DOCSLIB.ORG

Ieee Reference Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ieee Reference Guide IEEE REFERENCE GUIDE IEEE Publishing Operations 445 Hoes Lane Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA V 01.29.2021 © 2020 IEEE Table of Contents I. Citing References ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 A. References in Text ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 B. References Within a Reference ..................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Style ................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Books ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Book .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Books, Monographs (Online) ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Book Translated ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 Book With Chapter Title ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Book With Editor(s) ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Book With Series Title, Volume Title, and Edition ...................................................................................................... 5 B. Conferences and Conference Proceedings .................................................................................................................... 5 Conference Paper (Paper Presented at a Conference) ................................................................................................... 5 Conference Proceedings in Print (Paper Presented at a Conference) ............................................................................ 6 Conference Proceedings With DOI ............................................................................................................................... 6 Conference Proceedings With Editors .......................................................................................................................... 7 Conference Proceedings With Location ........................................................................................................................ 7 Conference Proceedings With Series Title, Volume Title, and Edition ........................................................................ 7 Conference Paper Online .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Conference Proceedings Online .................................................................................................................................... 7 C. Course ........................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Coursepack.................................................................................................................................................................... 8 D. Datasets ......................................................................................................................................................................... 8 E. Handbooks .................................................................................................................................................................. 10 F. Lectures ...................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Lecture Notes .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 Lecture Online ............................................................................................................................................................ 10 G. Legal Citations ............................................................................................................................................................ 10 H. Manuals ...................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Manual (Print) ............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Manual (Online) .......................................................................................................................................................... 11 I. Online Video (e.g., YouTube) .................................................................................................................................... 11 J. Patent .......................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Patent Online ............................................................................................................................................................... 12 K. Periodicals................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Periodicals ................................................................................................................................................................... 12 Periodical With Article ID .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Periodical With DOI ................................................................................................................................................... 14 Periodical in Early Access .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Periodical in Other Language...................................................................................................................................... 14 Periodicals Online ....................................................................................................................................................... 14 Virtual Journal ............................................................................................................................................................ 15 L. Reports ........................................................................................................................................................................ 15 Report Online .............................................................................................................................................................. 15 M. Software ...................................................................................................................................................................... 16 N. Standards..................................................................................................................................................................... 17 Standard Online .......................................................................................................................................................... 17 O. Theses (B.S., M.S.) and Dissertations (Ph.D.) ............................................................................................................ 18 Thesis Online .............................................................................................................................................................. 18 P. U.S. Government Documents ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Government Online ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Q. Unpublished ................................................................................................................................................................ 19 R. Websites ...................................................................................................................................................................... 19 III. Notes about Online References ...................................................................................................................................... 20 IV.Useful Abbreviations in references ................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sciencedirect Empowering Researchers at Every Step
