DOCSLIB.ORG

TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G. Lees, County Executive Officer PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The "Lockyer-Isenberg Trial Court Funding Act of 1997" (AB233), Chapter 850, became effective on January 1, 1998. The legislation finds and declares that the judiciary of California is a separate and independent branch of government, recognized by the Constitution and statutes of the State. The Legislature has previously established the principle that the funding of trial court operations California Rules of Court (CRC 810) is most logically a function of the state. Such funding is necessary to provide uniform standards and procedures, economies of scale, and structural efficiency and simplification. This decision also reflects the fact that the overwhelming business of the trial courts is to interpret and enforce provisions of state law and to resolve disputes among the people of the State of California. The County transferred responsibility for five court facilities to the Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), on December 17, 2008. The County is the managing party in three facilities: Burney Joint Use Building, Justice Center, and Juvenile Hall. The AOC is the managing party in the Main Courthouse and Courthouse Annex. A Joint Occupancy Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the County and the AOC memorialize the party's roles and responsibilities. The County is obligated to pay the AOC an annual County Facility Payment (currently $457,370), to offset the Court's historical expense for operations and maintenance of the court facilities. The expenses remaining in this budget unit are considered County costs under the rules of "trial court funding." This includes court facilities, maintenance of effort (MOE) responsibilities, debt payment on courthouse renovation and justice center construction, and the costs associated with the collection division. They also include the County Facility Payment (CFP) and revenues received from the AOC for the Court's share of operations and maintenance in the facilities managed by the County. Starting in FY 2010-11, this budget also includes costs to relocate staff from the Public Safety Building. Other Revenue consists of fines, fees, and forfeitures collected pursuant to various legislative codes and retained by the County. BUDGET REQUESTS The costs remaining in the County's Court budget are for non-CRC 810 costs. This includes court facilities, the maintenance of effort (MOE) allocation, debt payments on the Justice Center facility and the Courthouse renovation project, inmate transportation, and all costs associated with the collection division. In December 2008 the County transferred responsibility for 5 court facilities to the Administrative Office of the Courts. The County Facility Payment (CFP) is $457,370. Total requested appropriations for FY 2014- 15 are $3.5 million. Revenues remain flat, a symptom of the economic downturn which affects the public's ability to pay court fines and fees. Requested revenues are $2.8 million. The State selected property for its new Redding Courthouse on Court Street across from the existing Main Courthouse. The County negotiated the sale of the Public Safety Building and adjacent parking lots to the AOC. Included for a third year is an appropriation ($1 million) for costs associated with relocating the Sheriff and Probation departments before December 31,2015. The Net County Cost for this budget unit is essentially status quo at $638,406. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS The CEO recommended budget is as requested by the department head, with adjustments to facilities Shasta County Recommended Budget, FY 2014-15 ....................................................................................................... 1OJ operation and maintenance line items due to the AOC's estimate for the Main Courthouse and Courthouse Annex. PENDING ISSUES AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS The AOC's timeline to commence construction of the New Redding Courthouse has been delayed until at least 2015-16. The County's holding over in the Public Safety Building was extended to December 31, 2015. Future budgets will be impacted by the need to provide alternative office space for both Probation and Sheriff staff and operations during the construction of the new courthouse and the remodel of the existing courthouse. DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE OR APPEAL This budget was prepared by the County Administrative Office. 