Quick viewing(Text Mode)

The Rise and Fall of Proboscidean Ecological Diversity

The Rise and Fall of Proboscidean Ecological Diversity

Articles https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01498-w

The rise and fall of proboscidean ecological diversity

Juan L. Cantalapiedra 1 ✉ , Óscar Sanisidro 1, Hanwen Zhang 2,3, María T. Alberdi4, José L. Prado 5, Fernando Blanco 6 and Juha Saarinen7

Proboscideans were keystone Cenozoic megaherbivores and present a highly relevant case study to frame the timing and mag- nitude of recent against long-term macroevolutionary patterns. By surveying the entire proboscidean history using model-based approaches, we show that the dramatic explosion of proboscidean functional diver- sity was triggered by their biogeographical expansion beyond Africa. Ecomorphological innovations drove niche differentia- tion; communities that accommodated several disparate proboscidean species in sympatry became commonplace. The first burst of extinctions took place in the late Miocene, approximately 7 million years ago (Ma). Importantly, this and subsequent trends showed high ecomorphological selectivity and went hand in hand with palaeoclimate dynamics. The global extirpation of proboscideans began escalating from 3 Ma with further extinctions in Eurasia and then a dramatic increase in African extinctions at 2.4 Ma. Overhunting by may have served as a final double jeopardy in the late after climate-triggered extinction trends that began long before hominins evolved suitable hunting capabilities.

he worldwide extirpation of was a radical example, breadth of dietary preference and feeding envelope, food upheaval in the recent evolutionary history of terrestrial processing, energy requirements, home range, social grouping, ecosystems, with activities often con- sexual selection and locomotion mode). Based on these traits, and T 1,2 sidered culpable . Yet, understanding these extinctions in view through non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis, of long-term macroevolutionary dynamics of the megafauna lin- we constructed a two-dimensional (2D) functional morphospace eages has been critically lacking3. Proboscideans, being keystone of proboscideans that condenses 93% of their ecomorphological megaherbivores in Cenozoic terrestrial ecosystems, were among variation (Fig. 1a,b). A first empirical dimension of proboscidean the most affected groups. For centuries4,5, their fossil record elu- functional morphospace (NMDS-1) encapsulates greater den- cidated an evolutionary history of success and decline in equally tal masticatory durability (DMD), through increasing mesiodis- dramatic measures, with three endangered living species6 tal length, the number of transverse loph(id)s and relative crown representing a mere vestige of a once formidable high in both height (degree of hypsodonty) of the molars. These trends eventu- taxonomic diversity and ecomorphological disparity, which spread ally facilitated dentitions with a high proal shearing effectiveness across Africa, Eurasia and the Americas. Therefore, proboscidean during mastication, which was key to enhanced dietary plasticity poses an invaluable case study for palaeobiologists to and processing of low-quality food7–9. A second dimension reflects explore causes of uneven distribution in biodiversity across phy- larger-scale craniodental modifications, including but not limited logeny and evolutionary history. In this study, we comprehensively to: the development of sharp or obtuse dental loph(id)s; curvature re-examine the rich fossil record of proboscideans in its entirety of upper tusks; presence of shovel-like lower tusks; and elongated and investigate the interactions between proboscidean diversifica- mandible (Extended Data Fig. 2). This functional space yields eight tion and the timing and mode of their ecomorphological evolu- proboscidean functional types (PFTs), each representing a cluster tion. Our approach assesses clade- and community-level dynamics, of ecomorphologically similar species and thus experiencing simi- placing emphasis on the timing and processes behind the sudden lar evolutionary pressures10 (Fig. 1a–c and Extended Data Figs. 2 decimation of this group in the Quaternary. Our research presents a and 3). We reconstructed the global and continental diversifica- blueprint for evaluating any plausible impact of Pleistocene humans tion trajectories of proboscideans based on occurrence data11 and on megafauna extinctions1 against long-term macroevolutionary used multidimensional phylogenetic models12 to assess the mode of factors of decline. evolution of lineages across the aforementioned functional space. We compiled a dataset for extinct and living proboscidean taxa We inspected the mechanisms behind community assembly and with unprecedented detail, which consists of 185 species, 2,130 fos- disassembly processes using generalized linear mixed-effects sil occurrences and 17 ecomorphological traits (including body models (Methods). size, craniodental morphology, mastication mode, tusk morphol- ogy and foot posture; Extended Data Fig. 1) that pertain to mul- Early diversification and the dispersal outside Afro-Arabia. tiple fundamental aspects of proboscidean functional ecology (for During the first half of their history, until some 30 Ma, proboscideans

1Universidad de Alcalá, GloCEE - Global Change Ecology and Evolution Research Group, Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Madrid, Spain. 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Bristol, UK. 3Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK. 4Departamento de Paleobiología, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain. 5Instituto de Investigaciones Arqueológicas y Paleontológicas del Cuaternario Pampeano, Consejo Nacional de InvestigacionesCientíficas y Técnicas-Universidad Nacional del Centro de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Olavarría, Argentina. 6Museum fur Naturkunde, Leibniz-Institut fur - und Biodiversitatsforschung, Berlin, Germany. 7Department of Geosciences and Geography, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. ✉e-mail: [email protected]

1266 Nature Ecology & Evolution | VOL 5 | September 2021 | 1266–1272 | www.nature.com/natecolevol Nature Ecology & Evolution Articles

a

PFT 1 PFT 2 PFT 3 PFT 4 PFT 5 PFT 6 PFT 7 PFT 8 b c 0.4 First dispersals into Eurasia 10–400 kg >8,000 kg

0.2 PFT diversity

0 1.5

1.0 Major craniodental modificaitons (NMDS 2) 0.5 −0.2 Ecological diversity 0

−0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 60 50 40 30 20 10 8 6 4 2 0 DMD (NMDS 1) Time (Ma) d Global Africa Eurasia Americas 5.0 Insular forms excluded 2.0 Extinction 1.0 0.5

0.2 0.1 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Time (Ma) Time (Ma) Time (Ma) Time (Ma)

