546 1,000 3,545 Other Small Stony 0 4,314 4,314 Coral Other 0 0 0

Totals 11,842 13,267 25,109

Appendix II | Page 39 APPENDIX III. COST ESTIMATE

NARRATIVE

It is not expected that Mission: Iconic Reefs will be funded through one, or even a few, means. Rather, it’s likely that a mix of existing and new private and public sector funds will be combined to execute this effort. However, since this restoration strategy looks at the total requirements necessary to achieve the goals, it’s important to also present a high level budget estimate so would-be funders can evaluate their potential for involvement.

There were several overarching principles that guided the scoping of this effort. • Budget estimates based on actual experience with large scale restoration projects in the Florida Keys. Estimates however factor in additional economies of scale and process improvements that result in additional savings of 30-40% that can be expected when executing a mission of this scale. • All costs are based on a ten year project life and a 5% annual increase in expenses each year. • Restoration practitioners, NOAA, and other partners are actively working on efforts to further increase efficiency beyond what is reflected in the already aggressive budget estimates included here. Partners executing this project are committed to rapidly operationalizing new techniques with the hope of incrementally reducing costs and using those savings to execute the project faster and work at more sides.

Costs were looked at across the major areas of work associated with Mission: Iconic Reefs.

Site Preparation • During the field verification portion of the planning each zone within each site was visited. In addition to other information, one of the data points collected was the presence of nuisance and invasive species that would need to be removed prior to planting of corals or placement of grazers. • A score of 1-5 was generated for each zone that considered the level of effort necessary to remove nuisance and invasive species and prepare a site for restoration. For each zone score (1-5), we estimated the square meters of site that could be addressed with a single day of work by a 4 person dive team. • A score of 1 was considered “Minimal” and it was estimated that a 4 person dive team could prepare 500 sq meters per day, while a score of 5 was considered “Significant” where the same team could only prepare 100 sq meters per day. • The fully inclusive average cost for a site preparation team is estimated at $3,527 per day.

Appendix III | Page 40

Coral Restoration • Restoration of individual corals back to the reef is one of the major components of this mission and the primary metric by which restoration requirements were generated. • In order to develop an estimate of costs for this component of the effort we looked at our previous experience with each of the six major species groups that will be restored as part of the project. Each species has differing rates of growth, different husbandry requirements, and turn over in the nursery at very different rates. As such the cost for restoring one species can vary considerably from another, but as they each play very different roles on the reef it is important that they are all included as part of the package. • Costs range from near $100 a coral for the elkhorn and staghorn corals that grow quickly and can be raised exclusive in ocean based coral farms; while slower growing species such as star and brain coral that need to raised partially in shoreside laboratories have costs that exceed $500 per coral. • Overall the weighted average cost per coral restored is $259. • Costs of restoring an individual coral cover the full life cycle of that unit from sourcing, grow-out, all the way to outplanting.

Grazers • The return of grazers (long-spined sea urchins and Caribbean king crabs) to the reef is necessary to help return the reef from an algae dominated environment to a coral dominated environment. • However, the use of grazers in reef restoration is still in its infancy and much needs to be done to both advance their propagation and survival in addition to testing their effectiveness. • As this plan lays out a 20 year vision for the restoration of these sites, it was necessary to make some considerations for development activities, such as the restoration of grazers, and project the requirements associated with the effort, even though the action is less ready than other project components. • Even though there is a requirement listed for grazers, there is no intention to implement at that scale until appropriateness and effectiveness can be fully evaluated. • The costs for this component were developed in consultation with experts in ex situ culture of marine organisms. The cost of facility build-out, operations, and maintenance were considered assuming new facility on existing property. The costs and production were considered over an 8 year operational period. • Urchins are the most substantial portion of this effort, and therefore, were the basis of the overall grazer cost estimate. • Considering build-out and annual production, costs were estimated at $35 per grazer addition (urchin or crab).