104 ....................................................................................................... Shasta County Recommended Budget, FY 2014-15 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUDGET UNIT FINANCING DETAIL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 ACTUAL ADJUSTED ESTIMATED BUDGET BUDGET DIFFERENCE STATE CONTROLLER E:XP/REV BUDGET EXP/REV REQUESTS RECOMMENDED REC 11-15 COUNTY BUDGET ~CT {1985) 2012-13 2013-14 2013-14 2014-15 2014-15 RQST 14-15 UNIT TITLE: 201 TRIAL COURTS FUNCTION: PUBLIC PROTECTION ACTIVITY: JUDICIAL FUND:0060 GENERAL SALARIES AND BENEFITS 201 018501 WORKERS COMP EXPERIENCE 10,452 11,108 11,108 -9,050 -9,050 0 TOTAL SALARIES AND BENEFITS $10,452 $11,108 $11,108 $-9,050 $-9,050 $0 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 201 032590 CHGS PAC MGMT COMM 152 210 1 0 201 032992 CHGS FAC MGMT HSHLD XP 0 0 114 120 120' 0 201 033103 INSUR XP MISCELLANEOUS 9, 120 10, 699 10, 699 10,662 10,662 0 201 033700 MAINTENANCE OF STRUCTURES 38,584 65,000 44,900 65, 000 112,000 47,000 201 033791 CHGS PAC MGMT MAINT STR 108,244 102,187 83,'124 105,000 137,000 32,000 201 034309 MISC XP PRIOR PERIOD REV ADJ 15,047 25,000 11,929 25,000 25,000 0 201 034]10 MISC XP PRIOR PERIOD EXP ADJ 0 0 10 0 0 0 201 034800 PROF & SPECIAL SERVICES 89,671 89,909 89,909 90,000 90,000 0 201 034811 PROF COLLECTIONS SVS 177,979 160,000 182,257 183,000 183,000 0 201 035700 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 0 1, 000,000 0 1,000,000 1,000,000 0 201 035940 TRANS/TRVL FUEL 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 0 201 035990 CHGS FLEET TRANS/TRVL 7,509 10,500 5,'1'12 5, 256 5,256 0 201 036100 UTILITIES 181.640 196,677 184,761 162,890 103,690 -59,200 TOTAL SERVICES AND SUPPLIES $627,946 $1,660,182 $614.082 $1,648,932 $1,668,732 $19,800 OTHER CHARGES 201 050001 CENTRAL SERVICE COST A-87 8,573 12,35'1 12,357 9,832 9,832 0 201 050003 BUILDING & EQUIPMENT USE A-87 2,315 2,315 2, 315 2, 315 2. 315 0 201 051391 CONTR TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1,290,951 1,322,253 1,209,821 1,210,3'10 1,210,3'10 0 TOTAL OTHER CHARGES $1,301,839 $1,336,925 $1,224,493 $1,222,517 $1,222,517 $0 OTHER FINANCING USES 201 095803 TRAN OUT COURTHOUSE BOND 531,308 530,6H 530,6<11 534,644 534,644 0 201 095804 TRAN OU~ JUSTICE CTR BOND 87,026 87,208 87.208 88,481 88,481 0 201 095925 TRAN OUT INFORMATION TECH 0 25,000 0 0 0 0 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES $618,334 $642,819 $617. 849 $623,125 $623,125 $0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES*****"******* $2,558,570 $3,651,064 $2,467,532 $3,485,524 $3,505,324 $19,800 Shasta County Recommended Budget, FY2014-15 ....................................................................................................... 105 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUDGET UNIT FINANCING DETAIL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 ACTUAL ADJUSTED ESTIMATED BUDGET BUDGET DIFFERENCE STATE CONTROLLER EXP/REV BUDGET EXP/REV REQUESTS RECOMMENDED REC 14-15 COUNTY BUDGET ACT (1985) 2012-13 2013-14 2013-14 2014-15 2014-15 RQST 14-15 FINES, FORFEITURES & PENALTIES 201 317500 VEHICLE CODE FINES 160,046 160.000 157' 102 157,000 157,000 0 201 317504 VCF BASE FINES COUNTY 474,302 480,000 467,088 4.67,000 467,000 0 201 318500 COURT FINES 55,521 35,000 31,056 31,000 31,000 0 201 318504 CF BASE FINES COUNTY 36,987 35,000 33,480 34,000 34,000 0 201 318525 COURT FINE SARB TRUANCY 216 350 1 0 0 0 201 318590 RESTITUTION FINES REBATE 17,400 15,000 13,014 13,000 13,000 0 201 319101 PENALTY ASSESSMENT 334,933 335,000 334,797 335,000 335,000 0 201 319102 VCF ADDITIONAL PARKING PENALTY 5,122 5,000 2,762 2,800 2. 800 0 201 319110 CRTHSE/CRIH JUST CONSTRUCTION 618,334 617,619 617,619 623,125 623,125 0 TOTAL FINES, FORFEITURES & PENALTIES $1,703,160 $1.682,969 $1,656,919 $1,662,925 $1, 662. 925 $0 REVENUE FROM MONEY & PROPERTY 201 420050 INTEREST ON COLLECTIONS "' 0 0 200 200 0 TOTAL REVENUE FROM MONEY & PROPERTY $377 $0 $0 $200 $200 $0 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 201 675100 CLERK FILING FEES 0 0 0 0 0 201 675101 RESTITUTION ADMIN FEE 14' 650" 15,000 13,474 14' 000 H.ooo 0 201 675240 GUARDIANSHIP FEES 2U 0 0 0 0 0 201 675260 FCS FILING FEES 5,575 6. 