DOCSLIB.ORG

TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G. Lees, County Administrative Officer PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The “Lockyer-Isenberg Trial Court Funding Act of 1997" (AB233), Chapter 850, became effective on January 1, 1998. The legislation finds and declares that the judiciary of California is a separate and independent branch of government, recognized by the Constitution and statutes of the State. The Legislature has previously established the principle that the funding of trial court operations California Rules of Court (CRC 810) is most logically a function of the state. Such funding is necessary to provide uniform standards and procedures, economies of scale, and structural efficiency and simplification. This decision also reflects the fact that the overwhelming business of the trial courts is to interpret and enforce provisions of state law and to resolve disputes among the people of the State of California. The County transferred responsibility for five court facilities to the Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), on December 17, 2008. The County is the managing party in three facilities: Burney Joint Use Building, Justice Center, and Juvenile Hall. The AOC is the managing party in the Main Courthouse and Courthouse Annex. A Joint Occupancy Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the County and the AOC memorialize the party’s roles and responsibilities. The County is obligated to pay the AOC an annual County Facility Payment (currently $457,370), to offset the Court’s historical expense for operations and maintenance of the court facilities. The expenses remaining in this budget unit are considered County costs under the rules of “trial court funding.” This includes court facilities, maintenance of effort (MOE) responsibilities, debt payment on courthouse renovation and justice center construction, and the costs associated with the collection division. They also include the County Facility Payment (CFP) and revenues received from the AOC for the Court’s share of operations and maintenance in the facilities managed by the County. Starting in FY 2010-11, this budget also includes costs to relocate staff from the Public Safety Building. Other Revenue consists of fines, fees, and forfeitures collected pursuant to various legislative codes and retained by the County. BUDGET REQUESTS The costs remaining in the County’s Court budget are for non-CRC 810 costs. This includes court facilities, the maintenance of effort (MOE) allocation, debt payments on the Justice Center facility and the Courthouse renovation project, inmate transportation, and all costs associated with the collection division. In December 2008 the County transferred responsibility for 5 court facilities to the Administrative Office of the Courts. The County Facility Payment (CFP) is $457,370. Total requested appropriations for FY 2011-12 are $3.7 million. Since FY 2009-10, revenues have declined over $350,000, a symptom of the continuing economic downturn which affects the public’s ability to pay court fines and fees. Requested revenues are $3.2 million. This budget unit has historically returned resources to the General Fund. The requested budget will not return resources, and will require a net county cost of $474,629. This is largely due to the continuing decline in revenues, and the addition of $1 million to relocate staff from the Public Safety Building. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS The CAO recommended budget is as requested by the department head, with two exceptions: 1) Transfers $100,000 to the Land Building and Improvements budget unit for costs associated with County due diligence for the sale of the Public Safety Building and adjacent parking to the State for locating a new Redding Courthouse Building; and 2) appropriates $25,000 for a Wireless Bridge System, a point-to-point wireless system to bypass the Public Safety building for network connectivity to CalWORKS and the Redding Police Department. 105 PENDING ISSUES AND POLICY CONSIDERATIONS The nuance of the transfer of responsibility for the Court facilities is still unclear. We have little history on which to project the operations and maintenance charges for the facilities and the receipt of revenue from the AOC for the same. Amendments to this budget may be necessary as the year progresses. The AOC received site selection approval for the New Redding Courthouse from the State Public Works Board with respect to a 4.8 acre site, which is comprised of parcels of real property owned by Shasta County and private parties. County parcels are comprised of the Public Safety Building, which is commonly known as 1525 Court Street, and the surface parking. In preparation for vacating the Public Safety Building, the CAO appropriated funds for a records destruction process to reduce storage requirements. The Probation Department and the Sheriff have been actively engaged in records management throughout the 2010-11 fiscal year. Additionally, Information Technology has been planning for the relocation of the telecommunications link between the Public Safety Building, the Court, City of Redding Police Department, and CalWORKS. CAO staff have been working to secure office space for the Sheriff and Probation until such time as they can move into the main courthouse and annex once the Court has vacated. The third floor of the Public Safety Building has been