DOCSLIB.ORG

Part Iv Intentional Torts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part Iv Intentional Torts PART IV INTENTIONAL TORTS Chapter 12 Intentional Torts: The Prima Facie Case Introduction Intentional torts are among the oldest causes of must ordinarily find that the defendant subjectively action recognized in tort law. Although the intended to inflict a certain consequence upon the negligence principle has come to dominate tort plaintiff. It must be borne in mind that the plaintiff law, this is a relatively recent development, can rarely provide tangible proof of the defendant' s attributable in part to the importance of insurance state of mind other than by showing what the as a compensation mechanism,1 and in part to the defendant did, and asking the jury to infer his utility of the negligence test as a means of intent. The defendant can usually claim that the balancing competing social interests. Relatively injury to the plaintiff was accidental rather than little of the personal injury practice of modern intentional, and the plaintiff cannot offer an X-ray lawyers is taken up by intentional torts. However, of the defendant' s brain as proof. Nonetheless, the for a variety of reasons they figure prominently in jury must find as a fact (based upon their most law school torts courses. 2 Thus, most experience in the world and their common sense) students' education would be incomplete without an that the defendant' s conduct was intentional (or in understanding of intentional torts, despite the fact some cases highly reckless) rather than merely that they may never see one again, except careless before the legal requirements of the (possibly) on a bar exam. intentional tort are met. The unique thing about intentional torts is the Once the plaintiff has met his burden of proof, emphasis upon the defendant' s state of mind. the defendant can always claim that his conduct Whereas in the negligence case the jury is was "privileged" or justified, and thereby escape instructed to judge the defendant's conduct by an liability. objective standard, i.e., the hypothetical reasonably The "rules" governing intentional torts are prudent person, in intentional torts cases the jury relatively well settled; they are set forth in the RESTATEMENT (2D) OF TORTS. Their application, however, is often quite complex, as the succeeding 1 Insurance is important in part because it usually provides cases demonstrate. coverage only for "accidental" harms. Intentional torts are frequently excluded from coverage because they do not meet the requirement that the loss arise from an "occurrence," which is typically defined as "an accident RESTATEMENT (2D) OF TORTS or a happening ... which unexpectedly and unintentionally results in personal injury...." § 8A. Intent 2 One commonly cited reason is that the rules for intentional The word "intent" is used throughout the torts are relatively clear, and thus easier for the beginning student to understand and apply. Relative to product RESTATEMENT of this Subject to denote that the liability law, this statement is certainly true. actor desires to cause consequences of his act, or 12-2 INTENTIONAL TORTS: THE PRIMA FACIE CASE that he believes that the consequences are liable to the other for an apprehension caused substantially certain to result from it. thereby although the act involves an unreasonable risk of causing it and, therefore, would be § 13. Battery: Harmful Contact negligent or reckless if the risk threatened bodily harm. An actor is subject to liability to another for battery if § 35. False Imprisonment (a) he acts intending to cause a harmful or (1) An actor is subject to liability to another for offensive contact with the person of the other false imprisonment if or a third person, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and (a) he acts intending to confine the other or a third person within boundaries fixed by the (b) a harmful contact with the person of the actor, and other directly or indirectly results (b) his act directly or indirectly results in such § 15. What Constitutes Bodily Harm a confinement of the other, and Bodily harm is any physical impairment of the (c) the other is conscious of the confinement or condition of another's body, or physical pain or is harmed by it. illness. (2) An act which is not done with the intention stated in Subsection (1, a) does not make the actor § 18. Battery: Offensive Contact liable to the other for a merely transitory or otherwise harmless confinement, although the act (1) An actor is subject to liability to another for involves an unreasonable risk of imposing it and battery if therefore would be negligent or reckless if the risk (a) he acts intending to cause a harmful or threatened bodily harm. offensive contact with the person of the other or a third person, or an imminent apprehension § 36. What Constitutes Confinement of such a contact, and (1) To make the actor liable for false (b) an offensive contact with the person of the imprisonment, the other' s confinement within the other directly or indirectly results. boundaries fixed by the actor