DOCSLIB.ORG

Attachment 4

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Attachment 4 Attachment 4 National Railroad Passenger Corporation LIMITS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRACK SAFETY, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION MW 1000 Office of the Deputy Chief Engineer-Track 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 Effective December 11, 1976 Revision 1, December 1, 1985 Revision 2, January 1, 1992 Revision 3, September 21, 1998 Revision 4, March 1, 2013 3/1/2013 MW 1000 Safety, Maintenance and Construction Office of The Deputy Chief Engineer-Track 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 Revision 4, March 1, 2013 Deputy Chief Engineer–Track 3/1/2013 Mission Statement It is the policy of the Amtrak Engineering Department to inspect and maintain the safest railroad in the world. The MW 1000 is a key document in realizing that goal. The MW 1000 details Amtrak's requirements for inspection, maintenance and construction. It is expected that Engineering Department personnel shall receive the classroom and on-the-job training to utilize the MW 1000 to the fullest extent. Understanding the requirements and technical issues contained in the MW 1000 will enable the Track Inspector and Track Foreman to inspect and maintain the world's safest railway. Commitment to safety while making inspections or repairs is absolutely essential if Amtrak is to have a world class railway. Quality inspection is key to ensuring that the condition of the property is accurately reported so that repairs or replacements of track structure may be programmed in a systematic and orderly fashion. The MW 1000 is an interactive document. It's development involved many man-hours and input of many individuals. It is expected that every individual in the Engineering Department that has reason to use this document will constantly strive to offer suggestions and constructive criticism to improve the overall understanding, user friendliness and quality of the MW 1000. 3/1/2013 3/1/2013 The MW 1000 General The MW 1000 is written for use by Amtrak maintenance-of- way forces in the inspection, maintenance and construction of track. The MW 1000 has three parts: Part I Limits and Specifications for Track Safety, Maintenance and Construction Part II Limits and Specifications for Turnout (and Other Trackwork) Safety, Maintenance and Construction (This Part also includes slips, crossing diamonds, and other special trackwork. Part III Limits and Specifications for Miter Rail and Expansion Joint Safety, Maintenance and Construction Limits in the turnout and miter rail parts are unique and in some cases more restrictive, thus superseding the track limits given in Part I. As an example, the gage safety limits for miter rails given in Part III are more restrictive then the gage safety limits for track found in Part I. Safety limits are limits, once passed, that would require the immediate repair of track, slow orders, or removal from service. It is Amtrak's policy to have track that never reaches these limits. Maintenance is replacing a component of the track structure such as laying new or fit rail or installing ties. Maintenance limits are to be used as a triggering mechanism that prompt maintenance or reconstruction. It is Amtrak's policy to have a track structure that stays between construction and maintenance limits. As the track structure breaks down, maintenance should be programmed before the track reaches the maintenance limits. Maintenance must be executed whenever the maintenance limits are exceeded and completed prior to reaching the safety limits. Whenever possible, track should be repaired or reconstructed to construction limits. Construction is the complete replacement of track structure from subgrade to top of rail. It should always be the goal to complete construction projects to a zero tolerance from the plans and specifications. This is not always practical given such variables as rail rolling tolerances and manufacturing limitations. Therefore, construction tolerances have been developed. 3/1/2013 Paragraph Number and Lettering The MW 1000 is composed of three Parts: Track, Turnouts and Miter Rails and Expansion Joints. Each Part contains a "Safety," "Maintenance" and "Construction" subpart. These subparts are further broken down into paragraphs (§) as is the Code of Federal Regulations, 49 CFR Part 213. Wherever possible, the paragraph numbers for similar topics of interest remain the same throughout this document. The use of the paragraph acronyms and their location in the MW 1000 is summarized below. Part Title Acronym Subpart of the MW 1000 I Track None Safety Limits I Track M Maintenance Limits I Track C Construction Limits II Turnouts TO Safety Limits II Turnouts TOM Maintenance Limits II Turnouts TOC Construction Limits III Miter Rails and MR Safety Limits Expansion Joints III Miter Rails and MRM Maintenance Limits Expansion Joints III Miter Rails and MRC Construction Limits Expansion Joints Using the example of gage, the following table lists the location of gage references in the MW 1000: Part Title Paragraph Paragraph Comments Number Name I Track §213.53 Gage Safety Limits I Track §53.0(M) Gage Maintenance Limits I Track §53.0(C) Gage Construction Limits II Turnouts §213.53(TO) Gage Safety Limits II Turnouts §53.0(TOM) Gage Maintenance Limits II Turnouts §53.0(TOC) Gage Construction Limits III Miter Rails §213.53(MR) Gage Safety and Limits Expansion Joints III Miter Rails §53.0(MRM) Gage Maintenance and Limits Expansion Joints III Miter Rails §53.0(MRC) Gage Construction and Limits Expansion Joints As shown above, an acronym is used after the paragraph number to designate the location of the paragraph within the MW 1000. 