Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Years of Service, Self-Efficacy, Stress and Burnout Among Polish Firefighters

Years of Service, Self-Efficacy, Stress and Burnout Among Polish Firefighters

ORIGINAL PAPER

International Journal of Occupational and Environmental 2020;33(3):283 – 297 https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01483

YEARS OF SERVICE, SELF-EFFICACY, AND BURNOUT AMONG POLISH FIREFIGHTERS MARTA MAKARA-STUDZIŃSKA1, ZBIGNIEW WAJDA1, and SEBASTIAN LIZIŃCZYK2 1 Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland Medical College, Department of Health 2 SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Katowice, Poland Faculty of Psychology

Abstract Objectives: The aim of the research was to analyze the impact of selected factors: years of service, the number of interventions, self-efficacy and stress, on occupational burnout. It was hypothesized that firefighters with more years of service and a bigger number of interventions would be characterized by higher perceived stress and burnout, and that self-efficacy would have an impact on reducing the level of perceived stress and burnout. Material and Methods: The participants were firefighters (N = 576) from 12 Polish voivodeships, aged 20–58 years, with different seniority: up to 3, 4–8, 9–15 or >15 years of service. The following research tools were used: the Link Burnout Questionnaire, the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale, the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale, and an independent questionnaire to gather additional information. A correlation between particular variables was carried out; the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed together with a post-hoc analysis to examine differences in the severity of individual variables depending on seniority, followed by a path analysis studied together with the identification of direct and indirect impacts. Results: The number of interventions did not affect the severity of experienced stress or any of the aspects of burnout. Work experience directly influenced the level of perceived stress (β = 0.219), disillusion (β = 0.076), and relationship deterioration (β = –0.156). The generalized sense of self-efficacy was found to impact both on re- ducing the sense of stress (β = –0.418) and on all 4 aspects of professional burnout: psychophysical exhaustion (β = –0.181), relationship deterioration (β = –0.16), the sense of professional inefficacy (β = –0.275) and disillusion (β = –0.143). Conclusions: The results have shown that: 1) the number of interventions does not affect the severity of experienced stress or particular aspects of burnout; 2) years of service increase the severity of experienced stress and occupational burnout; 3) self-efficacy has an impact both on reducing the sense of stress and on all aspects of burnout. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020;33(3):283–97

Key words: stress, burnout, firefighters, self-efficacy, years of service, Link Burnout Questionnaire

INTRODUCTION to be on duty. In turn, traumatic stress includes events di- Firefighters are a professional group particularly exposed rectly related to interventions: a direct threat to one’s life to stressful situations. Previous studies have shown that and to the life and health of one’s colleagues, as well as this professional group may be exposed to both chronic being a witness to the tragedy of other people – including stress and traumatic events. The sources of chronic stress their death [1,2]. in the profession of a firefighter include low control over Empirical studies have indicated that situations at work, a low , the fear of losing one’s , can be a factor which increases the risk of burnout in various insufficient resources, working shifts, and the requirement groups, e.g., among nurses [3], teachers [4], doctors [5,6],

Funding: this research was supported by the Jagiellonian University Medical College (project No. K/ZDS/007106, entitled “Stress at work, self-efficacy and burnout syndromes – analysis of dependencies in social service professions,” project manager: Prof. Marta Makara-Studzińska). Received: May 13, 2019. Accepted: January 22, 2020. Corresponding author: Zbigniew Wajda, Neurosis and Eating Disorder Treatment Centre “Dąbrówka”, Asnyka 10, 44-122 Gliwice, Poland (e-mail: zbigniew.wajda@ gmail.com).

Nofer Institute of , Łódź, Poland 283 ORIGINAL PAPER M. MAKARA-STUDZIŃSKA ET AL.

factory employees [7], or the prison service [8]. With re- a positive correlation between age, work experience and spect to the firefighting profession, it can be seen that -al burnout [13], the lack of such a correlation [14], as well as though studies on this population have an increasing pres- a curvilinear (U-shaped) correlation [15]. ence in literature, the number of studies is still relatively Cherniss [16] pointed out that a useful psychological vari- poorly compared to other professions. Mitani et al. [9] able for understanding the sense of stress and the severity conducted research on a group of firefighters who showed of occupational burnout could be generalized self-efficacy. a relationship between burnout and both traumatic and This concept was introduced to psychology as part of Ban- chronic stress. It was shown that social support and in- dura’s theory of social learning [17], and it refers to con- terpersonal relations in the workplace mitigated occu- victions regarding the possibility of reaching goals or cop- pational burnout. Similar studies, but on a much larger ing with various situations in life. Research on this variable number of participants, were conducted by Katsavouni allows one to assume that self-efficacy is also relevant to et al. [10]. They identified multidimensional relationships firefighters in terms of its motivational properties [18], -in between injuries sustained in the course of professional fluence on undertaking various activities and coping with activities, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), burnout stress [1,19,20]. syndrome, age and seniority of the participants. Research Research has been carried out in Poland on the psycho- by Smith et al. [11] showed that occupational stress among logical aspects of firefighters’ work, such as the sense of firefighters and family-work conflicts were predictors of coherence and PTSD [21], stress in the context of firefight- occupational burnout, which in turn was associated with ers’ health [22], experienced stress in the context of other a decrease in behavior conducive to work safety. professions [23], the occurrence of post-traumatic reac- It seems that, apart from the phenomenon of the experi- tions, including PTSD and post-traumatic growth (PTG), ence of stress, one of the variables that may have an im- compared to both firefighters from other countries [24] pact on occupational burnout is also the number of years and other professions [25–29]. This research focuses less of stressful work (seniority) to which firefighters are sub- often on occupational burnout among Polish firefighters. jected. On the one hand, it can be assumed that young In one such study, Ogińska-Bulik and Kaflik-Pieróg [1] employees who start their professional with beliefs examined the relationship between stress, the sense of that are relatively less realistic may be the most exposed efficacy and burnout. The results they obtained indicate to occupational burnout, as their ideals are often verified that Polish firefighters present a lower level of burnout by everyday reality. It is also worth noting that novice fire- compared to policemen, nurses, doctors and teachers. fighters (and thus the youngest) go through a period of Furthermore, it was shown that although the sense of self- initial adaptation, verification of their own suitability for efficacy negatively correlated with exhaustion, it did not the profession, the sense of a low professional position, significantly correlate with other aspects of occupational and the need to develop appropriate mechanisms for cop- burnout. ing with stress in their profession. Some studies have con- Basińska and Wiciak [30] studied fatigue and burnout in firmed that the highest risk of occupational burnout oc- firefighters and policemen in the context of . curs at the beginning of a firefighter’s and decreases This study shows that fatigue increases such components with age and seniority [7,12]. This conclusion, however, of occupational burnout as psychophysical exhaustion and is not so obvious, because there are many contradictory the lack of commitment to customer relationships. Fac- reports in this regard. There are studies that point to tors pertaining to the of working hours and