must be complete. (2) An act which is not done with the intention (2) The confinement is complete although there is stated in Subsection (1,a) does not make the actor a reasonable means of escape, unless the other liable to the other for a mere offensive contact with knows of it. the other' s person although the act involves an unreasonable risk of inflicting it and, therefore, (3) The actor does not become liable for false would be negligent or reckless if the risk imprisonment by intentionally preventing another threatened bodily harm. from going in a particular direction in which he has a right or privilege to go. § 21. Assault § 46. Outrageous Conduct Causing Severe (1) An actor is subject to liability to another for Emotional Distress assault if (1) One who by extreme and outrageous conduct (a) he acts intending to cause a harmful or intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional offensive contact with the person of the other distress to another is subject to liability for such or a third person, or an imminent apprehension emotional distress, and if bodily harm to the other of such a contact, and results from it, for such bodily harm. (b) the other is thereby put in such imminent (2) Where such conduct is directed at a third apprehension. person, the actor is subject to liability if he (2) An act which is not done with the intention intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional stated in Subsection (1, a) does not make the actor distress RESTATEMENT (2D) OF TORTS INTENTIONAL TORTS: THE PRIMA FACIE CASE 12-3 (a) to a member of such person' s immediate (a) the other is about to inflict upon him an family who is present at the time, whether or intentional contact or other bodily harm, and not such distress results in bodily harm, or that (b) to any other person who is present at the (b) he is thereby put in peril of death or time, if such distress results in bodily harm. serious bodily harm or ravishment, which can be safely be prevented only by the immediate § 63. Self-Defense by Force not Threatening use of such force. Death or Serious Bodily Harm (2) The privilege stated in Subsection (1) exists (1) An actor is privileged to use reasonable force, although the actor correctly or reasonably believes not intended or likely to cause death or serious that he can safely avoid the necessity of so bodily harm, to defend himself against defending himself by unprivileged harmful or offensive contact or other (a) retreating if he is attacked within his bodily harm which he reasonably believes that dwelling place, which is not also the dwelling another is about to inflict intentionally upon him. place of the other, or (2) Self-defense is privileged under the conditions (b) permitting the other to intrude upon or stated in Subsection (1), although the actor dispossess him of his dwelling place, or correctly or reasonably believes that he can avoid (c) abandoning an attempt to effect a lawful the necessity of so defending himself, arrest. (a) by retreating or otherwise giving up a right (3) The privilege stated in Subsection (1) does not or privilege, or exist if the actor correctly or reasonably believes (b) by complying with a command with which that he can with complete safety avoid the necessity the actor is under no duty to comply or which of so defending himself by the other is not privileged to enforce by the (a) retreating if attacked in any place other means threatened. than his dwelling place, or in a place which is also the dwelling of the other, or § 65. Self-Defense by Force Threatening Death or Serious Bodily Harm (b) relinquishing the exercise of any right or privilege other than his privilege to prevent (1) Subject to the statement in Subsection (3), an intrusion upon or dispossession of his dwelling actor is privileged to defend himself against place or to effect a lawful arrest. another by force intended or likely to cause death or serious bodily harm, when he reasonably believes that § A. Battery and Assault Introductory Note. In Dickens v. Puryear, ROGERS v. LOEWS L'ENFANT PLAZA already considered in Chapter Seven, there is a HOTEL good introduction to the general requirements of 526 F. Supp. 523 (D.C. D.C. 1981) battery and assault. Joyce Hens GREEN, District Judge Plaintiff, Norma Rogers, alleges in her complaint that while employed by the defendant Loews L' Enfant Plaza Hotel (Hotel) she was subjected to physical and emotional harassment by her superiors. Claiming that defendants' conduct has deprived her of rights guaranteed under the ROGERS v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multilateral Peace Operations and the Challenges of Organized Crime