3/1/2013 The acronyms "TO" or "MR" indicate that the paragraph is found in the Turnout or Miter Rail and Expansion Joint Parts, respectively. The acronyms "M" or "C" indicate that the paragraph is maintenance or construction related. Cross Referencing of Paragraphs to Applicable 49 CFR Part 213 Numbers The MW 1000, Part I, Track, now includes a Subpart G for Track Classes 6-9. This subpart has been added in response to revisions made to 49 CFR Part 213. Paragraphs in Subpart G of the MW 1000 keep established paragraph nomenclature used in Subpart A-F (Track Classes 1-5) and make reference to the appropriate numbers used in Subpart G in the CFR. Paragraphs in Subpart G have a "0" (zero) added to the paragraph number to indicate that the user is now in the Track Class 6-9 Safety Limits section. The MW 1000 paragraph number is followed by the correct CFR paragraph number in parentheses. Examples given below illustrate paragraph numbering and cross referencing: Part Title Subject Paragraph Comments I Track Safety Gage §213.053 Track Class Limits (FRA 6-9 §213.323) I Track Safety Alignment §213.055 Track Class Limits (FRA 6-9 §213.327) I Track Safety Track §213.063 Track Class Limits Surface (FRA 6-9 §213.331) Similar types of cross-referencing exist in the Safety Limit subpart of Part II, Limits and Specifications for Turnout (and Other Trackwork). 3/1/2013 3/1/2013 MW 1000 Table of Contents Limits and Specifications for Track Safety, Maintenance and Construction .................................................................. I Limits and Specifications for Turnout (and Other Trackwork) Safety, Maintenance and Construction .......II Limits and Specifications for Miter Rail and Expansion Joint Safety, Maintenance and Construction..................III Glossary of Railroad Terms..............................Appendix A Underbalance Table – Maximum Allowable Operating Speed on Curves ............................. Appendix B Braking Distance Table.....................................Appendix C Track Buckling Countermeasures ...................Appendix D Weights and Measures ...................................... Appendix E Master Index 3/1/2013 3/1/2013 National Railroad Passenger Corporation PART I LIMITS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRACK SAFETY, MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION MW 1000 3/1/2013 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 3/1/2013 SUBPARTS A-G LIMITS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRACK SAFETY 3/1/2013 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 3/1/2013 LIMITS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRACK SAFETY SUBPARTS A-F Track Classes 1-5 Subpart A — General........................................................ I-1 §213.1 Scope of Subpart ..............................................I-1 §213.2 Preemptive Effect.............................................I-1 §213.3 Application .......................................................I-1 §213.4 Excepted Track.................................................I-1 §213.5 Responsibility for Compliance.........................I-2 §213.6 Protection..........................................................I-2 §213.7 Designation of Qualified Persons to Supervise Certain Renewals and Inspect Track................I-4 §213.9 Classes of Track: Operating Speed Limits......I-5 §213.11 Restoration or Renewal of Track Under Traffic Conditions ............................................I-5 §213.13 Measuring Track Not Under Load ...................I-6 §213.15 Penalties............................................................I-6 §213.17 Waivers.............................................................I-6 §213.18 Quality Control.................................................I-6 §213.20 Track Inspection Measurements ......................I-7 §213.21 Class-Specific Defects .....................................I-7 §213.22 Non-Class-Specific Defects .............................I-7 Subpart B — Roadbed .................................................... I-10 §213.31 Scope of Subpart ............................................I-10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Section 1 (Parts 1 - 4) of This Specification Includes Rail Welding by Electric Flash-Butt Welding Method
