Knox Land for Business Background Report - September 2017 Update
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Submission Cover Sheets
Submission Cover Sheet North East Link Project EES IAC 402 Request to be heard?: No, but please email me th Full Name: Phil Turner Organisation: Maroondah City Council Affected property: Attachment 1: Maroondah_Coun Attachment 2: Maroondah_Coun Attachment 3: Comments: To the North East Link Inquiry & Advisory Committee (IAC) Maroondah Council provides the following submission to the IAC, in relation to the EES for the North East Link project. While Council formally supports the objectives of the NEL project, I advise that the support of Maroondah Council has been conditional on appropriate traffic considerations being made with regard to the impact of the project on the Eastlink tunnels, the Ringwood Bypass and by extension the Ringwood Metropolitan Activity Centre. Council previously commissioned a review by O’Brien Traffic that considered the project in the context of the tunnels and impacts on Ringwood, and it was determined that without ancillary works to take traffic pressure off the Eastlink tunnels and the Ringwood Bypass, the project would potentially fail and have a major detrimental impact on the viability of the Ringwood Metropolitan Activity Centre. The O’Brien Traffic report attached to this submission details the basis for those concerns. Council’s concerns were previously forwarded to NELA and Council officers have met with NELA officers on these matters, however, to date Council has not received an appropriate response that addresses these concerns, including within the ESS. In support of this submission, the following documents have also been uploaded: o A submission letter signed by Council’s Mayor Rob Steane documenting the history of Council’s dealings regarding NEL, and outlining Council’s concerns current with the project; o Council Report September 2018; o O’Brien Traffic Review dated 12 September 2017; o Council letter to NELA (26 February 2018) and NELA response (14 March 2018); o Correspondence from Council on Bypass concerns (including technical reports); and o Minutes from MCC / NELA meetings 6 April 2018 and 30 April 2018. -
Our Asset Management Journey
Our Asset Management Journey Professor Sujeeva Setunge Deputy Dean, Research and Innovation School of Engineering 1 RMIT Journey in Infrastructure Asset Management • Central Asset Management System (CAMS) for Buildings • CAMS-Drainage • Disaster resilience of bridges, culverts and floodways • CAMS-Bridges • Automated Tree inventory using airborne LiDar and Aerial imagery • Intelligent Asset Management in Community Partnership – A smart cities project • Future cities CRC – New!! 2 CAMS for Buildings CAMS Mobile • Australian Research council grant in partnership with – MAV – City of Glen Eira – City of Kingston – City of greater Dandenong – Mornington Peninsula shire – City of Monash – City of Brimbank • State government grant to develop the cloud hosted platform • City of Melbourne investment to develop practical features such as backlog, scenario analysis, risk profile • RMIT University property services and City of Melbourne – CAMS Mobile inspection app 3 CAMS for Buildings - Features 1. Database management 2. Data exploration 3. Deterioration prediction 4. Budget calculation 5. Backlog estimation 6. Risk management 4 4 RMIT University©2015 CAMS clients Property Services Australia | Vietnam 5 CAMS TECHNOLOGY - Buildings Current Capability Research In Progress Next stage Data Driven Models for Multi-objective . Cross assets CAMS 700 components Decision Making . Augmented Cost and other input Life-Cycle Physical degradation Reality Scenarios Analysis Modelling modelling – improve . Emergency Risk-cost Relationship accuracy manageme -
7.5. Final Outcomes of 2020 General Valuation
Council Meeting Agenda 24/08/2020 7.5 Final outcomes of 2020 General Valuation Abstract This report provides detailed information in relation to the 2020 general valuation of all rateable property and recommends a Council resolution to receive the 1 January 2020 General Valuation in accordance with section 7AF of the Valuation of Land Act 1960. The overall movement in property valuations is as follows: Site Value Capital Improved Net Annual Value Value 2019 Valuations $82,606,592,900 $112,931,834,000 $5,713,810,200 2020 Valuations $86,992,773,300 $116,769,664,000 $5,904,236,100 Change $4,386,180,400 $3,837,830,000 $190,425,800 % Difference 5.31% 3.40% 3.33% The level of value date is 1 January 2020 and the new valuation came into effect from 1 July 2020 and is being used for apportioning rates for the 2020/21 financial year. The general valuation impacts the distribution of rating liability across the municipality. It does not provide Council with any additional revenue. The distribution of rates is affected each general valuation by the movement in the various property classes. The important point from an equity consideration is that all properties must be valued at a common date (i.e. 1 January 2020), so that all are affected by the same market. Large shifts in an individual property’s rate liability only occurs when there are large movements either in the value of a property category (e.g. residential, office, shops, industrial) or the value of certain locations, which are outside the general movements in value across all categories or locations. -
