DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluations of Cultural Properties 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WHC-01/CONF.208/INF.11 Rev UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE 25th ordinary session (11 -16 December 2001) Helsinki (Finland) EVALUATIONS OF CULTURAL PROPERTIES Prepared by the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) The IUCN and ICOMOS evaluations are made available to members of the Bureau and the World Heritage Committee. A small number of additional copies are also available from the secretariat. Thank you. 2001 WORLD HERITAGE LIST Nominations 2001 INTRODUCTION I NOMINATIONS OF CULTURAL PROPERTIES A Properties which the Bureau recommended for inscription on the World Heritage List A.1 Historic towns Austria - The Historic Centre of Vienna 1 Brazil - Historic Centre of the Town of Goiás 5 France - Provins, Town of Medieval Fairs 9 Kenya - Lamu Old Town 14 Morocco - The Medina of Essaouira (ancient Mogador) 18 Portugal - Historic Centre of Guimarães 21 Uzbekistan - Samarkand - The place of crossing and synthesis of world cultures 25 A.2 Religious properties China - Yungang Grottoes 31 - The Expanded Potala Palace -Norbulingka - Jokhang Monastery Project 35 in Lhasa: Norbulingka - (Extension) Poland - Churches of Peace in Jawor and Swidnica 38 A.3 Architectural monuments and ensembles Czech Republic - Tugendhat Villa in Brno 42 A.4 Technological ensembles United Kingdom - Derwent Valley Mills 46 - New Lanark 51 - Saltaire 56 A.5 Cultural Landscapes Botswana - Tsodilo 61 Italy - Villa d'Este 66 Lao People’s Democratic Republic - Vat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the 71 Champasak Cultural Landscape Madagascar - The Royal Hill of Ambohimanga 76 Uganda - Tombs of Buganda Kings at Kasubi 80 B Properties which the Bureau referred back B.1 Historic towns Georgia - Tbilisi Historic District 86 Israel - The Old City of Acre 91 B.2 Religious properties Cyprus - Painted Churches in the Troodos Region - Palaichori, 98 Church of Ayia Sotira (Church of the Transfiguration of the Saviour) - (Extension) Spain - Mudéjar de Aragon (Extension of Mudéjar Architecture of Teruel) 100 B.3 Architectural monuments and ensembles Russian Federation - The Bolgar Historical and Architectural Complex 104 B.4 Technological ensembles Germany - The Cultural Industrial Landscape of the Zollverein Mine 109 Sweden - The Historic Cultural Landscape of the Great Copper Mountain in Falun 114 B.5 Cultural Landscapes Italy - The Middle Adda Valley (extension to “Crespi d’Adda”) 119 Portugal - Alto Douro Wine Region 122 Spain - Aranjuez Cultural Landscape 129 C Property which the Bureau did not recommend for inscription on the World Heritage List C.1 Architectural monuments and ensembles Latvia - Jurmala Wooden Construction (Dzintari District of Summer Cottages) 134 II NOMINATIONS OF MIXED PROPERTIES A Property which the Bureau recommended for inscription on the World Heritage List Israel - Masada National Park 137 B Properties which the Bureau referred back Austria-Hungary - Natural Site and Cultural Landscape of Fertö-Neusiedler Lake 142 Russian Federation - Natural complex "Central Sikhote-Alin" 146 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON MONUMENTS AND SITES (ICOMOS) World Heritage Nominations 2001 1 Analysis of nominations •= individual ICOMOS members with special expertise, identified after consultation with International and In 2001 ICOMOS has been requested to evaluate 39 new National Committees; and deferred nominations of and extensions to cultural and mixed properties. •= non-ICOMOS members with special expertise, identified after consultation within the ICOMOS The geographical spread largely duplicates the trend that networks; has become apparent in recent years, with more than half the nominations coming from European countries. There is •= collaborating NGOs (TICCIH, DoCoMoMo). a marked decrease in nominations from Latin America and the Caribbean, but on the other hand there are more from Concurrently, experts were selected on the same basis for Africa: evaluation missions to nominated properties. The same procedure was adopted for selecting these experts as that Europe 29 nominations (6 deferred, 3 just described. The missions were required to study the extensions) criteria relating to authenticity, protection, conservation, 16 countries and management (Operational Guidelines, para 24(b)). Asia/Pacific 4 nominations Experts are sent photocopies of dossiers (or relevant parts 5 countries of them, where the dossiers are extensive). They also Latin America/ 1 nomination receive documentation on the Convention and detailed Caribbean 1 country guidelines for evaluation missions. Africa 4 nominations ICOMOS missions were sent to all the nominated sites 4 countries (including extensions). In the case of mixed sites the missions were organized and carried out jointly by Arab States 1 nomination ICOMOS