DOCSLIB.ORG

A Handbook of Patrology by the Rev

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Handbook of Patrology by the Rev A HANDBOOK OF PATROLOGY BY THE REV. J. TIXERONT, D.D. AUTHORIZED TRANSLATION, BASED UPON THE FOURTH FRENCH EDITION SECOND EDITION B. HERDER BOOK CO. 17 SOUTH BROADWAY, ST. LOUIS, MO. AND 68, GREAT RUSSELL ST., LONDON, W. C. 1923 Source Text: https://archive.org/stream/ahandbookofpatro00tixeuoft/ahandbookofpatro00tixeuoft_djvu.txt For citation purposes, the original page numbers are [bracketed] intratext. NIHIL OBSTAT Sti. Ludovici, die 15. Sept. 1920 F. G. Holweck, Censor Librorum IMPRIMATUR Sti. Ludovici, die 16. Sept. 1920 Joannes J. Glennon, Archiepiscopus Sti. Ludovici Copyright, 1920 by Joseph Gummersbach All rights reserved Printed in U. S. A. VAIL-BALLOU COMPANY Contents PRINCIPAL ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................................... 7 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 1. Preliminary Remarks – The Purpose of this Book ...........................................................................1 2. Main Works on Patrology and on the History of Ancient Christian Literature................................ 2 3. Principal Patrological Collections....................................................................................................3 FIRST PERIOD .............................................................................................................................. 6 BEGINNING AND GROWTH OF EARLY CHRISTIAN LITERATURE THE FATHERS OF THE FIRST THREE CENTURIES................................................................................................ 6 Section I ...................................................................................................................................... 6 THE APOSTOLIC FATHERS................................................................................................... 6 1. St. Clement.......................................................................................................................................6 2. St. Ignatius........................................................................................................................................8 3. St. Polycarp and the Acts of His Martydom...................................................................................10 4. Pseudo-Barnabas ............................................................................................................................ 11 5. The doctrine of the Twelve Apostles.............................................................................................. 11 6. The Homily Called Second Epistle of St. Clement ........................................................................12 7. The Shepherd of Hermas................................................................................................................13 8. Papias and the Presbyters ...............................................................................................................16 9. The Apostles' Creed ....................................................................................................................... 16 Section II................................................................................................................................... 18 THE APOLOGISTS OF THE SECOND CENTURY ............................................................. 18 General Survey...................................................................................................................................18 1. Lost Apologies — Aristides of Athens .......................................................................................... 19 2. St. Justin Martyr ............................................................................................................................. 20 3. Tatian..............................................................................................................................................23 4. Athenagoras....................................................................................................................................25 5. Theophilus of Antioch....................................................................................................................26 6. The Letter to Diognetus..................................................................................................................27 7. Hermias ..........................................................................................................................................27 8. Minucius Felix................................................................................................................................ 28 Section III ................................................................................................................................. 