    ScienceDirect Empowering researchers at every step Training ScienceDirect for Institut Teknologi Bandung By Ujang Sanusi Customer Consultant ELSEVIER INDONESIA | 2 Elsevier is a world-leading Science, Health & Technology Information Provider CONTENT PROVISION ‘E’ CONTENT PROVISION RESEARCH MGMT SEARCH & DISCOVERY /PROMOTION TOOLS Niels Louis Alexander Albert George F. John C. Roger D. Craig C Mello Bohr Physics Pasteur Fleming Einstein Smoot Mather Kornberg Medicine (Chemistry) Medicine Physics Physics Physics Chemistry 2 | 3 Elsevier is engaging across the research workflow ScienceDirect – Extensive Multi-disciplinary Full-Text Database ScienceDirect is the largest online journal platform in the world with more than 2,500 journals in 24 subject areas owned and published by Elsevier and more than 33,000 eBooks. • Publishes over 25% of the world’s full-text scientific journals with several high- profile journal titles such as Cell, The Lancet and Tetrahedron • Over 13,859,000 articles are available online • It is also the most referenced journal platform in the world with an average of 25% citations coming from journals on ScienceDirect • Over 250,000 articles on ScienceDirect are open access Elsevier is the top scientific content provider of vital interdisciplinary information essential across industries and disciplines Scientific Research Articles Published Multi-disciplinary content Env Earth SciencesSciences #1 Global Provider ELS Life Sciences* 25% Soc Sciences Publish 25% of world’s journal articles Math & 2,500 active journals Comp
    [Show full text]
  • The Etienne Gilson Series 21
    The Etienne Gilson Series 21 Remapping Scholasticism by MARCIA L. COLISH 3 March 2000 Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies This lecture and its publication was made possible through the generous bequest of the late Charles J. Sullivan (1914-1999) Note: the author may be contacted at: Department of History Oberlin College Oberlin OH USA 44074 ISSN 0-708-319X ISBN 0-88844-721-3 © 2000 by Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies 59 Queen’s Park Crescent East Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 2C4 Printed in Canada nce upon a time there were two competing story-lines for medieval intellectual history, each writing a major role for scholasticism into its script. Although these story-lines were O created independently and reflected different concerns, they sometimes overlapped and gave each other aid and comfort. Both exerted considerable influence on the way historians of medieval speculative thought conceptualized their subject in the first half of the twentieth cen- tury. Both versions of the map drawn by these two sets of cartographers illustrated what Wallace K. Ferguson later described as “the revolt of the medievalists.”1 One was confined largely to the academy and appealed to a wide variety of medievalists, while the other had a somewhat narrower draw and reflected political and confessional, as well as academic, concerns. The first was the anti-Burckhardtian effort to push Renaissance humanism, understood as combining a knowledge and love of the classics with “the discovery of the world and of man,” back into the Middle Ages. The second was inspired by the neo-Thomist revival launched by Pope Leo XIII, and was inhabited almost exclusively by Roman Catholic scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Sciencedirect ® Sciencedirect Books: High Impact, Relevant Content
    ScienceDirect ® ScienceDirect Books: High impact, relevant content These days, a world of information is at our fingertips. Simple online searches return millions of pages that claim to provide expert, timely information. But we’ve all had the experience of wondering if the information is trustworthy, accurate and the best to address our needs. Even casual web searchers are left wondering how to decipher the irrelevant information that fills online search result pages, so what’s a serious researcher to do in a world of overwhelming content and underwhelming relevancy? Elsevier offers greater clarity and insights for researchers by putting their needs first. ScienceDirect: A maximum impact, trusted research solution that delivers ScienceDirect, Elsevier’s leading online full-text information solution, is more than just a research destination for scientists; it’s a continuously evolving, dynamic repository that is constantly updated with the very latest research data available on a variety of subjects. Using the latest technology, the platform provides users with the answers they need, when they need them across a broad range of topics in science, technology and health, helping users attain a greater depth of information than other research solutions provide. Our data driven approach A user focused perspective based on the workflow and understanding the needs of researchers to build our publishing strategy Elsevier offers greater clarity and insights for researchers decisions. By providing data and analysis of their by putting their needs first. A wide range of relevant institution’s usage behavior on ScienceDirect to identify content combined with cutting-edge technology on the content gaps, a clear picture of in-demand content ScienceDirect platform provides quick, easily accessible emerges.
    [Show full text]
  • Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Papers, 1646-1716