284 IJOMEH 2020;33(3) BURNOUT AMONG POLISH FIREFIGHTERS ORIGINAL PAPER

shift work affected fatigue and burnout. Firefighters felt ones, increases [23,33]. Furthermore, the results of re- less tired than policemen and nurses, which the authors search on firefighters in one country do not correspond explained in terms of their work characteristics. directly with the results in another country in all instanc- Krok [31] examined the relationships between the mean- es [24]. Literature reviews show that investigations into ing in life and burnout among firefighters. Those who professional burnout relatively seldom involved only fire- had higher levels of personal meaning and the presence fighters, especially when compared to other professions. of meaning less frequently reported emotional exhaus- The scope of each of these studies frequently included tion and depersonalization, and more frequently efficacy. traumatic stress (not daily pressures), and the combina- Most of the personal meaning dimensions (e.g., personal tion of variables was limited to only a few internal (psy- meaning, the presence of meaning, a search for mean- chological) or external ones, while sample sizes were ing) had significant associations with burnout indicators: usually small [21–23,25–30]. To the best of the authors’ the participants with a detached style had higher levels of knowledge, the significance of combinations of individual and depersonalization than those psychological features (the level of perceived stress, self- with a presence style or with a presence and search style. efficacy) and factors related to the work itself (the number The above data suggest the lack of a clear answer to the of years of service, the number of interventions) have not questions pertaining to links between seniority and burn- been studied among Polish firefighters. out, especially as previous research was conducted mainly These premises became the basis for designing a study among medical services and teachers, and less frequently investigating a large number of firefighters and creat- among firefighters. As the studies cited above have re- ing a hypothetical model of mutual links between their vealed, the intensity of stress, burnout and working condi- experiences relating to this work – the number of inter- tions in services differ, and it is, therefore, not possible to ventions, generalized self-efficacy, and perceived stress translate these data directly from one professional group and individual levels of occupational burnout (Figure 1). to another. It is hypothesized that the number of years of service, It seems that the specific aspects of firefighters’ work can the number of interventions in a given year, and the level have a significant impact on the variables discussed. Fire- of perceived stress will have an impact on the increase fighters have a characteristic profile of vulnerability to in professional burnout. In other words, firefighters with professional stress, which includes direct risks to their own higher seniority and who have participated in more inter- health or life. As revealed by Koniarek and Dudek [25], ventions will, on the one hand, be characterized by a high- and Ogińska-Bulik and Kaflik-Pieróg [32], >80% of fire- er level of experienced stress and show a higher level of fighters have experienced a traumatic event and >70% occupational burnout. On the other hand, the self-effica- of them have participated in such an event at least twice. cy of firefighters will have an inversely proportional effect Other data show that each year in the USA about 100 fire- both on their levels of experienced stress and particular fighters are killed in action, and that 58 835 were injured aspects of burnout. in 2017 (a decrease of 5% in comparison to the previous year) [33,34]. MATERIAL AND METHODS Some authors assume that the work of a firefighter is Participants not stressful in itself, but that it becomes stressful when The participants were 576 professionally active firefighters the number of interventions, especially extremely difficult from 12 voivodeships in Poland. All subjects were male and

IJOMEH 2020;33(3) 285 ORIGINAL PAPER M. MAKARA-STUDZIŃSKA ET AL.

Years H:+ LBQ-1 of service H:+ psychophysical exhaustion

H:+ H:+ LBQ-2 relationship deterioration Number H:+ Perceived stress of interventions (measured with PSS) H:+ H:– LBQ-3 sense of professional inefficacy

H:+ Generalized self-efficacy H:– LBQ-4 (measured with GSES) disillusion

GSES – General Self-Efficacy Scale; LBQ – Link Burnout Questionnaire; PSS – Perceived Stress Scale.

