134 Sykehouse Show
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
?S\ Environment Agency We Are the Environment Agency
---------- ?s\ Environment Agency We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look afteryour environment and make itE liH ia X iB ffl- foryou, and for future generation ■ Your environme water you drink and the ground Information Services Unit usiness, Government an Please return or renew this item by the due date makingyour environment cle Due Date The Environmen your environment a better place. Published by: Environment Agency Rivers House 21 Park Square South Leeds LSI 2QG Tel: 08708 506 506 Email: [email protected] www.environment-agency.gov.uk © Environment Agency All rights reserved. This document mav be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. _ The River Don rises on Dunford Moor in the Pennines and flows to Penistone before turning south-east to Sheffield. From Sheffield it flows north-east to join the tidal Ouse at Goole. It has two tributaries, the Rother and Dearne. The Rother rises near Clay Cross in Derbyshire and joins the Don in Rotherham. The Dearne starts its life west of Denby Dale and flows through Barnsley and Mexborough, where it too meets the Don. The Don, Rother and Dearne catchment All three rivers pass through thriving, healthy rivers often Rother and the Dearne. But dramatically different scenes, from became dumping grounds for thankfully the story does not end beautiful, unspoilt countryside to sewage and industry’s waste. there and the past 20 years have seen a slow turnaround in the heavily populated and With the exception of a few trout rivers’ fortunes. industrialised towns and cities. and bullhead in the headwaters The rapid growth in industry and above Penistone, the Don - once a the associated growth in great salmon river - became population was the downfall of completely lifeless as did the many northern rivers and these three were no exception. -
Parish Profile Stainforth with Fishlake, Skyehouse, Kirk Bramwith with Fenwick and Moss (Flowing Waters Mission Area)
PARISH PROFILE STAINFORTH WITH FISHLAKE, SKYEHOUSE, KIRK BRAMWITH WITH FENWICK AND MOSS (FLOWING WATERS MISSION AREA) CHURCH OF ENGLAND DIOCESE OF SHEFFIELD 2020 Contents Page Number Bishops’ Statement 1 The Opportunity (Introduction) 2 Stainforth Group of Churches Stainforth 4 Fishlake 5 Kirk Bramwith with Fenwick and Moss 10 Sykehouse 11 The Other Churches in the Mission Area Hatfield and Dunscroft 14 Thorne 17 The Vicarage 20 Additional Demographics (Maps and Statistics) 21 2 Bishops’ Statement for Parish Profiles (Stainforth Group of Churches) Dear friend, There is no denying it: these are challenging times in the Diocese of Sheffield. But by the same token, these are exciting times for us. No-one has any doubt that in 2029 the Church of England in South Yorkshire and the East Riding will look very different from the way it is now — but equally no- one is yet very clear about the shape it will take. Our plan is an ambitious one and we are hungry for change. We are asking tough questions. Will the whole people of God be mobilised for the whole mission of God? What will morale be like, among key lay and ordained leaders? Will attendance figures be in decline or growing? Will there be more stipendiary incumbents or fewer? Will there be more congregations or fewer? Will we raise up a dynamic community of ‘Lights for Christ’? Will we grow a praying community of 2025 by 2025? These questions were already pressing ones for us before the present pandemic: they will surely be even more urgent for us now. -
Redh DONCASTER INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY
Redh DONCASTER INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGY MEETING OUR LONG TERM INVESTMENT NEEDS ANNEX MARCH 2019 1 INTRODUCTION This report is the annex to the Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy main report. It amends the 2015 report with updated baseline data and scheme information. All data is a correct as at spring 2019. The Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy consists of the following sections. A main report setting out the key infrastructure needs facing the borough and how they will be addressed. An annex containing a more detailed description of the key infrastructure proposals and projects. A short summary of main findings and recommendations of the report. The main report includes a schedule of the key infrastructure projects that are required or are desirable to support Doncaster’s growth. This annex covers the following themes. 1. Transportation (strategic highways, rail transport, cycling and bus transport). 2. Education and learning (primary, secondary and further education). 3. Green infrastructure (greenspaces, green routes and biodiversity). 4. Health and social care. 5. Flooding and drainage infrastructure. 6. Community, sport and cultural facilities. 7. Energy and telecommunications. 8. Utilities (gas, electricity and waste water). This annex also highlights gaps in provision (in the absence of funding or committed projects) and looks at how these can be addressed. Copies of these documents are available from our website at www.doncaster.gov.uk/localplan. The information is accurate as of Spring 2019. The Doncaster Infrastructure Strategy will be updated as new information becomes available and infrastructure proposals are confirmed in more detail. 2 CHAPTER 1: TRANSPORTATION 1.1. Strategic transport infrastructure plays a key role in supporting the economic growth of the Borough and the wider Sheffield City Region. -