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt2779p48t No online items Finding Aid for the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Papers, 1646-1716 Processed by David MacGill; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé © 2003 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid for the Gottfried 503 1 Wilhelm Leibniz Papers, 1646-1716 Finding Aid for the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Papers, 1646-1716 Collection number: 503 UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections Manuscripts Division Los Angeles, CA Processed by: David MacGill, November 1992 Encoded by: Caroline Cubé Online finding aid edited by: Josh Fiala, October 2003 © 2003 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Papers, Date (inclusive): 1646-1716 Collection number: 503 Creator: Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm, Freiherr von, 1646-1716 Extent: 6 oversize boxes Repository: University of California, Los Angeles. Library. Dept. of Special Collections. Los Angeles, California 90095-1575 Abstract: Leibniz (1646-1716) was a philosopher, mathematician, and political advisor. He invented differential and integral calculus. His major writings include New physical hypothesis (1671), Discourse on metaphysics (1686), On the ultimate origin of things (1697), and On nature itself (1698). The collection consists of 35 reels of positive microfilm of more than 100,000 handwritten pages of manuscripts and letters. Physical location: Stored off-site at SRLF. Advance notice is required for access to the collection. Please contact the UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections Reference Desk for paging information. Language: English. Restrictions on Use and Reproduction Property rights to the physical object belong to the UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Frege and the Logic of Sense and Reference
    FREGE AND THE LOGIC OF SENSE AND REFERENCE Kevin C. Klement Routledge New York & London Published in 2002 by Routledge 29 West 35th Street New York, NY 10001 Published in Great Britain by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane London EC4P 4EE Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2002 by Kevin C. Klement All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any infomration storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Klement, Kevin C., 1974– Frege and the logic of sense and reference / by Kevin Klement. p. cm — (Studies in philosophy) Includes bibliographical references and index ISBN 0-415-93790-6 1. Frege, Gottlob, 1848–1925. 2. Sense (Philosophy) 3. Reference (Philosophy) I. Title II. Studies in philosophy (New York, N. Y.) B3245.F24 K54 2001 12'.68'092—dc21 2001048169 Contents Page Preface ix Abbreviations xiii 1. The Need for a Logical Calculus for the Theory of Sinn and Bedeutung 3 Introduction 3 Frege’s Project: Logicism and the Notion of Begriffsschrift 4 The Theory of Sinn and Bedeutung 8 The Limitations of the Begriffsschrift 14 Filling the Gap 21 2. The Logic of the Grundgesetze 25 Logical Language and the Content of Logic 25 Functionality and Predication 28 Quantifiers and Gothic Letters 32 Roman Letters: An Alternative Notation for Generality 38 Value-Ranges and Extensions of Concepts 42 The Syntactic Rules of the Begriffsschrift 44 The Axiomatization of Frege’s System 49 Responses to the Paradox 56 v vi Contents 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Presupposition Failure and Intended Pronominal Reference: Person Is Not So Different from Gender After All* Isabelle Charnavel Harvard University
    Presupposition failure and intended pronominal reference: Person is not so different from gender after all* Isabelle Charnavel Harvard University Abstract This paper aims to show that (one of) the main argument(s) against the presuppositional account of person is not compelling if one makes appropriate assumptions about how the context fixes the assignment. It has been argued that unlike gender features, person features of free pronouns cannot yield presupposition failure (but only falsity) when they are not verified by the referent. The argument is however flawed because the way the referent is assigned is not made clear. If it is assumed to be the individual that the audience can recognize as the referent intended by the speaker, the argument is reversed. Keywords Person, gender, presupposition, assignment, reference, indexicals 1 Introduction Since Cooper (1983), gender features on pronouns are standardly analyzed as presuppositions (Heim and Kratzer 1998, Sauerland 2003, Heim 2008, Percus 2011, i.a.). Cooper’s analysis of gender features has not only been extended to number, but also to person features (Heim and Kratzer 1998, Schlenker 1999, 2003, Sauerland 2008, Heim 2008, i.a.), thus replacing the more traditional indexical analysis of first and second person pronouns (Kaplan 1977 and descendants of it). All pronouns are thereby interpreted as variables, and all phi-features are assigned uniform interpretive functions, that is, they introduce presuppositions that restrict of the value of the variables. However, empirical arguments have recently been provided that cast doubt on the presuppositional nature of person features (Stokke 2010, Sudo 2012, i.a.). In particular, it has been claimed that when the person information is not verified by the referent, the use of a first/second person pronoun does not give rise to a feeling of presupposition failure, as is the case when the gender information does not match the referent’s gender: a person mismatch, unlike a gender mismatch, yields a plain judgment of falsity.
    [Show full text]
  • Bearers of Truth and the Unsaid
    1 Bearers of Truth and the Unsaid Stephen Barker (University of Nottingham) Draft (Forthcoming in Making Semantics Pragmatic (ed) K. Turner. (CUP). The standard view about the bearers of truth–the entities that are the ultimate objects of predication of truth or falsity–is that they are propositions or sentences semantically correlated with propositions. Propositions are meant to be the contents of assertions, objects of thought or judgement, and so are ontologically distinct from assertions or acts of thought or judgement. So understood propositions are meant to be things like possible states of affairs or sets of possible worlds–entities that are clearly not acts of judgement. Let us say that a sentence S encodes a proposition «P» when linguistic rules (plus context) correlate «P» with S in a manner that does not depend upon whether S is asserted or appears embedded in a logical compound. The orthodox conception of truth-bearers then can be expressed in two forms: TB1 : The primary truth-bearers are propositions. TB2 : The primary truth-bearers are sentences that encode a proposition «P». I use the term primary truth-bearers , since orthodoxy allows that assertions or judgements, etc, can be truth-bearers, it is just that they are derivatively so; they being truth-apt depends on other things being truth-apt. Some orthodox theorists prefer TB1 –Stalnaker (1972)– some prefer TB2 –Richard (1990). We need not concern ourselves with the reasons for their preferences here. Rather, our concern shall be this: why accept orthodoxy at all in either form: TB1 or TB2 ? There is without doubt a strong general reason to accept the propositional view.