Figure 1. A proposed model of mutual links between experiences relating to firefighters’ work in the study on occupational burnout among Polish firefighters

the mean age was 35 years (SD = 6.72, min. = 20, max = These subgroups were set arbitrarily at the research plan- 58). Among them, there were 42 (7.29%) rank-and-file ning , and their members completed a specially de- firefighters, 315 (54.69%) with the rank of non-commis- signed questionnaire in which they were assigned to one sioned officer, 131 (22.74%) with the degree of inspector, of the following subgroups: a short duration of service 61 (10.59%) with the rank of junior officer, and 27 (4.69%) (0–3 years), a medium duration of service (4–8 years), with the rank of senior officer. As regards the marital sta- a long duration of service (9–15 years), and a very long tus, 112 (19.44%) of the firefighters were unmarried, 427 duration of service (>15 years). It was assumed that (74.13%) were married, 15 (2.60%) cohabited with a part- the number of participants in the individual subgroups ner, and 22 (3.82%) were separated or divorced. As re- would be equal; however, due to the fact that not all of gards education, 281 (48.78%) of the firefighters had sec- the participants completed the questionnaire, these sub- ondary education, 55 (9.55%) post-secondary education, groups had varying numbers. 125 (21.70%) the bachelor’s degree, and 115 (19.97%) Table 1 shows that rank in the corps increases with the num- the master’s degree. The duration of service of the fire- ber of years of service. Family characteristics also change fighters was: 0–3 years – 45 participants (7.81%); 4–8 years according to the duration of service: workers with fewer – 152 participants (26.39%); 9–15 years – 238 participants years of service are more often unmarried without children, (41.32%) and ≥16 years – 141 participants (24.48%), in- while those who have more years of service are more likely cluding 11 participants (1.91%) with >25 years of service. to be married and have children. The firefighters had 972.82 interventions in the previous year on average (SD = 562.27, Me = 926, min. = 0, max = Burnout 2.400). Table 1 below presents selected demographic data The Polish version of the Link Burnout Questionnaire for the 4 specific subgroups of firefighters that were -cre (LBQ) [35,36], created by the Laboratory of Psycho- ated on the basis of their years of service. logical Tests of the Polish Psychological Society [37],

286 IJOMEH 2020;33(3) BURNOUT AMONG POLISH FIREFIGHTERS ORIGINAL PAPER

Table 1. Selected demographic data according to years of service in a group of active firefighters from 12 Polish voivodeships

Participants (N = 576) Variable subgroup A subgroup B subgroup C subgroup D (N = 45) (N = 152) (N = 238) (N = 141) Corps [%] rank-and-file 64 6 2 0 non-commissioned officer 9 63 68 37 inspector 24 25 18 28 officer 2 6 12 35 Marital status [%] unmarried 27 21 22 11 married 67 73 71 84 cohabiting 2 3 3 2 separated/divorced 4 4 4 3 widowed 0 0 0 0 Children [n] 0 91 53 15 6 1 9 21 31 21 2 22 44 61 3 4 7 11 4 2 1

Subgroup A: 0–3 years of service; subgroup B: 4–8 years of service; subgroup C: 9–15 years of service; subgroup D: >15 years of service. was used. This measure consists of 24 items, in relation amounted to 0.82 for psychophysical exhaustion (LBQ-1), to which the subject responds on a 6-point Likert scale 0.73 for relationship deterioration (LBQ-2), 0.60 for the (from “never” to “daily”). The questionnaire has 4 di- sense of professional inefficacy (LBQ-3), and 0.81 for mensions (scales) that are designed to study occupational disillusion (LBQ-4). burnout, i.e., psychophysical exhaustion (LBQ-1), rela- tionship deterioration (LBQ-2), the sense of professional Level of stress inefficacy (LBQ-3) and disillusion (LBQ-4). Each scale The Polish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) measures these dimensions on a continuum between low [38] (Juczyński and Ogińska-Bulik [39]) was employed. and high severity. The questionnaire in the Polish version It contains 10 questions that concern subjective feel- has good psychometric properties. The scale of disillusion ings related to personal problems and events, behaviors (Cronbach’s α 0.84) has the highest internal reliability and ways of coping. The respondent answers the ques- and the scale pertaining to the sense of professional in- tions using a 5-point Likert scale (from “never” to “very efficacy (Cronbach’s α 0.68) has the lowest internal reli- often”). In the Polish version, the scale has obtained ability. In this research, Cronbach’s α for individual scales very good psychometric properties with a Cronbach’s α

IJOMEH 2020;33(3) 287 ORIGINAL PAPER M. MAKARA-STUDZIŃSKA ET AL.

value of 0.86. In the presented studies, Cronbach’s α the number of years of service, generalized self-efficacy, was 0.82. perceived stress and various aspects of burnout were presented. Self-efficacy Previous studies [11] have indicated the possibility of sig- The Polish version of the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale nificant correlations between family factors and stress at (GSES) [40,41], based on Bandura’s theory of social work, and, as the results of the path analyses obtained by learning [17], was employed. It consists of 10 questions to the authors also indicated that possibility, it was decided which the participant responds using a 4-point Likert scale to perform several additional analyses that were not in- (from “definitely not” to “definitely yes”). Cronbach’s α in cluded in the initial research plan. The level of perceived the Polish version was 0.85. In the studies presented in this stress and 4 aspects of occupational burnout in the mar- paper, Cronbach’s α was 0.76. ried and unmarried participants were compared using Stu- dent’s t-test. Demographic and other factors The participants were also asked about their age, senior- RESULTS ity, corps, education, and other demographic data and Table 2 shows the correlation between the number of years characteristics. The duration of service was determined of service, the average number of interventions in 2016, arbitrarily so that it could reflect employees with a short, the level of experienced stress, the sense of generalized medium, long, and very long duration of service. The par- self-efficacy, and individual aspects of burnout: - psycho ticipants completed the questionnaire by choosing the ap- physical exhaustion, relationship deterioration, the sense propriate subgroup. of professional inefficacy, and disillusion. The results in- dicate that the number of years of service as a firefighter Ethics significantly correlates with all of the dimensions of pro- This project was approved by the Bioethics Committee fessional burnout, as well as with the level of perceived and was carried out in accordance with the recommenda- stress. These correlations, though weak, are significant. tions of the American Psychological Association’s Code The number of interventions in the year preceding the sur- of Ethics. vey did not reveal any significant relationships. It is proba- bly not the number of interventions or their particular cir- Statistics cumstances that may play an important role in the burnout The authors used SPSS (version 25) for statistical analy- process. The results show that the variable “generalized ses. The threshold of statistical significance was set at self-efficacy” is an important factor that negatively- cor the level of 0.5. At the preliminary stage, Pearson’s r was relates with the dimensions of professional burnout as carried out between all the variables. Then, the obtained well as with the level of experienced stress. In contrast, mean results and differences between individual variables the level of experienced stress was significantly and posi- were presented according to years of service. The Kruskal- tively related to the dimensions of occupational burnout. Wallis test was used, followed by post-hoc analyses, which The statistical analyses further showed that the seniority revealed differences in the level of the variables for par- of the firefighters predicted the value of the variables. ticular subgroups. At the last stage, which used the path Table 3 shows the means and standard deviations for all analysis in the AMOS program, the relationship between of the variables tested for each of the subgroups, pertain-