and IUCN. IUCN experts also participated in joint missions to some cultural landscapes. It was The distribution by country from those States Parties necessary for climatic and logistic reasons to delay nominating more than one property was as follows: missions to several properties until after meetings of the 4 nominations Italy (1 extension) ICOMOS World Heritage Panel and the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee. 3 nominations United Kingdom (1 deferral) The missions were carried out by a total of 33 experts from 2 nominations Austria (1 with Hungary) 24 countries and Advisory Bodies. The geographical China (1 extension) distribution of experts closely parallels that of the Georgia nominated sites, in accordance with the ICOMOS policy of Israel selecting regional experts for missions. The countries from Poland which ICOMOS experts were drawn were Belgium, Czech Spain (1 extension) Republic, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iran, Turkey Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Malta, Norway, Pakistan, The Comparison with the distribution in 2000, the types of site Philippines, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, show a substantial increase in the proportion of cultural Sweden, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and Zimbabwe. In landscapes and a decrease in monuments and addition, missions were carried out by representatives of archaeological sites: ICCROM, TICCIH, and the ICOMOS World Heritage Secretariat. Monument or group 11 (28%) Historic towns/town centres 9 (23%) b Evaluations and recommendations Cultural landscapes 9 (23%) On the basis of the reports prepared by the two groups of Archaeological sites 2 (5%) experts, draft evaluations and recommendations (in either Mixed sites 4 (10%) English or French) were prepared and considered by the Industrial sites 4 (10%) ICOMOS World Heritage Panel and Executive Committee at a meeting in Paris on 29–31 March 2001. Following 2 ICOMOS procedure this meeting, revised evaluations were prepared in both working languages, printed, and presented to the Bureau of a Preparatory work the World Heritage Committee at its 25th Session in June 2001. Following an initial study of the dossiers, expert advice was sought on the outstanding universal value of the On the basis of the decisions taken by the Bureau nominated properties, with reference to the six criteria supplementary information was requested from States listed in the Operational Guidelines (1999), para 24(a). Parties in respect of several nominated properties. Where For this purpose, ICOMOS called upon the following: this information had been received at the time this volume of evaluations was sent to the printer, this has been •= ICOMOS International Scientific Committees; incorporated in the revised texts. In some cases, however, since this material had not been received by that date, oral recommendations will be given at the 25th Session of the Committee in Helsinki in December 2001 and, where possible, revised texts will be made available in both working languages. There are two slight modifications to previous ICOMOS practice in the preparation of evaluations. “Statements of significance” have been included in addition to the citations for each criterion under which properties are proposed for inscription. The evaluations also include the recommendations of the Bureau at its June 2001 meeting. Paris September 2001 including three major developments, medieval, Baroque, and Gründerzeit, in its urban pattern and its individual buildings. Vienna (Austria) The historic centre of Vienna has an imperial design in its layout and the individual monuments, and has thus become a No 1033 symbol of Austrian history. Criterion iv Vienna is directly and tangibly associated with artistic and especially musical works of outstanding universal significance. Based on ecclesiastic liturgical music since medieval times, as well as minnesang and ancient dance music, Vienna became a centre of European music as early as the beginning of the 16th century under the Habsburgs. Identification Opera, which emerged in Italy at the end of 16th century, became firmly established at the court of Vienna in the High Nomination The Historic Centre of Vienna Baroque. The Viennese Classicists (Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert) consolidated Vienna’s reputation as Location Vienna the musical capital of Europe, a reputation that has continued and is expressed also in light music (Strauss) and modern State Party Republic of Austria music (Neo-Viennese School). Criterion vi Date 27 June 2000 Category of property In terms of the categories of cultural property set out in Article 1 of the 1972 World Heritage Convention, this is a Justification by State Party site. The historic centre of Vienna proposed for inclusion in UNESCO’s World Heritage List constitutes
Recommended publications
  • Irina Černākova Vodlozerie