South Yorkshire
INDUSTRIAL HISTORY of SOUTH RKSHI E Association for Industrial Archaeology CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 6 STEEL 26 10 TEXTILE 2 FARMING, FOOD AND The cementation process 26 Wool 53 DRINK, WOODLANDS Crucible steel 27 Cotton 54 Land drainage 4 Wire 29 Linen weaving 54 Farm Engine houses 4 The 19thC steel revolution 31 Artificial fibres 55 Corn milling 5 Alloy steels 32 Clothing 55 Water Corn Mills 5 Forging and rolling 33 11 OTHER MANUFACTUR- Windmills 6 Magnets 34 ING INDUSTRIES Steam corn mills 6 Don Valley & Sheffield maps 35 Chemicals 56 Other foods 6 South Yorkshire map 36-7 Upholstery 57 Maltings 7 7 ENGINEERING AND Tanning 57 Breweries 7 VEHICLES 38 Paper 57 Snuff 8 Engineering 38 Printing 58 Woodlands and timber 8 Ships and boats 40 12 GAS, ELECTRICITY, 3 COAL 9 Railway vehicles 40 SEWERAGE Coal settlements 14 Road vehicles 41 Gas 59 4 OTHER MINERALS AND 8 CUTLERY AND Electricity 59 MINERAL PRODUCTS 15 SILVERWARE 42 Water 60 Lime 15 Cutlery 42 Sewerage 61 Ruddle 16 Hand forges 42 13 TRANSPORT Bricks 16 Water power 43 Roads 62 Fireclay 16 Workshops 44 Canals 64 Pottery 17 Silverware 45 Tramroads 65 Glass 17 Other products 48 Railways 66 5 IRON 19 Handles and scales 48 Town Trams 68 Iron mining 19 9 EDGE TOOLS Other road transport 68 Foundries 22 Agricultural tools 49 14 MUSEUMS 69 Wrought iron and water power 23 Other Edge Tools and Files 50 Index 70 Further reading 71 USING THIS BOOK South Yorkshire has a long history of industry including water power, iron, steel, engineering, coal, textiles, and glass. -
~ 21 ~ 2. History of Peat Exploitation
Peat exploitation on Thorne Moors. A case- study from the Yorkshire-Lincolnshire border 1626-1963, with integrated notes on Hatfield Moors Item Type Thesis Authors Limbert, Martin Rights <a rel="license" href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/3.0/"><img alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0" src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by- nc-nd/3.0/88x31.png" /></a><br />The University of Bradford theses are licenced under a <a rel="license" href="http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Licence</a>. Download date 29/09/2021 22:07:19 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/5454 2. HISTORY OF PEAT EXPLOITATION 2.1 Unrefined peat fuel from Thorne Waste In 1626, during the reign of Charles I, an agreement was drawn up between the Crown and a Dutch entrepreneur Cornelius Vermyuden, to undertake the drainage of Hatfield Chase. The chase and its purlieus stretched from the River Aire in the north to Bawtry and north Nottinghamshire in the south, and from near Doncaster in the west to the rivers Don, Torne and Idle which form the boundary with Lincolnshire. The Isle of Axholme lies to the east, extending as far as the River Trent. The main causes of flooding were the meandering, sluggish courses of the Rivers Don, Torne and Idle, which could not cope with heavy rains in their western catchments. In addition, the River Trent, the main outlet for the three rivers, and the Don itself, were strongly tidal. To the north lay the tidal rivers Ouse and Aire and the smaller River Went. -
Doncaster Cycling Map
6 A 6 N V T O 4 W 3 E B Bentley Moor E A R N H 2 E 8 L O Wood N R M E 2 C TH OA R D A OR D M N L IN W E I D E V S A N P L I V E BO E L EADO F T N IV O A M W IE S U R R N F H E E D T E H F V E L U R BE T E AR I Dunscroft M A R S L O UM EN O LO M L W V N O W C PA A NT A UTTERW R E RK G O L E N Y ORT T R W E Barnby Dun O R AV H UT U S Adwick D U D O A T EN L B Y R B U R AD A E M E WIC S IV A E K LA Common V T E C T NE E F N T A 9 H E U H V C PO 1 E S E A H N E C E R A AVE D I GTON I K T ENNIN R YN IN O K C L N U GSLE A I Y V Adwick Pk E T R E E B V L O N N D A A A A U LA Jun Sch A W D O C E K E L R K Barnby Dun Frickley OOD N E A R U V B E L W A A R T A E N E E S R E V T N A S N N A Common H V E R E C E H A Park Hill N U T A N F T A B D Playing Fields O SB U IN W D U E Almholme Hooton R Y SW Outwood IC A Grange AVENUE ADWICK K R 49 50 51 52 53 W54 55 56 57 Shaftholme 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 L M Town and country maps with hundreds of miles of routes E A A N Academy S N E T E N Grumble Hurst H Pagnell R H LA O I A O G N L R B LE STREET L M R G I OO P L S O T V O North Ridge L O E S O L R L E CLAYT U LAN V N A NE AN L ON L ALK H LA E E A ANE N GE B Community E R TPT SHAFT ME G PO ID E N HOL H C N R D R C D N O Q C E A E L E E A E Lound Hill L L X R S U E N A School T O S U K R RT E N 'S O D N L O T N M D G E A N O E A A S E B N ECT R V R Plantation R E O O N V S L V R ND U O O U L O R O A R A I I Toll Bar R E T A N L A V R O D ENT N M L R T A ESC D Almholme Field I E I G E A V R E D A EW E E O E C N V V T D IV E D I V I T G N S E E R R Prim Sch -