30 THE HERETICAL AND APOCRYPHAL LITERATURE OF THE SECOND CENTURY 30 1. Judeo-Christian Literature..............................................................................................................30 2. Gnostic Literature........................................................................................................................... 31 3. Montanistic Literature ....................................................................................................................35 4. Apocryphal Literature — Christian Apocrypha of the Old Testament ..........................................35 5. The Apocrypha of the New Testament — The Gospels.................................................................36 6. Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles....................................................................................................39 7. Apocryphal Epistles ....................................................................................................................... 41 8. Apocryphal Apocalypses................................................................................................................42 Section IV ................................................................................................................................. 43 THE OPPONENTS OF HERESY IN THE SECOND CENTURY......................................... 43 1. The Anti-Gnostic Writers — Hegesippus ......................................................................................43 2. St. Irenaeus.....................................................................................................................................44 3. Anti-Montanistic and Other Writers............................................................................................... 46 Section V................................................................................................................................... 48 THE ORIENTAL WRITERS OF THE THIRD CENTURY ................................................... 48 1. Alexandrians and Egyptians — Clement ....................................................................................... 48 2. Origen.............................................................................................................................................51 3. Dionysius of Alexandria and Other Less Important Authors......................................................... 55 4. Syro-Palestinians — Julius Africanus — Pamphilus and Less Important Authors........................ 57 5. Anonymous and Disciplinary Writings.......................................................................................... 58 6. Writers of Asia Minor — St. Gregory Thaumaturgus — Methodius.............................................59 Section VI ................................................................................................................................. 62 WESTERN WRITERS OF THE THIRD CENTURY............................................................. 62 1. African Writers — Tertullian.........................................................................................................62 2. St. Cyprian......................................................................................................................................67 3. Commodianus and Anonymous Contemporary Writers ................................................................ 69 4. Arnobius and Lactantius.................................................................................................................70 5. Roman Writers — St. Hippolytus ..................................................................................................72 6. Novatian and the Popes of the Third Century ................................................................................74 7. Writers of Gaul and Pannonia — Victorinus of Pettau ..................................................................75 APPENDIX TO PART I........................................................................................................... 77 The Acts of the Martyrs......................................................................................................................77 SECOND PERIOD................................................................................................................... 79 THE GOLDEN AGE OF PATRISTIC LITERATURE (313-461) .......................................... 79 Section I .................................................................................................................................... 80 GREEK HETERODOX LITERATURE.................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Logos-Sarx Christology and the Sixth-Century Miaenergism