000 6,241 6,300 6,300 0 201 675500 COURT FEES 564 500 393 <00 400 0 201 675760 TRAFFIC SCHOOL ADMIN FEE 168,474 180,000 173,526 174,000 174. 000 0 201 675761 TRAFFIC VIOLATOR ($24) 111,713 120,000 113,371 114' 000 114' 000 0 201 675762 TRAFFIC VIOLATOR (HAL) 459,097 495,000 465,746 466,000 466,000 0 201 675771 PROOF OF CORRECTION ($10) 508 500 365 <00 400 0 201 675900 DUI SCHOOL ADMIN FEES 12,790 13' 000 10,858 11, 000 11,000 0 201 679915 RECORDING & INDEXING FEE 154,280 155,000 118, 5'J6 119,000 119,000 0 201 693001 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 115,141 130,800 73,042 75, 000 75,000 0 201 693006 CHGS FOR SVS COURT COLLECTIONS 177' 979 160,000 182,257 183,000 183,000 0 201 693010 RETURNED CHECK SERVICE CHARGE 2,164 3,500 2,592 2,600 2,600 0 TOTAL CHARGES FOR SERVICES $1,223,221 $1,279,300 $1,160,4111 $1,165,700 $1,165,700 $0 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 201 799390 PRIOR PERIOD EXP ADJUSTMENT 0 0 0 18,293 18,293 0 201 799391 PRIOR PERIOD REV ADJUSTMENT 0 0 7,244 0 0 0 TOTAL MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES $0 $0 $7,244 $18,293 $18,293 $0 $2,926,758 $2,962,269 $2,824,604 $2,847,118 $2,847,118 $0 TRIAL COURTS EXP OVER (UNDER) REV $-368,187 $688,795 $-357,012 $638,406 $658.206 $19,800 106 ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G
    TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G. Lees, County Administrative Officer PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The “Lockyer-Isenberg Trial Court Funding Act of 1997" (AB233), Chapter 850, became effective on January 1, 1998. The legislation finds and declares that the judiciary of California is a separate and independent branch of government, recognized by the Constitution and statutes of the State. The Legislature has previously established the principle that the funding of trial court operations California Rules of Court (CRC 810) is most logically a function of the state. Such funding is necessary to provide uniform standards and procedures, economies of scale, and structural efficiency and simplification. This decision also reflects the fact that the overwhelming business of the trial courts is to interpret and enforce provisions of state law and to resolve disputes among the people of the State of California. The County transferred responsibility for five court facilities to the Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), on December 17, 2008. The County is the managing party in three facilities: Burney Joint Use Building, Justice Center, and Juvenile Hall. The AOC is the managing party in the Main Courthouse and Courthouse Annex. A Joint Occupancy Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the County and the AOC memorialize the party’s roles and responsibilities. The County is obligated to pay the AOC an annual County Facility Payment (currently $457,370), to offset the Court’s historical expense for operations and maintenance of the court facilities. The expenses remaining in this budget unit are considered County costs under the rules of “trial court funding.” This includes court facilities, maintenance of effort (MOE) responsibilities, debt payment on courthouse renovation and justice center construction, and the costs associated with the collection division.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 28, 2007 WILLDAN GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 001-33076 14-1951112 (State of other jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer of incorporation) Identification No.) 2401 East Katella Avenue, Suite 300, Anaheim, California 92806 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 424-9144 Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2 below): o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425). o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14A-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR.14d-2(b)) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Item 2.03. Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement On December 28, 2007, Willdan Group, Inc., (the “Company”), entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) and a related Revolving Line of Credit Note (the “Note”), Security Agreement: Equipment and Continuing Security Agreement: Rights to Payment and Inventory (collectively with the Credit Agreement and the Note, the “Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”).