Fig. 1 | Ecological diversity and diversification in proboscideans. a, Reconstruction of representative genera for the eight PFTs, including their upper third molars (molars not shown to scale). PFT 1: , sub-lophodont with distinct cusps; PFT 2: , bilophodont molar with crenulated ridges; PFT 3: , longirostrine mandible with pronounced lower incisors, basic bunodont molar with rounded cusps; PFT 4: Mammut, brevirostrine mandible with lower incisors extremely vestigial or absent, zygodont molar (with ridged cusps); PFT 5: , longirostrine mandible with shovel-shaped lower incisors, bunolamellar molar; PFT 6: , brevirostrine mandible with lower incisors lost, complex bunodont molar achieving enhanced DMD; PFT 7: , brevirostrine mandible lacking lower incisors, brachydont (low-crowned) proal shearing molar consisting of numerous lamellae; PFT 8: , brevirostrine mandible lacking lower incisors, hypsodont (high-crowned) proal shearing molar consisting of numerous lamellae adjoined together by cementum. b, 2D functional space with colour-coded assignation to PFTs based on 17 ecomorphological traits. c, Species diversity of the PFTs through time (log-scaled), showing the timing of the PDE (grey bar), and ecological disparity measured as the sum of variances. d, Global and continental speciation and extinction rates through time; rates are log-scaled. The shaded areas represent 95% credible intervals. Artwork by O.S. were restricted to Afro-Arabia. Species diversity across this estimates should be read with caution given a sizable gap in the interval rose steadily but with no substantial ecological diversifica- record between around 51 and 40 Ma (see the broad 95% credibil- tion; only two out of the eight PFTs evolved. Despite a good cov- ity intervals in Fig. 1d). From then on, our estimates show that net erage in the early fossil record, initial diversification rate diversification was high compared to other mammalian clades13,14

Nature Ecology & Evolution | VOL 5 | September 2021 | 1266–1272 | www.nature.com/natecolevol 1267 Articles Nature Ecology & Evolution

(average diversification was 0.08 species per million years (Myr); In summary, increasing global ecomorphological diversity, com- Fig. 1d). In fact, this rate was sustained until the collapse of the bined with niche partitioning in sympatric proboscidean species, group in the Quaternary (Fig. 1d). Importantly, our global diver- produced high initial speciation rates in Eurasia and the Americas sification estimates aggregate clade-wise rate variations and do not and fuelled sustained net diversification in Africa. Together with the suggest rate homogeneity across lineages and geographical regions poor performance of phylogenetic models where ecomorphological (Fig. 1d). With diversity doubling every 9 Myr on average, we found evolution decelerates as a function of time (Extended Data Fig. 5), the little evidence of an asymptotic global carrying capacity constrain- multilayer approach presented in this study reinforces an expansion- ing proboscidean diversity (Extended Data Fig. 4), a scenario where ist scenario of global proboscidean diversification mediated by geo- speciation and extinction rates are expected to balance each other graphical dispersals, amelioration of local competition and relentless rendering zero net diversification15. The absence of a global diver- exploration of different functional ecomorphological adaptations. sity limit in proboscideans is likely the result of processes operating Local processes also impacted proboscidean macroevolution- at different scales: geographical expansion; local niche partitioning; ary patterns via ecology-mediated diversification. The dynamic and and ecology-dependent species survival. heterogeneous late Neogene and Quaternary biospheres imposed The latest Oligocene and early Miocene (25–20 Ma) witnessed more austere resource limitations, accelerating the evolution of the expansion of several proboscidean lineages beyond Afro-Arabia multi-loph(id) dentition optimized for effective proal shearing (termed ‘proboscidean datum event’ (PDE) by students of Eurasian (highest DMD) in stegodonts and elephantids (PFT 7 and 8)9,26. biochronology16; Fig. 1c). Current understanding of proboscidean As testified by successive peripatric speciation events during the evolution emphasizes the importance of the PDE since after this evolution of mammoths27,28, new adaptive responses of peripheral bio-event proboscideans became ubiquitous in megaherbivore populations to marginal conditions21 played a key role in the diver- guilds across Eurasia and Africa16–18. Around 16 Ma, proboscideans sification of the PFT 7 and PFT 8 taxa. At the broadest scale, our incurred into North America, setting a new biogeographical mile- ecology-dependent diversification models14 reveal that, with further stone. Alongside the progressive increase in seasonality and land- increasing DMD9, these taxa show higher macroevolutionary per- scape heterogeneity during the Neogene19, major biogeographical sistence as signified by higher speciation rate and moderate extinc- events like the PDE are expected to increase the global carrying tion risk (Fig. 2 and Extended Data Figs. 8 and 9), a finding that is capacity of clades20, boosting speciation opportunities21 and phe- consistent with the rapid expansion of PFT 6, 7 and 8 in the late notypic evolution22, stemming from the exposure to a wider array Neogene and Quaternary (Fig. 1c). Furthermore, ecology-selective of environmental settings and biotic interactions. However, to our survivorship alone (species sorting) is a macroevolutionary force knowledge, the impact of the PDE on proboscidean macroevolu- capable of influencing evolutionary trends29 and has probably been tionary patterns has never been quantified. To further explore the a major factor propelling lineages into unexplored regions of the relevance of the PDE, we used multidimensional phylogenetic pro- proboscidean functional space. cedures12 to test scenarios of unconstrained, decelerating and con- strained evolution, as well as a suite of models where African lineages Late Neogene turnover. The onset of C4 grass-dominated habitats evolved in a different fashion to those evolving on other continents around 8 Ma, which brought about less productive and markedly (Methods). The best-fit model shows that rates of ecomorphological seasonal conditions30, brought dramatic changes to the evolutionary 26,31 evolution in African lineages were slow and ameliorated over time context of megafauna communities . After the C4 shift, probosci- (Extended Data Fig. 5), underlining the modest ecological diversity dean communities began to deplete. Our community-level analyses of African lineages before the Neogene. Lineages outside Africa, on depict a sustained decrease of local proboscidean richness over time the other hand, evolved 25 times faster (Extended Data Fig. 5). The (Extended Data Figs. 6 and 7) since decreasing productivity in sea- inception of Eurasian lineages triggered unprecedented radiation in sonal savannah–grassland biomes32 could not sustain multiple com- both diversity and disparity of proboscideans, culminating in the petitively robust proboscidean species with further enhanced DMD establishment and expansion of several new PFTs (Fig. 1c). and greater foraging flexibility8,33,34. For the first time, herbivore guilds dominated by these new PFTs (6, 7 and 8) contained fewer Local and clade-scale patterns. The Neogene expansion outside proboscidean species than those with more ecomorphologically Africa drastically changed the course of proboscidean evolution, disparate proboscidean assemblages (P < 0.001). Through most of both in their global and local diversity and disparity. The sustained the Neogene, extinction was highly biased towards the more archaic emergence of functional novelties translated into niche differen- proboscidean taxa with primitive dentition (Extended Data Fig. 10). tiation in proboscideans, facilitating faunas that accommodated In the late Miocene, extinctions eroded a broader spectrum of the several sympatric proboscidean species23,24. Linear models offer functional space (Fig. 3b). Deinotheres (PFT 2) and trilophodont an insight into trends in local proboscidean diversity and how this (dominant components of PFT 3 and 5) were major relates to the masticatory functional morphology of the constitu- casualties. Interestingly, whereas gomphotheres are characterized ent proboscidean taxa (Methods). Before the PDE, alpha diversity by high volatility (high speciation and extinction rates), deinotheres was relatively low. After the PDE—around 22 Ma and until 8 Ma— showed remarkable ‘living fossil’-like macroevolutionary tenden- African and Eurasian faunas were overall richer in proboscidean cies35,36, being persistently low in diversity and deficient in apomor- species and this richness generally increased over time (Extended phy acquisition (Figs. 1c and 2b). Data Fig. 6). Over this period, community-level diversity was Meanwhile, the expansion of PFT 6, 7 and 8 sustained further significantly correlated with a higher local mean NMDS-1 value net positive diversification. Increased climatic perturbations and (P = 0.004; Extended Data Fig. 7). Proboscideans responsible for ecosystem heterogeneity promoted allopatric speciation and local this signal were the PFT 5 (for example, amebelodonts or ‘shovel selection21,27,28. Given the decline of local diversity, the maintenance tuskers’) and PFT 6 (for example, stegolophodonts) taxa, which of global diversity would have stemmed from enhanced taxonomic underwent evolutionary modifications towards enhanced DMD provinciality between regions (). At the macroevolu- and divergent feeding biomechanics (that is, enlarged functional tionary scale, this shift is more clearly reflected in Eurasian diver- lower incisors in PFT 5 (ref. 25) and foreshortened jaws for greater sification trends (Fig. 1d). Around 7 Ma, sustained extinctions mechanical efficiency of mastication in PFT 6 (ref. 9)). Higher prev- produced a brief decline in Eurasian diversity (Extended Data Fig. 4). alence of these functionally specialized taxa reduced the intensity Eurasian proboscidean diversity managed to recover at around of interspecific competition, allowing herbivore guilds to accom- 5 Ma, as speciation rates underwent a fourfold increase and extinc- modate more proboscidean species. tion stabilized between 6 and 3 Ma (Fig. 1d).