Joint Defra/EA Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management R&D
Joint Defra/EA Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management R&D Programme Annex A: Preliminary guidance on the use of benefits transfer for riverine recreation and angling and coastal recreation R&D Project Record FD2013/PR2 Produced: November 2004 Statement of use This report provides guidance on the use of MCA and ASTs to assist in the appraisal of flood and coastal erosion risk management projects, strategies and policies. It should be noted that it does not constitute official government policy or guidance, which is unlikely to be available until work to develop the methodology and identify appropriate sources of data has been undertaken through pilot studies. This report may be downloaded from the Defra/EA R&D Programme website (http://www.defra.gov.uk/environ.fcd/research), use the search tool located on the project information and publications page. Copies are held by all EA Regional Information Centres, contact The Environment Agency’s National Customer Contact Centre by emailing [email protected] or by telephoning 08708506506. Dissemination Status Internal: Released internally External: Released to public domain Keywords: Multi criteria analysis, MCA, appraisal summary table, AST, decision rule Research contractor contact details: Lead contractor: Risk & Policy Analysts Ltd (RPA), Farthing Green House, 1 Beccles Road, Loddon, Norfolk, NR14 6LT (Tel: 01508 528465; Fax: 01508 520758; www.rpaltd.co.uk). The project director was Meg Postle, the project manager for RPA was John Ash with research support from Susana Dias and other members of RPA staff. The research team also included: Colin Green (Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University); Alan Pearman (University of Leeds); Ron Janssen (The Institute of Environmental Studies, Free University, Amsterdam), Terry Oakes and Hugh Payne (Independent Consultants) Acknowledgements The assistance of those providing information for the case studies is gratefully acknowledged. -
The Sykes Family North Aston
The Sykes family of North Aston 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................ 3 e Sykes name – some history ...................................................... 7 e village of North Aston ...........................................................11 e Sykes family of North Aston ..................................................15 Les Sykes’ reminiscences of North Aston ......................................35 Acknowledgments .......................................................................47 1 North Aston and surroundings INTRODUCTION My name is John Sykes. at was not my name at birth. My mother was 18 years old at the time and unmarried. My father disappeared before I was born. So I took my mother’s surname, which was Schiller. My birth cer- tificate shows that I was born John Schiller on 6 August 1934 in Reading, Berkshire. My mother had no means to raise me, so when I was two weeks old I was handed over to the social welfare service in Reading. ey placed me in the homes of foster-parents. Initial arrangements were unsatisfactory. But when I was about 6 months old I was placed under the responsibility of a Mrs. Bessie May Sykes, and I remained with Mrs. Sykes until I flew from the nest at the age of 18. Mrs. Sykes had separated several years earlier from her husband Bernard Sykes so I had no fos- ter-father. She had lived with him for some 20 years in the village of North Aston, Oxfordshire. From such inauspicious beginnings Mrs. Sykes nurtured and supported me very well, for I received a good education and became a man of the world. I left England in 1959 at the age of 25, and have lived in various countries over the years. I am in my early eighties as I write this monograph. -
To the Down of The
900 YEARS OF THE DON FISHERY fc n v ir o n m e to the down of the E n v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y The hand of man and the neglect of our . \i ancestors have deprived us of | a river which must have been a vision of glittering beauty (■ ERNEST PHILLIPS 1921 '1 The Don was once one of the country's finest salmon rivers. They have been absent from Salmon Pastures in Sheffield for more than two centuries. In fact for much of that time the river has been virtually fishless. Chris Firth's fascinating history of the river is timely. We now have a thriving coarse fishery again and the first salmon was found in Doncaster on 31 December 1995. Chris's study shows how man's exploitation of the Don devastated its ecology long before the pollution of the industrial revolution. Much has been achieved in recent years but much more remains to be done to protect and sustain the river. Os- JOHN FAWCETT CHAIRMAN 1 983 - 1 997 YORKSHIRE REGIONAL FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Born and raised in the Don catchment, I have witnessed the river's misery throughout my childhood and into adult life. When in my professional life, the opportunity presented itself to begin the restoration of the Don I was eager to be involved. That is not to say that this document has been easy to produce. The collation of information from many varying sources has proved to be extremely challenging. The final product of many months of hard work is not a scientific record but a reflection borne of personal and professional experience. -