    VOX PATRUM 37 (2017) t. 67 Oleksandr KASHCHUK* LOGOS-SARX CHRISTOLOGY AND THE SIXTH-CENTURY MIAENERGISM From the early years of Christian theology to the Council of Ephesus (431) the main task for Christology was to affirm the reality of both divinity and humanity in the person of Christ. Each of the great theological centers, such as Antioch and Alexandria, was to emphasize a different aspect of Christology in defense of orthodoxy. After the Council of Nicaea (325) the adherents of consubstantial (ÐmooÚsioj) saw difficulty in defining the reality of Christ’s humanity. This question arose in the period between Nicaea and Ephesus (325- 431). Bishops and theologians stressed the unity of subject of Christ and the truth of his humanity. Although during the time from Ephesus to Chalcedon (431-451) the fullness of divinity and humanity were acknowledged by majo- rity, there arose the debate concerning the relationship between the human and divine elements within Christ on the one hand and relationship between these elements on the other. The debate passed into the question concerning the ex- pression of Christ’s two natures coexisting in one person. So the main focus of the Christological discussion in the sixth century shifted from the problem of unity and interrelation between elements in Christ to the expression of unity through activity and its consequences for the fullness of Christ’s humanity. The issue of Christ’s operation and will thus became the most prevalent ques- tions in Christology from the late sixth to the early seventh centuries. At that time there arose the Miaenergist debate concerning whether Christ had a whol- ly human as well as a wholly divine operation and volition.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Council of Constantinople : 869-870
    Fourth Council of Constantinople : 869-870 CONTENTS ● Definition ● Canons INTRODUCTION This council, designated as the eighth ecumenical council by western canonists, is not found in any canonical collections of the Byzantines; its acts and canons are completely ignored by them. Modern scholars have shown that it was included in the list of ecumenical councils only later, that is, after the eleventh century. We have decided to include the council, for the sake of historical completeness. Emperor Basil I and the patriarch Ignatius, after being restored to his see of Constantinople, asked Pope Nicholas I to call a council to decide about the bishops and priests who had been ordained by Photius. It was held at Constantinople after the arrival of legates from Pope Hadrian II, who had meanwhile succeeded Nicholas. These legates were Donatus, Stephen and Marinus and they presided at the council. It began in the cathedral of Hagia Sophia on 5 October 869. The tenth and last session was held on 28 February 870, when 27 canons were read out and approved by the council. All who were willing to sign the Liber satisfactionis, which had been sent by Pope Hadrian II, were admitted to the council. The account made by Anastasius contains the authentic list of those who signed the acts of the council. Emperor Basil I and his sons, Constantine and Leo, signed the acts after the patriarchs and in the same year they promulgated the council's decisions, after drawing up a decree for this purpose. As regards the canonical authority of these deliberations, various facts regarding the council held in the cathedral of Hagia Sophia in November 879, so that Photius might be restored to the see of Constantinople, should be remembered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transfiguration in the Theology of Gregory Palamas And
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 2015 Deus in se et Deus pro nobis: The rT ansfiguration in the Theology of Gregory Palamas and Its Importance for Catholic Theology Cory Hayes Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Hayes, C. (2015). Deus in se et Deus pro nobis: The rT ansfiguration in the Theology of Gregory Palamas and Its Importance for Catholic Theology (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/640 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEUS IN SE ET DEUS PRO NOBIS: THE TRANSFIGURATION IN THE THEOLOGY OF GREGORY PALAMAS AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR CATHOLIC THEOLOGY A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Cory J. Hayes May 2015 Copyright by Cory J. Hayes 2015 DEUS IN SE ET DEUS PRO NOBIS: THE TRANSFIGURATION IN THE THEOLOGY OF GREGORY PALAMAS AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR CATHOLIC THEOLOGY By Cory J. Hayes Approved March 31, 2015 _______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Bogdan Bucur Dr. Radu Bordeianu Associate Professor of Theology Associate Professor of Theology (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) _______________________________ Dr. Christiaan Kappes Professor of Liturgy and Patristics Saints Cyril and Methodius Byzantine Catholic Seminary (Committee Member) ________________________________ ______________________________ Dr. James Swindal Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Student Journal for the Study of the Ancient World