1268 Nature Ecology & Evolution | VOL 5 | September 2021 | 1266–1272 | www.nature.com/natecolevol Nature Ecology & Evolution Articles

a b Effect on speciation Effect on extinction

0.4 0.4

0.2 0.2 NMDS 2 0 NMDS 2 0

3.5 0 2.6 −0.05 −0.2 −0.2 1.7 −0.11 0.8 −0.17 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 −0.1 −0.22 −0.6 −0.4 −0.2 0 0.2 NMDS 1 NMDS 1

Fig. 2 | Effect of ecomorphology on diversification. a,b, Ecomorphology-predicted departure of speciation (a) and extinction (b). These are derived from the correlations of rates with NMDS axes. Based on the NMDS scores of each species, we can plot their expected departure from baseline rates on the NMDS space and the proboscidean phylogeny (Extended Data Figs. 8 and 9). The central vertical bar represents PFT assignment.

Quaternary collapse. With newly established PFTs showing ample a diversification potential, no evidence of a diversity equilibrium being 10.0 First records of H. sapiens approached (a maximal diversity of 33 species was estimated around 5.0 Africa 3.2 Ma) and no signal of evolutionary stagnation, nothing would Eurasia 7 have predicted the abrupt collapse of the clade in Quaternary times . 2.0 America Although the speciation rate in Eurasia remained high, extinction 1.0 aggravated at around 3 Ma, progressively hampering net diversi- Extinction fication, as exemplified by the rapid coming and going of numer- 0.5 ous dwarfed insular species before the late Pleistocene. In Africa, extinction rates suddenly quintupled the background Neogene rates 0.2 around 2.4 Ma (Fig. 2a), a pulse that saw a decline in African ele- b phantid (PFT 8 ) diversity37. These events mark the first phase 0.1 of broadscale global proboscidean demise, which first wiped out the few PFT 5 species in North America and then the last dei- 0 notheres (PFT 2) in Africa. The axe also reached the brevirostrine Ecologically selective extinction Ecologically ubiquitous extinction gomphotheres (PFT 6) and mammutids (PFT 4), removing broader −0.1 Random signal portions of the functional morphospace than ever before (Fig. 3b). Extinction selectivity The decimation of proboscidean communities continued (Extended 10 5 2 1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.05 0.02 0.01 Data Fig. 7). There is a substantial shift towards a higher local mean Time (Ma) NMDS-1 from 2.4 Ma onwards (Extended Data Fig. 7), reflecting a wipeout of ‘mastodont-grade’ taxa in Eurasia and Africa and their c Temperature Magnitude of temperature replacement by PFT 7 and 8 (refs. 8,33,38,39). Yet, the estimated global fluctuation 2.0 Africa proboscidean diversity by the end of this first phase was still around Eurasia 40 1.5 23 species, although a third of these were endemic island dwarfs . America A second phase of proboscidean demise is recovered in Eurasia 1.0 and the Americas, starting approximately 160 and 75 thousand Density 0.5 years ago (ka), respectively (Fig. 1e). These extinction shifts repre- 0 sent a 24- and 16-fold increase in severity with respect to Neogene 0 1 2 3 −1 0 1 2 basal levels in Eurasia and the Americas, respectively (Fig. 3a). The already severely depleted mammutids and gomphotheres (PFT Correlation parameter 4 and 6) completely disappeared. Proboscideans with the most proal shearing-adapted dentitions (PFT 7 and 8)9, which had weathered Fig. 3 | Extinction trends in the last 10 Myr. a, Continental extinction rates the first extinction wave, were also hit hard (Figs. 1c and 3b). through time on log-scaled axes, where the triangles mark the timings The cumulative evidence points to a major role of environmental at which the earlier presence of H. sapiens sensu lato54 was established forcing in the collapse of proboscideans. Extinction severity in Africa on the respective land masses (Africa 315 ka, Eurasia 55 ka and the and Eurasia during the last 10 Myr tracked global temperature trends Americas 30 ka)48–50. b, Extinction selectivity shows whether extinction is according to environment-dependent extinction models14 (Fig. 3c). ecologically restricted (positive values) or hits on broad regions Decrease in average global temperatures41 (measured through stable of the functional space (negative values); the grey band represents oxygen-18 isotopes (δ18O)) and increase in the amplitude of tem- values consistent with a random signal (non-significant P values). perature fluctuations yielded a significant relationship with extinc- c, Posterior distributions of correlation parameters of extinction with tion rates. Our models uncovered continent-wide associations of palaeotemperature trends for each continent; the horizontal bars show the extinction and environmental deterioration but they do not suggest 95th highest probability density.