vacant since the District Attorney moved to newly remodeled offices in June 2010. Future budgets will be impacted by the need to provide alternative office space for both Probation and Sheriff staff and operations during the construction of the new courthouse and the remodel of the existing courthouse. The Court will exchange their equity interest in the Main Courthouse/Courthouse Annex and the Justice Center (retaining their equity interest in the Court parking), for the County’s equity in the Public Safety Building and parking parcels. The Court will owe the County $710,000, less any cost to deliver the site to the AOC clean of all encumbrances. This revenue is not budgeted pending resolution of the Property Acquisition Agreement between the AOC and the County. DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE OR APPEAL This budget was prepared by, and is recommended by, the County Administrative Office. 106 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUDGET UNIT FINANCING DETAIL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 ACTUAL ADJUSTED ESTIMATED BUDGET CAO DIFFERENCE STATE CONTROLLER EXP/REV BUDGET EXP/REV REQUESTS RECOMMENDS CAO 11-12 COUNTY BUDGET ACT (1985) 2009-10 2010-11 2010-11 2011-12 2011-12 RQST 11-12 =============================================== ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ =========== UNIT TITLE: 201 TRIAL COURTS FUNCTION: PUBLIC PROTECTION ACTIVITY: JUDICIAL FUND:0060 GENERAL SALARIES AND BENEFITS 201 018501 WORKERS COMP EXPERIENCE 0 3,121 0 11,468 11,468 0 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ TOTAL SALARIES AND BENEFITS $0 $3,121 $0 $11,468 $11,468 $0 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 201 032590 CHGS FAC MGMT COMM 276 312 312 330 330 0 201 033103 INSUR XP MISCELLANEOUS 13,272 10,131 10,128 9,724 9,724 0 201 033700 MAINTENANCE OF STRUCTURES 64,036 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 0 201 033791 CHGS FAC MGMT MAINT STR 133,127 167,520 122,322 155,659 155,659 0 201 034309 MISC XP PRIOR PERIOD REV ADJ 8,266 0 0 0 0 0 201 034800 PROF & SPECIAL SERVICES 88,002 91,920 99,923 93,000 93,000 0 201 034811 PROF COLLECTIONS SVS 201,288 185,000 178,971 182,000 182,000 0 201 035100 RENTS & LEASES OF EQUIPMENT 202 203 0 81 81 0 201 035700 SPECIAL DEPARTMENTAL EXPENSE 0 50,000 200,000 1,000,000 875,000 -125,000 201 035990 CHGS FLEET TRANS/TRVL 12,243 15,000 15,069 15,000 15,000 0 201 036100 UTILITIES 182,554 186,519 184,429 184,793 184,793 0 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ TOTAL SERVICES AND SUPPLIES $703,267 $776,605 $881,154 $1,710,587 $1,585,587 $-125,000 OTHER CHARGES 201 050001 CENTRAL SERVICE COST A-87 14,763 13,904 13,904 7,996 7,996 0 201 050003 BUILDING & EQUIPMENT USE A-87 57,009 -44,750 -44,750 -48,450 -48,450 0 201 051391 CONTR TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1,447,631 1,499,154 1,499,155 1,366,753 1,366,753 0 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ TOTAL OTHER CHARGES $1,519,402 $1,468,308 $1,468,309 $1,326,299 $1,326,299 $0 CAPITAL ASSETS 201 065196 1 WIRELESS BRIDGE SYSTEM 0 0 0 0 25,000 25,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ TOTAL CAPITAL ASSETS $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 $25,000 OTHER FINANCING USES 201 095803 TRAN OUT COURTHOUSE BOND 616,356 609,780 609,780 619,380 619,380 0 201 095804 TRAN OUT JUSTICE CTR BOND 84,628 84,686 84,686 86,626 86,626 0 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ TOTAL OTHER FINANCING USES $700,985 $694,466 $694,466 $706,006 $706,006 $0 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ TOTAL EXPENDITURES************* $2,923,654 $2,942,500 $3,043,929 $3,754,360 $3,654,360 $-100,000 ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ 107 REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUDGET UNIT FINANCING DETAIL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2011-2012 ACTUAL ADJUSTED ESTIMATED BUDGET CAO DIFFERENCE STATE CONTROLLER EXP/REV BUDGET EXP/REV REQUESTS RECOMMENDS CAO 11-12 COUNTY BUDGET ACT (1985) 2009-10 2010-11 2010-11 2011-12 2011-12 RQST 11-12 =============================================== ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ =========== FINES, FORFEITURES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 28, 2007 WILLDAN GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 001-33076 14-1951112 (State of other jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer of incorporation) Identification No.) 2401 East Katella Avenue, Suite 300, Anaheim, California 92806 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 424-9144 Not Applicable (Former name or former address, if changed since last report) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2 below): o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425). o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14A-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR.14d-2(b)) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Item 2.03. Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement On December 28, 2007, Willdan Group, Inc., (the “Company”), entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) and a related Revolving Line of Credit Note (the “Note”), Security Agreement: Equipment and Continuing Security Agreement: Rights to Payment and Inventory (collectively with the Credit Agreement and the Note, the “Agreements”) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”).