    SECTION 05091 RAIL WELDING NOTE: Section 1 (Parts 1 - 4) of this specification includes rail welding by Electric Flash-Butt Welding method. Section 2 (Parts 5 - 8) of this specification includes rail welding by the Thermite Rail Welding method. SECTION 1 - ELECTRIC FLASH-BUTT WELDING PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. The work specified in this section shall include the fabrication of continuous welded rail (CWR) strings by electric flash-butt welding, including testing, inspection, and qualification of welding and welders. B. The work specified in this section shall also include movement of rail from the manufacturer to the Contractor’s welding plant, from the welding plant to the welded string storage location and from the storage location to the final placement in track location. 1.02 RELATED SECTIONS A. Section 05651- General Track Construction B. Section 05652 - Ballasted Track Construction C. Section 05653 - Direct Fixation Track Construction D. Section 05656 - Running Rail 1.03 REFERENCES A. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) Manual for Railway Engineering, Vol. I, Chapter 4, Specification for Fabrication of Continuous Welded Rail (latest addition). B. ASTM E18 C . ASTM E709 (replaced E109) D . ASTM E94 (replaced E142) E. ASTM E164 F . ASTM E709 (duplicate) G. AWS D1.1 1X0000 (11/07) 05091 - 1 H. USNRC Rules and Regulations, Title 10, Atomic Energy, Part 20. I. ASNT SNT-TC-1A Recommended Guidelines for Qualification and Certification of Non- Destructive Testing Personnel. 1.04 SUBMITTALS A. The Contractor shall submit procedures and documentation in accordance with the Section 01300 and as follows.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Power Supply
    3 Power supply Table of contents Article 44 Installation, etc. of Contact Lines, etc. .........................................................................2 Article 45 Approach or Crossing of Overhead Contact Lines, etc................................................ 10 Article 46 Insulation Division of Contact Lines............................................................................ 12 Article 47 Prevention of Problems under Overbridges, etc........................................................... 13 Article 48 Installation of Return Current Rails ........................................................................... 13 Article 49 Lightning protection..................................................................................................... 13 Article 51 Facilities at substations................................................................................................. 14 Article 52 Installation of electrical equipment and switchboards ................................................. 15 Article 53 Protection of electrical equipment................................................................................ 16 Article 54 Insulation of electric lines ............................................................................................ 16 Article 55 Grounding of Electrical Equipment ............................................................................. 18 Article 99 Inspection and monitoring of the contact lines on the main line.................................. 19 Article 101 Records........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Przegląd Komunikacyjny 6/2019 1 Jacek Makuch Dr Inż
    Transportation Overview - Przegl ąd Komunikacyjny 6/2019 Jacek Makuch Dr in ż. Politechnika Wrocławska, Wydział Budownictwa L ądowego i Wodnego; Katedra Mostów i Kolei [email protected] DOI: 10.35117/A_ENG_19_06_01 Measurements of transverse section wear of rails in tracks of tram-loop Abstract: In article the problems of classical methods of transverse section wear of rails replacement with new techniques based on electronic devices was concerned. Reasons of rails shape section changes were defined. Principles of rails waste inspection resulting from regulations were reminded. Review of practical measurement methods and devices were made. Shapes of nominal sections of rails used in tram tracks were analyzed. Realization of measurements executed with mechanical-electronic profile gauge and mechanical track gauge on tram-loop S ępolno in Wrocław were described. Proposal of graphic manner analysis of rail wear measurements in connection with track width measurements were proposed. In summary conclusions from effected investigations were formulated. Keywords: Tram tracks; Diagnostics; Profile Gauge Introduction In August 2017, the exchange of tram switches at the intersection of Paderewski and Mickiewicz streets. At the time of these works, the S ępolno loop was excluded from streetcar traffic. The author of this article managed to obtain the infrastructure manager's approval (ZDiUM) for measurements of rail shape section wear on this loop at that time. These examinations were not the result of any order or grant but resulted only from the need to check the correct operation of diagnostic equipment used in teaching, before the beginning of the next semester of classes with students. The possibility of carrying them out, however, has become an opportunity to recognize some interesting problems that are the result of replacing the classic methods of measuring rail section wear with new techniques based on the use of electronic devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimisation of Mechanised Maintenance Management
