Role of the Nestorians As the Connecting Link Between Greek

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Role of the Nestorians As the Connecting Link Between Greek RÔLE OF THE NESTORIANS AS THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN GREEK AND ARABIC MEDICINE* By ALLEN O. WHIPPLE, M.D. NEW YORK HIS paper deals with a period by the question of how Greek culture, of history which is rather dif- which so nearly perished, was trans- ficult to define, for its study in- mitted through the Dark Ages to renas- cludes the last part of the an- cent Europe. As Sarton1 so clearly states cient period and the early centuriesin his of “Introduction to the History of Tthe Middle Ages. Even from the point Science”: of view of Mediterranean culture it is From the point of view of the history of difficult to say when ancient thought science transmission is as essential as dis- ended and medieval thought began. If covery. If the results of Ptolemy’s investi- the Fathers of the Church ushered in gations [in astronomy] had been hidden the medieval period and ended pagan instead of published, or if they had been civilization their chief accomplishment, lost in transit, they would be almost as if considered from the standpoint of sci- they had never been. ence and world culture, lay in the fact If there were no other reason to study that they created a new contact between medieval science than to find out how an- Greek and Oriental thought. It is im- cient knowledge was handed down to us, portant to conceive of Ancient Civiliza- that reason would be sufficient. The aver- tion, the Middle Ages and Renaissance age man of science, perhaps lacking in as not exclusive but as overlapping. historical training, cannot imagine the Certainly in the period of history under complexity of the problems involved. The consideration antiquity merges by im- transmission of modern science is almost perceptible gradations into the Middle automatic; a discovery published in any Ages. scientific journal is within a relatively short time quoted and discussed in a num- In many students of medical history ber of other papers which circulate all over and medical science the mention of the the world. Any scientist, working along Middle or Dark Ages creates a feeling the same line, is bound to hear of it, either of disinterest. if not antagonism. The directly or indirectly, and in the latter case term Dark Ages implies a period of re- he will have no difliculty in obtaining a gression, a time of endless controversy, copy of the original text. A hundred agen- the fruitless arguments of Scholasticism. cies have solved the problem of transmis- If one admires—and who does not—that sion so completely that the individual sci- marvelous bloom of Greek art, science entist does not think of it any more. In and culture in the short period of the the Middle Ages these agencies did not sixth to the fourth centuries before the exist, publication in manuscript form was Christian Era, well termed the “Greek necessarily very limited, and it could never Miracle,” one cannot but be intrigued be standardized. Moreover, political vicis- *From the Department of Surgery, Columbia University. Read before the Section of Historical and Cultural Medicine, N. Y. Academy of Medicine, January 8, 1936. situdes caused innumerable difficulties. was the transmitting medium. It is the Some discoveries had to cross in slow stages w/zy rather than the how which has in- the whole of Asia and Europe before reach- terested the writer. In this paper an ing the West and being integrated into the attempt will be made to analyze the sev- main scientific current wliich has come eral factors that resulted in the Nes- down to us. Some writings had to be trans- torians playing this role of the connect- lated many times before reaching their ing link between Greek and Arabic fmal assimilation; thus many Greek texts became a part of our intellectual patri- medicine. mony only after having been translated Who were the Nestorians and their from Greek to Syriac, from Syriac to Ara- ancestors? Where did they live? What bic, then into Latin, and finally into our were the political and economic factors own language. These translations were in the history of that time that molded imperfect, and in the case of important them and determined their course? works, seldom unique; thus occurred con- How was their national character influ- flicting traditions which caused new dif- enced by the religion and philosophy of ficulties. the period? These are some of the ques- It does not matter whether we like me- tions that naturally come to mind. diaeval science or not; the fact remains Their answers will very largely explain that we cannot arbitrarily neglect it, if we would understand the continuity of hu- the wliy of the title of this communica- man progress. Even if mediaeval scien- tion. tists had not made any original contribu- Exact knowledge of the origin of the tions we should still