288 IJOMEH 2020;33(3) BURNOUT AMONG POLISH FIREFIGHTERS ORIGINAL PAPER

Table 2. Pearson’s correlations between the variables in a group of active firefighters (N = 576) from 12 Polish voivodeships

Pearson’s correlations Variable 1. 2. 3. 4. Work-related variables 1. Years of service – 2. Average number of interventions in 2016 0.091* – General Self-Efficacy Scale 3. Generalized self-efficacy –0.016 0.06 – Perceived Stress Scale 4. Perceived stress 0.226*** –0.035 –0.420*** – Link Burnout Questionnaire 5. Psychophysical exhaustion (LBQ-1) 0.137*** –0.34 –0.353*** 0.494*** 6. Relationship deterioration (LBQ-2) –0.092* –0.61 –0.273*** 0.300*** 7. Sense of professional inefficacy (LBQ-3) 0.092* –0.014 –0.377*** 0.363*** 8. Disillusion (LBQ-4) 0.164*** –0.049 –0.304*** 0.457***

*** Statistical significance <0.001; ** statistical significance <0.01; * statistical significance <0.05.

Table 3. Differences in the severity of experienced stress and particular aspects of occupational burnout, depending on the number of years of service, using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc test, in a group of active firefighters from 12 Polish voivodeships

Participants (N = 576) Variable (M±SD) p subgroup A subgroup B subgroup C subgroup D (N = 45) (N = 152) (N = 238) (N = 141) Perceived Stress Scale perceived stressa 11.84±5.64 13.64±5.60 15.44±5.29 16.14±6.03 0.001 post-hocb AD: p < 0.05 sense of professional inefficacy (LBQ-3)a 12.02±4.14 13.08±3.97 13.79±4.51 13.77±4.65 0.05 post-hoc A

IJOMEH 2020;33(3) 289 ORIGINAL PAPER M. MAKARA-STUDZIŃSKA ET AL.

Years LBQ-1 –0.181*** of service –0.156*** psychophysical exhaustion 0.408***

LBQ-2 –0.162*** 0.268*** relationship deterioration 0.219*** Perceived stress (measured with PSS) 0.241*** –0.418*** LBQ-3 –0.275*** sense of professional inefficacy

0.381*** –0.143*** Generalized self-efficacy 0.076*** LBQ-4 (measured with GSES) disillusion

Matching indicators: Chi2 = 0.145, df = 1, p > 0.05, RMSEA = 0.001, CFI = 0.999. Explanations as in Figure 1. For the readability of the graph, the graphic markings of irrelevant paths were omitted.

Figure 2. A model of path factors explaining various aspects of professional burnout in a group of firefighters.

ing to the number of years of service. The table also pres- variables was not shown at the earlier stage of the analy- ents the results of the differences between the means of all sis (Table 1). As expected, the variable “generalized self- participants, compared with the means of the subgroups efficacy” affected both the level of perceived stress (β = which differed in terms of seniority. The results show that –0.418) and all 4 aspects of professional burnout, of which the variable “perceived stress” is higher in the group with the most significant variable was “the sense of professional a longer duration of service, and that this effect is similar inefficacy” (LBQ-3; β = –0.275). for the following variables related to burnout: psychophysi- Table 4 presents standardized results of estimating the im- cal exhaustion (LBQ-1) and disillusion (LBQ-4). The mean pact of individual independent variables on the level of of the variable “lack of involvement in customer relations” perceived stress and 4 aspects of occupational burnout. was slightly lower in the group of participants working The total effect of a given independent variable on a depen- >15 years compared to those with fewer years of service. dent variable can easily be seen, as well as the distinction The path model presented in Figure 2 contains 2 types of between direct and indirect effects. As can be seen from results: the table, the strongest relationship occurs between gen- – an estimation of the model fit, in which the indicators eralized self-efficacy and perceived stress (β = –0.418). show that it has a good fit (χ2 = 0.145, df = 1, p > 0.05, RMSEA = 0.001, CFI = 0.999); Additional analysis and results – standardized results of the estimation of the strength Tables 5 and 6 present a comparison of the average results of the relationship between the variables included in obtained for married vs. unmarried firefighters, and those the model. with children vs. those without children. The model did not include the variable “number of in- Tables 5 and 6 show that the subgroups of firefighters dif- terventions,” because its linear relationship with other fer in the level of perceived stress and in only 1 aspect

290 IJOMEH 2020;33(3) BURNOUT AMONG POLISH FIREFIGHTERS ORIGINAL PAPER

Table 4. Standardized results of regression analyses performed on the total effect, direct effect and indirect effect in group of active firefighters (N = 576) from 12 Polish voivodeships

Effect (β) Variable generalized self-efficacy perceived stress years of service (measured with GSES) (measured with PSS) total direct indirect total direct indirect total direct indirect Perceived stress –0.418 –0.418 0.000 0.219 0.219 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Burnout psychophysical exhaustion (LBQ-1) –0.351 –0.181 –0.171 0.132 0.042 0.089 0.408 0.408 0.000 relationship deterioration (LBQ-2) –0.274 –0.162 –0.112 –0.097 –0.156 0.059 0.268 0.268 0.000 sense of professional inefficacy (LBQ-3) –0.375 –0.275 –0.101 0.087 0.034 0.053 0.241 0.241 0.000 disillusion (LBQ-4) –0.302 –0.143 –0.159 0.159 0.076 0.083 0.381 0.381 0.000

GSES – Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale; LBQ – Link Burnout Questionnaire; PSS – Perceived Stress Scale.