    Leon Zaayman OPTIMISATION OF MECHANISED MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT eBOOK INSIDE Optimisation of Mechanised Maintenance Management Abstract Railway track infrastructure is a complex system consisting of various subsystems which require incremental maintenance from all engineering disciplines; all of whom are competing for the limited time and number of available maintenance windows. The constant demand for higher traffic volumes, increased train speeds and heavier axle loadings all result in an exponential increase in maintenance requirements but the time available for maintenance is as a result even further reduced. This requires a more scientific lifecycle approach to infrastructure maintenance management. It also requires increased performance from mechanised construction, maintenance and renewal machines to keep the infrastructure reliable, available, maintainable, affordable and safe within the short available maintenance windows. The objectives of this book are to address the optimisation of infrastructure mainte- nance management and to provide a model with selection criteria for maintenance machinery and their features for the prevailing circumstances. Leon Zaayman [email protected] January 2019 1st Edition All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of both the copyright owner and the publisher of this book. The greatest care has been taken in compiling this book. However, no responsibility can be accepted by the publishers or compilers for the accuracy of the information presented. While every effort has been made to contact copyright-holders of material produced or cited in this book, in the case of those it has not been possible to contact successfully, the author and publishers will be glad to make amendments in further editions.
    [Show full text]
  • Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe
    Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe Version 3 December 2017 This publication was prepared by Oleh Shchuryk, Research & Projects Manager, ECG – the Association of European Vehicle Logistics. Foreword The project to produce this book on ‘Finished Vehicle Logistics by Rail in Europe’ was initiated during the ECG Land Transport Working Group meeting in January 2014, Frankfurt am Main. Initially, it was suggested by the members of the group that Oleh Shchuryk prepares a short briefing paper about the current status quo of rail transport and FVLs by rail in Europe. It was to be a concise document explaining the complex nature of rail, its difficulties and challenges, main players, and their roles and responsibilities to be used by ECG’s members. However, it rapidly grew way beyond these simple objectives as you will see. The first draft of the project was presented at the following Land Transport WG meeting which took place in May 2014, Frankfurt am Main. It received further support from the group and in order to gain more knowledge on specific rail technical issues it was decided that ECG should organise site visits with rail technical experts of ECG member companies at their railway operations sites. These were held with DB Schenker Rail Automotive in Frankfurt am Main, BLG Automotive in Bremerhaven, ARS Altmann in Wolnzach, and STVA in Valenton and Paris. As a result of these collaborations, and continuous research on various rail issues, the document was extensively enlarged. The document consists of several parts, namely a historical section that covers railway development in Europe and specific EU countries; a technical section that discusses the different technical issues of the railway (gauges, electrification, controlling and signalling systems, etc.); a section on the liberalisation process in Europe; a section on the key rail players, and a section on logistics services provided by rail.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Risks to Road and Rail Transport Associated with Asymmetric Loading of Containers