Nature Ecology & Evolution | VOL 5 | September 2021 | 1266–1272 | www.nature.com/natecolevol 1269 Articles Nature Ecology & Evolution homogeneity in causality across lineages and smaller geographi- traits that synthesize morphologies with a clear role in the interactions of each cal scales. Plummeting productivity and ecological reshuffling42 species with its environment, condensing aspects like breadth of dietary preference and feeding envelope, food processing, energy requirements, home range size, (including enhanced competition with other ungulate that social grouping, sexual selection and locomotion. A total of 17 discretized traits evolved specialist grazing ecomorphs) due to rapid Plio-Pleistocene were defined and analysed: (1) body size; (2) molar structure; (3) number of climatic fluctuations set a tight grip on proboscidean diversity lim- transversal loph(id)s; (4) hypsodonty; (5) horizodonty; (6) presence of acute lophs; its, stemming from a sustained decrease in the capacities of eco- (7) presence of obtuse lophs; (8) occlusal topography; (9) degree of enamel folding; systems to support diverse megaherbivore communities throughout (10) shape; (11) morphology of upper tusks; (12) morphology of lower tusks; 31 (13) mandible shape; (14) symphyseal morphology of mandible; (15) pattern the Plio-Pleistocene . Remarkably, the onset of the second, most of mastication; (16) dental replacement; and (17) foot posture. An extensive acute extinction regime is not recovered in Africa and predates the description of the traits, their sources and their ecological relevance is presented in settlement of Homo sapiens in Eurasia and the Americas (Fig. 3a). the Supplementary Methods. We collected information to score these traits based The final dismantling of proboscidean communities and the down- on direct observations by several of the authors (H.Z., J.L.P., J.S. and M.T.A.), and fall of the clade was likely initiated by the severe Holarctic climatic from the literature. The categories of the 17 functional traits are summarized in the Extended Data Fig. 1. changes from the marine isotope stage (MIS) 6 glaciation (approxi- We gathered comprehensive ecomorphological information for 180 species mately 190 kyr) to the particularly harsh and cool climatic condi- and translated 93% of the observed disparity in a 2D NMDS space (by means tions of the MIS 4 stadial (approximately 74 kyr). Nevertheless, our of a Gower distance matrix; Supplementary Methods). This allowed us to results do not contradict a scenario whereby anthropogenic pres- reduce the potential covariation in some of the traits while making it easier to model ecomorphological evolution in a phylogenetic framework and as part of sure contributed to the further catastrophic decline of proboscide- ecology-dependent models. We also used the Gower distance matrix to compute ans towards the end of the Pleistocene, as indicated by the timing of ecological disparity (measured as the sum of variances) and extinction selectivity the extinction of many of the remaining taxa43,44. Significantly, some over time. Based on the NMDS space, we used k-means to identify eight PFTs. The of the shifts in ecosystem functioning that triggered the decline of detailed procedures are shown in the Supplementary Methods. A reconstruction of proboscideans were already in place before they had an obvious representative species of the eight PFTs is shown in Fig. 1a. impact on diversity trajectories, which highlights the importance Speciation and extinction rates over time. Detailed fossil occurrence datasets of integrating ecomorphological and local-scale approaches when provide the opportunity to estimate speciation and extinction rates through establishing the causes of megafauna declines. time while controlling for sampling biases. We applied Bayesian procedures In summary, the fossil evidence shows that proboscidean evolu- (implemented in the software PyRate v.3.0) that analyse occurrence data to tion was a complex and continuous innovative process that allowed simultaneously estimate preservation rates, origination and extinction ages for each species and speciation and extinction rates through time. Complexity in speciation this group to overcome 60 Myr of severe environmental shifts. The and extinction rate trajectories is modelled by identifying the number of significant high diversification rate estimated for the clade is consistent with rate shifts and their temporal assignment using a reversible jump Markov chain the notion that K strategies should promote speciation by ensur- Monte Carlo (MCMC). Temporal ranges associated with each occurrence data ing the persistence of marginal populations in new environments21. point are treated as dating uncertainties, with higher data uncertainty yielding Increasingly resource-efficient ecomorphological novelties would larger uncertainty around parameter estimates. Occurrence ages were randomly resampled 20 times from the uniform distribution defined by their temporal have complemented such strategies, enhancing species persis- ranges, generating 20 datasets. We ran PyRate independently on these 20 datasets. tence and speciation and in turn propelling ecological innovation. The number of generations of the MCMC chains was tailored to each dataset Proboscideans were far from a case of lineage senescence when their based on exploratory analyses. The MCMC run for the global dataset (including demise started, showing that large branches of the of life may NMDS correlations and a run focused on the last 10 Myr) was run for 10 million vanish long before exhausting their evolutionary potential7,45. generations. The African, Eurasian and American datasets were run for 5, 7 and 5 million generations, respectively. We sampled every 1,000 iterations and discarded the 10% as burn-in. The resulting samples obtained from each resampled dataset Methods were enough to ensure an effective sample size >200 in all key parameters. To Occurrence dataset. We gathered a species-level occurrence dataset for report and visualize parameter estimates, 500 random samples were kept from proboscideans drawn from the literature and online databases. We reviewed the each run, resulting in a total of 10,000 samples from each analysis. Rate shifts were dataset for taxonomic rigour and used the literature to maximize the precision of allowed to take place once every million years (the default setting in PyRate, --min_ spatio-temporal occurrence data. Since occurrences with broad temporal ranges dt 1). We allowed preservation rates to shift between the Eocene and Oligocene fatten diversifcation rates, we excluded occurrences with broad temporal ranges (33.9 Ma), between the Aquitanian and the Burdigalian (20.44 Ma) and then for unless this signifcantly decimated the occurrence available for a given taxon boundaries between these periods: Burdigalian (15.97 Ma); Serravallian (11.63 Ma); (see further details in the Supplementary Methods). Tortonian (7.246 Ma); Messinian (5.333 Ma); (2.58 Ma); Pleistocene/ We retained 1,427 records and 129 species from the New and Old Worlds (0.0117 Ma). This definition of boundaries was aimed at obtaining good database (https://nowdatabase.org/now/database) and 626 records and 33 species posterior estimates of sampling rates and was based on exploratory analyses of from the Paleobiology Database (https://paleobiodb.org). A further 73 occurrences occurrence frequency and comparison between different shift configurations. for 37 species were added based on an assortment of other published studies. Detailed diversification profiles for the last 10 Myr were obtained by limiting Twenty-two of these species were not originally included in New and Old Worlds the PyRate analyses (-edgeShift 10 0) and allowing rate shifts to take place and Paleobiology Databases, resulting in a 12% increment of the total diversity every 10 kyr (-min_dt 0.01), taking advantage of the finer record in the Upper studied. The final dataset included 2,130 occurrences for 185 proboscidean species, Miocene, Pliocene and Quaternary times. The fine timing of extinction shifts with an average temporal precision of 1.06 Myr (median 0.8 Myr; 95% confidence for the last 10 Myr was compared to the earliest records of H. sapiens in each interval 0.002675–3.7 Myr). continent48–50 (Fig. 3a). Importantly, PyRate estimates the extinction times for all the species; thus, our extinction rate profiles are not based on a literal reading of Phylogenetic dataset. We drew extensively from the pre-existing systematic last appearance datum. Our approach is conservative regarding the comparison palaeontological literature to build an informal proboscidean supertree that of the timing of extinction shifts with the first records of H. sapiens since PyRate incorporates current understanding of their phylogenetic relationships but at the places the timing of the last extinction regime closer to the appearance of modern same time acknowledges the uncertainty—both topological and temporal—derived humans than the raw first appearance datum would do. from all the available sources. Finally, we computed diversity curves through time using PyRate-implemented The baseline topology included polytomies where branching relationships functions that combine estimates of sampling rates over time and occurrence between species are uncertain. We combined this topology with the oldest credible distribution, yielding diversity estimates that account for the shifting quality of the occurrence of each species and used a tip-dating procedure46 implemented in palaeontological record through time. MrBayes v.3.2.7a47 to generate a posterior distribution of that are consistent with all the information available to date, while accounting for temporal and Effect of ecology on speciation and extinction. Ecology may exert a very topological uncertainties. From the posterior distribution, 100 trees were retained strong impact on diversification rates (speciation and extinction) producing for further analyses. Further details are provided in the Supplementary Methods. species sorting. To test for a role of ecological function on diversification in the , we drew on the possibility to run the Covar model in PyRate. Under Functional ecology and PFTs. Our aim was to capture the evolutionary patterns this model, diversification trajectories are estimated as described above but each behind the rise and demise of functional diversity of proboscideans over time. To species can depart from the overall baseline trend based on a correlation with a delimit different proboscidean functional ecomorphs, we considered functional continuous variable. In our case, the two axes of our NMDS space were tested for