be obliged to study Nestorians is lacking. In all probability their activity, else it would be impossible their ancestors were a Semitic race, to explain the origin of our present knowl- known as the Aramaeans, which mi- edge. Whatever we learned from the an- grated north from the Arabian penin- cients could not be taught us directly; it sula into what is now spoken of as Syria, could only reach us by some continuous and spread eastward into what the traditions which it is our duty to ferret out. Greeks later called Mesopotamia. The Arab chroniclers referred to them as the So to students of medical history Nabateans. I am indebted to Professor there are now available many brief, more or less accurate accounts of how Hitti of Princeton University for the Greek science and Greek culture were data regarding the probable origin of transmitted through the Mesopotamian the Nestorians. (Map i.) schools, especially those of Edessa and For centuries as Aramaeans they had Gondi-Sapor, in the translations from been given to commerce and by their the Greek into Syriac or Aramaic, and caravans had come in contact witli coun- from the Syriac into Arabic, by the tries north, south, east and west of Meso- rather small, unorthodox Christian sect potamia. Conquered by the forces of of Nestorians who dominated these Alexandria they remained under Greek Mesopotamian schools during the third control until the Seleucidae, torn by in- to the seventh centuries of the Christian ternal strife and political intrigue, gave era. But the mere recording of how up the defense of their Mesopotamian Greek culture and Greek medicine were possessions. There then arose small transmitted by the Nestorians to the kingdoms or principalities in northern Arabic conquerors does not tell why this Mesopotamia, among them Osrhoëne Christian community of Semitic race and Adiabene. The small kingdom of Osrhoëne is of special interest to our given in its relation to Edessan litera- subject. for it was in this principality ture and thcology by Duval5 in his “His- that we first hear of Edessa, its capital. toire d'Edesse.” History2 fairly definitely assigns the Edessa is the Greek name for what founding or rebuilding of Edessa to was called by the Assyrians Ourhai, by Seleucus Nicator in 304 b .c . After the the Arabs Ar-Ruha, and today still withdrawal of the Seleucidae, Edessa exists under Turkish rule as the town was the capital of Osrhoëne under the of Urfa. After its founding in the third rule of a line of kings of a mixed race century b .c . it rcmained a pagan town of Nabatean, Armenian and Parthian until about the middle of the second origin. Barhebraeus,3 speaking of these century when it is said to have been the people, says: “Parthian, Persian, Edes- first city in Mesopotamia to be Chris- san and Armenian are all one.” tianized. Thcre is a most attractive leg- The chronicle and chronology of the cnd, inaccurate though it bc chrono- Osrhoëne kings are based upon a single logically, connccted with the conversion ms in the Vatican, known as the “Chron- of the city to Christianity: Abgar Ouk- icle of Dionysios of Tell-Mahre” writ- hatna, thcn reigning over Osrhoëne, ten in 776 a .d . and translated bv As- hearingof the miraculous cures of Jesus, semani in his “Bibliotheca Orientalis.” scnt him a lettcr asking him to come to This was retranslated by Noëldeke4 and Edcssa to cure him, the King, of a fatal this revised and corrected Chronicle is disease. Jesus rcplied to Abgar: Thou art fortunate, thou who believest living in what is now the province of in me, not having seen me. For it is writ- Kansu, left their ancestral home and ten of me that those who see me do not began swarming to the west and south. believe in me, but those who do not see Within a scant two centuries they had me, believe in me. As to your asking me taken over the eastern provinces of what to come to you, the work for which I was sent is about to be accomplished and I had been Alexander’s empire, con- am to return to my Father who sent me. quered part of Persia, and had become After I have ascended to Him I shall send a threat to Rome. When China con- you one of my disciples who will cure your quered eastern Turkestan a caravan sickness and will convert you and those route was opened between China across about you to life eternal. Thy city shall the Indo-Scythian kingdom to the Per- be blessed and no enemy shall prevail sian and Roman Orient. Thomas Fran- against it.6 cis Carter, in his monograph on the In- This “Legend of Abgar” states that vention of Printing in China,7 one of Addai, supposedly one of the seventy the most scholarly pieces of research of apostles, was sent by the disciple Judas the past decade, discusses the great silk Thomas, who healed Abgar and as a re- ways; he lists the peach and the apricot, sult of this miracle and his preaching silk and tea, porcelain and paper, play- converted Edessa to Christianity in 32 ing cards and probably gunpowder and a .