    Rail Standards Safety Board PUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR691 Potential risks to road and rail transport associated with asymmetric loading of containers G Tucker (RSSB) and W Newton, M Seidl, R Cuerden (TRL) Transport Research Laboratory Creating the future of transport Rail Safety and Standards Board PROJECT REPORT PPR691 Potential risks to road and rail transport associated with asymmetric loading of containers Gareth Tucker (RSSB) and William Newton, Matt Seidl, Richard Cuerden (TRL) Prepared for: RSSB / TRL, Quality approved: Julie Austin, Andrew Parkes, Andrew Broadbent, TRL (Project TRL (Technical RSSB (Technical Manager) Referee) Referee) Disclaimer This report has been produced by RSSB and the Transport Research Laboratory under a contract with RSSB / TRL. Any views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of RSSB / TRL. The information contained herein is the property of RSSB and TRL Limited and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the customer for whom this report was prepared. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the matter presented in this report is relevant, accurate and up-to-date, RSSB and TRL Limited cannot accept any liability for any error or omission, or reliance on part or all of the content in another context. Contents amendment record This report has been amended and issued as follows: Version Date Description Editor Technical Referee Asymmetric loading of containers Table of Contents 1 Introduction 5 2 Use of ISO containers 6 2.1 Types of container 6 2.1.1 ISO Containers 6 2.1.2
    [Show full text]
  • The Balancing of Steam Locomotives
    The Balancing of Steam Locomotives: A Dynamical Problem of the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries by PETER SIDNEY BARDELL A thesis submitted to the University of London for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy History of Science & Technology Group Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine December 1988 2 SUMMARY Following a brief survey of the prehistory of balancing and its emergence as a technique of vibration control early in the nineteenth century, this thesis examines the problem of steam locomotive balancing. From 1845 when the investigations of the Gauge Commission highlighted the importance of the stability of the locomotive at speed the subject occupied the attention of British engineers for over a century. The study examines the reasons for the persistence of the problem over such a prolonged period and the contribution of engineering science to the design of the locomotive. The thesis deals with the identification of the dynamical problem, the development of a theory of balancing and its presentation to engineers. Also considered here are some locomotive examples and proposals emanating from engineers dissatisfied with the inherent instability of the conventional two-cylinder engine. The relationship between locomotive practice and balancing is then traced. Economic aspects of bridge maintenance eventually focused the attention of engineers on the nub of the issue and culminated in the work of the Bridge stress Committee, during the mid-1920s, which clearly exposed the significance of the dynamic interaction between locomotive and track, and led to the introduction of proper balancing parameters in locomotive design. During the 1930s good balancing practice combined with 3 other rationalised design procedures enabled British express passenger locomotive practice to attain the peak of its achievement, although this was accomplished with three- and four-cylinder engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 2 Section 2 POINTWORK CONSTRUCTION Issued June 2004
    Part 2 Section 2 POINTWORK CONSTRUCTION Issued June 2004 2.6 Making Pointwork Components liners can be held in place with double sided tape when setting up. Special jaw liners can be The range of tools for making pointwork made with grooves, notches or holes to protect components is fairly basic. The minimum finished items. requirements are: • Files of best quality, in good condition, including Note: At the risk of stating the obvious, when a large coarse-cut flat file for the heavy cutting, cutting lengths of rail to form components always (9in or even 12in), a similar size fine-cut flat file make them a few millimetres too long to allow for finer work and Swiss files, half-round and mistakes to be corrected. A component that is too knife-edge. long can be shortened but a component that is too Note: For use on brass and nickel silver files short is scrap. should be new with the teeth chalked - brass needs very sharp files to avoid the need for excessive 2.6.1 Blades and stock rails pressure. Mark the handles to keep them separate The geometry of pointwork based on the prototype from the others. As they wear they can be is dealt with in greater detail in data sheet downgraded for use on steel. D2.2.1.1. For the majority of model applications •Wet and Dry paper, for fine finishing. Sanding point blades will either be straight switches sticks can be made by wrapping strips around pivoted at the heel or semi-curved switches where small timber section and securing with glue.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical-Mechanics