1270 Nature Ecology & Evolution | VOL 5 | September 2021 | 1266–1272 | www.nature.com/natecolevol Nature Ecology & Evolution Articles such a correlation. The resulting coefficients (Extended Data Fig. 8) were used to Code availability estimate the departure from baseline speciation and extinction for each species PyRate v.3.0 is a Python-based (v.3.) program available at https://github. (Fig. 2 and Extended Data Fig. 9). com/dsilvestro/PyRate. Computation in R used functions in the packages mvMORPH v.1.1.3, phytools v.0.7-70, ape v.5.5 and lme4 v.1.1-23. Input files can Effect of palaeoclimate on extinction. A major question regarding megaherbivore be obtained from Supplementary Data 1 and figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/ declines from the late Miocene onwards is to what extent were species extinctions m9.figshare.14035109). the results of climatic perturbations. To quantitatively test for an association between the decline of proboscideans (that is, extinction rates) and palaeoclimate, Received: 23 February 2021; Accepted: 28 May 2021; we used climate-dependent diversification models14 at the continental level. To avoid correlations stemming from broad Cenozoic trends, we restricted our analysis Published online: 1 July 2021 interval to the last 10 Myr. As a proxy for palaeoclimate, we used the recently published record of δ18O variations in deep sea benthic foraminifera41. We computed References two variables from the δ18O data. We estimated the average δ18O score in 0.1 Myr 1. Surovell, T., Waguespack, N. & Brantingham, P. J. Global archaeological bins as a proxy for temperature (the original data come with points every 20 kyr). evidence for proboscidean overkill. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, We also tested for a role of the severe short-term environmental fluctuations that 6231–6236 (2005). characterized the Plio-Pleistocene. To do so, we estimated the absolute of the first 2. Smith, F. A., Smith, R. E. E., Lyons, S. K. & Payne, J. L. Body size differences of the 20-kyr curve and then averaged these values into 0.1 bins. Both downgrading of over the late Quaternary. Science 360, climate-dependent diversification models were run using the PyRateContinuous. 310–313 (2018). py script in the PyRate software11 for 1,000,000 generations, sampled the Bayesian 3. Faith, J. T., Rowan, J., Du, A. & Barr, W. A. Te uncertain case for search every 1,000 iterations and discarded the first 10% as burn-in. The distribution human-driven extinctions prior to Homo sapiens. Quat. Res. 96, 88–104 (2020). of the correlation parameters for each continent is shown in Fig. 3c. 4. Cuvier, G. Mémoires sur les Espèces d’Éléphants Vivants et Fossiles. Mémoires de l’Institut des Sciences et Arts 2, 1–22 (1800); https://www.biodiversitylibrary. Phylogenetic modelling. We assessed modes of proboscidean ecomorphological org/page/16303001#page/175/mode/1up evolution using phylogenetic modelling. To do so, we applied the information 5. Osborn, H. F. Te ancestral tree of the Proboscidea. Discovery, evolution, yielded from the NMDS axes, which are continuous representations of the migration and extinction over a 50,000,000 year period. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. many functional ecomorphological aspects of proboscideans. Given the USA 21, 404–412 (1935). multidimensional nature of our data, we used multivariate phylogenetic models12, 6. International Union for Conservation of Nature. Te IUCN Red List of which allowed us to jointly model the two dimensions of the NMDS space Treatened Species Version 2021-1 (IUCN, 2021); https://www.iucnredlist.org while accounting for the covariance of the axes and their different associated 7. Maglio, V. J. Origin and evolution of the . Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. evolutionary rates and/or optimal values. 63, 1–149 (1973). We fitted two sets of models. In the first set, the entire clade is modelled 8. Zhang, H., Wang, Y., Janis, C. M., Goodall, R. H. & Purnell, M. A. An together and thus represents rates and trends that are shared across all lineages. examination of feeding ecology in Pleistocene proboscideans from southern This set of models include Brownian motion, early burst and the Ornstein– China (, Stegodon, ), by means of dental microwear Uhlenbeck stationary model, representing unconstrained diffusion, decaying rate texture analysis. Quat. Int. 445, 60–70 (2017). scenario (for example, adaptive radiations, ecomorphological stagnation) and 9. Saegusa, H. and Anancus: keys to understanding dental constrained or limited evolution, respectively. evolution in Elephantidae. Quat. Sci. Rev. 231, 106176 (2020). In a second set of models, we explored the role of on the timing 10. Hempson, G. P., Archibald, S. & Bond, W. J. A continent-wide assessment of and mode of proboscidean functional evolution. In particular, we investigated the the form and intensity of large herbivory in Africa. Science 350, role of the PDE, that is, the dispersal of proboscidean lineages beyond Afro-Arabia 1056–1061 (2015). at around 22 Ma. In this set of models, we partitioned the tree in lineages evolving 