    A Student Journal for the Study of the Ancient World Volume 20, Number 1 Summer 2021 Brigham Young University Provo, Utah A Student Journal for the Study of the Ancient World Brigham Young University Editors Jeremy Madsen Helaman Bennion Head of Faculty Review Board David Seely ANES Department Chair Cecilia Peek August 2021 issn: 1540-8787 Studia Antiqua is an annual student journal dedicated to publishing the research of graduate and undergraduate students from all disciplines of ancient studies. The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of Brigham Young University or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The continued publication of Studia Antiqua is made possible through financial contributions by Ancient Near Eastern Studies. Additional contributions were made to this volume by Classics and the Religious Studies Center. Studia Antiqua accepts manuscripts for publication year-round. Manuscripts should be sent to [email protected] and should include a title page with the author’s name, major, and year in school. For submission guidelines, please visit studiaantiqua.byu.edu. Contents Volume 20, Number 1 Summer 2021 Abbreviations .......................................................................................... iv Editor’s Preface ...................................................................................... vi Alexandra Carlile Migraines, Men, and Mythology: Gendered Imagery in the Birth of Athena ............................................................. 1 Alexander Christensen Mendacia in Minucius Felix: The Charged Rhetoric of a Latin Apologist................................................................. 9 Abigail Booth Sacred Writing and Magic Metal: The High Priest’s Holy Crown as a Protective Amulet ................................................... 23 Elliotte Thurtle Hedgehogs and Hyenas: Peculiar Animals of Ancient Egypt ......... 38 Megan Mayfield The Winged Victory: Nike in Ancient Greece .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Edessa and the Shroud: History Concealed by the Discipline of the Secret
    ANCIENT EDESSA AND THE SHROUD: HISTORY CONCEALED BY THE DISCIPLINE OF THE SECRET By Jack Markwardt THE IMAGE OF ANTIOCH Modern sindonology, drawing substantially upon the Mandylion Theory,1 appears to have established, within a reasonable degree of certainty, a substantial portion of the medieval biography of the Turin Shroud,2 commencing with its historical debut, between 5443 and 569,4 as the Image of Edessa; however, the relic’s whereabouts during the Missing Ancient Centuries, the half-millennium spanning its disappearance from Christ’s tomb to its reappearance in sixth-century Edessa, remain the subject of debate. The author’s 1999 hypothesis,5 that the Shroud was taken, in apostolic times,6 to the Syrian city of Antioch, concealed and lost in 362,7 rediscovered in ca. 530,8 and conveyed to Edessa9 when Antioch was destroyed in 540,10 is supported by historical records which evidence the presence of a Christ-icon in both fourth-century Syria and sixth-century Antioch.11 In the fourth century, Athanasius, the Bishop of Alexandria (ca. 328-373), affirmed that a sacred Christ-icon,12 traceable to Jerusalem and the year 68, was then present in Syria:13 …but two years before Titus and Vespasian sacked the city, the faithful and disciples of Christ were warned by the Holy Spirit to depart from the city and go to the kingdom of King Agrippa, because at that time Agrippa was a Roman ally. Leaving the city, they went to his regions and carried everything relating to our faith. At that time even the icon with certain other ecclesiastical objects were moved and they today still remain in Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Count of Saint-Gilles and the Saints of the Apocalypse
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 8-2015 The ounC t of Saint-Gilles and the Saints of the Apocalypse: Occitanian Piety and Culture in the Time of the First Crusade Thomas Whitney Lecaque University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Recommended Citation Lecaque, Thomas Whitney, "The ounC t of Saint-Gilles and the Saints of the Apocalypse: Occitanian Piety and Culture in the Time of the First Crusade. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2015. http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3434 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Thomas Whitney Lecaque entitled "The ounC t of Saint-Gilles and the Saints of the Apocalypse: Occitanian Piety and Culture in the Time of the First Crusade." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Jay Rubenstein, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Thomas Burman, Jacob Latham, Rachel Golden Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) The Count of Saint-Gilles and the Saints of the Apocalypse: Occitanian Piety and Culture in the Time of the First Crusade A Dissertation Presented for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Thomas Whitney Lecaque August 2015 ii Copyright © 2015 by Thomas Whitney Lecaque All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Justin Martyr, Irenaeus of Lyons, and Cyprian of Carthage on Suffering: A