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet- Ca the Golden State.Pdf
    ur State Seal The design for the Great Seal of the State of California was adopted at the Constitutional Convention in 1849. Thirty-one stars are displayed, one for each state Owhich comprised the Union following the admission of California in 1850. Beneath these stars appears the motto, Eureka (in Greek, “I have found it!”). The peaks of the Sierra Nevada stand for the grandeur of nature. Shipping on San Francisco Bay typifies commerce. A minor laboring with pick, rocker, and pan represents industry. Agricultural wealth is seen in a sheaf of wheat and clusters of grapes. Keeping watch over this tableau is the armored figure of Minerva who, in classical Roman mythology, was the goddess of wisdom. Like the political birth of our state, she was born full grown from the brain of Jupiter, father of the gods and guardian of law and order. At her feet stands a grizzly bear, independent and formidable, symbolizing the State of California. Compiled and Edited by Daniel Alvarez, Secretary of the Senate by Bernadette McNulty, Chief Assistant Secretary Claudia Mendoza-Perez, Legislative Clerk Zach Twilla, Reading Clerk and Anabel Urbina, Legislative Clerk April 2018 Printed on Recycled Paper alifornia The Golden State HOW WE BECAME A STATE The Name of Our State ..................................................................................................................... 1 The First Californians ........................................................................................................................ 2 Exploration and SettlementC
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of Elisha Oscar Crosby; Reminiscences of California and Guatemala from 1849 to 1864
    Memoirs of Elisha Oscar Crosby; reminiscences of California and Guatemala from 1849 to 1864. Edited by Charles Albro Barker ELISHA OSCAR CROSBY Memoirs OF ELISHA OSCAR CROSBY REMINISCENCES OF CALIFORNIA AND GUATEMALA FROM 1849 TO 1864 Edited by Charles Albro Barker The Huntington Library, San Marino, California 1945 Copyright, 1945 By the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery Printed by ANDERSON & RITCHIE: THE WARD RITCHIE PRESS Los Angeles Contents Memoirs of Elisha Oscar Crosby; reminiscences of California and Guatemala from 1849 to 1864. Edited by Charles Albro Barker http:// www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.071 Page INTRODUCTION ix BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE ON THE CROSBY PAPERS xxiii REMINISCENCES OF CALIFORNIA AND GUATEMALA Beginnings in New York State and City 3 An Argonaut by Way of Panama 9 California No Humbug 17 The State Constitution of 1849 33 Launching the State Government 51 United States Commission to Settle Mexican Titles 65 Guatemala in Civil War Diplomacy 75 APPENDIX: “ANECDOTAL SCRAPS” 107 INDEX 117 vii List of Illustrations ELISHA OSCAR CROSBY Frontispiece Photograph by E. Graybiel, Alameda FACING PAGE STEAMSHIP “CALIFORNIA” 23 The first steamship tp enter San francisco Bay. Photograph, by Bradley and Fulofson, made Feb. 28, 1874, on the 25th annimversary of her first entrance to the Bay, all the surviving passengers of the first trip being aboard. COLTON HALL, MONTEREY 39 Meeting place of the Constitutional Convention of 1849. Photograph (made about 1889) from the C. C. Pierce Collection of the Huntington Library. ix Introduction THE manuscript “Memoirs and Reminiscences” of Elisha Oscar Crosby, forty-niner, California lawyer and public figure, and United States diplomat in Central America, are here published for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • State Court Systems Profiles Comparative Research