    SIPRI Background Paper February 2018 MULTILATERAL PEACE PROJECT SUMMARY w The New Geopolitics of Peace OPERATIONS AND THE Operations III: Non‑traditional Security Challenges initiative CHALLENGES OF was launched with support from the Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland, co‑sponsored ORGANIZED CRIME by Ethiopia, and in continued partnership with the Friedrich‑ jaÏr van der lijn Ebert‑Stiftung (FES). This phase of the initiative seeks to enhance understanding I. Introduction about peace operations and non‑traditional security Multilateral peace operations are increasingly confronting a set of challenges such as terrorism interrelated and mutually reinforcing security challenges that are relatively and violent extremism, new to them, that do not respect borders, and that have causes and effects irregular migration, piracy, which cut right across the international security, peacebuilding and organized crime and environmental degradation. It development agendas.1 Organized crime provides one of the most prominent aims to identify the various examples of these ‘non-traditional’ security challenges.2 perceptions, positions and There are many different definitions of organized crime depending on the interests of the relevant context, sector and organization. The United Nations Convention against stakeholders, as well as to Transnational Organized Crime defines an ‘organized criminal group’ as stimulate open dialogue, ‘a structured group of three or more persons, existing for a period of time cooperation and mutual and acting in concert with the aim of committing one or more serious crimes understanding by engaging key or offences . in order to obtain, directly or indirectly, a financial or other stakeholders and mapping the material benefit’.3 However, this definition is not unchallenged.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Peace at the Nexus of Organized Crime, Conflict and Violent
    PolicyFBA Brief Brief 01/2015 BUILDING PEACE AT THE NEXUS OF ORGANIZED CRIME, CONFLICT, AND VIOLENT EXTREMISM INTERNATIONAL EXPERT FORUM ON TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY PEACE-BUILDING BY: CHRISTIAN ALTPETER Organized crime, armed conflict and violent extremism are all becoming increasingly intertwined. Fragility, weak institutions and conflicts provide an attractive environment and breeding ground for illicit networks and extremist organizations and these connected groups can seriously impede peace-building efforts and threaten human security. SUMMARY › Organized crime, conflict, and violent extremism all thrive when any state is weak or its structure is absent. Where there is a lack of security, a want of access to justice, and poor service provision, then organized crime often fills the void by taking over certain functions of the state. › Traditionally, crime and violent extremism have not formed a part of the peace-building agenda but instead have been treated as separate matters for law enforcement strategies. › Dealing with organized crime and violent extremism in countries and societies emerging from conflict requires a multidimen- sional peace-building approach that includes the perpetrators of organized crime and those involved in armed conflict and violent extremism. UN Security Council mandates for peacekeeping operations must be so arranged that they include the fight against organized crime. › Strengthening social cohesion and inclusiveness, trust and legitimacy of the government concerned and its institutions must be at the centre of peace-building strategies, together with realizable peace dividends. › The UN, the EU and other actors must meet such challenges with comprehensive policies and approaches because military, diplomatic or police methods alone will not suffice.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxic Trespass: Lead Us Not Into Litigation
    toxic trespass: lead us not into litigation 44 by Steven N. Geise and Hollis R. Peterson Since the chemical revolution began to unfold in the 1950s, people have ingested hundreds of toxic substances—knowingly or not. Our bodies carry chemicals found in the products and processes we use or to which we are exposed. Many toxins take up residence in body fat, where they may remain for decades; others are absorbed into the body and quickly metabolized and excreted. Winds and water currents can carry persistent chemicals thousands of miles until they find a home in our blood- streams. Just by living in an industrialized society, we all carry a sampling of the chem- ical cocktail created by our surroundings. As modern science advances, biomonitor- ing data is able to detect the presence of specific toxins. But science cannot always inform us about how the chemi- cals were introduced, how long they have been there, or whether they pose a legiti- mate health risk. If not for recent develop- ments in detection, we might never know that our bodies harbor such chemicals. 55 Nevertheless, creative litigants are forcing courts to deal with (“CELDF”) has proposed a strict-liability model ordinance to a new wave of toxic tort claims seeking to make chemicals local legislators that recognizes “that it is an inviolate, funda- in a person’s bloodstream an actionable offense. This cause mental, and inalienable right of each person … to be free from of action is known as “toxic trespass.” Courts must decide involuntary invasions of their bodies by corporate chemicals.” whether the mere presence of chemicals in an individual Corporate Chemical Trespass Ordinance, http://www.celdf.org/ gives rise to civil liability when the individual has no diag- Ordinances/CorporateChemicalTrespassOrdinance/tabid/257/ nosed injury and the causal link between the exposure and Default.aspx (web sites last visited February 6, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Of Rescue and Report: Should Tort Law Impose a Duty to Help Endangered Persons Or Abused Children? Marc A