Table 5. Comparison of the level of perceived stress and 4 aspects of burnout in married and unmarried firefighters, using Student’s t-test, in a group of active firefighters from 12 Polish voivodeships

Participants (N = 540) Variable (M±SD) t p df unmarried married (N = 113) (N = 427) Perceived stress 14.00±5.96 15.19±5.82 1.98 0.480 539 Burnout psychophysical exhaustion (LBQ-1) 15.22±5.33 15.79±5.66 –0.97 0.330 539 relationship deterioration (LBQ-2) 16.96±4.16 16.44±4.38 1.13 0.260 539 sense of professional inefficacy (LBQ-3) 12.97±4.25 13.58±4.45 –1.31 0.190 539 disillusion (LBQ-4) 12.42±5.58 13.96±6.16 –2.40 0.020* 539

LBQ – Link Burnout Questionnaire. * Statistical significance <0.05. of occupational burnout, namely disillusion (LBQ-4). perceived stress on 4 aspects of the professional burnout Although the differences have reached statistical signifi- experienced by firefighters, namely psychophysical exhaus- cance, the absolute values are relatively modest. tion, relationship deterioration, the sense of professional inefficacy, and disillusion. The most important results DISCUSSION obtained in the research show that the number of inter- The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of the fol- ventions neither affected the level of perceived stress nor lowing selected factors: the number of years of service, the individual aspects of occupational burnout. Although the number of interventions, generalized self-efficacy and this result may seem surprising, it should be noted that

IJOMEH 2020;33(3) 291 ORIGINAL PAPER M. MAKARA-STUDZIŃSKA ET AL.

Table 6. Comparison of the level of perceived stress and 4 aspects of burnout in firefighters with and without children, using Student’s t-test, in a group of active firefighters from 12 Polish voivodeships

Participants (N = 576) Variable (M±SD) t p df without children fathers (N = 169) (N = 407) Perceived stress 13.81±5.94 15.30±5.56 –2.88 0.010* 574 Burnout psychophysical exhaustion (LBQ-1) 15.39±5.32 15.84±5.73 –0.87 0.380 574 relationship deterioration (LBQ-2) 16.65±3.87 16.51±4.60 0.34 0.740 574 sense of professional inefficacy (LBQ-3) 13.06±4.24 13.63±4.45 –1.43 0.150 574 disillusion (LBQ-4) 12.81±5.84 14.07±6.22 –2.26 0.030* 574

LBQ – Link Burnout Questionnaire. * Statistical significance <0.05.

the variable “number of interventions” is quite general as than traumatic stress resulting from exposure to extremely it does not fully reflect the specificity of a firefighter’s job. stressful events [38,39]. Firefighters, due to their profession, are exposed to situa- The obtained results confirmed the impact of seniority on tions that directly threaten their life and health, or involve the level of perceived stress and burnout by firefighters. being a witness to various human tragedies [1,2,10,23,24]. Similar conclusions can be drawn as regards the relation- However, practicing this profession does not necessarily ship between seniority and the level of stress experienced mean that each intervention entails a high degree of stress by the firefighters. Both the correlation analysis and and exposure to traumatic events. Therefore, the number the subsequent analysis of the path model showed that of interventions probably does not correlate directly with the level of stress experienced by the firefighters increased the levels of experienced stress or the indicators of burn- as a function of the number of years of service. out. There are also studies [1,30] indicating that firefighters This can possibly be understood by taking into account may have a lower level of occupational burnout than other 2 factors. First of all, the number of years of service is professional groups. Their authors claim that this may be often related to promotion to a higher rank, which cre- related to some specific aspects of firefighters’ work, name- ates a new scope of duties involving a gradual shift from ly the facts that between interventions they have the op- executive functions to command functions. This, in turn, portunity to rest and recover psychologically, they deal with increases the scope of responsibility, including responsi- “technical” assistance more often, and they are exposed to bility for the health and life of one’s subordinates. Second, a lesser extent to the constant interpersonal stress with the number of years of service is also related to age, and it which police officers, teachers or nurses have to deal. is, therefore, usually associated with a change in one’s so- In addition, it should be noted that PSS-10 was used in cial, family and economic status. Young people are mainly the present study, which examines the intensity of per- responsible for themselves, which implies fewer financial ceived stress associated with more general life situations responsibilities in comparison with older individuals who