    LIBERTY UNIVERSITY JUSTIN MARTYR, IRENAEUS OF LYONS, AND CYPRIAN OF CARTHAGE ON SUFFERING: A COMPARATIVE AND CRITICAL STUDY OF THEIR WORKS THAT CONCERN THE APOLOGETIC USES OF SUFFERING IN EARLY CHRISTIANITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE RAWLINGS SCHOOL OF DIVINITY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THEOLOGY AND APOLOGETICS BY AARON GLENN KILBOURN LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA AUGUST 2017 Copyright © 2017 by Aaron Glenn Kilbourn All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL SHEET JUSTIN MARTYR, IRENAEUS OF LYONS, AND CYPRIAN OF CARTHAGE ON SUFFERING: A COMPARATIVE AND CRITICAL STUDY OF THEIR WORKS THA CONCERN THE APOLOGETIC USES OF SUFFERING IN EARLY CHRISTIANITY Aaron Glenn Kilbourn Read and approved by: Chairperson: _____________________________ Reader: _____________________________ Reader: _____________________________ Date: _____________________________ iii To my wife, Michelle, my children, Aubrey and Zack, as well as the congregation of First Baptist Church of Parker, SD. I thank our God that by His grace, your love, faithfulness, and prayers have all helped sustain each of my efforts for His glory. iv CONTENTS Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………………ix Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………….x CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………..1 Personal Interest………………………………………………………………………8 The Need for the Study……………………………………………………………….9 Methodological Design……………………………………………………………….10 Limitations……………………………………………………………………………12 CHAPTER 2: THE CONCEPT OF SUFFERING IN THE BIBLE AND EARLY APOLOGISTS........................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • 2 List of Abbreviations Used in the Chapter PH Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes M Adversus Mathematicos BAV Biblioteca Apostolica Vatican
    2 List of abbreviations used in the chapter PH Pyrrhoniae Hypotyposes M Adversus Mathematicos BAV Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Roma BN Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris PG Patrologia Graeca etc. PL Patrologia Latina etc. TLG Thesaurus Linguae Graecae 2 3 The Rediscovery and Posthumous Influence of Scepticism Luciano Floridi Introduction The history of the transmission, recovery and posthumous influence of ancient scepticism is a fascinating chapter in the history of ideas. An extraordinary collection of philosophical texts and some of the most challenging arguments ever devised were first lost, then only partly recovered philologically, and finally rediscovered conceptually, leaving Cicero and Sextus Empiricus as the main champions of Academic and Pyrrhonian scepticism respectively. This chapter outlines what we know about this shipwreck and what was later savaged from it. It cannot provide many details, given its length. And, being a review, it does not try to solve the many puzzles and mysteries still unsolved. But, as an introduction, it does seek to give a general idea of what happened to ancient scepticism in the long span of time occurring between Augustin and Descartes. It is a dozen of centuries of Western philosophy, so a few generalizations, some schematism and a good degree of abstraction from specific information will be inevitable. The reader interested in pursuing further knowledge about the topic is invited to consult Schmitt [1972a], Floridi [2002] and Popkin [2003]. Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages Our story begins with a dramatic loss of memory, roughly in the fourth century. By the time Augustine was writing Contra Academicos, Academic scepticism, transmitted in Latin, had become the brand of scepticism known to philosophers and theologians, at the expense of Pyrrhonism in general and Sextus Empiricus’ Greek texts in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • 143-144 Jones.Indd
    CHRISTOPHER P. JONES CHRISTIANITY AT APOLLONIA OF PISIDIA? aus: Epigraphica Anatolica 42 (2009) 143–144 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn CHRISTIANITY AT APOLLONIA OF PISIDIA? The sum of epigraphic evidence for Christianity in the third century is very small, and therefore any addition to the known testimonies is sure to arouse interest. Under the title, “Apollonia: An Early Testimony for Christianity in Anatolia”, P. R. McKechnie has recently proposed that an inscription from Apollonia in Phrygia or Pisidia, just east of Apamea Cibotos, should be added to the dossier.1 In the pediment above the inscription is carved a cross with four arms of equal length within a circle. The text and a possible translation are as follows: Αὐρ. Ἀσκληπιάδης Ἀλεξάνδρου τοῦ καὶ Ἀρτέμωνος δʹ Ὀλυνπίχου καὶ Αὐρ. Κοσμία Ἀσκληπι<ά>δου βʹ Μεννέου τῷ ἰδίῳ ἀνδρί, καὶ Αὐρ. <Ἀρ>τεμωνὶς πατρὶ Ἀλεξάνδρῳ μνήμης χάριν. Aurelius Asclepiades, son of Alexander also known as Artemon, fourth of the name [i.e. son, grandson and great-grandson of Alexander, who was son] of Olympichos, and Aurelia Kos- mia, daughter of Asclepiades, second of the name [i.e. son of Asclepiades, son] of Menneas, for her own husband, and Aurelia Artemonis for her father Alexander, in his memory.2 The earliest ancestor named is therefore Olympichos, father of Alexander. The MAMA editors, W. H. Buckler, W. M. Calder and W. K. C. Guthrie, adduced other inscriptions of Apollonia probably referring to the same family, and assembled a stemma to take account of all the per- sons who could possibly be included in it.3 They did not, however, insist on its correctness, and in constructing it they made some arbitrary decisions about identities and interrelationships.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fathers in the English Reformation