    Santa Clara Law Review Volume 40 | Number 4 Article 3 1-1-2000 Of Rescue and Report: Should Tort Law Impose a Duty to Help Endangered Persons or Abused Children? Marc A. Franklin Matthew loP eger Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Marc A. Franklin and Matthew Ploeger, Symposium, Of Rescue and Report: Should Tort Law Impose a Duty to Help Endangered Persons or Abused Children?, 40 Santa Clara L. Rev. 991 (2000). Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol40/iss4/3 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Santa Clara Law Review by an authorized administrator of Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OF RESCUE AND REPORT: SHOULD TORT LAW IMPOSE A DUTY TO HELP ENDANGERED PERSONS OR ABUSED CHILDREN? Marc A. Franklin* & Matthew Ploeger** I. INTRODUCTION This essay explores whether a civil duty to rescue' should be imposed on a person who has the apparent ability to save another person or to prevent that person from entering a po- sition of peril.2 It also examines the related question of * Frederick I. Richman Professor, Stanford Law School. LL.B., Cornell Law School; A.B., Cornell University. A version of this essay was presented at the Santa Clara Law Review Symposium, Law, Ethics, and the Good Samari- tan, held at Santa Clara University School of Law on March 24, 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: an Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1987 The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: An Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines Alan O. Sykes Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Alan O. Sykes, "The Boundaries of Vicarious Liability: An Economic Analysis of the Scope of Employment Rule and Related Legal Doctrines," 101 Harvard Law Review 563 (1987). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME 101 JANUARY 1988 NUMBER 3 HARVARD LAW REVIEW1 ARTICLES THE BOUNDARIES OF VICARIOUS LIABILITY: AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT RULE AND RELATED LEGAL DOCTRINES Alan 0. Sykes* 441TICARIOUS liability" may be defined as the imposition of lia- V bility upon one party for a wrong committed by another party.1 One of its most common forms is the imposition of liability on an employer for the wrong of an employee or agent. The imposition of vicarious liability usually depends in part upon the nature of the activity in which the wrong arises. For example, if an employee (or "servant") commits a tort within the ordinary course of business, the employer (or "master") normally incurs vicarious lia- bility under principles of respondeat superior. If the tort arises outside the "scope of employment," however, the employer does not incur liability, absent special circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Bougainville Peace Agreement >> Table of Contents >> Bougainville Peace Agreement
    Peace Agreements Digital Collection Bougainville Peace Agreement >> Table of Contents >> Bougainville Peace Agreement Bougainville Peace Agreement Signed at Arawa 30 August 2001 Introduction and Outline This agreement is a joint creation by the Government of the Independent State of Papua New Guinea and Leaders representing the people of Bougainville ("the Parties") to resolve the Bougainville conflict and to secure a lasting peace by peaceful means. It is intended to further the objectives of The Burnham Truce, the Lincoln and Ceasefire Agreements and other agreements and understandings between the parties. This Agreement will be implemented through consultation and co-operation, and will form the basis for drafting constitutional amendments and other laws in order to give legal effect to this Agreement. The Bougainville Parties will work through the autonomous Bougainville Government when it is formed. The Agreement has three pillars. They are as follows. 1. Autonomy The Agreement provides for arrangements for an autonomous Bougainville Government operating under a home-grown Bougainville Constitution with a right to assume increasing control over a wide range of powers, functions, personnel and resources on the basis of guarantees contained in the National Constitution. 2. Referendum The agreement provides for the right, guaranteed in the National Constitution, for a referendum among Bougainvilleans’ on Bougainville’s future political status. The choices available in the referendum will include a separate independence for Bougainville. The referendum will be held no sooner than ten years, and in any case no later than fifteen years, after the election of the autonomous Bougainville Government. The actual date of the referendum will be set taking account of standards of good governance and the implementation of the weapons disposal plan.