    Irina Černākova Vodlozerie

    „Przeszłość Demograficzna Polski” 38, 2016, nr 1 DOI: 10.18276/pdp.2016.1.38-02 Irina Černâkova Pietrozawodsk, Russia Vodlozerie (North-West Russia): former social potential in the light of historical data and geographical landscape Introduction The Vodlozero region is an area of early peasant settlement in the Russian North. It is located to the northeast of the Lake Onego, surrounding the rather lar- ge Lake Vodlozero – one of the four largest water reservoirs in southern Karelia (Northwest Russia). The watershed between the two lakes forms a natural eastern border of the region. From the south and north its borders were defined by the settlement areas of the Russians, who identified themselves as “Vodlozery”, i.e. inhabitants of Vodlozerie and not any other historical or cultural province.1 Interestingly, the region’s remoteness from cultural and economic centers had more influence on its development in modern times than during Middle Ages. A sys- tem of Vodlozerie settlements within the borders of “boyarshchina” – feudal lands of Novgorod people – existed here and was well documented in the cadastral sources as early as in the middle of the 16th century, and furthermore it was preserved almost unchanged up until the 20th century. Since the 18th century the region has become more and more isolated. The reason for this isolation is believed to be the shift of the trade routes towards the new capital of Saint Petersburg as well as the almost complete absence of roads.2 Indeed, there were never built any asphalt roads leading to the Vodlozero region. The settlements were mostly located on the islands in Lake 1 Valentina Kuznecova, Boris Putilov, ed., Pamâtniki russkogo folʹklora Vodlozerʹâ: Predaniâ i bylički (Pertozavodsk 1997), 105–106, 107–110, 111.
  • Wine & Brandy Tour 5 Days

    Wine & Brandy Tour 5 Days

    WINE & BRANDY TOUR 5 DAYS Private special escorted tour for individuals and families BEST TIME JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC History and culture of Georgia have always been closely intertwined with winemaking tradition. Wine in local culture is often considered as a symbol of hospitality and friendship. Oldest evidence of winemaking has been recently discovered at the archaeological site near Tbilisi, at the 8000-year old village. Nowadays there are over 500 species of grape in Georgia, while up to 40 of those varieties are used in commercial wine production. 5-day “Wine and Brandy” introduces you to the Georgian wine. Tour takes off in the capital Tbilisi and travels to the major traditional winemaking region of Georgia – Kakheti. On this tour, travelers will be able to sightsee Tbilisi, visit the best wineries of Kakheti region, taste various local types of wine, and take a look at both modern and traditional ways of wine and brandy production of the country. Group will be accompanied by local, professional and experienced guide and driver MAIN HIGHLIGHTS & SITES: TBILISI CITY KAKHETI REGION • Holy Trinity Cathedral • Signagi town • Narikala Fortress 4Th C • Sighnaghi Pheasant’s Tears wine cellar • Legvtakhevi Waterfall • Winery & museum Numisi in Velistsikhe 16th c • Sulfur bathhouse square • Kvareli Wine Tunnels • Shardeni str & Bridge of Peace • Telavi Town • Meidan square • Telavi Farmer’s Bazaar • Georgian National Museum • Tsinandali Residence of Al. Chavchavadze 19th c • Sarajishvili Brandy Factory • Gremi Royal Residence & Castle 16th c • Funicular Train & Mtatsminda Park • Twin’s Wine Cellar and Museum DAY TO DAY ITINERARY 1 DAY Arrival in Tbilisi Airport-Tbilisi City Tour back to the 4th century.
  • Freedom of Religion Or Belief in Georgia 2010-2019