    State Court Systems Profiles Co mpiled by: The Office of the State Courts Administrator Strategic Pla nning Unit August 25 th, 2010 Contents (Press <ctrl> and click to navigate) Alabama 1 I. State Overview and Demographics 1 II. State Court System 2 III. Governance 3 Image - Alabama Judicial Branch 10 Arizona 11 I. State Overview and Demographics 11 II. State Court System 12 III. Governance 14 Image - Arizona Judicial Council and Standing Committees 20 California 21 I. State Overview and Demographics 21 II. State Court System 22 III. Governance 24 Image - California Judicial Branch 38 Minnesota 39 I. State Overview and Demographics 39 II. State Court System 40 III. Governance 42 Image - Minnesota Judicial Branch Administrative Structure 53 Missouri 54 I. State Overview and Demographics 54 II. State Court System 55 III. Governance 56 Nevada 62 I. State Overview and Demographics 62 II. State Court System 63 III. Governance 65 New Jersey 70 I. State Overview and Demographics 70 II. State Court System 71 III. Governance 72 New York 78 I. State Overview and Demographics 78 II. State Court System 79 III. Governance 80 Image - New York Court Structure 85 Image - New York Administrative Structure 86 Utah 87 I. State Overview and Demographics 87 II. State Court System 88 III. Governance 90 Vermont 98 I. State Overview and Demographics 98 II. State Court System 99 III. Governance 100 Virginia 106 I. State Overview and Demographics 106 II. State Court System 107 III. Governance 108 Image - Virginia Judicial Branch 119 Alabama I. State Overview and
    [Show full text]
  • Oasis Charter Approved Petition
    UNDER CONSTRUCTION EDUCATIONAL NETWORK, Inc. an educational non-profit, helping to build community understanding of learning and teaching Charter Petition for the term July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2021 Submitted to Alisal Union School District on January 11, 2016 Approved on March 9, 2016 by the AUSD Board of Trustees Table of Contents Charter Petition Submission by the Lead Petitioner ....................................................................... 1 Rationale for Renewal..................................................................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................. 2 Curriculum and Instruction ......................................................................................................... 3 Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBA) 2015 Baseline Results .................................................... 8 Legal Requirement for Renewal ............................................................................................... 13 Affirmations and Assurances ........................................................................................................ 17 Element A: The Educational Program .......................................................................................... 19 Whom the school will educate .................................................................................................. 19 Mission and Vision ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IV. the Role of the Juvenile Court Judge
    IV. The Role of the Juvenile Court Judge The most important person in the juvenile seventeen adopted children (urine smell, limited 172 court is the juvenile court judge. The descriptions food, poor lighting, no bed sheets). of the different systems reveal the unique role of the It may not be the best of care out in Nassau juvenile court judge, a role that includes many County, but the children are surviving. non-traditional functions. The role of the juvenile They're doing okay. court judge combines judicial, administrative, The judge responded: I don't want the chil- collaborative and advocacy components. 173 dren to survive. I want them to thrive. The most traditional role of the juvenile court judge is to decide the legal issues in each of the Juvenile court judges' decisions also set standards described categories of cases. The judge must within the community and in the systems con- determine issues such as whether certain facts are nected to the court. The juvenile court judge who true, whether a child should be removed from a removes a child for selling drugs, who refuses to parent, what types of services should be offered to hear a truancy petition because it is not important the family and whether the child should be enough or who returns a child to her family in spite returned to the family and the community or of drug abuse by one of the family members is placed permanently in another setting. setting standards which may have a significant impact on how police, probation, social services Clearly these are critical decisions, not only and other service providers respond to similar for the family before the court, but also for society.