Appendix III | Page 41 Site Maintenance • One of the major lessons learned of restoration work to date in the Florida Keys is that restoration is not a set and forget activity. When a terrestrial site is developed, whether it be into a restoration project, a park, or a golf course, it comes with a team that culls invasive species, takes out the trash, and generally keeps the site in an optimal condition. • 2-3 site maintenance teams will be established across the region and will spend every possible field day at their designated reef sites. Those teams will work alongside a volunteer workforce using the same models that have been used effectively for decades at terrestrial parks. • Site maintenance teams will include 2 divers and, in general, are assumed to be able to visit and conduct minor interventions and maintenance of 1,000 sq. m. per day. • Site maintenance teams will conduct maintenance at least once per month at each site. • Cost is $2,502 per day.

Monitoring • Monitoring to track successes and failures in order to inform mid-course corrections and adaptive management is critical to the long term success of any restoration effort. • 20% of each zone within each site will receive comprehensive monitoring. Permanent plots will be established and performance will be tracked against the restoration targets. • Monitoring teams will include 4 divers. Each team is expected to be able to evaluate 6 plots per day. • Over the course of 10 years, it is estimated that 20 dedicated monitoring events will be needed. This will allow for events 2-3 times per year during the initial establishment phase, annual monitoring during the outplanting years, and post-disturbance monitoring after major storms or other disturbances. • Site maintenance teams will also conduct site wide roving diver surveys during their work to provide insight into the performance of other areas of the site that are outside of the permanent monitoring plots. • Cost is $4,652 per day.

Adaptive Management and Disaster Recovery • As with any project there is a need for the ability to respond to unanticipated and unplanned events. Therefore, a contingency fund is necessary to protect the restoration investment. • 10% of the subtotal of all other costs.

Cost Estimate Details All costs are based on 180 field days per year and are fully inclusive of: • Divers, Surface Support, and a Vessel Captain

Appendix III | Page 42 • In-water, Shoreside, and Lab Facilities • Shoreside Personnel • Diving Equipment and Facilities • Vessels, Fuel, and Maintenance • Administration and Project management.

Phase 1A / 1B • Phase 1 is split into two phases. Phase 1A is focuses on elkhorn coral restoration in the appropriate zones, which occur at five of the seven Iconic Reef sites. Phase 1B balances the reef with other coral species and grazers. • Costs are apportioned based on the # of corals in 1A vs 1B.

Table 1. Summary cost per unit for each budget category.

Site Prep (Day) $3,527 Cost p/Coral $259 Monitoring (Day) $4,652 Maintenance (Day) $2,502 Grazers $36 Adaptive Mgt (% of subtotal) 10%

Table 2. Summary statistics for corals and grazers added by reef site.

Phase 1 A/B Phase 2 ACTION: Add rapid-growing corals ACTION: Add slower-growing corals DURATION: 5-7 Years of Work DURATION: 10-12 Years of Work 10-YR GOAL: ~15% cover 20-YR GOAL: ~25% cover Restorable # of Corals # of Grazers # of Corals # of Grazers Region Reef Area (sq m) Planted Added Planted Added

Upper Carysfort Reef 125,890 112,228 94,982 93,026 94,982 Keys Horseshoe Reef 12,223 16,139 5,696 19,556 5,696

Middle Cheeca Rocks 12,414 12,209 15,517 21,783 15,517 Keys Sombrero Reef 13,461 11,842 10,096 13,267 10,096 Looe Key Reef 57,438 47,794 43,078 68,864 43,078 Lower Newfound Harbor 8,447 4,599 11,066 9,429 11,066 Keys Eastern Dry Rocks 36,337 30,667 21,633 35,917 21,633

Subtotal 266,209 235,479 202,068 261,842 202,068

Appendix III | Page 43 Table 3. Summary statistics for site preparation and monitoring by reef site.