Minutes 20181212
MeBUG Committee meeting Minutes Date/time: 13 December 2018, 7.30 pm Venue; Elaine Hopper’s home, 33 Amery Avenue Blackburn 1. Present David Simm (DS), Elaine Hopper (EH), David Blom (DB), Scott Green (SG), Michael Hassett (MH). 2. Approve Minutes of previous ordinary meeting, 19 April Approved 3. Outstanding Actions from above? Dealt with below 4. Treasurer’s report (e) Balance as at 10 December 2018, $1361.17. Full details in Attachment 1. (f) Michael requested approval to upgrade website to include email and other cloud document storage, additional cost $55 per year. Agreed (g) Further polite reminder next month to the few (currently six) members yet to renew. (EH) 5. Project Review (as on website) (a) Box Hill to Ringwood Shared Path I. Recent correspondence between DS and VicRoads - refer Attachment 2 II. Write to WCC (copied to new MPs for Box Hill and Ringwood) urging considerations of safer options than the proposal to route the path along the Laburnum St roadway shared with road traffic. {MH} III. Harvey Norman Lane: In light of refusal of WCC officers to assist with ownership details, go to Titles Office and request details be searched (on line facility has been tried unsuccessfully). (MH) IV. Continue approaches as regards McGlone St and Richards St. (DS) V. Chase up VicRoads regarding dogs on leash signs. (MH) (b) Healesville Freeway Reserve i. Write to Shaun Leans regarding next stage of community consultation (MH) ii. Reach out to HFR Friends and broach the idea of the bridge over the Dell (DS) (c) Heatherdale to Syndal Pipe Reserve i. -
Knox Central Structure Plan
APPENDIX A Knox Central Structure Plan FINAL DRAFT VERSION 6 (FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION) OCTOBER 2017 ‘Knox Central – Capital of the East’ Document Register Version Purpose Date of Issue 1 Draft for consultation with Knox Central Advisory Committee 27 June 2016 2 Draft for Public Exhibition – for consideration by Council 13 September 2016 3 Draft for Public Exhibition – endorsed by Council 13 September 2016 4 Draft including recommended post-exhibition changes 27 March 2017 – for consideration by Council 5 Draft including recommended post-exhibition changes (Updates to 27 March 2017 Figures 14,15 and 23 only) – endorsed by Council 6 Final Draft for consideration by Council 09 October 2017 CONTENTS INTRODUCING KNOX CENTRAL .................................................................... 2 2 THE SETTING ...................................................................................... 4 Part THE STRUCTURE PLAN ............................................................................. 7 VISION AND STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ............................................................. 11 THE STRATEGIC RESPONSE ........................................................................ 14 PRECINCT PLAN ................................................................................... 30 PRECINCT OBJECTIVES AND VISION ............................................................... 31 BUILT FORM GUIDELINES ......................................................................... 33 BUILT FORM FRAMEWORK – PREFERRED BUILDING HEIGHTS ..................................... -
Knox Housing Strategy 2015, Knox City Council, 2015
Knox City Council acknowledges the traditional custodians of the City of Knox, the Wurundjeri and Bunurong people of the Kulin Nation. Contents What is the Knox Housing Strategy 2015? ....................................................................................... 5 Executive summary ..................................................................................................................... 5 What’s important to Knox people? ................................................................................................. 8 Knox@50 .................................................................................................................................... 8 Knox Vision: Our City Our Future .............................................................................................. 10 Knox City Plan 2013-2017 .......................................................................................................... 11 Housing in Knox ............................................................................................................................. 13 Why plan for housing? ............................................................................................................... 13 What is Council’s role? ............................................................................................................... 15 How does the strategy implement Plan Melbourne? .................................................................. 16 Planning for the Future: Knox Housing Strategy 2015 ................................................................... -