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet- Ca the Golden State.Pdf
    ur State Seal The design for the Great Seal of the State of California was adopted at the Constitutional Convention in 1849. Thirty-one stars are displayed, one for each state Owhich comprised the Union following the admission of California in 1850. Beneath these stars appears the motto, Eureka (in Greek, “I have found it!”). The peaks of the Sierra Nevada stand for the grandeur of nature. Shipping on San Francisco Bay typifies commerce. A minor laboring with pick, rocker, and pan represents industry. Agricultural wealth is seen in a sheaf of wheat and clusters of grapes. Keeping watch over this tableau is the armored figure of Minerva who, in classical Roman mythology, was the goddess of wisdom. Like the political birth of our state, she was born full grown from the brain of Jupiter, father of the gods and guardian of law and order. At her feet stands a grizzly bear, independent and formidable, symbolizing the State of California. Compiled and Edited by Daniel Alvarez, Secretary of the Senate by Bernadette McNulty, Chief Assistant Secretary Claudia Mendoza-Perez, Legislative Clerk Zach Twilla, Reading Clerk and Anabel Urbina, Legislative Clerk April 2018 Printed on Recycled Paper alifornia The Golden State HOW WE BECAME A STATE The Name of Our State ..................................................................................................................... 1 The First Californians ........................................................................................................................ 2 Exploration and SettlementC
    [Show full text]
  • Memoirs of Elisha Oscar Crosby; Reminiscences of California and Guatemala from 1849 to 1864
    Memoirs of Elisha Oscar Crosby; reminiscences of California and Guatemala from 1849 to 1864. Edited by Charles Albro Barker ELISHA OSCAR CROSBY Memoirs OF ELISHA OSCAR CROSBY REMINISCENCES OF CALIFORNIA AND GUATEMALA FROM 1849 TO 1864 Edited by Charles Albro Barker The Huntington Library, San Marino, California 1945 Copyright, 1945 By the Henry E. Huntington Library and Art Gallery Printed by ANDERSON & RITCHIE: THE WARD RITCHIE PRESS Los Angeles Contents Memoirs of Elisha Oscar Crosby; reminiscences of California and Guatemala from 1849 to 1864. Edited by Charles Albro Barker http:// www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.071 Page INTRODUCTION ix BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE ON THE CROSBY PAPERS xxiii REMINISCENCES OF CALIFORNIA AND GUATEMALA Beginnings in New York State and City 3 An Argonaut by Way of Panama 9 California No Humbug 17 The State Constitution of 1849 33 Launching the State Government 51 United States Commission to Settle Mexican Titles 65 Guatemala in Civil War Diplomacy 75 APPENDIX: “ANECDOTAL SCRAPS” 107 INDEX 117 vii List of Illustrations ELISHA OSCAR CROSBY Frontispiece Photograph by E. Graybiel, Alameda FACING PAGE STEAMSHIP “CALIFORNIA” 23 The first steamship tp enter San francisco Bay. Photograph, by Bradley and Fulofson, made Feb. 28, 1874, on the 25th annimversary of her first entrance to the Bay, all the surviving passengers of the first trip being aboard. COLTON HALL, MONTEREY 39 Meeting place of the Constitutional Convention of 1849. Photograph (made about 1889) from the C. C. Pierce Collection of the Huntington Library. ix Introduction THE manuscript “Memoirs and Reminiscences” of Elisha Oscar Crosby, forty-niner, California lawyer and public figure, and United States diplomat in Central America, are here published for the first time.