292 IJOMEH 2020;33(3) BURNOUT AMONG POLISH FIREFIGHTERS ORIGINAL PAPER

are more likely to start a family. These relationships in example, in a study by Stanetić and Tešanovıć [13], the age the surveyed group of firefighters are presented in- Ta and work experience of doctors was associated with a high- ble 1, where it is clearly visible that the firefighters with er level of perceived stress and a greater risk of burnout. the fewest years of service are less likely to be married and Different results were obtained by Wang et al. [7], where have children (67% married and 91% without children) the older teachers in their study showed fewer symptoms compared to the firefighters with the longest duration of of professional burnout (emotional exhaustion) compared service (84% married and 94% with children). In such to the younger ones. These authors argued that this was situations, the psychological conflict concerning work in- influenced by the greater experience of older teachers, volvement vs. personal and family matters may occur with who are generally better at dealing with different profes- a significant frequency. sional situations, while younger teachers experience a dif- A study by Shreffler et al. [42], conducted on a group of ficult period of adaptation to new work situations. How- firefighters who were fathers, revealed the relationship ever, 2 main differences should be taken into account: between work overload, parental stress and the satisfac- the profession of a teacher differs from the medical or fire- tion with raising children. A study by Smith et al. [11] fighting profession, where in many situations the positive showed that both stress levels and the conflict arising from effects of work are noticeable immediately (e.g., healing, attempts to balance work vs. personal and family matters saving one’s life), while in the teaching profession, the ef- affected the level of occupational burnout. This, in turn, fects of education can be usually seen after many years. resulted in a lower number of activities that enhanced In addition, there may be some cultural differences in pro- the firefighters’ safety. fessional standards or working conditions in the teaching On the basis of the above literature, it was decided to per- profession [43]. form additional statistical analyses that could confirm or The number of years of service also had a positive impact reject, at least partly, these assumptions (Tables 5 and 6). on 2 aspects of professional burnout: relationship dete- The results showed that the subgroups of firefighters who rioration (LBQ-2) and disillusion (LBQ-4). Importantly, were married and had children experienced higher levels the author of the LBQ test, Santinello [36], assumes that of stress and elevated levels of 1 aspect of burnout, namely people with relatively short working hours are particularly disillusion (LBQ-4). On the one hand, this somewhat con- exposed to occupational burnout – due to the painful real- firms the above assumptions. On the other hand, it should ization that, especially early on in their careers, their ide- be noted that only 2 of the 5 variables studied were sig- alistic expectations prove very different from reality. Thus, nificantly higher, and these differences are not too large. the results obtained in these studies are in contradiction More discrete factors or variables not examined in this with the assumptions made by the author of LBQ. study might possibly play a role in this regard. The collect- As expected, self-efficacy in these studies had a negative ed data do not allow determination of more detailed issues effect on both the level of perceived stress and all 4 aspects related, e.g., to the financial situation of the firefighters’ of professional burnout. The identified direction of the im- families, the quality of their marriages, or other additional pact of this variable confirms previous research [21,23]. family and financial factors. The theories advanced by Lazarus and Folkman [44] pro- Results similar to those presented here have also appeared pose that, at the second phase of the second stress and in studies of other professional groups that are not so di- coping loop, there is a secondary appraisal concerning rectly exposed to threats to their own lives or health. For the individual’s own chances of dealing with a stressful

IJOMEH 2020;33(3) 293 ORIGINAL PAPER M. MAKARA-STUDZIŃSKA ET AL.

situation. Hence, the belief in self-efficacy may contribute may need to be supported in this respect, e.g., by dividing to the positive outcome of such an estimation (an indi- that responsibility between several employees and provid- vidual’s ability to cope with a difficult situation), and thus ing help to ensure a balance between work and family life. to the reduction in the level of experienced stress. It is also important to strengthen self-efficacy in individual Regarding occupational burnout, the greatest direct im- employees, which can prevent both the negative effects of pact of self-efficacy was noted in the lowering of the sense stress and professional burnout. The literature also de- of professional inefficacy (LBQ-3), followed by psycho- scribes one of the techniques to strengthen self-efficacy in physical exhaustion (LBQ-1), relationship deterioration individual employees, which can prevent both the negative (LBQ-2) and disillusion (LBQ-4). Thus, the relationship effects of stress and burnout [46]. To the best of the au- between generalized self-efficacy and a specific (profes- thors’ knowledge, there has been no research on the use of sional) sense of inefficacy was revealed. However, this such methods in a group of firefighters. association is not as strong as it could be expected. This Research into burnout therapy provides some possible is also visible in the result of the correlation presented in solutions. First of all, as in medicine, prevention is bet- Table 1 – although the direction of the relationship is con- ter than cure. It is, therefore, worth monitoring the level sistent with the predicted negative correlation, it is not too of burnout in firefighters and using preventive programs strong. This may indicate that the sense of professional that include, e.g., different ways of coping with stress [47]. efficacy may be influenced, toa large extent, by factors Second, it is likely that attempts to prevent a high level other than generalized self-efficacy. The generalized sense of occupational burnout will be most effective when tar- of self-efficacy, as shown in many studies, has a motiva- geted on both the following aspects: individual changes tional meaning and affects commitment and perseverance (e.g., a change of beliefs, an ability to relax, an ability to in actions that are undertaken [18,19,20,45]. This prob- take care of oneself, a healthy lifestyle) and organizational ably explains the impact on all dimensions of professional changes (in , holidays, proper management, burnout, and in particular on the reduced level of psycho- communication at work, etc.) [48]. Third, firefighters pre- physical exhaustion. In addition, the greater the degree senting the symptoms of occupational burnout syndrome of generalized self-efficacy, the smaller the likelihood of should pay particular to safety issues, as occupa- rejection of the people whom firefighters help, and of hos- tional burnout may contribute to the weakening of safety- tility and cynicism towards them [35]. related behaviors [11]. This study gives guidance on some remedial actions and further research. Further research on the detailed defini- Limitations tion of the content and the cause of emerging stress, as One of the limitations of the present study is the arbitrary well as that which accompanies direct interventions, is rec- division of employees into subgroups with a short dura- ommended. Various methodologies and analyses could be tion of service (0–3 years), a medium duration of service used in this field, to study diverse types of stress and job (4–8 years), a long duration of service (9–15 years), and strain, along with qualitative methods for the detection of a very long duration of service (>15 years), which was more discrete information. It would be possible to create introduced at the research planning stage. Also, the use work programs with individual employees as well as sys- of an ordinal scale limited the possibilities of statistical tem solutions. For example, employees with longer senior- analysis, and it would be advisable to use a ratio scale in ity, who take greater responsibility for the work of others, the future [49].