Recommended publications
  • Investigation of the Idea of Nestorian Crosses— Based on Fa Nixon's
    QUEST: Studies on Religion & Culture in Asia, Vol. 2, 2017 INVESTIGATION OF THE IDEA OF NESTORIAN CROSSES— BASED ON F. A. NIXON’S COLLECTION Chen, Jian Andrea Published online: 1 January 2017 ABSTRACT It is generally agreed that the study of the Nestorian Cross (a kind of bronze piece believed to be an early Chinese Christian relic), has great significance both for the developing study of Jingjiao and for ethnographic studies of the Nestorian Mongol people. The most important question that we should ask, however, is, “Are these so-called Nestorian Crosses part of the Mongolian Nestorian heritage?“ In other words, before starting to interpret the pieces in question, we need to ask if the identification, made at the first step of examination, is convincing enough as a basis upon which to build the interpretation. This paper focuses on issues concerning all aspects of the concept of Nestorian Crosses, looking first into the history of such an idea, then investigating its inner logic, and finally challenging its hard evidence. It is hoped that the conclusions of this paper will initiate a paradigm shift in the current study of this topic. Introduction to the Study The Jingjiao and the Yelikewen The name “Nestorian Crosses” clearly reveals that the religious dimension has been the primary consideration in the existing identification of these items, an identification which subsumes them as relics of Chinese Nestorianism, or more accurately, of the Jingjiao and the Yelikewen. Although controversies surround the identity of Nestorianism, the most commonly accepted description is as follows: At the Ephesus Council of 431 A.D., the Patriarch Nestorius was deemed heretical and his teaching anathematized due to his insistence that Mary should be called “Christotokos (Christ-bearer)” instead of “Theotokos (God-bearer).” This insistence is thought to emphasize a distinction between Christ’s divine and human natures instead of their unity.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Educational Social
    CULTURAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIAL Established 1964 Publication of the Assyrian Foundation of America Volume 43, Number 4, 2019 Books Contents 4 The Lazarists and Daughters of 21 A Son’s Loving Tribute... ComprendreComprendre le M leoyen- Moyen-OrientOrient ClaireClaire Weibel Weibel Yacoub Yacoub La France et les CollectionCollection dirigée dirigée par J.-P. par ChagnollaudJ.-P. Chagnollaud Jonathon Malek QUELLEQUELLE CITOYENNETÉ CITOYENNETÉ LA LAFRANCE FRANCE ET ETLES LES ASSYRO-CHALDÉENS ASSYRO-CHALDÉENS Charity among the Assyro-Chaldeans DANSDANS LES LESCAMPS CAMPS DE RÉFUGIÉSDE RÉFUGIÉS ? ? Qu’enQu’en dit ditla pressela presse ? ? ParmiParmi les Chrétiens les Chrétiens d’Orient, d’Orient, les Arméniens les Arméniens sont sontdevenus devenus familiers familiers Abdulmesih BarAbraham, MSc. Assyro-Chaldéens Les palestiniensLes palestiniens au Liban au Liban aux médiasaux médias et à l’opinionet à l’opinion publique publique française. française. Mais Mais qu’en qu’en est-il est-il des des LALA FRANCEFRANCE Assyro-ChaldéensAssyro-Chaldéens ? Les ?connaît-on Les connaît-on vraiment vraiment ? Sont-ils ? Sont-ils les oubliés les oubliés de de Claire Yacoub Weibel la grandela grande histoire histoire ? ? Claire Yacoub Weibel ETET LES LES ASSYRO-CHALDÉENS ASSYRO-CHALDÉENS Il est unIl est fait un que fait la que presse la presse française, française, toutes toutes tendances tendances confondues, confondues, a parléa parlédes Assyro-Chaldéens,des Assyro-Chaldéens, ces Syro-Mésopotamiens,ces Syro-Mésopotamiens, chrétiens chrétiens 22 Letter from the Assyrian depuisdepuis deux deuxmille milleans. ans. e e Qu’en dit la presse ? Qu’en dit la presse? Dès leDès xix le xixsiècle, siècle, elle répercuteelle répercute abondamment abondamment les récitsles récits des des Qu’en dit la presse ? explorateursexplorateurs et les et événements,les événements, souvent souvent tragiques, tragiques, qui quitouchent touchent les Assyro-Chaldéensles Assyro-Chaldéens aux confinsaux confins des empiresdes empires ottoman ottoman et persan.et persan.