    [Show full text]
  • World Peace Through Law
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 2 Number 1 Spring Article 3 May 2020 World Peace through Law Charles Rhyne Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Charles Rhyne, World Peace through Law, 2 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 1 (1972). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Denver Sturm College of Law at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],dig- [email protected]. WORLD PEACE THROUGH LAW CHARLES RHYNE* In view of the realities of today's world, man cannot live in isolation if he expects to live in peace. The world situation must be everyone's concern; each of us must act, collectively and individually if we are to avoid the total destruction which threatens world peace. We live in a world all of us know more about, think more about and worry more about than ever before. Age old bar- riers of time and distance are gone; the lives of all peoples are inextricably intertwined. For instance: international trade was affected by the United States' enactment of a 10'/; surcharge on imports; the outbreak of war between India and Pakistan in December, 1971 affected everyone almost immediately as has the continuation of the Middle East conflict; states and peoples will be vastly affected by China's presence in the U.N. Since no one nation can by itself control drugs, money, en- vironment, pollution, weather, airplane hi-jacking, poverty, hunger, disease and many other subjects of considerable con- cern to the world community, transnational cooperation has be- come, in fact, a necessity.
    [Show full text]
  • Warmsley Cornellgrad 0058F 1
    ON THE DETECTION OF HATE SPEECH, HATE SPEAKERS AND POLARIZED GROUPS IN ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Dana Warmsley December 2017 c 2017 Dana Warmsley ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ON THE DETECTION OF HATE SPEECH, HATE SPEAKERS AND POLARIZED GROUPS IN ONLINE SOCIAL MEDIA Dana Warmsley, Ph.D. Cornell University 2017 The objective of this dissertation is to explore the use of machine learning algorithms in understanding and detecting hate speech, hate speakers and po- larized groups in online social media. Beginning with a unique typology for detecting abusive language, we outline the distinctions and similarities of dif- ferent abusive language subtasks (offensive language, hate speech, cyberbully- ing and trolling) and how we might benefit from the progress made in each area. Specifically, we suggest that each subtask can be categorized based on whether or not the abusive language being studied 1) is directed at a specific individ- ual, or targets a generalized “Other” and 2) the extent to which the language is explicit versus implicit. We then use knowledge gained from this typology to tackle the “problem of offensive language” in hate speech detection. A key challenge for automated hate speech detection on social media is the separation of hate speech from other instances of offensive language. We present a Logistic Regression classifier, trained on human annotated Twitter data, that makes use of a uniquely derived lexicon of hate terms along with features that have proven successful in the detection of offensive language, hate speech and cyberbully- ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Imposed in Intentional Torts Suits Defendant Are at Fault
    Using Comparative Fault to Replace the All-or-Nothing Lottery Imposed in Intentional Torts Suits in Which Both Plaintiff and Defendant Are at Fault Gail D. Hollister* I. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 122 II. REASONS FOR USING COMPARATIVE FAULT IN INTENTIONAL TORT CASES ............................................ 127 III. JUSTIFICATIONS OFFERED TO SUPPORT THE BLANKET PROHI- BITION ON THE USE OF COMPARATIVE FAULT IN INTEN- TIONAL TORT CASES ..................................... 132 A. Plaintiff's Fault Must Be Ignored to Circumvent the Harsh Results Imposed by Contributory Negli- gence ......................................... 132 B. Comparative Negligence Statutes Prohibit the Use of Comparative Fault in Intentional Tort Cases.. 134 C. Intent and Negligence Are Different in Kind and Thus Cannot Be Compared ..................... 135 1. Do Negligence and Intent Differ in Kind? .. 136 2. Do Differences in Kind Mandate Different R esults? .... 141 D. Plaintiff Is Entitled to Full Compensation....... 143 E. Plaintiff Has No Duty to Act Reasonably to Avoid H arm ......................................... 143 F. Plaintiff's Fault Cannot Be a Proximate Cause of H er Injury .................................... 144 G. The Need to Punish Defendant Precludes the Use of Comparative Fault .......................... 145 * Associate Professor of Law, Fordham University. B.S., University of Wisconsin, 1967; J.D., Fordham University School of Law, 1970. The author would like to thank Professors Helen Hadjiyannakis Bender, Robert M. Byrn, and Ludwik A. Teclaff for their helpful comments on earlier drafts. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW [Vol. 46:121 H. The Need to Deter Substandard Conduct Makes Comparative Fault Undesirable................. 146 L Victim Compensation Militates Against the Use of Comparative Fault ............................ 149 IV. WHEN COMPARATIVE FAULT SHOULD BE USED IN INTEN- TIONAL TORT CASES ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Remedies for Sexual Assault