Vicroads Annual Report 2016-2017
VicRoads Annual 2016 Report –17 Connecting our communities vie roads TRAHSPORT FO~ORIA Published by: VicRoads 60 Denmark St, Kew Vic 3101 September 2017 Also published at vicroads.vic.gov.au © Copyright State of Victoria (VicRoads) 2017 You are free to re-use this work under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence, provided you credit the State of Victoria (VicRoads) as author, indicate if changes were made and comply with the other licence terms. The licence does not apply to any branding, including Government logos. Language: English International Standards Serial Number (ISSN): 1832-0732 VicRoads publication identification number 02926 Printed on Revive Laser 100% recycled paper Table of contents Chief Executive’s Message 1 Section 1: Year in review 3 Vision and values 3 Manner of establishment and relevant ministers 5 Nature and range of services provided 5 Departmental objectives, indicators and progress 7 Highlights and key achievements: performance against output performance measures 8 Operational and budgetary objectives and performance against those objectives 10 Key financial results 41 Section 2: Governance and organisational structure 49 Section 3: Workforce data 55 Employment and conduct principles 55 Comparative workforce data 56 Diversity and inclusion commitment 58 Section 4: Other disclosures 61 Local jobs first — Victorian Industry Participation Policy (VIPP) 61 Disclosure of government advertising expenditure 62 Consultancy expenditure 62 Disclosure of Information and Communication Technology expenditure 62 Disclosure -
Whitehorse Open Space Strategy
Whitehorse Open Space Strategy Part Two Precinct recommendations Prepared by THOMPSON BERRILL LANDSCAPE DESIGN PTY LTD in association with ENVIRONMENT & LAND MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ADOPTED BY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 19 2007 Table of contents PART ONE Background and overall strategy recommendations (refer to separate volume, pages 1 to 126) PART TWO Precinct Recommendations Page No. GLOSSARY 11 INTRODUCTION PART TWO 127 12. BLACKBURN 128 12.1 Overview 128 12.1.1 Suburb description 129 12.1.2 Heritage values of open space in Blackburn 129 12.1.3. Demographic summary for Blackburn 129 12.1.4 Open space summary for Blackburn 130 12.1.5 Summary of open space reserves and classification 131 12.2 Existing open space distribution 132 12.3 Community use of open space 133 12.4 Summary of anticipated future change in Blackburn 134 12.5 Open space quality and design 135 12.6 Blackburn precinct recommendations 136 12.7 Individual reserve recommendations for Blackburn 138 13 BLACKBURN NORTH 140 13.1 Overview 140 13.1.1 Suburb description 140 13.1.2 Heritage values of open space in Blackburn North 141 13.1.3. Demographic summary for Blackburn North 141 13.1.4 Open space summary for Blackburn North 142 13.1.5 Summary of open space reserves and classification 142 13.2 Existing open space distribution 143 13.3 Community use of open space 143 13.4 Summary of anticipated future change in Blackburn North 145 13.5 Open space quality and design 146 13.6 Blackburn North precinct recommendations 146 13.7 Individual reserve recommendations for Blackburn North 147 14 BLACKBURN SOUTH 149 14.1 Overview 149 14.1.1 Suburb description 149 WHITEHORSE OPEN SPACE STRATEGY PART TWO NOVEMBER 19 2007 PAGE i PART TWO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. -
Property Victoria
DEPARTMENT OF SUSTAINABILITY AND ENVIRONMENT Property Victoria January 2003 edition 02 Melbourne’s commercial property up $3.4 in this edition billion 01 he heart of Victoria's commercial Apart from Melbourne, the other high melbourne commercial property up Tindustry jumped in value by $3.4 performing major municipality was billion over the past two years. Glen Eira, reporting a 57.5% growth $3.4 billion in the value of its combined Melbourne’s commercial property jumps in value Commercial property in the City of commercial and industrial property. Melbourne is now valued at $15.8 billion compared with $12.4 billion in Commercial and industrial property in kingston leads industrial value 2000. Victoria is worth $86.7 billion Victoria’s top industrial municipality goes further according to Revaluation 2002 ahead This 27% increase - according to figures. But that is only a fraction of Municipal Revaluation 2002 reports the total value of the state’s property 02 submitted to the Valuer-General which was worth $557 billion. Victoria - shows that commercial commercial and industrial values property is the City of Melbourne's 2002 compared to 2000 fastest growing property type. shifts in value across the state The statewide increase in commercial (by municipality) compared to last revaluation property (Capital Improved Value CIV) reported under Revaluation 2002 was 03 - 04 20.2% compared with the overall statewide property CIV increase of commercial and industrial % 26.7%. changes to CIV graphs illustrating % changes across the state Top 5 commercial property by Top 5 commercial and industrial (by municipality) compared to last revaluation municipality by municipality 05 1. -