    [Show full text]
  • Christian Theologians Views on the Doctrine of Trinity in the Islamic Philosophical Criticism
    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 2017, Vol. 7, Special Issue – Islam and Contemporary Issues) ISSN: 2222-6990 Christian Theologians Views on the Doctrine of Trinity in the Islamic Philosophical Criticism Mohammad Nashief S. Disomimbaa, Kalsom Alib, Abdussalam s. Disomimbac a Akidah and Religion Program, Faculty of Leadership and Management, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. bDa῾wah and Islamic Management Program, Faculty of Leadership and Management, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia. cKing Faisal Center for Asian and Arabic Studies, Mindanao State University, Philippines DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i13/3195 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i13/3195 ABSTRACT This article discusses the views of Christian theologians on the doctrine of trinity in the light of Islamic philosophical criticism. It focuses the oneness of God through Islamic philosophical criticism, understanding the proofs and evidences of Christian theologians based on their Holy Bible, Athanasius Creed and Nicene Creed. The tendency of giving priority of this study is to show the views of Christian theologians on the doctrine of trinity with Islamic philosophical criticism in order to justify and confirm the oneness of God. The objectives of the study is to identify and trace the historical background of the oneness of God as Creator, to confirm that Jesus Christ is not God and creator, to confirm that God is not three persons and the three persons is not same substance and nature of the Son and Holy Spirit, to analyze and summarize the views of the Christian theologians on the doctrine of Trinity with Islamic philosophical criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Nestorianism 1 Nestorianism
    Nestorianism 1 Nestorianism For the church sometimes known as the Nestorian Church, see Church of the East. "Nestorian" redirects here. For other uses, see Nestorian (disambiguation). Nestorianism is a Christological doctrine advanced by Nestorius, Patriarch of Constantinople from 428–431. The doctrine, which was informed by Nestorius' studies under Theodore of Mopsuestia at the School of Antioch, emphasizes the disunion between the human and divine natures of Jesus. Nestorius' teachings brought him into conflict with some other prominent church leaders, most notably Cyril of Alexandria, who criticized especially his rejection of the title Theotokos ("Bringer forth of God") for the Virgin Mary. Nestorius and his teachings were eventually condemned as heretical at the First Council of Ephesus in 431 and the Council of Chalcedon in 451, leading to the Nestorian Schism in which churches supporting Nestorius broke with the rest of the Christian Church. Afterward many of Nestorius' supporters relocated to Sassanid Persia, where they affiliated with the local Christian community, known as the Church of the East. Over the next decades the Church of the East became increasingly Nestorian in doctrine, leading it to be known alternately as the Nestorian Church. Nestorianism is a form of dyophysitism, and can be seen as the antithesis to monophysitism, which emerged in reaction to Nestorianism. Where Nestorianism holds that Christ had two loosely-united natures, divine and human, monophysitism holds that he had but a single nature, his human nature being absorbed into his divinity. A brief definition of Nestorian Christology can be given as: "Jesus Christ, who is not identical with the Son but personally united with the Son, who lives in him, is one hypostasis and one nature: human."[1] Both Nestorianism and monophysitism were condemned as heretical at the Council of Chalcedon.