11. Silvestro, D., Salamin, N., Antonelli, A. & Meyer, X. Improved estimation of in and outside Africa using functions in the ape v.5.551 and phytools v.0.7-7052 macroevolutionary rates from fossil data using a Bayesian framework. R packages (Supplementary Methods) and fitted different combinations of the Paleobiology 45, 546–570 (2019). models described above to these two partitions. Further procedural details of the 12. Clavel, J., Escarguel, G. & Merceron, G. mvMORPH: an R package for ftting models and specific R functions are provided in the Supplementary Methods. multivariate evolutionary models to morphometric data. Methods Ecol. Evol. All models were run on 100 trees. The best performing model is the EBBM (EB 6, 1311–1319 (2015). model in Africa; BM model outside Africa). Parameter estimates and the fit of the 13. Cantalapiedra, J. L., Hernández Fernández, M., Azanza, B. & Morales, J. models are shown in Extended Data Fig. 5. Congruent phylogenetic and fossil signatures of mammalian diversifcation dynamics driven by Tertiary abiotic change. Evolution 69, 2941–2953 (2015). Trends in community-level proboscidean diversity. We assessed the temporal 14. Silvestro, D., Antonelli, A., Salamin, N. & Quental, T. B. Te role of clade trends of local species richness and the relationship of averaged DMD (mean competition in the diversifcation of North American canids. Proc. Natl Acad. NMDS-1 scores) in local richness using mixed-effects models. We tested for the Sci. USA 112, 8684–8689 (2015). different trends in community richness in four different phases. The African 15. Sepkoski, J. J. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity I. Analysis phase spans proboscidean communities before 22 Ma, an age that marks the of marine orders. Paleobiology 4, 223–251 (1978). establishment of several lineages outside Africa (the PDE). The second phase, 16. Tassy, P. in European Neogene Mammal Chronology (eds Lindsay, E. H. et al.) called the after-PDE phase, spans from 22 to 8 Ma. The C4 expansion phase 237–252 (Plenus Press, 1989). includes communities between 8 and 2.4 Ma, reflecting the new ecological settings 17. van der Made, J. in Elefantentreich: eine Fossilwelt in Europa (ed. Meller, H.) brought about globally by this new type of grassland biome, which have been 340–360 (Landesamt für Denkmalpfege und Archäologie previously hypothesized to have a major impact on megafauna communities31. Sachsen-Anhalt-Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte, 2010). The decline phase spans from 2.4 Ma to the present, reflecting the interval where 18. Saarinen, J. J. et al. Patterns of maximum body size evolution in Cenozoic extinction intensified and drove the clade to its decline in diversity. land mammals: eco-evolutionary processes and abiotic forcing. Proc. Biol. Sci. Models where local species richness was a function of age and where richness 281, 20132049 (2014). was a function of mean NMDS-1 scores (DMD, which was scaled from 0 to 19. Fortelius, M. et al. Evolution of Neogene mammals in Eurasia: environmental 1 to ease interpretations; Extended Data Fig. 7b) were evaluated while taking forcing and biotic interactions. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 42, 579–604 (2014). into account age uncertainty and geography-dependent varying effects, such 20. Marshall, C. R. & Quental, T. B. Te uncertain role of diversity dependence as sampling heterogeneity and taxonomic practices (Supplementary Methods). in species diversifcation and the need to incorporate time-varying carrying Mixed-effects models were run using the function lmer in the R package lme4 capacities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20150217 (2016). v.1.1-23 (ref. 53). Corrected Akaike information criterion (AIC) scores show that 21. Vrba, E. S. Evolution, species and : how does life evolve? S. Afr. J. Sci. the different phases have an effect both on the slope and the intercepts of the 76, 61–84 (1980). relationships, both for age and DMD models. (AICc weights are 1 in both cases, 22. Cantalapiedra, J. L., Prado, J. L., Hernández Fernández, M. & Alberdi, M. T. suggesting a strong preference for the most complex models.) The parameters Decoupled ecomorphological evolution and diversifcation in of the best models for each variable are provided in Extended Data Fig. 6. A Neogene-Quaternary horses. Science 355, 627–630 (2017). representation of the best models is shown in Extended Data Fig. 7. 23. Calandra, I., Göhlich, U. B. & Merceron, G. How could sympatric megaherbivores coexist? Example of niche partitioning within a Reporting Summary. Further information on research design is available in the proboscidean community from the Miocene of Europe. Naturwissenschafen Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article. 95, 831–838 (2008). 24. Sanders, W. J. Proboscidea from Kanapoi, Kenya. J. Hum. Evol. 140, Data availability 102547 (2020). Datasets are available in Supplementary Data 1 and from figshare (https://doi. 25. Wang, S. et al. Evolution of Protanancus (Proboscidea, Mammalia) in East org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14035109). Asia. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 35, e881830 (2015).