    [Show full text]
  • State Court Systems Profiles Comparative Research
    State Court Systems Profiles Co mpiled by: The Office of the State Courts Administrator Strategic Pla nning Unit August 25 th, 2010 Contents (Press <ctrl> and click to navigate) Alabama 1 I. State Overview and Demographics 1 II. State Court System 2 III. Governance 3 Image - Alabama Judicial Branch 10 Arizona 11 I. State Overview and Demographics 11 II. State Court System 12 III. Governance 14 Image - Arizona Judicial Council and Standing Committees 20 California 21 I. State Overview and Demographics 21 II. State Court System 22 III. Governance 24 Image - California Judicial Branch 38 Minnesota 39 I. State Overview and Demographics 39 II. State Court System 40 III. Governance 42 Image - Minnesota Judicial Branch Administrative Structure 53 Missouri 54 I. State Overview and Demographics 54 II. State Court System 55 III. Governance 56 Nevada 62 I. State Overview and Demographics 62 II. State Court System 63 III. Governance 65 New Jersey 70 I. State Overview and Demographics 70 II. State Court System 71 III. Governance 72 New York 78 I. State Overview and Demographics 78 II. State Court System 79 III. Governance 80 Image - New York Court Structure 85 Image - New York Administrative Structure 86 Utah 87 I. State Overview and Demographics 87 II. State Court System 88 III. Governance 90 Vermont 98 I. State Overview and Demographics 98 II. State Court System 99 III. Governance 100 Virginia 106 I. State Overview and Demographics 106 II. State Court System 107 III. Governance 108 Image - Virginia Judicial Branch 119 Alabama I. State Overview and
    [Show full text]
  • Oasis Charter Approved Petition
    UNDER CONSTRUCTION EDUCATIONAL NETWORK, Inc. an educational non-profit, helping to build community understanding of learning and teaching Charter Petition for the term July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2021 Submitted to Alisal Union School District on January 11, 2016 Approved on March 9, 2016 by the AUSD Board of Trustees Table of Contents Charter Petition Submission by the Lead Petitioner ....................................................................... 1 Rationale for Renewal..................................................................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................. 2 Curriculum and Instruction ......................................................................................................... 3 Smarter Balanced Assessment (SBA) 2015 Baseline Results .................................................... 8 Legal Requirement for Renewal ............................................................................................... 13 Affirmations and Assurances ........................................................................................................ 17 Element A: The Educational Program .......................................................................................... 19 Whom the school will educate .................................................................................................. 19 Mission and Vision ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G
    TRIAL COURTS Fund 0060 General, Department 201 Lawrence G. Lees, County Executive Officer PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The "Lockyer-Isenberg Trial Court Funding Act of 1997" (AB233), Chapter 850, became effective on January 1, 1998. The legislation finds and declares that the judiciary of California is a separate and independent branch of government, recognized by the Constitution and statutes of the State. The Legislature has previously established the principle that the funding of trial court operations California Rules of Court (CRC 810) is most logically a function of the state. Such funding is necessary to provide uniform standards and procedures, economies of scale, and structural efficiency and simplification. This decision also reflects the fact that the overwhelming business of the trial courts is to interpret and enforce provisions of state law and to resolve disputes among the people of the State of California. The County transferred responsibility for five court facilities to the Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), on December 17, 2008. The County is the managing party in three facilities: Burney Joint Use Building, Justice Center, and Juvenile Hall. The AOC is the managing party in the Main Courthouse and Courthouse Annex. A Joint Occupancy Agreement and Memorandum of Understanding between the County and the AOC memorialize the party's roles and responsibilities. The County is obligated to pay the AOC an annual County Facility Payment (currently $457,370), to offset the Court's historical expense for operations and maintenance of the court facilities. The expenses remaining in this budget unit are considered County costs under the rules of "trial court funding." This includes court facilities, maintenance of effort (MOE) responsibilities, debt payment on courthouse renovation and justice center construction, and the costs associated with the collection division.
    [Show full text]
  • IV. the Role of the Juvenile Court Judge
    IV. The Role of the Juvenile Court Judge The most important person in the juvenile seventeen adopted children (urine smell, limited 172 court is the juvenile court judge. The descriptions food, poor lighting, no bed sheets). of the different systems reveal the unique role of the It may not be the best of care out in Nassau juvenile court judge, a role that includes many County, but the children are surviving. non-traditional functions. The role of the juvenile They're doing okay. court judge combines judicial, administrative, The judge responded: I don't want the chil- collaborative and advocacy components. 173 dren to survive. I want them to thrive. The most traditional role of the juvenile court judge is to decide the legal issues in each of the Juvenile court judges' decisions also set standards described categories of cases. The judge must within the community and in the systems con- determine issues such as whether certain facts are nected to the court. The juvenile court judge who true, whether a child should be removed from a removes a child for selling drugs, who refuses to parent, what types of services should be offered to hear a truancy petition because it is not important the family and whether the child should be enough or who returns a child to her family in spite returned to the family and the community or of drug abuse by one of the family members is placed permanently in another setting. setting standards which may have a significant impact on how police, probation, social services Clearly these are critical decisions, not only and other service providers respond to similar for the family before the court, but also for society.