Doncaster Green Belt Review Stage 3 Green Belt Sites Re- Appraisal
Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Doncaster Green Belt Review Stage 3 Green Belt Sites Re- appraisal ISSUE Issue | 9 May 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 245498-00245498-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd Admiral House Rose Wharf 78 East Street Leeds LS9 8EE United Kingdom www.arup.com Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council Doncaster Green Belt Review Stage 3 Green Belt Sites Re-appraisal Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Background 2 1.3 Summary of the Method to Assessing the Green Belt in Doncaster 3 1.4 Relationship with Local Plan-making 4 1.5 Structure of this Report 4 2 Policy Guidance and Context 5 2.1 Overview 5 2.2 National Planning Context 5 2.3 Local Planning Context 9 3 Approach to Green Belt Site Re-appraisal 15 3.1 Overview 15 3.2 Starting Point for Assessment 15 3.3 Proposed Methodology for Assessment 15 3.4 Assumptions 21 4 Summarising the Stage 3 Green Belt Sites Re-appraisal 23 4.1 Overview 23 4.2 Grading 23 5 Conclusion 25 5.1 Overview 25 5.2 Summary of Assessment Outcomes 25 5.3 Aligning Outputs from the Stage 3 Re-appraisal with Progression of Sites through the Local Plan 27 5.4 Next Steps 27 ISSUE | Issue | 9 May 2017 J:\240000\245498-00\0 ARUP\0-09 PLANNING\0-09-08 REPORTS\10. -
Domesdayto the Dawn of the New Millennium the Hand of Man and the Neglect of Our
900 YEARS OF THE DON FISHERY domesdayto the dawn of the new millennium The hand of man and the neglect of our ancestors have deprived us of a river which must have been a vision of glittering beauty ERNEST PHILLIPS 1921 The Don was once one of the country’s finest salmon rivers. They have been absent from Salmon Pastures in Sheffield for more than two centuries. In fact for much of that time the river has been virtually fishless. Chris Firth’s fascinating history of the river is timely. We now have a thriving coarse fishery again and the first salmon was found in Doncaster on 31 December 1995. Chris’s study shows how man’s exploitation of the Don devastated its ecology long before the pollution of the industrial revolution. Much has been achieved in recent years but much more remains to be done to protect and sustain the river. JOHN FAWCETT CHAIRMAN 1983 - 1997 YORKSHIRE REGIONAL FISHERIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Born and raised in the Don catchment, I have witnessed the river's misery throughout my childhood and into adult life. When in my professional life, the opportunity presented itself to begin the restoration of the Don I was eager to be involved. That is not to say that this document has been easy to produce. The collation of information from many varying sources has proved to be extremely challenging. The final product of many months of hard work is not a scientific record but a reflection borne of personal and professional experience. As such the views it includes may not universally reflect the opinions of fellow professionals, it is however an account of the destructive demands that man's activities have imposed upon the Don system. -
Researching Yorkshire Quaker History
Researching Yorkshire Quaker history A guide to sources Compiled by Helen E Roberts for the Yorkshire Quaker Heritage Project Published by The University of Hull Brynmor Jones Library 2003 (updated 2007) 1 The University of Hull 2003 Published by The University of Hull Brynmor Jones Library ISBN 0-9544497-0-3 Acknowledgements During the lifetime of this project, numerous people have contributed their time, enthusiasm and knowledge of Quaker history; I would like to thank those who volunteered to undertake name indexing of Quaker records, those who participated in the project conferences and those who offered information to the project survey. In particular I am grateful for the continued support and encouragement of Brian Dyson, Hull University Archivist, and Oliver Pickering, Deputy Head of Special Collections, Leeds University Library, as well as the other members of the project steering group. Thanks are due to the staff of the following archive offices and libraries whose collections are covered in this guide: Cumbria Record Office, Kendal, Doncaster Archives Department, Durham County Record Office, East Riding Archives and Records Service, Huddersfield University Library, Lancashire Record Office, Leeds University Library Department of Special Collections, the Library of the Religious Society of Friends, Sheffield Archives, West Yorkshire Archive Service, York City Archives and the Borthwick Institute of Historical Research, University of York, and to the archivists at Bootham School and The Mount School, York, and Ackworth School. The support of the Friends Historical Society, the Quaker Family History Society and the Quaker Studies Research Association is also acknowledged. The project received valuable assistance from the Historical Manuscripts Commission, through the good offices of Andrew Rowley.