Nature Ecology & Evolution | VOL 5 | September 2021 | 1266–1272 | www.nature.com/natecolevol 1271 Articles Nature Ecology & Evolution

26. Lister, A. M. Te role of behaviour in adaptive morphological evolution of 47. Ronquist, F. et al. MrBayes 3.2: Efcient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and African proboscideans. Nature 500, 331–334 (2013). model choice across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012). 27. Lister, A. M., Sher, A. V., van Essen, H. & Wei, G. Te pattern and process of 48. Hublin, J.-J. et al. New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and the evolution in Eurasia. Quat. Int. 126, 49–64 (2005). pan-African origin of Homo sapiens. Nature 546, 289–292 (2017). 28. Wei, G. et al. New materials of the steppe mammoth, Mammuthus 49. O’Connell, J. F. et al. When did Homo sapiens frst reach Southeast Asia and trogontherii, with discussion on the origin and evolutionary patterns of Sahul? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8482–8490 (2018). . Sci. China Earth Sci. 53, 956–963 (2010). 50. Ardelean, C. F. et al. Evidence of human occupation in Mexico around the 29. Stanley, S. M. Macroevolution: Patterns and Processes (W. H. Freeman and Last Glacial Maximum. Nature 584, 87–92 (2020). Company, 1979). 51. Paradis, E. Analysis of Phylogenetics and Evolution with R (Springer, 2012).

30. Edwards, E. J. et al. Te origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and 52. Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and ecosystem science. Science 328, 587–591 (2010). other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012). 31. Faith, J. T., Rowan, J., Du, A. & Koch, P. L. Plio-Pleistocene decline of African 53. Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-efects megaherbivores: no evidence for ancient hominin impacts. Science 362, models using lme4. J. Stat. Sofw. 67, 1–48 (2015). 938–941 (2018). 54. MacLatchy, L. M., Desilva, J., Sanders, W. J. & Wood, B. in Cenozoic 32. Kaya, F. et al. Te rise and fall of the Old World savannah fauna and the Mammals of Africa (eds Werdelin, L. & Sanders, W. J.) 471–545 (Univ. origins of the African savannah biome. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 241–246 (2018). California Press, 2010). 33. Saarinen, J. & Lister, A. M. Dental mesowear refects local vegetation and niche separation in Pleistocene proboscideans from Britain. J. Quat. Sci. 31, Acknowledgements 799–808 (2016). We thank D. Silvestro, J. Calatayud and J. Clavel for technical assistance and F. Bibi, M. J. 34. Rivals, F., Semprebon, G. M. & Lister, A. M. Feeding traits and dietary Benton and W. J. Sanders for helpful comments. S. Wang and G. van den Bergh variation in Pleistocene proboscideans: a microwear review. Quat. Sci. provided important constructive comments on the informal supertree. We also Rev. 219, 145–153 (2019). thank E. M. Dunne, D. Mothé and F. Rivals, whose comments and recommendations 35. Vrba, E. S. in Living Fossils (eds Eldredge, N. & Stanley, S. M.) 62–79 improved the presentation of this paper. This work was supported by the Talent (Springer, 1984). Attraction Program of the Madrid Government (no. 2017-T1/AMB5298), the German 36. Herrera‐Flores, J. A., Stubbs, T. L. & Benton, M. J. Macroevolutionary Research Foundation (AOBJ no. 637491) and the Academy of Finland (post-doctoral patterns in Rhynchocephalia: is the (Sphenodon punctatus) a living research fund no. 315691). fossil? Palaeontology 60, 319–328 (2017). 37. Todd, N. E. Trends in proboscidean diversity in the African Cenozoic. J. Mamm. Evol. 13, 1–10 (2006). Author contributions 38. Rivals, F., Mol, D., Lacombat, F., Lister, A. M. & Semprebon, G. M. Resource J.L.C., O.S. and J.S. conceptualized the research. J.L.C., O.S., J.S., H.Z., M.T.A. and J.L.P. partitioning and niche separation between mammoths (Mammuthus rumanus gathered the data. J.L.C., O.S. and F.B. designed and performed the analysis. J.S. wrote the and ) and gomphotheres (Anancus arvernensis) in description and relevance of functional traits. J.L.C. and O.S. wrote the first version of the the Early Pleistocene of Europe. Quat. Int. 379, 164–170 (2015). paper. H.Z. and J.S. contributed to the final version (main text and supplement). 39. Sanders, W. J. & Haile-Selassie, Y. A new assemblage of mid-Pliocene proboscideans from the Woranso-Mille area, Afar region, Ethiopia: Competing interests taxonomic, evolutionary, and paleoecological considerations. J. Mamm. Evol. The authors declare no competing interests. 19, 105–128 (2012). 40. van der Geer, A. A. E. et al. Te efect of area and isolation on insular dwarf proboscideans. J. Biogeogr. 43, 1656–1666 (2016). Additional information 41. Westerhold, T. et al. An astronomically dated record of Earth’s climate and its Extended data is available for this paper at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01498-w. predictability over the last 66 million years. Science 369, 1383–1387 (2020). Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material 42. Vrba, E. S. in African Biogeography, Climate Change, and Hominid Evolution available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01498-w. (eds Bromage, T. G. & Shrenk, F.) 19–39 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1999). 43. Stuart, A. J. Late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions on the continents: a Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.L.C. short review. Geol. J. 50, 338–363 (2015). Peer review information Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Emma Dunne, Pasquale 44. Jukar, A. M., Lyons, S. K., Wagner, P. J. & Uhen, M. D. Late Quaternary Raia, Dimila Mothé, Florent Rivals and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their extinctions in the Indian subcontinent. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. Palaeoecol. 562, 110137 (2021). Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. 45. Raup, D. M. Extinction: Bad Genes or Bad Luck? (Norton, 1991). 46. Cantalapiedra, J. L. et al. Conserving evolutionary history does not Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in result in greater diversity over geological time scales. Proc. Biol. Sci. 286, published maps and institutional affiliations. 20182896 (2019). © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021

1272 Nature Ecology & Evolution | VOL 5 | September 2021 | 1266–1272 | www.nature.com/natecolevol Nature Ecology & Evolution Articles

Extended Data Fig. 1 | Description of the 17 ecomorphological traits. Further details regarding traits scoring can be found in the Supplementary Methods.