294 IJOMEH 2020;33(3) BURNOUT AMONG POLISH FIREFIGHTERS ORIGINAL PAPER

Another limitation outlined above is the use of PSS-10 3. Portero de la Cruz S, Vaquero Abellán M. Professional burn- which examines the level of perceived stress associ- out, stress and of staff at a univer- ated with more general life situations than the traumatic sity hospital. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015;23(3):543–52, stress resulting from exposure to extremely shocking https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.0284.2586. events [38,39]. Although many variables were included in 4. Wang Y, Ramos A, Wu H, Liu L, Yang X, Wang J, et al. Re- the study, others, such as family and financial issues, were lationship between occupational stress and burnout among not taken into account. Including them in the path analysis Chinese teachers: a cross-sectional survey in Liaoning, could have provided a more complete picture of the fac- China. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016;88(5):589–97, tors influencing and moderating burnout in firefighters. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0987-9. 5. Kumar S. Burnout and doctors: prevalence, prevention and CONCLUSIONS intervention. Healthcare. 2016;4(37):1–9, https://doi.org/10. The findings described here show interesting, though 3390/healthcare4030037. non-homogeneous, results. The results indicate that 6. Makara-Studzińska M, Załuski M, Tylec A, Panasiuk L. Do the number of interventions does not affect the level of Polish doctors suffer from occupational burnout syndrome? experienced stress or particular aspects of burnout. This An attempt to find an answer – Pilot study. Ann Agric Environ is inconsistent with both the intuitive understanding of Med. 2019;26(1):191–7, https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/105392. the problem and previous reports. It should be borne in 7. Wang Z, Liu H, Yu H, Wu Y, Chang S, Wang L. Associations mind that the scale used to measure stress was related to between occupational stress, burnout and well-being among the stress arising from everyday life, and not the traumatic manufacturing workers: Mediating roles of associated with exposure to acute, shocking events. capital and self-esteem. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):364, In addition, the research presented in this paper has https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1533-6. shown that the number of years of service has a positive ef- 8. Schaufeli WB, Peeters MCW. Job stress and burnout among fect on the level of experienced stress and on occupational correctional officers: A literature review. Int J Stress Manag. burnout. This direct impact manifests itself most signifi- 2000;7(1):19–48, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009514731657. cantly in 2 aspects of burnout: relationship deterioration 9. Mitani S, Fujita M, Nakata K, Shirakawa T. Impact of post- and disillusion. The sense of self-efficacy, as expected by traumatic stress disorder and job-related stress on burnout: the authors, had an impact both on reducing the sense of a study of fire service workers. J Emerg Med. 2006;31(1):7– stress and on all aspects of burnout. 11, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.08.008. 10. Katsavouni F, Bebetsos E, Malliou P, Beneka A. The rela- REFERENCES tionship between burnout, PTSD symptoms and injuries in 1. Ogińska-Bulik N, Kaflik-Pieróg M. [Work stress, self-efficacy firefighters. Occup Med. 2016;66(1):32–7, https://doi.org/ and work burnout syndrom among firefighters]. Acta Univ 10.1093/occmed/kqv144. Lodz Folia Psychol. 2003;7:37–47. 11. Smith TD, Hughes K, DeJoy DM, Dyal M-A. Assessment 2. Sattler DN, Boyd B, Kirsch J. Trauma-exposed firefighters: of relationships between work stress, work-family conflict, relationships among posttraumatic growth, posttraumatic burnout and firefighter safety behavior outcomes. Saf Sci. stress, resource availability, coping and critical incident stress 2018;103:287–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.005. debriefing experience. Stress Health. 2014;30(5):356–65, 12. Warr P. Age and occupational well-being. Psychol Aging. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2608. 1992;7(1):37–45, https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.7.1.37.

IJOMEH 2020;33(3) 295 ORIGINAL PAPER M. MAKARA-STUDZIŃSKA ET AL.