    [Show full text]
  • California Highways and Public Works, November 1927
    TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1..,1:, Front Coyer !)iclure-Antoing in Decem­ ber in California, a San /lhteo Count)' View. CaliCornm ~I0t1l1t8in f1ighw8.r&-li·,·td S. Moody J Building Home'! tor Stttte ''-'i h-P. T. Pooge_ 4 Out F'ishill· _ San Gabriel \Yater ProbleID!l-Harold CDflk. ling 6 1';a\"(' tI e neaehK--GoveNlor ('. C. rfHn'!l____ 'j Gontflor Ynunl! )ftwf"!'l to , \"e Recreational Areas In e.h(nrnIA . I) T~lls Stor')" of Stale's Growth__ 9 Building a Highway Wllile 6000 AutornoLiles )rO\'e Along the &o8d_______________ 10 Du.triet Onke Oudw Wins Praise._________ 1] Elephant OwneMl Tau 1'\oti~_.____________ 12 SUI ftleing Tf'f'stml'llt :Method or Oiling Roads T E. Sfa,.tofL. .__ 13 EditorialJl .__ 14 CaliCornia lIighwll)"S News AI d Comment.___ 16 The Kew LItke Allll/mor Cllu8Cwny_____ 19 SenAtor Oddie Urb"CS More l;'ederol Aid lor nOllds _ .________ 20 li'ederlll Aid l"igure~ Cor Cttlifornia_________ 21 Slat. """way bGl",_n OntJl.rlo Illul Rlve..- Tlle StaLe Press on"llot Dog" Stand,,_______ 22 .lie, In RI.....lJId. CO\lnt:r. Rough Going 23 CommnlliClltiolll~ ._______ 26 Along the COIICrellJ • 27 Grade Crossitlg' SitUlIl.ioll_.____________ 27 Ifighway Work in Calirornilt CouuLie:J • 31 From Other States_________________________ 87 Opening of Road Bids and Awat'ds___________ 37 Wal.f'r Permits and Applications____________ 39 .. ... ."'- California s Mounla on Highway By F o OY, Member of the CD. ifoml l:lI~h\V. y Co mJss1on. ROES SCEmC DIVERSIFICATIOC\'" FRED S. l\{oou~.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Renewal Petition
    LAUSD BOARD APPROVED 12/13/16 (BR 238-16/17) TERM: 2017-2022 CHARTER RENEWAL PETITION for a Five‐Year Term (July 1, 2017 ‐ June 30, 2022) Submitted to the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education Submitted October 17, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS ASSURANCES, AFFIRMATIONS, AND DECLARATIONS ................................................................ v ELEMENT 1 – THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM .............................................................................. 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 1 A. GENERAL INFORMATION TABLE........................................................................................... 1 COMMUNITY NEED FOR CHARTER SCHOOL ....................................................................... 2 B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE DURING THE CURRENT CHARTER TERM .................................................. 3 C. SUCCESS OF THE INNOVATIVE FEATURES OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ................................ 17 D. SUCCESS OF THE SCHOOL’S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM IN MEETING THE SPECIFIC NEEDS OF ITS STUDENT POPULATION ................................................................................................... 18 E. AREAS OF CHALLENGE THE SCHOOL HAS EXPERIENCED AND HOW THEY HAVE BEEN/WILL BE IMPROVED ................................................................................................................... 18 STUDENT POPULATION TO BE SERVED ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ánimo Charter Middle School 8 a California Public Charter School
    Ánimo Charter Middle School 8 A California Public Charter School Request for Five-Year Term July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2021 Submitted to the Board of Education of the Los Angeles Unified School District October 15, 2015 Ánimo Charter Middle School 8 (2016-2021) October 2015 Table of Contents Assurances and Affirmations ........................................................................................................................ 3 Element 1: The Educational Program ........................................................................................................... 4 Element 2: Measureable Pupil Outcomes and Element 3: Method by which Pupil Progress Toward Outcomes will be Measured ........................................................................................................................ 48 Element 4: Governance ............................................................................................................................... 64 Element 5: Employee Qualifications .......................................................................................................... 78 Element 6: Health and Safety Procedures ................................................................................................... 88 Element 7: Means to Achieve Racial and Ethnic Balance .......................................................................... 90 Element 8: Admissions Requirements ........................................................................................................ 94 Element 9: Annual