    Freedom of Religion Or Belief in Georgia 2010-2019

    FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF IN GEORGIA Report 2010-2019 FREEDOM OF RELIGION OR BELIEF IN GEORGIA REPORT 2010-2019 Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI) 2020 The report is prepared by Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI) within the framework of East-West Management Institute’s (EWMI) "Promoting Rule of Law in Georgia" (PROLoG) project, funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The report is published with the support from the Open Society Georgia Foundation (OSGF). The content is the sole responsibility of the Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI) and does not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), United States Government, East-West Management Institute (EWMI) or Open Society Georgia Foundation (OSGF). Authors: Mariam Gavtadze, Eka Chitanava, Anzor Khatiashvili, Mariam Jikia, Shota Tutberidze, Gvantsa Lomaia Project director: Mariam Gavtadze Translators: Natia Nadiradze, Tamar Kvaratskhelia Design: Tornike Lortkipanidze Cover: shutterstock It is prohibited to reprint, copy or distribute the material for commercial purposes without written consent of the Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI). Tolerance and Diversity Institute (TDI), 2020 Web: www.tdi.ge CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Methodology ..........................................................................................................................................................10
  • Adoption Des Déclarations Rétrospectives De Valeur Universelle Exceptionnelle

    Adoption Des Déclarations Rétrospectives De Valeur Universelle Exceptionnelle

    Patrimoine mondial 40 COM WHC/16/40.COM/8E.Rev Paris, 10 juin 2016 Original: anglais / français ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L’ÉDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Quarantième session Istanbul, Turquie 10 – 20 juillet 2016 Point 8 de l’ordre du jour provisoire : Etablissement de la Liste du patrimoine mondial et de la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril. 8E: Adoption des Déclarations rétrospectives de valeur universelle exceptionnelle RESUME Ce document présente un projet de décision concernant l’adoption de 62 Déclarations rétrospectives de valeur universelle exceptionnelle soumises par 18 États parties pour les biens n’ayant pas de Déclaration de valeur universelle exceptionnelle approuvée à l’époque de leur inscription sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial. L’annexe contient le texte intégral des Déclarations rétrospectives de valeur universelle exceptionnelle dans la langue dans laquelle elles ont été soumises au Secrétariat. Projet de décision : 40 COM 8E, voir Point II. Ce document annule et remplace le précédent I. HISTORIQUE 1. La Déclaration de valeur universelle exceptionnelle est un élément essentiel, requis pour l’inscription d’un bien sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial, qui a été introduit dans les Orientations devant guider la mise en oeuvre de la Convention du patrimoine mondial en 2005. Tous les biens inscrits depuis 2007 présentent une telle Déclaration. 2. En 2007, le Comité du patrimoine mondial, dans sa décision 31 COM 11D.1, a demandé que les Déclarations de valeur universelle exceptionnelle soient rétrospectivement élaborées et approuvées pour tous les biens du patrimoine mondial inscrits entre 1978 et 2006.
  • Sacred Music, 136.4, Winter 2009

    Sacred Music, 136.4, Winter 2009

    SACRED MUSIC Winter 2009 Volume 136, Number 4 EDITORIAL Viennese Classical Masses? | William Mahrt 3 ARTICLES Between Tradition and Innovation: Sacred Intersections and the Symphonic Impulse in Haydn’s Late Masses | Eftychia Papanikolaou 6 “Requiem per me”: Antonio Salieri’s Plans for His Funeral | Jane Schatkin Hettrick 17 Haydn’s “Nelson” Mass in Recorded Performance: Text and Context | Nancy November 26 Sunday Vespers in the Parish Church | Fr. Eric M. Andersen 33 REPERTORY The Masses of William Byrd | William Mahrt 42 COMMENTARY Seeking the Living: Why Composers Have a Responsibility to be Accessible to the World | Mark Nowakowski 49 The Role of Beauty in the Liturgy | Fr. Franklyn M. McAfee, D.D. 51 Singing in Unison? Selling Chant to the Reluctant Choir | Mary Jane Ballou 54 ARCHIVE The Lost Collection of Chant Cylinders | Fr. Jerome F. Weber 57 The Ageless Story | Jennifer Gregory Miller 62 REVIEWS A Gift to Priests | Rosalind Mohnsen 66 A Collection of Wisdom and Delight | William Tortolano 68 The Fire Burned Hot | Jeffrey Tucker 70 NEWS The Chant Pilgrimage: A Report 74 THE LAST WORD Musical Instruments and the Mass | Kurt Poterack 76 POSTSCRIPT Gregorian Chant: Invention or Restoration? | William Mahrt SACRED MUSIC Formed as a continuation of Caecilia, published by the Society of St. Caecilia since 1874, and The Catholic Choirmaster, published by the Society of St. Gre- gory of America since 1915. Published quarterly by the Church Music Associ- ation of America. Office of Publication: 12421 New Point Drive, Harbour Cove, Richmond, VA 23233. E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.musicasacra.com Editor: William Mahrt Managing Editor: Jeffrey Tucker Editor-at-Large: Kurt Poterack Editorial Assistance: Janet Gorbitz and David Sullivan.
  • Confronting Intolerance and Discrimination Against Muslims in Public Discourse