    [Show full text]
  • California Highways and Public Works, November 1927
    TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1..,1:, Front Coyer !)iclure-Antoing in Decem­ ber in California, a San /lhteo Count)' View. CaliCornm ~I0t1l1t8in f1ighw8.r&-li·,·td S. Moody J Building Home'! tor Stttte ''-'i h-P. T. Pooge_ 4 Out F'ishill· _ San Gabriel \Yater ProbleID!l-Harold CDflk. ling 6 1';a\"(' tI e neaehK--GoveNlor ('. C. rfHn'!l____ 'j Gontflor Ynunl! )ftwf"!'l to , \"e Recreational Areas In e.h(nrnIA . I) T~lls Stor')" of Stale's Growth__ 9 Building a Highway Wllile 6000 AutornoLiles )rO\'e Along the &o8d_______________ 10 Du.triet Onke Oudw Wins Praise._________ 1] Elephant OwneMl Tau 1'\oti~_.____________ 12 SUI ftleing Tf'f'stml'llt :Method or Oiling Roads T E. Sfa,.tofL. .__ 13 EditorialJl .__ 14 CaliCornia lIighwll)"S News AI d Comment.___ 16 The Kew LItke Allll/mor Cllu8Cwny_____ 19 SenAtor Oddie Urb"CS More l;'ederol Aid lor nOllds _ .________ 20 li'ederlll Aid l"igure~ Cor Cttlifornia_________ 21 Slat. """way bGl",_n OntJl.rlo Illul Rlve..- Tlle StaLe Press on"llot Dog" Stand,,_______ 22 .lie, In RI.....lJId. CO\lnt:r. Rough Going 23 CommnlliClltiolll~ ._______ 26 Along the COIICrellJ • 27 Grade Crossitlg' SitUlIl.ioll_.____________ 27 Ifighway Work in Calirornilt CouuLie:J • 31 From Other States_________________________ 87 Opening of Road Bids and Awat'ds___________ 37 Wal.f'r Permits and Applications____________ 39 .. ... ."'- California s Mounla on Highway By F o OY, Member of the CD. ifoml l:lI~h\V. y Co mJss1on. ROES SCEmC DIVERSIFICATIOC\'" FRED S. l\{oou~.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Renewal Petition
    LAUSD BOARD APPROVED 12/13/16 (BR 238-16/17) TERM: 2017-2022 CHARTER RENEWAL PETITION for a Five‐Year Term (July 1, 2017 ‐ June 30, 2022) Submitted to the Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education Submitted October 17, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS ASSURANCES, AFFIRMATIONS, AND DECLARATIONS ................................................................ v ELEMENT 1 – THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM .............................................................................. 1 GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 1 A. GENERAL INFORMATION TABLE........................................................................................... 1 COMMUNITY NEED FOR CHARTER SCHOOL ....................................................................... 2 B. SCHOOL PERFORMANCE DURING THE CURRENT CHARTER TERM .................................................. 3 C. SUCCESS OF THE INNOVATIVE FEATURES OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ................................ 17 D. SUCCESS OF THE SCHOOL’S EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM IN MEETING THE SPECIFIC NEEDS OF ITS STUDENT POPULATION ................................................................................................... 18 E. AREAS OF CHALLENGE THE SCHOOL HAS EXPERIENCED AND HOW THEY HAVE BEEN/WILL BE IMPROVED ................................................................................................................... 18 STUDENT POPULATION TO BE SERVED ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ánimo Charter Middle School 8 a California Public Charter School
    Ánimo Charter Middle School 8 A California Public Charter School Request for Five-Year Term July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2021 Submitted to the Board of Education of the Los Angeles Unified School District October 15, 2015 Ánimo Charter Middle School 8 (2016-2021) October 2015 Table of Contents Assurances and Affirmations ........................................................................................................................ 3 Element 1: The Educational Program ........................................................................................................... 4 Element 2: Measureable Pupil Outcomes and Element 3: Method by which Pupil Progress Toward Outcomes will be Measured ........................................................................................................................ 48 Element 4: Governance ............................................................................................................................... 64 Element 5: Employee Qualifications .......................................................................................................... 78 Element 6: Health and Safety Procedures ................................................................................................... 88 Element 7: Means to Achieve Racial and Ethnic Balance .......................................................................... 90 Element 8: Admissions Requirements ........................................................................................................ 94 Element 9: Annual