    [Show full text]
  • ASSEMBLY BILL No. 233
    AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 19, 1997 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 5, 1997 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 1, 1997 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 8, 1997 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 10, 1997 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—1997–98 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 233 Introduced by Assembly Members Escutia and Pringle (Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Cardoza and Morrow) (Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar, Baca, Brewer, Kuehl, Machado, Migden, Papan, Perata, Shelley, Sweeney, and Thomson) February 6, 1997 An act to amend Section 116.230 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to amend Section 1852 of the Family Code, to amend Sections 26820.4, 26823, 26827, 26827.4, 26830, 26832, 26833, 26835, 26836, 26837, 26838, 26850, 26851, 26852, 26853, 26855, 26857, 26862, 27361, 68073, 68085, 68090.8, 68113, 72054, 72055, 72060, 75103.5, 76000, and 77003 of, to add Sections 27081.5, 68073.1, 68085.5, 68088, 72056.01, 76224, 77001, and 77009 to, to add Chapter 14 (commencing with Section 77600) to, Title 8 of, to repeal Article 4 (commencing with Section 77300) of Chapter 13 of Title 8 of, to add and repeal Section 26826.01 of, to repeal and add Section 71383 of, and to repeal and add Article 3 (commencing with Section 77200) of 94 AB 233 — 2 — Chapter 13 of Title 8 of, the Government Code, to amend Sections 1463.001, 1463.005, 1463.007, 1463.009, and 1464 of, to add Sections 1463.010 and 1463.07 to, and to repeal Sections 1463.003 and 1463.01 of, the Penal Code, and to add Sections 11205.1 and 42007.1 to, and to amend, repeal, and add Section 42007 of, the Vehicle Code, relating to trial court funding, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Petition for Ánimo Pat Brown Charter High School California Public Charter Schools
    Charter Petition for Ánimo Pat Brown Charter High School California Public Charter Schools Ánimo Pat Brown Charter High School Renewal Petition 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 ASSURANCES AND AFFIRMATIONS 6 ELEMENT 1: THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM 7 ELEMENT 2: MEASURABLE PUPIL OUTCOMES and 66 ELEMENT 3: METHOD BY WHICH PUPIL PROGRESS TOWARD OUTCOMES WILL BE MEASURED ELEMENT 4: GOVERNANCE 85 ELEMENT 5: EMPLOYEE QUALIFICATIONS 101 ELEMENT 6: HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES 110 ELEMENT 7: MEANS TO ACHIEVE RACIAL AND ETHNIC BALANCE 112 ELEMENT 8: ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS 116 ELEMENT 9: ANNUAL FINANCIAL AUDITS 119 ELEMENT 10: SUSPENSION AND EXPULSION PROCEDURES 121 ELEMENT 11: EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 134 ELEMENT 12: PUBLIC SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ALTERNATIVES 135 ELEMENT 13: RIGHTS OF DISTRICT EMPLOYEES 136 ELEMENT 14: MANDATORY DISPUTE RESOLUTION 137 ELEMENT 15: EXCLUSIVE PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYER 139 ELEMENT 16: CHARTER SCHOOL CLOSURE PROCEDURES 140 ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 147 APPENDIX FINANCIAL PLAN 154 COURT-ORDERED INTEGRATION PLAN 159 ATTENDANCE ACCOUNTING 161 SERVICES PROVIDED BY GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 162 FUNDING MODEL – DIRECTLY FUNDED 166 DISSEMINATION OF PRACTICE 167 TEACHER’S UNION CONTRACT 168 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION & BYLAWS OF GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 169 DISCIPLINE REVIEW PANEL – EXPULSION HEARING SCRIPT 170 PARENT STUDENT HANDBOOK 171 Ánimo Pat Brown Charter High School Renewal Petition 2 GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Strategy for Transforming Los Angeles Secondary Public Education Green Dot Public Schools (“Green Dot”), a non-profit charter management organization, is leading the charge to transform public education in Los Angeles and beyond so that all children receive the education they need to be successful in college, leadership and life.
    [Show full text]