    Confronting Intolerance and Discrimination Against Muslims in Public Discourse

    Confronting Intolerance and Discrimination against Muslims in Public Discourse Vienna, 27-28 October 2011 The Hofburg Congress Centre, Ratsaal Information for Participants 1. Meeting Venue The conference will take place in the Hofburg Congress Centre in the Ratsaal conference room. The entrance to the centre, which is located on Heldenplatz, is shown on the map on the final page of this document. You will find an OSCE flag and the words "Hofburg Kongresszentrum" above the door. Participant registration will take place on October 28, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. Participants are kindly reminded to bring appropriate identification for registration purposes. 1 2. Transportation from the Airport to Vienna City Taxis: Taxis can either be hailed at the airport or can be booked in advance at a more moderate price from the company C&K (Tel: +43 1 44444 – price). City Airport Train (CAT): The CAT can also be taken into the city centre of Vienna "Wien-Mitte" – Landstraße/Hauptstraße with access to the Underground (U-Bahn Line 3 and 4). For more information, including the price of a one-way or return ticket and the train schedule, please refer to the following website: www.cityairporttrain.at Bus Services: There are also two Vienna Airport bus lines. These lines go either to Morzinplatz/Schwedenplatz or to Südbahnhof/Westbahnhof (both stops provide access to the Underground). Please refer to the following website for information regarding price and scheduling: www.postbus.at or call tel: +43 (1) 7007-32300 3. Getting to the Conference Venue Via Public Transport : Trams 1, 2 and D all stop on the Ring, close to the Hofburg.
  • The Distinctiveness of Bohemian Baroque: a Study in the Architecture of Central Europe, C.1680-C.1720

    The Distinctiveness of Bohemian Baroque: a Study in the Architecture of Central Europe, C.1680-C.1720

    artificialhorizon.org The distinctiveness of Bohemian baroque: a study in the architecture of Central Europe, c.1680-c.1720 RALPH HARRINGTON Between the late seventeenth century and the first years of the eighteenth the architecture of Bohemia underwent a marked transformation as the Italian influences that had been dominant until around 1690 gave way before Southern German and Austrian influences. In 1680 there were 28 architects of Italian origin working in Prague, compared with seven recorded as coming from northern Europe.1 The rapidity with which German influence displaced Italian can be gauged from the fact that by the later 1690s the proportions were reversed, largely as a result of the great immigration of architects, particularly from southern Germany, which took place from 1690 to 1700. This influx of talent ensured that, despite long-established Italian architectural dominance, the great flowering of the Austrian baroque which took place in the 1680s had rapid repercussions in Bohemia, where its influence interacted with local influences to produce a style of architecture altogether distinct from that prevalent in Austria itself. The first phase of the Austrian baroque had itself been dependent on Italian artists, and a large number of architects, sculptors and decorators originating in Italy made vital contributions to the development of the style known as ‘Imperial Baroque’. This Austrian imperial architectural style, dynamic in its manipulation of volumes and planes, grandiloquent in detail but massively authoritarian in overall character, had reached its fullest expression around 1700, finding its greatest exponents in two Italian-trained native architects, Johann Fischer von Erlach (1656- 1723) and Lucas von Hildebrandt (1688-1745).
  • A Compendium of Niosh Mining Research 2002