    [Show full text]
  • Sciencedirect's Advanced Recommender a Fruitful Academic—Industrial Partnership
    ScienceDirect's Advanced Recommender a Fruitful Academic—Industrial Partnership Martin Rajman Craig Scott EPFL Elsevier [email protected] [email protected] 1 Academic-Industrial partnership Martin Rajman • Executive Director of Nano-Tera.ch, a large Swiss Research Program funding collaborative multi- disciplinary projects for the engineering of complex systems in Health and the Environment. • Senior researcher at EPF Lausanne, Switzerland (EPFL). His research interests include Artificial Intelligence, Computational Linguistics and Data- driven Probabilistic Machine Learning. • Active in various large scale industry-research collaborations with majors economic players. EPFL • EPFL is one of the two Swiss Federal Institutes of Technology and is located in Lausanne, Switzerland. It is considered to be among the worlds most prestigious universities in technology. 2 Academic-Industrial partnership Craig Scott • Senior Product Manager, Academic & Government Research Markets (ScienceDirect, Scopus, Scirus) • Amsterdam, Netherlands • Working on ‘big data’ experiments, A/B testing, search technology • Science Technology & Medical division of Reed Elsevier Elsevier Customers in >180 countries (1/3 North America, 1/3 Europe, 1/3 RoW) Serving >30 million scientists, students, health and information professionals 3 General Context • Every day Elsevier records millions of data points on document downloads (or views) on about 12 million scientific publications • This represents extremely valuable information about the involved scientific community(ies)
    [Show full text]
  • Elsevier @Thebritishlibrary Sciencedirect Scopus
    The Business of E-Resources Publishing Michaela Kurschildgen, Customer Consultant Elsevier Hilton Leeds City, 7 June 2017 Looking at today 1. A short history of publishing 2. Who is Elsevier 3. Technological and Content Innovation 4. Launching a new Journal 5. Editorial & Marketing Policies 6. Editorial & Peer Review Process 7. The Economics of Publishing 8. Pricing Models 9. Delivering Electronic Content 10. Working with Consortia 11. Open Access 1. A short history of publishing | 4 Origins of Scholarly Publishing 1439 Henry 1580 March 6,1665 Gutenberg Oldenburg Founding of the Philosophical and (1618- 1677) House of Elzevir Transactions of moveable the Royal Society Founding Editor type and Commercial Publisher of the First true scholarly first scientific journal journal . Ability to create multiply, bulk copies of literature . Religious & liturgical manuscripts Secretay of RS 1663 sent manuscripts to experts ->peer review In Context: Scholarly Publishing Today Scientific,Technical and Medical communities around the world are united through STM Publishing Highly competitive industry Peer Reviewed Articles per Peer Reviewed Journals Year 19% 26% 74% 81% Other STM publishers Elsevier Other STM publishers Elsevier 5 Examples of our 3,800+ journal titles Role of scientific publications Journal publishing has thrived for over 340 years but the fundamental role of Publishers remains unchanged Registration Timestamp: person and time of any new matter Certification Peer review – stamp of approval by publisher, quality guarantee Dissemination Medium to share findings Elzevirianas circa 1629 Preservation First scientific journals published in 1665 Preserve and archive records of science Oldenburg saw four roles that the journal served for the Society 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Elsevier, Bepress, and a Glimpse at the Future of Scholarly Communication Christine L Ferguson, Murray State University
    Murray State University From the SelectedWorks of Cris Ferguson 2018 Elsevier, bepress, and a Glimpse at the Future of Scholarly Communication Christine L Ferguson, Murray State University Available at: https://works.bepress.com/christine-l-ferguson/45/ Balance Point Elsevier, bepress, and a Glimpse at the Future of Scholarly Communication Cris Ferguson, Column Editor Director of Technical Services, Waterfield Library, Murray State University, Murray, KY 42071; phone: 270-809-5607; email: [email protected]; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000- 0001-8410-6010 Keywords Elsevier; bepress; open access; Penn Libraries; Digital Commons; scholarly communications Abstract The acquisition of bepress by Elsevier in August 2017, while unpopular among many librarians, provides both companies opportunities for expansion and growth. This Balance Point column outlines some of the benefits to both companies and the reaction by the library community. Also addressed is the announcement by the Penn Libraries that they are searching for a new open source repository potentially to replace