13. Stanetić K, Tešanovıć G. Influence of age and length of ser- 24. Kehl D, Knuth D, Hulse L, Schmidt S. Posttraumatic Reac- vice on the level of stress and burnout syndrome. Med Pregl. tions among Firefighters after Critical Incidents: Cross-Na- 2013;66(3–4):153–62. tional Data. J Aggress Maltreatment Trauma. 2014;23(8): 14. Brewer EW, Shepard L. Employee Burnout: A Meta-Anal- 842–53, https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2014.938143. ysis of the Relationship Between Age or Years of Experi- 25. Koniarek J, Dudek B. [Post-traumatic stress disorder ence. Hum Resour Dev Rev. 2004;3(2):102–23, https://doi. and firefighters’ attitude towards their job]. Med Pr. org/10.1177/1534484304263335. 2001;52(3):177–83. Polish. 15. Clark A, Oswald A, Warr P. Is job satisfaction U-shaped in 26. Ogińska-Bulik N, Langer I. [Type D personality and strat- age? J Occup Organ Psychol. 1996;69(1):57–81, https://doi. egies of dealing with stress, and intensification of PTSD org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00600.x. symptoms in the group of firefighters]. Med Pr. 2007;58(4): 16. Cherniss C. Role of professional self-efficacy in the etiology 307–16. Polish. and amelioration of burnout. In: Schaufeli WB, Maslach C, 27. Mockałło Z. [Posttraumatic stress in firefighting – review of Marek T, editors. Professional burnout: recent developments research]. Bezp Pr Nauk Prakt. 2009;6(453):2–5. Polish. in theory and research. London: Routledge; 2017. p. 135–49. 28. Ogińska-Bulik N. [Negative and positive effects of traumatic 17. Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: experiences in a group of emergency service workers – the role Prentice Hall; 1977. of personal and social resources]. Med Pr. 2013;64(4):463– 18. Bandura A. Cultivate Self-Efficacy for Personal and Orga- 72, https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.2013.0048. Polish. nizational Effectiveness. In: Locke EA, editor. Handbook 29. Witt M, Stelcer B, Czarnecka-Iwańczuk M. [Stress cop- of Principles of . Chichester: John ing styles in firemen exposed to severe stress]. Psychiatr. Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2009. p. 179–200. Pol. 2018;52(3):543–55, https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/73837. 19. Sawhney G, Jennings KS, Britt TW, Sliter MT. Occupational Polish. Stress and Symptoms: Examining the Mod- 30. Basinska B, Wiciak I. Fatigue and professional burnout in po- erating Effect of Work Recovery Strategies in Firefighters. lice officers and firefighters. Intern Security. 2012;2:265–74. J Occup Health Psychol. 2018;23(3):443–56, https://doi.org/ 31. Krok, D. Can Meaning Buffer Work Pressure? An Explor- 10.1037/ocp0000091. atory Study on Styles of Meaning in Life and Burnout in 20. Prati G, Pietrantoni L, Cicognani E. Self-Efficacy Moderates Firefighters. Arch Psychiatry Psychother. 2016;1:31–42, the Relationship between Stress Appraisal and Quality of Life https://doi.org/10.12740/APP/62154. among Rescue Workers. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010;23(4): 32. Ogińska-Bulik N, Kaflik-Pieróg M. [Occupational stress in 463–70, https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800903431699. emergency service]. Łódź: WSHE; 2006. Polish. 21. Dudek B, Koniarek J. Relationship between sense of coher- 33. National Fire Protection Association [Internet]. Quincy MA: ence and post-traumatic stress disorder symptom among fire- NFPA; 2018 [cited 2019 Jan 22]. Evarts B, Molis JL. U.S. fighters. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2000;13(4):229–305. Firefighter Injuries – 2017. Available from:https://www.nfpa. 22. Kaflik-Pieróg M, Ogińska-Bulik N. Occupational stress and org/-/media/Files/News-and-Research/Fire-statistics-and- health among Polish Profesional Firefighters. Sztuka Lecz. reports/Emergency-responders/osffinjuries.pdf. 2003;9(2):31–8. 34. U.S. Fire Administration [Internet]. Emmitsburg, MD: 23. Ogińska-Bulik N. [Occupational stress in social services pro- USFA; 2016 [cited 2017 May 22]. Firefighter fatalities in fessions. Sources – Consequences – Prevention]. Warsaw: the United States in 2015. Available from: https://www.usfa. Difin; 2006. fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/ff_fatalities_2015.pdf.

296 IJOMEH 2020;33(3) BURNOUT AMONG POLISH FIREFIGHTERS ORIGINAL PAPER

35. Santinello M. Link Burnout Questionnaire, Manual. Firen- 42. Shreffler KM, Meadows MP, Davis KD. Firefighting and ze: Organizzazioni Speciali; 2007. Fathering: Work-Family Conflict, Parenting Stress, and 36. Santinello M. [Link Burnout Questionnaire]. Warsaw: Labo- Satisfaction with Parenting and Child Behavior. Fathering. ratory of Psychological Tests of the Polish Psychological So- 2011;9(2):169–88, https://doi.org/10.3149/fth.0902.169. ciety; 2014. Polish. 43. Ho IT, Hau KT. Australian and Chinese teacher efficacy: 37. Jaworowska A. [Massimo Santinello Link Burnout Ques- Similarities and differences in personal instruction, disci- tionnaire. Polish normalisation]. Warsaw: Laboratory of pline, guidance efficacy and beliefs in external determinants. Psychological Tests of the Polish Psychological Society; 2014. Teach Teach Edu. 2004;20:313–23. Polish. 44. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New 38. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A Global Measure of York: Springer; 1984. Perceived Stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24(2):385–96, 45. Juczyński Z. [Self-Eficacy – Theory and Measurement]. Acta https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404. Univ Lodz Folia Psychol. 2000;4:11–24. Polish. 39. Juczyński Z, Ogińska-Bulik N. [Percived Stress Scale – PSS-10]. 46. Bresó E, Schaufeli WB, Salanova M. Can a Self-Efficacy- In: Juczyński Z, Ogińska-Bulik N, editors. [Tools for Measuring Based Intervention Decrease Burnout, Increase Engage- Stress and Coping with Stress]. Warsaw: Laboratory of Psycho- ment, and Enhance Performance? A Quasi-Experimental logical Tests of the Polish Psychological Society; 2009. p. 11–22. Study. High Educ. 2011;61:339–55. Polish. 47. Awa WL, Plaumann M, Walter U. Burnout prevention: 40. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. A review of intervention programs. Patient Educ Couns. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in 2010;78(2):184–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.04.008. health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control be- 48. Maricuţoiu LP, Sava FA, Butta O. The effectiveness of con- liefs. Windsor: NFER-NELSON; 1995. p. 35–7. trolled interventions on employees’ burnout: A meta-analy- 41. Juczyński Z. [General self-efficacy scale GSES]. In: Juczyń- sis. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2016;89(1):1–27, https://doi.org/ ski Z, editor. [Tools for Measuring in Health Promotion and 10.1111/joop.12099. Health Psychology]. Warsaw: Laboratory of Psychological 49. Brzeziński J. [Methodology of psychology research]. War- Tests of the Polish Psychological Society; 2012. p. 89–94. Polish. saw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2019. Polish.

This work is available in Open Access model and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Poland License – http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc/3.0/pl/deed.en.

IJOMEH 2020;33(3) 297