    A Compendium of Niosh Mining Research 2002

    A COMPENDIUM OF NIOSH MINING RESEARCH 2002 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Washington, DC December 2001 ORDERING INFORMATION Copies of National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) documents and information about occupational safety and health are available from NIOSH–Publications Dissemination 4676 Columbia Parkway Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 FAX: 513-533-8573 Telephone: 1-800-35-NIOSH (1-800-356-4674) E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.cdc.gov/niosh This document is the public domain and may be freely copied or reprinted. Disclaimer: Mention of any company or product does not constitute endorsement by NIOSH. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2002-110 FOREWORD The mining community serves the needs of our Nation in virtually every aspect of our daily lives by providing the materials we use for construction, electronics, manufacturing, energy, agriculture, medicine, and electricity. This industry has demonstrated time and time again an almost unbelievable ability to rise to any and all challenges it faces. Productivity has increased over the past 20 years to levels never before imagined, and the industry operates in one of the most difficult and challenging environments imaginable. The professionalism and pride of our mine workers are unmatched throughout the world, and our mining community is held in the highest regard around the globe. Interactions with mining professionals from other countries have always left me with a deep feeling of respect for what our mining community accomplishes. The recent tragedy we faced with the coal mine explosion in Alabama is a reminder to all of us about the dangers of rock and mineral extraction.
  • The Historian-Filmmaker's Dilemma: Historical Documentaries in Sweden in the Era of Häger and Villius

    The Historian-Filmmaker's Dilemma: Historical Documentaries in Sweden in the Era of Häger and Villius

    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Historica Upsaliensia 210 Utgivna av Historiska institutionen vid Uppsala universitet genom Torkel Jansson, Jan Lindegren och Maria Ågren 1 2 David Ludvigsson The Historian-Filmmaker’s Dilemma Historical Documentaries in Sweden in the Era of Häger and Villius 3 Dissertation in History for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy presented at Uppsala University in 2003 ABSTRACT Ludvigsson, David, 2003: The Historian-Filmmaker’s Dilemma. Historical Documentaries in Sweden in the Era of Häger and Villius. Written in English. Acta Universitatis Upsalien- sis. Studia Historica Upsaliensia 210. (411 pages). Uppsala 2003. ISSN 0081-6531. ISBN 91-554-5782-7. This dissertation investigates how history is used in historical documentary films, and ar- gues that the maker of such films constantly negotiates between cognitive, moral, and aes- thetic demands. In support of this contention a number of historical documentaries by Swedish historian-filmmakers Olle Häger and Hans Villius are discussed. Other historical documentaries supply additional examples. The analyses take into account both the produc- tion process and the representations themselves. The history culture and the social field of history production together form the conceptual framework for the study, and one of the aims is to analyse the role of professional historians in public life. The analyses show that different considerations compete and work together in the case of all documentaries, and figure at all stages of pre-production, production, and post-produc- tion. But different considerations have particular inuence at different stages in the produc- tion process and thus they are more or less important depending on where in the process the producer puts his emphasis on them.
  • Million Book Collection