bepress’s Digital Commons. The column concludes with some discussion of Elsevier’s relationship with open access content and the impact of the acquisition on the scholarly communications infrastructure. On August 2, 2017, Elsevier announced its acquisition of bepress, the provider of the Digital Commons institutional repository platform. Digital Commons “allows institutions to collect, organize, preserve and disseminate their intellectual output, including preprints, working papers, journals or specific articles, dissertations, theses, conference proceedings and a wide variety of other data” (Elsevier, August 2, 2017). bepress’s other major service, the Experts Gallery Suite, focuses on showcasing the expertise and scholarship of faculty. At the time Elsevier acquired the company, bepress had more than 500 customers using Digital Commons, and over 100 institutions using the Experts Gallery Suite.
    [Show full text]
  • Sciencedirect.Com Sciencedirect
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Journal of Pragmatics 109 (2017) 47--63 www.elsevier.com/locate/pragma Sequence recompletion: A practice for managing lapses in conversation Elliott M. Hoey * Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Netherlands Received 25 August 2016; received in revised form 8 December 2016; accepted 9 December 2016 Abstract Conversational interaction occasionally lapses as topics become exhausted or as participants are left with no obvious thing to talk about next. In this article I look at episodes of ordinary conversation to examine how participants resolve issues of speakership and sequentiality in lapse environments. In particular, I examine one recurrent phenomenon---sequence recompletion---whereby participants bring to completion a sequence of talk that was already treated as complete. Using conversation analysis, I describe four methods for sequence recompletion: turn-exiting,[4_TD$IF] action redoings, delayed replies, and post-sequence transitions. With this practice, participants use verbal and vocal resources to locally manage their participation framework when ending one course of action and potentially starting up a new one. © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords:[5_TD$IF] Conversation analysis; Lapses; Sequence organization; Turn-taking; Silence 1. Introduction It is a regular occurrence in conversational interaction for silence to emerge at the end of a sequence of talk, and then for someone to end that silence with some utterance that neither forwards the topic nor implicates some next action. Take for example Extract 1, which begins with Hannah informing Molly about their university's interlibrary loan program (a more technical analysis is given in Section 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Download the QUOSA Fact Sheet
    Fact Sheet Helping life science companies overcome information management issues The four pillars of QUOSA Who QUOSA supports • Automated collection and deduplication of full-text QUOSA is designed to facilitate information literature and other documents management for life sciences teams, including: • Easy organization of documents in a centralized, • Medical and regulatory affairs teams needing to rapidly cloud-based repository respond to queries • Searching of external sources and the QUOSA library • Research and discovery teams working with a large, • Support for copyright compliant sharing of resources shared knowledge base with the right teams • Drug and device safety teams focused Consolidating and standardizing literature locations and tools helps life sciences companies with research efficiency, saves on costs and streamlines critical regulatory workflows. It also supports compliant literature storage and sharing. QUOSA is a complete online information management solution designed for life sciences companies. It centralizes the process of collecting and sharing scientific information to ensure efficient and compliant use of the knowledge base. What does QUOSA do? Who is QUOSA for? QUOSA consolidates your external and internal literature QUOSA is specifically developed for life sciences companies resources into a single, centralized, scalable online library. in consultation with industry information professionals. It provides all the tools needed for efficiently organizing, This customizable end-to-end solution can meet your most searching, sharing and annotating information. demanding scientific literature management needs without You can use QUOSA to search other sources, including changing your existing workflows. Embase®, Scopus® and PubMed®, and retrieve references from them. You can also set email alerts to let you know about new Why choose QUOSA? documents that are relevant to your searches in those databases.
    [Show full text]