Phase 1 A/B Phase 2 ACTION: Add rapid-growing corals ACTION: Add slower-growing corals DURATION: 5-7 Years of Work DURATION: 10-12 Years of Work 10-YR GOAL: ~15% cover 20-YR GOAL: ~25% cover Site Site Site Site Restorable Region Reef Preparation Monitoring Preparation Monitoring Area (sq m) (Days) (Days) (Days) (Days)

Upper Carysfort Reef 125,890 407 839 203 839 Keys Horseshoe Reef 12,223 34 81 17 81

Middle Cheeca Rocks 12,414 31 83 16 83 Keys Sombrero Reef 13,461 79 90 40 90

Looe Key Reef 57,438 201 383 101 383 Lower Newfound Harbor 8,447 35 56 18 56 Keys Eastern Dry Rocks 36,337 302 242 151 242

Subtotal 266,209 1,089 1,775 544 1,775

Table 4. Budget for Phase 1 by reef site and budget category.

Phase 1 ACTION: Add rapid-growing corals DURATION: 5-7 Years of Work 10-YR GOAL: ~15% cover Site Coral Grazer Adaptive Region Reef Monitoring Maintenance Total Preparation Restoration Additions Mgt. Carysfort $1,434,002 $29,101,940 $3,419,340 $3,904,254 $3,779,707 $4,163,924 $45,803,168 Upper Reef Keys Horseshoe $119,533 $4,185,003 $205,057 $379,075 $366,983 $525,565 $5,781,215 Reef Cheeca $109,459 $3,165,963 $558,623 $384,995 $372,713 $459,175 $5,050,929 Middle Rocks Keys Sombrero $280,068 $3,070,743 $363,454 $417,479 $404,161 $453,591 $4,989,497 Reef Looe Key $710,247 $12,393,494 $1,550,820 $1,781,336 $1,724,511 $1,816,041 $19,976,449 Reef Lower Newfound $123,738 $1,192,572 $398,366 $261,967 $253,611 $223,025 $2,453,280 Keys Harbor Eastern Dry $1,063,795 $7,952,343 $778,794 $1,126,933 $1,090,984 $1,201,285 $13,214,134 Rocks Subtotal $3,840,843 $61,062,060 $7,274,454 $8,256,040 $7,992,670 $8,842,607 $97,268,672

Appendix III | Page 44 BIBLIOGRAPHY

Baums, I. B., Baker, A. C., Davies, S. W., Grottoli, A. G., Kenkel, C. D., Kitchen, S. A., ... & Parkinson, J. E. (2019). Considerations for maximizing the adaptive potential of restored coral populations in the western Atlantic. Ecological Applications, e01978.

Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (2018). Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Coral Reef Evaluation and Monitoring Project - CREMP. Retrieved from: https://myfwc.com/research/habitat/coral/cremp/

Knowlton, N. (2001). The future of coral reefs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98 (10) 5419-5425.

Ladd, M. C., Shantz, A. A., & Burkepile, D. E. (2019). Newly dominant benthic invertebrates reshape competitive networks on contemporary Caribbean reefs. Coral Reefs, 38(6), 1317- 1328.

Maya, P. H. M., Smit, K. P., Burt, A. J., & Frias-Torres, S. (2016). Large-scale coral reef restoration could assist natural recovery in Seychelles, Indian Ocean. Nature Conservation, 16, 1.

Miller, M. W., Baums, I. B., Pausch, R. E., Bright, A. J., Cameron, C. M., Williams, D. E., ... & Woodley, C. M. (2018). Clonal structure and variable fertilization success in Florida Keys broadcast-spawning corals. Coral Reefs, 37(1), 239-249.

National Academy of Sciences (2019). A Decision Framework for Interventions to Increase the Persistence and Resilience.

Reguero, B. G., Beck, M. W., Agostini, V. N., Kramer, P., & Hancock, B. (2018). Coral reefs for coastal protection: A new methodological approach and engineering case study in Grenada. Journal of environmental management, 210, 146-161.

SECORE International (n.d.). Coral reproduction. Retrieved from http://www.secore.org/site/corals/detail/coral-reproduction.15.html.

TBD Economics, LLC. (2019). The Economic Contribution of Spending in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary to the Florida Economy.

Tourist Development Council (2018). Visitor Profile Survey County-wide Annual Summary by Quarter January – December 2017/2018.

Bibliography | Page 45