    Durham E-Theses The study of the fathers in the Anglican tradition 16th-19th centuries Middleton, Thomas Arthur How to cite: Middleton, Thomas Arthur (1995) The study of the fathers in the Anglican tradition 16th-19th centuries, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/5328/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk ir-ji.r,;;s.;','is THE STUDY OF THE FATHERS IN THE ANGLICAN TRADITION iiiilli 16TH-19TH CENTURIES iliii ii^wiiiiiBiiiiiii! lililiiiiliiiiiln mom ARTHUR MIDDLETON The Study of the Fathers in The Anglican Tradition 16th-19th Centuries The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be pubhshed without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged. By The Revd. Thomas Arthur Middleton Rector of Boldon 1995 M.Litt., Thesis Presented to UieFaculty of Arts 1MAY 1996 University of Durham Department of Theology Acknowledgements The author expresses his thanks to the Diocese of Durham for the giving of a grant to enable this research to be done and submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Nisibis As the Background to the Life of Ephrem the Syrian
    Hugoye: Journal of Syriac Studies, Vol. 8, 179-235 © 2005 [2009] by Beth Mardutho: The Syriac Institute and Gorgias Press NISIBIS AS THE BACKGROUND TO THE LIFE OF EPHREM THE SYRIAN PAUL S. RUSSELL ST. JOSEPH OF ARIMATHEA ANGLICAN THEOLOGICAL COLLEGE ABSTRACT1 This paper is an attempt to collect together what is known about Nisibis before and during the life of Ephrem the Syrian (306-373). It is important to see him against the backdrop of the place that formed him rather than the place in which he spent the final years of his life, so it is to Nisibis that we should turn for insight into Ephrem’s basic thoughts and concerns. I hope that this information may stir readers to reflect on Ephrem as a child of his birthplace and to see him in a slightly different light than before. Even of Nisibis, which was clearly the central place in the eastern part of the Mesopotamian shelf, we have 1 I would like to thank the anonymous readers from Hugoye as well as Dr. Daniel Stoekl Ben Ezra of Hebrew University, Dr. David G. K. Taylor of Oxford University, Dr. James Russell of Harvard University, Adam Becker of New York University, Dr. Mark Dickens of Cambridge University, Dr. Edwin Yamauchi of Miami University of Ohio and Dr. Glen Bowersock of Princeton University for supplying me with information and suggestions that were helpful in filling in gaps and giving a clearer shape to this paper that had been electronically damaged as well as being incomplete. Please accept my apologies if this list is incomplete.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Summary of Observations, Data and Hypotheses
    TThhee SShhrroouudd ooff TTuurriinn A Critical Summary of Observations, Data and Hypotheses If the truth were a mere mathematical formula, in some sense it would impose itself by its own power. But if Truth is Love, it calls for faith, for the ‘yes’ of our hearts. Pope Benedict XVI Version 4.0 Copyright 2017, Turin Shroud Center of Colorado Preface The purpose of the Critical Summary is to provide a synthesis of the Turin Shroud Center of Colorado (TSC) thinking about the Shroud of Turin and to make that synthesis available to the serious inquirer. Our evaluation of scientific, medical forensic and historical hypotheses presented here is based on TSC’s tens of thousands of hours of internal research, the Shroud of Turin Research Project (STURP) data, and other published research. The Critical Summary synthesis is not itself intended to present new research findings. With the exception of our comments all information presented has been published elsewhere, and we have endeavored to provide references for all included data. We wish to gratefully acknowledge the contributions of several persons and organizations. First, we would like to acknowledge Dan Spicer, PhD in Physics, and Dave Fornof for their contributions in the construction of Version 1.0 of the Critical Summary. We are grateful to Mary Ann Siefker and Mary Snapp for proofreading efforts. The efforts of Shroud historian Jack Markwardt in reviewing and providing valuable comments for the Version 4.0 History Section are deeply appreciated. We also are very grateful to Barrie Schwortz (Shroud.com) and the STERA organization for their permission to include photographs from their database of STURP photographs.
    [Show full text]