    [Show full text]
  • REFLECTIONS on the DOCTRINE of the TRINITY Faith in the Living
    REFLECTIONS ON THE DOCTRINE OF THE TRINITY RAOUL DEDEREN Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan Faith in the living God has been rejected time and again by the ignorant and the indifferent, as well as by many of the learned and the thoughtful. It has been especially chal- lenged today. Such theologians as Bishop John A. T. Robinson of Woolwich, honestly seeking to be Honest to God, urge Christians to abandon most of the phrasing which historically has been used to convey Christian thought. Similarly, the late Bishop James A. Pike of California dismisses many traditional doctrines as old bottles which will inevitably burst and whose bursting should occasion no regrets. In this kind of context many men, even ministers, feel uneasy when they think about the Trinity. The question before us is whether it is time to renounce a doctrine which, by affirming that there are three persons in God, seems to have produced confusion rather than clarification, or whether it was designed to embody values that are a vital and necessary part of the Christian faith. From the days of Arius it has been a chosen scheme with his disciples to represent the doctrine of the Trinity as an artificial theological construct, and consequently unimportant. To a large number of Christians, however, it is a doctrine fundament4 to Christianity since it deals with a correct knowledge of God. Related to the divine Being, his nature and mode of being, this knowledge affects every man's understanding of God as the object of his worship, whether he regards him as one in essence and one in person, or admits that in the unity of the Deity there are three equally divine persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Logos-Sarx Christology and the Sixth-Century Miaenergism
    VOX PATRUM 37 (2017) t. 67 Oleksandr KASHCHUK* LOGOS-SARX CHRISTOLOGY AND THE SIXTH-CENTURY MIAENERGISM From the early years of Christian theology to the Council of Ephesus (431) the main task for Christology was to affirm the reality of both divinity and humanity in the person of Christ. Each of the great theological centers, such as Antioch and Alexandria, was to emphasize a different aspect of Christology in defense of orthodoxy. After the Council of Nicaea (325) the adherents of consubstantial (ÐmooÚsioj) saw difficulty in defining the reality of Christ’s humanity. This question arose in the period between Nicaea and Ephesus (325- 431). Bishops and theologians stressed the unity of subject of Christ and the truth of his humanity. Although during the time from Ephesus to Chalcedon (431-451) the fullness of divinity and humanity were acknowledged by majo- rity, there arose the debate concerning the relationship between the human and divine elements within Christ on the one hand and relationship between these elements on the other. The debate passed into the question concerning the ex- pression of Christ’s two natures coexisting in one person. So the main focus of the Christological discussion in the sixth century shifted from the problem of unity and interrelation between elements in Christ to the expression of unity through activity and its consequences for the fullness of Christ’s humanity. The issue of Christ’s operation and will thus became the most prevalent ques- tions in Christology from the late sixth to the early seventh centuries. At that time there arose the Miaenergist debate concerning whether Christ had a whol- ly human as well as a wholly divine operation and volition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trinity and the Freedom of God
    Journal for Christian Theological Research Volume 8 Article 1 2003 The rT inity and the Freedom of God Paul D. Molnar St. John's University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/jctr Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Molnar, Paul D. (2003) "The rT inity and the Freedom of God," Journal for Christian Theological Research: Vol. 8 , Article 1. Available at: http://digitalcommons.luthersem.edu/jctr/vol8/iss2003/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal for Christian Theological Research by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Luther Seminary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal for Christian Theological Research 8 (2003) 59–66 The Trinity and the Freedom of God Paul D. Molnar St. John’s University A contemporary doctrine of the immanent Trinity is essential for recognizing, upholding and respecting divine freedom as the basis of relevant theological activity and genuine human freedom. In this article I contend that divine freedom will be recognized and respected only if and to the extent that such recognition is grounded in God’s actual freedom for us exercised in the history of Jesus Christ and through the action of his Holy Spirit.