    Civil Remedies for Sexual Assault ________________ A Report prepared for the British Columbia Law Institute by its Project Committee on Civil Remedies for Sexual Assault _______________ The members of the Project Committee are: Professor John McLaren - Chair Megan Ellis Dr. Roy O’Shaughnessy Etel Swedahl Professor Christine Boyle Arthur L. Close, Q.C. (Executive Director, BCLI) Jennifer Koshan - Reporter BCLI Report No. 14 June, 2001 British Columbia Law Institute 1822 East Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6T 1Z1 Voice: (604) 822-0142 Fax:(604) 822-0144 E-mail: [email protected] WWW: http://www.bcli.org ----------------------------------------------- The British Columbia Law Institute was created in 1997 by incorporation under the Provincial Society Act. Its mission is to: (a) promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its adaptation to modern social needs, (b) promote improvement of the administration of justice and respect for the rule of law, and (c) promote and carry out scholarly legal research. The Institute is the effective successor to the Law Reform Commission of British Columbia which ceased operations in 1997. ----------------------------------------------- The members of the Institute Board are: Thomas G. Anderson Trudi Brown, Q.C. Arthur L. Close, Q.C. (Executive Director) Prof. Keith Farquhar Sholto Hebenton, Q.C Ravi. R. Hira, Q.C. Prof. Hester Lessard Prof. James MacIntyre, Q.C.(Treasurer) Ann McLean (Vice-chair) Douglas Robinson, Q.C. Gregory Steele (Chair) Etel R. Swedahl Kim Thorau Gordon Turriff (Secretary) ----------------------------------------------- The British Columbia Law Institute gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Law Foundation of British Columbia in carrying out its work.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revolutionary Approach to the Eggshell Plaintiff Rule Steve Calandrillo University of Washington School of Law
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by UW Law Digital Commons (University of Washington) University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Articles Faculty Publications 2013 Eggshell Economics: A Revolutionary Approach to the Eggshell Plaintiff Rule Steve Calandrillo University of Washington School of Law Dustin E. Buehler Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Steve Calandrillo and Dustin E. Buehler, Eggshell Economics: A Revolutionary Approach to the Eggshell Plaintiff Rule, 74 Ohio St. L.J. 375 (2013), https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/130 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Eggshell Economics: A Revolutionary Approach to the Eggshell Plaintiff Rule STEVE P. CALANDRILLO* & DUSTIN E. BUEHLER† For more than a century, courts have universally applied the eggshell plaintiff rule, which holds tortfeasors liable for the full extent of the harm inflicted on vulnerable “eggshell” victims. Liability attaches even when the victim’s condition and the scope of her injuries were completely unforeseeable ex ante. This Article explores the implications of this rule by providing a pioneering economic analysis of eggshell liability. It argues that the eggshell plaintiff rule misaligns parties’ incentives in a socially undesirable way. The rule subjects injurers to unfair surprise, fails to incentivize socially optimal behavior when injurers have imperfect information about expected accident losses, and fails to account for risk aversion, moral hazard, and judgment-proof problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Penal Code Offenses by Punishment Range Office of the Attorney General 2
    PENAL CODE BYOFFENSES PUNISHMENT RANGE Including Updates From the 85th Legislative Session REV 3/18 Table of Contents PUNISHMENT BY OFFENSE CLASSIFICATION ........................................................................... 2 PENALTIES FOR REPEAT AND HABITUAL OFFENDERS .......................................................... 4 EXCEPTIONAL SENTENCES ................................................................................................... 7 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 4 ................................................................................................. 8 INCHOATE OFFENSES ........................................................................................................... 8 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 5 ............................................................................................... 11 OFFENSES AGAINST THE PERSON ....................................................................................... 11 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 6 ............................................................................................... 18 OFFENSES AGAINST THE FAMILY ......................................................................................... 18 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 7 ............................................................................................... 20 OFFENSES AGAINST PROPERTY .......................................................................................... 20 CLASSIFICATION OF TITLE 8 ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]