    [Show full text]
  • ASSEMBLY BILL No. 233
    AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 19, 1997 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 5, 1997 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 1, 1997 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 8, 1997 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MARCH 10, 1997 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE—1997–98 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL No. 233 Introduced by Assembly Members Escutia and Pringle (Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Cardoza and Morrow) (Coauthors: Assembly Members Aguiar, Baca, Brewer, Kuehl, Machado, Migden, Papan, Perata, Shelley, Sweeney, and Thomson) February 6, 1997 An act to amend Section 116.230 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to amend Section 1852 of the Family Code, to amend Sections 26820.4, 26823, 26827, 26827.4, 26830, 26832, 26833, 26835, 26836, 26837, 26838, 26850, 26851, 26852, 26853, 26855, 26857, 26862, 27361, 68073, 68085, 68090.8, 68113, 72054, 72055, 72060, 75103.5, 76000, and 77003 of, to add Sections 27081.5, 68073.1, 68085.5, 68088, 72056.01, 76224, 77001, and 77009 to, to add Chapter 14 (commencing with Section 77600) to, Title 8 of, to repeal Article 4 (commencing with Section 77300) of Chapter 13 of Title 8 of, to add and repeal Section 26826.01 of, to repeal and add Section 71383 of, and to repeal and add Article 3 (commencing with Section 77200) of 94 AB 233 — 2 — Chapter 13 of Title 8 of, the Government Code, to amend Sections 1463.001, 1463.005, 1463.007, 1463.009, and 1464 of, to add Sections 1463.010 and 1463.07 to, and to repeal Sections 1463.003 and 1463.01 of, the Penal Code, and to add Sections 11205.1 and 42007.1 to, and to amend, repeal, and add Section 42007 of, the Vehicle Code, relating to trial court funding, making an appropriation therefor, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Petition for Ánimo Pat Brown Charter High School California Public Charter Schools
    Charter Petition for Ánimo Pat Brown Charter High School California Public Charter Schools Ánimo Pat Brown Charter High School Renewal Petition 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 ASSURANCES AND AFFIRMATIONS 6 ELEMENT 1: THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM 7 ELEMENT 2: MEASURABLE PUPIL OUTCOMES and 66 ELEMENT 3: METHOD BY WHICH PUPIL PROGRESS TOWARD OUTCOMES WILL BE MEASURED ELEMENT 4: GOVERNANCE 85 ELEMENT 5: EMPLOYEE QUALIFICATIONS 101 ELEMENT 6: HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES 110 ELEMENT 7: MEANS TO ACHIEVE RACIAL AND ETHNIC BALANCE 112 ELEMENT 8: ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS 116 ELEMENT 9: ANNUAL FINANCIAL AUDITS 119 ELEMENT 10: SUSPENSION AND EXPULSION PROCEDURES 121 ELEMENT 11: EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SYSTEMS 134 ELEMENT 12: PUBLIC SCHOOL ATTENDANCE ALTERNATIVES 135 ELEMENT 13: RIGHTS OF DISTRICT EMPLOYEES 136 ELEMENT 14: MANDATORY DISPUTE RESOLUTION 137 ELEMENT 15: EXCLUSIVE PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYER 139 ELEMENT 16: CHARTER SCHOOL CLOSURE PROCEDURES 140 ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS 147 APPENDIX FINANCIAL PLAN 154 COURT-ORDERED INTEGRATION PLAN 159 ATTENDANCE ACCOUNTING 161 SERVICES PROVIDED BY GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 162 FUNDING MODEL – DIRECTLY FUNDED 166 DISSEMINATION OF PRACTICE 167 TEACHER’S UNION CONTRACT 168 ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION & BYLAWS OF GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS 169 DISCIPLINE REVIEW PANEL – EXPULSION HEARING SCRIPT 170 PARENT STUDENT HANDBOOK 171 Ánimo Pat Brown Charter High School Renewal Petition 2 GREEN DOT PUBLIC SCHOOLS – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Strategy for Transforming Los Angeles Secondary Public Education Green Dot Public Schools (“Green Dot”), a non-profit charter management organization, is leading the charge to transform public education in Los Angeles and beyond so that all children receive the education they need to be successful in college, leadership and life.
    [Show full text]