¹ Hearing this thesis in a vacuum one could perhaps wonder why anyone would bother to say this at all since most contemporary theologians would agree with this thesis, at least formally. But this thesis is in fact loaded because, while most Christian theologians would agree that a doctrine of the immanent Trinity should help us recognize, uphold and respect God’s freedom as the basis, meaning and goal of human freedom, very many contemporary theologians tend to read back their experiences and concepts into God instead of allowing God the eternal Father, Son and Holy Spirit to defi ne the content of those concepts and experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Evangelism and Capitalism: a Reparative Account and Diagnosis of Pathogeneses in the Relationship
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - Portland Seminary Portland Seminary 6-2018 Evangelism and Capitalism: A Reparative Account and Diagnosis of Pathogeneses in the Relationship Jason Paul Clark George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Clark, Jason Paul, "Evangelism and Capitalism: A Reparative Account and Diagnosis of Pathogeneses in the Relationship" (2018). Faculty Publications - Portland Seminary. 132. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/gfes/132 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Portland Seminary at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - Portland Seminary by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EVANGELICALISM AND CAPITALISM A reparative account and diagnosis of pathogeneses in the relationship A thesis submitted to Middlesex University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Jason Paul Clark Middlesex University Supervised at London School of Theology June 2018 Abstract Jason Paul Clark, “Evangelicalism and Capitalism: A reparative account and diagnosis of pathogeneses in the relationship.” Doctor of Philosophy, Middlesex University, 2018. No sustained examination and diagnosis of problems inherent to the relationship of Evangeli- calism with capitalism currently exists. Where assessments of the relationship have been un- dertaken, they are often built upon a lack of understanding of Evangelicalism, and an uncritical reliance both on Max Weber’s Protestant Work Ethic and on David Bebbington’s Quadrilateral of Evangelical priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Council of Constantinople : 869-870
    Fourth Council of Constantinople : 869-870 CONTENTS ● Definition ● Canons INTRODUCTION This council, designated as the eighth ecumenical council by western canonists, is not found in any canonical collections of the Byzantines; its acts and canons are completely ignored by them. Modern scholars have shown that it was included in the list of ecumenical councils only later, that is, after the eleventh century. We have decided to include the council, for the sake of historical completeness. Emperor Basil I and the patriarch Ignatius, after being restored to his see of Constantinople, asked Pope Nicholas I to call a council to decide about the bishops and priests who had been ordained by Photius. It was held at Constantinople after the arrival of legates from Pope Hadrian II, who had meanwhile succeeded Nicholas. These legates were Donatus, Stephen and Marinus and they presided at the council. It began in the cathedral of Hagia Sophia on 5 October 869. The tenth and last session was held on 28 February 870, when 27 canons were read out and approved by the council. All who were willing to sign the Liber satisfactionis, which had been sent by Pope Hadrian II, were admitted to the council. The account made by Anastasius contains the authentic list of those who signed the acts of the council. Emperor Basil I and his sons, Constantine and Leo, signed the acts after the patriarchs and in the same year they promulgated the council's decisions, after drawing up a decree for this purpose. As regards the canonical authority of these deliberations, various facts regarding the council held in the cathedral of Hagia Sophia in November 879, so that Photius might be restored to the see of Constantinople, should be remembered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transfiguration in the Theology of Gregory Palamas And
    Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Spring 2015 Deus in se et Deus pro nobis: The rT ansfiguration in the Theology of Gregory Palamas and Its Importance for Catholic Theology Cory Hayes Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Hayes, C. (2015). Deus in se et Deus pro nobis: The rT ansfiguration in the Theology of Gregory Palamas and Its Importance for Catholic Theology (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/640 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEUS IN SE ET DEUS PRO NOBIS: THE TRANSFIGURATION IN THE THEOLOGY OF GREGORY PALAMAS AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR CATHOLIC THEOLOGY A Dissertation Submitted to the McAnulty Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Cory J. Hayes May 2015 Copyright by Cory J. Hayes 2015 DEUS IN SE ET DEUS PRO NOBIS: THE TRANSFIGURATION IN THE THEOLOGY OF GREGORY PALAMAS AND ITS IMPORTANCE FOR CATHOLIC THEOLOGY By Cory J. Hayes Approved March 31, 2015 _______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Bogdan Bucur Dr. Radu Bordeianu Associate Professor of Theology Associate Professor of Theology (Committee Chair) (Committee Member) _______________________________ Dr. Christiaan Kappes Professor of Liturgy and Patristics Saints Cyril and Methodius Byzantine Catholic Seminary (Committee Member) ________________________________ ______________________________ Dr. James Swindal Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Maximus the Confessor and His Defense of Papal Primacy
    Love that unites and vanishes: Saint Maximus the Confessor and his defense of papal primacy Author: Jason C. LaLonde Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:108614 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2019 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Love that Unites and Vanishes: Saint Maximus the Confessor and his Defense of Papal Primacy Thesis for the Completion of the Licentiate in Sacred Theology Boston College School of Theology and Ministry Fr. Jason C. LaLonde, S.J. Readers: Fr. Brian Dunkle, S.J., BC-STM Dr. Adrian Walker, Catholic University of America May 3, 2019 2 Introduction 3 Chapter One: Maximus’s Palestinian Provenance: Overcoming the Myth of the Greek Life 10 Chapter Two: From Monoenergism to Monotheletism: The Role of Honorius 32 Chapter Three: Maximus on Roman Primacy and his Defense of Honorius 48 Conclusion 80 Appendix – Translation of Opusculum 20 85 Bibliography 100 3 Introduction The current research project stems from my work in the course “Latin West, Greek East,” taught by Fr. Brian Dunkle, S.J., at the Boston College School of Theology and Ministry in the fall semester of 2016. For that course, I translated a letter of Saint Maximus the Confessor (580- 662) that is found among his works known collectively as the Opuscula theologica et polemica.1 My immediate interest in the text was Maximus’s treatment of the twin heresies of monoenergism and monotheletism. As I made progress
    [Show full text]
  • Early-Christianity-Timeline.Pdf
    Pagan Empire Christian Empire 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 1 AD Second 'Bishop' of Rome. Pupil of Student of Polycarp. First system- Bishop of Nyssa, brother of Basil. Pope. The Last Father of the Peter. Author of a letter to Corinth, atic theologian, writing volumi- Bishop of Original and sophisticated theologi- model of St Gregory the Church. First of the St John of (1 Clement), the earliest Christian St Clement of Rome nously about the Gospels and the St Irenaeus St Cyprian Carthage. an, writing on Trinitarian doctrine Gregory of Nyssa an ideal Scholastics. Polymath, document outside the NT. church, and against heretics. and the Nicene creed. pastor. Great monk, and priest. Damascus Former disciple of John the Baptist. Prominent Prolific apologist and exegete, the Archbishop of Constantinople, St Leo the Pope. Able administrator in very Archbishop of Seville. Encyclopaedist disciple of Jesus, who became a leader of the most important thinker between Paul brother of Basil. Greatest rhetorical hard times, asserter of the prima- and last great scholar of the ancient St Peter Judean and later gentile Christians. Author of two St Justin Martyr and Origen, writing on every aspect stylist of the Fathers, noted for St Gregory Nazianzus cy of the see of Peter. Central to St Isidore world, a vital link between the learning epistles. Source (?) of the Gospel of Mark. of life, faith and worship. writing on the Holy Spirit. Great the Council of Chalcedon. of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Claimed a knowledge and vision of Jesus independent Pupil of Justin Martyr. Theologian.
    [Show full text]