    Million Book Collection

    E TURKS IN PALESTINE BY ALEXANDER AARONSOHf WITH THE TURKS IN PALESTINE Photograph, Undern-innl \- /"/<>/<nr<>nd, -A*.r. DJEMAL PASHA WITH THE TURKS IN PALESTINE BY ALEXANDER AARONSOHN With Illustrations BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY fiibcrjibe pce 1916 COPYRIGHT, lQl6, BY THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY COMPANY COPYRIGHT, 1916, BY HOUGHTONMIFFLIN COMPANY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Published October iqib TO MY MOTHER WHO LIVED AND FOUGHT AND DIED FOB A REGENERATED PALESTINE What have I done, or tried, or said In thanks to that dear woman dead ? MASEFIELD ACKNOWLEDGMENT To the editors of the Ailantic Monthly, to the publishers, and to the many friends who have encouraged me, I am and shall ever remain grateful CONTENTS INTRODUCTION xiii I. ZlCRON-jACOB 1 II. PRESSED INTO THE SERVICE 7 III. THE GERMAN PROPAGANDA 18 IV. ROAD-MAKING AND DISCHARGE 23 V. THE HIDDEN ARMS 29 VI. THE SUEZ CAMPAIGN 36 VII. FIGHTING THE LOCUSTS 49 VIII. THE LEBANON 53 IX. A ROBBER BARON OF PALESTINE 62 X. A RASH ADVENTURE 70 XI. ESCAPE 78 ILLUSTRATIONS DJEMALPASHA Frontispiece Photographby Underwood& Underwood THE CEMETERYOF ZICHON-JACOB 2 SAFFED 10 Photographby Underwood& Underwood THE AUTHOR ON HIS HORSE KOCHBA 14 Photographby Mr. Julius Rosemcald,of Chicago,in Marsh,19 H SOLDIERS'TENTS m SAMARIA 18 NAZARETH, FROM THE NORTHEAST 26 Photographby Underwood& Underwood HOUSE OF THE AUTHOR'S FATHER, EPHKAIM FISHL AARON- SOHN,IN ZlCRON-jACOB 30 IN A NATIVE CAFE, SAFFED 36 Photographby Mr. Julius Rosenwtdd A LEMONADE-SELLER OF DAMASCUS 36 Photographby Mr. Julius Rosenwald RAILROAD STATION SCENE BETWEEN HAIFA AND DAMASCUS 46 Photograph by Mr.
  • UNSCEAR 2006 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes

    UNSCEAR 2006 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes

    EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2006 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes VOLUME II Scientific Annexes C, D and E UNITED NATIONS New York, 2009 NOTE The report of the Committee without its annexes appears as Official Records of the General Assembly, Sixty-first Session, Supplement No. 46 and corrigendum (A/61/46 and Corr. 1). The report reproduced here includes the corrections of the corrigendum. The designation employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations con- cerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The country names used in this document are, in most cases, those that were in use at the time the data were collected or the text prepared. In other cases, however, the names have been updated, where this was possible and appropriate, to reflect political changes. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.09.IX.5 ISBN 978-92-1-142270-2 Corrigendum to Sales No. E.09.IX.5 May 2011 Effects of Ionizing Radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 2006 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes—Volume II Annex E (“Sources-to-effects assessment for radon in homes and workplaces”), paragraph 460 The ninth sentence should read For residential exposure to 150 Bq/m3, the authors estimated a combined OR of 1.1 (95% CI: 1.0, 1.3).
  • Armenians in the Making of Modern Georgia

    Armenians in the Making of Modern Georgia

    Armenians in the Making of Modern Georgia Timothy K. Blauvelt & Christofer Berglund While sharing a common ethnic heritage and national legacy, and an ambiguous status in relation to the Georgian state and ethnic majority, the Armenians in Georgia comprise not one, but several distinct communities with divergent outlooks, concerns, and degrees of assimilation. There are the urbanised Armenians of the capital city, Tbilisi (earlier called Tiflis), as well as the more agricultural circle of Armenians residing in the Javakheti region in southwestern Georgia.1 Notwithstanding their differences, these communities have both helped shape modern Armenian political and cultural identity, and still represent an intrinsic part of the societal fabric in Georgia. The Beginnings The ancient kingdoms of Greater Armenia encompassed parts of modern Georgia, and left an imprint on the area as far back as history has been recorded. Moreover, after the collapse of the independent Armenian kingdoms and principalities in the 4th century AD, some of their subjects migrated north to the Georgian kingdoms seeking save haven. Armenians and Georgians in the Caucasus existed in a boundary space between the Roman-Byzantine and Iranian cultures and, while borrowing from both spheres, struggled to preserve their autonomy. The Georgian regal Bagratids shared common origins with the Armenian Bagratuni dynasty. And as part of his campaign to forge a unified Georgian kingdom in the late 11th and early 12th centuries, the Georgian King David the Builder encouraged Armenian merchants to settle in Georgian towns. They primarily settled in Tiflis, once it was conquered from the Arabs, and in the town of Gori, which had been established specifically for Armenian settlers (Lordkipanidze 1974: 37).