    DYNAMO AND MOTORPROBLEMS pRACTICAL9D 'MECHANICS EDITOR : F. J. CA MM DECEMBER 1947 102) THE NEW 30,000 -TON LINER"OFtCAD.ES" ON THE STOCKS (See page PRINCIPAL CONTENTS World of Models The Reign of Radium Adjustable Focusing Stand Letters from Readers Electric Light and Power Installation Mobile X -Ray Unit Cyclist Section Eyes and Ears of the Air Making a Shocking Coil 4/- per doz,,n sub, plus Purchase Tax N° 300 M ADE BY People are amazed when they learn of the variety of CLIPS we make - steel clips, bronze clips, stainless clips, bigclips,smallclips...clipsinevery conceivable shape and pattern...clips for every possible use. We can make to print or specification orour Research Department can design a clip for that particular job of yours. Over 92 years of clip -making is at your disposal. HERBERT TERRY & SONS LTD.,REDDITCH London, Birmingham, Manchester, December, 1947 NEWNES PRACTICAL MECHANICS 73 JOHNSONPLASTIC News of the models Although the productionof our famous PRINTING FRAME modelsis increasing,alargequota is FOR AMATEUR PHOTOGRAPHERS reserved for export, and supplies for the home market are therefore limited. THIS new frameismoulded inone piece in Our Gauge ' 0' Model Railway Catalogue (GI12), price II-, will give you hard plasticwithsquared -upsidesand prices of models available and delivery dates of forthcoming models. Send for it to -day. ends.The hinged back fitsaccurately and " PECO-WAY," the most realistic Gauge ' 00' Permanent Way. Send cannot slip or slide.Sturdy steel springs exert for Booklet, price 6d. " Model Railway Handbook," Standard Edition.Price 6s. 6d. anevenpressureover the whole surfaceof " How to Build a Working Model Road Tractor,in.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study on Building the National Technical Regulation and Standard Set for Railway
    No. MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT VIETNAM RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM THE STUDY ON BUILDING THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL REGULATION AND STANDARD SET FOR RAILWAY FINAL REPORT June 2009 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY JAPAN RAILWAY TECHNICAL SERVICE EID JR 09-072 Preface In response to the Government of Vietnam, the Government of Japan decided to implement a Study on Building the National Technical Regulation and Standard Set for Railway in Vietnam, and entrusted the study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected and dispatched a study team consisted of the Japan Railway Technical Service (JARTS) members, headed by Mr. Kiichi Takemura, nine times to Vietnam from February 2008 to April 2009. The team held discussions with the officials concerned of the Government of Vietnam and other related agencies, and also promoted studies on important matters required on railways in Vietnam. As an outcome of these efforts, the final report has been completed for submission. I hope that this report will contribute to the enactment and enforcement of the National Technical Regulation and Standard Set for Railway with a proper promotion of safe and stable railway businesses, as well as to the enhancement of friendly relations between our two countries. Finally, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to those who have kindly extended support and cooperation to the study. MayJune 2009 2009 Toshiyuki Kuroyanagi DirectorYos hihisa General Ueda Economic InfrastructureVice Department President JapanJapan International International Cooperation Cooperation AgencyAgency (JICA)(JICA) June 2009 Mr. Toshiyuki Kuroyanagi Director General Economic Infrastructure Department Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Submission of Final Report Dear Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • North West and Central Route Specification
    Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Route Specifications 2021 North West and Central (NW&C) region 8 Contents July 2021 Network Rail – Route Specifications: North West and Central 02 •Route H: Cross-Pennine, Yorkshire & Humber and North West (West section) 3 Route M: West Midlands and Chilterns 96 Route N: West Coast Main Line 146 Route O: Merseyrail 196 Glossary 200 Route H: Cross-Pennine, July 2021 Network Rail –Route Specifications: North West and Central 03 Yorkshire & Humber and North West (North West section) SRS H.05 North Transpennine: Leeds to Guide Bridge 4 SRS H.41 Windermere Branch 70 SRS H.10 Manchester Victoria to Mirfield (via Rochdale) 7 SRS H.42 Carnforth to Long Preston 73 and to Stalybridge SRS H.43 Morecambe and Heysham Port Branch 76 SRS H.17 South Transpennine: Dore to Hazel Grove 10 SRS H.44 Roses Line and Branches (including Preston to 79 SRS H.22 Manchester Piccadilly to Crewe 13 Ormskirk and Blackburn to Hellifield SRS H.23 Manchester Piccadilly to Deansgate 16 SRS H.45 Chester and Ellesmere Port to Warrington Bank 82 SRS H.24 Deansgate to Liverpool South Parkway 19 Quay SRS H.25 Liverpool Lime Street to Liverpool South Parkway 22 SRS H.46 Blackpool South Branch 85 SRS H.26 North Transpennine: Manchester Piccadilly to 25 SRS H.98 Freight Trunk Routes and H.99 Other Freight 88 Guide Bridge Routes SRS H.27 Deansgate to Euxton Junction 28 SRS H.28 Ashburys and Hyde North to New Mills Central 31 and Rose Hill SRS H.29 Guide Bridge to Glossop and Hadfield 34 SRS H.30 Guide Bridge to Chester (via Stockport)
    [Show full text]