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol Articles Nature Ecology & Evolution

Extended Data Fig. 2 | Phylo-functional space of proboscideans. Species coloured according to taxonomic affinities (a) and proboscidean functional type (b). Correlations of the different ecomorphological features with the functional space (c). Correlations of ordered variables (for example body size) are shown in one plot, whereas unordered variables have been broken down into binary traits prior to each correlation analysis.

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol Nature Ecology & Evolution Articles

Extended Data Fig. 3 | Phenograms of NMDS axes 1 and 2. PFTs reconstructed on the tree using a stochastic mapping as implemented in the make. simmap function in the R library phytools52.

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol Articles Nature Ecology & Evolution

Extended Data Fig. 4 | Global and continental proboscidean diversity through time as estimated using PyRate. Shaded areas represent 95% credible intervals. Diversity axis is log-scaled.

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol Nature Ecology & Evolution Articles

Extended Data Fig. 5 | Results from macroevolutionary phylogenetic models. Support is indicated by AICc scores (smaller is better) and AICc Weights (higher is better). Average parameter estimates were obtained from 100 trees. Evolutionary rates are colour-coded for comparison (reddish being faster rates).

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol Articles Nature Ecology & Evolution

Extended Data Fig. 6 | Parameter estimates of the community-level general linear mixed-effects models. Mean, upper and lower confidence limits are provided for intercepts and slopes.

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol Nature Ecology & Evolution Articles

Extended Data Fig. 7 | Representation of the mixed-effects models. Relationship of local species richness with age (a), and averaged DMD (b) across different phases. Density plots show the distribution of average DMD scores in each phase. A schematic comparison of slopes and intercepts is included, showing whether parameters estimates are significantly larger (>), significantly smaller (<), or not significantly different (≈).

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol Articles Nature Ecology & Evolution

Extended Data Fig. 8 | Effect of ecology (NMDS scores in axis 1 and 2) on speciation (�λ, blue) and extinction (��, red). Posterior estimates of the correlation parameters. Horizontal lines beneath the histograms represent 95% credible intervals, which in all cases are significantly different from 0. NMDS-1 is associated with differential speciation potencial, whereas NMDS-2 is associated with differential extinction.

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol Nature Ecology & Evolution Articles

Extended Data Fig. 9 | Aggregated effect of ecology on speciation (blue), and extinction (red). The effect of specific species ecology as the departure from baseline rates plotted over time (a,b) and on the tree (c,d). Phylogenetic reconstructions were conducted with the contMap function in the R library phytools52.

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol Articles Nature Ecology & Evolution

Extended Data Fig. 10 | Extinction selectivity through time. Differences in mean pairwise disparity between random extinctions and observed extinctions across the entire proboscidean history (a), and the last 10 Myr (b). Positive values represent ecologically-restricted extinction; negative values result when extinction hits on broad regions of the functional space; the grey points show values consistent with a random signal (non-significant P-values).

Nature Ecology & Evolution | www.nature.com/natecolevol nature research | reporting summary

Corresponding author(s): Juan L. Cantalapiedra

Last updated by author(s): May 17, 2021

Reporting Summary Nature Research wishes to improve the reproducibility of the work that we publish. This form provides structure for consistency and transparency in reporting. For further information on Nature Research policies, see our Editorial Policies and the Editorial Policy Checklist.

Statistics For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or Methods section. n/a Confirmed The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as a discrete number and unit of measurement A statement on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one- or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section. A description of all covariates tested A description of any assumptions or corrections, such as tests of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g. means) or other basic estimates (e.g. regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or associated estimates of uncertainty (e.g. confidence intervals)

For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g. F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.

For Bayesian analysis, information on the choice of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of outcomes Estimates of effect sizes (e.g. Cohen's d, Pearson's r), indicating how they were calculated

Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code Policy information about availability of computer code Data collection NA

Data analysis PyRate is a Python v.3. based program available at https://github.com/dsilvestro/PyRate. Computation in R used functions in packages mvMORPH, phytools, ape and lme4. For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or software that are central to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be made available to editors and reviewers. We strongly encourage code deposition in a community repository (e.g. GitHub). See the Nature Research guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.

Data Policy information about availability of data All manuscripts must include a data availability statement. This statement should provide the following information, where applicable: - Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets - A list of figures that have associated raw data April 2020 - A description of any restrictions on data availability

Datasets are available in the Extended Data file 1 and FigShare (doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14035109).

1 nature research | reporting summary Field-specific reporting Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research. If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection. Life sciences Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences study design All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative. Study description We analyse diversification patterns and the mode of ecomorphological evolution using a bayesian procedure based on occurrence data and phylogenetic modeling.

Research sample We study the macroevolutionary patterns of the Proboscidea (Mammalia).

Sampling strategy Regarding the occurrence dataset, we maximized temporal precision over number of occurrences.

Data collection Occurrence data was originally downloaded from NOW and PBDB by JLC. An extensive revision of the occurrence dataset, including taxonomical consistency, improvement of occurrence temporal/stratigraphic information, and the addition of new occurrences was carried out by JS, HZ, OS, MTA, JLP, and JLC. The compilation of the 17 ecomorphological traits was conducted by JS, OS, HZ and JLC.

Timing and spatial scale NA

Data exclusions Occurrence data assigned to broad tempral ranges were excluded to avoid flattening of PyRate-derived rates through time estimates.

Reproducibility All the data and codes used in this paper are available from Extended Data file 1, FigShare (doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.14035109), PyRate website and R repositories.

Randomization NA

Blinding NA Did the study involve field work? Yes No

Reporting for specific materials, systems and methods We require information from authors about some types of materials, experimental systems and methods used in many studies. Here, indicate whether each material, system or method listed is relevant to your study. If you are not sure if a list item applies to your research, read the appropriate section before selecting a response. Materials & experimental systems Methods n/a Involved in the study n/a Involved in the study Antibodies ChIP-seq Eukaryotic cell lines Flow cytometry Palaeontology and archaeology MRI-based neuroimaging and other organisms Human research participants Clinical data Dual use research of concern April 2020

2