609-621 Burwood Highway Expert Opinion on Stormwater Management Strategy for Fast Track Government Land Service
Evidenced by Glenn Ottrey requested by Development Victoria 609-621 Burwood Highway Expert opinion on stormwater management strategy for fast track government land service 2 March 2018 V6000_002 EVIDENCED BY GLENN OTTREY REQUESTED BY DEVELOPMENT VICTORIA 609-621 BURWOOD HIGHWAY CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................3 2. THE SUBJECT SITE .................................................................................................4 2.1 Subject Site ...............................................................................................................4 3. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS .....................................................................................5 4. ASSESSMENT ..........................................................................................................6 4.1 Stormwater quantity management .............................................................................6 4.2 Stormwater quality management ...............................................................................6 4.3 Flood modelling of Blind Creek ..................................................................................7 4.4 Existing dam ..............................................................................................................8 5. STATEMENT ........................................................................................................... 10 Appendices APPENDIX A – GLENN OTTREY DETAILS, CURRICULUM VITAE AND INSTRUCTIONS -
Habitat Corridors Strategy
Habitat Corridors Strategy April 2005 Prepared by Context MAROONDAH HABITAT CORRIDORS STRATEGY Acknowledgements Contributions and assistance from officers of Maroondah City Council are gratefully acknowledged, particularly the Project Steering Committee: Vivienne Fraser Cormac McCarthy Luci Feher Roger Lord Brad Curtis Peter Goegan Sean McNamee A number of local residents and naturalists have shared their fauna records, local knowledge and ideas for the Strategy. Assistance was also provided by officers from adjoining municipalities and from several government agencies. ii MAROONDAH HABITAT CORRIDORS STRATEGY CONTENTS Acknowledgements ii SUMMARY VI 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. HABITAT LINKS AND CORRIDORS: WHAT ARE THEY AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT? 2 The importance of habitat connectivity 2 What makes a link or corridor 3 3. POLICY AND MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORKS 5 International and national levels 5 Victoria 5 Regional strategies 8 Adjoining municipalities 9 City of Maroondah 9 Current vegetation management practices 15 4. CREATING A NETWORK OF HABITAT LINKS IN MAROONDAH 18 Regional context 18 Identification and assessment of habitat links 18 Target species 33 Strengths, opportunities, weaknesses, and threats 41 Corridor management principles 47 5. ACTION PLAN 49 Council resources and activities 49 Habitat links on Council-managed and other public land 51 Habitat links on private land 51 REFERENCES 52 APPENDIX 1. DESCRIPTIONS OF HABITAT LINKS 53 1.1 Dandenong Creek Corridor 55 1.2 Mullum Mullum Creek Corridor 60 1.3 Bungalook Creek Corridor 65 1.4 Wicklow -
Gaming Policy Direction Paper 2015, Knox City Council, 2016
GAMING POLICY DIRECTION PAPER Knox City Council October 2015 Adopted by Council 24 May 2015 Table of Contents 1 Key Messages .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 4 3 Background ......................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Costs of Gambling ....................................................................................................... 4 3.2 A Competitive Gaming Industry ................................................................................... 6 3.3 Recognising Harm ........................................................................................................ 6 4 Legislation and Policy ......................................................................................................... 7 4.1 Gambling Regulation ................................................................................................... 8 4.1.1 Gambling Regulation Act 2003 (the Gambling Act) .............................................. 8 4.2 Planning Legislation .................................................................................................... 9 4.2.1 Planning and Environment Act 1987 (P&E Act) ................................................... 9 4.2.2 Victoria Planning Provisions ................................................................................